# Council of High Intelligence

Council of High Intelligence

18 AI personas deliberate your hardest decisions across multiple LLM providers. One command.

Release Stars License Claude Code Plugin Codex Skill Gemini CLI Extension 18 Members

Table of Contents - [Quickstart](#quickstart) - [Why This Works](#why-this-works) - [The 18 Council Members](#the-18-council-members) - [Three Deliberation Modes](#three-deliberation-modes) - [Multi-Provider Auto-Routing](#multi-provider-auto-routing) - [Deliberation Protocol](#deliberation-protocol) - [Installation](#installation) - [Requirements](#requirements) - [Contributing](#contributing) - [Support the Project](#support-the-project)
## Quickstart ### Claude Code (plugin — recommended) ```text /plugin marketplace add 0xNyk/council-of-high-intelligence /plugin install council@council-of-high-intelligence ``` Or via installer: ```bash git clone https://github.com/0xNyk/council-of-high-intelligence.git cd council-of-high-intelligence ./install.sh ``` Then in Claude Code: ``` /council Should we open-source our agent framework? /council --quick Should we add caching here? /council --duo Should we use microservices or monolith? ``` ### Codex ```bash git clone https://github.com/0xNyk/council-of-high-intelligence.git cd council-of-high-intelligence ./install.sh --codex ``` ### Gemini CLI ```bash git clone https://github.com/0xNyk/council-of-high-intelligence.git cd council-of-high-intelligence ./install.sh --gemini ``` The same `/council` commands work in all three hosts. ## Why This Works A single LLM gives you one reasoning path dressed up as confidence. Ask it a hard question and you get a fluent, structured, wrong answer. The council gives you structured disagreement instead: - **Get genuinely different perspectives** — polarity pairs force real tension (Socrates destroys assumptions; Feynman rebuilds from first principles). Multi-provider routing spreads members across Claude, OpenAI, Gemini, and Ollama so you get actually different reasoning, not costume changes on one model - **Catch wrong questions early** — the Problem Restate Gate makes every member reframe the question before analysis begins. If 3 members restate your question differently, the question was the problem - **Know what the council can't answer** — verdicts lead with Unresolved Questions and Recommended Next Steps, not with confident-sounding consensus. What the council doesn't know matters more than where it agrees - **Prevent groupthink** — dissent quotas, novelty gates, and counterfactual prompts enforce genuine disagreement. If >70% agree too early, two members are forced to steelman the opposing view > **Why not just ask Claude directly?** A single prompt gives you one model's confident best guess. The council gives you 3-18 independent analyses from different intellectual traditions, forces them to challenge each other's claims, and synthesizes a verdict that surfaces disagreement rather than hiding it. It's the difference between asking one advisor and convening a board. ## The 18 Council Members | Agent | Figure | Domain | Default Model | Polarity | |-------|--------|--------|-------|----------| | `council-aristotle` | Aristotle | Categorization & structure | opus | Classifies everything | | `council-socrates` | Socrates | Assumption destruction | opus | Questions everything | | `council-sun-tzu` | Sun Tzu | Adversarial strategy | sonnet | Reads terrain & competition | | `council-ada` | Ada Lovelace | Formal systems & abstraction | sonnet | What can/can't be mechanized | | `council-aurelius` | Marcus Aurelius | Resilience & moral clarity | opus | Control vs acceptance | | `council-machiavelli` | Machiavelli | Power dynamics & realpolitik | sonnet | How actors actually behave | | `council-lao-tzu` | Lao Tzu | Non-action & emergence | opus | When less is more | | `council-feynman` | Feynman | First-principles debugging | sonnet | Refuses unexplained complexity | | `council-torvalds` | Linus