--- name: linkedin-authority-builder description: Build a LinkedIn content system for thought leadership. Use when someone needs to establish authority, attract inbound leads, or build a consistent content presence. Covers positioning, content pillars, formats, and posting rhythm. --- # LinkedIn Authority Builder Here's what most people get wrong about LinkedIn: they're trying to go viral. Viral doesn't pay your bills. Being remembered by the right 500 people when they need what you do — that pays your bills. This skill builds a content system around consistent positioning and clear pillars — not hacks. --- ## Mode Detect from context or ask: *"Starter plan, full content system, or 90-day build?"* | Mode | What you get | Best for | |------|-------------|----------| | `quick` | 3 content pillars + 1-week posting starter plan | Getting unstuck, first week of consistency | | `standard` | Full content system: pillars, formats, posting rhythm + first week written | Building a repeatable presence | | `deep` | Full system + 90-day calendar + 10 posts written + engagement playbook | Serious authority-building campaign | **Default: `standard`** — use `quick` if they just need to start posting. Use `deep` if they're committing to LinkedIn as a growth channel. --- ## Context Loading Gates **Before generating any strategy, load:** - [ ] **Current positioning:** One-liner, ICP, key differentiator (load from `positioning-basics` output if available) - [ ] **Target audience on LinkedIn:** Specific titles, company stages, industries - [ ] **Posting history:** What have they tried? What worked? What didn't? - [ ] **Content goals:** Leads / job offers / speaking / partnerships / audience growth - [ ] **Available time per week:** Hours they can realistically commit **Sequencing gate:** If positioning isn't clear yet, stop and ask: > "Before building a content strategy, I need your one-liner: 'I help [specific audience] with [specific outcome] through [unique approach].' Do you have this locked, or should we nail positioning first with `positioning-basics`?" Do not build a content system for an unclear position — the content will be unfocused. **Also suggest:** > "Run `linkedin-profile-optimizer` if you haven't — the content we build needs a profile that converts the traffic." --- ## Phase 1: Positioning Alignment Analysis Before recommending any content, reason through: 1. **Positioning check:** Is the one-liner specific enough to anchor content pillars? If it's "I help businesses grow," that's too vague — push for specificity before proceeding. 2. **Audience clarity:** Are we targeting a specific title + company stage, or a demographic? Specific is better. 3. **Time-to-output match:** If they have 2 hours/week, don't recommend 5 posts/week. Sustainability matters more than ambition. 4. **Goal alignment:** Content for lead generation looks different from content for speaking gigs. Confirm goal before building pillars. Output a brief strategy assessment: > "You're a [role] targeting [audience] with [X hours/week] and a goal of [outcome]. I'll build a [3/5 post/week] strategy anchored to [X] pillars. The main gap in your current approach: [specific gap]." --- ## Phase 2: Content Pillars (3–5 Required) Each pillar must pass all 4 tests: 1. You have genuine expertise (not just interest) 2. Your target audience actively cares about it 3. You can produce content on it consistently for 6+ months 4. It connects to what you sell or want to be known for **Pillar ratio:** - 70% core expertise → builds authority - 20% adjacent insights → makes you interesting - 10% personal → makes you relatable **Output format per pillar:** ``` Pillar: [Name] Ratio: [%] Content types: [frameworks / stories / case studies] Example hook: "[First line of a real post]" Connection to goal: [how this drives the stated outcome] ``` --- ## Phase 3: Format Selection & Post Templates ### Format-to-Goal Mapping | Format | Best For | Engagement Level | |---|---|---| | Story | Connection, memorability | High | | Framework/List | Authority, credibility | High | | Hot take | Reach, visibility | Variable | | Case study/proof | Credibility, late-stage trust | Medium | | Behind-the-scenes | Relatability, trust | Medium | **Recommended weekly mix:** - 2–3 frameworks (authority) - 1–2 stories (connection) - 1 proof point (credibility) ### Post Templates **Story Post:** ``` [Hook — the moment or realization] [Setup — quick context] [Tension — what was hard or went wrong] [Turn — the insight] [Lesson — the takeaway] [Question — drives engagement] ``` **Framework Post:** ``` [Hook — bold claim or problem statement] [Why this matters — 1-2 sentences] [The X-step framework:] 1. [Step + brief explanation] 2. [Step + brief explanation] 3. [Step + brief explanation] [Key insight or summary] [CTA or discussion question] ``` **Hot Take:** ``` [Controversial statement] [Your reasoning — 2-3 sentences] [The nuance people miss] [What to do instead] [Question to drive comments] ``` --- ## Phase 4: Content Calendar with Real Dates Generate a 4-week calendar with actual dates (not generic day names): | Date | Pillar | Format | Hook (first line) | Status | |---|---|---|---|---| | [YYYY-MM-DD] | [Pillar] | Framework | "[First line]" | Draft | | [YYYY-MM-DD] | [Pillar] | Story | "[First line]" | Draft | Fill 4 full weeks. Generic "Week 1, Monday" output is not sufficient. Also output **5 starter post hooks** ready to write immediately — these break the blank-page problem: ``` 1. [Hook] 2. [Hook] 3. [Hook] 4. [Hook] 5. [Hook] ``` --- ## Phase 5: Self-Critique Pass (REQUIRED) After generating the strategy, evaluate: - [ ] Is the positioning one-liner specific enough to anchor the pillars? - [ ] Are the 5 starter hooks actually strong — would they stop the scroll? - [ ] Does the time commitment match the user's stated available hours? - [ ] Is at least one pillar directly tied to the revenue/goal outcome? - [ ] Does the calendar have actual dates, or just generic "Day 1/Day 3" placeholders? - [ ] Would this content system still work in 6 months if the user stays consistent? Flag issues: "Pillar 3 ('general business tips') doesn't connect to your stated goal of attracting SaaS founders. Replace with something more specific." --- ## Phase 6: 30-Day Iteration Protocol After 30 days, review with these questions: - Which posts got the most comments? What pillar did they fall under? - Which posts drove DMs or profile views? - Which posts got the most impressions regardless of engagement? **Adjust based on data:** - If case study posts outperform frameworks → increase case study ratio - If stories drive DMs but frameworks drive impressions → use both intentionally --- ## Output Structure ```markdown ## LinkedIn Strategy: [Name] — [Date] ### Positioning Alignment [One-liner + assessment of clarity] ### Content Pillars [3-5 pillars with ratio, examples, connection to goal] ### Weekly Rhythm - Posts/week: [X] - Best times: [e.g., Tue/Thu 8am EST] - Active commenting: [X min/day] ### Format Mix [Breakdown with rationale] ### 4-Week Content Calendar [Table with real dates + hooks] ### 5 Starter Posts (Write These First) [Hooks with format labels] ### Engagement Plan [Who to engage with, how much time, what to say] ### Self-Critique Notes [Issues flagged + recommended fixes] ### 30-Day Review Triggers [What to measure and when to adjust] ### Cross-References - linkedin-profile-optimizer (run before publishing) - content-idea-generator (for ongoing idea generation) - voice-extractor (to ensure posts sound authentic) ``` --- *Skill by Brian Wagner | AI Marketing Architect | brianrwagner.com*