{ "slug": "monero-51-attack-qubic", "type": "article", "title": "Monero Blockchain 51% Attack: Qubic’s Impact & Risks", "pageUrl": "https://etz-swap.com/blog/monero-51-attack-qubic", "cover": "https://api.etz-swap.com/api/v1/content?path=blog/monero-51-attack-qubic-cover.webp", "publisher": { "name": "ETZ Swap", "url": "https://etz-swap.com", "logo": "https://api.etz-swap.com/api/v1/content?path=blog/logo.webp" }, "friendlyUrls": [ { "url": "https://etz-swap.com", "anchor": "ETZ Swap (homepage)" }, { "url": "https://etz-swap.com/ru/exchange-pair/btc-btc-xmr-xmr-0.125", "anchor": "BTC → XMR exchange pair" }, { "url": "https://etz-swap.com/ru/exchange-pair/usdt-eth-sol-sol-100", "anchor": "USDT (ETH) → SOL exchange pair" }, { "url": "https://etz-swap.com/ru/exchange-pair/eth-eth-xmr-xmr-0.125", "anchor": "ETH → XMR exchange pair" }, { "url": "https://etz-swap.com/ru/exchange-pair/btc-btc-eth-eth-0.125", "anchor": "BTC → ETH exchange pair" }, { "url": "https://etz-swap.com/ru/exchange-pair/usdt-eth-xmr-xmr-100", "anchor": "USDT (ETH) → XMR exchange pair" }, { "url": "https://etz-swap.com/ru/exchange-pair/xmr-xmr-eth-eth-1", "anchor": "XMR → ETH exchange pair" }, { "url": "https://etz-swap.com/ru/exchange-pair/trx-trx-xmr-xmr-300", "anchor": "TRX → XMR exchange pair" }, { "url": "https://etz-swap.com/ru/coins/xmr", "anchor": "Monero (XMR) page" }, { "url": "https://etz-swap.com/ru/coins/eth", "anchor": "Ethereum (ETH) page" }, { "url": "https://etz-swap.com/ru/coins/btc", "anchor": "Bitcoin (BTC) page" }, { "url": "https://etz-swap.com/ru/coins/usdt", "anchor": "Tether (USDT) page" }, { "url": "https://etz-swap.com/ru/coins/usdc", "anchor": "USD Coin (USDC) page" }, { "url": "https://etz-swap.com/ru/coins/xrp", "anchor": "XRP page" } ], "keyQuestions": [ "What is a 51% attack and what can it realistically do to a PoW chain?", "What happened during the Qubic-related Monero reorganizations?", "How did exchanges and the Monero community respond in practice?", "Why can hashrate economics be a bigger risk than protocol bugs?", "Which mitigations are discussed (decentralization, checkpoints, merge mining) and what trade-offs do they bring?" ], "quickSteps": [ "Treat large confirmations seriously during suspected reorg periods; do not rush deposits.", "Follow exchange notices and official community channels for confirmation guidance.", "Avoid large, time-sensitive transfers until the chain is stable again.", "Keep TXIDs and timestamps; document everything if you need support.", "Prefer non-custodial workflows and minimize time funds sit on custodial venues." ], "issueRouting": { "start": "If you’re moving XMR during or after a reorg event, start by deciding whether you can delay the transfer; if not, increase safety margins and documentation.", "branches": [ { "if": "You can wait for stability", "then": [ "Pause large transfers until reorg chatter and exchange warnings subside.", "Monitor confirmations and network status from multiple sources.", "Resume with a small test transfer before moving full size." ] }, { "if": "You must transfer now (time-sensitive)", "then": [ "Use higher confirmation thresholds and conservative amounts.", "Avoid routing through venues that currently pause deposits/withdrawals.", "Keep a clear paper trail (TXIDs, screenshots, timestamps) for any dispute." ] } ] }, "riskNotes": [ "Reorg/double-spend risk rises when a single entity can influence block production.", "Exchange policy risk: platforms may pause deposits or raise confirmation requirements without notice.", "Market risk: headline-driven volatility can spike during security incidents.", "Operational risk: confusion about confirmations and chain state can cause mistakes under stress." ] }