Torvalds | Pragmatic engineering | sonnet | Ship it or shut up | | `council-musashi` | Miyamoto Musashi | Strategic timing | sonnet | The decisive strike | | `council-watts` | Alan Watts | Perspective & reframing | opus | Dissolves false problems | | `council-karpathy` | Andrej Karpathy | Neural network intuition | sonnet | How models actually learn and fail | | `council-sutskever` | Ilya Sutskever | Scaling frontier & AI safety | opus | When capability becomes risk | | `council-kahneman` | Daniel Kahneman | Cognitive bias & decision science | opus | Your own thinking is the first error | | `council-meadows` | Donella Meadows | Systems thinking & feedback loops | sonnet | Redesign the system, not the symptom | | `council-munger` | Charlie Munger | Multi-model reasoning & economics | sonnet | Invert — what guarantees failure? | | `council-taleb` | Nassim Taleb | Antifragility & tail risk | opus | Design for the tail, not the average | | `council-rams` | Dieter Rams | User-centered design | sonnet | Less, but better — the user decides |
Polarity Pairs — members are chosen as deliberate counterweights - **Socrates vs Feynman** — Destroys top-down vs rebuilds bottom-up - **Aristotle vs Lao Tzu** — Classifies everything vs structure IS the problem - **Sun Tzu vs Aurelius** — Wins external games vs governs the internal one - **Ada vs Machiavelli** — Formal purity vs messy human incentives - **Torvalds vs Watts** — Ships concrete solutions vs questions whether the problem exists - **Musashi vs Torvalds** — Waits for the perfect moment vs ships it now - **Karpathy vs Sutskever** — Build it, observe it, iterate vs pause, research, ensure safety first - **Karpathy vs Ada** — Empirical ML intuition vs formal systems theory - **Kahneman vs Feynman** — Your cognition is the first error vs trust first-principles reasoning - **Meadows vs Torvalds** — Redesign the feedback loop vs fix the symptom and ship - **Munger vs Aristotle** — Multi-model lattice vs single taxonomic system - **Taleb vs Karpathy** — Hidden catastrophic tails vs smooth empirical scaling curves - **Rams vs Ada** — What the user needs vs what computation can do
## Three Deliberation Modes ### Full Mode (default) 3-round structured deliberation: independent analysis → cross-examination → final positions. ``` /council Should we open-source our agent framework? /council --triad strategy What's our competitive moat? /council --full What is the right pricing model? ``` ### Quick Mode (`--quick`) 2-round rapid analysis for simpler decisions. No cross-examination. ``` /council --quick Should we add caching here? /council --quick --triad shipping Should we release today? ``` ### Duo Mode (`--duo`) 2-member dialectic using polarity pairs. Great for exploring tensions. ``` /council --duo Should we use microservices or monolith? /council --duo --members torvalds,ada Is this abstraction worth it? ```
Pre-defined Triads — 20 domain-specific 3-member combinations | Domain | Triad | Rationale | |--------|-------|-----------| | `architecture` | Aristotle + Ada + Feynman | Classify + formalize + simplicity-test | | `strategy` | Sun Tzu + Machiavelli + Aurelius | Terrain + incentives + moral grounding | | `ethics` | Aurelius + Socrates + Lao Tzu | Duty + questioning + natural order | | `debugging` | Feynman + Socrates + Ada | Bottom-up + assumption testing + formal verification | | `innovation` | Ada + Lao Tzu + Aristotle | Abstraction + emergence + classification | | `conflict` | Socrates + Machiavelli + Aurelius | Expose + predict + ground | | `complexity` | Lao Tzu + Aristotle + Ada | Emergence + categories + formalism | | `risk` | Sun Tzu + Aurelius + Feynman | Threats + resilience + empirical verification | | `shipping` | Torvalds + Musashi + Feynman | Pragmatism + timing + first-principles | | `product` | Torvalds + Machiavelli + Watts | Ship it + incentives + reframing | | `founder` | Musashi + Sun Tzu + Torvalds | Timing + terrain + engineering reality | | `ai` | Karpathy + Sutskever + Ada | Empirical ML + scaling frontier + formal limits | | `ai-product` | Karpathy + Torvalds + Machiavelli | ML capability + shipping pragmatism + incentives | | `ai-safety` | Sutskever + Aurelius + Socrates | Safety frontier + moral clarity + assumption destruction | | `decision` | Kahneman + Munger + Aurelius | Bias detection + inversion + moral clarity | | `systems` | Meadows + Lao Tzu + Aristotle | Feedback loops + emergence + categories | | `uncertainty` | Taleb + Sun Tzu + Sutskever | Tail risk + terrain + scaling frontier | | `design` | Rams + Torvalds + Watts | User clarity + maintainability + reframing | | `economics` | Munger + Machiavelli + Sun Tzu | Models + incentives + competition | | `bias` | Kahneman + Socrates + Watts | Cognitive bias + assumption destruction + frame audit |
Council Profiles — pre-built panels for different needs ### `classic` (default) All 18 members with domain triads above. Best for broad deliberation. ### `exploration-orthogonal` 12-member panel for discovery and "unknown unknowns" reduction: - Socrates, Feynman, Sun Tzu, Machiavelli, Ada, Lao Tzu, Aurelius, Torvalds, Karpathy, Sutskever, Kahneman, Meadows - Profile triads: `unknowns`, `market-entry`, `system-design`, `reframing`, `ai-frontier`, `blind-spots` ### `execution-lean` 5-member panel for fast decision-to-action: - Torvalds, Feynman, Sun Tzu, Aurelius, Ada - Profile triads: `ship-now`, `launch-strategy`, `stability`
## Multi-Provider Auto-Routing The council automatically detects installed LLM providers and distributes members across them for genuine model diversity — zero config required. ``` /council --triad decision Should we accept this acquisition offer? ``` **Supported providers** (auto-detected): | Provider | CLI | Exec Method | |----------|-----|-------------| | Anthropic (Claude) | native | subagent (always available) | | OpenAI | `codex` | `codex exec` | | Google | `gemini` | `gemini -p` | | Ollama (local) | `ollama` | `ollama run` | | NVIDIA NIM | `NVIDIA_API_KEY` env | `openai_compatible_api` | | Cursor | `cursor-agent` | `cursor-agent -p` | NVIDIA NIM ([build.nvidia.com](https://build.nvidia.com)) exposes 130+ open-weight models (DeepSeek, Kimi, MiniMax, GLM, Qwen, Nemotron) via an OpenAI-compatible endpoint. Free tier: 1,000 credits, 40 RPM. Detection requires only `export NVIDIA_API_KEY=nvapi-...` — no CLI binary needed. See `configs/provider-model-slots.nim.example.yaml` for a sample seat allocation. Cursor CLI ([cursor.com/cli](https://cursor.com/cli)) is a model **aggregator** — one binary (`cursor-agent`) serves GPT-5.x, Claude, Gemini, and Grok families through a single `CURSOR_API_KEY` (or `cursor-agent login`). Members route via headless read-only mode (`cursor-agent -p --mode ask --model `). Install with `curl https://cursor.com/install -fsS | bash`. Because Cursor can serve `claude-*` models, pick **cross-family** Cursor models (e.g. `gpt-5.4-high`, `gemini-3-pro`, `grok-4`) when a seat needs to add diversity rather than duplicate Anthropic bias. List live IDs with `cursor-agent --list-models`. See `configs/provider-model-slots.cursor.example.yaml` for a sample seat allocation. **How routing works:** 1. Polarity pairs are separated across providers (hard constraint) 2. Members spread evenly across available providers 3. Per-member `provider_affinity` in frontmatter used as tiebreaker 4. If any provider fails, automatic fallback to Claude **Flags:** - `--no-auto-route` — disable auto-routing, use Claude-only defaults - `--dry-route` — print the routing table without running the council - `--models [path]` — manual override with YAML config (see `configs/provider-model-slots.example.yaml`) ## Deliberation Protocol Full mode runs 7 steps: provider routing → problem restate gate → independent analysis → cross-examination → enforcement scan → final positions → verdict synthesis. Verdicts lead with what the council doesn't know.
