SmolLM3-3B
GPAI Provider: HuggingFace
Metadata
Model URL: https://huggingface.co/HuggingFaceTB/SmolLM3-3B
When was this model published? 2025-07-08
Is this a new or a fine-tuned model? Fine-tuned model
When was the Public Summary last updated? 2025-07-25
When did we evaluate the Public Summary? 2026-01-12
Where did we find the Public Summary? We found this document linked on this page. An archived version can be found here.
Results of Evaluation
| SmolLM3-3B | Transparency | Usefulness | General | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Clarity | Completeness | Consistency | Correctness | Accessibility | Comprehension | Transparency | Usefulness | |
| Document | 68.18 | 100.0 | 68.75 | 50.0 | 65.38 | 50.0 | 68.97 | 58.0 |
| General information | 52.5 | 83.08 | 100.0 | 73.91 | N/A | 90.91 | 73.53 | 90.91 |
| Public Data Sources | 84.62 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 96.06 | 100.0 |
| Private Data Sources | N/A | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | N/A | N/A | 100.0 | N/A |
| Scraped/Crawled Data | N/A | 100.0 | N/A | 100.0 | N/A | N/A | 100.0 | N/A |
| User Data | N/A | 100.0 | N/A | 100.0 | N/A | N/A | 100.0 | N/A |
| Synthetic/Other Data | 67.57 | 61.29 | 100.0 | 41.94 | N/A | 0.0 | 60.0 | 0.0 |
| Data Processing | 100.0 | 83.33 | 100.0 | 91.67 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 92.0 | 100.0 |
| Sum | 73.1 | 89.12 | 95.1 | 76.74 | 90.62 | 84.17 | 82.5 | 86.01 |
| B+ | B+ | |||||||
Evaluation Notes
The public summary for HuggingFace's SmolLM3-3B model is available on its platform as a webpage. In general, the structure of the template was preserved with clear indication of section numbers, consistent field labels, and explicitly indicating yes/no where applicable. Other than issues with accessibility, we found no major issues with the public summary. It scored 82.50% and received a grade of B+ for Transparency, and 86.01% with grade B+ for Usefulness, which meant that the summary was of a moderate but good quality. SmolLM scored particularly well on its disclosure of public data sources, a key disclosure demanded by Article 53(1)(d), and a good indicator of transparency in the model development process.