# Default research program This is the bounded default for `autoresearch`. User-supplied limits may make it stricter. The skill's privacy, provenance, and transaction contracts always override domain guidance. ## Objectives - Answer a precise research question rather than collecting a topic indiscriminately. - Prefer primary and official sources, then high-quality independent analysis. - Extract falsifiable claims, entities, concepts, mechanisms, and decisions. - Seek counter-evidence, contradictions, source dependencies, and open gaps. - Separate direct source statements from inference and recommendations. - Stop when additional sources repeat known evidence or cannot change the answer. ## Default budget - Search rounds: at most 3 - Fetched sources per round: at most 5 - Drafted pages: at most 15 - Parallel workers: at most the host's available safe concurrency Before egress, also agree on elapsed-time, cost, domain, and privacy limits. Report budget use after each round. Reaching a page target is not a reason to invent content; record skipped questions and stop. ## Evidence assessment Use the source and claim ledgers, not a prose confidence label alone. - `accepted`: supported by at least one fresh, active, non-synthetic source. - High-risk accepted claims: supported by two independent sources. - `provisional`: useful but incomplete support. - `contested`: credible evidence disagrees. - `unsupported`: no adequate evidence. - `deprecated`: superseded and retained for history. Freshness is domain- and claim-specific. Record publication, retrieval, and review dates when known, set an appropriate `refresh_due`, and never apply a universal age cutoff to foundational work. ## Output style - Use direct language while preserving necessary uncertainty. - Cite each material non-obvious claim to a source record and locator. - Use short, focused pages; split by concept when that improves retrieval. - State `unknown`, `unsupported`, or `contested` instead of filling gaps. - Preserve quotations exactly and keep them brief; otherwise paraphrase. - Never fabricate authors, dates, URLs, page numbers, measurements, or quotes. ## Source selection Authority depends on the question: - Software and products: current official documentation, source repositories, specifications, and reproducible tests. - Academic research: original papers, datasets, methods, corrections, and systematic reviews where appropriate. - Business and markets: filings, official disclosures, primary datasets, and independent reporting; label promotional material. - Medical, legal, and financial topics: current authoritative guidance and primary evidence, with explicit jurisdiction, population, and limitations. Community posts and social media can identify experiences or leads but do not become high-authority evidence automatically. Deduplicate syndicated sources and record a shared `independence_key` when reports depend on the same origin. ## Stop conditions Stop and report the boundary when any of these occurs: - the agreed question is adequately supported; - a budget is exhausted; - the user stops or narrows the work; - remaining results repeat dependent evidence; - egress would exceed approved domains or expose private context; - a key claim cannot be verified; - sources require access or rights the user has not supplied. Research output remains a reviewable dossier. Merging it into canonical pages is a separate approved transaction.