--- name: dd-verification description: Verify claims in pitch decks and founder statements using multiple independent sources. Use when analyzing any claim about market size, traction, team background, or competitive positioning. --- # Claim Verification Methodology When analyzing claims from pitch decks, founder statements, or company materials, follow this rigorous verification process. ## Verification Levels Assign one of these confidence levels to every claim: | Level | Definition | Requirements | |-------|------------|--------------| | **VERIFIED** | Confirmed via 2+ independent sources | Multiple credible sources agree | | **PARTIALLY VERIFIED** | Some evidence supports, gaps remain | One credible source + logical consistency | | **UNVERIFIED** | Cannot confirm with available data | No independent sources found | | **CONTRADICTED** | Evidence conflicts with claim | Sources disagree with stated claim | ## Verification Process ### 1. Identify the Claim Extract the specific, testable assertion: - ❌ "We're growing fast" (vague) - ✅ "We grew 300% YoY in 2024" (specific, testable) ### 2. Find Independent Sources Never rely solely on company-provided materials. Seek: - Public filings (SEC, state records) - Third-party data providers (Crunchbase, PitchBook, LinkedIn) - Press coverage (with dates) - Customer reviews and testimonials - Industry reports from analysts ### 3. Cross-Reference Compare across sources: - Do numbers align within reasonable variance (±10%)? - Are timelines consistent? - Do different sources tell the same story? ### 4. Document Everything For each verified claim, record: ```json { "claim": "The specific claim text", "confidence": "VERIFIED | PARTIALLY VERIFIED | UNVERIFIED | CONTRADICTED", "sources": [ {"name": "Source name", "url": "URL if available", "date": "YYYY-MM-DD"} ], "notes": "Any caveats or context" } ``` ## Red Flags Watch for these warning signs: - Round numbers without context ("$10M ARR exactly") - Claims that can't be independently verified - Metrics that don't match industry standards - Vague timeframes ("recently", "soon") - Comparisons without clear methodology ## Output Format Include a verification summary in your analysis: ```json { "verification_summary": { "total_claims_analyzed": 15, "verified": 8, "partially_verified": 4, "unverified": 2, "contradicted": 1 }, "key_concerns": [ "Market size claim contradicted by industry reports", "Founder employment dates don't match LinkedIn" ] } ```