Title: Библиотека непрерывного обучения
Version: 0.9.0
Author: Sasha Chernykh
Lang: ru
Date: 2019-09-15 11:27:54
Modified: 2022-09-08 20:06:48
Summary: Книги для саморазвития
Pagetitle: Библиотека непрерывного обучения
Pagecolors: giologica
Asideimage: NeliaLeaves
Iconleftorright: right
Tags: libraries, lifelong-learning-library, library-for-life
Noco: 1xiGz7
Og_image: https://i.imgur.com/AX4eMwp.jpg
Schemaorgtype: DataCatalog

<!-- MarkdownTOC -->

1. [Описание](#Описание)
1. [Рецензии](#Рецензии)
1. [TODO](#TODO)
1. [Альтруизм](#Альтруизм)
	1. [Do-gooders](#Do-gooders)
		1. [Истории do-gooders](#Истории-do-gooders)
	1. [Сострадание](#Сострадание)
	1. [Социальное предпринимательство](#Социальное-предпринимательство)
		1. [Истории социальных предпринимателей](#Истории-социальных-предпринимателей)
			1. [NR](#NR)
				1. [Истории финансового успеха от первого лица](#Истории-финансового-успеха-от-первого-лица)
	1. [Эффективный альтруизм](#Эффективный-альтруизм)
		1. [Принципы эффективного альтруизма](#Принципы-эффективного-альтруизма)
1. [Аргументация и логика](#Аргументация-и-логика)
	1. [Аргументация](#Аргументация)
		1. [Практическая аргументация](#Практическая-аргументация)
			1. [NR](#NR-1)
				1. [Успехмэн](#Успехмэн)
			1. [Своды правил практической аргументации](#Своды-правил-практической-аргументации)
			1. [Своды правил практической аргументации с упражнениями](#Своды-правил-практической-аргументации-с-упражнениями)
		1. [Теория аргументации](#Теория-аргументации)
			1. [Концепции теории аргументации](#Концепции-теории-аргументации)
			1. [Новая риторика](#Новая-риторика)
				1. [Основы новой риторики](#Основы-новой-риторики)
	1. [Демагогические приёмы](#Демагогические-приёмы)
		1. [Классификация демагогических приёмов](#Классификация-демагогических-приёмов)
			1. [NR](#NR-2)
				1. [Лысенкоизм](#Лысенкоизм)
	1. [Логика](#Логика)
		1. [Логика высказываний](#Логика-высказываний)
			1. [NR](#NR-3)
				1. [Малопрактичность](#Малопрактичность)
		1. [Логика оценок и норм](#Логика-оценок-и-норм)
		1. [Логичное мышление](#Логичное-мышление)
		1. [Понятия логики](#Понятия-логики)
		1. [Практическая логика](#Практическая-логика)
			1. [NR](#NR-4)
				1. [Малопрактичность](#Малопрактичность-1)
		1. [Теория аргументации и логика](#Теория-аргументации-и-логика)
			1. [NR](#NR-5)
				1. [Малопрактичность](#Малопрактичность-2)
		1. [Учебники логики](#Учебники-логики)
			1. [Американские учебники логики](#Американские-учебники-логики)
			1. [Российские учебники логики](#Российские-учебники-логики)
		1. [Формальная логика](#Формальная-логика)
			1. [Научный метод и формальная логика](#Научный-метод-и-формальная-логика)
	1. [Логика доказывания](#Логика-доказывания)
		1. [NR](#NR-6)
			1. [Малопрактичность](#Малопрактичность-3)
	1. [Логические ошибки](#Логические-ошибки)
		1. [Перечни логических ошибок](#Перечни-логических-ошибок)
	1. [Прогнозирование](#Прогнозирование)
		1. [Проблемы предсказаний и байесовская теорема](#Проблемы-предсказаний-и-байесовская-теорема)
			1. [NR](#NR-7)
				1. [Противоречие научным фактам](#Противоречие-научным-фактам)
		1. [Суперпрогнозирование](#Суперпрогнозирование)
	1. [Эристика](#Эристика)
		1. [Теория и практика спора и полемики](#Теория-и-практика-спора-и-полемики)
			1. [NR](#NR-8)
				1. [Написание автором паранаучной статьи](#Написание-автором-паранаучной-статьи)
		1. [Уловки в спорах](#Уловки-в-спорах)
			1. [Логические и психологические уловки в спорах](#Логические-и-психологические-уловки-в-спорах)
			1. [Разновидности уловок в спорах](#Разновидности-уловок-в-спорах)
1. [Атеизм и религия](#Атеизм-и-религия)
	1. [Несовместимость науки и религии](#Несовместимость-науки-и-религии)
1. [Бедность и неравенство](#Бедность-и-неравенство)
	1. [Рандомистское переосмысление борьбы с крайней бедностью](#Рандомистское-переосмысление-борьбы-с-крайней-бедностью)
		1. [HC](#HC)
1. [Благополучие и счастье](#Благополучие-и-счастье)
	1. [Мифы о счастье](#Мифы-о-счастье)
		1. [Мифы о счастье или несчастье при наступлении определённых событий](#Мифы-о-счастье-или-несчастье-при-наступлении-определённых-событий)
	1. [Нейронауки о счастье](#Нейронауки-о-счастье)
		1. [Социальные детерминанты химического счастья мозга](#Социальные-детерминанты-химического-счастья-мозга)
	1. [Позитивная психология счастья](#Позитивная-психология-счастья)
		1. [Пирог счастья](#Пирог-счастья)
			1. [40-процентное решение](#40-процентное-решение)
1. [Закон](#Закон)
	1. [Восстановительное правосудие](#Восстановительное-правосудие)
		1. [Восстановительная медиация и возможности её применения в России](#Восстановительная-медиация-и-возможности-её-применения-в-России)
	1. [Правовая психология](#Правовая-психология)
		1. [Направления изучения психолого-правовых феноменов](#Направления-изучения-психолого-правовых-феноменов)
	1. [Правовой нигилизм](#Правовой-нигилизм)
		1. [Российский правовой нигилизм](#Российский-правовой-нигилизм)
	1. [Правосудие на практике](#Правосудие-на-практике)
		1. [Реалии принятия решений судьями Восточной Европы](#Реалии-принятия-решений-судьями-Восточной-Европы)
		1. [Российская практика участия в судебных делах](#Российская-практика-участия-в-судебных-делах)
	1. [Справедливое правосудие](#Справедливое-правосудие)
		1. [Разница между стандартами справедливого правосудия и российской судебной практикой](#Разница-между-стандартами-справедливого-правосудия-и-российской-судебной-практикой)
	1. [Философия права](#Философия-права)
		1. [Аналитическая философия права](#Аналитическая-философия-права)
			1. [Правовой позитивизм Герберта Харта](#Правовой-позитивизм-Герберта-Харта)
1. [Здоровье](#Здоровье)
	1. [Алкоголь](#Алкоголь)
		1. [Медикализация употребления алкоголя](#Медикализация-употребления-алкоголя)
			1. [HC](#HC-1)
		1. [Самопомощь при проблемах с алкоголем](#Самопомощь-при-проблемах-с-алкоголем)
			1. [Контролируемое употребление алкоголя](#Контролируемое-употребление-алкоголя)
	1. [Будущее медицины](#Будущее-медицины)
	1. [Врачебная этика](#Врачебная-этика)
	1. [Выгорание](#Выгорание)
		1. [NR](#NR-9)
			1. [Паранаучные теории](#Паранаучные-теории)
		1. [Исследования выгорания](#Исследования-выгорания)
		1. [Управление выгоранием и его профилактика](#Управление-выгоранием-и-его-профилактика)
		1. [Устные истории переживших выгорание](#Устные-истории-переживших-выгорание)
			1. [NR](#NR-10)
				1. [НЛП](#НЛП)
	1. [Доказательная медицина](#Доказательная-медицина)
		1. [История доказательной медицины](#История-доказательной-медицины)
		1. [Учебники по доказательной медицине](#Учебники-по-доказательной-медицине)
	1. [Клиническое мышление](#Клиническое-мышление)
	1. [Медицинская грамотность](#Медицинская-грамотность)
	1. [Превентивная медицина](#Превентивная-медицина)
	1. [Псевдодиагностика](#Псевдодиагностика)
	1. [Сон](#Сон)
		1. [Бессонница](#Бессонница)
			1. [Психотерапия при бессоннице](#Психотерапия-при-бессоннице)
	1. [Стресс](#Стресс)
		1. [Управление стрессом и его профилактика](#Управление-стрессом-и-его-профилактика)
	1. [Тёмная сторона рынка здравоохранения](#Тёмная-сторона-рынка-здравоохранения)
	1. [Усталость](#Усталость)
		1. [Утомление](#Утомление)
		1. [Хроническая усталость](#Хроническая-усталость)
			1. [NR](#NR-11)
				1. [Недостоверная информация](#Недостоверная-информация)
				1. [Практикование парамедицины](#Практикование-парамедицины)
	1. [Физическая активность](#Физическая-активность)
1. [Зоозащита](#Зоозащита)
	1. [Борьба за освобождение животных](#Борьба-за-освобождение-животных)
		1. [Создание веганского мира](#Создание-веганского-мира)
			1. [NR](#NR-12)
				1. [Активист-непрофессионал](#Активист-непрофессионал)
	1. [Диалог веганов и мясоедов](#Диалог-веганов-и-мясоедов)
	1. [Дискриминация веганов](#Дискриминация-веганов)
	1. [Карнизм](#Карнизм)
	1. [Критика вегетарианства](#Критика-вегетарианства)
		1. [NR](#NR-13)
			1. [Недостоверная информация](#Недостоверная-информация-1)
	1. [Критическая теория и животные](#Критическая-теория-и-животные)
		1. [Интерсекциональная критика зоозащитных движений](#Интерсекциональная-критика-зоозащитных-движений)
			1. [Wrenn Corey Lee](#Wrenn-Corey-Lee)
1. [Инновации](#Инновации)
	1. [Краудсорсинг](#Краудсорсинг)
	1. [Свободные инновации](#Свободные-инновации)
1. [Интеллект и мышление](#Интеллект-и-мышление)
	1. [Изучение иностранных языков](#Изучение-иностранных-языков)
		1. [Ключи для запоминания иностранных слов](#Ключи-для-запоминания-иностранных-слов)
			1. [NR](#NR-14)
				1. [Непрофессионализм](#Непрофессионализм)
	1. [Когнитивная психология](#Когнитивная-психология)
		1. [Введение в когнитивную психологию](#Введение-в-когнитивную-психологию)
		1. [Структурно-динамическая теория интеллекта](#Структурно-динамическая-теория-интеллекта)
		1. [Установка](#Установка)
		1. [Экспериментальная когнитивная психология](#Экспериментальная-когнитивная-психология)
	1. [Концепции мышления](#Концепции-мышления)
	1. [Мнемоника](#Мнемоника)
		1. [NR](#NR-15)
			1. [Непрофессионализм](#Непрофессионализм-1)
		1. [Учебники по мнемонике](#Учебники-по-мнемонике)
	1. [Новые медиа и интеллект](#Новые-медиа-и-интеллект)
		1. [NR](#NR-16)
			1. [Недостоверная информация](#Недостоверная-информация-2)
	1. [Открытое мышление](#Открытое-мышление)
		1. [NR](#NR-17)
			1. [Непрофессионализм](#Непрофессионализм-2)
	1. [Память](#Память)
		1. [Непроизвольное запоминание](#Непроизвольное-запоминание)
	1. [Продуктивное мышление](#Продуктивное-мышление)
	1. [Системное мышление](#Системное-мышление)
		1. [NR](#NR-18)
			1. [НЛП-коачи](#НЛП-коачи)
	1. [ТРИЗ](#ТРИЗ)
		1. [NR](#NR-19)
			1. [Признаки паранауки](#Признаки-паранауки)
1. [Интеллектуалы](#Интеллектуалы)
	1. [Индустрия идей](#Индустрия-идей)
	1. [Моральная ответственность интеллектуалов](#Моральная-ответственность-интеллектуалов)
	1. [Публичные интеллектуалы](#Публичные-интеллектуалы)
1. [Интуитивные теории](#Интуитивные-теории)
	1. [Естественнонаучные интуитивные теории](#Естественнонаучные-интуитивные-теории)
	1. [Интуитивные теории о проблемах XXI века](#Интуитивные-теории-о-проблемах-XXI-века)
1. [История](#История)
	1. [Историческое источниковедение](#Историческое-источниковедение)
	1. [Политизация истории](#Политизация-истории)
	1. [Украинская история](#Украинская-история)
		1. [Диалоги об украинской истории](#Диалоги-об-украинской-истории)
1. [Капитализм](#Капитализм)
	1. [Коммодификация](#Коммодификация)
		1. [Нерыночные культурные практики](#Нерыночные-культурные-практики)
	1. [Неолиберализм](#Неолиберализм)
		1. [Анти-неолиберальные мифы экономики](#Анти-неолиберальные-мифы-экономики)
		1. [Нищета нового дирижизма](#Нищета-нового-дирижизма)
			1. [NR](#NR-20)
				1. [Ненаучные утверждения](#Ненаучные-утверждения)
	1. [Рыночная экономика](#Рыночная-экономика)
		1. [Бестолковость повсеместной рыночной конкуренции](#Бестолковость-повсеместной-рыночной-конкуренции)
		1. [Мифы свободно-рыночного капитализма](#Мифы-свободно-рыночного-капитализма)
		1. [Функционирование рынка](#Функционирование-рынка)
			1. [HC](#HC-2)
1. [Конфликт](#Конфликт)
	1. [Диалог на сложные темы](#Диалог-на-сложные-темы)
	1. [Диалоги о конфронтации](#Диалоги-о-конфронтации)
	1. [Межличностный конфликт](#Межличностный-конфликт)
	1. [Производственный конфликт](#Производственный-конфликт)
		1. [Производственный конфликт для тренеров](#Производственный-конфликт-для-тренеров)
			1. [NR](#NR-21)
				1. [Коачинг](#Коачинг)
	1. [Психофизиология конфликта](#Психофизиология-конфликта)
	1. [Социальный конфликт](#Социальный-конфликт)
		1. [Базовые положения теорий социального конфликта](#Базовые-положения-теорий-социального-конфликта)
1. [Критика](#Критика)
	1. [Инакомыслие](#Инакомыслие)
		1. [NR](#NR-22)
			1. [Истории финансового успеха от первого лица](#Истории-финансового-успеха-от-первого-лица-1)
		1. [Неудобные идеи](#Неудобные-идеи)
1. [Критическое мышление](#Критическое-мышление)
	1. [Введение в критическое мышление](#Введение-в-критическое-мышление)
	1. [Оценка информации](#Оценка-информации)
	1. [Психология критического мышления](#Психология-критического-мышления)
	1. [Развитие критического мышления](#Развитие-критического-мышления)
	1. [Учебники по критическому мышлению](#Учебники-по-критическому-мышлению)
		1. [Ружиэйро Винсент Райан](#Ружиэйро-Винсент-Райан)
1. [Культура](#Культура)
	1. [Книгоиздание](#Книгоиздание)
		1. [Превращение книгоиздания в индустрию потребления](#Превращение-книгоиздания-в-индустрию-потребления)
	1. [Культурные индустрии](#Культурные-индустрии)
1. [Культурные войны](#Культурные-войны)
	1. [Академические левые](#Академические-левые)
		1. [Паранаучность академических левых](#Паранаучность-академических-левых)
			1. [NR](#NR-23)
				1. [Академический вокизм](#Академический-вокизм)
		1. [Постмодернистские теории религии социальной справедливости](#Постмодернистские-теории-религии-социальной-справедливости)
			1. [NR](#NR-24)
				1. [Недостоверная информация](#Недостоверная-информация-3)
	1. [Аргументация прогрессивных левых](#Аргументация-прогрессивных-левых)
	1. [Дебаты на темы культурных войн](#Дебаты-на-темы-культурных-войн)
	1. [Культурные войны в высших учебных заведениях](#Культурные-войны-в-высших-учебных-заведениях)
		1. [Сейфтизм](#Сейфтизм)
		1. [Снежинки](#Снежинки)
	1. [Мифы правых XXI века](#Мифы-правых-XXI-века)
	1. [Популизм](#Популизм)
		1. [HC](#HC-3)
1. [Ложь и постправда](#Ложь-и-постправда)
	1. [Bullshit](#Bullshit)
	1. [Pro Truth](#Pro-Truth)
	1. [Информационные войны](#Информационные-войны)
	1. [Конкурирующие правды](#Конкурирующие-правды)
		1. [NR](#NR-25)
			1. [Непрофессионализм](#Непрофессионализм-3)
	1. [Манипулирование](#Манипулирование)
		1. [Манипуляция сознанием](#Манипуляция-сознанием)
			1. [NR](#NR-26)
				1. [Недостоверная информация](#Недостоверная-информация-4)
		1. [Медиаманипулирование](#Медиаманипулирование)
			1. [NR](#NR-27)
				1. [Репутация автора](#Репутация-автора)
		1. [Разновидности манипулятивных воздействий](#Разновидности-манипулятивных-воздействий)
			1. [NR](#NR-28)
				1. [Непрофессионализм](#Непрофессионализм-4)
	1. [Пиар](#Пиар)
		1. [Конструирование пиаром ложных представлений по важнейшим вопросам](#Конструирование-пиаром-ложных-представлений-по-важнейшим-вопросам)
		1. [Основы PR-пропаганды](#Основы-PR-пропаганды)
	1. [Поляризация](#Поляризация)
		1. [Догматизм в поляризованном обществе](#Догматизм-в-поляризованном-обществе)
			1. [Общество всезнаек](#Общество-всезнаек)
	1. [Пропаганда](#Пропаганда)
		1. [Антироссийская пропаганда](#Антироссийская-пропаганда)
			1. [NR](#NR-29)
				1. [Недостоверная информация](#Недостоверная-информация-5)
		1. [Пропагандистские методы и техники](#Пропагандистские-методы-и-техники)
			1. [NR](#NR-30)
				1. [Непрофессионализм](#Непрофессионализм-5)
		1. [Психология пропаганды](#Психология-пропаганды)
	1. [Радикальная честность](#Радикальная-честность)
	1. [Распознавание лжи](#Распознавание-лжи)
		1. [NR](#NR-31)
			1. [Критика научного сообщества](#Критика-научного-сообщества)
	1. [Речевое манипулирование](#Речевое-манипулирование)
	1. [Фейковые новости](#Фейковые-новости)
		1. [Психология воздействия фейковых новостей](#Психология-воздействия-фейковых-новостей)
		1. [Учебные пособия для журналистов по противодействию fake news](#Учебные-пособия-для-журналистов-по-противодействию-fake-news)
		1. [Фактчекинг](#Фактчекинг)
			1. [Практический фактчекинг](#Практический-фактчекинг)
	1. [Этичная журналистика](#Этичная-журналистика)
1. [Любовь](#Любовь)
	1. [Безответная любовь](#Безответная-любовь)
	1. [Биология любви](#Биология-любви)
	1. [Любовная аддикция](#Любовная-аддикция)
		1. [NR](#NR-32)
			1. [Паранаучный бэкграунд автора](#Паранаучный-бэкграунд-автора)
	1. [Микромоменты любви](#Микромоменты-любви)
	1. [Привязанность](#Привязанность)
	1. [Сильная любовь](#Сильная-любовь)
	1. [Социология любви](#Социология-любви)
	1. [Философия любви](#Философия-любви)
1. [Математика](#Математика)
	1. [Манипуляции с числами](#Манипуляции-с-числами)
	1. [Математическая медиаграмотность](#Математическая-медиаграмотность)
1. [Медиа](#Медиа)
	1. [Воздействие СМИ](#Воздействие-СМИ)
	1. [Миф об объективности либеральных медиа](#Миф-об-объективности-либеральных-медиа)
		1. [NR](#NR-33)
			1. [Непрофессионализм](#Непрофессионализм-6)
	1. [Пропагандистский блиц](#Пропагандистский-блиц)
		1. [NR](#NR-34)
			1. [Непрофессионализм](#Непрофессионализм-7)
1. [Менеджмент](#Менеджмент)
	1. [Бюрократия](#Бюрократия)
		1. [Бюрократия в госуправлении](#Бюрократия-в-госуправлении)
	1. [Доказательный менеджмент](#Доказательный-менеджмент)
	1. [Кибернетика в госуправлении](#Кибернетика-в-госуправлении)
		1. [Неформат](#Неформат)
			1. [Книга для крупных производств](#Книга-для-крупных-производств)
	1. [Мифы о менеджменте](#Мифы-о-менеджменте)
		1. [Критика литературы об успешном бизнесе](#Критика-литературы-об-успешном-бизнесе)
		1. [Мифы о лидерстве](#Мифы-о-лидерстве)
	1. [Управление человеческими ресурсами](#Управление-человеческими-ресурсами)
	1. [Учебники по менеджменту](#Учебники-по-менеджменту)
		1. [NR](#NR-35)
			1. [Истории финансового успеха от первого лица](#Истории-финансового-успеха-от-первого-лица-2)
1. [Ментальное здоровье](#Ментальное-здоровье)
	1. [Ментальные расстройства](#Ментальные-расстройства)
		1. [Малявин Максим Иванович](#Малявин-Максим-Иванович)
	1. [Мифы о ментальном здоровье](#Мифы-о-ментальном-здоровье)
	1. [Работа психиатра](#Работа-психиатра)
1. [Мир \(мiръ\)](#Мир-мiръ)
	1. [Прогресс](#Прогресс)
		1. [Оптимистичный взгляд на прогресс](#Оптимистичный-взгляд-на-прогресс)
			1. [NR](#NR-36)
				1. [Критика](#Критика-1)
1. [Написание текстов](#Написание-текстов)
	1. [Корректура](#Корректура)
	1. [Написание нехудожественных текстов](#Написание-нехудожественных-текстов)
		1. [NR](#NR-37)
			1. [Непрофессионализм](#Непрофессионализм-8)
		1. [Работа над стилем нехудожественных текстов](#Работа-над-стилем-нехудожественных-текстов)
1. [Наука](#Наука)
	1. [Биографии учёных](#Биографии-учёных)
		1. [Социальные биографии героев, злодеев и конформистов советской и российской науки](#Социальные-биографии-героев-злодеев-и-конформистов-советской-и-российской-науки)
		1. [Тесла Никола](#Тесла-Никола)
	1. [Влиятельные интересы в науке](#Влиятельные-интересы-в-науке)
		1. [Наука на службе у пиара](#Наука-на-службе-у-пиара)
			1. [NR](#NR-38)
				1. [ВИЧ-диссидентство и антисемитизм](#ВИЧ-диссидентство-и-антисемитизм)
		1. [Проплаченная наука](#Проплаченная-наука)
		1. [Торговцы сомнениями](#Торговцы-сомнениями)
	1. [Война с наукой](#Война-с-наукой)
	1. [Исследования](#Исследования)
		1. [Качественные исследования](#Качественные-исследования)
			1. [Процесс качественного исследования](#Процесс-качественного-исследования)
		1. [Процесс исследования](#Процесс-исследования)
	1. [Лексиконы заблуждений](#Лексиконы-заблуждений)
		1. [NR](#NR-39)
			1. [Копирайтеры](#Копирайтеры)
		1. [Естественнонаучные заблуждения](#Естественнонаучные-заблуждения)
	1. [Менеджерский подход к науке](#Менеджерский-подход-к-науке)
		1. [Научная несостоятельность библиометрии](#Научная-несостоятельность-библиометрии)
	1. [Мир науки изнутри](#Мир-науки-изнутри)
		1. [Жизнь учёного](#Жизнь-учёного)
		1. [Мифы историй великих научных открытий](#Мифы-историй-великих-научных-открытий)
		1. [HC](#HC-4)
		1. [Научное мошенничество](#Научное-мошенничество)
			1. [NR](#NR-40)
				1. [Критика](#Критика-2)
		1. [Повседневная деятельность учёных](#Повседневная-деятельность-учёных)
		1. [Разновидности злоупотреблений учёных](#Разновидности-злоупотреблений-учёных)
	1. [Наука для повседневности](#Наука-для-повседневности)
		1. [Научное рассмотрение вопросов повседневной жизни](#Научное-рассмотрение-вопросов-повседневной-жизни)
	1. [Научная картина мира](#Научная-картина-мира)
		1. [Естественнонаучная картина мира](#Естественнонаучная-картина-мира)
		1. [Законы мироздания](#Законы-мироздания)
	1. [Научная коммуникация](#Научная-коммуникация)
		1. [Индивидуальный научный пиар для учёных](#Индивидуальный-научный-пиар-для-учёных)
	1. [Научный скептицизм](#Научный-скептицизм)
		1. [Индивидуальное противостояние ненаучной ерунде](#Индивидуальное-противостояние-ненаучной-ерунде)
		1. [Нормативно неуместное инакомыслие \(NID\)](#Нормативно-неуместное-инакомыслие-NID)
			1. [HC](#HC-5)
		1. [Основные разновидности дениализма](#Основные-разновидности-дениализма)
		1. [Психология веры в ненаучную ерунду](#Психология-веры-в-ненаучную-ерунду)
		1. [Руководства по научному скептицизму](#Руководства-по-научному-скептицизму)
		1. [Теории заговора](#Теории-заговора)
			1. [Психология веры в теории заговора](#Психология-веры-в-теории-заговора)
	1. [Образ науки](#Образ-науки)
		1. [Ироническое представление образа науки](#Ироническое-представление-образа-науки)
		1. [Неверные представления о науке](#Неверные-представления-о-науке)
			1. [Неверные представления о науке и естественнонаучные заблуждения](#Неверные-представления-о-науке-и-естественнонаучные-заблуждения)
	1. [Общественное восприятие науки](#Общественное-восприятие-науки)
		1. [Отклонение научной культуры западным обществом](#Отклонение-научной-культуры-западным-обществом)
		1. [Причины научной безграмотности общества](#Причины-научной-безграмотности-общества)
			1. [HC](#HC-6)
	1. [Ошибочные идеи в науке](#Ошибочные-идеи-в-науке)
	1. [Паранаука](#Паранаука)
		1. [Паранормальные явления](#Паранормальные-явления)
			1. [Критическое мышление к паранормальным явлениям](#Критическое-мышление-к-паранормальным-явлениям)
			1. [Объяснение паранормальных явлений](#Объяснение-паранормальных-явлений)
		1. [Распознавание паранауки](#Распознавание-паранауки)
			1. [NR](#NR-41)
				1. [Агрессивный скептицизм](#Агрессивный-скептицизм)
	1. [Советская и российская наука](#Советская-и-российская-наука)
		1. [Неприглядные реалии советской и российской науки](#Неприглядные-реалии-советской-и-российской-науки)
		1. [Развал российской науки](#Развал-российской-науки)
			1. [NR](#NR-42)
				1. [Издание без согласия с автором](#Издание-без-согласия-с-автором)
	1. [Социология науки](#Социология-науки)
		1. [История роли учёного в обществе](#История-роли-учёного-в-обществе)
	1. [Философия и эпистемология науки](#Философия-и-эпистемология-науки)
