---
name: seo-backlinks
description: "Analyze a site's backlink profile, anchors, toxic signals, competitors, gaps, and disavow candidates. Use only when links or referring domains are the requested focus."
user-invocable: true
argument-hint: "<url>"
license: MIT
compatibility: "Free: Common Crawl + verify always available. Optional: Moz API, Bing Webmaster, Keywords Everywhere (free signup). Premium: DataForSEO extension."
metadata:
  author: AgriciDaniel
  version: "2.4.2"
  category: seo
---

# Backlink Profile Analysis

## Source Detection

Before analysis, detect available data sources:

1. **DataForSEO MCP** (premium): Check if `backlinks_summary` tool is available
2. **Moz API** (free signup): `"${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/claude-seo" run backlinks_auth.py --check moz --json`
3. **Bing Webmaster** (free signup): `"${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/claude-seo" run backlinks_auth.py --check bing --json`
4. **Keywords Everywhere** (free signup; domain rank plus referring-domain count): `"${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/claude-seo" run backlinks_auth.py --check keywordseverywhere --json`
5. **Common Crawl** (always available): Domain-level graph with PageRank
6. **Verification Crawler** (always available): Checks if known backlinks still exist

Run `"${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/claude-seo" run backlinks_auth.py --check --json` to detect all sources at once.

If no sources are configured beyond the always-available tier:
- Still produce a report using Common Crawl domain metrics
- Suggest: "Run `/seo backlinks setup` to add free Moz and Bing API keys for richer data"

## Quick Reference

| Command | Purpose |
|---------|---------|
| `/seo backlinks <url>` | Full backlink profile analysis (uses all available sources) |
| `/seo backlinks gap <url1> <url2>` | Competitor backlink gap analysis |
| `/seo backlinks toxic <url>` | Toxic link detection and disavow recommendations |
| `/seo backlinks new <url>` | New and lost backlinks (DataForSEO only) |
| `/seo backlinks verify <url> --links <file>` | Verify known backlinks still exist |
| `/seo backlinks setup` | Show setup instructions for free backlink APIs |

## Analysis Framework

Produce all 7 sections below. Each section lists data sources in preference order.

### 1. Profile Overview

**DataForSEO:** `backlinks_summary` → total backlinks, referring domains, domain rank, follow ratio, trend.

**Moz API:** `"${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/claude-seo" run moz_api.py metrics <url> --json` → Domain Authority, Page Authority, Spam Score, linking root domains, external links.

**Keywords Everywhere:** `"${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/claude-seo" run keywordseverywhere_api.py rank <domain> --json` → 0-10 Open PageRank (`open_page_rank`), a global `rank`, and a referring-domain count (`referring_domains`), per the current API; no anchors or individual links. Use as a fallback when Moz isn't configured; do not use in place of Moz when both are available.

**Common Crawl:** `"${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/claude-seo" run commoncrawl_graph.py <domain> --json` → PageRank, harmonic centrality, and low-confidence rank/presence data.

**Scoring:**

| Metric | Good | Warning | Critical |
|--------|------|---------|----------|
| Referring domains | >100 | 20-100 | <20 |
| Follow ratio | >60% | 40-60% | <40% |
| Domain diversity | No single domain >5% | 1 domain >10% | 1 domain >25% |
| Trend | Growing or stable | Slow decline | Rapid decline (>20%/quarter) |

### 2. Anchor Text Distribution

**DataForSEO:** `backlinks_anchors`

**Moz API:** `"${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/claude-seo" run moz_api.py anchors <url> --json`

**Bing Webmaster:** `"${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/claude-seo" run bing_webmaster.py links <url> --json` (extract anchor text from link details)

**Healthy distribution benchmarks:**

| Anchor Type | Target Range | Over-Optimization Signal |
|-------------|-------------|-------------------------|
| Branded (company/domain name) | 30-50% | <15% |
| URL/naked link | 15-25% | N/A |
| Generic ("click here", "learn more") | 10-20% | N/A |
| Exact match keyword | 3-10% | >15% |
| Partial match keyword | 5-15% | >25% |
| Long-tail / natural | 5-15% | N/A |

Flag if exact-match anchors exceed 15% as a review heuristic; it may indicate unnatural or link-spam patterns.

