format-version: 1.2 data-version: releases/2015-03-10 subsetdef: bgee_not_trusted "Terms that are considered not trusted by the Bgee team, related to assertions needing additional support." default-namespace: cio ontology: cio owl-axioms: Prefix(owl:=)\nPrefix(rdf:=)\nPrefix(xml:=)\nPrefix(xsd:=)\nPrefix(rdfs:=)\n\n\nOntology(\nObjectPropertyDomain( ObjectIntersectionOf(ObjectAllValuesFrom( ObjectComplementOf()) ))\nObjectPropertyDomain( ObjectIntersectionOf(ObjectAllValuesFrom( ) ))\n) [Term] id: CIO:0000000 name: confidence information statement def: "A statement providing information about the confidence in an assertion, meaning, an information about the level of certainty that an assertion is correct." [Bgee:fbb] comment: Quality and confidence are distinct concepts: quality refers to the value of a source or of an annotation, whereas confidence refers to the level of certainty that an assertion is correct. disjoint_from: CIO:0000040 ! confidence information element relationship: has_confidence_element CIO:0000040 {maxCardinality="3"} ! confidence information element relationship: has_confidence_element CIO:0000040 {minCardinality="1"} ! confidence information element relationship: has_confidence_level CIO:0000028 {maxCardinality="1"} ! confidence level relationship: has_confidence_level CIO:0000028 {minCardinality="0"} ! confidence level relationship: has_evidence_concordance CIO:0000032 {cardinality="1"} ! evidence concordance relationship: has_evidence_type_concordance CIO:0000041 {maxCardinality="1"} ! evidence type concordance relationship: has_evidence_type_concordance CIO:0000041 {minCardinality="0"} ! evidence type concordance [Term] id: CIO:0000001 name: confidence statement from single evidence def: "A confidence information statement defined from a single evidence." [Bgee:fbb] is_a: CIO:0000000 ! confidence information statement disjoint_from: CIO:0000002 ! confidence statement from multiple evidence lines relationship: has_evidence_concordance CIO:0000042 ! single evidence relationship: has_evidence_type_concordance CIO:0000041 {cardinality="0"} ! evidence type concordance [Term] id: CIO:0000002 name: confidence statement from multiple evidence lines def: "A confidence information statement defined from a set of evidence lines." [Bgee:fbb] is_a: CIO:0000000 ! confidence information statement relationship: has_evidence_concordance CIO:0000043 ! concordance of multiple evidence lines relationship: has_evidence_type_concordance CIO:0000041 {cardinality="1"} ! evidence type concordance [Term] id: CIO:0000003 name: high confidence from single evidence def: "A confidence statement from single evidence related to assertions supported by a highly reliable evidence." [Bgee:fbb] synonym: "gold" RELATED [neXtProt] is_a: CIO:0000001 ! confidence statement from single evidence disjoint_from: CIO:0000004 ! medium confidence from single evidence disjoint_from: CIO:0000005 ! low confidence from single evidence disjoint_from: CIO:0000039 ! rejected relationship: has_confidence_level CIO:0000029 ! high confidence level [Term] id: CIO:0000004 name: medium confidence from single evidence def: "A confidence statement from single evidence related to assertions supported by moderately trusted evidence." [Bgee:fbb] synonym: "silver" RELATED [neXtProt] is_a: CIO:0000001 ! confidence statement from single evidence disjoint_from: CIO:0000005 ! low confidence from single evidence disjoint_from: CIO:0000039 ! rejected relationship: has_confidence_level CIO:0000030 ! medium confidence level [Term] id: CIO:0000005 name: low confidence from single evidence def: "A confidence statement from single evidence related to assertions supported by not-trusted evidence." [Bgee:fbb] subset: bgee_not_trusted synonym: "bronze" RELATED [neXtProt] is_a: CIO:0000001 ! confidence statement from single evidence disjoint_from: CIO:0000039 ! rejected relationship: has_confidence_level CIO:0000031 ! low confidence level [Term] id: CIO:0000006 name: confidence statement from multiple evidence lines of same type def: "A confidence statement from multiple evidence lines, all using a same experimental or computational type." [Bgee:fbb] is_a: CIO:0000002 ! confidence statement from multiple evidence lines disjoint_from: CIO:0000007 ! confidence statement from multiple evidence lines of multiple types relationship: has_evidence_type_concordance CIO:0000037 ! same type [Term] id: CIO:0000007 name: confidence statement from multiple evidence lines of multiple types def: "A confidence statement