john-italos-gufo.owl
type: Ontology
comment: Sources: (1) KATERINA IERODIAKONOU John Italos on Universals, 2010 Documenti E Studi Sulla Tradizione Filosofica Medievale 18:231-247 (2007)
comment: author: András L. Komáromi This work is distributed under Creative Commons Attribution License CC BY 4.0

Acquired-by-mindby
type: Class
subclass of: Quality
subclass of: Restriction
  on property:
    inverse of: inheresIn
  qualified cardinality: 1
  on class: UniversalInThe Particulars
type: NamedIndividual
type: Kind
comment: "Italos claims (p . 8.1-14) that both the universals in the particulars and the universals after the particulars differ from the universals before the particulars, because they both are later-born than the perceptible individuals (husterogen), can be predicted of them (kat goroumena), are inseparable from them (achrista ), and are acquired by our mind by abstraction (k at ’ aph airesin )."

Be- predicated
type: Class
subclass of: Quality
subclass of: Restriction
  on property:
    inverse of: inheresIn
  qualified cardinality: 1
  on class: UniversalInThe Particulars
type: NamedIndividual
type: Kind
comment: "Italos claims (p . 8.1-14) that both the universals in the particulars and the universals after the particulars differ from the universals before the particulars, because they both are later-born than the perceptible individuals (husterogen), can be predicted of them (kat goroumena), are inseparable from them (achrista ), and are acquired by our mind by abstraction (k at ’ aph airesin )."

Inseparable
type: Class
subclass of: Quality
subclass of: Restriction
  on property: inheresIn
  min qualified cardinality: 1
  on class: UniversalInThe Particulars
type: NamedIndividual
type: Kind
comment: "Italos claims (p . 8.1-14) that both the universals in the particulars and the universals after the particulars differ from the universals before the particulars, because they both are later-born than the perceptible individuals (husterogen), can be predicted of them (kat goroumena), are inseparable from them (achrista ), and are acquired by our mind by abstraction (k at ’ aph airesin )."

Intelligible
type: Class
subclass of: Quality
subclass of: Restriction
  on property:
    inverse of: inheresIn
  qualified cardinality: 1
  on class: UniversalBeforeTheParticulars
type: NamedIndividual
type: Kind
comment: "On the other hand, the universal after the particulars are INTELLIGIBLE intelligible in a certain way, most probably because they are acquired by our mind by abstraction and they also are perceptible in a certain way, most probably because they are acquired by abstraction of the common characteristics of perceptible individuals."

Later-born
type: Class
subclass of: Quality
subclass of: Restriction
  on property:
    inverse of: inheresIn
  qualified cardinality: 1
  on class: UniversalInThe Particulars
type: NamedIndividual
type: Kind
comment: "Italos claims (p . 8.1-14) that both the universals in the particulars and the universals after the particulars differ from the universals before the particulars, because they both are later-born than the perceptible individuals (husterogen), can be predicted of them (kat goroumena), are inseparable from them (achrista ), and are acquired by our mind by abstraction (k at ’ aph airesin )."

A PARTICULAR thing
type: Class
subclass of: FunctionalComplex
subclass of: Restriction
  on property:
    inverse of: inheresIn
  qualified cardinality: 1
  on class: Perceptible
type: NamedIndividual
type: Kind

Perceptible
type: Class
subclass of: Quality
subclass of: Restriction
  on property: inheresIn
  min qualified cardinality: 1
  on class: A PARTICULAR thing
type: NamedIndividual
type: Kind

Universal
type: Class
subclass of: FunctionalComplex
type: NamedIndividual
type: Kind
comment: 'UNIVERSALs in the same order, but a certain detail of his account proves to be important. Italos, too, regards the universals before the many particulars the ca7uses (aitia/prtourga ) and paradigms (paradeigm ata) of perceptible individuals, which hence cannot be predicated of them, are separable from them (christa ), and in God’s mind (para/en t the), perfectly accommodating in this way the requirements of Christian Dogma (p p . 7.15-19 ; 29-32); but, then, he presents the distinction between the universals in the particulars and the universals after the particulars in a different manner."

UniversalAfterThe Particulars
type: Class
subclass of: UniversalInThe Particulars
type: NamedIndividual
type: SubKind
comment: "the UNIVERSALS AFTER THE PARTICULARS (epi tois pollo is), which concepts or thoughts."

UniversalBeforeTheParticulars
type: Class
subclass of: Universal
subclass of: Restriction
  on property: inheresIn
  min qualified cardinality: 1
  on class: Intelligible
type: NamedIndividual
type: SubKind
comment: 'the UNIVERSALs BEFORE THE many PARTICULARS (pro t n poll n ), which are generally identified with the Platonic Ideas"

UniversalInThe Particulars
type: Class
subclass of: UniversalBeforeTheParticulars
subclass of: Restriction
  on property: inheresIn
  min qualified cardinality: 1
  on class: Acquired-by-mindby
subclass of: Restriction
  on property: inheresIn
  min qualified cardinality: 1
  on class: Be- predicated
subclass of: Restriction
  on property: inheresIn
  min qualified cardinality: 1
  on class: Later-born
subclass of: Restriction
  on property:
    inverse of: inheresIn
  qualified cardinality: 1
  on class: Inseparable
type: NamedIndividual
type: SubKind
comment: "the UNIVERSALS IN ALL THE PARTICULARS (en tois pollo is), which represent Aristotle’s notion of immanent forms"