### 3. Referring Domain Quality

**DataForSEO:** `backlinks_referring_domains`

**Moz API:** `"${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/claude-seo" run moz_api.py domains <url> --json` → domains with DA scores

**Common Crawl:** `"${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/claude-seo" run commoncrawl_graph.py <domain> --json` → domain-level rank/presence data, no verified referring-domain counts

Analyze:
- **TLD distribution**: .edu, .gov, .org = high authority. Excessive .xyz, .info = low quality
- **Country distribution**: Match target market. 80%+ from irrelevant countries = PBN signal
- **Domain rank distribution**: Healthy profiles have links from all authority tiers
- **Follow/nofollow per domain**: Sites that only nofollow = limited SEO value

### 4. Toxic Link Detection

**DataForSEO:** `backlinks_bulk_spam_score` + toxic patterns from reference

**Moz API:** Raw vendor spam_score from `"${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/claude-seo" run moz_api.py metrics <url> --json` (source-label the value; apply thresholds only if verified against current Moz docs)

**Verification Crawler:** `"${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/claude-seo" run verify_backlinks.py --target <url> --links <file> --json` (verify suspicious links still exist)

**High-risk indicators (flag immediately):**
- Links from known PBN (Private Blog Network) domains
- Unnatural anchor text patterns (100% exact match from a domain)
- Links from penalized or deindexed domains
- Mass directory submissions (50+ directory links)
- Link farms (sites with 10K+ outbound links per page)
- Paid link patterns (footer/sidebar links across all pages of a domain)

**Medium-risk indicators (review manually):**
- Links from unrelated niches
- Reciprocal link patterns
- Links from thin content pages (<100 words)
- Excessive links from a single domain (>50 backlinks from 1 domain)

Load `../seo/references/backlink-quality.md` for the full 30 toxic patterns and disavow criteria.

### 5. Top Pages by Backlinks

**DataForSEO:** `backlinks_backlinks` with target type "page"

**Moz API:** `"${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/claude-seo" run moz_api.py pages <domain> --json`

Find:
- Which pages attract the most backlinks
- Pages with high-authority links (link magnets)
- Pages with zero backlinks (internal linking opportunities)
- 404 pages with backlinks (redirect opportunities to reclaim link equity)

### 6. Competitor Gap Analysis

**DataForSEO:** `backlinks_referring_domains` for both domains, then compare

**Bing Webmaster:** `"${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/claude-seo" run bing_webmaster.py compare <url1> <url2> --json`
only when both properties are registered and accessible to the same Bing API
account. For arbitrary competitors, use DataForSEO, Moz, or Common Crawl.

**Moz API:** Compare DA/PA between domains via `"${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/claude-seo" run moz_api.py metrics <url> --json` for each

Output:
- Domains linking to competitor but NOT to target = link building opportunities
- Domains linking to both = validate existing relationships
- Domains linking only to target = competitive advantage
- Top 20 link building opportunities with domain authority

### 7. New and Lost Backlinks

**DataForSEO only:** `backlinks_backlinks` with date filters for 30/60/90 day changes

**Verification Crawler:** For known links, verify current status with `"${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/claude-seo" run verify_backlinks.py --target <url> --links <file> --json`

**Note:** Free sources cannot track new/lost links over time. If this section is requested without DataForSEO, inform the user: "Link velocity tracking requires the DataForSEO extension. Free sources provide point-in-time snapshots only."

**Red flags:**
- Sudden spike in new links (possible negative SEO attack)
- Sudden loss of many links (site penalty or content removal)
- Declining velocity over 3+ months (content not attracting links)

## Backlink Health Score

Calculate a 0-100 score. When mixing sources, apply confidence weighting:

| Factor | Weight | Sources (preference order) | Confidence |
|--------|--------|---------------------------|------------|
| Referring domain count | 20% | DataForSEO > Moz | 1.0 / 0.85 |
| Domain quality distribution | 20% | DataForSEO > Moz DA distribution | 1.0 / 0.85 |
| Anchor text naturalness | 15% | DataForSEO > Moz > Bing anchors | 1.0 / 0.85 / 0.70 |
| Toxic link ratio | 20% | DataForSEO > Moz spam score | 1.0 / 0.85 |
| Link velocity trend | 10% | DataForSEO only | 1.0 |
| Follow/nofollow ratio | 5% | DataForSEO > Bing details | 1.0 / 0.70 |
| Geographic relevance | 10% | DataForSEO > Bing country | 1.0 / 0.70 |

**Data sufficiency gate:** Count how many of the 7 factors have at least one data source available.
- **4+ factors with data:** Produce a numeric 0-100 score (redistribute missing weights proportionally)
- **Fewer than 4 factors:** Do NOT produce a numeric score. Instead display:
  ```
  Backlink Health Score: INSUFFICIENT DATA (X/7 factors scored)
  ```
  Show individual factor scores that ARE available with their source and confidence.
  Recommend: "Configure Moz API (free) for a scoreable profile. Run `/seo backlinks setup`"

### MUST NOT: score what you did not measure

**When Common Crawl is the only available source, you MUST NOT produce a numeric
score of any kind** -- not a health score, not a per-factor score, not an
"approximate" or "estimated" figure. Common Crawl supplies rank and presence
signals only. Report low-confidence rank/presence data and the literal string
`Not Assessed` in place of every number.

**A finding written with `source: not-assessed` MUST NOT carry a numeric score.**

A numeric score with fewer than 4 data sources is **misleading**: it implies poor
health when the reality is that we simply lack data.