		1. [Внутреннее функционирование механизмов науки](#Внутреннее-функционирование-механизмов-науки)
		1. [Научность теорий](#Научность-теорий)
		1. [Научные революции](#Научные-революции)
			1. [Научная революция в биологической систематике](#Научная-революция-в-биологической-систематике)
		1. [Научный метод](#Научный-метод)
			1. [NR](#NR-43)
				1. [Распространение автором теорий заговора](#Распространение-автором-теорий-заговора)
		1. [Процесс научного познания](#Процесс-научного-познания)
			1. [Парадоксы процесса научного познания](#Парадоксы-процесса-научного-познания)
		1. [Сравнительная эпистемология](#Сравнительная-эпистемология)
			1. [Теория стиля мышления и мыслительного коллектива](#Теория-стиля-мышления-и-мыслительного-коллектива)
		1. [Философия математики, механики и физики](#Философия-математики-механики-и-физики)
	1. [Элегантные научные теории](#Элегантные-научные-теории)
1. [Нейронауки](#Нейронауки)
	1. [Биологические ловушки мозга](#Биологические-ловушки-мозга)
	1. [История нейронаук](#История-нейронаук)
	1. [Нейромания](#Нейромания)
	1. [Учебники по когнитивным нейронаукам](#Учебники-по-когнитивным-нейронаукам)
		1. [«Мозг, познание, разум»](#«Мозг-познание-разум»)
1. [Образ жизни](#Образ-жизни)
	1. [Экологичный образ жизни](#Экологичный-образ-жизни)
		1. [NR](#NR-44)
			1. [Паранаучный бэкграунд автора](#Паранаучный-бэкграунд-автора-1)
1. [Образование](#Образование)
	1. [Быстрое обучение](#Быстрое-обучение)
		1. [NR](#NR-45)
			1. [Гуру](#Гуру)
	1. [Важность гуманитарных наук в образовании](#Важность-гуманитарных-наук-в-образовании)
	1. [Искусство обучать](#Искусство-обучать)
	1. [Критика системы образования](#Критика-системы-образования)
		1. [Деструктивные неолиберальные реформы российского образования](#Деструктивные-неолиберальные-реформы-российского-образования)
		1. [Пресечение внедрения сомнительных образовательных практик](#Пресечение-внедрения-сомнительных-образовательных-практик)
		1. [Сигнальная модель образования](#Сигнальная-модель-образования)
			1. [HC](#HC-7)
		1. [Тирания школьного образования](#Тирания-школьного-образования)
			1. [NR](#NR-46)
				1. [Недостоверная информация](#Недостоверная-информация-6)
	1. [Нейробиология обучения](#Нейробиология-обучения)
	1. [Педагогические технологии](#Педагогические-технологии)
		1. [Инновационные модели обучения](#Инновационные-модели-обучения)
		1. [Энциклопедия образовательных технологий](#Энциклопедия-образовательных-технологий)
	1. [Программированное обучение](#Программированное-обучение)
	1. [Психология обучения](#Психология-обучения)
1. [Общество](#Общество)
	1. [Бесчеловечность](#Бесчеловечность)
	1. [Гражданская культура](#Гражданская-культура)
		1. [Аморальный фамилизм](#Аморальный-фамилизм)
			1. [HC](#HC-8)
	1. [Общество спектакля](#Общество-спектакля)
	1. [Российское общество](#Российское-общество)
		1. [Общественное мнение россиян середины нулевых](#Общественное-мнение-россиян-середины-нулевых)
1. [Отношения](#Отношения)
	1. [Теория реализации ценностей](#Теория-реализации-ценностей)
1. [Питание](#Питание)
	1. [Веганское питание](#Веганское-питание)
		1. [Веганское питание для мозга](#Веганское-питание-для-мозга)
			1. [NR](#NR-47)
				1. [Недостоверная информация](#Недостоверная-информация-7)
		1. [Клише и мифы о веганском питании](#Клише-и-мифы-о-веганском-питании)
			1. [NR](#NR-48)
				1. [Непрофессионализм](#Непрофессионализм-9)
	1. [Вегетарианское питание](#Вегетарианское-питание)
	1. [Питание для мозга](#Питание-для-мозга)
		1. [NR](#NR-49)
			1. [Паранаучные утверждения](#Паранаучные-утверждения)
	1. [Рациональное питание](#Рациональное-питание)
		1. [NR](#NR-50)
			1. [Недостоверная информация](#Недостоверная-информация-8)
			1. [Паранаучные утверждения](#Паранаучные-утверждения-1)
1. [Повседневность](#Повседневность)
	1. [Революция повседневной жизни](#Революция-повседневной-жизни)
1. [Политика](#Политика)
	1. [Введение в политологию](#Введение-в-политологию)
		1. [NR](#NR-51)
			1. [Непрофессионализм](#Непрофессионализм-10)
	1. [Выборы](#Выборы)
		1. [Вызывание электоральным фундаментализмом синдрома демократической усталости](#Вызывание-электоральным-фундаментализмом-синдрома-демократической-усталости)
	1. [Демократия](#Демократия)
		1. [Возникновение и консолидация демократии](#Возникновение-и-консолидация-демократии)
		1. [Эволюционный подход к исследованию демократии](#Эволюционный-подход-к-исследованию-демократии)
	1. [Наука и власть](#Наука-и-власть)
		1. [Внедрение власти научного знания](#Внедрение-власти-научного-знания)
		1. [Интеллектуалы-консультанты в правительстве](#Интеллектуалы-консультанты-в-правительстве)
		1. [Коммуникация науки и власти](#Коммуникация-науки-и-власти)
			1. [Научно-экспертная поддержка власти в России и мире](#Научно-экспертная-поддержка-власти-в-России-и-мире)
		1. [Манипуляции политиков с научными фактами](#Манипуляции-политиков-с-научными-фактами)
		1. [Научная организация управленческого труда российских органов власти](#Научная-организация-управленческого-труда-российских-органов-власти)
		1. [Сомнительная польза околовластных интеллектуалов](#Сомнительная-польза-околовластных-интеллектуалов)
			1. [Несостоятельность американских оборонных интеллектуалов в годы холодной войны](#Несостоятельность-американских-оборонных-интеллектуалов-в-годы-холодной-войны)
		1. [Фабрики мысли](#Фабрики-мысли)
			1. [Фабрики мысли США середины XX века](#Фабрики-мысли-США-середины-XX-века)
	1. [Повседневность политиков](#Повседневность-политиков)
		1. [Повседневная работа британского парламента](#Повседневная-работа-британского-парламента)
	1. [Политическая наука конца XX века](#Политическая-наука-конца-XX-века)
	1. [Политическая психология](#Политическая-психология)
		1. [Учебники политической психологии](#Учебники-политической-психологии)
	1. [Политическая философия](#Политическая-философия)
		1. [Основные школы политической мысли](#Основные-школы-политической-мысли)
	1. [Политическое прогнозирование](#Политическое-прогнозирование)
		1. [Меньшая никудышность политических прогнозов «лис» в сравнении с «ежами»](#Меньшая-никудышность-политических-прогнозов-«лис»-в-сравнении-с-«ежами»)
	1. [Принятие политических решений](#Принятие-политических-решений)
		1. [Принятие внешнеполитических решений в России](#Принятие-внешнеполитических-решений-в-России)
	1. [Сравнительная политология](#Сравнительная-политология)
		1. [Учебники сравнительной политологии](#Учебники-сравнительной-политологии)
	1. [Теории политики](#Теории-политики)
		1. [Эмпирические политические теории](#Эмпирические-политические-теории)
	1. [Учебники по политологии](#Учебники-по-политологии)
1. [Потребление](#Потребление)
	1. [Ильин Алексей Николаевич](#Ильин-Алексей-Николаевич)
	1. [Макдональдизация](#Макдональдизация)
1. [Предрассудки и социальный контроль](#Предрассудки-и-социальный-контроль)
	1. [Межгрупповой контакт](#Межгрупповой-контакт)
	1. [Стереотипы](#Стереотипы)
		1. [Угроза подтверждения стереотипа](#Угроза-подтверждения-стереотипа)
	1. [Стигма](#Стигма)
1. [Профессионализм](#Профессионализм)
	1. [Смерть экспертизы](#Смерть-экспертизы)
	1. [Экспертократия](#Экспертократия)
1. [Психология](#Психология)
	1. [Бихевиоризм](#Бихевиоризм)
		1. [Общественное значение бихевиористской психологии](#Общественное-значение-бихевиористской-психологии)
			1. [NR](#NR-52)
				1. [Масштабные фальсификации автора](#Масштабные-фальсификации-автора)
	1. [Введение в психологию](#Введение-в-психологию)
	1. [История психологии](#История-психологии)
		1. [История психологии как независимой дисциплины](#История-психологии-как-независимой-дисциплины)
	1. [Ключевые психологические понятия](#Ключевые-психологические-понятия)
	1. [Мифы популярной психологии](#Мифы-популярной-психологии)
	1. [Негатив](#Негатив)
		1. [Эффект негативности](#Эффект-негативности)
	1. [Правильное понимание психологии](#Правильное-понимание-психологии)
	1. [Прикладная психология](#Прикладная-психология)
	1. [Психологи](#Психологи)
		1. [Биографии психологов-классиков](#Биографии-психологов-классиков)
		1. [Интервью с выдающимися психологами начала XXI века](#Интервью-с-выдающимися-психологами-начала-XXI-века)
	1. [Психологическое письмо](#Психологическое-письмо)
		1. [Примеры необходимости примеров в психологическом письме](#Примеры-необходимости-примеров-в-психологическом-письме)
	1. [Системы психологии](#Системы-психологии)
	1. [Социальная психология](#Социальная-психология)
		1. [Познание людьми друг друга](#Познание-людьми-друг-друга)
			1. [Восприятие и понимание человеком человека](#Восприятие-и-понимание-человеком-человека)
		1. [Учебники по социальной психологии](#Учебники-по-социальной-психологии)
			1. [Американские учебники социальной психологии](#Американские-учебники-социальной-психологии)
			1. [Европейские учебники социальной психологии](#Европейские-учебники-социальной-психологии)
	1. [Учебники психологии](#Учебники-психологии)
	1. [Экспериментальная психология](#Экспериментальная-психология)
		1. [Классические психологические эксперименты](#Классические-психологические-эксперименты)
		1. [Проведение психологических экспериментов](#Проведение-психологических-экспериментов)
1. [Работа](#Работа)
	1. [Базовый доход](#Базовый-доход)
		1. [HC](#HC-9)
	1. [Безработица](#Безработица)
		1. [Устные истории о безработице](#Устные-истории-о-безработице)
	1. [Бредовая работа](#Бредовая-работа)
	1. [Гибкий капитализм](#Гибкий-капитализм)
	1. [Личность и работа](#Личность-и-работа)
	1. [Молодые рабочие](#Молодые-рабочие)
	1. [Невидимая работа](#Невидимая-работа)
		1. [Устные истории о невидимой работе](#Устные-истории-о-невидимой-работе)
	1. [Неполный рабочий день](#Неполный-рабочий-день)
	1. [Прекариат](#Прекариат)
		1. [Российский прекариат](#Российский-прекариат)
	1. [Работа ради будущего](#Работа-ради-будущего)
	1. [Работающие бедные](#Работающие-бедные)
		1. [Бургер флипперы](#Бургер-флипперы)
			1. [HC](#HC-10)
	1. [Свобода слова на работе](#Свобода-слова-на-работе)
	1. [Свободное время](#Свободное-время)
		1. [Необходимость сокращения рабочего времени](#Необходимость-сокращения-рабочего-времени)
	1. [Социология работы](#Социология-работы)
	1. [Техно-тейлоризм](#Техно-тейлоризм)
	1. [Труд](#Труд)
		1. [Организация труда](#Организация-труда)
			1. [Организация коллективного творческого труда](#Организация-коллективного-творческого-труда)
			1. [Организация рабочего труда](#Организация-рабочего-труда)
		1. [Отчуждение труда](#Отчуждение-труда)
		1. [Стимулирование труда](#Стимулирование-труда)
	1. [Устные истории о работе](#Устные-истории-о-работе)
1. [Рациональность](#Рациональность)
	1. [Иррациональность](#Иррациональность)
	1. [Когнитивные искажения](#Когнитивные-искажения)
	1. [Ментальные ловушки](#Ментальные-ловушки)
		1. [NR](#NR-53)
			1. [Истории финансового успеха от первого лица](#Истории-финансового-успеха-от-первого-лица-3)
	1. [Принятие решений](#Принятие-решений)
		1. [Математическая теория принятия решений](#Математическая-теория-принятия-решений)
			1. [NR](#NR-54)
				1. [Научный стиль](#Научный-стиль)
	1. [Рассуждения](#Рассуждения)
	1. [Рациональное мышление](#Рациональное-мышление)
	1. [Рисковая грамотность](#Рисковая-грамотность)
	1. [Самооправдания](#Самооправдания)
1. [Самоконтроль](#Самоконтроль)
	1. [Самоконтроль по телеологическому бихевиоризму](#Самоконтроль-по-телеологическому-бихевиоризму)
	1. [Саморегуляция](#Саморегуляция)
		1. [Аутогенная тренировка](#Аутогенная-тренировка)
1. [Саморазвитие](#Саморазвитие)
	1. [Антропотехника](#Антропотехника)
		1. [Неолиберальная эксплуатация антропотехники](#Неолиберальная-эксплуатация-антропотехники)
	1. [Жизненные перемены](#Жизненные-перемены)
		1. [NR](#NR-55)
			1. [Истории финансового успеха от первого лица](#Истории-финансового-успеха-от-первого-лица-4)
	1. [Зеттелькастен](#Зеттелькастен)
	1. [Индустрия саморазвития](#Индустрия-саморазвития)
		1. [Роль гуру саморазвития в Германии и Китае](#Роль-гуру-саморазвития-в-Германии-и-Китае)
	1. [Книги по саморазвитию](#Книги-по-саморазвитию)
		1. [Понимание феномена книг по саморазвитию](#Понимание-феномена-книг-по-саморазвитию)
	1. [Концентрация и внимание](#Концентрация-и-внимание)
		1. [NR](#NR-56)
			1. [Гуру](#Гуру-1)
			1. [Недостоверная информация](#Недостоверная-информация-9)
			1. [Непрофессионализм](#Непрофессионализм-11)
			1. [Паранаука](#Паранаука-1)
	1. [Мотивация](#Мотивация)
	1. [Наведение порядка](#Наведение-порядка)
		1. [NR](#NR-57)
			1. [Гуру](#Гуру-2)
	1. [Осознанное развитие](#Осознанное-развитие)
	1. [Поиск себя](#Поиск-себя)
		1. [NR](#NR-58)
			1. [Истории финансового успеха от первого лица](#Истории-финансового-успеха-от-первого-лица-5)
	1. [Привычки](#Привычки)
		1. [NR](#NR-59)
			1. [Паранаучный бэкграунд редактора](#Паранаучный-бэкграунд-редактора)
	1. [Принципы успешных людей](#Принципы-успешных-людей)
		1. [NR](#NR-60)
			1. [Паранаука](#Паранаука-2)
	1. [Продуктивность](#Продуктивность)
		1. [NR](#NR-61)
			1. [Гуру](#Гуру-3)
			1. [Недостоверная информация](#Недостоверная-информация-10)
	1. [Сила воли](#Сила-воли)
		1. [NR](#NR-62)
			1. [Гуру](#Гуру-4)
			1. [Недостоверная информация](#Недостоверная-информация-11)
	1. [Саморазвитие и нейронауки](#Саморазвитие-и-нейронауки)
		1. [Нейронауки и формирование привычек](#Нейронауки-и-формирование-привычек)
			1. [NR](#NR-63)
				1. [Непрофессионализм](#Непрофессионализм-12)
	1. [Стрессоустойчивость](#Стрессоустойчивость)
		1. [NR](#NR-64)
			1. [Гуру](#Гуру-5)
	1. [Тренировка ума](#Тренировка-ума)
		1. [NR](#NR-65)
			1. [Непрофессионализм](#Непрофессионализм-13)
		1. [Развитие памяти](#Развитие-памяти)
1. [Свобода](#Свобода)
	1. [Бегство от свободы](#Бегство-от-свободы)
	1. [Свобода воли](#Свобода-воли)
		1. [Нейронауки о свободе воли](#Нейронауки-о-свободе-воли)
			1. [Иллюзия свободы воли](#Иллюзия-свободы-воли)
				1. [HC](#HC-11)
	1. [Свобода слова](#Свобода-слова)
		1. [Защита свободы слова](#Защита-свободы-слова)
			1. [Ревизионистский либерализм](#Ревизионистский-либерализм)
		1. [Политкорректность](#Политкорректность)
			1. [NR](#NR-66)
				1. [Недостоверная информация](#Недостоверная-информация-12)
1. [Семья](#Семья)
	1. [Домашнее насилие](#Домашнее-насилие)
		1. [Домашнее насилие над женщинами](#Домашнее-насилие-над-женщинами)
			1. [Неофеминистская критика карцерального феминизма](#Неофеминистская-критика-карцерального-феминизма)
			1. [Подход антиэссенциалистского феминизма к насилию над женщинами](#Подход-антиэссенциалистского-феминизма-к-насилию-над-женщинами)
	1. [Семьи-аккордеоны](#Семьи-аккордеоны)
	1. [Традиционные семейные ценности](#Традиционные-семейные-ценности)
		1. [История противодействия сторонников сохранения семьи безопасности женщин и детей](#История-противодействия-сторонников-сохранения-семьи-безопасности-женщин-и-детей)
			1. [HC](#HC-12)
1. [Сильные мира сего](#Сильные-мира-сего)
	1. [Власть](#Власть)
		1. [Обретение и использование власти](#Обретение-и-использование-власти)
1. [Социальные науки](#Социальные-науки)
	1. [Наука действием](#Наука-действием)
		1. [Исследование действием](#Исследование-действием)
1. [Социология](#Социология)
	1. [Введение в социологию](#Введение-в-социологию)
	1. [Научный инструментарий социолога](#Научный-инструментарий-социолога)
	1. [Опросы общественного мнения](#Опросы-общественного-мнения)
	1. [Софизматика](#Софизматика)
		1. [NR](#NR-67)
			1. [Общественная академия](#Общественная-академия)
		1. [Социальная термодинамика](#Социальная-термодинамика)
			1. [NR](#NR-68)
				1. [Общественная академия](#Общественная-академия-1)
1. [Спорт](#Спорт)
	1. [Нейробиология спортсменов](#Нейробиология-спортсменов)
	1. [Принципы чемпионов](#Принципы-чемпионов)
	1. [Теннисная психология](#Теннисная-психология)
	1. [Тренерская работа](#Тренерская-работа)
1. [Статистика](#Статистика)
	1. [Важнейшие статистические концепции на практике](#Важнейшие-статистические-концепции-на-практике)
	1. [Злоупотребления статистикой](#Злоупотребления-статистикой)
	1. [Польза от правильного обращения со статистикой](#Польза-от-правильного-обращения-со-статистикой)
1. [Успех](#Успех)
	1. [Внутренние установки](#Внутренние-установки)
		1. [HC](#HC-13)
	1. [Успех идей](#Успех-идей)
		1. [NR](#NR-69)
			1. [Истории финансового успеха от первого лица](#Истории-финансового-успеха-от-первого-лица-6)
1. [Утопия](#Утопия)
	1. [Политическая утопия XXI века](#Политическая-утопия-XXI-века)
		1. [NR](#NR-70)
			1. [Непрофессионализм](#Непрофессионализм-14)
1. [Философия](#Философия)
	1. [Вопросы философии](#Вопросы-философии)
		1. [NR](#NR-71)
			1. [Паранаука](#Паранаука-3)
	1. [Западная философия XX века](#Западная-философия-XX-века)
		1. [Направления, понятия и персоналии западной философии XX века](#Направления-понятия-и-персоналии-западной-философии-XX-века)
	1. [Ключевые философские аргументы](#Ключевые-философские-аргументы)
	1. [Лексиконы философских суеверий](#Лексиконы-философских-суеверий)
	1. [Постмодерн](#Постмодерн)
		1. [Паранаучность эстетствующих философов-иррационалистов](#Паранаучность-эстетствующих-философов-иррационалистов)
	1. [Философия повседневных вещей](#Философия-повседневных-вещей)
		1. [NR](#NR-72)
			1. [Психоанализ](#Психоанализ)
	1. [Философские понятия и термины](#Философские-понятия-и-термины)
	1. [Философствование](#Философствование)
1. [Химия](#Химия)
	1. [Химические мифы](#Химические-мифы)
1. [Ценности](#Ценности)
	1. [Смысл жизни](#Смысл-жизни)
		1. [Эмпирические исследования смыслов жизни](#Эмпирические-исследования-смыслов-жизни)
1. [Человек](#Человек)
	1. [Вопрошание](#Вопрошание)
		1. [Насущные вопросы](#Насущные-вопросы)
		1. [Сила вопрошания](#Сила-вопрошания)
			1. [NR](#NR-73)
				1. [НЛП-бэкграунд](#НЛП-бэкграунд)
	1. [Гениальность](#Гениальность)
		1. [Многофакторный анализ гениальности](#Многофакторный-анализ-гениальности)
	1. [Поколения](#Поколения)
		1. [iGen](#iGen)
			1. [NR](#NR-74)
				1. [Недостоверная информация](#Недостоверная-информация-13)
		1. [Миллениалы](#Миллениалы)
			1. [Российские миллениалы](#Российские-миллениалы)
1. [Чтение](#Чтение)
	1. [UseClark](#UseClark)
		1. [NR](#NR-75)
			1. [Непрофессионализм](#Непрофессионализм-15)
	1. [Герменевтическое чтение](#Герменевтическое-чтение)
		1. [Герменевтическое прочтение классических текстов](#Герменевтическое-прочтение-классических-текстов)
	1. [Приёмы рационального чтения](#Приёмы-рационального-чтения)
	1. [Скорочтение](#Скорочтение)
1. [Эволюция](#Эволюция)
	1. [Доказательства эволюции](#Доказательства-эволюции)
1. [Экономика](#Экономика)
	1. [Введение в экономику](#Введение-в-экономику)
	1. [Викиномика](#Викиномика)
		1. [NR](#NR-76)
			1. [Критика](#Критика-3)
	1. [Инклюзивная экономика](#Инклюзивная-экономика)
		1. [Экономика без нищеты, безработицы и загрязнения окружающей среды](#Экономика-без-нищеты-безработицы-и-загрязнения-окружающей-среды)
	1. [Институциональная экономика](#Институциональная-экономика)
		1. [Исходный институционализм](#Исходный-институционализм)
	1. [Интуитивные теории экономики](#Интуитивные-теории-экономики)
		1. [Психология непонимания экономики](#Психология-непонимания-экономики)
		1. [Экономическая иррациональность избирателей](#Экономическая-иррациональность-избирателей)
	1. [Макроэкономическая история](#Макроэкономическая-история)
		1. [Макроэкономическая история Anno Domini](#Макроэкономическая-история-Anno-Domini)
			1. [HC](#HC-14)
	1. [Международные экономические организации](#Международные-экономические-организации)
		1. [Разрушительная политика международных экономических организаций](#Разрушительная-политика-международных-экономических-организаций)
	1. [Поведенческая экономика](#Поведенческая-экономика)
		1. [История поведенческой экономики](#История-поведенческой-экономики)
		1. [Модель обязательств](#Модель-обязательств)
	1. [Повседневная экономика](#Повседневная-экономика)
		1. [Объяснение повседневных вещей мейнстримной экономикой](#Объяснение-повседневных-вещей-мейнстримной-экономикой)
			1. [NR](#NR-77)
				1. [Академический вокизм](#Академический-вокизм-1)
	1. [Практические вопросы различных областей экономики](#Практические-вопросы-различных-областей-экономики)
	1. [Учебные пособия по экономике](#Учебные-пособия-по-экономике)
		1. [Введение в экономику для школьников](#Введение-в-экономику-для-школьников)
		1. [Основы немецкой и российской рыночной экономики](#Основы-немецкой-и-российской-рыночной-экономики)
		1. [Учебники экономикс](#Учебники-экономикс)
	1. [Финансовая грамотность](#Финансовая-грамотность)
		1. [Финансовая грамотность в российских реалиях](#Финансовая-грамотность-в-российских-реалиях)
	1. [Фрикономика](#Фрикономика)
		1. [NR](#NR-78)
			1. [Ненаучные утверждения](#Ненаучные-утверждения-1)
				1. [Левитт Стивен, Дабнер Стивен](#Левитт-Стивен-Дабнер-Стивен)
	1. [Экономика благодарности](#Экономика-благодарности)
		1. [NR](#NR-79)
			1. [Успехмэны](#Успехмэны)
	1. [Экономическая методология](#Экономическая-методология)
		1. [Разговор в среде экономистов](#Разговор-в-среде-экономистов)
	1. [Экономические развитие и рост](#Экономические-развитие-и-рост)
		1. [Институциональное объяснение различий в развитии](#Институциональное-объяснение-различий-в-развитии)
			1. [HC](#HC-15)
		1. [Неолиберальные мифы об экономическом развитии](#Неолиберальные-мифы-об-экономическом-развитии)
		1. [Теории экономического развития](#Теории-экономического-развития)
			1. [HC](#HC-16)
			1. [Альтернативные теории экономического развития](#Альтернативные-теории-экономического-развития)
		1. [Формализация прав собственности в развивающихся странах](#Формализация-прав-собственности-в-развивающихся-странах)
			1. [HC](#HC-17)
		1. [Эмуляция](#Эмуляция)
1. [Этика](#Этика)
	1. [История этики](#История-этики)
	1. [Этические понятия, направления и произведения](#Этические-понятия-направления-и-произведения)
1. [Языки](#Языки)
	1. [Вавилонский синдром](#Вавилонский-синдром)

<!-- /MarkdownTOC -->

<a id="Описание"></a>
# Описание

**Библиотека непрерывного обучения** — соответствующая [целям и критериям «Библиотеки для жизни»](Библиотека-для-жизни#Общая-информация) литература, которую я когда-либо полностью прочитал. Содержит информацию об авторах/редакторах/рецензентах литературы, выдержки из рецензий на неё.

