METADATA last updated: 2026-01-25 file_name: KENT_pilot-data_summary.md file_date: 2021-07-29 title: KENT Pilot Data Summary category: pilots subcategory: pilot-data tags: source_file_type: csv xfile_type: xlsx gfile_url: NA xfile_github_download_url: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/FocusOnFoundationsNonprofit/floodlamp-archive/main/pilots/pilot-data/KENT_xlsx_downloads pdf_gdrive_url: NA pdf_github_url: NA license: CC BY 4.0 - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ words: 1929 tokens: 2748 notes: summary_short: Kent (KENT) was a youth camp testing program at Camp Kenmont in Kent, CT, where volunteers and camp staff operated FloodLAMP for pooled HCW-collected testing of young adult campers and staff, brought up remotely, and using the FloodLAMP mobile app. The 1-month summer program (2021-06-28 to 2021-07-29) tested 190 tubes from 696 participant results (avg pool size 3.7) with 2 positive tubes detected. CONTENT ## Plots ### Composite ![KENT Weekly Composite](_plots/KENT_weekly_composite.png) ### Percent Positive Tubes ![KENT Weekly Percent Positives](_plots/KENT_weekly_percent_positives.png) ### Volume ![KENT Weekly Volume](_plots/KENT_weekly_volume.png) ## Files ### Google Sheets URLs - [KENT_STS_PUB](https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1J1Gqc0KAQX_xxiSJ5MR8DVjGzFSfDR-ckCKRNDYmDNQ/edit?usp=drive_link) ### Curated CSVs - Curated CSV folder: `KENT_curated_csvs/` - Stats key-values CSV: [KENT_STS_stats_key-values.csv](KENT_curated_csvs/KENT_STS_stats_key-values.csv) - Weekly summary CSV: _not available_ - Referral tests by person CSV: _not available_ ### XLSX downloads: - [KENT_STS_PUB.xlsx](KENT_xlsx_downloads/KENT_STS_PUB.xlsx) ## Key tables ### Stats key-values | section | metric | value | value_status | details | comments | source_sheet | source_row | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Files | RFR or APS Files | NONE | ok | | | Stats | 1 | | Files | RTR File | NONE | ok | | | Stats | 2 | | Files | RSR File | NONE | ok | | | Stats | 3 | | Overall | Number of Tubes Tested (initial only - no re-runs) | 190 | ok | initial run tubes only so excludes re-runs | unless otherwise specified - all data from gsheet: Data Stats - Compilation PRE DP - Compilation tab (APS RAW data not available) | Stats | 5 | | Overall | Number of Tube Tests Run (includes re-runs) | 191 | ok | includes re-runs | | Stats | 6 | | Overall | Number of Initial Runs | 3 | ok | | 4 - 2 bunk and 2 plate runs (6-28, 6-30, and 7-29) | Stats | 7 | | Overall | Number of APS Only Tubes run | 190 | ok | | | Stats | 8 | | Overall | Number of Test Reactions (RFR plus APS only tubes run) | 193 | ok | includes technical replicates (the same tube sample in multiple reactions in the same run) | | Stats | 9 | | Overall | Number of Participant Results | 696 | ok | counts individual samples in pools and excludes re-runs | from Compilation data | Stats | 11 | | Overall | Number of ARF Tubes | 0 | ok | tubes run and present in RFR but not in Appivo - created tube IDs that start with ARF | | Stats | 12 | | Overall | Sum of Participant Results plus ARF Tubes | 696 | ok | Will be equal to the number of tubes tested if no pooling. | | Stats | 13 | | Overall | Average Pool Level (excludes ARF) | 3.7 | ok | | | Stats | 14 | | Re-runs | Number of Run Tubes (re-runs only) | 1 | ok | from RFR Audit Num Run Tubes | Assume one initial inconclusive tube was rerun and not included in 190 in Compilation because that was from Appivo data | Stats | 17 | | Re-runs | Number of Reactions (re-runs only) | 3 | ok | from RFR Audit Num rxns (excl ctrls) | Assume rerun was in triplicate | Stats | 18 | | Re-runs | Re-run % of Tubes | 0.5% | ok | re-run / initial | | Stats | 19 | | Re-runs | Number of Initial Runs with Re-runs | 1 | ok | | | Stats | 20 | | Re-runs | % Initial Runs with Re-runs | 33.3% | ok | | | Stats | 21 | | Positives | Number of Tubes with Final Result Positive | 2 | ok | | | Stats | 24 | | Positives | % of Tubes Positives (Final Result) | 1.1% | ok | | | Stats | 25 | | Positives | Number of Cases with Final Result Positive (Indiv or Pool) | 1 | ok | Subtract off Re-tests | | Stats | 26 | | Positives | Known Positive Cases | 1 | ok | Previous tested (including by FloodLAMP test) or reported positive | tested twice once on 6-28 in bunk run and other on 6-30 in plate full camp run | Stats | 27 | | Positives | Unknown Positive Cases | 0 | ok | | | Stats | 28 | | Inconclusives | Number of Tubes with Final Result Inconclusive | 0 | ok | | | Stats | 31 | | Inconclusives | Number of Tubes in RFR Audit Inconclusive not in Appivo Final Results | 0 | ok | | | Stats | 32 | | Inconclusives | Total Number of Inconclusive Tubes | 0 | ok | | | Stats | 33 | | Inconclusives | % of Tubes Inconclusive | 0.0% | ok | | | Stats | 34 | | Inconclusives | Number of Inconclusive Tubes resolved Positive by Referral Test or Correspondence | 0 | ok | | | Stats | 35 | | Inconclusives | % Inconclusives resolved Positive by Referral Tests | | denom_zero | | denom zero | Stats | 36 | | Inconclusives | Number of Inconclusive Tubes with Referral Test or Correspondence Negative | 0 | ok | | | Stats | 37 | | Inconclusives | Number of Inconclusive Tubes with no Referral Test result or