---
name: advisor-due-diligence
description: Build an evidence-grounded advisor review covering identity, research direction, recruitment signals, lab context, source gaps, and community risk signals. Use when deciding whether to investigate or contact a graduate advisor.
---

# Advisor Due Diligence

1. Confirm one advisor identity and keep a stable `advisor_id`.
2. Separate official facts, public academic evidence, user-supplied material, and community risk signals.
3. Prefer official pages and publications; record source refs and freshness for every conclusion.
4. Treat community content as a risk signal or follow-up question, never as an established fact.
5. Return a candidate report with evidence coverage, conflicts, unknowns, and suggested questions.

Do not write application outcomes, confirmed facts, or tracker state automatically. Do not contact the advisor.

## 中文说明

1. 确认单一导师身份，并保留稳定 `advisor_id`。
2. 分离官方事实、公开学术证据、用户提供材料和社区风险信号。
3. 优先使用官网和论文；每个结论记录 source refs 与 freshness。
4. 社区内容只能是风险信号或后续问题，不能作为既定事实。
5. 返回包含证据覆盖、冲突、未知项与建议问题的 candidate 报告。

不得自动写入申请 outcome、confirmed facts 或 tracker 状态，也不得联系导师。