from multiple evidence lines, of different experimental or computational types." [Bgee:fbb] is_a: CIO:0000002 ! confidence statement from multiple evidence lines relationship: has_evidence_type_concordance CIO:0000038 ! different type [Term] id: CIO:0000008 name: confidence statement from congruent evidence lines of multiple types def: "A confidence statement from multiple evidence lines of multiple types, that are all congruent." [Bgee:fbb] is_a: CIO:0000007 ! confidence statement from multiple evidence lines of multiple types disjoint_from: CIO:0000009 ! confidence statement from conflicting evidence lines of multiple types relationship: has_evidence_concordance CIO:0000033 ! congruent [Term] id: CIO:0000009 name: confidence statement from conflicting evidence lines of multiple types def: "A confidence statement from multiple evidence lines of multiple types, some of which being contradictory." [Bgee:fbb] is_a: CIO:0000007 ! confidence statement from multiple evidence lines of multiple types relationship: has_evidence_concordance CIO:0000034 ! conflicting [Term] id: CIO:0000010 name: confidence statement from strongly conflicting evidence lines of multiple types def: "A confidence statement from conflicting evidence lines of multiple types, where evidence lines are in strong contradiction, meaning that the supporting evidence lines yield different conclusion, several of them being equally likely to be true." [Bgee:fbb] subset: bgee_not_trusted is_a: CIO:0000009 ! confidence statement from conflicting evidence lines of multiple types disjoint_from: CIO:0000011 ! confidence statement from weakly conflicting evidence lines of multiple types relationship: has_confidence_level CIO:0000028 {cardinality="0"} ! confidence level relationship: has_evidence_concordance CIO:0000035 ! strongly conflicting [Term] id: CIO:0000011 name: confidence statement from weakly conflicting evidence lines of multiple types def: "A confidence statement from conflicting evidence lines of multiple types, where evidence lines are in weak contradiction, meaning that the overall supported assertion is believed to be true, but a subset of less-reliable evidence lines are in contradiction." [Bgee:fbb] is_a: CIO:0000009 ! confidence statement from conflicting evidence lines of multiple types relationship: has_evidence_concordance CIO:0000036 ! weakly conflicting [Term] id: CIO:0000012 name: confidence statement from congruent evidence lines of multiple types, overall confidence high def: "A confidence statement from congruent evidence lines of multiple types, of an overall high confidence level." [Bgee:fbb] comment: Different strategies can be used to define the overall confidence level: for instance, it could be defined based on the confidence level of the most trusted evidence, from the set of evidence lines supporting the assertion; or, it could be defined based on the number of evidence lines supporting the assertion (e.g., 10 congruent low-confidence evidence lines could allow to have an overall high confidence in an assertion). It is the responsibility of annotation teams to define and communicate the parameters, pertinent to their field, allowing to produce overall confidence levels. is_a: CIO:0000008 ! confidence statement from congruent evidence lines of multiple types disjoint_from: CIO:0000013 ! confidence statement from congruent evidence lines of multiple types, overall confidence medium disjoint_from: CIO:0000014 ! confidence statement from congruent evidence lines of multiple types, overall confidence low relationship: has_confidence_level CIO:0000029 ! high confidence level [Term] id: CIO:0000013 name: confidence statement from congruent evidence lines of multiple types, overall confidence medium def: "A confidence statement from congruent evidence lines of multiple types, of an overall moderately trusted confidence level." [Bgee:fbb] comment: Different strategies can be used to define the overall confidence level: for instance, it could be defined based on the confidence level of the most trusted evidence, from the set of evidence lines supporting the assertion; or, it could be defined based on the number of evidence lines supporting the assertion (e.g., 10 congruent low-confidence evidence lines could allow to have an overall high confidence in an assertion). It is the responsibility of annotation teams to define and communicate the parameters, pertinent to their field, allowing to produce overall confidence levels. is_a: CIO:0000008 ! confidence statement from congruent