<a id="Рецензии"></a>
# Рецензии

Я стараюсь приводить выдержки из всех напечатанных в реферируемых изданиях рецензий, — как положительных, так и отрицательных, — на книги из «Библиотеки непрерывного обучения». Если какая-то рецензия не упомянута, это означает одно из трёх:

1. я не знаю, как получить к ней доступ;
1. я не подозревал о её существовании;
1. я уже прочитал несколько рецензий на книгу и решил не браться за остальные, поскольку вдумчивое чтение всех имеющихся в наличии рецензий может отнять много времени.

<a id="TODO"></a>
# TODO

1. Информацию о книгах и их авторах, выдержки из рецензий и обоснования помещения той или иной книги в «NR», Вы пока можете почитать [в комментариях на GitHub](https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Kristinita/KristinitaPelican/master/content/Library-for-life/Библиотека-непрерывного-обучения.md). Да, это очень неудобно, и я планирую перенести всю информацию из комментариев непосредственно на эту веб-страницу.

<a id="Альтруизм"></a>
# Альтруизм

<a id="Do-gooders"></a>
## Do-gooders

<a id="Истории-do-gooders"></a>
### Истории do-gooders

<!--- [JOURNALISM_DEGREE] [The New Yorker](https://www.newyorker.com/contributors/larissa-macfarquhar) — «Before joining the magazine, she was a senior editor at Lingua Franca and an advisory editor at The Paris Review, and she wrote for Artforum, The Nation, The New Republic, the Times Book Review, Slate, and other publications. She has received two Front Page Awards from the Newswomen’s Club of New York and the Johnson & Johnson Excellence in Media Award. Her writing has appeared in “The Best American Political Writing” and “The Best American Food Writing.”»

[CRIM_SPEAKER] [TEDMED](https://www.tedmed.com/speakers/show?id=620365)

[CRIM_BIBLIOGRAPHY_END]

[POSITIVE_OR_NEUTRAL_REVIEW][REVIEW_ONE_PAGE] Tom Cooper, Visiting Scholar, Stanford University, [The Journal of American Culture](https://sci-hub.se/10.1111/jacc.12662) — «it is laced with aca-demic references, the moral positions of classical ethi-cists such as Kant and Mill, and the multidisciplinarycitations which exhibit a disciplined mind makinginsightful “across-the-boundaries” connections.», «As such, this is both a secular and “lib-eral” text open to, if not honoring, all reasonableperspectives, moral nuances, and personal choice.», «Although aimed at the educated American public,Strangers Drowningis also an engaging classroom textsince it marries compelling cases to prolonged ethical analysis.», «MacFarquhar may not have pro-vided the complete answer, but she has providedimportant questions worth pondering in far greaterdepth—questions which matter and which have practi-cal implications of consequence.»

Robert Mark Simpson, lecturer in the philosophy department at Monash University, where he also teaches in the human rights program, [The New Rambler Review](https://newramblerreview.com/book-reviews/philosophy/moral-renegades) — «Larissa MacFarquhar’s Strangers Drowning is less interested in advising its readers on how to do good, and more interested in examining the choices others have made in seeking to do as much good as they can.», «Across three chapters she deftly dissects the allegations and analyses that other writers have used to disparage the do-gooder. These chapters make the book something much more than a journalistic compendium of fascinating tales.», «Within fifteen pages, nods are made to Mandeville, Kant, Smith, Robespierre, Darwin, Comte, Nietzsche, and Freud. The findings are inconclusive, but it finishes well, with an amusing swipe at second-rate psychoanalysis.», «The second chapter is narrower in focus, and better for it. In the third of these critical chapters, exploring the derogation of altruism in literature, MacFarquhar is on song.»

Jeffrey Flynn, [Humanity: An International Journal of Human Rights, Humanitarianism,and Development](https://sci-hub.se/10.1353/hum.2019.0010) — «eople with this single-mindedness are the focus of Larissa MacFarquhar’s wonderful book Strangers Drowning.», «MacFarquhar concludes this discussion with David Rieff’sABed for the Night, which she uses to suggest that—despite the fact that humanitari-anism often takes the form of a new mode of controlling targeted populations, andalthough they are often condescending hypocrites—humanitarians are still “the bestof us” (166–68). This is a rather unsatisfying conclusion to this section of MacFar-quhar’s otherwise brilliant book.»

Ronald B. J. Tinnevelt, Radboud University, [Ethical Perspectives](http://www.ethics.be/ethics/viewpic.php?LAN=E&TABLE=EP&ID=2323#page=25) — «MacFarquhar’s book gives us a very interesting, eloquently written but sometimes uneven account of the lives and choices of the kind of zealous do-gooder “who makes people uneasy” (3); people who devote their entire life to helping strangers.»

Fernanda Belo Gontijo, [Crítica](https://criticanarede.com/etic_filmoral.html) — «Com um estilo claro, a autora nos descreve em quinze capítulos as desafiadoras histórias de vários benfeitores, intercalando-as com reflexões sobre os quase incansáveis sentidos de dever e de imparcialidade para com quem sofre e a desconfiança em torno de sua conduta generosa.», «Um dos méritos do livro de MacFarquhar consiste justamente em mostrar a face perturbadoramente humana dos benfeitores. Ela não mostra apenas as vicissitudes, mas também as faltas de vários deles»

[BOOK_OR_AUTHOR_OR_CONCEPT_CRITICISM][REVIEW_SAYS_LITTLE] Peter Heinegg, [CrossCurrents](https://sci-hub.se/10.1111/CROS.12193) — «The accounts MacFarquhar gives of today’s apprentice or full-time saints(why not call them that?) are powerful, colorful, and intriguing, but when itcomes to analyzing and understanding their vision, she fails almost completely. For starters, she insists on calling them “do-gooders,” as if she could not hear the contempt the term hasalways conveyed (like the other smug conservative put-down, “bleedingheart”).», «MacFarquhar just does not have acoherent historical, philosophical, ortheological framework to deal with the“problem”of altruism. (She never evenraises the commonsensical question ofwhether radical altruists make peoplefeel uncomfortable simply because theyremind us what slackers we are.) In abook with no footnotes, page refer-ences, or index, she tosses in sloppy, impressionistic summaries of thinkers like Nietzsche, Freud, and, above all,Peter Singer, whose position she consis-tently distorts. She sees Nietzsche ashostile to every kind of selflessness,ignoring the fact that his master moral-ity leaves plenty of room for generous giving», «She writes Singer off (without ever quoting him) as a fanatical zealot, but does not mention his key principle of marginal utility», «Many of MacFarquahr’s “do-good-ers,” as mentioned, began their careerswith some sort of religious motivation,but she has little to say about the linkbetween religion and altruism», «MacFarquhar, like Orwell, has littleuse for saintly“do-gooders,”who can atworst really get on your nerves, butconsider the alternative: the evil-doersand the do-nothings.», «MacFarquhar claims thatfor Freud, selflessness was“usually sus-pect.”But Freud’s negative assessmentof humanity was not all that far fromSt. Paul’s or Augustine’s.», «So, the more“do-gooders,”the bet-ter. Focusing on a few “impossible ide-alists” inevitably obscures the ratherlarge staff of extraordinary helpers andservers, the volunteers and overseas workers, the members of NGOs likeOxfam and Doctors Without Borders,all of whom spend their time doingjobs thatl’homme moyen sensuelwouldnot dream of taking on.», «The final flaw—and a major one—inStrangers Drowningis its blinking onecrucial feature of the contemporary ethi-cal scene: the ecological crisis nowengulfing the earth.», «This situation calls for more thanMacFarquhar’s complacent embrace of“imperfection.”Though she eventuallyhas to confess that“do-gooders”some-times actually do good, and a lot moregood than the legions of couch pota-toes, she cannot resist taking cheap shots at them.»

[REVIEW_IN_MEDIA] Samuel Moyn, [The Nation](https://www.thenation.com/article/archive/the-beauty-and-the-costs-of-extreme-altruism/) — «But she is especially taken with one criticism of extreme altruism, and skirts another almost entirely.», «By concentrating mainly on contemporary moral philosophers who know little, and care less, about politics and institutions, MacFarquhar skirts the fact that the institutional problem has become the essential one across the board, as outstanding recent books about humanitarianism by Alex de Waal and Jennifer Rubenstein argue.», «But aside from a few pages on foreign aid, she doesn’t explore the implications of her passing comment that many observers have concluded along the way “that organized politics was a more effective vehicle for human progress than the full hearts of the leisured bourgeois.”», «MacFarquhar is thrown back in her brilliant book on the alternatives of everyday versus extreme personal morality.»

[N/JMass]

[ADDITIONAL_READING] Susan Wolf — «Moral Saints»

Flanagan, Owen J — «Varieties of moral personality: ethics and psychological realism»

Andrew Michael Flescher — «Heroes, Saints, and Ordinary Morality»

Scott T. Allison, George R. Goethals, Roderick Moreland Kramer — «Handbook of Heroism and Heroic Leadership»

Tony Vaux — «The Selfish Altruist: Relief Work in Famine and War»

Rubenstein, Jennifer C. — «Between Samaritans and States: The Political Ethics of Humanitarian INGOs»

Chiara Lepora, Robert E. Goodin — «On Complicity and Compromise»

Lilie Chouliaraki — «The Ironic Spectator: Solidarity in the Age of Post-Humanitarianism»

Peter Unger — «Living High and Letting Die: Our Illusion of Innocence»

Alex de Waal — «Advocacy in Conflict: Critical Perspectives on Transnational Activism»

Shelly Kagan — «The Limits of Morality»

[NO_PDF][NO_SCEDRECO] -->
1. MacFarquhar Larissa — Strangers Drowning꞉ Grappling with Impossible Idealism, Drastic Choices, and the Overpowering Urge to Help (Penguin Press, 2015).pdf

<a id="Сострадание"></a>
## Сострадание

<!--- [Kr/MCol][N/MCol]

[ACADEMIC_DEGREE_EDITORS] James R. Doty, [Stanford Medicine, The Center for Compassion And Altruism Research And Education](http://ccare.stanford.edu/about/people/ccare-staff/) — «MD, is a clinical professor in the Department of Neurosurgery at Stanford University School of Medicine

Seppälä, [Stanford Medicine, The Center for Compassion And Altruism Research And Education](http://ccare.stanford.edu/about/people/ccare-staff/) — «PhD, Science Director of the Center for Compassion and Altruism Research and Education at Stanford University. Her areas of research include positive organizational psychology, health psychology, and cultural psychology», «PhD in Psychology from Stanford University. She completed her postdoctoral studies at the University of Wisconsin-Madison with Dr. Richard Davidson.»

Worline, [Stanford Medicine, The Center for Compassion And Altruism Research And Education](http://ccare.stanford.edu/about/people/ccare-staff/) — «PhD, is an organizational psychologist and founder and CEO of EnlivenWork

Simon-Thomas, [Berkeley, Greater Good Science Center](https://greatergood.berkeley.edu/profile/emiliana_simon_thomas) — «Ph.D., the science director of the Greater Good Science Center», «She earned her doctorate in Cognition Brain and Behavior at UC Berkeley, where her dissertation used behavioral and neuroscience methods to examine how negative states like fear and aversion influence thinking and decision-making. During her postdoc, Emiliana transitioned to studying pro-social states like love of humanity, compassion, and awe.»

Brown, [Stony Brook University, Renaissance School of Medicine](https://renaissance.stonybrookmedicine.edu/psychiatry/faculty/brown_s) — «PhD in Social Psychology, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, 1999; Postdoctoral Fellow, Survey Research Center, University of Michigan, 2001»

Cameron, [University of Iowa, CV](https://psychology.uiowa.edu/sites/psychology.uiowa.edu/files/field/cv/CameronCV_1.pdf) — «2007—2013 Ph.D., Social Psychology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC With Formal Concentration in Quantitative Psychology»; [PennState, Rock Ethics Institute](https://rockethics.psu.edu/people/c-daryl-cameron/) — «Cameron’s research and teaching focus on the psychological processes involved in empathy and moral decision-making. Much of his work examines motivational factors that shape empathic emotions and behaviors toward others. For instance, Cameron has examined why people exhibit more empathy for the suffering of single identifiable victims (e.g., Cecil the Lion) than for large numbers of victims (as in natural disasters, epidemics, and genocides).»

[ACADEMIC_DEGREE] C. Daniel Batson, [Personal site, CV](http://batson.socialpsychology.org/cv/Batson.doc) — «Princeton Theological Seminary   	1964-1970, Two degrees in religious education; Ph.D., Princeton Theological Seminary, 1971»; «Princeton University, 1970-1972, Department of Psychology, Concentration in Social Psychology; Ph.D., Princeton University, 1972

[PROFESSIONAL_DEGREE] Kathleen Regan Figley, [Figley Institute, CV](http://www.figleyinstitute.com/documents/Resume2009March.pdf) — «State Human Services Officer/area Coordinator; Disaster Assistance Employee, Education And Training Specialist & Disaster Response Team Member; Adjunct Faculty Traumatology Institute, Florida State University; Adjunct Professor Tulane University, School of Social Work»

[PROFESSIONAL_DEGREE] Yotam Heineberg, [Stanford Medicine, The Center for Compassion And Altruism Research And Education](http://ccare.stanford.edu/people/yotam-heineberg-psyd/) — «PsyD, clinical supervisor for therapists in training and lecturer for Palo Alto University»

[PROFESSIONAL_DEGREE] Brandon G. King, [ResearchGate publications](https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Brandon-King-12). Я не нашёл сведений о наличий у него учёной степени.

[STUDENT_INFO] Jake P. Moskowitz, [Noba](https://nobaproject.com/authors/jake-p-moskowitz) — «current doctoral student in the Psychology & Social Behavior program at the University of California, Irvine»

[ACADEMIC_DEGREE][CRIM_THEOLOGY] Lobsang Tenzin Negi (legal name Satya Dev Negi) — Emory College of Arts and Sciences, [Department of Religion](http://religion.emory.edu/home/people/faculty/negi-lobsang.html) — «Ph.D. is the co-founder and Executive Director of the Center for Contemplative Science and Compassion-Based Ethics at Emory University, formerly the Emory-Tibet Partnership. Prof. Negi is also a Professor of Pedagogy in Emory University’s Department of Religion and the founder and spiritual director of Drepung Loseling Monastery, Inc.», «Prof. Negi completed his Ph.D. at Emory University in 1999; his interdisciplinary dissertation centered on traditional Buddhist and contemporary Western approaches to emotions and their impact on wellness. His current research focuses on the complementarity of modern science and contemplative practice.»

[PROFESSIONAL_DEGREE] Charles Louis Raison, [University of Wisconsin-Madison, CV](https://kb.wisc.edu/images/group402/105849/Raison-Charles-CV.pdf) — «Medical: 1987-91 Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, M.D. degree»; «Professor, Department of Human Development and Family Studies, School of Human Ecology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI»

[STUDENT_INFO] Sue Shea, [Research Centre for Transcultural Studies in Health](https://cultureandcompassion.com/about-the-centre/collaborating-institutions/sue-shea) — «BSc (Hons) Psychology, PG Cert Humanities, 3 years study at PhD Level»

[STUDENT_INFO] Alea Skwara, [Google Scholar](https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=msHWDgUAAAAJ) — «PhD Candidate»

[PROFESSIONAL_DEGREE] Sasha Zarins, [CASE](https://www.case.org/sasha-zarins) — «Sasha Zarins joined the Indiana University Lilly Family School of Philanthropy at IUPUI as a research associate in September 2014, and has been with the Research Department as a project coordinator since February 2017. Zarins earned her undergraduate and master's degrees in psychology from the University of Michigan.»

Остальные авторы книги имеют PhD

[CRIM_SPEAKER] Doty, [AAE Speakers](https://www.aaespeakers.com/keynote-speakers/james-r-doty-md)

Seppälä, [personal site](https://emmaseppala.com/tedx-2/)

Worline, [personal site](http://monicaworline.com/speaking/)

Simon-Thomas, [edX](https://www.edx.org/bio/emiliana-simon-thomas)

[CRIM_THEOLOGY] Batson, [personal site](http://batson.socialpsychology.org/cv/Batson.doc)

[CRIM_THEOLOGY] Kathleen Regan Figley, [Figley Institute, CV](http://www.figleyinstitute.com/documents/Resume2009March.pdf) — «Graduate Theological Foundation, South Bend, Indiana, Doctor Of Ministry, Pastoral Counseling, 2008»

[REVIEW_CHECK] 2021-8-15

[EDITORS_PROJECTS] [The Center for Compassion And Altruism Research And Education](http://ccare.stanford.edu/)

[Greater Good Science Center](https://greatergood.berkeley.edu/) — «The Greater Good Science Center studies the psychology, sociology, and neuroscience of well-being, and teaches skills that foster a thriving, resilient, and compassionate society.»
 -->
1. Seppälä Emma M., Simon-Thomas Emiliana, Brown Stephanie L., Worline Monica C., Cameron C. Daryl, Doty James R. (eds.) — The Oxford Handbook of Compassion Science (Oxford University Press, 2017).pdf

<a id="Социальное-предпринимательство"></a>
## Социальное предпринимательство

<a id="Истории-социальных-предпринимателей"></a>
### Истории социальных предпринимателей

<a id="NR"></a>
#### NR

<a id="Истории-финансового-успеха-от-первого-лица"></a>
##### Истории финансового успеха от первого лица

<!--- [JOURNALISM_DEGREE] [Персональный сайт](https://davidbornstein.wordpress.com/home/) — «He has been a journalist for 26 years and currently co-authors the Fixes column in The New York Times.»

[AUTHOR_PROJECT] [Solutions Journalism Network](https://www.solutionsjournalism.org/). Борнштейн — представитель «[журналистики решений](https://ijnet.org/ru/story/%D0%B6%D1%83%D1%80%D0%BD%D0%B0%D0%BB%D0%B8%D1%81%D1%82%D0%B8%D0%BA%D0%B0-%D1%80%D0%B5%D1%88%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B9-%D1%81-%D1%87%D0%B5%D0%B3%D0%BE-%D0%BD%D0%B0%D1%87%D0%B0%D1%82%D1%8C-%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%B1%D0%BE%D1%82%D1%83)».

[BOOK_SUPPORT] Фонд региональных социальных программ «Наше будущее», компания «Берингер Ингельхайм»

[CRIM_SPEAKER] [Собственный сайт](https://davidbornstein.wordpress.com/contact/)

[Ad/SPR]

[AD_EXPLANATION] Все герои книги рассматриваются с позитивной точки зрения, многие характеристики даны от них самих. Однако возможна другая точка зрения на их деятельность, см. критику «Мира трёх нулей» Юнуса.

[REVIEW_NO_ACCESS] John T. Landry, [Harvard Business review](https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=791753)

Susan E. Clarke, [Children, Youth and Environments](https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7721/chilyoutenvi.15.2.0401)

[ADDITIONAL_READING] Хокен Пол — «Я начинаю своё дело» (позднее выпущена под названием «Дело вашей жизни: как реализовать мечту, создав свой бизнес»)

C. Daniel Batson — «The Altruism Question. Toward a Social-Psychological Answer»

Norretranders, Tor — «The Generous Man: How Helping Others is the Sexiest Thing You Can Do»

Michela Betta — «Ethicmentality — Ethics in Capitalist Economy, Business, and Society»

Paul Hawken — «Blessed Unrest: How the Largest Social Movement in History Is Restoring Grace, Justice, and Beauty to the World»

Petra Jähnke, Gabriela B. Christmann, Karsten Balgar (Hrsg.) — «Social Entrepreneurship. Perspektiven für die Raumentwicklung»

[POSITIVE_OR_NEUTRAL_REVIEW] Prof. Dr. Hans Langnickel Hochschule Lausitz Standort Cottbus, [Socialnet](https://www.socialnet.de/rezensionen/3475.php) — «David Bornstein liefert beeindruckende Menschenportraits, die so gar nicht in Übereinstimmung zu bringen sind mit unserem Bild von Sozialmanagern. Es sind aber eben auch keine Manager, die er portraitiert, sondern Sozialunternehmer.», «Dieses Buch ist uneingeschränkt zu empfehlen, weil es die Perspektive berufs-, organisationsoder deutschlandzentriert erweitern hilft.»

[NO_SCEDRECO] -->
1. Борнштейн Дэвид — Как изменить мир. Социальное предпринимательство и сила новых идей (Альпина, 2012).pdf

<a id="Эффективный-альтруизм"></a>
## Эффективный альтруизм

<a id="Принципы-эффективного-альтруизма"></a>
### Принципы эффективного альтруизма

<!--- [ACADEMIC_DEGREE] DPhil, [University of Oxford, CV](https://oxford.academia.edu/WilliamMacAskill/CurriculumVitae) — «2010 — April 2014, D.Phil., University of Oxford. Title: Normative Uncertainty. Areas: AOS Ethics, AOC Political Philosophy, Decision Theory, Philosophy and Economics»

[AUTHOR_PROJECT] [Centre for Effective Altruism](https://www.centreforeffectivealtruism.org/)

[GiveWell](https://www.givewell.org/) — charity reviews and research

[Giving What We Can](https://www.givingwhatwecan.org/) — “Give more. Give more effectively”

[80000 hours](https://80000hours.org/) — provides advice on how to make a difference career

[CRIM_SPEAKER] [TED](https://www.ted.com/speakers/will_macaskill)

[Is/Mass]

[POSITIVE_OR_NEUTRAL_REVIEW][REVIEW_RETELLING] — Leonard Kahn and Emily Ortiz, Loyola University, [Philosophy in Review](https://journals.uvic.ca/index.php/pir/article/download/19096/8396) — «Will MacAskill’sDoing Good Better provides an introduction to the Effective Altruism movement, and, in the process, it makes a strong case for its importance.», «Second, MacAskill is skeptical about encouraging people to work for charitable organizations, pointing out, as many Effective Altruists do, that many of us can do more good by seeking a high-income profession and ‘earning to give’ or, in some cases, by going into policy or politics in order to make governments more altruistic. Much ink has been spilled on this subject, and we doubt that either MacAskill or his critics have had the final word on the matter yet.», «We have already seen MacAskill relying on a somewhat suspect metric when comparing benefits to humans, but trying to find a metric broad enough to allow meaningful com-parisons across species raises further doubts.», «We have already seen MacAskill relying on a somewhat suspect metric when comparing benefits to humans, but trying to find a metric broad enough to allow meaningful com-parisons across species raises further doubts. If we don’t have a proper metric for this purpose, then how do we know whether we’re doing good better when we shift our resources away from, on the one hand, supplementing the diets of children in low-income countries with vitamin A to help prevent blindness toward, on the other hand, funding online efforts to persuade people in high-income coun-tries to eat less meat? Of course, MacAskill’s book is not an attempt to answer this question, but we think Effective Altruists would be well advised to work on such an answer.», «Critics of Effective Altruism will be inclined to argue that we have no special obligations to those who are alive today, and it is hard not to feel the pull of this conclusion.», «Effective Altruists are right to warn us that their critics might be suffering from a failure of imagination.»

[REVIEW_ONE_PAGE] Eamon Aloyo, [Global Governance: A Review of Multilateralism and International Organizations](https://sci-hub.se/10.1163/19426720-02302012) — «Various scholars such as Jennifer Rubenstein and Angus Deatonhave criticized Effective Altruism for not being adequately attuned to insti-tutional features of severe poverty, injustice, and the potential of political movements to do more good than bed nets or cash transfers», «Aimed at a popular audience, MacAskill’s book would be useful in an undergraduate course on international ethics or international development and for anyone interested in thinking about how to do good most effectively.»

