# Quality Manual Working Template > **STATUS: DRAFT EXAMPLE — NOT APPROVED — NO CONFORMITY OR COMPLIANCE CLAIM** > > This generic structure is an authoring aid. It cannot determine applicability, > establish an effective QMS, support a certification claim by itself, or replace > authorized management, RA/QA, legal, regulatory, notified-body, or certification- > body review. Obtain ISO standards from ISO or an authorized source; do not paste > copyrighted ISO text into this file. ## 0. Controlled-document metadata | Field | Required entry | |---|---| | Document ID | `` | | Revision | `` | | Status | `draft` / `in-review` / `approved` | | Owner | `` | | Effective date | `` | | Supersedes | `` | | Evidence repository | `` | | Confidentiality | `` | ### Approval | Approval role | Named approver | Decision | Date | Approval evidence ID | |---|---|---|---|---| | Authorized management | `` | `pending` | `` | `` | | RA/QA | `` | `pending` | `` | `` | | Document control | `` | `pending` | `` | `` | **Release gate:** keep status `draft` until every required approver records a decision, open placeholders are resolved, referenced procedures exist, and training/change impacts are approved. ## 1. Purpose and limits - Intended use of this manual: `` - What this manual does not establish: certification, regulatory applicability, product authorization, FDA compliance, MDSAP acceptance, or EU conformity. - Authorized roles that own those determinations: `` ## 2. QMS scope | Scope element | Declared information | Owner | Status | Evidence ID | Approval ID | |---|---|---|---|---|---| | Legal entity/entities | `` | `` | `draft` | `` | `` | | Sites and addresses | `` | `` | `draft` | `` | `` | | Product families | `` | `` | `draft` | `` | `` | | Lifecycle activities | `` | `` | `draft` | `` | `` | | Outsourced processes | `` | `` | `draft` | `` | `` | | Markets considered | `` | `` | `draft` | `` | `` | ### 2.1 Applicability decisions Do not infer applicability from a checklist. Record each decision made by an authorized human. | Topic/process | Decision | Rationale | Source/version | Decision owner | Approval/date | |---|---|---|---|---|---| | `` | `applicable` / `not-applicable` / `undetermined` | `` | `` | `` | `` | `Undetermined` is a blocking status. A `not-applicable` entry requires a documented, approved rationale and must not be described as an automatic exclusion. ## 3. Controlled source and version basis | Source ID | Official title | Edition/version/date | Authorized location | Currency review date | Owner | Impact approval | |---|---|---|---|---|---|---| | `` | `` | `<version>` | `<location/URL>` | `<YYYY-MM-DD>` | `<role>` | `<record ID>` | At minimum, distinguish the source basis used for: - ISO 13485 certification preparation; - FDA QMSR and current 21 CFR Part 820; - MDSAP audit preparation; - EU MDR or IVDR conformity assessment; - product- and market-specific requirements. ## 4. Governance, authority, and responsibilities | Role | Authority and responsibility | Independence/escalation | Delegate | Competence evidence | Approval | |---|---|---|---|---|---| | Top management | `<entry>` | `<entry>` | `<entry>` | `<ID>` | `<ID>` | | Authorized management representative | `<entry>` | `<entry>` | `<entry>` | `<ID>` | `<ID>` | | RA/QA owner | `<entry>` | `<entry>` | `<entry>` | `<ID>` | `<ID>` | | Process owner | `<entry>` | `<entry>` | `<entry>` | `<ID>` | `<ID>` | | Document/record owner | `<entry>` | `<entry>` | `<entry>` | `<ID>` | `<ID>` | ## 5. Process architecture and interactions Use organization-specific processes. Do not copy a standard's clauses as procedures. | Process | Inputs | Outputs | Owner | Controlled procedure | Records/evidence | Measures | Approval | |---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---| | Scope and quality planning | `<entry>` | `<entry>` | `<role>` | `<ID>` | `<IDs>` | `<measure>` | `<ID>` | | Document and record control | `<entry>` | `<entry>` | `<role>` | `<ID>` | `<IDs>` | `<measure>` | `<ID>` | | Risk management | `<entry>` | `<entry>` | `<role>` | `<ID>` | `<IDs>` | `<measure>` | `<ID>` | | Design and development | `<entry>` | `<entry>` | `<role>` | `<ID>` | `<IDs>` | `<measure>` | `<ID>` | | Supplier controls | `<entry>` | `<entry>` | `<role>` | `<ID>` | `<IDs>` | `<measure>` | `<ID>` | | Production/service | `<entry>` | `<entry>` | `<role>` | `<ID>` | `<IDs>` | `<measure>` | `<ID>` | | Validation and