evidence lines of multiple types disjoint_from: CIO:0000014 ! confidence statement from congruent evidence lines of multiple types, overall confidence low relationship: has_confidence_level CIO:0000030 ! medium confidence level [Term] id: CIO:0000014 name: confidence statement from congruent evidence lines of multiple types, overall confidence low def: "A confidence statement from congruent evidence lines of multiple types, of an overall not-trusted confidence level." [Bgee:fbb] comment: Different strategies can be used to define the overall confidence level: for instance, it could be defined based on the confidence level of the most trusted evidence, from the set of evidence lines supporting the assertion; or, it could be defined based on the number of evidence lines supporting the assertion (e.g., 10 congruent low-confidence evidence lines could allow to have an overall high confidence in an assertion). It is the responsibility of annotation teams to define and communicate the parameters, pertinent to their field, allowing to produce overall confidence levels. is_a: CIO:0000008 ! confidence statement from congruent evidence lines of multiple types relationship: has_confidence_level CIO:0000031 ! low confidence level [Term] id: CIO:0000015 name: confidence statement from conflicting evidence lines of same type def: "Confidence statement from multiple evidence lines of same type, some of which being contradictory." [Bgee:fbb] is_a: CIO:0000006 ! confidence statement from multiple evidence lines of same type disjoint_from: CIO:0000016 ! confidence statement from congruent evidence lines of same type relationship: has_evidence_concordance CIO:0000034 ! conflicting [Term] id: CIO:0000016 name: confidence statement from congruent evidence lines of same type def: "Confidence statement from multiple evidence lines of same type, that are all congruent." [Bgee:fbb] is_a: CIO:0000006 ! confidence statement from multiple evidence lines of same type relationship: has_evidence_concordance CIO:0000033 ! congruent [Term] id: CIO:0000017 name: confidence statement from congruent evidence lines of same type, overall confidence high def: "A confidence statement from congruent evidence lines of same type, of an overall high confidence level." [Bgee:fbb] comment: Different strategies can be used to define the overall confidence level: for instance, it could be defined based on the confidence level of the most trusted evidence, from the set of evidence lines supporting the assertion; or, it could be defined based on the number of evidence lines supporting the assertion (e.g., 10 congruent low-confidence evidence lines could allow to have an overall high confidence in an assertion). It is the responsibility of annotation teams to define and communicate the parameters, pertinent to their field, allowing to produce overall confidence levels. is_a: CIO:0000016 ! confidence statement from congruent evidence lines of same type disjoint_from: CIO:0000018 ! confidence statement from congruent evidence lines of same type, overall confidence low disjoint_from: CIO:0000019 ! confidence statement from congruent evidence lines of same type, overall confidence medium relationship: has_confidence_level CIO:0000029 ! high confidence level [Term] id: CIO:0000018 name: confidence statement from congruent evidence lines of same type, overall confidence low def: "A confidence statement from congruent evidence lines of same type, of an overall not-trusted confidence level." [Bgee:fbb] comment: Different strategies can be used to define the overall confidence level: for instance, it could be defined based on the confidence level of the most trusted evidence, from the set of evidence lines supporting the assertion; or, it could be defined based on the number of evidence lines supporting the assertion (e.g., 10 congruent low-confidence evidence lines could allow to have an overall high confidence in an assertion). It is the responsibility of annotation teams to define and communicate the parameters, pertinent to their field, allowing to produce overall confidence levels. is_a: CIO:0000016 ! confidence statement from congruent evidence lines of same type disjoint_from: CIO:0000019 ! confidence statement from congruent evidence lines of same type, overall confidence medium relationship: has_confidence_level CIO:0000031 ! low confidence level [Term] id: CIO:0000019 name: confidence statement from congruent evidence lines of same type, overall confidence medium def: "A confidence statement from