{ "@context": { "CIP100": "https://github.com/cardano-foundation/CIPs/blob/master/CIP-0100/README.md#", "hashAlgorithm": "CIP100:hashAlgorithm", "body": { "@id": "CIP100:body", "@context": { "references": { "@id": "CIP100:references", "@container": "@set", "@context": { "GovernanceMetadata": "CIP100:GovernanceMetadataReference", "Other": "CIP100:OtherReference", "label": "CIP100:reference-label", "uri": "CIP100:reference-uri", "referenceHash": { "@id": "CIP100:referenceHash", "@context": { "hashDigest": "CIP100:hashDigest", "hashAlgorithm": "CIP100:hashAlgorithm" } } } }, "comment": "CIP100:comment", "externalUpdates": { "@id": "CIP100:externalUpdates", "@context": { "title": "CIP100:update-title", "uri": "CIP100:uri" } } } }, "authors": { "@id": "CIP100:authors", "@container": "@set", "@context": { "name": "http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/name", "witness": { "@id": "CIP100:witness", "@context": { "witnessAlgorithm": "CIP100:witnessAlgorithm", "publicKey": "CIP100:publicKey", "signature": "CIP100:signature" } } } } }, "authors": [], "body": { "comment": "Vote: NO\n\nCritical Integrations V2 requests approximately 23 million ADA to fund Year 2 of an integrations program that delivered a published V1 closure report. Native L1 Fireblocks integration and ongoing maintenance of prior integrations are credible institutional-grade infrastructure work. On project merit, the program is the kind of long-horizon infrastructure investment Vampyre Fund generally supports.\n\nVampyre Fund votes NO on grounds of treasury timing.\n\n23 million ADA is a significant withdrawal in absolute terms, and at present ADA prices it represents real terms value destruction relative to executing the same scope after market recovery. Approving multi-million-ADA treasury draws during cyclical price lows monetizes the treasury at its weakest point and undermines the long-term capital base the ecosystem will need for far larger commitments in subsequent cycles.\n\nSeparately, we continue to hold that treasury funds should not function as multi-year team operating budgets. Year 2 renewals of this size, even with a delivered V1, reinforce a continuous-disbursement model rather than a competitive, milestone-bid model in which work units are funded as completed. We would prefer to see V2 broken into smaller tranches with independent renewal votes tied to specific delivered integrations.\n\nWe encourage resubmission, either at a smaller scope or after market conditions improve, and we will reassess on its own merits at that time." }, "hashAlgorithm": "blake2b-256" }