{
  "@context": {
    "CIP100": "https://github.com/cardano-foundation/CIPs/blob/master/CIP-0100/README.md#",
    "hashAlgorithm": "CIP100:hashAlgorithm",
    "body": {
      "@id": "CIP100:body",
      "@context": {
        "references": {
          "@id": "CIP100:references",
          "@container": "@set",
          "@context": {
            "GovernanceMetadata": "CIP100:GovernanceMetadataReference",
            "Other": "CIP100:OtherReference",
            "label": "CIP100:reference-label",
            "uri": "CIP100:reference-uri",
            "referenceHash": {
              "@id": "CIP100:referenceHash",
              "@context": {
                "hashDigest": "CIP100:hashDigest",
                "hashAlgorithm": "CIP100:hashAlgorithm"
              }
            }
          }
        },
        "comment": "CIP100:comment",
        "externalUpdates": {
          "@id": "CIP100:externalUpdates",
          "@context": {
            "title": "CIP100:update-title",
            "uri": "CIP100:uri"
          }
        }
      }
    },
    "authors": {
      "@id": "CIP100:authors",
      "@container": "@set",
      "@context": {
        "name": "http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/name",
        "witness": {
          "@id": "CIP100:witness",
          "@context": {
            "witnessAlgorithm": "CIP100:witnessAlgorithm",
            "publicKey": "CIP100:publicKey",
            "signature": "CIP100:signature"
          }
        }
      }
    }
  },
  "authors": [],
  "body": {
    "comment": "Vote: YES\n\nThis is a Treasury Withdrawal (gov_action1654yj97lf7guxsh27phtknq2tsc4dajp95fh7vrucaltjy0502csq7qtkhq), submitted June 9, 2026 with voting closing July 13, 2026, requesting 100,000 ADA to reimburse Ikigai Technologies for a governance-action deposit it can no longer recover. The deposit was trapped by a Cardano node bug that permitted an unregistered stake key to be used in a governance action, so the standard deposit-refund mechanism — which normally returns the 100,000 ADA on ratification or expiry — could not return the funds. The requested amount matches the standard deposit exactly, and the community has signalled since the Plomin hard fork that reimbursing this specific stranded deposit via a treasury withdrawal is the appropriate remedy.\n\nDracula DAO votes YES. This is not discretionary spending; it is remediation of a protocol failure. Cardano's governance deposit is designed to be fully refundable — that guarantee is what makes it a legitimate anti-spam bond rather than a fee. Ikigai, a long-standing Cardano builder, submitted a governance action in good faith, posted the required bond, and lost access to it solely because of a node-level defect, not through any error or bad faith of its own. When the protocol itself breaks a refund guarantee it made, making the affected party whole preserves the integrity of the deposit mechanism and the credibility of participating in governance at all. The amount is fixed and small — 100,000 ADA, roughly $26,000 at prevailing prices — the recipient and cause are clearly identified, and there is no ADA burning and no open-ended commitment.\n\nThe honest concerns are precedent and scope. A treasury reimbursement of a governance deposit must be understood as bounded strictly to funds stranded by a documented protocol bug — not as a general policy of socializing normally-refundable deposits, which would gut the deposit's anti-spam function by removing the submitter's skin in the game. This action reads as the narrow, one-time correction, but the DREP will oppose any future attempt to generalize it into routine deposit reimbursement absent a genuine protocol failure. It is also worth stating plainly that the cleaner long-term fix is at the ledger level, so that stranded deposits are recoverable directly rather than requiring a treasury draw; a treasury withdrawal is the practical remedy available today, not the ideal one.\n\nDracula DAO's treasury philosophy centers on funding delivered work, not operating budgets, and this action sits outside that frame entirely — it is neither a grant nor a budget but a correction of a bond wrongly withheld by the system. Judged on fairness, low risk, and the health of the governance process, it clears the bar. Dracula DAO supports reimbursing Ikigai's trapped 100,000 ADA deposit and votes YES."
  },
  "hashAlgorithm": "blake2b-256"
}