1
00:00:01,100 --> 00:00:04,519

covering the week's top textbooks like

2
00:00:04,519 --> 00:00:04,529
covering the week's top textbooks like
 

3
00:00:04,529 --> 00:00:07,849
covering the week's top textbooks like
Linux - Tim Hortons is facing a

4
00:00:07,849 --> 00:00:07,859
Linux - Tim Hortons is facing a
 

5
00:00:07,859 --> 00:00:10,339
Linux - Tim Hortons is facing a
class-action lawsuit in Quebec over data

6
00:00:10,339 --> 00:00:10,349
class-action lawsuit in Quebec over data
 

7
00:00:10,349 --> 00:00:11,930
class-action lawsuit in Quebec over data
collection issues in the company's

8
00:00:11,930 --> 00:00:11,940
collection issues in the company's
 

9
00:00:11,940 --> 00:00:14,660
collection issues in the company's
mobile ordering app filed a day after

10
00:00:14,660 --> 00:00:14,670
mobile ordering app filed a day after
 

11
00:00:14,670 --> 00:00:17,029
mobile ordering app filed a day after
for privacy watchdogs announced a joint

12
00:00:17,029 --> 00:00:17,039
for privacy watchdogs announced a joint
 

13
00:00:17,039 --> 00:00:19,400
for privacy watchdogs announced a joint
investigation into the company's

14
00:00:19,400 --> 00:00:19,410
investigation into the company's
 

15
00:00:19,410 --> 00:00:22,550
investigation into the company's
overreach the court application filed by

16
00:00:22,550 --> 00:00:22,560
overreach the court application filed by
 

17
00:00:22,560 --> 00:00:25,070
overreach the court application filed by
to Montreal based law firms on Tuesday

18
00:00:25,070 --> 00:00:25,080
to Montreal based law firms on Tuesday
 

19
00:00:25,080 --> 00:00:27,380
to Montreal based law firms on Tuesday
cites an investigative story by the

20
00:00:27,380 --> 00:00:27,390
cites an investigative story by the
 

21
00:00:27,390 --> 00:00:29,720
cites an investigative story by the
Financial Post which revealed the Tim

22
00:00:29,720 --> 00:00:29,730
Financial Post which revealed the Tim
 

23
00:00:29,730 --> 00:00:32,690
Financial Post which revealed the Tim
Hortons app was logging users location

24
00:00:32,690 --> 00:00:32,700
Hortons app was logging users location
 

25
00:00:32,700 --> 00:00:34,970
Hortons app was logging users location
data in the background even when the app

26
00:00:34,970 --> 00:00:34,980
data in the background even when the app
 

27
00:00:34,980 --> 00:00:38,150
data in the background even when the app
wasn't open the app was streaming GPS

28
00:00:38,150 --> 00:00:38,160
wasn't open the app was streaming GPS
 

29
00:00:38,160 --> 00:00:40,639
wasn't open the app was streaming GPS
location data to radar Labs Inc an

30
00:00:40,639 --> 00:00:40,649
location data to radar Labs Inc an
 

31
00:00:40,649 --> 00:00:43,310
location data to radar Labs Inc an
American company which analyzes location

32
00:00:43,310 --> 00:00:43,320
American company which analyzes location
 

33
00:00:43,320 --> 00:00:46,190
American company which analyzes location
data to infer where users live and work

34
00:00:46,190 --> 00:00:46,200
data to infer where users live and work
 

35
00:00:46,200 --> 00:00:49,160
data to infer where users live and work
and logs a person's visits to one of Tim

36
00:00:49,160 --> 00:00:49,170
and logs a person's visits to one of Tim
 

37
00:00:49,170 --> 00:00:52,250
and logs a person's visits to one of Tim
Hortons competitors such as Starbucks or

38
00:00:52,250 --> 00:00:52,260
Hortons competitors such as Starbucks or
 

39
00:00:52,260 --> 00:00:55,520
Hortons competitors such as Starbucks or
McDonald's Corp immediately after

40
00:00:55,520 --> 00:00:55,530
McDonald's Corp immediately after
 

41
00:00:55,530 --> 00:00:57,229
McDonald's Corp immediately after
privacy commissioners for the federal

42
00:00:57,229 --> 00:00:57,239
privacy commissioners for the federal
 

43
00:00:57,239 --> 00:01:00,349
privacy commissioners for the federal
government Quebec Alberta and British

44
00:01:00,349 --> 00:01:00,359
government Quebec Alberta and British
 

45
00:01:00,359 --> 00:01:02,029
government Quebec Alberta and British
Columbia announced their joint

