{
  "@context": {
    "CIP100": "https://github.com/cardano-foundation/CIPs/blob/master/CIP-0100/README.md#",
    "hashAlgorithm": "CIP100:hashAlgorithm",
    "body": {
      "@id": "CIP100:body",
      "@context": {
        "references": {
          "@id": "CIP100:references",
          "@container": "@set",
          "@context": {
            "GovernanceMetadata": "CIP100:GovernanceMetadataReference",
            "Other": "CIP100:OtherReference",
            "label": "CIP100:reference-label",
            "uri": "CIP100:reference-uri",
            "referenceHash": {
              "@id": "CIP100:referenceHash",
              "@context": {
                "hashDigest": "CIP100:hashDigest",
                "hashAlgorithm": "CIP100:hashAlgorithm"
              }
            }
          }
        },
        "comment": "CIP100:comment",
        "externalUpdates": {
          "@id": "CIP100:externalUpdates",
          "@context": {
            "title": "CIP100:update-title",
            "uri": "CIP100:uri"
          }
        }
      }
    },
    "authors": {
      "@id": "CIP100:authors",
      "@container": "@set",
      "@context": {
        "name": "http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/name",
        "witness": {
          "@id": "CIP100:witness",
          "@context": {
            "witnessAlgorithm": "CIP100:witnessAlgorithm",
            "publicKey": "CIP100:publicKey",
            "signature": "CIP100:signature"
          }
        }
      }
    }
  },
  "authors": [],
  "body": {
    "comment": "As much as I agree with the intent of this proposal, I think the deliverables mentioned are not necessarily the best approach.  DevEx is definitely lacking, but I think the best way to improve that is to invest heavily in alternate nodes that condense the tool stack and often come with their own RPC, API, or Indexer built-in.  Additionally as far as smart contracts are concerned, I think the Cardano ecosystem greatly struggles from a lack of composability.  Most of our existing dApps and protocols were designed in isolation from each other and thus don't interoperate well or share liquidity.  Furthermore, there are several other proposals in this category aiming to solve the tooling/DevEx gap such as the Intersect Paid Open Source Model, the dOSPO and OMF program, and the Cardano Tooling DAO.  I think the best path forward here is for these groups to combine forces and put together a joint proposal that will solve Cardano's DevEx woes.  For that reason I'm voting NO on this proposal as it currently stands."
  },
  "hashAlgorithm": "blake2b-256"
}