congruent evidence lines of same type, of an overall moderately trusted confidence level." [Bgee:fbb] comment: Different strategies can be used to define the overall confidence level: for instance, it could be defined based on the confidence level of the most trusted evidence, from the set of evidence lines supporting the assertion; or, it could be defined based on the number of evidence lines supporting the assertion (e.g., 10 congruent low-confidence evidence lines could allow to have an overall high confidence in an assertion). It is the responsibility of annotation teams to define and communicate the parameters, pertinent to their field, allowing to produce overall confidence levels. is_a: CIO:0000016 ! confidence statement from congruent evidence lines of same type relationship: has_confidence_level CIO:0000030 ! medium confidence level [Term] id: CIO:0000020 name: confidence statement from strongly conflicting evidence lines of same type def: "Confidence statement from conflicting evidence lines of same type, where evidence lines are in strong contradiction, meaning that the supporting evidence lines yield different conclusion, several of them being equally likely to be true." [Bgee:fbb] subset: bgee_not_trusted is_a: CIO:0000015 ! confidence statement from conflicting evidence lines of same type disjoint_from: CIO:0000021 ! confidence statement from weakly conflicting evidence lines of same type relationship: has_confidence_level CIO:0000028 {cardinality="0"} ! confidence level relationship: has_evidence_concordance CIO:0000035 ! strongly conflicting [Term] id: CIO:0000021 name: confidence statement from weakly conflicting evidence lines of same type def: "Confidence statement from conflicting evidence lines of same type, where evidence lines are in weak contradiction, meaning that the overall supported assertion is believed to be true, but a subset of less-reliable evidence lines are in contradiction." [Bgee:fbb] is_a: CIO:0000015 ! confidence statement from conflicting evidence lines of same type relationship: has_evidence_concordance CIO:0000036 ! weakly conflicting [Term] id: CIO:0000022 name: confidence statement from weakly conflicting evidence lines of same type, overall confidence high def: "Confidence statement from weakly conflicting evidence lines of same type, of an overall high confidence level." [Bgee:fbb] comment: Different strategies can be used to define the overall confidence level: for instance, it could be defined based on the confidence level of the most trusted evidence, from the set of evidence lines supporting (not contradicting) the assertion; or, it could be defined based on the number of evidence lines supporting the assertion (e.g., 10 congruent low-confidence evidence lines could allow to have an overall high confidence in an assertion, even if contradicted by one other low-confidence evidence). It is the responsibility of annotation teams to define and communicate the parameters, pertinent to their field, allowing to produce overall confidence levels. is_a: CIO:0000021 ! confidence statement from weakly conflicting evidence lines of same type disjoint_from: CIO:0000023 ! confidence statement from weakly conflicting evidence lines of same type, overall confidence low disjoint_from: CIO:0000024 ! confidence statement from weakly conflicting evidence lines of same type, overall confidence medium relationship: has_confidence_level CIO:0000029 ! high confidence level [Term] id: CIO:0000023 name: confidence statement from weakly conflicting evidence lines of same type, overall confidence low def: "Confidence statement from weakly conflicting evidence lines of same type, of an overall not-trusted confidence level." [Bgee:fbb] comment: Different strategies can be used to define the overall confidence level: for instance, it could be defined based on the confidence level of the most trusted evidence, from the set of evidence lines supporting (not contradicting) the assertion; or, it could be defined based on the number of evidence lines supporting the assertion (e.g., 10 congruent low-confidence evidence lines could allow to have an overall high confidence in an assertion, even if contradicted by one other low-confidence evidence). It is the responsibility of annotation teams to define and communicate the parameters, pertinent to their field, allowing to produce overall confidence levels. subset: bgee_not_trusted is_a: CIO:0000021 ! confidence statement from weakly conflicting evidence lines of same type disjoint_from: CIO:0000024 ! confidence statement from weakly conflicting evidence lines of same type, overall confidence medium relationship: has_confidence_level CIO:0000031 ! low confidence level [Term] id: CIO:0000024 name: confidence statement from weakly conflicting evidence lines of same type, overall confidence medium def: "Confidence statement from weakly conflicting evidence lines of same type, of an overall moderately trusted confidence level." [Bgee:fbb] comment: Different strategies can be used to define the overall confidence level: for instance, it could be defined based on the confidence level of the most trusted evidence, from the set of evidence lines supporting (not contradicting) the assertion; or, it could be defined based on the number of evidence lines supporting the assertion (e.g., 10 congruent low-confidence evidence lines could allow to have an overall high confidence in an assertion, even if contradicted by one other low-confidence evidence). It is the responsibility of annotation teams to define and communicate the parameters, pertinent to their field, allowing to produce overall confidence levels. is_a: CIO:0000021 ! confidence statement from weakly conflicting evidence lines of same type relationship: has_confidence_level CIO:0000030 ! medium confidence level [Term] id: CIO:0000025 name: confidence statement from weakly conflicting evidence lines of multiple types, overall confidence high def: "Confidence statement from weakly conflicting evidence lines of multiple types, of an overall high confidence level." [Bgee:fbb] comment: Different strategies can be used to define the overall confidence level: for instance, it could be defined based on the confidence level of the most trusted evidence, from the set of evidence lines supporting (not contradicting) the assertion; or, it could be defined based on the number of evidence lines supporting the assertion (e.g., 10 congruent low-confidence evidence lines could allow to have an overall high confidence in an assertion, even if contradicted by one other low-confidence evidence). It is the responsibility of annotation teams to define and communicate the parameters, pertinent to their field, allowing to produce overall confidence levels. is_a: CIO:0000011 ! confidence statement from weakly conflicting evidence lines of multiple types disjoint_from: CIO:0000026 ! confidence statement from weakly conflicting evidence lines of multiple types, overall confidence low disjoint_from: CIO:0000027 ! confidence statement from weakly conflicting evidence lines of multiple types, overall confidence medium relationship: has_confidence_level CIO:0000029 ! high confidence level [Term] id: CIO:0000026 name: confidence statement from weakly conflicting evidence lines of multiple types, overall confidence low def: "Confidence statement from weakly conflicting evidence lines of multiple types, of an overall not-trusted confidence level." [Bgee:fbb] comment: Different strategies can be used to define the overall confidence level: for instance, it could be defined based on the confidence level of the most trusted evidence, from the set of evidence lines supporting (not contradicting) the assertion; or, it could be defined based on the number of evidence lines supporting the assertion (e.g., 10 congruent low-confidence evidence lines could allow to have an overall high confidence in an assertion, even if contradicted by one other low-confidence evidence). It is the responsibility of annotation teams to define and communicate the parameters, pertinent to their field, allowing to produce overall confidence levels. subset: bgee_not_trusted is_a: CIO:0000011 ! confidence statement from weakly conflicting evidence lines of multiple types disjoint_from: CIO:0000027 ! confidence statement from weakly conflicting evidence lines of multiple types, overall confidence medium relationship: has_confidence_level CIO:0000031 ! low confidence level [Term] id: CIO:0000027 name: confidence statement from weakly conflicting evidence lines of multiple types, overall confidence medium def: "Confidence statement from weakly conflicting evidence lines of multiple types, of an overall moderately trusted confidence level." [Bgee:fbb] comment: Different strategies can be used to define the overall confidence level: for instance, it could be defined based on the confidence level of the most trusted evidence, from the set of evidence lines supporting (not contradicting) the assertion; or, it could be defined based on the number of evidence lines supporting