# Document and Record Control Procedure Working Template > **STATUS: DRAFT EXAMPLE — NOT APPROVED — NO COMPLIANCE CLAIM** > > This structure is not a released procedure. It does not determine retention, > regulatory applicability, conformity, or certification. Authorized management, > RA/QA, legal/regulatory, process owners, and document control must approve the > organization-specific controls. ISO publications are copyrighted; use an > authorized copy and do not paste their text here. ## Controlled-document metadata | Field | Entry | |---|---| | Document ID/revision | `` / `` | | Owner | `` | | Status | `draft` / `in-review` / `approved` | | Effective date | `` | | Evidence repository | `` | | Change/superseded record | `` | | Approval role | Named approver | Status | Date | Approval evidence | |---|---|---|---|---| | Process owner | `` | `pending` | `` | `` | | RA/QA | `` | `pending` | `` | `` | | System owner | `` | `pending` | `` | `` | ## 1. Purpose, scope, and interfaces - Controlled documents covered: `` - Records covered: `` - External sources covered: standards, regulations, guidance, customer and supplier specifications, and product-specific sources. - Interfaces: change control, training, validation, data integrity, cybersecurity, supplier controls, product files, complaints/CAPA, audit, and management review. ## 2. Roles and segregation of duties | Role | Authority/responsibility | Independence or access restriction | Delegate | Evidence | Approval | |---|---|---|---|---|---| | Document owner | `` | `` | `` | `` | `` | | Record owner | `` | `` | `` | `` | `` | | Reviewer | `` | `` | `` | `` | `` | | Approver | `` | `` | `` | `` | `` | | System administrator | `` | `` | `` | `` | `` | ## 3. Document lifecycle | Stage | Required controls | Owner | Status | Evidence | Approval | |---|---|---|---|---|---| | Request/authoring | need, scope, source/version, author | `` | `draft` | `` | `` | | Review | technical, process, RA/QA, linked-document impact | `` | `draft` | `` | `` | | Approval/release | named authority, date, revision, effective date | `` | `draft` | `` | `` | | Distribution/use | access, point-of-use revision, copy status | `` | `draft` | `` | `` | | Change | rationale, impact, validation/training, linked updates | `` | `draft` | `` | `` | | Obsolescence | withdrawal, archive, retained-copy identification | `` | `draft` | `` | `` | Define approved rules for identifiers, revision schemes, emergency changes, printed copies, translations, electronic signatures, and controlled exports. Do not assume that a downloaded or printed file remains controlled. ## 4. Record lifecycle and data integrity | Control | Organization-specific method | Owner | Status | Evidence | Approval | |---|---|---|---|---|---| | Creation/attribution | `` | `` | `draft` | `` | `` | | Legibility/completeness | `` | `` | `draft` | `` | `` | | Contemporaneous entry | `` | `` | `draft` | `` | `` | | Corrections/audit trail | `` | `` | `draft` | `` | `` | | Access/security | `` | `` | `draft` | `` | `` | | Backup/recovery | `` | `` | `draft` | `` | `` | | Retrieval | `` | `` | `draft` | `` | `` | | Retention/disposition | `` | `` | `draft` | `` | `` | Retention periods must cite an approved basis for each record type. This template does not supply a universal period. ## 5. External source and version control | Source ID | Publisher/title | Version/date | Authorized location | Applicability owner | Last currency review | Impact record | Status | Approval | |---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---| | `` | `` | `` | `` | `` | `` | `` | `review-due` | `` | Required controls: 1. Obtain standards from an authorized source and preserve license restrictions. 2. Record the exact edition/version incorporated into each jurisdictional basis. 3. Monitor official publishers; do not rely on search snippets as controlled text. 4. Perform and approve impact assessment before changing QMS documents. 5. Distinguish ISO, FDA QMSR/eCFR, MDSAP, EU MDR/IVDR/MDCG, and product-specific sources rather than treating them as interchangeable. ## 6. Electronic systems and software validation | System/use | Intended use | Risk basis | Access/audit-trail controls | Validation evidence | Change/revalidation trigger | Owner | Approval | |---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---| | `` | `` | `` | `` | `` | `` | `` | `` | Do not release an electronic workflow until authorized owners approve intended use, validation evidence, access roles, data migration, backup/recovery, and change controls. ## 7. Change and training impact Every change record should include: - reason, affected products/sites/processes/documents/records; - source/version and regulatory-impact review; - risk, validation, software, supplier, and postmarket impacts; - training population and completion evidence before effective use; - implementation verification, owner, status, evidence, and approval. ## 8. Registers and audit evidence | Register | Owner | Status | Location | Review frequency/basis | Evidence | Approval | |---|---|---|---|---|---|---| | Master document list | `` | `draft` | `` | `` | `` | `` | | Record retention schedule | `` | `draft` | `` | `` | `` | `` | | External source ledger | `` | `draft` | `` | `` | `` | `` | | Access/role register | `` | `draft` | `` | `` | `` | `` | | Training/change register | `` | `draft` | `` | `` | `` | `` | | Obsolete/disposition log | `` | `draft` | `` | `` | `` | `` | ## Release checklist - [ ] Scope includes documents, records, external sources, and electronic systems. - [ ] Owners, statuses, evidence, source versions, and approvals are explicit. - [ ] Access, integrity, retrieval, retention, disposition, and audit trails are defined. - [ ] Change, validation, software, supplier, and training impacts are linked. - [ ] No universal retention period or automatic applicability conclusion is asserted. - [ ] No template or script result is described as compliance or certification. - [ ] Required human approvals are complete before the effective date.