46
00:01:02,029 --> 00:01:02,039
Columbia announced their joint
 

47
00:01:02,039 --> 00:01:04,850
Columbia announced their joint
investigation on Monday Tim Hortons said

48
00:01:04,850 --> 00:01:04,860
investigation on Monday Tim Hortons said
 

49
00:01:04,860 --> 00:01:06,800
investigation on Monday Tim Hortons said
in a statement that it has discontinued

50
00:01:06,800 --> 00:01:06,810
in a statement that it has discontinued
 

51
00:01:06,810 --> 00:01:08,570
in a statement that it has discontinued
its practice of tracking losing users

52
00:01:08,570 --> 00:01:08,580
its practice of tracking losing users
 

53
00:01:08,580 --> 00:01:11,750
its practice of tracking losing users
location when the app is not open the

54
00:01:11,750 --> 00:01:11,760
location when the app is not open the
 

55
00:01:11,760 --> 00:01:13,550
location when the app is not open the
lead plaintiff is a Montreal resident

56
00:01:13,550 --> 00:01:13,560
lead plaintiff is a Montreal resident
 

57
00:01:13,560 --> 00:01:16,130
lead plaintiff is a Montreal resident
who works in the IT sector and even

58
00:01:16,130 --> 00:01:16,140
who works in the IT sector and even
 

59
00:01:16,140 --> 00:01:17,960
who works in the IT sector and even
though defined by his lawyer as a tech

60
00:01:17,960 --> 00:01:17,970
though defined by his lawyer as a tech
 

61
00:01:17,970 --> 00:01:20,120
though defined by his lawyer as a tech
savvy guy he was shocked to find out how

62
00:01:20,120 --> 00:01:20,130
savvy guy he was shocked to find out how
 

63
00:01:20,130 --> 00:01:22,760
savvy guy he was shocked to find out how
the app was tracking him consumer

64
00:01:22,760 --> 00:01:22,770
the app was tracking him consumer
 

65
00:01:22,770 --> 00:01:25,310
the app was tracking him consumer
protection lawyer Joey Zuk Zuk Rijn said

66
00:01:25,310 --> 00:01:25,320
protection lawyer Joey Zuk Zuk Rijn said
 

67
00:01:25,320 --> 00:01:27,109
protection lawyer Joey Zuk Zuk Rijn said
that simply stopping the practice of

68
00:01:27,109 --> 00:01:27,119
that simply stopping the practice of
 

69
00:01:27,119 --> 00:01:29,060
that simply stopping the practice of
background location tracking isn't

70
00:01:29,060 --> 00:01:29,070
background location tracking isn't
 

71
00:01:29,070 --> 00:01:31,219
background location tracking isn't
enough because Tim Hortons parent

72
00:01:31,219 --> 00:01:31,229
enough because Tim Hortons parent
 

73
00:01:31,229 --> 00:01:32,749
enough because Tim Hortons parent
company appears to have been tracking

74
00:01:32,749 --> 00:01:32,759
company appears to have been tracking
 

75
00:01:32,759 --> 00:01:35,179
company appears to have been tracking
the lead plaintiff since last year and

76
00:01:35,179 --> 00:01:35,189
the lead plaintiff since last year and
 

77
00:01:35,189 --> 00:01:37,179
the lead plaintiff since last year and
the damage is already done

78
00:01:37,179 --> 00:01:37,189
the damage is already done
 

79
00:01:37,189 --> 00:01:39,469
the damage is already done
saccharin says they've gained a valuable

80
00:01:39,469 --> 00:01:39,479
saccharin says they've gained a valuable
 

81
00:01:39,479 --> 00:01:41,450
saccharin says they've gained a valuable
database of information and behavior

82
00:01:41,450 --> 00:01:41,460
database of information and behavior
 

83
00:01:41,460 --> 00:01:43,580
database of information and behavior
patterns and activities of individuals

84
00:01:43,580 --> 00:01:43,590
patterns and activities of individuals
 

85
00:01:43,590 --> 00:01:45,649
patterns and activities of individuals
so are they now just going to throw that

86
00:01:45,649 --> 00:01:45,659
so are they now just going to throw that
 

87
00:01:45,659 --> 00:01:47,780
so are they now just going to throw that
out or are they going to profit from it

88
00:01:47,780 --> 00:01:47,790
out or are they going to profit from it
 

89
00:01:47,790 --> 00:01:51,319
out or are they going to profit from it
my guess my guess is the latter Tim