Robert Mark Simpson, lecturer in the philosophy department at Monash University, where he also teaches in the human rights program, [The New Rambler Review](https://newramblerreview.com/book-reviews/philosophy/moral-renegades) — «But there are grounds for doubt here about whether – if we accept what the climate scientists say: that ecological catastrophe is nigh – the promise of progress via mass industrialization can anchor any sound moral argument. And a more comprehensive engagement with the elementary Leftist objection – that global capitalism’s rising tide ultimately sinks more boats than it lifts – would have been valuable.», «Also, while it’s a less weighty issue, it’s surprising that MacAskill has such qualms about consumer activism. His usual instinct is to credit efforts to do good that others discount. So instead of speculation about why consumer activists may become averse to heftier moral demands (DGB: 180), one would have hoped for a more ‘blue-skies’ inquiry into emerging modes of consumer activism that have the potential to bring about major benefits in the future.», «Today’s young idea entrepreneurs like to say they’re trying to start a conversation about the ideas they’re pitching. Unlike many who parrot that line, MacAskill and company have undoubtedly succeeded in setting off a conversation.», «But in the end it’s hard to assess MacAskill’s book in the same way it’s hard to assess any work trying to popularise a movement. In short, its merits cannot be judged independently of the movement it champions. There are important critiques of Effective Altruism – for instance, that it’s not equipped to deal with the structural political causes of the suffering it opposes, and that it misconstrues what the ethical life is really about – which are largely set aside, rather than tackled, in Doing Good Better. But even if adequate replies to these criticisms can be given, their inclusion wouldn’t necessarily make for an effective primer to the EA movement. And ultimately that’s what MacAskill’s book is, even it doesn’t speak to all of the subterranean sources of angst about the movement.»

Lidwien Sol, PhD candidate in philanthropy and sustainable finance at Maastricht University; Kellie Liket, post doctoral researcher at Erasmus University Rotterdam, [Alliance Magazine](https://www.alliancemagazine.org/book-review/doing-good-better-how-effective-altruism-can-help-you-make-a-difference-william-macaskill/) — «In a way, the book paints a somewhat simplistic view where our capitalistic world is taken as a status quo. MacAskill doesn’t dwell too much on the causes and dynamics underlying the challenges our world is facing today. This falls in line with the effective altruists’ approach. Rather than trying to change the drivers of power in today’s world, effective altruists attempt to achieve as much positive impact as possible within the limits of the system.», «Another challenging concept of effective altruism is that it separates our donations from the way we earn the money and the lives we live. That is effective altruism at its core: it does not ask us to donate all our money to charity, it simply asks us to reflect on our donating behaviour and redirect donations towards effective charities and causes.», «Doing Good Better is much more than just a guidance book for over-privileged recent graduates. It touches upon every aspect of our lives – career, donations and volunteering – and is a must-read for anyone wanting to do good. For drifters, for do-gooders, for corporate bankers or retirees – this book will have everyone turning its pages and leaves you feeling empowered.»

Dipl.-Päd. Dr. Jos Schnurer, Ehemaliger Lehrbeauftragter an der Universität Hildesheim, [Socialnet](https://www.socialnet.de/rezensionen/20648.php) — «Die indisch-britische Philosophin Amia Srinivasan, gleich jung (28) wie MacAskill, sieht im effektiven Altruismus „Wohlfühldenken von Individualisten“. Es fehle der Theorie eine grundlegende Auseinandersetzung mit den Institutionen, den nationalen und egoistischen, lokalen und globalen staatlichen Strukturen und Normvorstellungen, um die Ursachen der Ungerechtigkeiten und Ungleichheiten beseitigen und einen makroökonomischen und -gesellschaftlichen Perspektivenwechsel vollziehen zu können.», «Ich vermute, dass William MacAskill darauf antworten würde: Wir effektiven Altruisten wollen keine rigorosen Fingerzeige und beanspruchen auch nicht, das Rezept zur Rettung der Welt parat zu haben. Wenn es gelänge, hoffend, spielerisch und effektiv viele Menschen dazu zu bringen, materiell und ideell Gutes besser zu tun, wäre viel für mehr Gerechtigkeit und Friedlichkeit in der Welt erreicht.»

Ronald B. J. Tinnevelt, Radboud University, [Ethical Perspectives](http://www.ethics.be/ethics/viewpic.php?LAN=E&TABLE=EP&ID=2323#page=25) — «Criminal justice reform, for example, can take many different shapes and forms depending on our view of the end goals of the criminal justice system as such. So different values can come into play. Moreover, it is not even clear why QALY’s or expected value should be the main criteria for comparing charities. Some critics argue that there is no reason why other values could not also be incorporated. Value judgments are unavoidable and will lead to reasonable disagreements; no doubt also among the proponents of EA.», «We need moral saints, but we cannot all be saints. Moral saintliness is not a general model for personal wellbeing.»

[REVIEW_PERSONAL_COMMENTS] В рецензии Тинневелта не понял, где посылки для вывода «We need moral saints, but we cannot all be saints. Moral saintliness is not a general model for personal wellbeing.»

[BOOK_OR_AUTHOR_OR_CONCEPT_CRITICISM][REVIEW_SMASHER] Rupert Read, [University of East Anglia](https://people.uea.ac.uk/r_read), [Radical Philosophy](https://www.radicalphilosophy.com/reviews/individual-reviews/must-do-better) — «While it is possible to deeply admire many of the motivations behind the movement, and recognise that well-targeted individual giving can certainly have demonstrable positive effects, EA falls far short of offering a solution to global poverty, let alone to still-bigger questions of global politics and ecology — or to questions of how to choose to live; that is, the true questions of ethics. In its quest for quantification, EA tends to overlook key, foundational areas of concern – perhaps most notably dangerous anthropogenic climate change – and fails to appreciate the fundamental role of global political-economy in the issues it seeks to address.», «Of ‘2-4 degrees of climate change’, he writes that its scale as a problem is ‘fairly large’; the same level of scale he assigns to the issue of ‘US criminal justice reform’. This is a catastrophic under-estimation. Four degrees of climate change would mean the end of the world as we know it», «The key methodological flaw here, and one that is common to much of EA, is the elision of ‘effectiveness’ with ‘evidence-based’. It makes the EA methodology little better than the infamous drunk looking for his car keys where the streetlight happens to be shining. Lack of certainty should not be a reason to delay strong precautious action in the face of potential catastrophe; but EA cannot take the precautionary principle seriously, because of the dogmatic insistence upon evidence.», «Focusing largely on health in the way that most EA does (a focus explicitly defended in MacAskill’s book) is also hopelessly short-sighted; catastrophically so. EA largely occludes the systemic threats bearing down on us in favour of more visibly ‘effective’ interventions ultimately conceived of as interventions by individuals to help individuals. Consequently, EA tends to boil down largely to relatively short-term / manageable projects.», «Activities with long-term consequences tend to be eschewed in favour of such short-term projects. Failing to award climate change the premier global threat status it deserves, on the grounds of its being calculus-unfriendly, represents a grave discrimination against future generations.», «Dealing only with extreme poverty as it exists now boils down to storing up a constant stream of emergent destitution into the future, rather than tackling its root causes. If philanthropy is solely focused on the most egregious manifestation of symptoms, then the underlying causes are allowed to fester and intensify. EA’s fixation on the symptoms creates the impression that they arise spontaneously, and are not reflective of structural problems of the neoliberal socio-economic imaginary.», «Perhaps the most crucial political lack in EA is its tendency not to question the overarching political-economic frame of (neo)liberal capitalist individualism.», «Similarly, consider MacAskill’s extraordinary support for the unbelievable level of inequality involved in what we allow to accrue to entrepreneurs», «The conventionality of MacAskill’s economics is matched by the conventionality of his admiration for ‘conventional’ (sic) agriculture – that is, for industrialised agriculture dependent on pesticides, artificial fertilisers etc.; agriculture that is leading towards a situation in which we have only about two generations worth of soil left.», «MacAskill attacks the movement for local food, and issues ill-informed calls to substitute foreign-grown tomatoes for home-grown ones, ignoring the possibility of a system-change which would, for instance, once more re-centre our food-production on what is seasonably growable, where we live.», «If this perhaps allows us to understand better why it is impossible for the likes of MacAskill to get the threat and causes of human-induced dangerous climate-change into focus, it also makes it easier to understand how he can make the extraordinary claim that sweatshops are the most humane form of employment for many people in the ‘3rd world’.», «The idea that people in ‘developing countries’ might conceivably have been sold a false prospectus about what life in cities is like – or real alternative possibilities such as a Gandhian culture of self-reliance, or outright political revolution – is simply not considered.», «And for comparing the effectiveness of a few commensurable charities, EA is, as I have said, of use. Yet there needs to be far more thinking here on the relationship between effective altruism and effective democracy.», «I am not encouraged by MacAskill’s warm words for those looking into this. At the very least, it is alarming that MacAskill seems almost to pass over what is by far the most vital element of the climate issue – namely, cutting down on our GHG-pollution of the atmosphere – in favour of carbon offsets on the one hand and reckless technophiliac enthusiasm for geo-engineering on the other. Doing good better? I think that philosophy can help us do much better than this.»

[REVIEW_LONG] Amia Srinivasan, Chichele Professor of Social and Political Theory at Oxford, [London Review of Books](https://www.lrb.co.uk/the-paper/v37/n18/amia-srinivasan/stop-the-robot-apocalypse) — «These numbers are based on self-reporting by Aids patients and blind people, which raises some obvious worries. For example, dialysis patients rate their lives at 0.56 Qalys – significantly higher than the 0.39 Qalys predicted by people who don’t need dialysis.», «But don’t many lucrative careers have bad social effects? Up until recently MacAskill argued that such effects were morally irrelevant, again by counterfactual reasoning.», «More recently MacAskill and his team at 80,000 Hours have backed away from this ‘replaceability thesis’, conceding that it’s harder than they initially thought to evaluate the counterfactuals. For example, there’s good economic reason to think that going into banking really does increase the total number of bankers, and doesn’t simply change who does the banking.», «Doing Good Better is a feel-good guide to getting good done. It doesn’t dwell much on the horrors of global inequality, and sidesteps any diagnosis of its causes. The word ‘oppression’ appears just once. This is surely by design, at least in part.», «But the book’s snappy style isn’t just a strategic choice. MacAskill is evidently comfortable with ways of talking that are familiar from the exponents of global capitalism», «That he speaks in the proprietary language of the illness – global inequality – whose symptoms he proposes to mop up is an irony on which he doesn’t comment. Perhaps he senses that his potential followers – privileged, ambitious millennials – don’t want to hear about the iniquities of the system that has shaped their worldview.», «Yet there is no principled reason why effective altruists should endorse the worldview of the benevolent capitalist. Since effective altruism is committed to whatever would maximise the social good, it might for example turn out to support anti-capitalist revolution.», «What’s the expected marginal value of becoming an anti-capitalist revolutionary? To answer that you’d need to put a value and probability measure on achieving an unrecognisably different world – even, perhaps, on our becoming unrecognisably different sorts of people. It’s hard enough to quantify the value of a philanthropic intervention: how would we go about quantifying the consequences of radically reorganising society?», «MacAskill seems to think there is no moral calculation that can’t be made to fit on the back of his envelope; any uncertainty we might have about precise values or probabilities can be priced into the model. (His doctoral dissertation was on the modelling of moral uncertainty.) But the more uncertain the figures, the less useful the calculation, and the more we end up relying on a commonsense understanding of what’s worth doing.», «The more complex the problem effective altruism tries to address – that is, the more deeply it engages with the world as a political entity – the less distinctive its contribution becomes.», «But effective altruism, so far at least, has been a conservative movement, calling us back to where we already are: the world as it is, our institutions as they are. MacAskill does not address the deep sources of global misery – international trade and finance, debt, nationalism, imperialism, racial and gender-based subordination, war, environmental degradation, corruption, exploitation of labour – or the forces that ensure its reproduction. Effective altruism doesn’t try to understand how power works, except to better align itself with it. In this sense it leaves everything just as it is. This is no doubt comforting to those who enjoy the status quo – and may in part account for the movement’s success.», «There is a small paradox in the growth of effective altruism as a movement when it is so profoundly individualistic. Its utilitarian calculations presuppose that everyone else will continue to conduct business as usual; the world is a given, in which one can make careful, piecemeal interventions. The tacit assumption is that the individual, not the community, class or state, is the proper object of moral theorising.», «You wouldn’t be blamed for hoping that philosophy has more to give.»

[REVIEW_LETTER] Rajith Dissanayake, Birkbeck, University of London — «William MacAskill and his followers, about whom Amia Srinivasan writes, believe that buying insecticide-coated malarial nets for Africa is an effective bit of altruism (LRB, 24 September). As noted in a report in the New York Times, these nets are modified and used for fishing in lakes such as Lake Tanganyika. The modified nets catch everything, leaving little breeding stock for future generations. Unintended consequences of long-distance do-gooding?»

[REVIEW_LETTER] Yannis Gourtsoyannis, London WC1 — «As a doctor with experience in international health I have found that some of the claims made by the proponents of effective altruism are not merely ‘satisfyingly counterintuitive’: they are wrong.», «For example, MacAskill claims that deworming has better educational outcomes among Kenyan schoolchildren than increasing the number of textbooks or teachers. This notion is based almost entirely on a single study published by Miguel and Kremer in the journal Econometrica in 2004 and has recently been debunked by Aiken, Davey et al in the International Journal of Epidemiology. Deworming does not improve educational outcomes.», «A review of the evidence available in the field of development studies makes it clear that improved educational outcomes in developing countries are best achieved by, wait for it, a decent, well-resourced school system. The idea that a single anti-worm pill is the key to solving the deep societal injustice of poor education is another instance of the glib ‘freakonomics’ style of thinking that has hijacked much of the field of social studies.»

[REVIEW_LETTERS_ANSWER] William MacAskill — «A comprehensive survey published last year in the Malaria Journal found that the overwhelming majority of nets were used for malaria prevention, while fewer than 1 per cent were used for other purposes.», «It’s true that Aiken et al’s recent replication found some coding errors in Miguel and Kremer’s original study, but Gourtsoyannis’s claim that this study has been ‘debunked’ is inaccurate and misleading. Inaccurate in that the errors identified by Aiken et al do not directly challenge the existence of an effect on school attendance: rather, they challenge the effects on untreated students attending schools within a certain range (between 3 and 6 km). And misleading because the case for deworming programmes doesn’t primarily rest on its effects on school attendance: ultimately it is the remarkable impact that these programmes have on earnings later in life that makes deworming an unusually cost-effective intervention.»

[BOOK_SUPPORT] Благотворительный фонд «Друзья»

[ADDITIONAL_READING] Rob Reich — «Just Giving: Why Philanthropy Is Failing Democracy and How It Can Do Better»

Michael Edwards — «Small Change: Why Business Won't Save the World»

Michael Edwards — «Just Another Emperor?: The Myths and Realities of Philanthrocapitalism»

Michael Edwards — «The Love That Does Justice: Spiritual Activism in Dialogue With Social Science»

John Certalic — «Them: The Richer Life Found in Caring for Others»

Christopher J. Coyne — «Doing Bad by Doing Good»

William MacAskill, Krister Bykvist, Toby Ord — «Moral Uncertainty»

Singer Peter — «The Most Good You Can Do: How Effective Altruism Is Changing Ideas About Living Ethically»

Andy Fisher — «The Hero Forge»

Richard G. Wilkinson, Kate Pickett — «The spirit level: why greater equality makes societies stronger»

Stijn Bruers — «Beter worden in goed doen»

Элинор Остром — «Управляя общим: эволюция институтов коллективной деятельности»

[NO_PDF][NO_SCEDRECO] -->
1. Макаскилл Уильям — Ум во благо. От добрых намерений — к эффективному альтруизму (АСТ, Corpus, 2018).epub

<a id="Аргументация-и-логика"></a>
# Аргументация и логика

<a id="Аргументация"></a>
## Аргументация

<a id="Практическая-аргументация"></a>
### Практическая аргументация

<a id="NR-1"></a>
#### NR

<a id="Успехмэн"></a>
##### Успехмэн

<!--- [Непряхин Никита Юрьевич](https://www.forbes.ru/person/73476-nepryahin-nikita)

[NOTE] Бизнес-тренер, но о его научных достижениях я ничего не нашёл. -->
1. Непряхин Никита Юрьевич — Убеждай и побеждай. Секреты эффективной аргументации (Альпина Паблишер, 2012).pdf

<a id="Своды-правил-практической-аргументации"></a>
#### Своды правил практической аргументации

<!--- [Уэстон Энтони](https://www.elon.edu/u/directory/profile/?user=weston)

[NO_SOURCES] -->
1. Уэстон Энтони — Аргументация. Десять уроков для начинающих авторов (Флинта, Наука, 2005).djvu

<a id="Своды-правил-практической-аргументации-с-упражнениями"></a>
#### Своды правил практической аргументации с упражнениями

<!--- [NOTE_WINDOWS_LIMIT] Правильнее было бы отправить в подкатегорию “Своды правил практической аргументации”

[Morrow David](https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=b66J2fAAAAAJ), [Weston Anthony](https://www.elon.edu/u/directory/profile/?user=weston)

[NOTE_FULL_NAME] Morrow David, Weston Anthony — A Workbook For Arguments. A Complete Course In Critical Thinking (Hackett Publishing, 2019)

-->
1. Morrow David, Weston Anthony — A Workbook For Arguments (Hackett Publishing, 2019).pdf

<a id="Теория-аргументации"></a>
### Теория аргументации

<a id="Концепции-теории-аргументации"></a>
#### Концепции теории аргументации

<!--- [ACADEMIC_DEGREE] Согласно самой книге:

Эвелин Т. Фетерис — «является доцентом кафедры речевой коммуникации, теории аргументации и риторики Амстердамского университета. Она окончила Амстердамский университет по специальности голландский язык и литература со специализацией речевая коммуникация. В 1989 г. она получила докторскую степень (PhD) в Амстердамском университете. Её диссертация (на голландском языке) была посвящена правилам дискуссии в области права.»

Барт Гарссен — «окончил Амстердамский университет по специальности голландский язык и литература со специализацией речевая коммуникация. В 1997 г. он защитил докторскую диссертацию на голландском языке. Работа содержит теоретическое и эмпирическое исследование аргументативных схем с точки зрения прагма-диалектической теории.»

Сюзанн Герритсен — «окончила Амстердамский университет по специальности голландский язык и литература со специализацией речевая коммуникация. В 1999 г. она опубликовала свою докторскую диссертацию на голландском языке. В работе содержится анализ влияния невыраженных посылок на понимание текста.»

Питер Хоутлоссер — «защитил свою докторскую диссертацию в Амстердамском университете в 1995 г. Его диссертация, написанная на голландском языке, посвящена понятию точки зрения в критической дискуссии и содержит описание прагма-диалектического подхода к идентификации и реконструкции точек зрения.»

М. Аньес ван Реес — «окончила Амстердамский университет по специальностям общее языкознание и голландский язык и литература. В 1982 г. она получила докторскую степень в Лейденском университете. Её диссертация (на голландском языке) была посвящена интерпретации иллокутивных актов.»

А. Франциска Снук Хенкеманс — «В 1992 г. она получила докторскую степень в Амстердамском университете. Ее диссертация называется «Анализ сложной аргументации. Реконструкция множественной и сочинительной составной аргументации в критической дискуссии»»

Петер Хаутлоссер, Сюзанн Герритсен, Барт Гарссен, М. Аньес ван Реес, Эвелин Т. Фетерис

А. Франциска Снук Хенкеманс, [Narcis](https://www.narcis.nl/person/RecordID/PRS1253341/Language/en) — «Associate Professor. Language Mastery, Argumentation Theory and Rhetoric (UvA)»

[ACADEMIC_DEGREE_EDITORS] ван Еемерен Франс Хендрик, согласно самой книге «является заведующим кафедрой речевой коммуникации, теории аргументации и риторики Амстердамского университета»

Мигунов Анатолий Иванович, [Открытое образование](https://openedu.ru/teacher/2507/) — «кандидат философских наук, доцент кафедры логики СПбГУ»

[POSITIVE_OR_NEUTRAL_REVIEW][REVIEW_RETELLING] J. Anthony Blair, University of Windsor, [Argumentation and Advocacy](https://sci-hub.se/10.1080/00028533.2002.11821578) — «Although the authors, unsurprisingly, ex-press their preference for the Pragma-Dialec-tical spin on each topic, this book is emphat-ically not propaganda for Pragma-Dialectics. The reviews of each topic are organized in extremely clear and helpful ways, are re-markably comprehensive, and, if the work I am familiar with is representative, present the different theories and approaches with eminent fairness.», «It's a book I know I will use as an invaluable reference.»

Erik C. W. Krabbe, Faculty of Philosophy, Groningen University, [Argumentation](https://sci-hub.se/10.1023/A:1025159016942) — «Crucial Concepts, therefore,stands as a useful option for those desiring a more concise and topicalsurvey and for those who want to focus on topics rather than approaches.», «Consequently, the book can serveas a topical introduction to the entire field. Nevertheless, each contribu-tion is self-contained. There is an abundance of references, but, unfor-tunately, these were not collected in a joint bibliography.», «Unfortunately, when it comes to formal dialectic someaspects are not well explained», «Starting with traditional approachesto enthymemes she distinguishes a logical approach which neglects theinteractional aspects from a rhetorical approach which focuses mainly onthese aspects. This is an important distinction, but it goes too far to saythat formal logic does (according to Aristotle?) not apply to rhetorical arguments», «There is some meaning here, but it is hardto reconstruct.», « In some places the process ofrevision has left inaccuracies.», «The result is that especially Section 3 reads abit like a catalogue. Even after having been warned, it is somewhat unset-tling to meet with such an avalanche of literacy.», «This is not to detract fromthe significance of this commented bibliography for students and researchers for whom such a survey will be very useful.», «In sum it can be said that Crucial Concepts in Argumentation Theorymakes a useful guide through the jungle of crucial concepts, and even thatin its own way it actually constitutes an original and creative contributionto the growth of the field.»

[REVIEW_NO_ACCESS] Jesús María Larrazabal Antía, [Gogoa](https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=6373994)

[Kr/MCol]

[ADDITIONAL_READING] Франс Хендрик ван Еемерен, Роб Гроотендорст — Аргументация, коммуникация и ошибки (Argumentation, Communication, and Fallacies: A Pragma-dialectical Perspective)

Франс Хендрик ван Еемерен, Роб Гроотендорст — Речевые акты в аргументативных дискуссиях (Reconstructing argumentative discourse)

Франс Хендрик ван Еемерен, Роб Гроотендорст, Франсиска Снук Хенкеманс — Аргументация: анализ, проверка, представление (Argumentation. Analysis, Evaluation, Presentation)

Frans Hendrick van Eemeren, Bart Garssen (edited by) — Argumentation In Actual Practice: Topical Studies About Argumentative Discourse In Context

Austin J Freeley; David L Steinberg — Argumentation and debate: critical thinking for reasoned decision making

Дуглас Уолтон — Аргументы Ad hominem

Douglas Walton — Fundamentals of Critical Argumentation

Douglas Walton — Methods of Argumentation

Карл Густав Гемпель — Логика объяснения

Wesley C Salmon — Four Decades of Scientific Explanation

Ивин Александр Архипович — Аргументация в процессах коммуникации. Pro et contra

J. Anthony Blair — Groundwork in the Theory of Argumentation

J. Anthony Blair, Ralph Henry Johnson — Logical self-defense

Ralph H. Johnson — Manifest Rationality. A Pragmatic Theory of Argument

Стивен Л. Джонсон — Как побеждать в дебатах

Mario Gensollen — Virtudes argumentativas. Conversar en un mundo plural

[BOOK_SUPPORT] Международный центр изучения аргументации SICSAT
-->
1. ван Еемерен Франс Хендрик (под редакцией) — Важнейшие концепции теории аргументации (Филологический факультет СПбГУ, 2006).pdf

<a id="Новая-риторика"></a>
#### Новая риторика

<a id="Основы-новой-риторики"></a>
##### Основы новой риторики

<!--- [INFO] Рецензенты — доктора философских наук Александр Леонидович Никифоров — https://iphras.ru/nikiphorov.htm — и Евгений Евгеньевич Ледников — https://dic.academic.ru/dic.nsf/enc_biography/70370/%D0%9B%D0%B5%D0%B4%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%BA%D0%BE%D0%B2 -->
1. Ивин Александр Архипович — Основы теории аргументации (Гуманитарный издательский центр ВЛАДОС, 1997).pdf

<a id="Демагогические-приёмы"></a>
## Демагогические приёмы

<!--- [NOTE_MARKDOWN_LIMIT] Раздел «Эристика» -->

<a id="Классификация-демагогических-приёмов"></a>
### Классификация демагогических приёмов

<a id="NR-2"></a>
#### NR

<a id="Лысенкоизм"></a>
##### Лысенкоизм

<!--- [NOTE] Доказательств, что Богатырёв является специалистом по тематике, не нашёл. Согласно посту на форуме Кургиняна, он программист — http://www.kurginyan.ru/board/index.php?s=&showtopic=1041&view=findpost&p=45683 

[BOOK_CITATIONS] «"Т. Д. Лысенко, был бедствием для советской науки — все его "предсказания" и "теории" оказались ложными".» Получатель информации, как правило, не сведущ в достижениях современной молекулярной биологии и поэтому, выводу о "ложности" и, следовательно, вредоносности теорий Лысенко верит на слово. Получатель информации даже не подозревает, что положения теории Лысенко "признанные ошибочными и не соответствующими данным мировой науки (читай: не соответствующими мнению ЗАПАДНЫХ авторитетов начала 60-х годов)" при разгроме "лысенковщины", подтверждены современной наукой экспериментально по 4 из 5 ключевых утверждений. В частности, за утверждение теории Т. Д. Лысенко (подтверждённое в 70-х экспериментально), что наследственная информация передаётся не только через материал ядра клетки, но и через цитоплазму, в 1983 году американка Барбара Мак Клинток получила Нобелевскую премию![1]

«Кстати "Великий Миф О Репрессиях", похоже, в их "системе верований" — ключевой. Уж слишком часто повторяется.», «Очень хорошо хранить под рукой ссылки на сами источники с комментариями вида: "вот здесь (ссылка на источник) ссылка на исследования учёных, доказавших ложность и полную бредовость этого Мифа".», «Причём Солженицыным и его последователями старательно умалчивается тот факт, что репрессии затронули исключительно узкий слой общества.», «По теме фальсифицированных документов: Ю. Мухин "История одной фальшивки". Очень хорошо показано в статье, как эти фальшивки делаются, и какие признаки их отличают от множества других, но действительных. Впрочем, если не боитесь толстых трудов, то можно порекомендовать И. Пыхалов "Великая Оболганная Война".»