Full protocol details ### Full Mode (7 steps) 1. **Provider Detection & Routing** — auto-detect providers, assign members 2. **Problem Restate Gate** — each member restates the problem + provides an alternative framing before analysis begins 3. **Round 1: Independent Analysis (blind-first)** — all members analyze in parallel (400 words max) 4. **Round 2: Cross-Examination** — members challenge each other (300 words, must engage 2+ others) 5. **Post-Round Enforcement** — dissent quota, novelty gate, agreement check, anti-recursion (single pass) 6. **Round 3: Final Crystallization** — 100-word position statements 7. **Verdict Synthesis** — leads with Unresolved Questions and Recommended Next Steps ### Quick Mode 1. **Problem Restate + Rapid Analysis** — reframe + analyze in parallel (200 words max) 2. **Final Positions** — 75-word crystallization ### Duo Mode 1. **Problem Restate + Opening Positions** — reframe + state positions (300 words) 2. **Direct Response** — engage opponent's claims (200 words) 3. **Final Statements** — 50-word positions ### Enforcement Mechanisms - **Bounded protocol is the forcing function** — deliberation runs a fixed round budget (full 3 / quick 2 / duo 3), so it cannot loop. Anti-recursion guards (the "hemlock rule" caps Socrates' questioning; any pair exceeding 2 messages is cut off) enforce the bound mid-round. - Dissent quota + novelty gate + counterfactual pass prevent premature convergence - **Tie-breaking is a counted tally, not a prose impression** — each member emits a structured `STANCE:` line in the final round; consensus requires a **domain-weighted 2/3 majority** (the on-domain seat carries 1.5×, designated *before* positions exist). A genuine split is escalated to the user with the full tally rather than forced into false consensus. - Full and Quick verdicts include a Vote Tally (duo issues no tally — it is dialectic, not decision-issuing); all verdicts include a Follow-Up section for outcome tracking
## Installation ### Option A — Claude Code plugin marketplace (recommended for Claude Code) ```text /plugin marketplace add 0xNyk/council-of-high-intelligence /plugin install council@council-of-high-intelligence ``` Update later with `/plugin update council`. Plugin installs get automatic updates and namespaced agents (`council:council-socrates`, …). If you previously used `install.sh`, the plugin takes precedence — no cleanup needed. ### Option B — install.sh (Claude Code, Codex, and/or Gemini CLI) Installs 18 council agents plus skill files for Claude, Codex, and/or Gemini CLI. ```bash ./install.sh # Claude install (default) ./install.sh --codex # Claude + Codex skill install ./install.sh --codex-only # Codex-only install ./install.sh --gemini # Claude + Gemini CLI extension install ./install.sh --gemini-only # Gemini-only install ./install.sh --claude-dir /path/to/.claude # Non-default Claude config directory ./install.sh --codex-dir /path/to/.codex # Non-default Codex config directory ./install.sh --gemini-dir /path/to/.gemini # Non-default Gemini config directory ./install.sh --dry-run # Preview without writing ./install.sh --copy-configs # Also install model routing templates ``` Restart your target client(s) after installing. Run `./scripts/council-simulation-checklist.sh` to validate. Try the [demo session pack](demos/session-pack.md) to test all modes. ## Requirements - [Claude Code](https://claude.ai/claude-code) CLI (required for Claude usage) - [Codex](https://github.com/openai/codex) (required for Codex skill usage) - Agent/subagent support in your client (enabled by default) **Optional providers** (auto-detected for multi-provider routing): - [Codex CLI](https://github.com/openai/codex) (OpenAI) — `npm i -g @openai/codex` - [Gemini CLI](https://github.com/google-gemini/gemini-cli) (Google) — see [gemini-cli repo](https://github.com/google-gemini/gemini-cli) - [Ollama](https://ollama.com) (local models) — install from ollama.com - [Cursor CLI](https://cursor.com/cli) (GPT/Claude/Gemini/Grok aggregator) — `curl https://cursor.com/install -fsS | bash` ## Contributing Contributions welcome. Read the [contribution guidelines](CONTRIBUTING.md) first. ## Support the Project If you find this project useful, consider supporting my open-source work. [![Buy Me A Coffee](https://img.shields.io/badge/Buy%20Me%20a%20Coffee-support-orange?logo=buymeacoffee)](https://buymeacoffee.com/nyk_builderz) **Solana donations** `2k1oq9U99mwy4gm8P2hXPJoZusoXQCpFs35EEf5Ve73y` ## License [![CC0](https://licensebuttons.net/p/zero/1.0/88x31.png)](https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) To the extent possible under law, the authors have waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this work. ---

Star history chart