# Review Criteria by Agency How NIH, NSF, DOE, and DARPA evaluate proposals, criterion by criterion, and what each one rewards in practice. ## Review Criteria by Agency Understanding how proposals are evaluated is critical for writing competitive applications. ### NSF Review Criteria **Intellectual Merit** (primary): - What is the potential for the proposed activity to advance knowledge? - How well-conceived and organized is the proposed activity? - Is there sufficient access to resources? - How well-qualified is the individual, team, or institution to conduct proposed activities? **Broader Impacts** (equally important): - What is the potential for the proposed activity to benefit society? - To what extent does the proposal address broader impacts in meaningful ways? **Additional Considerations**: - Integration of research and education - Diversity and inclusion - Results from prior NSF support (if applicable) ### NIH Review Criteria **Scored Criteria** (1-9 scale, 1 = exceptional, 9 = poor): 1. **Significance** - Addresses important problem or critical barrier - Improves scientific knowledge, technical capability, or clinical practice - Aligns with NIH mission 2. **Investigator(s)** - Well-suited to the project - Track record of accomplishments - Adequate training and expertise 3. **Innovation** - Novel concepts, approaches, methodologies, or interventions - Challenges existing paradigms - Addresses important problem in creative ways 4. **Approach** - Well-reasoned and appropriate - Rigorous and reproducible - Adequately accounts for potential problems - Feasible within timeline 5. **Environment** - Institutional support and resources - Scientific environment contributes to probability of success **Additional Review Considerations** (not scored but discussed): - Protections for human subjects - Inclusion of women, minorities, and children - Vertebrate animal welfare - Biohazards - Resubmission response (if applicable) - Budget and timeline appropriateness ### DOE Review Criteria Varies by program office, but generally includes: - Scientific and/or technical merit - Appropriateness of proposed method or approach - Competency of personnel and adequacy of facilities - Reasonableness and appropriateness of budget - Relevance to DOE mission and program goals ### DARPA Review Criteria **DARPA-specific considerations**: - Overall scientific and technical merit - Potential contribution to DARPA mission - Realism of proposed costs and availability of funds Frame proposals with DARPA-style impact questions when appropriate: - **What if you succeed?** — Impact if the research works - **What if you're right?** — Implications of your hypothesis - **Who cares?** — Why it matters for national security ### NSTC Review Criteria **Core Evaluation Dimensions**: 1. **Innovation (創新性)**: Novelty of concept and approach. 2. **Feasibility (可行性)**: Methodology rigor and preliminary data. 3. **PI Capability (主持人能力)**: Track record and expertise. 4. **Value (價值)**: Academic contribution and societal/industrial impact. For detailed review criteria, refer to `references/nstc_guidelines.md`.