Correspondence | 0 | ok | | | Stats | 38 | | Inconclusives | Number of Tubes with Initial Inconclusives and Re-run Negative | 1 | ok | Count Result Correction Code=2.5 in preDel col AJ, or from RFR preExcl if not resulted as Incl in App | | Stats | 39 | | Inconclusives | Number of Inconclusive Test Run Calls | 1 | ok | includes re-runs - from RFR Audit only and excludes any APS only resulted inconclusives | | Stats | 40 | | Inconclusives | % Tube Tests Run Called Inconclusive | 0.5% | ok | includes re-runs | | Stats | 41 | | Referrals and Correspondence | Number of FloodLAMP Cases with Referral Tests or Correspondence | 1 | ok | Indiv or Pool, Cases used instead of Person to account for people being contracting COVID multiple times, and instead of Results to exclude re-tests | | Stats | 44 | | Referrals and Correspondence | Number of Referral Confirmed FloodLAMP Positives | 1 | ok | Sometimes also termed Agree Positives - Include initial Inconclusive with Referral or Correspondence Positive | | Stats | 45 | | Referrals and Correspondence | FL Inconclusives with Referral / Correspondence Positive | 0 | ok | | | Stats | 46 | | Referrals and Correspondence | % FloodLAMP Positive or Inconclusive with Referral / Correspondence Positive | 100.0% | ok | | | Stats | 47 | | Referrals and Correspondence | FL Inconclusives but Referral / Correspondence Negative | 0 | ok | | | Stats | 48 | | Referrals and Correspondence | FL Inconclusives with No Referral Tests or Correspondence | 1 | ok | | | Stats | 49 | | Comparison to Antigen | Number of FloodLAMP Test Person Cases with Referral Antigen Tests (including non-Same Day) | 1 | ok | | | Stats | 52 | | Comparison to Antigen | Number of FloodLAMP Test Person Cases with Same Day Referral Antigen Tests | 1 | ok | | | Stats | 53 | | Comparison to Antigen | Number of FloodLAMP Positive Test Person Cases with Same Day Antigen Negative | 1 | ok | Agree with Referral Test Positive (usually PCR or later Antigen) but Initial Antigen Negative | | Stats | 54 | | Comparison to Antigen | % Confirmed FloodLAMP Positives with Same Day Antigen Negative | 100.0% | ok | | | Stats | 55 | | Comparison to Antigen | Number of FloodLAMP Positive Test Person Cases confirmed with Referral Tests but Antigen and Other Non-Antigen Test Negative | 0 | ok | | | Stats | 56 | | Comparison to Antigen | % Confirmed FloodLAMP Positives that were Antigen and Other Non-Antigen Test Negative | 0.0% | ok | | | Stats | 57 | | False Calls | False Positives Final Results | 0 | ok | From reviewing APS/Pos and Incl tab Unconfirmed FL Positives | | Stats | 60 | | False Calls | False Negative Final Results (Suspected) | 0 | ok | From reviewing Referral Tests by Person and correspondence with Program Admin | | Stats | 61 | | People | Number of Unique Individuals Tested | 342 | ok | Includes UnknownPerson additions but not ARF tubes | Equal to number of participants in 89 tubes in KENT_2021-06-30_App data import 6-30 8:30am | Stats | 64 | | People | Number of Unique Sponsors | 10 | ok | People who collect using the app | | Stats | 65 | | Positivity | Number of Unique Individual Tested FloodLAMP Positive | 1 | ok | includes Inconclusive FloodLAMP result confirmed Positive by follow-up or Referral | | Stats | 68 | | Positivity | % of Population FloodLAMP Positive (excluding pools not deconv) | 0.3% | ok | | | Stats | 69 | | Positivity | Number of Unique Individual Tested FloodLAMP Positive (including if in a positive pool) | 1 | ok | | | Stats | 70 | | Positivity | % of Population FloodLAMP Positive (including everyone in a positive pool) | 0.3% | ok | | | Stats | 71 | | Dates | Start Run Date | 2021-06-28 | ok | | | Stats | 74 | | Dates | End Run Date | 2021-07-29 | ok | | | Stats | 75 | | Info | Test Operator | Volunteers, Camp Staff | ok | Who ran the actual testing (running LAMP reactions) | | Stats | 78 | | Info | Test Processing Site | On Site Room | ok | Where the test processing (running LAMP reactions) was done | | Stats | 79 | | Info | Population Tested | Young Adult Campers, Staff | ok | Description of the participants | | Stats | 80 | | Info | Configuration | Standard | ok | Equipment set used for test processing (relates to throughput and type of test tube used) | | Stats | 81 | | Info | Collection Type | Pooled | ok | Pooled, Individual, or Both | | Stats | 82 | | Info | Self or HCW Collected | HCW | ok | HCW is Health Care Worker | | Stats | 83 | | Info | App Used? | Yes | ok | Was the FloodLAMP Mobile App and Admin Portal utilized in the program | | Stats | 84 | | Info | Bring-up Type | Remote (NSVD) | ok | How the initial setup and validation of the testing site was done | | Stats | 85 | | Info | Program Name | Kent | ok | Shorthand name used internally at FloodLAMP and in other documents for this program | | Stats | 86 | | Info | Site | Camp Kenmont | ok | Broader physical space where the testing was done and/or where participants congregated | | Stats | 87 | | Info | Site Type | Youth Camp | ok | Type of entity or organization receiving the testing program | | Stats | 88 | | Info | Location | Kent, CT | ok | Geographical location of where the FloodLAMP testing program occurred | | Stats | 89 | ### Weekly summary _Weekly summary CSV not found for this site._