software assurance | `<entry>` | `<entry>` | `<role>` | `<ID>` | `<IDs>` | `<measure>` | `<ID>` | | Identification/traceability | `<entry>` | `<entry>` | `<role>` | `<ID>` | `<IDs>` | `<measure>` | `<ID>` | | Complaints, feedback, vigilance | `<entry>` | `<entry>` | `<role>` | `<ID>` | `<IDs>` | `<measure>` | `<ID>` | | Nonconformity and CAPA | `<entry>` | `<entry>` | `<role>` | `<ID>` | `<IDs>` | `<measure>` | `<ID>` | | Internal audit | `<entry>` | `<entry>` | `<role>` | `<ID>` | `<IDs>` | `<measure>` | `<ID>` | | Management review | `<entry>` | `<entry>` | `<role>` | `<ID>` | `<IDs>` | `<measure>` | `<ID>` | | Training and competence | `<entry>` | `<entry>` | `<role>` | `<ID>` | `<IDs>` | `<measure>` | `<ID>` | | Change control | `<entry>` | `<entry>` | `<role>` | `<ID>` | `<IDs>` | `<measure>` | `<ID>` | Attach an approved process interaction map as evidence: `<record ID/location>`. ## 6. Documentation and record controls - Document lifecycle and approval method: `<procedure ID>` - Record integrity, retrieval, retention, and disposition: `<procedure ID>` - External-source version monitoring: `<procedure/register ID>` - Electronic signatures/access controls: `<validated control IDs>` - Training before effective use: `<procedure/evidence IDs>` - Change-impact and linked-document updates: `<procedure/evidence IDs>` ## 7. Product lifecycle controls For each applicable process, describe the policy-level approach and reference controlled evidence. Cover, as applicable: - requirements and product planning; - risk management through production and postmarket feedback; - design/development planning, reviews, transfer, and changes; - supplier and outsourced-process controls; - production, service, infrastructure, work environment, and process controls; - process, test-method, equipment, and software validation; - identification, distribution, and traceability; - acceptance, release, preservation, installation, and servicing. | Topic | Policy summary | Owner | Procedure | Evidence set | Status | Approval | |---|---|---|---|---|---|---| | `<topic>` | `<organization-specific summary>` | `<role>` | `<ID>` | `<IDs>` | `draft` | `<ID>` | ## 8. Feedback, postmarket, and improvement controls Document the links among feedback, complaints, reportability/vigilance decisions, risk updates, nonconformity, CAPA, change control, and management review. | Link | Method | Owner | Input evidence | Output evidence | Approval | |---|---|---|---|---|---| | Complaint → reportability review | `<entry>` | `<role>` | `<IDs>` | `<IDs>` | `<ID>` | | Postmarket signal → risk update | `<entry>` | `<role>` | `<IDs>` | `<IDs>` | `<ID>` | | Nonconformity → CAPA decision | `<entry>` | `<role>` | `<IDs>` | `<IDs>` | `<ID>` | | CAPA → effectiveness review | `<entry>` | `<role>` | `<IDs>` | `<IDs>` | `<ID>` | | Change → validation/training | `<entry>` | `<role>` | `<IDs>` | `<IDs>` | `<ID>` | ## 9. Assurance and oversight | Activity | Scope/frequency basis | Independence | Owner | Evidence | Open actions | Approval | |---|---|---|---|---|---|---| | Internal audit | `<risk-based basis>` | `<controls>` | `<role>` | `<IDs>` | `<IDs>` | `<ID>` | | Management review | `<planned basis>` | `n/a` | `<role>` | `<IDs>` | `<IDs>` | `<ID>` | | Supplier monitoring | `<risk-based basis>` | `<controls>` | `<role>` | `<IDs>` | `<IDs>` | `<ID>` | | Validation review | `<change/risk basis>` | `<controls>` | `<role>` | `<IDs>` | `<IDs>` | `<ID>` | ## 10. Appendices - Controlled procedure and record index: `<ID>` - Source/version ledger: `<ID>` - Organization chart and role authorizations: `<ID>` - Process interaction map: `<ID>` - Product/site/scope register: `<ID>` - Risk-design-production-postmarket traceability matrix: `<ID>` - Open gap and change register: `<ID>` ## Final release checklist - [ ] No placeholder remains. - [ ] Scope and applicability decisions have authorized owners and approvals. - [ ] Every referenced document and record exists at its controlled revision. - [ ] Source versions and currency-review dates are recorded. - [ ] Process interactions and risk/postmarket feedback links are evidenced. - [ ] Product-specific and jurisdiction-specific requirements were reviewed separately. - [ ] Training and change impacts were approved. - [ ] No certification, conformity, compliance, or readiness claim is made by this template. - [ ] Final human approvals are recorded before the effective date.