«Из них вполне логично следует, необходимость и желательность безработицы для экономики любой страны.», «Умалчивалось то, что данные "кривые" являются давно доказанной фальшивкой и хрестоматийным примером крупного жульничества в эконометрии. Публикаций по этой теме — тьма.»

[CRIM_OFFENSIVE] «которые ныне во множестве стали появляться, на независимых от лжецов-либералов Интернет-ресурсах, в частности, на нашем "Русском проекте"», «В виду исключительной тупости западного охлоса и его чудовищной необразованности, он глотает самые идиотские штампы убеждения, вдолбленные такой вот пропагандой.», «В нашем случае, при требовании приведения примеров, демагог тут же срывается на визг ибо таких примеров не существует в природе.»
-->
1. Богатырёв Александр Петрович — Демагогические шаблоны. Основы полемики с демагогами (Самиздат, 2013).epub

<a id="Логика"></a>
## Логика

<a id="Логика-высказываний"></a>
### Логика высказываний

<!--- [NOTE_MARKDOWN_LIMIT] Раздел «Формальная логика» -->

<a id="NR-3"></a>
#### NR

<a id="Малопрактичность"></a>
##### Малопрактичность

<!--- [Гжегорчик Анджей](http://philosophy.spbu.ru/userfiles/rusphil/Veche_29./Veche29_28.pdf) -->
1. Гжегорчик Анджей — Популярная логика (Наука, 1979).djvu

<a id="Логика-оценок-и-норм"></a>
### Логика оценок и норм

<!--- [BOOK_SCEDRECO] 2 рецензента, доктора философских наук

[CRIM_FILE_QUALITY] Вырезана концовка -->
1. Ивин Александр Архипович — Логика оценок и норм. Философские, методологические и прикладные аспекты (Проспект, 2016).pdf

<a id="Логичное-мышление"></a>
### Логичное мышление

<!---  [INFO] Не нашёл критики Ивина 
[Автор](https://iphras.ru/page26104614.htm)

[INFO] Рецензенты — доктора философских наук Ивлев Юрий Васильевич — https://istina.msu.ru/profile/ivlevYuV/ — и Владимир Иванович Шалак — https://iphras.ru/shalak.htm -->
1. Ивин Александр Архипович — Искусство мыслить правильно (Проспект, 2016).pdf

<a id="Понятия-логики"></a>
### Понятия логики

<!--- [DUPLICATE_GI] 

[Автор](http://mpgu.su/staff/gusev/)
-->
1. Гусев Дмитрий Алексеевич — Удивительная логика (Энас, 2010).pdf

<a id="Практическая-логика"></a>
### Практическая логика

<a id="NR-4"></a>
#### NR

<a id="Малопрактичность-1"></a>
##### Малопрактичность

<!--- [Светлов Виктор Александрович](http://pgups.scbist.com/forum/pgups/phylos-1.htm) -->
1. Светлов Виктор Александрович — Практическая логика (Нобель Пресс, 2013).djvu

<a id="Теория-аргументации-и-логика"></a>
### Теория аргументации и логика

<!--- [NOTE_MARKDOWN_LIMIT] Раздел «Формальная логика» -->

<a id="NR-5"></a>
#### NR

<a id="Малопрактичность-2"></a>
##### Малопрактичность

<!--- [Никифоров Александр Леонидович](https://iphras.ru/nikiphorov.htm) -->
1. Никифоров Александр Леонидович — Логика и теория аргументации. Вводный курс (УРАО, 2003).pdf

<a id="Учебники-логики"></a>
### Учебники логики

<a id="Американские-учебники-логики"></a>
#### Американские учебники логики

<!--- [ACADEMIC_DEGREE] Hurley — «Professor Emeritus, Philosophy; J.D., University of San Diego; PhD, St.Louis University» — https://web.archive.org/web/20160223003307/http://www.sandiego.edu/cas/philosophy/faculty-and-staff/biography.php?profile_id=920 ; Watson — «received her Ph.D. in philosophy from the University of Illinois-Chicago in 2004.» — https://web.archive.org/web/20181119095426/https://www.sandiego.edu/cas/philosophy/faculty-and-staff/biography.php?profile_id=139

[POSITIVE_OR_NEUTRAL_REVIEW] Robert C. Robinson, Georgia Perimeter College, Atlanta — https://sci-hub.se/https://www.pdcnet.org/teachphil/content/teachphil_2015_0038_0001_0132_0136 — «Logic textbooks have come a long way. If you’re like me, you teach a course called “critical thinking” or “informal logic,” you have in mind a rough outline of topics—Venn diagrams, truth tables, informal and formal fallacies—and you long ago chose a text to compliment that outline.», «For a num ber o f years I have been growing frustrated at the increasing price o f college textbooks, and the frequency with which new editions are introduced. M uch of the value in this new text lies in the software package that the authors and publishers have developed to com plim ent the text. In my experience, students do w ork through the A plia exercises, and doing so really does aid in their understanding o f the material, and in particular helps to reach those students who otherwise m ay com e to class entirely disengaged with the material.»

[REVIEW_ONE_PAGE] Irving H. Anellis, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis ( https://iupui.academia.edu/IrvingAnellis/CurriculumVitae ) — https://projecteuclid.org/journalArticle/Download?urlid=rml%2F1204835019 — «It is organized in such a flexible waythat it can be used either as a textbook for an informal logic course for liberal arts students,as an introductory undergraduate philosophy course in formal logic, or as an introductorysymbolic logic course for upper division philosophy undergraduates or graduate students», «The historical sketch and the op-portunities it can afford us to talk to our students about the history of our subject thereforemakes Hurley's text a welcome addition to the vast array of otherwise nearly indistinguish-able introductory texts»

[ADDITIONAL_READING] Barnet, Sylvan; Bedau, Hugo; O'Hara, John — «Critical Thinking, Reading and Writing: A Brief Guide to Argument»;

Cohen, Carl; Copi, Irving M.; McMahon, Kenneth D — «Introduction to Logic»;

Гетманова Александра Денисовна — «Логика»

[NO_SCEDRECO] -->
1. Hurley Patrick J., Watson Lori — A Concise Introduction to Logic (Cengage Learning, 2018).pdf

<a id="Российские-учебники-логики"></a>
#### Российские учебники логики

<!--- [DUPLICATE_GI]

[NOTE] Отчество, указанное в самой книге — «Александрович» -->
1. Гусев Дмитрий Алексеевич — Популярная логика и занимательные задачи (Прометей, 2015).pdf
<!--- [DUPLICATE_GI]

[Никифоров Александр Леонидович](https://iphras.ru/nikiphorov.htm)

[BOOK_SAME] «Общедоступная и увлекательная книга по логике» того же автора 1995 года — это более ранняя версия «Логики и теории аргументации» -->
1. Никифоров Александр Леонидович — Логика и теория аргументации (Современный гуманитарный университет, 2005).pdf

<a id="Формальная-логика"></a>
### Формальная логика

<a id="Научный-метод-и-формальная-логика"></a>
#### Научный метод и формальная логика

<!--- [ACADEMIC_DEGREE] Коэн — Ph.D. in philosophy at Harvard, which he received in 1906 — https://www.lib.uchicago.edu/e/scrc/findingaids/view.php?eadid=ICU.SPCL.MRCOHEN ; Нагель — in 1931, a Ph.D. in philosophy from Columbia — http://www.nasonline.org/publications/biographical-memoirs/memoir-pdfs/nagel-ernest.pdf

[ACADEMIC_DEGREE_TRANSLATOR] Пётр Сергеевич Куслий, кандидат философских наук — https://iphras.ru/kusliy.htm

[CRIM_OLD] Впервые учебник вышел в 1934; последнее на момент перевода переиздание 2007 года

[POSITIVE_OR_NEUTRAL_REVIEW] Charles Malik, Cambridge, Mass — https://sci-hub.se/10.1086/346957 — «As an elementary introduction to the meaning and function of logic in civilized activity, this book is quite valuable. It is intended to introduce its subject to college students, but it may very profitably be read by the general reader.», «The emphasis that the authors seem to lay on truth and truth-values is quite foreign to logic thus widely conceived, for, if complications of " truth " belong essentially to logic, then the authors are under obligation to elaborate a doctrine of truth, whiich, however, is completely missing in their work.», «We feel, furthermore, that another allied defect in almost all extant texts of logic is their reference at critical points to the question of interpretation of abstract systems without giving an adequate metaphysic of the possibility of such interpretation», «The scientific method, we are told (p. 392), solves all "the problems which meet us in daily life." Scientific procedure is depicted as the chief real agency for " uniting man " (p. 403). We challenge the truth of both these positions. There is abundant evidence that, far from solving all our solvable daily problems, science is increasingly adding to our scientifically unsolvable concrete problems.», «We feel that the text of the book is not sufficient but should be supplemented with the good suggestions for further reading given at the end of the book»

The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease — https://journals.lww.com/jonmd/Citation/1934/10000/An_Introduction_to_Logic_and_Scientific_Method.39.aspx — «This very comprehensive work offers a thorough recapitulation of the methods and objectives of logic and scientific thought as applied in the various disciplines of human knowledge.»

Henry Bradford Smith, University of Pennsylvania — https://sci-hub.se/10.1086/286347 — «It is encyclopaedic and at the same time it is competent. It is a book to be welcomed. And it is a book that will be used.», «And speaking of opportunities overlooked, on page I45-6, where the reader's doubts concerning the consistency of non-Euclidean geometry are met by showing the consistency of a miniature system, the section should surely end by a brief reference to the work of Beltrami, as otherwise the reader's doubts are not removed.», «There is one statement in the book which the reviewer would like to challenge, as he has challenged it many times before: "We do not believe that there is any non-Aristotelian logic in the sense in which there is a non-Euclidean geometry, that is, a system of logic in which the contraries of the Aristotelian principles of contradiction and excluded middle are assumed to be true, and valid inferences are drawn from them" (page v).»

[REVIEW_HIGH_ERUDITION] Шрамко Ярослав Владиславович, кандидат философских наук — https://www.phisci.info/jour/article/viewFile/1926/1858 — «Данный учебник примечателен тем, что будучи написанным в 30-х гг. ХХ столетия, т.е. в то время, когда логическая наука уже окончательно пришла к своему современному виду, он отразил зарождение интересной тенденции во взглядах на цели, задачи и содержание общего (неспециализированного) курса логики.», «Оценивая содержание первой книги данного учебника, следует отметить, что оно выполнено на достаточно высоком профессиональном уровне. Вместе с тем, при обсуждении традиционных тем, авторам не удалось избежать некоторых распространенных неточностей, которыми часто страдают «общедоступные» учебные пособия по логике.», «Отмечая в целом очень хорошее качество перевода, хотелось бы отдельно остановиться на затронутой выше проблеме перевода термина «proposition». Не так давно эта проблема стала поводом для обширной (и, к сожалению, местами довольно ожесточенной) дискуссии», «Но достаточно даже бегло сравнить получившийся результат и исходный текст, чтобы убедиться в том, насколько удачнее был бы прямой перевод «proposition» как «высказывание».»

[BOOK_OR_AUTHOR_OR_CONCEPT_CRITICISM] Cecil Alec Mace, Professor of Psychology — https://sci-hub.se/10.1017/s0031819100033684 — «To what extent discussions of the applications of logic to specialized branches of science should find a place in a general introduction to the subject is a matter on which there can be reasonable difference of opinion, but it is diffcult to see why the historical sciences should be selected for special consideration, and still more diffcult to justify excursions into the sphere of morals and aesthetics.», «The trouble is that such topics cannot be treated to advantage without considerable preliminary expositions wholly inappropriate to a general textbook of logic.», «Contemporary logicians are not unanimous, and on the controversial issues the authors are entitled to their opinions, which are always clearly presented and defended.»

[DUPLICATE_GI]

[NOTE] Пользуюсь версией от Litres, поскольку другой имеющийся в Интернете PDF-файл плохо отсканирован -->
1. Коэн Морис Рафаэль, Нагель Эрнест — Введение в логику и научный метод (Социум, 2010).pdf

<a id="Логика-доказывания"></a>
## Логика доказывания

<a id="NR-6"></a>
### NR

<a id="Малопрактичность-3"></a>
#### Малопрактичность

<!--- [Эйсман Алексей Александрович](https://determiner.ru/termin/eisman-aleksei-aleksandrovich.html)

[NO_OCR] -->
1. Эйсман Алексей Александрович — Логика доказывания (Юридическая литература, 1971).djvu

<a id="Логические-ошибки"></a>
## Логические ошибки

<a id="Перечни-логических-ошибок"></a>
### Перечни логических ошибок

<!--- [Kr/MCol][N/MCol]

[ACADEMIC_DEGREE_EDITORS] Arp, [Missouri Western State University, CV](https://www.missouriwestern.edu/social-sciences-and-humanities/wp-content/uploads/sites/164/2020/06/Robert-Arp-CV.pdf) — «Ph.D. Philosophy, Saint Louis University»

Barbone, [San Diego University, Department of Philosophy, CV](https://philosophy.sdsu.edu/_resources/docs/cv/barbone-cv-2019.pdf) — «Marquette University, May 1997, PhD philosophy»

[NO_ACADEMIC_OR_PROFESSIONAL_DEGREE] Брюс, согласно самой книге — «software consultant in San Francisco and specializes in the history of Western philosophy»

[ACADEMIC_DEGREE] Большинство авторов книги имеет степень PhD, однако:

«Dan Burkett is a doctoral student in philosophy at Rice University»

«Christian Cotton is an independent scholar, author, and game developer who has published in the areas of moral and political philosophy»

«Jennifer Culver is an instructional tech specialist at the UNT Health Science Center»

«Heather Rivera is an independent writer on philosophy.»

[ADDITIONAL_READING] Stéphan Reebs, «Science et Pensée Critique» — https://www.umoncton.ca/umcm-sciences/sites/umcm-sciences.prod.umoncton.ca/files/wf/notes_de_cours_pensee_critique.pdf

George Sher (editor) — «Ethics: Essential Readings in Moral Theory»

[NO_REVIEW] -->
1. Arp Robert, Barbone Steven, Bruce Michael (edited by) — Bad Arguments. 100 of the Most Important Fallacies in Western Philosophy (Wiley Blackwell, 2019).pdf
<!--- [NO_ACADEMIC_DEGREE] [Personal site, CV](https://bo-bennett.socialpsychology.org/cv/resume.pdf) — «Walden University, PhD in Social Psychology (graduated 2015)»

[CRIM_SELF-PUBLISHING] eBookIt

[ADDITIONAL_READING] Jeffrey P. Mehltretter Drury — «Argumentation in Everyday Life»

Judith A. Boss — «THiNK Critical Thinking And Logic Skills For Everyday Life»

Ralph H. Johnson, J. Anthony Blair — Logical Self-Defence
-->
1. Bennett Bo — Logically Fallacious (eBookIt, 2012).epub
<!--- [Pirie Madsen](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Madsen_Pirie) -->
1. Pirie Madsen — How to Win Every Argument. The Use and Abuse of Logic (Continuum, 2006).pdf

<a id="Прогнозирование"></a>
## Прогнозирование

<a id="Проблемы-предсказаний-и-байесовская-теорема"></a>
### Проблемы предсказаний и байесовская теорема

<a id="NR-7"></a>
#### NR

<a id="Противоречие-научным-фактам"></a>
##### Противоречие научным фактам

<!--- [PROFESSIONAL_DEGREE] Baseball Prospectus author — https://www.baseballprospectus.com/author/nate_silver/ ; KPMG economic consultant, The New York Times journalist — https://www.kuleuven.be/communicatie/congresbureau/english/corporate-events-1/patron-saints-day/bio-eng/2013/nate-silver

[CRIM_SPEAKER] https://www.ted.com/speakers/nate_silver

[POSITIVE_OR_NEUTRAL_REVIEW] Ken Simonson, Associated General Contractors of Americ — https://sci-hub.se/https://link.springer.com/article/10.1057/be.2012.33 — «Unfortunately, Silver’s messages for econo-mists are somewhat mixed», «Sometimes thesearguments are valid to a certain extent: the Ameri-can economy is a constantly evolving thing andperiodically undergoes structural shifts», «In discussing the often large revisions in dataon which economic forecasts are based, Silver de-livers another mixed message. “So we should havesome sympathy for economic forecasters”»

Sungjong Roh, Cornell University — https://www.academia.edu/download/36890175/Roh2014.pdf — «An unfortunate weakness is the number ofmathematical mistakes, miswordings of text, and mis-placement of information in tables and figures, whichmay confuse a careful reader.»

Lisa R. Goldberg, University of California — https://sci-hub.se/10.1080/14697688.2013.854925 — «Arguing that the rating agenciescould have foreseen the housing bubble, Silver emphasizes thatcapable economists such as Robert Shiller and Paul Krugmanhad forecast the event. But, he fails to point out that thoseforecasts were embedded in a sea of conflicting predictionsby economists who may be just as capable, despite the factthat they turned out be wrong. This ishindsight bias, whichobscures the ability to recall the complexity and uncertainty ofsituations in the past.»

James S. West, M.D., is Assistant Professor of Psychiatry, Edward Hebert School of Medicine in Bethesda, Maryland — https://sci-hub.se/10.1521/psyc.2014.77.3.312

[REVIEW_ONE_PAGE] Tim Chapin, The Florida State University — https://sci-hub.se/10.1080/01944363.2013.772035

[BOOK_OR_AUTHOR_OR_CONCEPT_CRITICISM][REVIEW_SMASHER] Michael Mann, Ph.D. Yale University, Department of Geology & Geophysics ( https://michaelmann.net/about/cv ) — https://www.huffpost.com/entry/nate-silver-climate-change_b_1909482 — «But he falls victim to a fallacy that has become all too common among those who view the issue through the prism of economics rather than science. Nate conflates problems of prediction in the realm of human behavior — where there are no fundamental governing ‘laws’ and any “predictions” are potentially laden with subjective and untestable assumptions — with problems such as climate change, which are governed by laws of physics, like the greenhouse effect, that are true whether or not you choose to believe them.», «Nate devotes far too much space to the highly questionable claims of a University of Pennsylvania marketing Professor named J. Scott Armstrong. Armstrong made a name for himself in denialist circles back in 2007 by denouncing climate models as having no predictive value at all. A simple check of either SourceWatch or fossil fuel industry watchdog ExxonSecrets, reveals that Armstrong is a well-known climate change denier.», «I suspect that Nate’s failing here arises from a sort of cultural bias. There is a whole community of pundits with origins in economics and marketing who seem more than happy to dismiss the laws of physics when they conflict with their philosophy of an unregulated market.», «When it came to areas like climate change well outside his own expertise, he to some extent fell into the same “one trick pony” trap that was the downfall of Levitt. (and arguably others like Malcolm Gladwell in The Tipping Point). That is, he repeatedly invokes the alluring, but fundamentally unsound, principle that simple ideas about forecasting and prediction from one field, like economics, can readily be appropriated and applied to completely different fields, without a solid grounding in the principles, assumptions, and methods of those fields. As a result, Nate’s chapter on climate change (Chapter 12: “A Climate of Healthy Skepticism”) is marred by straw man claims that don’t stand up to scrutiny.», «And Nate does gives this topic some lip service, he repeatedly falls victim to the fallacy that tracking year-to-year fluctuations in temperature (the noise) can tell us something about predictions of global warming trends (the signal). They can’t — they really can’t.», «Nate’s view of uncertainty, and its implications for climate model predictions, is particularly misguided. Uncertainty, as many economists recognize, is thus a reason for action, not inaction! I’m surprised someone as sharp as Nate just doesn’t appear to get that.», «He ignores the fact that those scientists willing to feed the false “scientists are exaggerating” narrative are the true darlings of the “balance” over “objectivity” school of news reporting — a school of thought that Nate sadly seems to have subscribed to.», «He characterizes this simply as a battle between “consensus” scientists and “skeptical” individuals, as if we’re talking about two worthy adversaries in a battle. This framing is flawed on multiple levels, not the least of which is that those he calls “skeptics” are in fact typically no such thing.», «Nate could have applied his considerable acumen and insight to shed light on this important topic. But the result was instead a very mixed bag of otherwise useful commentary marred by needless misconceptions and inappropriately laundered denialist memes.»

[NO_PDF][NO_SCEDRECO] -->
1. Сильвер Нейт — Сигнал и шум. Почему одни прогнозы сбываются, а другие — нет (КоЛибри, 2015).fb2

<a id="Суперпрогнозирование"></a>
### Суперпрогнозирование

<!--- [JOURNALISM_DEGREE] Гарднер писал для «Globe and Mail», CNBC, «Boston Globe», «Washington Post» — https://dangardner.ca/mnt/volume_tor1_01/www/spark/dangardner.ca/web/articles

[CRIM_BESTSELLER][CRIM_SPEAKER][CRIM_CONSULTING]

[INFO] «Суперпрогнозирование. Искусство и наука предвидения» — та же книга

[NOTE] В pdf и fb2 файлах книги на Рутрекере отсутствуют сноски — https://rutracker.org/forum/viewtopic.php?t=5685478

[POSITIVE_OR_NEUTRAL_REVIEW][REVIEW_RETELLING] Львов С.В., ВЦИОМ — https://profi.wciom.ru/index.php?id=2117&uid=9809

Tobias F. Rötheli, Department of EconomicsUniversity of Erfurt — https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2887366 — «Of course, as with any other interesting experiment there remain some unanswered questions. One issue concerns the tasks actually selected by individual forecasters among a longer list of problems. A related issue then is how people perform in a professional setting where they have to routinely assess certain and non-negotiable forecasting questions. And one more critical point: one mechanism that tends to decrease the score of ordinary forecasters is the well-known general tendency for overconfidence.»

[CRITICISM_PROFESSIONAL] Daniel Buncic, University of St. Gallen, Institute of Mathematics and Statistics — https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9091/4/3/24/htm — «I highly recommend the book not only to practitioners who are dealing with forecasting problems on a regular basis, or academics that are interested in more technical, research questions related scoring rules, the evaluation of forecasts, and the like, but also to a much wider audience.», «Since this is a critical review, I should say a few words about what I did not like so much in the book. All assessments of forecast accuracy and comparisons across forecasters in the book (and the GJP as a whole) are based on the Brier Score (BS)», «However, if I am aware of this as a forecaster (and I am sure many forecasters are), I will be more inclined to provide weak predictive signals, in the sense that I will have a preference for my forecasts to be close to the 50% uninformative prediction most of the time, unless I feel extremely confident. This is exactly the type of forecast that nobody wants to have.», «Thus, the use of scoring rules that encourage weak predictions provide weak information for policy relevant actions. In an econometric or model based prediction setting, obtaining forecasted probabilities that are nearly always close to 50% would raise doubts about the informativeness of the model, or, to put it in econometrics jargon, the goodness of fit of the model to the data.», «Another issue with how BS is used throughout the book is that only point estimates are provided, without any mention of the uncertainty surrounding these estimates.», «the authors of, in fact, derive standard errors and confidence intervals for the Brier Score and Brier Skill Score», «So let me conclude this review with the words that the book is a great read, very informative, entertaining, and, above all, provides the reader with a summary of the experiences of forecasters in a life long project that Tetlock has been involved in since about 1984»

[REVIEW_RETELLING] Błażej Sajduk, Uniwersytet Jagielloński w Krakowie — https://journals.akademicka.pl/politeja/article/download/470/400

Alexander T. Jackson Assistant Professor, Sydney L. Reichin Graduate Student, Psychology Department Middle Tennessee State University — https://sci-hub.se/10.1111/peps.12272 — «Those who wish to improve their own predictions and judgments should read this book.», «Researchers have advocated ways of reducing cognitive biases (e.g., Larrick, 2004), yet such attempts to reduce biases have been largely unsuccessful (Hastie & Dawes, 2010).»