90
00:01:51,319 --> 00:01:51,329
my guess my guess is the latter Tim
 

91
00:01:51,329 --> 00:01:52,969
my guess my guess is the latter Tim
Hortons chief corporate officer Duncan

92
00:01:52,969 --> 00:01:52,979
Hortons chief corporate officer Duncan
 

93
00:01:52,979 --> 00:01:53,719
Hortons chief corporate officer Duncan
full syns

94
00:01:53,719 --> 00:01:53,729
full syns
 

95
00:01:53,729 --> 00:01:55,850
full syns
Fulton said in an e-mailed statement the

96
00:01:55,850 --> 00:01:55,860
Fulton said in an e-mailed statement the
 

97
00:01:55,860 --> 00:01:57,770
Fulton said in an e-mailed statement the
company did not have any comment on the

98
00:01:57,770 --> 00:01:57,780
company did not have any comment on the
 

99
00:01:57,780 --> 00:02:00,440
company did not have any comment on the
class-action lawsuit and reiterated that

100
00:02:00,440 --> 00:02:00,450
class-action lawsuit and reiterated that
 

101
00:02:00,450 --> 00:02:02,120
class-action lawsuit and reiterated that
it had discontinued background

102
00:02:02,120 --> 00:02:02,130
it had discontinued background
 

103
00:02:02,130 --> 00:02:03,139
it had discontinued background
location-tracking

104
00:02:03,139 --> 00:02:03,149
location-tracking
 

105
00:02:03,149 --> 00:02:05,179
location-tracking
although the app may still record user

106
00:02:05,179 --> 00:02:05,189
although the app may still record user
 

107
00:02:05,189 --> 00:02:09,229
although the app may still record user
location when it's open in many cases of

108
00:02:09,229 --> 00:02:09,239
location when it's open in many cases of
 

109
00:02:09,239 --> 00:02:11,390
location when it's open in many cases of
privacy violations is difficult to sue

110
00:02:11,390 --> 00:02:11,400
privacy violations is difficult to sue
 

111
00:02:11,400 --> 00:02:12,979
privacy violations is difficult to sue
because litigants can't put a dollar

112
00:02:12,979 --> 00:02:12,989
because litigants can't put a dollar
 

113
00:02:12,989 --> 00:02:13,940
because litigants can't put a dollar
value

114
00:02:13,940 --> 00:02:13,950
value
 

115
00:02:13,950 --> 00:02:16,250
value
on the harm they have suffered but the

116
00:02:16,250 --> 00:02:16,260
on the harm they have suffered but the
 

117
00:02:16,260 --> 00:02:17,660
on the harm they have suffered but the
Quebec Charter of Rights and Freedoms

118
00:02:17,660 --> 00:02:17,670
Quebec Charter of Rights and Freedoms
 

119
00:02:17,670 --> 00:02:20,540
Quebec Charter of Rights and Freedoms
makes privacy a protected rate and that

120
00:02:20,540 --> 00:02:20,550
makes privacy a protected rate and that
 

121
00:02:20,550 --> 00:02:23,509
makes privacy a protected rate and that
simplifies the case most privacy and

122
00:02:23,509 --> 00:02:23,519
simplifies the case most privacy and
 

123
00:02:23,519 --> 00:02:25,550
simplifies the case most privacy and
data cases in Canada have been focused

124
00:02:25,550 --> 00:02:25,560
data cases in Canada have been focused
 

125
00:02:25,560 --> 00:02:27,140
data cases in Canada have been focused
on breaches where companies allowed

126
00:02:27,140 --> 00:02:27,150
on breaches where companies allowed
 

127
00:02:27,150 --> 00:02:28,790
on breaches where companies allowed
private information to be leaked or

128
00:02:28,790 --> 00:02:28,800
private information to be leaked or
 

129
00:02:28,800 --> 00:02:32,030
private information to be leaked or
stolen by hackers but litigation around

130
00:02:32,030 --> 00:02:32,040
stolen by hackers but litigation around
 

131
00:02:32,040 --> 00:02:33,830
stolen by hackers but litigation around
issues relating to data and privacy

132
00:02:33,830 --> 00:02:33,840
issues relating to data and privacy
 

133
00:02:33,840 --> 00:02:36,559
issues relating to data and privacy
could become more common depending on

134
00:02:36,559 --> 00:02:36,569
could become more common depending on
 

135
00:02:36,569 --> 00:02:38,509
could become more common depending on
how the courts respond in this case and

136
00:02:38,509 --> 00:02:38,519
how the courts respond in this case and
 

137
00:02:38,519 --> 00:02:41,360
how the courts respond in this case and
future cases