the assertion (e.g., 10 congruent low-confidence evidence lines could allow to have an overall high confidence in an assertion, even if contradicted by one other low-confidence evidence). It is the responsibility of annotation teams to define and communicate the parameters, pertinent to their field, allowing to produce overall confidence levels. is_a: CIO:0000011 ! confidence statement from weakly conflicting evidence lines of multiple types relationship: has_confidence_level CIO:0000030 ! medium confidence level [Term] id: CIO:0000028 name: confidence level def: "A confidence information element representing the different levels of confidence, used to compose confidence information statements." [Bgee:fbb] is_a: CIO:0000040 ! confidence information element disjoint_from: CIO:0000032 ! evidence concordance disjoint_from: CIO:0000041 ! evidence type concordance [Term] id: CIO:0000029 name: high confidence level def: "A confidence level representing a high trust in an evidence." [Bgee:fbb] is_a: CIO:0000028 ! confidence level disjoint_from: CIO:0000030 ! medium confidence level disjoint_from: CIO:0000031 ! low confidence level relationship: provides_greater_confidence_than CIO:0000030 ! medium confidence level [Term] id: CIO:0000030 name: medium confidence level def: "A confidence level representing a moderate trust in an evidence." [Bgee:fbb] is_a: CIO:0000028 ! confidence level disjoint_from: CIO:0000031 ! low confidence level relationship: provides_greater_confidence_than CIO:0000031 ! low confidence level [Term] id: CIO:0000031 name: low confidence level def: "A confidence level representing an absence of trust in an evidence." [Bgee:fbb] is_a: CIO:0000028 ! confidence level [Term] id: CIO:0000032 name: evidence concordance def: "A confidence information element representing the type of concordance of evidence lines supporting an assertion, used to compose confidence information statements." [Bgee:fbb] comment: Subclasses are used to define whether there is a single evidence, or multiple evidence lines, in support of an assertion, and whether they are congruent or conflicting. is_a: CIO:0000040 ! confidence information element disjoint_from: CIO:0000041 ! evidence type concordance [Term] id: CIO:0000033 name: congruent def: "An evidence concordance of multiple evidence lines that are congruent." [Bgee:fbb] comment: The assumption here is that assertions supported by a single evidence are less trustworthy than assertions supported by multiple evidence lines. is_a: CIO:0000043 ! concordance of multiple evidence lines disjoint_from: CIO:0000034 ! conflicting [Term] id: CIO:0000034 name: conflicting def: "An evidence concordance of multiple evidence lines that are conflicting." [Bgee:fbb] comment: An assertion can have several related evidence lines, some supporting the assertion, and some rejecting the assertion (e.g., using the NOT qualifier in GO annotations). is_a: CIO:0000043 ! concordance of multiple evidence lines [Term] id: CIO:0000035 name: strongly conflicting def: "A conflicting concordance for evidence lines that are strongly conflicting." [Bgee:fbb] comment: We distinguish two levels of conflict: weak conflict between evidence lines, e.g., a low confidence evidence negating an assertion, versus several high confidence evidence lines supporting the assertion; and strong conflict between evidence lines, e.g., two high confidence evidence lines contradicting each other. Note that strongly conflicting evidence lines are not used to produce confidence information statements associated to a confidence level (low, medium, high): in that case, the supported assertion is believed to need further validation, as evidence lines yield different conclusions of similar confidence. is_a: CIO:0000034 ! conflicting disjoint_from: CIO:0000036 ! weakly conflicting [Term] id: CIO:0000036 name: weakly conflicting def: "A conflicting concordance for evidence lines that are weakly conflicting." [Bgee:fbb] comment: We distinguish two levels of conflict: weak conflict between evidence lines, e.g., a low confidence evidence negating an assertion, versus several high confidence evidence lines supporting the assertion; and strong conflict between evidence lines, e.g., two high confidence evidence lines contradicting each other. is_a: CIO:0000034 ! conflicting [Term] id: CIO:0000037 name: same type def: "An evidence type concordance for evidence lines that are from a same type." [Bgee:fbb] is_a: CIO:0000041 ! evidence type concordance disjoint_from: CIO:0000038 ! different