[REVIEW_RETELLING] Risto Conte Keivabu, European University Institute, Florence — https://sreview.soc.cas.cz/pdfs/csr/2019/03/10.pdf

[BOOK_OR_AUTHOR_OR_CONCEPT_CRITICISM][REVIEW_SMASHER] Klaus Solberg Søilen, Department of Engineering, Natural Sciences and Economics, Faculty of Marketing, Halmstad University — https://ojs.hh.se/index.php/JISIB/article/download/305/186 — «More interesting, the authors explain how their wok is supported by the American Intelligence Community (IC) and that its participants have outperformed other analysts. This is a claim throughout the book which is never explained in any detail. We are not told much about how the actual competition was arranged, for example how the answers were graded.», «The authors go on to argue for the value of the Brier score that measures the accuracy of probabilistic predictions. But they fail to note that the Brier score becomes inadequate for very rare (or very frequent) events, because it does not sufficiently discriminate between small changes in forecasts. The authors fail to see the fundamental difference between predicting the weather with fewer and easier variables to measure and predicting human behavior which consists of many more variables that are more difficult to measure and that frequentlyvary under the same conditions, such as when a customer suddenly decides not to buy an ice-cream on a hot day even though he did so a week ago under similar conditions.», «I think the book offers some good advice in terms of rules of thumb, which we shall come back to, but so far the suggestions made imply that the analysts have just become smarter fencing off potential criticism for potential mistakes. If this is how the authors won the competition against their colleagues in the IC –by giving vaguer answers -then that is no real victory, but a statistical trick.», «So far into the book this seems to be the essence, and a better title mayhave been “the art of careful expressions”. The question remains what kind of people you would like to fill your intelligence department with, well-read experts or people who have learned that careful expressions will put you in the right more often?», «Thus, it is disheartening to see how the authors stay with their initial method in this example, they should have said 60-70%. Then they would not have been completely wrong and that, the authors think, would have been better. For whom? For the estimated 1 million Iraqis who died as a result of the conflict?», «One interpretation says that Obama would have attacked the facility no matter how small the odds were for finding bin Laden. If that is true it borders to analmost bizarre example of decision making that resembles gambling, which may or may not be what he meant.», «The reader is annoyed by the probability figuresthe authors keep throwing around in the chapters, like the 60% probability that polonium would be found in Arafat’s body (p. 153). The authors should for once tell the reader how the analyst got to that figure, as that calculation is the cornerstone of the whole method suggested in this book. It’s not explained anywhere.», «Instead, there is an insinuation, a hint to the reader to draw his own conclusion that they are in fact super because their predictions are best, which is a claim that can never be tested.», «They do not discuss cultural similarities or differences either, I assume again because they do not look at knowledge but how you think. Sure, China may face great difficulties and may even decline as a result, but the authors are too light on this question. The simplicity with which this parallel is treated is symptomatic of the whole book when it comes to questions of history, geography and culture.», «For one thing there is nothing that has been presented in the book that helps explain why the project was better at predicting events than anybody else, if we are to believe that that is true.», «It seems like a proven way to sell consultancy, but does not convince a reader who is even half awake.»

[NO_PDF] -->
1. Тетлок Филип, Гарднер Дэн — Думай медленно — предсказывай точно. Искусство и наука предвидеть опасность (АСТ, 2018).epub

<a id="Эристика"></a>
## Эристика

<a id="Теория-и-практика-спора-и-полемики"></a>
### Теория и практика спора и полемики

1. Поварнин Сергей Иннокентьевич — Спор. О теории и практике спора (Флинта, 2017).pdf

<a id="NR-8"></a>
#### NR

<a id="Написание-автором-паранаучной-статьи"></a>
##### Написание автором паранаучной статьи

<!--- [Родос Валерий Борисович](http://towiki.ru/view/%D0%92%D0%B0%D0%BB%D0%B5%D1%80%D0%B8%D0%B9_%D0%91%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%B8%D1%81%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B8%D1%87_%D0%A0%D0%BE%D0%B4%D0%BE%D1%81)

[NOTE] Родос — автор паранаучной статьи «Дарвинизм» — https://trv-science.ru/2009/04/korchevatel-2-posleslovie/ -->
1. Родос Валерий Борисович — Теория и практика полемики (Издательство Томского университета, 1989).epub

<a id="Уловки-в-спорах"></a>
### Уловки в спорах

<a id="Логические-и-психологические-уловки-в-спорах"></a>
#### Логические и психологические уловки в спорах

<!--- [Винокур Владимир Александрович](https://psy.su/persons/100_psihologov_rossii/psy/79489/) -->
1. Винокур Владимир Александрович — Уловки в споре (Речь, 2005).pdf

<a id="Разновидности-уловок-в-спорах"></a>
#### Разновидности уловок в спорах

<!--- [Шопенгауэр Артур](https://iphlib.ru/library/collection/newphilenc/document/HASH8a532e99622576075c348a)

[NO_OCR] -->
1. Шопенгауэр Артур — Эристика, или искусство побеждать в спорах (Складъ въ книжномъ магазине Ф.И.Митюрникова, 1900).djvu

<a id="Атеизм-и-религия"></a>
# Атеизм и религия

<a id="Несовместимость-науки-и-религии"></a>
## Несовместимость науки и религии

<!--- [ACADEMIC_DEGREE] «Harvard University, 1973-1978. Ph.D. in Biology» — https://pondside.uchicago.edu/ecol-evol/faculty/Coyne/pdf/coyne_cv_and_pubs.pdf

[Автор](https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=iME3jMYAAAAJ)
-->
1. Койн Джерри Аллен — Вера против фактов. Почему наука и религия несовместимы (Альпина Диджитал, 2015).pdf

<a id="Бедность-и-неравенство"></a>
# Бедность и неравенство

<a id="Рандомистское-переосмысление-борьбы-с-крайней-бедностью"></a>
## Рандомистское переосмысление борьбы с крайней бедностью

<a id="HC"></a>
### HC

<!--- [ACADEMIC_DEGREE] Banerjee, [MIT Economics, CV](https://economics.mit.edu/files/19335) — «1988 — PhD Economics, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts. Title of doctoral thesis: Essays in Information Economics.

Duflo, [MIT Economics, CV](https://economics.mit.edu/files/14455) — «1999 — Ph.D. in Economics, MIT. Thesis Title: Three Essays in Empirical Development Economics»

[AUTHORS_PROJECT] [Abdul Latif Jameel Poverty Action Lab (J-PAL)](https://www.povertyactionlab.org/) — «Global research center working to reduce poverty by ensuring that policy is informed by scientific evidence.»

[Is/Mass]

[POSITIVE_OR_NEUTRAL_REVIEW]

[REVIEW_RETELLING] Camille Sutter, Ancienne élève de l’ENS de Lyon, [Lectures](https://journals.openedition.org/lectures/8284) — «C'est ainsi qu'Abhijit Banerjee et Esther Duflo introduisent leur ouvrage Repenser la pauvreté. Le texte a pour objectif d'examiner « ce que la vie et les choix des pauvres nous apprennent quant à la façon dont il faut mener la lutte contre la pauvreté à l'échelle mondiale».

[REVIEW_RETELLING] Judith Favereau, Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne, [OEconomia](https://www.academia.edu/download/35803998/Poor_Economics_Judith_Favereau.pdf) — «Cette charge contre l’économie politique ne manquera pas desusciter des interrogations», «il est difficile, à la fin dulivre, de comprendre réellement quelles sont les prescriptions desauteurs pour améliorer la vie des pauvres. Certes, le lecteur trouverades éléments de réponse partiels, mais les recommandations enmatière de politiques sociales locales restent floues.», «Cela expose Duflo et Banerjee à une fortecontradiction : les seules vraies améliorations ou«solutions»qu’ilsproposent sont globales alors que leur méthodologie ne leur permetune évaluation qu’au niveau local et ne se prête pas facilement à lagénéralisation.», «Quant à l’objectif de lutte contre la pauvreté au travers depolitiques sociales locales, les enseignements généraux que l’on peuttirer de l’ouvrage restent suspendus à une meilleure compréhensionde l’articulation entre institutions locales et globales.»

[REVIEW_LONG] Jacques Henri Coste, Maître de conférences à l’Université Sorbonne Nouvelle – Paris III, [Entreprendre & Innover](https://www.cairn.info/journal-entreprendre-et-innover-2013-1-page-90.htm) — «L’ouvrage se veut une base de données et de connaissances très informée, qui résulte de centaines d’études de terrain conduites dans une douzaine pays du monde.», «L’ouvrage d’Esther Duflo et de son mentor présente l’immense mérite de réhabiliter la recherche empirique et de remettre au centre de l’Agora la réalité des faits et des expériences.», «Mais ce pragmatisme assumé a aussi ses limites. Il n’envisage pas un point de vue coordonné entre instances d’action concrètes et institutions mondiales. Pas de processus de gouvernance du développement en dehors du local.», «Mais la construction d’un modèle macroéconomique de sortie de la pauvreté comme un mécano, à partir des blocs microéconomiques, est-elle réaliste? L’insistance dans l’emploi d’une terminologie technique et le refus de penser en dehors de tout contexte politique et historique ne cache-t-elle pas une forme d’idéologie?», «Au total, la posture simpliste des auteurs fait l’économie de l’analyse de la perspective historique, des dynamiques macroéconomiques, des mobilisations collectives, des enjeux de pouvoir et de domination. La question d’une coordination et d’une coopération plus harmonieuse entre État, marché et instances de la société civile n’est pas ou peu posée. Comment penser que l’on pourra combattre effectivement la pauvreté sans analyser les relations sociales dans lesquelles celle-ci se construit et se perpétue?»

[REVIEW_RETELLING] Teller Nóra, Városkutatás Kft. (Metropolitan Research Institute), [Socio.hu](https://socio.hu/uploads/files/2017_1/teller_rec.pdf) — « A kétségkívül szórakoztatóan és fordulatosan megírt könyv könnyű és emlékezetes olvasmány lehet a szakterületen kevésbé otthonosan mozgók, de a sze-génység kérdését közelebbről megismerni vágyók népesebb csoportjának is.»

[REVIEW_RETELLING] María Pilar Campoy Muñoz, Universidad Loyola, [Revista de Fomento Social](https://www.revistadefomentosocial.es/rfs/article/download/1772/364) — «En resumen, se trata de una obra que invita a mirar desde otra perspectiva la vida de los pobres, pero sobre todo a buscar en ellas las respuestas que permitan abordar el problema de la pobreza a nivel global.», «Esta mezcla convierte al libro de de los profesores Banerjee y Dufflo en un punto de partida muy interesante para aquellos investigadores interesados en esta nueva forma de hacer economía, al mismo tiempo que resulta de gran utilidad para todos aquellos actores de las políticas gubernamentales destinadas a ayudar a los más pobres, desde los técnicos encargados de su diseño y evaluación, hasta los gestores locales responsables de su implementación, pasando por los políticos que, en primera y última instancia, deciden la agenda de prioridades en la lucha contra la pobreza.»

[REVIEW_RETELLING] Luis Alberto Islas Ochoa, Maestrante de la Línea Economía Social, Maestría y Doctorado en Estudios Sociales, DCSH, UAM-Iztapalapa, [Denarius](https://denarius.izt.uam.mx/index.php/denarius/article/download/455/363) — «El libro que aquí reseñamos es un esfuerzo académico de 15 años, y su objetivo principal es “entender de verdad sus vidas (de las personas más pobres) en toda su complejidad y riqueza” (p. 12). Las contribuciones de este libro son bastas.», «El libro es una invitación a “mirar más de cerca” para de verdad comprender la vida de los más pobres e identificar, en primera instancia, las trampas de pobreza donde realmente se encuentran y, consecuentemente, ofrecer soluciones realis-tas y objetivas para que “nadie tenga que vivir con 99 centavos al día”.»

[REVIEW_RETELLING] Tulio Javier Montemiranda A., Ana Cristina Muñoz T., Estudiantes del programa de Economía de la Universidad de Antioquia, [Perfil de Coyuntura Económica](http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1657-42142011000100009) — «Poor Economics nos permite pensar en una nueva forma de entender la economía de los pobres a nivel mundial, replanteando de manera práctica las formas de evaluar y plantear soluciones para salir de la pobreza.», « Recomendamos este libro como una lectura que nos puede ayudar a modificar algunas creencias erróneas, ya que no solo nos plantea preguntas, sino que también nos ofrece respuestas que nos permitirán entender la vida económica de los pobres en los países en desarrollo y cambiarán muchas percepciones sobre las políticas que deben ser promovidas para mejorar su situación.»

[REVIEW_RETELLING] José María Larrú, Universidad CEU San Pablo, [Revista de Economía Mundial](https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/866/86622169011.pdf) — «El libro es una lectura esencial de la literatura micro del desarrollo. No se teoriza sobre el tamaño del Estado o los fallos del mercado, no se construyen modelos “de despacho” cuyos supuestos irreales (o irrelevantes) ya casi invitan a no seguir leyendo.», «Además de incisivo y entretenido, el libro es un permanente reto intelectual que puede inspirar la agenda investigadora de los estudios del desarrollo en España»

Ann Mitchell, Profesora e Investigadora UCA, [Ensayos de Política Económica](https://repositorio.uca.edu.ar/bitstream/123456789/2032/1/resena-poor-economics-radical.pdf) — «En conclusión, aunque Banerjee y Duflo no ofrecen “una bala mágica” para erradicar la pobreza, muestran cómo –a través de la prueba, medición rigorosa de impacto y errorlogran avanzar en la construcción de un conjunto de políticas eficaces para combatir la pobreza.»

[REVIEW_RETELLING] Prof. Dr. Uwe Helmert, Sozialepidemiologe, [Socialnet](https://www.socialnet.de/rezensionen/18934.php) — «Aber man macht es sich mit Sicherheit zu leicht, wenn man von heimischen Sofa aus, mit den Bequemlichkeiten einer funktionierenden Wasser- und Gesundheitsversorgung im Rücken, über das Übel der Entmündigung und die Notwendigkeit, Verantwortung für das eigene Leben zu übernehmen, philosophiert. Profitieren wir im reichen Westen nicht ständig von den Vorteilen einer Bevormundung, die so allgegenwärtig ist, dass wir sie kaum bemerken?», «Den AutorInnen ist es sehr gut gelungen, durch ihre vielfältigen persönlichen Erkundungen und Diskussionen vor Ort zu veranschaulichen, wie wichtig es ist, mit den von extremer Armut Betroffenen in vielen Ländern zu sprechen, um zu verhindern, dass weiterhin weitab geplante Kapangnen zur Bekämpfung von Armut und Hunger in den ärmsten Ländern der Welt in einer Top-Down-Strategie lanciert werden, die sich sehr oft als relativ wirkungslos oder sogar kontraproduktiv erwiesen haben.»

Laura Cepeda Emiliani, Centro de Estudios Económicos Regionales Banco de la República, [Economía & Región](https://revistas.utb.edu.co/index.php/economiayregion/article/view/140/129) — «Teniendo esto en cuenta, y sin pretensiones de formular la siguiente gran teoría sobre el desarrollo (como ya lo hicieron con la geografía Jeffrey Sachs o con el no-intervencionismo William Easterly), Esther Duflo y Abhijit V. Banerjee, profesores de Economía de Mit , buscan convencernos de que es válido trasladar las explicaciones «grandes» a un segundo plano para pensar el desarrollo desde lo micro», «En parte gracias a esta labor, muchos de los resultados de sus investigaciones desmienten o cuestionan tajantemente los clichés a los que se suele reducir la condición de pobreza.», «Segundo, y no obstante lo anterior, en el libro solo se mencionan las evalua ciones aleatorias como método para encontrar soluciones a la pobreza. Si bien esta es la función del j pal , el lector siente que falta un reconocimiento a los avances muy grandes que se han hecho con otros métodos y desde otros campos.», «Sin embargo, mucho de lo dicho en el libro lo vienen diciendo estos mismos actores desde hace años, aunque sin una voz estructurada. Duflo y Banerjee deberían darles más crédito.», «Antes de abordar las conclusiones del libro, debe mencionarse algo que, más que una crítica, es una observación: los estudios reseñados son en su mayoría rea lizados en las zonas rurales de India y áfrica. Esto pone en duda su validez para zonas en desarrollo más urbanizadas, como América Latina.»

[REVIEW_RETELLING] Unbreen Qayyum, Pakistan Institute of Development Economics, Islamabad, [The Pakistan Development Review](https://thepdr.pk/pdr/index.php/pdr/article/viewFile/2564/2564) — «The book very effectively addresses the rationality behind the decision making process of the poor people», «Banerjee and Duflo are among the proponentsof microcreditand consider it as a big hope to eradicate poverty and misery.» (*прим. ред.* — вообще-то в книге противоречивое отношение к микрокредитованию), «In short, this book provides a new sense that call for a closerlookinto all these issues.»

A. P. Thirwall, Professor of Applied Economics, University of Kent, UK, [Journal of Development Studies](https://sci-hub.se/10.1080/00220388.2012.716217) — «The book has received much adulation and many prizes, and there is no doubt that the detail isfascinating, but the question remains: will it radically change attitudes and policies towards povertyreduction in poor countries? This is where doubts start to creep in. Apart from the fact that the resultsof many of the RCTs could have been predicted in advance, there are well-known limitations of suchtrials. First they do not address the general equilibrium effects, or secondary repercussions, of particularprogrammes.», «Second, the evaluation of a trial itself may cause both the treatment and comparison groups to alter their behaviour for the period of the experiment, leading to falseinferences. Third, it may be difficult to generalise from the results of RCTs because they are context specific.», «To make lifeeasier for the poor, the authors suggest subsidised migration of rural workers to the cities, but they do notthink through what the consequences might be.», «Rodrik (2012) argues in the same vein that micro anti-poverty programmes oftentreat the symptoms of poverty rather than their causes, and that poverty is best addressed not by helping thepoor to be better at what they are already doing but by getting them to do something different. Micro-development economists, he says, ‘need to recognise… that whilerandomised evaluations are tremendously useful, the utility of their results is often restricted by the narrowscope of their application’.», «What is still missing from the book, however, is a summary at the end, for each of the topics discussed, ofthe way forward. Which anti-poverty policies are most effective and which policies should be discarded?Some costing of alternative policies would also be useful. Despite the reservations raised,Poor Economicsisundoubtedly one of the most interesting and thought-provoking books to have been written in the field ofdevelopment economics for a long time.»

[BOOK_OR_AUTHOR_OR_CONCEPT_CRITICISM][REVIEW_LONG] Paul Lagneau-Ymonet, Université Paris-Dauphine, Institut de recherche interdisciplinaire en sciences sociales (Irisso), [Travail et Emploi](https://journals.openedition.org/travailemploi/6090) — «Abhijit V. Banerjee et Esther Duflo proposent surtout une économie attrayante: pragmatique plutôt qu’idéologique; claire plutôt qu’absconse, altruiste plutôt qu’aveugle aux plaies du monde.», «À la différence de certains de leurs collègues, les auteurs ou leurs collaborateurs collectent, traitent et interprètent des données de première main.», «L’absence de mise en garde, dans le livre, contre les limites de la démarche qu’il promeut, entretient ainsi la confusion entre efficacité (l’action est suivie d’effet), efficience (le rendement de ladite action) et une forme spécifique de causalité (la production de l’effet observé par cette action et celle-là seulement).», «En privant leurs lecteurs et lectrices des moyens d’exercer leur vigilance épistémologique, Esther Duflo et Abhijit V. Banerjee entretiennent la confusion entre conquête de la connaissance scientifique et satisfaction d’exigences technocratiques.», «Le rappel des conditions et limites de validité de la technique d’évaluation privilégiée par les auteurs n’épuise pas la critique, mais il révèle les biais qui faussent la perspective d’Esther Duflo et Abhijit V. Banerjee: la mise à distance de l’économie politique, le déni des rapports de pouvoir et le confinement dans l’individu de l’analyse des causes de son comportement», «La seconde caractéristique fixe les bornes conceptuelles et politiques de la lutte contre la pauvreté en envisageant la richesse de quelques-uns et la pauvreté de nombreux autres comme les conséquences nécessaires du fonctionnement ordinaire de la société.», «En outre, le déni de la politique et l’indifférence à l’histoire des techniques de gouvernement empêchent de penser l’aide aux pauvres comme un rapport de pouvoir. Or, l’économie du développement à la manière d’Abhijit V. Banerjee et Esther Duflo n’est possible que si les expérimentateurs dominent les sujets de leurs expériences (les cobayes mais aussi les administrateurs du dispositif évalué). Ce rapport de pouvoir n’a rien de personnel : il est inscrit dans le protocole expérimental et redoublé par le rapport d’assistance, sans parler de l’écart irréductible entre les positions sociales des cobayes, des enquêteurs locaux, des assistants de recherche expatriés et des universitaires cosmopolites qui les chapeautent.», «Et pourtant les actions de ces individus, mais plus encore la logique des univers dans lesquels ils occupent des positions de pouvoir affectent très certainement les conditions de vie des pauvres. Dès lors, le souci n’est pas que l’économie du développement que promeuvent Abhijit V. Banerjee et Esther Duflo ne permette pas de répondre à toutes les questions – à l’impossible nul n’est tenu – mais bien que son complet déploiement dépende d’un rapport de pouvoir asymétrique que les auteurs n’analysent pas, alors qu’il est pourtant constitutif des conditions d’administration de la preuve « expérimentale » et des conditions d’existence de celles et ceux qu’il s’agirait d’étudier et d’aide», «Ce faisant, ils élaborent une économie humaniste qui n’est pas tout à fait une science sociale. Ainsi s’explique sans doute le mélange déroutant entre empathie pour les personnes, minutie des observations collectées sur le terrain et usage exceptionnel des acquis de l’histoire, de l’anthropologie ou de la sociologie», «Sans doute Esther Duflo et Abhijit V. Banerjee ne peuvent pas être tenus responsables de toutes les évaluations aléatoires mal conçues, menées sans précaution ou de leurs mésusages. Pourtant, leur prosélytisme simplificateur promeut un mode de recherche qui escamote ses biais méthodologiques, ses partis pris politiques et ses limites théoriques. L’évaluation aléatoire n’est pas l’immaculé experimentum crucis que revendiquent les auteurs. Au contraire, la généralisation de cette façon d’évaluer les politiques à l’égard des populations démunies ou des agents les plus dominés de la société, revient à envisager ces mesures ou ces programmes non pas comme des droits individuels garantis par la collectivité, mais comme des secours particuliers toujours sujets à caution.»

Anne Osborn Krueger, Profesora de Economía Internacional en la Facultad de Estudios Internacionales Avanzados de la Universidad Johns Hopkins,  [Finanzas y desarrollo: publicación trimestral del Fondo Monetario Internacional y del Banco Mundial](https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/fandd/spa/2011/06/pdf/books.pdf) — «En esta importante obra, que tanto invita a la lectura, los padres intelectuales de las PCA, Abhijit Banerjee y Esther Duflo, sintetizan gran cantidad de resultados y extraen conclusiones para las políticas destinadas a eliminar la pobreza.», «Como los buenos empleos suelen estar en la ciudad, los autores recomiendan no solo crearlos (aunque no dicen cómo, más allá de exigir a los bancos conceder crédito a la mediana empresa), sino tam-bién subsidiar la migración hacia zonas urbanas. Dado que la mayoría de los lugares tienen más inmigrantes que bue-nos empleos, la dinámica macroeconó-mica de esta recomendación es dudosa.», «Bien implementados, muchos de los programas que propugnan Banerjee y Duflo serían innegablemente meritorios. Pero se plantean dos grandes interrogan-tes, y otros menores. Primero, ¿se pueden poner en práctica todas estas políticas dentro de un marco fiscal y macroeconó-mico estable? Si la respuesta es negativa, quedan sin respuesta las preguntas de siempre sobre las tasas de rendimiento relativas. Segundo, dado que hasta ahora los gobiernos, las organizaciones no gubernamentales y otros han fracasado en estos ámbitos, ¿se puede esperar que estas políticas se pongan en práctica sin caer en los mismos problemas (por ejemplo, que los ricos reciban el grueso de los beneficios y que pierda atractivo la docencia)?», «Banerjee y Duflo muestran fehacien-temente que hay grandes derroches en los programas actuales. Pero eso no prueba que de la noche a la mañana aparecerán doctores competentes ni que clausurar clínicas (desatendidas) liberará suficientes recursos como para financiar las recomendaciones de los autores.», «Y en algunos casos el problema es aún más marcado: una de las necesidades obvias de los países pobres es un sistema financiero que funcione mejor. Pero los autores propugnan ir en dirección contraria, canalizando más crédito hacia la mediana empresa (para crear buenos empleos) y el microfinanciamiento.», «Pero incluso cuando las recomendaciones parecen perfectamente razonables, es difícil decidir la cantidad en que se deben suministrar estos bienes públicos porque los recursos son limitados.», «El segundo gran interrogante es cómo ejecutar estas políticas. Los autores son muy conscientes de las fallas de los programas públicos para ayudar a los pobres. Pero a pesar de las recomenda-ciones meritorias (transparencia, mayor participación de la mujer en los órganos decisorios, por ejemplo) para encauzar el gasto hacia programas más eficaces, reconocen que el progreso será paulatino», «En suma, esta obra es de lectura obli-gatoria para todo interesado en los pobres de los países en desarrollo y las políticas destinadas a mejorar su situación. Los resultados de las PCA y las críticas de las políticas actuales son invalorables.», «Plasmar algunas de sus determinaciones en políticas mediante la redistribución de recursos indudablemente producirá importantes beneficios, pero conviene examinar el atractivo de muchas de sus conclusiones (sobre todo el racionamiento del crédito y los subsidios para seguros e inmigración), así como los factores de compensación, los costos relativos y las implicaciones macroeconómicas»

[REVIEW_LONG][REVIEW_SMASHER][REVIEW_HIGH_ERUDITION] Martin Ravallion, Development Research Group, World Bank, [Journal of Economic Literature](http://sarkoups.free.fr/ravallion12.pdf) — «and their beautifully written and accessible book, Poor Economics: A Radical Rethinking of the Way to Fight Global Poverty (Public Affairs 2011), is bound to attract wide interest», «Not everyone has greeted the develop ment randomistas with enthusiasm.2 Poor Economics pays little attention to the past critiques of RCTs,3 although the concerns that have been raised in the literature are important to assessing the book's vision for a new economics of poverty and policy.», «Rather, the critics have pointed out that experiments are rarely so clean in practice, such that a number of assumptions are needed to draw valid inferences about the experimental pop ulation, let alone valid policy inferences— including assumptions that are not required by nonexperimental studies», «More generally, the treatment and com parison groups are typically part of the same economy—trading in the same markets as well as being linked through shared political and social institutions—in which case spillover effects must be expected. General equilibrium effects are routinely ignored by the development randomistas», «Policymakers have also come to doubt the benefits of relying so much on RCTs, which can be frustratingly uninformative about the questions they face in making better policies for fighting poverty. As Heckman (1992, 218) puts it, in social settings RCTs "… may pro duce clear answers to the wrong question."», «But the randomistas surely exaggerate our ignorance about the efficacy of the things we do in the name of fighting poverty», «Then the RCTs discussed in this book are ethically worrying. Furthermore, the principle of "informed consent" does not seem to get much respect from the new developmental randomistas; clearly many people did not know that they were being experimented on (notable when it is groups, such as villages, that are randomized, rather than individuals). And there are even risks of doing real harm. For example, Banerjee and Duflo discuss one (non-J-PAL) experi ment on corruption in India that knowingly augmented the large number of drivers on Delhi's roads who clearly do not know much about how to drive properly.», «It is not clear that a research strategy that relies heavily on RCTs constitutes a "new way of doing economics," especially when one notes that the main inferential problems of the old way are still there, on top of some new concerns.», «uch better data for a representative sample. It is understand able that the authors wanted to give a "face to poor people" in a book such as this—to help (mostly well-heeled) readers realize that poor people are just like them, except poorer. But this is clearly not the "hard evi dence" that J-PAL has been advocating. Nor would it appear to meet the standards of rig orous qualitative and "mixed-method" work in the social sciences. At times, Banerjee and Duflo appear to raise their casual inter views and observations from their field work to a worryingly high inferential level.», «However, one wonders if the authors might have been too hasty. Are we to think that Shantarama's story is somehow typical of all developing countries?», «It is not always clear that the evidence presented supports the books conclusions. Apparently the reason Shantarama's younger kids were not in school was not because it cost too much», «These diverse country experiences offer hope for understanding why some countries do better against poverty than others. Readers will not find any discussion of this topic in Poor Economics. And it is not because of space limitations.», « So this "new way of doing economics" comes with severe restrictions on the types of ques tions economics can address.», «k. Banerjee and Duflo do discuss poverty traps, with a very nice nontechnical explanation early on in the book. However, we do not come to closure on the issue of whether poverty traps exist and the authors ignore much of the literature on the subject.», «Indeed, it is not clear that RCTs are par ticularly well suited to programs involving the types of commodities for which market failures are a concern, such as those with large spillover effects in production or con sumption.», «And they have chosen to work with some of the best NGOs, notably in India, where there is a variance in NGO quality. A small program run by the committed staff of a good NGO may well work very differently to an ostensibly similar program applied at scale by a government or other NGO», « Indeed, I can see no obvious reason why RCTs compen sate for the distortions generating existing, policy-relevant, knowledge gaps, stemming from the combination of decentralized decision making about project evaluation with the inevitable externalities in knowl edge generation», «Learning from RCTs raises a further con cern. Banerjee and Duflo tell us very little about the institutional-implementation factors that might make a given program a success in one place, or at one scale, but not another.», «The external validity of RCTs does not get adequate attention in this book», «More than once I felt Banerjee and Duflo were going too far in drawing broad lessons about the best "way to fight global poverty" from their field observations and experimen tal trials in specific settings. The risk is not only to current policy making, but also to the direction taken by future policy-oriented research.», «Any reasonably skeptical reader will no doubt wonder whether the scores can be trusted», «To some observ ers (me included) that vision seems absurdly ambitious. And it is clear from this book that J-PAL still has a long way to go.», «While this is not a book full of specific pol icy recommendations about how best to fight poverty, some do emerge. The importance of access to reliable public information comes out often (though some of the contingent fac tors in the efficacy of information programs might have got more attention). The authors also advocate free or subsidized distribution of certain goods and services with large pay offs (though they say little about how this is financed or how markets would respond)», «But please let us not neglect those deeper problems.»

