{
  "@context": {
    "CIP100": "https://github.com/cardano-foundation/CIPs/blob/master/CIP-0100/README.md#",
    "hashAlgorithm": "CIP100:hashAlgorithm",
    "body": {
      "@id": "CIP100:body",
      "@context": {
        "references": {
          "@id": "CIP100:references",
          "@container": "@set",
          "@context": {
            "GovernanceMetadata": "CIP100:GovernanceMetadataReference",
            "Other": "CIP100:OtherReference",
            "label": "CIP100:reference-label",
            "uri": "CIP100:reference-uri",
            "referenceHash": {
              "@id": "CIP100:referenceHash",
              "@context": {
                "hashDigest": "CIP100:hashDigest",
                "hashAlgorithm": "CIP100:hashAlgorithm"
              }
            }
          }
        },
        "comment": "CIP100:comment",
        "externalUpdates": {
          "@id": "CIP100:externalUpdates",
          "@context": {
            "title": "CIP100:update-title",
            "uri": "CIP100:uri"
          }
        }
      }
    },
    "authors": {
      "@id": "CIP100:authors",
      "@container": "@set",
      "@context": {
        "name": "http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/name",
        "witness": {
          "@id": "CIP100:witness",
          "@context": {
            "witnessAlgorithm": "CIP100:witnessAlgorithm",
            "publicKey": "CIP100:publicKey",
            "signature": "CIP100:signature"
          }
        }
      }
    }
  },
  "authors": [],
  "body": {
    "comment": "I am a big fan of both Hydra and Midgard as L2 solutions for scaling Cardano.  That being said there are a few details missing from this proposal that make it hard for me to justify treasury spending as-is.  Primarily I think a recurring challenge the Cardano ecosystem has faced is building technical solutions that end up seeing little to no actual use.  I greatly appreciate that this proposal explains many of the use cases that both Hydra and Midgard aim to solve, and especially the specific mention of DeltaDefi and Masumi.  However, as it currently stands there is a massive surplus of unused capacity on the Cardano L1 and I fear that there is simply no activity that would \"flow over\" into either Midgard or Hydra.  In the case of Midgard specifically I'd like to see mentions of dApp builders wanting to build on-top of it.  In the case of Hydra I am curious to know if other advances in Hydra tech such as Gummiworm and Hydrozoa are also being collaborated on through this proposal.  Ultimately, I am concerned that the turnaround for the Cardano ecosystem to see any benefits from this may be too far out on the horizon, but am willing to vote YES if some minor improvements are made to it.  For that reason I will be voting ABSTAIN."
  },
  "hashAlgorithm": "blake2b-256"
}