RMUX benchmark overview

Linux
Linux

70b68ca083f6 ยท p50 latency, lower is faster. Full Raw Benchmarks

Scenariormuxtmuxzellijvs tmux
Create background session (default shell)3.565 ms7.565 ms-๐ŸŸข 2.1x faster
List sessions1.744 ms3.374 ms16.358 ms๐ŸŸข 1.9x faster
Split pane left/right3.456 ms3.386 ms63.832 msโ‰ˆ same speed
Split pane top/bottom3.418 ms3.399 ms63.769 msโ‰ˆ same speed
Send keys to pane/window1.332 ms3.422 ms31.715 ms๐ŸŸข 2.6x faster
Capture visible output1.305 ms3.476 ms16.806 ms๐ŸŸข 2.7x faster
Capture full scrollback3.470 ms3.514 ms-โ‰ˆ same speed
List tabs/windows3.646 ms3.939 ms15.966 msโ‰ˆ same speed
Grow pane by 1 cell1.715 ms3.461 ms-๐ŸŸข 2.0x faster
Terminate session2.060 ms3.392 ms16.264 ms๐ŸŸข 1.6x faster

Windows
Windows

70b68ca083f6 ยท p50 latency, lower is faster. Full Raw Benchmarks

Scenariormuxtmux (WSL)zellijvs tmux (WSL)
Create background session (default shell)25.381 ms86.820 ms-๐ŸŸข 3.4x faster
List sessions22.345 ms92.790 ms128.624 ms๐ŸŸข 4.2x faster
Split pane left/right32.816 ms89.223 ms95.949 ms๐ŸŸข 2.7x faster
Split pane top/bottom32.704 ms90.214 ms95.584 ms๐ŸŸข 2.8x faster
Send keys to pane/window20.829 ms87.857 ms83.411 ms๐ŸŸข 4.2x faster
Capture visible output21.019 ms86.296 ms82.153 ms๐ŸŸข 4.1x faster
Capture full scrollback21.259 ms89.079 ms-๐ŸŸข 4.2x faster
List tabs/windows19.537 ms85.845 ms78.786 ms๐ŸŸข 4.4x faster
Grow pane by 1 cell21.172 ms85.812 ms-๐ŸŸข 4.1x faster
Terminate session20.941 ms88.374 ms92.412 ms๐ŸŸข 4.2x faster

macOS
macOS

70b68ca083f6 ยท p50 latency, lower is faster. Full Raw Benchmarks

macOS note: measured on a MacBook Pro. Most operations finish around 5 ms on this machine; read those rows as "same speed".

Scenariormuxtmuxzellijvs tmux
Create background session (default shell)4.890 ms9.526 ms-๐ŸŸข 1.9x faster
List sessions4.630 ms4.564 ms19.727 msโ‰ˆ same speed
Split pane left/right4.645 ms4.580 ms19.657 msโ‰ˆ same speed
Split pane top/bottom4.642 ms4.576 ms19.846 msโ‰ˆ same speed
Send keys to pane/window4.616 ms4.536 ms19.867 msโ‰ˆ same speed
Capture visible output4.617 ms4.545 ms19.497 msโ‰ˆ same speed
Capture full scrollback4.666 ms4.568 ms-โ‰ˆ same speed
List tabs/windows11.410 ms11.635 ms19.845 msโ‰ˆ same speed
Grow pane by 1 cell4.685 ms4.582 ms-โ‰ˆ same speed
Terminate session4.725 ms4.623 ms19.720 msโ‰ˆ same speed
## Reproducing Run the scripts locally on each OS, gather the JSON files, and generate the Markdown: ```bash scripts/bench/run-unix.sh --out target/benchmarks/linux.json scripts/bench/run-windows.ps1 -Out target/benchmarks/windows.json scripts/bench/run-unix.sh --out target/benchmarks/macos.json python3 scripts/bench/render.py target/benchmarks/*.json --output docs/benchmarks.md ``` Each OS measures itself locally, so no number here includes SSH or remote-shell latency. Note: Scripts run safely in isolated sessions and only kill their own test processes. ## Methodology The `render.py` script updates this Markdown file and linked CSVs based on the JSON results. Each JSON artifact records the commit, platform, tool versions and every p50/p95 sample behind a cell. `-`: Operation is unavailable or not comparable. Missing adapters and failed samples are omitted, never estimated. Zellij and GNU screen: results only show exact equivalents or close approximations. Tools reached through a compatibility layer are labelled as such, and the JSON records each measured tool's environment. On Windows the ratio compares RMUX against tmux under WSL, never against a native Windows multiplexer. `โ‰ˆ same speed` spans 0.80x to 1.25x, the spread repeated samples actually show on these hosts; a narrower claim would publish host noise as a result. Generated at `2026-07-16T22:27:58Z` from commit `70b68ca083f6`.