[REVIEW_LONG][REVIEW_SMASHER] Sanjay G. Reddy, Department of Economics, The New School for Social Research, New York, [Review of Agrarian Studies](https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/308537/files/On%20Poor%20Economics.pdf) — «Few volumes in contemporary economics have been more lauded, and have summarised a zeitgeist, as much as Abhijit Banerjee and Esther Duflo’s Poor Economics», «The implicit premise of the book is that interventions that work in one place can be expected to work in another.», «There are reasons why it is not possible to discuss individual fates without taking note of the macro economy, history, culture, and politics. Alas, such concepts appear to play little role in the world-view of the randomisers.», «the result is a pianissimo of development economics that provokes in the reader who is at all aware of the broader canvas, an anxiety that a great many of the important questions are unasked. This book is reflective of the most prominent current of contemporary metropolitan development economics, and its prescriptions are both exemplar and example of the resulting limitations», «One may argue, in fact, that the style of metropolitan development economics celebrated in this book leads not so much to increasing rigour as to rigor mortis, by severely limiting the questions that can be asked and shoring up a practical philosophy that is quiescent in relation to many important questions that cannot readily be analysed using the authors’ favoured method.», «It has been widely recognised that the only questions that are amenable to being answered through randomised trials are very narrow ones, having to do with the responses of individuals or households to a well-defined “treatment.” All the questions that arise in the macroeconomic context (regarding national policies, for example), and many, if not most, of the important questions that arise in a meso or microeconomic context, cannot possibly be answered in such a way.», «Quite apart from the issues of econometric identification arising in any real context, and in no way secondary to them, are the ethical requirements of conducting a randomised trial. Strikingly, these considerations are not discussed at all in the book.», «The current boom in randomised trials in development economics, in contrast, has almost entirely involved experimentation on poor persons in poor countries. It is not implausible to argue that among these reasons is the relative disorganisation of poor people and poor communities, which makes it possible to experiment upon them without facing much resistance. It would very likely be politically unpalatable to provide a recognisable benefit randomly to middle-class or upper-class individuals or communities, and, at a minimum, to do so would involve complex political negotiation.», «The implicit philosophy of the authors of the book, and the broader constellation of like-minded economists, is based on the following premises. First, “what works” is simple, even deceptively simple. Hence, in common with the freakonomists, the randomistas reveal that there are counterintuitively straightforward answers to seemingly difficult problems arising in a complex world.», «Some may suggest that the authors of the book have a richer view of human motivation than many economists, who are still narrower. Still, their understanding of human psychology is simplistic. Although the authors draw on their field visits to motivate their informal narratives concerning individual responses to poverty», « the authors do little to validate a systematic role for other ways of knowing about the world (e.g. the ethnographic), ways that would give a window on the motivations of actors and their social interdependencies. The authors’ attitude to interpersonal and societal differences reflects what is often called “economic imperialism.”», «Tellingly, the book makes almost no reference to any economics literature other than the very recent and other than what has emanated from the charmed metropolitan circle (as represented by a small number of “leading” economics journals). Still less does it refer to contributions of the other social sciences, whether recent or historical.», «The book is concerned with the amelioration of individual distress, but pays little attention to the conditions of sustained and socially inclusive structural transformation of national economies except in so far as it views individual life improvement as bringing such change in train. In this sense, the authors are concerned with poverty but not with development.», «To the extent that they take a view of contextual and structural concerns, it is in the form of an implicit attitude toward contemporary market capitalism that is conformist rather than critical, and indeed does not dwell long on uncomfortable or difficult questions concerning the institutional setting of the intervention.», «The third discursive factor is the appeal of the “soundbite” – the simple and typically simplistic description or explanation that travels easily and can thus smoothly gain currency among policy entrepreneurs, power brokers, and well-meaning and interested laypersons.», «It is, perhaps, not too difficult to understand why the prescription of Poor Economicshas enjoyed as much circulation as it has, in particular among metropolitan development policy-making elites, although increasingly also elsewhere. It appeals to powerful but flawed metropolitan predispositions: a desire to “fix” things with simpleminded mono-causal reasoning, allied with the conviction that technology, through the analysis of data using randomised trials, makes it possible to do so. Its technocratic premises, its naïve view of politics and society, and its unselfconscious do-goodism make for a self-affirming picture of the world. It is unfortunate that it does so little to explain it.»

[REVIEW_LONG] Mark R. Rozenzweig, Yale University, [Journal of Economic Literature](https://sci-hub.se/10.2307/23269973) — «And the book well reflects many aspects of the new research, encompassing scores of studies using a variety of empirical methods, not just those employing randomized field experiments», «By focusing on assisting the poor on the margin, of course, the book is missing analyses of circumstances where and when there was real poverty reduction—substan tial increases in the number of people who become nonpoor.», «Thus the book is missing, for example, a comprehensive analysis of the "green revo lution" in India, which helped to raise the real wages of the poorest of the poor more than threefold over three decades», «No intervention described in the book has anything near that effect on incomes. Studies of migration, occupational mobility, the growth of manufacturing sectors employing large numbers of formerly poor persons (e.g., the Bangladesh garment sector), major routes to the escape of poverty, are also absent», «The message that economic science and money (aid) can be combined to directly help the poor, even in corrupt and/or  dysfunctional political regimes and in the absence of grand strategies or major techno logical breakthroughs, is of obvious appeal to altruistic billionaires, aid agencies, charitable NGOs, and dewy-eyed college economics majors who see that they can both do good and learn in exotic locales.», «Should a researcher who, for exam ple, is not impressed by studies rejecting the hypothesis that lowering prices to zero decreases the use of a product conditional on preferences (as apparently is believed by donors) read this book to learn about what is going on in the field of development eco nomics? The answer is certainly yes.», «But there is an important caveat—the book is not a critical review of the literature. Qualitative and quantitative findings are reported, but the methods (apart from randomized trials) and shortcomings of each study are not provided, and some times critical details are omitted.», «atory goal. Readers interested in or even wowed by particular quantitative findings should be skeptical and consult the original studies, as we will see.», «The chapter on family size, other than its recognition of the fact that family size choices are motivated by con straints and returns, is the weakest chapter in the book. This is in part due to the lack of compelling evidence. But also the studies the authors do give credence to on the effects of family size on schooling outcomes, which show weak effects, or on savings, which show strong effects, are based on dubious assumptions», «The chapter on saving contains a brilliant and balanced anal ysis of why the poor do not save when it is in their own interest.», «Authors recommend subsidizing bed nets, which may be cheaper than information campaigns and may be justified by externali ties. But they never consider the alternative, proven method of malaria eradication, using insecticides or swamp removal and other methods, which would obviate the need for information campaigns or behavioral nudges and not impose any direct costs on the poor.», «The reality is many of the quantitative effects on schooling of the programs or inter ventions discussed in Poor Economics are very small in absolute terms. However, there is a tendency to oversell the small gains, in part by using percentages and in part by using positive adjectives and adverbs.», «The Indonesian INPRES program, the largest school building pro gram in the history of the world, is called a "great success," but that program was esti mated to have increased schooling by 0.13 years (Duflo 2001)», «What is deemed a big or small effect by the authors seems inconsistent.», «Thus farmers may have been less impressed than the investigators with the single experimen tal result, given their knowledge of weather variability, even if the experimental outcome was measured in a normal weather year», «In particular, a study is cited finding that a per son who is malaria-free for the first twenty years of life compared to someone who is not earns a 50 percent wage premium. (…) Inspection of the cited study (Bleakley 2010) reveals that actual earnings were not mea sured at all, rather the outcome variable is an index of earnings based on reported occu pation weighted by the occupation-earnings structure in a particular year.», «Farmers were almost one-half the labor force in 1880 and 12.2 percent of the labor force in 1950. Thus a large part of the measured change in earnings over the period is due to the escape from farming, and none from how the eradication of malaria changed the actual incomes of farmers», «The other finding, highly promoted in the book, is from a recent unpublished study examining the adult earnings of school-age children that were subject to a deworming experiment. (…) This was despite that fact that the effect of the program on schooling achievement was zero. (…) However, in this study the wage effects reported are only for workers who earned a wage in the month prior to the survey, and over three fourths of the sample did not report a wage. (…) but perhaps more aptly here, one must consider whether the deworming find ing is simply a "fluke"», «The strongest parts of the book are where the authors take heed of the popular premise that a route to alleviating poverty is through the development of microenteiprises.», «The case for subsidizing education is actually not well made in the book», «But the major reason that education subsidies could be justified is the standard commitment problem that children cannot credibly prom ise to repay parents for their educational sacrifices (despite guilt) and learning externalities.», «On its own terms, if there is a weakness of the book, apart from the overexuberance about some program effects, it is the lack of a coherent scientific research agenda. The authors indicate that they believe that small research increments together can build up a body of knowledge useful to fulfill their humanitarian goals, but offer no guidance for pursuing the next small steps.», «With respect to any immediate policy inferences, most of the evidence discussed is based on scientifically sound but one-off studies from different countries of particular interventions. This is a young research pro gram. There is reason therefore to be skepti cal, just as the authors suggest the poor are, about the "supposed opportunities" suggested by any one study. Do we need more replications of prior studies in different contexts.», «Despite these limitations, ultimately Poor Economics does a masterful job of illuminat ing, using both research findings and personal experiences, just how complex and challeng ing are the lives of the poor.», «Thinking small may or may not have large future payoffs for the poor, but it has surely already done some good»

[REVIEW_SMASHER][REVIEW_LONG] Seyed Hossein Mirjalili, Associate Professor of Economics, Institute for Humanities and Cultural Studies, [پ  ژوهش‌نامه انتقادی متون و برنامه‌های علوم انسانی ](http://criticalstudy.ihcs.ac.ir/article_4830_dbd688f78a0408e922459223e03cd5d7.pdf) — «ه‌رغم آن‌که کتاب روش نوینی برای مبارزه با فقر ارائه کرده است. ارزیابی کتاب نشان می‌دهد که به محدودیت‌های روش آزمایش کنترل تصادفی توجه نشده است. بهبود عملکرد فقرا بدون اصلاحات نهادی تأثیر محدودی دارد. به‌ویژه اگر در دام فقر گرفتار شده باشند. برای هشت موضوع بحث‌شده نتیجه گیری و پیش‌نهاد ادامة بررسی ارائه نشده است. با اقدامات مارجینال که این کتاب برای بهبود زند گی فقرا مطرح می‌کند. نمی توان مشکل فقر حدود دو میلیارد نفر در جهان را حل کرد. تجربه کشورهای موفق در کاهش فقر با استفاده از این روش ارائه نشده است. از تأثیر فرهنگ بر انگیزه و رفتار فقرا بحشی نشده است درحالی که فقیران از باورها و هنجارهای فرهنگی تأثیر زیادی می‌پدذبرند  » , «زنظر ثروال (۲۰۱۲) در این مورد تردید وجود دارد که کتاب اقتصاد فقیر نگرش‌هاو سیاست‌های کاهش فقر در کشورهای فقیر را تغییر دهد. نتایج بسیاری از آزمایش‌های کنترل تصادفی ذکرشده در کتاب می‌توانست از قبل پیش‌بینی شود. به‌نظر می‌رسد مولفان کتاب اقتصاد فقیر به محدودیت‌های آزمایش‌های کنترل تصادفی توجه نکرده‌اند. کتاب پر از نتایج آزمایش‌ها مطالعات موردیء و حکایات است و مشخص نیست که جه‌جیزی برای مبارزه با فقر نتیجه‌بخش است و چه‌چیزی نتبجه‌بخش نیست تا افراد را از فقر بیرون بیاورد », «تاب اقتصاد فقفیر فاقد خلاصه‌ای در انتها برای هریک از موضوعات بحث‌شده برای راه پیش‌رو است. در کتاب مشخص نشده که کدام‌یک از سیاست‌های مبارزه با فقر موثرتر است و کدام سياست‌ها باید کنار گذاشته شود », «اب افتصاد قفیر فاقد تحلیل شرایطی است که کجا و چه‌موقع این روش کاهش فقر در عمل وجو  اشته است. قابل‌درک نیست که چگونه می‌توان با مطالعة زندگی کسانی‌که از فقر نجات نیافته‌اند فقر را از بین برد », «م‌چنین. به‌رغم این که بسیاری از مداخلات و مطالعات ذکرشده در کتاب افتصاد فقیر از هندوستان است. ولی فاقد تحلیل جامع از «انقلاب سبز» در هند است که به بیش از سهبرایرشدن دست‌مزد واقعی فقیرترین افراد طی سه دهه کمک کرد », «یچ مداخله‌ای در کتاب اقتصاد فقیر ذکر نشده که اثری بر درآمد فقرا داشته است. مانند مهاجرت. تحرک شغلی. و رشد بخش‌های صنعتی که افراد زیادی را به‌کار می‌گیرد که فلا فقیر بودند. مانند بخش یوشاک بنگلادش. این‌ها راه‌های رهایی از فقر است که در کتاب اقتصاد فقیر بحثی نشده است  », «ل مربوط به اندازه خانواده. به‌دلیل فقدان شواهد قانع‌کننده. ضعیف‌ترین فصل کتاب اقتصاد ففیر است. قوی‌ترین قسمت‌های کتاب اقتصاد فقیر آن‌حاست که نویسندگان می‌گویند که راه کاهش فقر ازطریق توسعهٌ شرکت‌های کوچک است. », «یاری از خدمات. طرح‌ها. و پارانه‌های پیش‌نهادی توسط نویسندگان برای تفکر کوچک مناسب است. هدف تفکر کوچک کمک مارجینال به فقیران برای مقابله با فقر بدون کاهش تعداد فقراست  », «گان معتقدند که افزوده‌های تحقیقاتی کوحک با هم می‌تواند پیکره‌ای از دانش ایجاد کند که مفید است. اما هیچ راه‌نمایی  », «اوالیون (۲۰۱۲) در نقد کتاب اقتصاد فقیر می‌گوید که توصیه‌های سیاستی مولفان مستلزم اصلاحات کوچک و مارجینال است. در کتاب اقتصاد فقیر نوع شواهد استفاده‌شده در سیاست گذاری و نوع سوال‌های پرسیده شده محل بحث است  », «ولفان کتاب افتصاد فقیر تحت‌تأثیر انواع شواهد ازجمله مشاهدات اتفاقی مربوط به افراد یا خانواده‌هایی بودند که آن‌ها را ملاقات کردند. این نوعی کار کیفی غیررسمی است. اغلب شواهد ارائه‌شده در کتاب افتصاد فقیر «شواهد قوی» نیست و استانداردهای روش آميخته کمی و کیفی دقیق در علوم اجتماعی را ندارد. به‌نظر می‌رسد مولفان مصاحبه‌های اتفاقی و مشاهدات خود از کار میدانی را به سطح بالای استنتاج افزایش داده‌اند.», «حثی درمورد تجربه کشورها در مبارزه با فقر در کتاب اقتصاد فقیر نشده است  », «ه‌نظر می‌رسد آن‌چه در آزمایش‌های کنترل تصادفی انجام نمی‌شود این است که دوباره به افراد فقیر با زگردند و صحبت کنند برای بررسی این که ایا توضیحات  نها درست است يا نه. فقرا آگاهی‌دهنده به آزمایش‌ها هستند و نه داور نهایی, », «قدهای دیگر درمورد آزمایش‌های کنترل تصادفی عبارت‌اند از: اولأ آزمایش‌های کتترل تصادفی به ارات تعادل عمومی يا پی‌آمدهای برنامه‌ها نمی‌پردازند؛ ثانی؛ آزمون ممکن است باعث شود که گروه‌های اصلی و گروه مقایسه رفتار خود را در دورة آزمایش تغییر دهند و به نتیجه‌گیری کاذب منجر شود؛ ثالثا تعمیم نتایج آزمایش‌های کنترل تصادفی مشکل است. شود. », «انرات شود و روستای دیگر در همان منطقه مداخحله نشود و این را مردم بدانند» دولت محلی همان اقتصاد است که درهرصورت اثرات سرایتی انتظار می‌رود. نقد دیگر به آزمایش‌های کنترل تصادفی این است که اثرات تعادل عمومی معمولاً د  زمایش‌های کنترل تصادفی توسعه نادیده گرفته می‌شود », «قد دیگر این است که تورش انتخاب در آزمایش‌های کنترل تصادفی وجود دارد. افراد انتخاب عقلانی انجام می‌دهند درمورد این که یا در یک آزمایش شرکت کنند یانه؟ و انتخاب‌هایشان براساس چیزهایی است که آن‌ها می‌دانند و ما نمی‌دانيم. دراین‌صورت. براوردکننده متغیرهای ابزاری تخمین سازگار از میانگین تأثیرات علت و معلولی ارائه نمی‌کند. حتی زمانی که تعبین آن تصادفی است. », «رای پاسخ به همه این سوالات. فروض قوی‌تر و مدل‌سازی نیاز است. بنابراین» درمورد کارایی آزمایش کنترل تصادفی برای مبارزه با فقر اغراق شده است (هکمن ۱۹۹۲: ۲۱۸)», «کی از تورش‌های آزمایش‌های کنترل تصادفی این است که محفقان با سازمان‌های غیردولتی کار می‌کنند نه دولت‌ها. کیفیت سازمان‌های غیردولتی متفاوت است. برنامه کوچک انجام‌شده توسط کارکنان متعهد یک سازمان غیردولتی. که خوب و کارامد انجام‌شده ممکن است با برنامهٌ مشابه که در مقیاس وسیع‌تر توسط دولت پا سایر سازمان‌های غیردولتی اجرا شده متفاوت باشد. », «زمایش‌های کنترل تصادفی متغیرهای مشاهده‌نشده را درنظر نمی گيرند. هم‌چنین تعمیم به فراتر از محیط ازمایش که در ان مشاهده نشده محل تردید است. », «مولفان درمورد عوامل نهادی که ممکن است یک برنامه مشخص را در یک مکان موفق کند. اما در مکان دیگر ناموفق. توضیح نمی‌دهند », «فلت از نقش فرهنگ: در کتاب اقتصاد فقیر ذکری از نقش فرهنگ در شکل‌دهی به انگیزه‌ها و رفتارهای فقرا نشده است. درحالی که فقرا از باورها و هنجارهای فرهنگی تأثیر زیادی می‌پذیرند », «مولفان درمورد عوامل نهادی که ممکن است یک برنامه مشخص را در یک مکان موفق کند. اما در مکان دیگر ناموفق. توضیح نمی‌دهند », «تاب اقتصاد فقیر بازاندیشی رادیکال در مبارزه با فقر جهانی نیست: », «قلمرو محدود اثربخشی ارزیابی تصادفی: ازنظر رودریک (2008) برنامه‌های کوچک مبارزه با فقر به‌جای درمان علل فقر اغلب علائم فقر را درمان می‌کنند.», «نادیده‌گرفتن دام فقر : اگر دام فقر وجود داشته باشد. تمرکز بر دستاوردهای کوچحک آزمایش‌های کنترل تصادفی برای فقیران ممکن است وضم فقیران را خیلی بهتر نکند. درصورت وحود دام فقر افراد فقیر در تعادل سطح پایین گیر کرده‌اند و افزایش بزرگی لازم است که آن‌ها بیرون آورده شوند. زیرا شکاف دست‌مزد بین فقرا و ثروت‌مندان آن‌قدر زیاد است که اقدامات کتاب اقتصاد فقیر کارساز نیست. », «ا این معیار هیچ‌کدام از روش‌های بحث‌شده در کتاب اقتصاد فقير اقدام مژثری برای خروج از دام فقر نیست. فکرکردن بزرگ درواقع پیداکردن محدودیت‌های کلیدی است که مانع حروح از دام فقراست. مقیاس فقر در جهان آن‌قدر بزرگ است که نمی‌توان به را‌حل‌های کوچک بسنده کرد.»

[REVIEW_PERSONAL_COMMENTS] «ویسندگان معتقدند باید اصلاحات بزرگ نهادی را کنار گذاشت و به‌دنبال بهبودهای مارجینال برای فقرا بود. مولفان گفته‌اند که به‌جای تمرکز بر تغییر کلی يا ایجاد نهادها باید به اصلاحات جزئی پرداخت. » — я не припомню, чтобы авторы книги утверждали о необходимости отказаться от крупных институциональных реформ; что незначительные реформы необходимы «вместо» институциональных изменений

[REVIEW_NO_ACCESS] Anna Charpentier, Dominique Meurs, [Population (French Edition)](https://www.jstor.org/stable/23391712)

[ADDITIONAL_READING] Абхиджит Банерджи, Эстер Дюфло — «Экономическая наука в тяжёлые времена. Продуманные решения самых важных проблем современности»

Abhijit Vinayak Banerjee, Dilip Mookherjee, Roland Benabou (editors) — «Understanding Poverty»

Уильям Истерли — «Тирания экспертов. Экономисты, диктаторы и забытые права бедных»

Уильям Истерли — «В поисках роста. Приключения и злоключения экономистов в тропиках»

Jessica Cohen, William Easterly (edited by) — «What Works in Development?: Thinking Big and Thinking Small»

Thomas Carothers, Diane De Gramont — «Development Aid Confronts Politics: The Almost Revolution»

Daryl Collins, Jonathan Morduch, Stuart Rutherford, Orlanda Ruthven — «Portfolios of the Poor: How the World's Poor Live on $2 a Day»

Nicolas Brisset — «Economics and performativity exploring limits, theories and cases»

Marcel Boumans — «Science Outside the Laboratory: Measurement in Field Science and Economics»

Andrew Leigh — «Randomistas: How Radical Researchers Are Changing Our World»

Martin Ravallion — «Poverty Comparisons»

Philip N. Jefferson (edited by) — «The Oxford Handbook of the Economics of Poverty»

Дэни Родрик — «Экономика решает: сила и слабость мрачной науки»

Dany Rodrick — «One Economics, Many Recipes: Globalization, Institutions, and Economic Growth»

Dany Rodrick, Mark R. Rozenzweig (edited by) — «Handbook of development economics.»

Ангус Дитон — «Великий побег: Здоровье, богатство и истоки неравенства.»

