{ "@context": { "CIP100": "https://github.com/cardano-foundation/CIPs/blob/master/CIP-0100/README.md#", "hashAlgorithm": "CIP100:hashAlgorithm", "body": { "@id": "CIP100:body", "@context": { "references": { "@id": "CIP100:references", "@container": "@set", "@context": { "GovernanceMetadata": "CIP100:GovernanceMetadataReference", "Other": "CIP100:OtherReference", "label": "CIP100:reference-label", "uri": "CIP100:reference-uri", "referenceHash": { "@id": "CIP100:referenceHash", "@context": { "hashDigest": "CIP100:hashDigest", "hashAlgorithm": "CIP100:hashAlgorithm" } } } }, "comment": "CIP100:comment", "externalUpdates": { "@id": "CIP100:externalUpdates", "@context": { "title": "CIP100:update-title", "uri": "CIP100:uri" } } } }, "authors": { "@id": "CIP100:authors", "@container": "@set", "@context": { "name": "http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/name", "witness": { "@id": "CIP100:witness", "@context": { "witnessAlgorithm": "CIP100:witnessAlgorithm", "publicKey": "CIP100:publicKey", "signature": "CIP100:signature" } } } } }, "authors": [], "body": { "comment": "Vote: YES\n\nThis is a Treasury Withdrawal, \"Withdraw 11,787,063 ada for the OpenZeppelin Stack administered by Intersect\" (gov_action1gxxltxr02p28a398p8c6t08xhpg82wkkv9xgwvuxkly48lhgf20sqlkl2l8), submitted September 8, 2026 with voting closing October 11, 2026. OpenZeppelin requests ₳11,787,063 (approximately $1.83M at the $0.16/ADA reference rate, including a 3% Intersect administration fee of ₳343,313) to deliver, over 12 months in quarterly milestones, an audited smart contract library tailored to Cardano's eUTXO and Plutus environment, three production-grade reference implementations (liquid staking, self-repaying loans, and a tokenized money market fund), Contracts Wizard and AI-assisted development tooling, and 22 researcher-weeks of security capacity, with developer enablement and co-marketing included at no additional cost. No ADA burning is involved.\n\nWhat is being bought here is foundational. OpenZeppelin's contracts library is the de facto standard of the EVM world — imported by protocols holding over $110B in TVL and roughly 85% of the top 50 DeFi protocols — and the absence of an equivalent standardized, audited library is a genuine structural gap for Cardano: every team currently re-implements and re-audits primitives like access control, vaults, and timelocks from scratch. The accountability structure matches the strongest this DREP has approved in the 2026 cycle. Funds sit in Intersect's Treasury Reserve and Project-Specific Smart Contracts; every disbursement requires multiple Intersect admins, leadership sign-off, and co-signature from trusted entities drawn from a six-member independent oversight committee (Sundae Labs, Cardano Foundation, Dquadrant, NMKR, Sundial, Eternl); each milestone payment requires a Milestone Acceptance Form with public evidence verified by Intersect Delivery Assurance; funds are tracked on a public dashboard; and unspent funds sweep back to the treasury automatically at contract expiry. The milestones are concrete and quarterly, with the library foundations delivered first. This is also OpenZeppelin's first Cardano treasury request, and the proposal commits to returning with a refined submission rather than abandoning the ecosystem if it fails.\n\nThe concerns are real and Dracula DAO names them plainly. Twenty percent of the delivery budget — roughly ₳2.29M — is released at contract signing, before any work is delivered; payment should follow delivery, not precede it. The budget is split into five flat 20% tranches with no itemized cost per deliverable, so DReps cannot evaluate whether a reference implementation is priced at $100K or $500K. The entire delivery portion is converted to stablecoin at signature, which crystallizes the treasury's weakest price near multi-year lows. And this withdrawal lands with the current Net Change Limit roughly 91% consumed, spending scarce headroom. Dracula DAO's published position is that treasury funds should be grants paid on completion of well-defined features, competitively bid — this is a single pre-selected team on a milestone-gated contract, a partial approximation of that model, not the model itself.\n\nDracula DAO votes YES. The gap between this structure and the grants-on-completion ideal is the same gap Dracula DAO accepted on Scalus and Bifrost, and it is narrower than anything else on the ballot: money moves only against independently verified milestones, undelivered funds return to the treasury by contract, and the deliverable is the kind of audited, reusable, security-first infrastructure that compounds for a decade — precisely the ultra long-term posture this DREP exists to defend. If any team warrants a sole-source engagement for a standardized contracts library, it is the one whose library secures the majority of DeFi on other chains; the credible alternative is not a cheaper bidder, it is the gap persisting. Dracula DAO will judge any follow-on request entirely on delivery: if quarterly milestones slip or acceptance evidence is weak, continuation will be opposed, and the 20% unearned kick-off payment should not reappear in future Intersect-administered proposals." }, "hashAlgorithm": "blake2b-256" }