hash algorithm: blake2b-256
body:
  summary: We have determined that this treasury withdrawal governance action is constitutional.
  rationale statement: The governance action with ID "gov_action1654yj97lf7guxsh27phtknq2tsc4dajp95fh7vrucaltjy0502csq7qtkhq" and title "Reimburse Ikigai Info Governance Action Deposit." is a Treasury Withdrawal, and is therefore subject to the following sections and guardrails in the Cardano Constitution. ARTICLE II, Section 6 of the Cardano Constitution states that governance actions must follow a standardized and legible format, including a URL hosting an immutable document and a corresponding hash, and must provide sufficient rationale including a title, abstract, justification, and supporting materials. This governance action includes a valid URL and hash, which matches the hash of the off-chain documentation referenced. The rationale also meets the minimum content specified in this section. ARTICLE II, Section 7 specifies that Treasury Withdrawal governance actions must include the following: 1\. Purpose, Delivery Period, Costs, and Refund Conditions This governance action specifies: - The purpose of the withdrawal as "To reimburse the lost deposit for an Info governance action." - The period for delivery of proposed activities as "This will be instantly performed as part of the governance action’s enactment on-chain." - "There are no costs or expenses associated with this treasury withdrawal." - "There are no circumstances for refunding to the treasury." These elements fulfil the requirements of Article II, Section 7(1). 2\. Prior Treasury Funding Disclosure ARTICLE II, Section 7(2) requires disclosure of whether the prospective recipient has received ada from the Cardano Treasury within the last 24 months. This governance action states that "The recipient of this reimbursement has not previously received funds from the treasury.". This fulfils the requirement of ARTICLE II, Section 7(2). 3\. Net Change Limit (NCL) ARTICLE II, Section 7(3) requires that Treasury Withdrawals must not exceed the Net Change Limit. The Net Change Limit in effect at the time of submission of this vote o…
  precedent discussion: None
  counterargument discussion: None
  conclusion: This governance action sufficiently fulfils the criteria specified for treasury withdrawals in the Cardano Constitution, so is deemed constitutional.
  internal vote:
    constitutional: 4
    unconstitutional: 0
    abstain: 2
    did not vote: 1
authors:
  name: Eastern Cardano Council
  witness:
    witness algorithm: ed25519