type [Term] id: CIO:0000038 name: different type def: "An evidence type concordance for evidence lines that are from different types." [Bgee:fbb] is_a: CIO:0000041 ! evidence type concordance [Term] id: CIO:0000039 name: rejected def: "A confidence statement from single evidence related to assertions that have been rejected, for instance, following paper retraction, author misinterpretation, or curator misinterpretation." [Bgee:fbb] comment: When results are retracted, associated annotations are often removed. Consequently, end-users might not be aware that the result was annotated. Annotating an assertion with this confidence term allows to keep the information available. Such assertions should not interfer with aggregation of multiple evidence lines to generate a confidence level from the branch CIO:0000002 "confidence from multiple evidence lines". This is different from negative annotations, used to negate the interpretation of an annotation. It is also different from conflicting multiple evidence lines, where each single evidence has not been directly invalidated. Rejection is a stronger assertion about an annotation source than conflict, capturing that this evidence should no longer be used. is_a: CIO:0000001 ! confidence statement from single evidence [Term] id: CIO:0000040 name: confidence information element def: "Confidence information element represent intrinsic properties of confidence information statements, allowing to compose them." [Bgee:fbb] [Term] id: CIO:0000041 name: evidence type concordance def: "A confidence information element representing the concordance of experimental or computational types of evidence lines supporting an assertion, used to compose confidence information statements." [Bgee:fbb] comment: The assumption here is that assertions supported by evidence lines of different experimental or computational types are more trustworthy than assertions supported by evidence lines of a same experimental or computational type. is_a: CIO:0000040 ! confidence information element [Term] id: CIO:0000042 name: single evidence def: "An evidence concordance for confidence information about an assertion produced from a single evidence." [Bgee:fbb] comment: The assumption here is that assertions supported by a single evidence are less trustworthy than assertions supported by multiple evidence lines. is_a: CIO:0000032 ! evidence concordance disjoint_from: CIO:0000043 ! concordance of multiple evidence lines [Term] id: CIO:0000043 name: concordance of multiple evidence lines def: "An evidence concordance for confidence information about an assertion produced from multiple evidence lines." [Bgee:fbb] comment: The assumption here is that assertions supported by a single evidence are less trustworthy than assertions supported by multiple evidence lines. is_a: CIO:0000032 ! evidence concordance [Typedef] id: has_confidence_element name: has confidence element def: "X has confidence element Y iff X is a confidence information statement and Y is an associated confidence information element, used to define the statement." [] domain: CIO:0000000 ! confidence information statement range: CIO:0000040 ! confidence information element [Typedef] id: has_confidence_level name: has confidence level def: "X has confidence level Y iff X is a confidence information statement and Y is it associated confidence information level." [] range: CIO:0000028 ! confidence level is_a: has_confidence_element ! has confidence element [Typedef] id: has_evidence_concordance name: has evidence concordance def: "X has evidence concordance Y iff X is a confidence information statement and Y is it associated evidence concordance." [] domain: CIO:0000000 ! confidence information statement range: CIO:0000032 ! evidence concordance is_a: has_confidence_element ! has confidence element [Typedef] id: has_evidence_type_concordance name: has evidence type concordance def: "X has evidence type concordance Y iff X is a confidence information statement and Y is it associated evidence type concordance." [] range: CIO:0000041 ! evidence type concordance is_a: has_confidence_element ! has confidence element [Typedef] id: provides_greater_confidence_than name: provides greater confidence than def: "X provides greater confidence than Y iff both X and Y provide a confidence information level, and the level of confidence provided by X is greater than the level of confidence provided by Y." [] domain: CIO:0000028 ! confidence level range: CIO:0000028 ! confidence level is_transitive: true