\documentclass[english]{article}
\usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}
\usepackage{babel}
\usepackage{color}
%\usepackage{amsmath}
\usepackage{graphicx}
\usepackage{fancyhdr}
\usepackage{longtable}
%\usepackage{makecell}  % $ sudo tlmgr install makecell
%\pagestyle{fancy}
%\fancyhf{}
\renewcommand{\headrulewidth}{0pt}
\setlength{\headheight}{20pt} 

\begin{document}

\title{FAIR Metric FM-F1B}

\author{Mark D. Wilkinson, Susanna-Assunta Sansone, \\Erik Schultes, Peter Doorn,\\ 
Luiz Olavo Bonino da Silva Santos, Michel Dumontier}

\maketitle
%\thispagestyle{fancy}


%\begin{table}
\centering

\begin{tabular}{|p{5cm}|p{9cm}|}
\hline
\emph{FIELD} & \emph{DESCRIPTION} \\
\hline
Metric Identifier &   FM-F1B: \verb"https://purl.org/fair-metrics/FM_F1B"
 \\


\hline
Metric Name &   
Identifier persistence
 \\



\hline
To which principle does it apply? &   F1\\



\hline
What is being measured? & Whether there is a policy that describes what the provider will do in the event an identifier scheme becomes deprecated.\\



\hline
Why should we measure it? & 

The change to an identifier scheme will have widespread implications for resource lookup, linking, and data sharing. Providers of digital resources must ensure that they have a policy to manage changes in their identifier scheme, with a specific emphasis on maintaining/redirecting previously generated identifiers.
  
\\



\hline
What must be provided? &  
A URL that resolves to a document containing the relevant policy.
 \\



\hline
How do we measure it? &  
Use an HTTP GET on URL provided. \newline
\\



\hline
What is a valid result? &  
Present (a 200,202,203 or 206 HTTP response after resolving all and any prior redirects. e.g. 301 -> 302 -> 200 OK) or Absent (any other HTTP code)
\\



\hline
For which digital resource(s) is this relevant? &  All\\



\hline
Examples of their application across types of digital resource &  
for each of the ‘canonical’ data types, examples, if available.
\newline @todo
\newline
\newline
FAIR principles (scholarly publication in Nature Scientific Data)\newline
\verb|https://www.doi.org/overview/DOI_article_ELIS3.pdf|
\newline
http://www.nature.com/developers/\newline
documentation/metadata-resources/doi/ \newline
\newline
FAIR Principles (computable representation): 
\newline
https://github.com/FAIRDataInitiative/\newline
\verb|FAIR-principles#fair-principles|
\newline
For DSA-certified repositories (example below of 3TU-Datacentre at Delft) the identifier persistence policy is described in the self assessment:\newline
https://assessment.datasealofapproval.org/\newline
\verb|assessment_187/seal/pdf/| \newline
\newline
DOI Handbook - ensuring persistence:\newline 
\verb|http://www.doi.org/doi_handbook/| \newline
\verb|6_Policies.html#6.5}|
\\



\hline

Comments & 

A first version of this metric would focus on just checking a URL that resolves to a document. We can’t verify that document. \newline
A second version would indicate how to structure the data policy document with a particular section (similar to how the CC licenses now have a formal structure in RDF).\newline
A third version would insist that that document and section is signed by an approved organization and made available in an appropriate repository. \\ 
\hline
\end{tabular}
% \caption{The template for creating FAIR Metrics}
%\end{table}



\end{document}