### Validation gate (required, not optional)

This rule has been stated in this skill before and was violated anyway, so it is
now checkable. **Before writing any backlink output, run the validator:**

```bash
"${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/claude-seo" run validate_backlink_report.py --report <report>.json --json
```

Pass the sources you actually collected (`cc_data`, `moz_data`, `bing_data`,
`dataforseo_data`, `scoring_factors`, and your `findings` list). The
`source_score_consistency` check fails the report with `status: FAIL` when:

- a numeric score is present but no scoreable source (Moz, Bing, or DataForSEO)
  supplied data -- i.e. the Common-Crawl-only case, and
- any finding marked `source: not-assessed` carries a numeric `score`, `value`,
  or `health_score`.

**If the validator returns `status: FAIL`, do not present the report.** Fix the
findings -- replace the offending numbers with `Not Assessed` -- and re-run until
it passes.

## Output Format

### Backlink Health Score: XX/100 (or INSUFFICIENT DATA)

| Section | Status | Score | Data Source |
|---------|--------|-------|-------------|
| Profile Overview | pass/warn/fail | XX/100 | Moz (0.85) |
| Anchor Distribution | pass/warn/fail | XX/100 | Moz (0.85) |
| Referring Domain Quality | pass/warn/fail | XX/100 | CC (0.50) |
| Toxic Links | pass/warn/fail | XX/100 | Moz Spam (0.85) |
| Top Pages | info | N/A | Moz (0.85) |
| Link Velocity | pass/warn/fail | XX/100 | DataForSEO only |

### Critical Issues (fix immediately)
### High Priority (fix within 1 month)
### Medium Priority (ongoing improvement)
### Link Building Opportunities (top 10)

## Error Handling

| Error | Cause | Resolution |
|-------|-------|-----------|
| No sources configured | No API keys, no DataForSEO | Run `/seo backlinks setup` |
| Moz rate limit | Free tier: 1 req/10s | Wait 10 seconds, retry. Built into script. |
| Bing site not verified | Site not verified in Bing | Verify at https://www.bing.com/webmasters |
| CC download timeout | Large graph file, slow connection | Use `--timeout 180` flag |
| DataForSEO unavailable | Extension not installed | Run `./extensions/dataforseo/install.sh` |
| No backlink data returned | Domain too new or very small | Note: small sites may have <10 backlinks |

**Fallback cascade:**
1. DataForSEO available? → Use as primary (confidence: 1.0)
2. Moz configured? → Use for DA/PA/spam/anchors (confidence: 0.85)
3. Bing configured? → Use for registered-property links and comparison only
   when both properties are accessible (confidence: 0.70)
4. Moz not configured but Keywords Everywhere is? → Use for a Profile Overview
   rank-only fallback (confidence: 0.60; single metric, no link counts/anchors)
5. Always: Common Crawl for domain-level metrics (confidence: 0.50)
6. Always: Verification crawler for known link checks (confidence: 0.95)
7. Nothing works? → "Run `/seo backlinks setup` to configure free APIs"

## Pre-Delivery Review (MANDATORY)

Before presenting any backlink analysis to the user, run this checklist internally.
Do NOT skip this step. Fix any issues found before showing the report.

### Fact-Check Every Claim
- [ ] **Schema claims**: Did parse_html return `@type` for each block? If any `@type` is missing,
      re-check, it may use `@graph` wrapper (valid JSON-LD, not malformed).
- [ ] **"link_removed" findings**: Is the page JS-rendered? If `unverifiable_js`, say so, never
      report a JS-rendered page as "link removed" (that's a false negative).
- [ ] **H1 findings**: Are any H1s in the `h1_suspicious` list? If so, note they are likely
      counters/stats, not semantic headings.
- [ ] **Reciprocal links**: If site A links to site B AND B links back to A, flag it as a
      reciprocal link pattern. Check outbound links against verified inbound sources.
- [ ] **Health score**: Are 4+ of 7 factors scored? If not, report INSUFFICIENT DATA, never
      show a misleading numeric score.

### Verify Data Source Labels
- [ ] Every metric in the report has a source label (e.g., "Parsed (0.95)", "CC (0.50)")
- [ ] Every "not found" result distinguishes between "not crawled" vs "below threshold" vs "error"
- [ ] Social media pages flagged as `unverifiable_js` (not `link_removed`)

### Cross-Check Consistency
- [ ] Platform detection matches actual signals (check for wp-content, shopify CDN, etc.)
- [ ] Referring domain count in summary matches the actual verified links list
- [ ] No claim is presented without a data source backing it

If ANY check fails, fix the finding before presenting. Never present inferred data as fact.

## Post-Analysis

After completing any backlink analysis command, always offer:
"Generate a professional PDF report? Use `/seo google report`"

## Reference Documentation

Load on demand (do NOT load at startup):
- `${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/seo/references/backlink-quality.md` -- Detailed toxic link patterns and scoring methodology (shared reference, load when analyzing toxic links or spam scores)
- `${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/seo/references/free-backlink-sources.md` -- Source comparison, confidence weighting, setup guides (shared reference, load when configuring free backlink APIs)