{
"metadata": {
"name": "",
"signature": "sha256:b50bdb31a82455434a6499e5d9516f9ea4c8bf66542c1c8fb3fc90910b2e473b"
},
"nbformat": 3,
"nbformat_minor": 0,
"worksheets": [
{
"cells": [
{
"cell_type": "heading",
"level": 1,
"metadata": {},
"source": [
"Peer Evaluation Form"
]
},
{
"cell_type": "markdown",
"metadata": {},
"source": [
"This rubric will be used by the students to assess the project demos during the final exam period."
]
},
{
"cell_type": "markdown",
"metadata": {},
"source": [
"---"
]
},
{
"cell_type": "markdown",
"metadata": {},
"source": [
"
Category/Score | \n",
" 4 - Exemplary | \n",
" 3 - Accomplished | \n",
" 2 - Fair | \n",
" 1 - Poor |
\n",
"Organization | \n",
" The demo is well organized and has a clear logical progression from beginning to end. \n",
"Clearly states the research question to be answered. | \n",
" Demo is reasonably well organized, but has occasional jumps that are hard to follow. \n",
"Research question is stated. | \n",
" Organization is weak. The demo is rather hard to follow. Research question is not stated clearly. | \n",
" The demo is very disorganized and hard to follow. \n",
"Research question not stated at all. |
\n",
"Media | \n",
" Graphics or output are all clear, well designed, appropriate, and support the demo. \n",
"Plot labels are legible, understandable. | \n",
" Graphics or output are OK but some could be better designed. | \n",
" Graphics or output need work. May be lacking some appropriate materials to clearly elucidate results (e.g. missing animation or plot where needed). | \n",
" Graphics or output are poor. Hard to read, poorly designed. Important graphical results are missing. |
\n",
"Delivery | \n",
" Looks professional. Is relaxed, confident and enthusiastic. Speaks clearly at all times, with good volume, good pace, and smooth delivery. | \n",
" Enthusiasm doesn\u2019t come through. Volume and/or pace have occasional problems. Too many pauses and \u201cumms.\u201d | \n",
" Isn\u2019t confident or relaxed. Understandable, but serious difficulties with volume, pace, and/or pauses. | \n",
" Attitude is problematic. Hard to understand. Mumbles or speaks much too softly. |
\n",
"Content | \n",
" Speaker shows mastery of the topic. Project details and analysis are very clear. Research question is answered completely and appears correct. | \n",
" Speaker shows a decent understanding of the topic. Project details and analysis could have been clearer. Research question mostly answered. | \n",
" Understanding is weak; there are errors in the demo and/or significant pieces of the analysis were missing. | \n",
" Does not seem to understand the project much at all. Many errors. No serious attempt to answer research question. |
\n",
"
"
]
},
{
"cell_type": "markdown",
"metadata": {},
"source": [
"---\n",
"\n",
"Please assign a numerical score from 1 to 4 for each element of the student's presentation. Include your name on the form and be sure to evaluate yourself.\n",
"\n",
"