Florent Bédécarrats, Isabelle Guérin, François Roubaud — «Randomized Control Trials in the Field of Development: A Critical Perspective»

Сакс Джеффри — «Конец бедности. Экономические возможности нашего времени»

Alice O’Connor — «Poverty Knowledge: Social Science, Social Policy, and the Poor in Twentieth-Century U.S. History»

A. P. Thirwall, Penélope Pacheco-López — «Economics of Development: Theory and Evidence»

Paul Collier — «The Bottom Billion: Why the Poorest Countries are Failing and What Can Be Done About It»

[NO_SCEDRECO] -->
1. Banerjee Abhijit Vinayak, Duflo Esther — Poor Economics. A Radical Rethinking of the Way to Fight Global Poverty (PublicAffairs, 2011).pdf

<a id="Благополучие-и-счастье"></a>
# Благополучие и счастье

<a id="Мифы-о-счастье"></a>
## Мифы о счастье

<a id="Мифы-о-счастье-или-несчастье-при-наступлении-определённых-событий"></a>
### Мифы о счастье или несчастье при наступлении определённых событий

<!--- [Is/Mass]

[ACADEMIC_DEGREE] «Ph.D., Social Psychology, Stanford University, 1994» — http://sonjalyubomirsky.com/files/2012/09/Lyubomirsky-CV.pdf 

[Автор](http://sonjalyubomirsky.com/files/2012/09/Lyubomirsky-CV.pdf).

[POSITIVE_OR_NEUTRAL_REVIEW] Patrick R. Heck, Department of Cognitive, Linguistic & Psychological Sciences, Brown University; Krueger Joachim I., [The American Journal of Psychology](https://www.academia.edu/download/52764292/LyubomirskyReview2014.pdf) — «Indeed, as Lyubomirsky argues, it appears as though a person’s support network, optimistic disposition, and active engagement are bet-ter predictors of happiness», «Perhaps these tools, purported to allow people to increase mean levels of happiness, should include the Parduccian notion of range manipulation in order to provide an additional element of control over one’s own distribution of experiences»

[BOOK_OR_AUTHOR_OR_CONCEPT_CRITICISM] Ad Bergsma, [J Happiness Stud](https://www.academia.edu/download/63306873/2014__The_mythycal_myths_of_Happiness20200514-37259-t8puwt.pdf) — «Lyubomirsky favors making important life decisions basedon a rational analysis, but in my mind this is an impossible ideal to achieve, becausewe can never know all the relevant facts, especially about an unknown future. One problem is that the empirical studies Lyubomirsky refers to might or might not be validfor individual circumstances.», «Knowledge drawn from empirical happiness studies are not ‘good enough’ for personaldecisions. In happiness studies, the empirical generalizations deal with short-term effectsof decisions, but the long term-effects are usually unknown.», «Having children regularlycomes at the cost of reduced happiness because of the loss of sleep and the stress involved(e.g. Pouwels2011), but less is known about the long-term impact and consequences of having children, for example whether you will be blessed (or burdened) with having grandchildren or not. Knowing the facts does not relieve people from the burden ofweighing up the uncertainties, before they make any lasting decisions.», «I think it is more accurate to think of happiness as a wickedproblem, one that is characterized by a complex set of interdependencies. Solving one partof the puzzle may have unexpected consequences for others parts of this problem (Ritteland Webber 1973).», «A strong feature of the book is that it offers a tremendous amount of adequate studysummaries. Lyubomirsky really loves science and her passion carries over to the readers.», «The advice is solid, but I think her statements about the toxic myth of lasting maritalbliss are overdone.», «but the idea that these myths are very important orharmful in our society is not backed up with references or empirical facts», «Again Lyubomirsky is a bit too enthusiastic about the studies she describes, and uses the enthusiasm of a self-help guru to bring this across.», «There is a paucity of data from empirical happiness intervention studies thatspecifically deal with people that are broke. As a result, even for the best researcher it isimpossible to give evidence based advise that is tailored for different personalities andspecific life circumstances», «My major problem with the book is that the distinction between intellectual knowledge and practical wisdom is ignored (Ardelt 2000). Reading the latest scientific studies will notnecessarily offer you the required ‘expertise in the conduct and meaning of life’, to borrowpart of a wisdom definition (Baltes and Staudinger 2000, p. 124).», «Therefore I am ambivalent when thinking about recommending The Myths of Happiness to lay persons. It does offer excellent andrelevant information about happiness research, but it requires quite some effort form thereader to put all this knowledge into perspective»

[NOTE_FULL_NAME] Lyubomirsky Sonja — The myths of happiness꞉ what should make you happy but doesn’t, what shouldn’t make you happy but does (The Penguin Press, 2013)

[ADDITIONAL_READING] Барри Шварц, Кеннет Шарп — «Практическая мудрость»

Барри Шварц — «Парадокс выбора»

Дэвид Гилберт — «Спотыкаясь о счастье»

Luke Hockley, Nadi Fadina — «The Happiness Illusion: How the media sold us a fairytale»

Чиксентмихайи Михай — «Поток: Психология оптимального переживания»

Michael A. Bishop — «The Good Life. Unifying the Philosophy and Psychology of Well-Being»

Lorraine L. Besser — «The Philosophy of Happiness: An Interdisciplinary Introduction»

John Kekes — «Enjoyment: the moral significance of styles of life»

Neera K. Badhwar — «Well-Being: Happiness in a Worthwhile Life»

[NO_SCEDRECO] -->
1. Lyubomirsky Sonja — The myths of happiness (The Penguin Press, 2013).pdf

<a id="Нейронауки-о-счастье"></a>
## Нейронауки о счастье

<a id="Социальные-детерминанты-химического-счастья-мозга"></a>
### Социальные детерминанты химического счастья мозга

<!--- [NO_PDF] -->
1. Бернетт Дин — Счастливый мозг. Как работает мозг и откуда берётся счастье (Эксмо, 2019).fb2

<a id="Позитивная-психология-счастья"></a>
## Позитивная психология счастья

<a id="Пирог-счастья"></a>
### Пирог счастья

<a id="40-процентное-решение"></a>
#### 40-процентное решение

<!--- [CRIM_BESTSELLER]

[ACADEMIC_DEGREE] «Ph.D., Social Psychology, Stanford University, 1994» — http://sonjalyubomirsky.com/files/2012/09/Lyubomirsky-CV.pdf 

[Автор](http://sonjalyubomirsky.com/files/2012/09/Lyubomirsky-CV.pdf).

[POSITIVE_OR_NEUTRAL_REVIEW][REVIEW_RETELLING][REVIEW_HIGH_POSITIVE] Alex Linley, PhD Director, Centre for Applied Positive Psychology, UK — https://sci-hub.se/10.1080/17521880701878182 — «First, unlike almost any other book on how to be happy, thisone is based on scientifically tested analyses of that very question. Second, unlikeother authors who often just review other people’s work and put their owninterpretation on it, Lyubomirsky is a leading happiness researcher in her ownright.», «With extensive notes detailing the hundreds of researchstudies on which it is based, Lyubomirsky strikes a crucial balance between beingreadable but also eminently evidence-based, and indeed more evidence-based thanany other happiness book I have ever read, another feature distinguishing this volume from its many competitors.», «If happiness is important to you, whether your own, your clients’ or your children’s, then read this book.»

Keaton West, the Coordinator for Student Transition Programs at the University of West Florida — https://pubs.lib.umn.edu/index.php/jcotr/article/download/2883/2291 — «If selected as a common reading program book, The How of Happiness would be an excellent tool for college students, as well as faculty and staff.», «As a note to those selecting common reading program books, this book has a religious tone at times, but provides insight from several religious perspectives as well as discussions of morals and philosophy.», «The How of Happiness is a book selection that could be incorporated into different courses and various disciplines. This reading selection would be an impactful and positive addition to a first-year psychology or human science course due to the information and studies regarding psychology.»

Aditya Shukla, Master of Arts in Clinical Psychology ( https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Aditya-Shukla-7 ), Shachi Krishan — https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Aditya-Shukla-7/publication/316092255_The_How_of_Happiness_A_New_Approach_to_Getting_the_Life_You_Want_Book_review/links/58effcab0f7e9b6f82dbcf8c/The-How-of-Happiness-A-New-Approach-to-Getting-the-Life-You-Want-Book-review.pdf — «The book is convincing with its approach and the provided evidence but it isn’t devoid of limitations. Most of the provided research relies on ‘self-reports’. This may not always accurately portray the truth. It cannot be an assumption that the general population isexpert at introspection. Research suggests that many self-reports aren’t representative of reality. Not enough neuro-scientific evidence is provided which bolsters the psychological theories. What people consider true may not be true owing to confounding variables, self-fulfilling prophecies, cognitive biases and unique perception of concepts.», «God-fearing may also lead to a facade of happiness where the happiness is portrayed at the social level while maintaining an internal conflict in the form of intrusive thoughts. These issues are poorly addressed in the book.», «It is strikingly noted that the strategies described are not very different from, at least in principle, the commonplace suggestions we make to our dear ones. For example, meditate every day, try putting on a smiling face, show gratitude whenever you can, formulate goals and commit to them sincerely, etc.», «Although, the nature of the book’s recommendations may at first seem jejune, the evidence is compelling and largely reliable.», «The exhaustive nature of provided evidence is sufficient for the reader to be enthralled and adopt most recommendations right away. The author seems to have done an impeccable job in grounding happiness in the psychological sciences.»

[REVIEW_HIGH_ERUDITION][REVIEW_ANOTHER] Herbert Schaaf — https://wug.akwien.at/WUG_Archiv/2009_35_1/2009_35_1_0126.pdf — «Alleine eine Veränderung auf der je-weils persönlichen Ebene ist aber kei-neswegs hinreichend, auch in Politik und Wirtschaft müssen die relevanten Zusammenhänge erkannt und in ent-sprechende Handlungsansätze umge-münzt werden.», «Während die Glücksforschung in der Vergangenheit häufiger eher belächelt oder in eine mehr oder weniger esote-rische Ecke abgeschoben wurde, zei-gen u. a. das hier besprochene Buch und die Vielzahl der lesenswerten Neuerscheinungen zum Thema, dass diesbezügliche Überlegungen zumin-dest einen Teilbeitrag zur Krisenbewäl-tigung leisten können» (*прим. авт. В этой рецензии автор, в основном, рассуждает об экономике счастья*)

[REVIEW_RETELLING] Karsten Abel, Cand. Psych. Aut — https://www.kognitiv.dk/upload/31._s%C3%A5dan_bliver_du_lykkelig_af_karsten_abel_-_november_18.pdf — «Der findes mange holdninger til selvhjælpsbøger og specielt til en der er lyserød og pastel grøn og oven i købet med en titel som en artikel i et dameblad.Hvis dette ikke skræmmer dig, så er bogen bestemt værd at læse -uden dog at være en mirakelkur.»

[REVIEW_RETELLING] Diego Gómez Baya — [Erebea](http://rabida.uhu.es/dspace/bitstream/handle/10272/7280/La_ciencia_de_la_felicidad.pdf) — «Así pues, este libro titulado “La ciencia de la felicidad: un método probado para conseguir el bienestar” supone un breve y entretenido manual lleno de acti-vidades, todas ellas respaldadas empíricamente, para ayudarnos a ser más felices, escrito de forma sencilla y motivadora.»

[REVIEW_RETELLING] Dr. Bozsár Gabriella — https://www.epa.hu/02300/02303/00001/pdf/EPA-02303_M_Coachszemle_2012_89.pdf — «A szerző módszereket is ajánl – elárulom: egyik élvezetesebb, mint a másik–, de ezt már a könyvből kell kiolvasnod, kedves olvasó.»

[BOOK_OR_AUTHOR_OR_CONCEPT_CRITICISM][REVIEW_HIGH_ERUDITION] Ad Bergsma, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, The Netherlands — https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10902-010-9200-3 — «I intend to be a little more cynical. I will regard Lyubomirsky’s book as the state of the art in popular advice about happiness, and try to assess how far we have come. In general I agree that Lyubomirsky’s book is about as good as it gets, but still it leaves a lot to be desired.», «The How of Happiness has set a new standard in happiness advice», «The first reason to doubt is that although many of the recommendations are evidence-based, this is not true for the whole of the work. In essence it remains an untested self-help manuscript.», «However, the test she presents is only used in empirical research to compare two happiness strategies: expressing gratitude and cultivating optimism.», «The self-test does not meet the standard that Lyubomirsky describes in the first pages in the book, when she remarks that only double-blind experimentation offers the kind of knowledge to be trusted enough to decide whether a claim is true.», «In addition to that one can wonder how effective any evidence-based approach, like the one advocated by Lyubomirsky, will be.», «Therefore I would not dare to bet that Lyubomirskys book will be more effective than, for example, Michael Fordyce’s happiness program, made at a time when happiness research was still a marginal activity (1977, 1983).», «There is even room for doubt whether the New Age self-help books, that Gilbert so despises, are less effective than Lyubomirsky’s book. (…) Lyubomirsky’s advice is limited by the scientific method, but I do not know if this yields superior results for readers, as Gilbert suggests.», «This line of thinking is startlingly difficult. What does it mean if forty percent of my happiness is the result of intentional activity? This 40 percent thesis is also bound to lead to misunderstandings.», «If individuals with a violent and abusing partner take the message about the forty percent thesis literally, they should decide to think lovely thoughts about their partners and put more effort in their relationship, because the circumstances of life are rather insignificant. In practice readers will probably not make this mistake, but the reader is left in the dark regarding the question what exactly are circumstances, and when it is better to change or to accept them.», «Sensationalism is to be avoided in such statements. The limitations, as well as the benefits of a self-help therapy should be clearly stated. It is questionable if Lyubomirsky completely lives up to this recommendation.», «I would certainly recommend Lyubomirsky’s book to people who are looking for a self-help book on happiness, but I would also tell them to be aware of potential pitfalls, even though they may be insignificant for most.»

[ADDITIONAL_READING] Ad Bergsma — «En ze leefden nog lang, gevaarlijk en gelukkig»

Onno Hamburger, Ad Bergsma — «Happiness at Work Improve Your Self-leadership Skills to Flourish at Work»

Ad Bergsma, Onno Hamburger, Erwin Klappe — «Handboek werkgeluk»

Джонатан Хайдт — «Стакан всегда наполовину полон»

Ingrid Brdar — «The Human Pursuit of Well-Being: A Cultural Approach»

Andrew E Clark, Sarah Fleche, Richard Layard, Nattavudh Powdthavee, George Ward — «The Origins of Happiness: The Science of Well-Being Over the Life Course»

Ruut Veenhoven — «Conditions of Happiness»

Schaaf Herbert and etc. — «Ökonomie und Glück: Beiträge zu einer Wirtschaftslehre des guten Lebens»

Eric Weiner — «The Geography of Bliss: One Grump's Search for the Happiest Places in the World»

Dagmar Fenner — «Glück»

Лэйард Ричард — «Счастье꞉ уроки новой науки»

Beate Hentschel, Gisela Staupe — «Glück — welches Glück»

Theodor Leiber — «Glück, Moral und Liebe»

Darrin M McMahon — «Happiness: A History»

Mark Anielski — «The Economics of Happiness»

Gunter Dueck — «Abschied vom Homo Oeconomicus. Warum wir eine neue ökonomische Vernunft brauchen»

Stefan Klein — «Die Glucksformel»

Mathias Binswanger — «Die Tretmühlen des Glücks - Wir haben immer mehr und werden nicht glücklicher. Was können wir tun?»

[NO_SCANNED_PDF] -->
1. Любомирски Соня — Психология счастья. Новый подход (Питер, 2014).fb2

<a id="Закон"></a>
# Закон

<a id="Восстановительное-правосудие"></a>
## Восстановительное правосудие

<a id="Восстановительная-медиация-и-возможности-её-применения-в-России"></a>
### Восстановительная медиация и возможности её применения в России

<!--- [ACADEMIC_DEGREE] «Кандидат психологических наук: специальность 19.00.01 «Общая психология, психология личности, история психологии. Доцент факультета права департамента систем судопроизводства и уголовного права» — https://www.hse.ru/org/persons/62190565

[AUTHOR_PROJECT] Общественный центр «Судебно-правовая реформа» — http://sprc.ru/

[ADDITIONAL_READING] Нильс Кристи — «Пределы наказания», «Приемлемое количество преступлений»

Зер Ховард — «Восстановительное правосудие»

[NO_SCEDRECO][NO_REVIEW] -->
1. Карнозова Людмила Михайловна — Введение в восстановительное правосудие (медиация в ответ на преступление) (Проспект, 2014).pdf

<a id="Правовая-психология"></a>
## Правовая психология

<a id="Направления-изучения-психолого-правовых-феноменов"></a>
### Направления изучения психолого-правовых феноменов

<!--- [ACADEMIC_DEGREE] Гулевич — доцент, кандидат психологических наук — https://www.hse.ru/org/persons/66960 ; Голынчик — кандитат психологических наук — http://www.psy.msu.ru/people/golynchik.html -->
1. Гулевич Ольга Александровна, Голынчик Елена Олеговна — Правосознание и правовая социализация (Международное общество имени Л. С. Выготского, 2003).pdf

<a id="Правовой-нигилизм"></a>
## Правовой нигилизм

<a id="Российский-правовой-нигилизм"></a>
### Российский правовой нигилизм

<!--- [Гуляихин Вячеслав Николаевич](http://lib.volsu.ru/veduschie-uchenyie-VolGU/book/txt/Guljaihin.pdf) -->
1. Гуляихин Вячеслав Николаевич — Правовой нигилизм в России (Перемена, 2005).pdf

<a id="Правосудие-на-практике"></a>
## Правосудие на практике

<a id="Реалии-принятия-решений-судьями-Восточной-Европы"></a>
### Реалии принятия решений судьями Восточной Европы

<!--- [ACADEMIC_DEGREE_EDITOR] [Институт проблем правоприменения, CV](https://enforce.spb.ru/images/Presentations/CV/VolkovCV-rus1.pdf) — «Доктор социологических наук, PhD (Cambridge University, UK)», «1992-1995 Кембриджский университет (Великобритания), докторант Факультета социальных и политических наук», «Научный руководитель Института проблем правоприменения при ЕУСП, Профессор социологии права им. С.А. Муромцева»

[ACADEMIC_DEGREE_REVIEWERS] Бляхер Леонид Ефимович — [Тихоокеанский государственный университет](https://pnu.edu.ru/ru/library/bibliography/blyaher/) — «доктор философских наук (с 1998 г.)», «Основные направления научной деятельности: Общие вопросы социологии; Социология образования и воспитания; Социология экономики; Общие вопросы политических наук.»

Калиновский Константин Борисович — [Петрозаводский государственный университет](https://petrsu.ru/persons/1741/kalinovskij) — «кандидат юридических наук, доцент», «1996 г. Санкт Петербургская ВШ МВД РФ, специальность "Юриспруденция", квалификация "Юрист"»

[ACADEMIC_DEGREE] Дмитриева Арина Викторовна — [Институт проблем правоприменения](https://enforce.spb.ru/about-us/team/3167-dmitrieva-arina-viktorovna) — «2014 н.в. : PhD student at Law School, Faculty of Business and Social Sciences, University of Eastern Finland»

Панеях Элла Львовна — [ВШЭ](https://www.hse.ru/org/persons/35939067) — «2015 Кандидат социологических наук: Тихоокеанский государственный университет»

Поздняков Михаил Львович — [Институт проблем правоприменения, научная статья](https://enforce.spb.ru/images/Issledovanya/2014/IRL_Preprint_2014_03_M.Pozdnyakov_Sud-i-pravoohranitelnaya-sistema.pdf) — «юрист, специалист по вопросам орга-низации судебной деятельности, научный сотрудник Института проблем правоприменения при Европейском университете в Санкт-Петербурге»

Титаев Кирилл Дмитриевич — [Институт проблем правоприменения, CV](https://enforce.spb.ru/images/Presentations/CV/titaev_cv_ru_site_ipp_2019.pdf) — «Кандидат социологических наук, диссертация на тему «Арбитражные суды в системе властных отношений» по специальности 22.00.04 защищена в Ученом совете при Факультете социологии СПбГУ в 2016 году, приказ Минобрнауки о выдаче диплома кандидата наук No 624/нк от 22 июня 2017 года.»

Остальные авторы с учёными степенями

[POSITIVE_OR_NEUTRAL_REVIEW][REVIEW_LONG] Казун Антон Павлович, [Журнал социологии и социальной антропологии](https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/logika-rossiyskoy-sudebnoy-sistemy-retsenziya-na-knigu-kak-sudi-prinimayut-resheniya-empiricheskie-issledovaniya-prava-pod-red-v-v-volkova/pdf) — «Столь сильный авторский коллектив делает данную книгу привлекательной для всех, кто занимается проблемами правоприменения как в научной, так и в экспертной среде.», «В ней читатель почти не увидит таких слов, как «коррупция», «взятка» и т. п., что может вызвать немалое удивление. Как можно анализировать российские суды без того, чтобы говорить об их теневой части? Авторы книги, тем не менее, совсем не игнорируют данные вопросы. Напротив, они занимают по-настоящему нейтральную исследовательскую позицию, анализируя через статистические данные отклонения судебной системы от нормативных образцов», «В то же время это означает, что читателя обманули в самом начале. Вместо того чтобы отвечать на вопрос «Как судьи принимают решения?», что должно происходить в рамках веберианской традиции «понимающей социологии», книга отвечает скорее на вопрос «Как работает судебная система?»», «Замысел составителей данного сборника был заведомо значительно более широким и амбициозным, чем возможно было осуществить в рамках одной книги. Именно поэтому часть ключевых, а иногда самых общих вопросов оста-лась «между строк» и за пределами содержания сборника», «Так, размышляя о суде присяжных, нам не поясняют того, когда и в каких случаях такой вариант правосудия в принципе осуществляется. Крайне важный вопрос о «судебной иерархии» и роли председателя суда проходит в данной книге фоном, для него не нашлось отдельной главы», «Читатель дан-ной книги, к сожалению, не узнает о том, как выстроены отношения между председателями судов и их подчиненными. В этом контексте также крайне важ-ным было бы рассмотреть вопрос о ротации судей и факторах, которые влияют на их продвижение по службе или увольнение. Вопросы «вознаграждения», не нашедшие отражения в данном сборнике, также имеют ключевое значение, по-скольку через премии и различного рода надбавки председатели судов получа-ют дополнительные возможности для давления на своих подчиненных. Анало-гичным образом в сборнике не рассматривается такой базовый механизм воздействия на судью как распределение рабочей нагрузки», «Кроме того, авторы практически полностью опустили методологические аспекты своего исследования. Зачастую читателю забывали рассказать о том, как и откуда были получены столь замечательные данные, используемые в ана-лизе, с какими людьми были проведены интервью и сколько их было.», «Именно поэтому книгу «Как судьи принимают решения» можно считать не столько «введением» в проблему российской судебной системы, сколько «про-двинутым курсом», читать который сложно без предварительного знакомства с некоторыми более ранними и фундаментальными текстами.»

Марина Куркчиян, [Laboratorium](https://www.ceeol.com/search/viewpdf?id=290688) — «This book is a long overdue contribution to Russian-language work in the field of sociolegal studies. It offers a selection of empirically based investigations of the Russian judiciary, cast within the “law in action” paradigm that scrutinizes how things happen in the real world rather than how they are intended or ought to happen. The volume makes a significant step away from the stereotypical black-and-white accounts of the Russian legal system often produced by Western and Russian scholars alike.», «This is an insightful observation but the reader is left wondering how different those strategies are from the behavior of Western judges, who enjoy even wider discretion and often use it in the same way. If the author could have shown the contrast between the practice of Western and Russian judges, that would have strengthened the author’s argument that in the Russian case this could be explained by the tendency of judges to find a compromise between prosecutors’ pressure and professional integrity. Otherwise the claim remains speculative.», «To make the argument convincing, it would have been helpful if Maslovskaia had looked at previous attempts to transplant the institution of juries from the common law tradition into the Continental law system. It is doubtful that she would have found successes.», «The problem with this approach is that it takes the law out of consideration.», «Although the differences between Ukraine and Russia in their libel and electoral laws may not be significant, careful methodology requires that they should be examined before they can be disregarded.», «However, the assumptions often lack the support that a scrutiny of in-depth case studies would provide and thus remain speculative, at least in some chapters.», «The critical comments above should not be read as shortcomings of the volume but rather as evidence that the book is a thought-provoking contribution inviting serious discussion and engagement. The volume would be of interest to any sociolegal scholar studying Russia»

[Kr/MCol][Ti/MCol]

[ADDITIONAL_READING] Christine Parker, Adrian Evans — «Inside Lawyers’ Ethics»

Волков Вадим Викторович — «Как обеспечить независимость судей в России»

Marina Kurkchiyan, Agnieszka Kubal — «A Sociology of Justice in Russia»

[BOOK_SERIES] «Extra Jus»
-->
1. Волков Вадим Викторович (под редакцией) — Как судьи принимают решения꞉ эмпирические исследования права (Статут, 2012).pdf

<a id="Российская-практика-участия-в-судебных-делах"></a>
### Российская практика участия в судебных делах

<!--- [PROFESSIONAL_DEGREE] «адвокат, член адвокатской палаты Московской области, член правления СРО Национальной Ассоциации медицинских организаций, г.Москва» — http://www.csi-med.ru/ehksperty/klopova-i-a/

[NO_SCEDRECO][NO_SOURCES][NO_REVIEW] -->
1. Клопова Ирина Александровна — Как выиграть суд без адвоката. Только практика (Издательские решения, 2020).pdf

<a id="Справедливое-правосудие"></a>
## Справедливое правосудие

<a id="Разница-между-стандартами-справедливого-правосудия-и-российской-судебной-практикой"></a>
### Разница между стандартами справедливого правосудия и российской судебной практикой

<!--- [CRIM] Либерализм

[Морщакова Тамара Георгиевна](https://www.hse.ru/org/persons/68773)

[BOOK_SUPPORT] Фонд «Либеральная миссия»

[NOTE_FULL_NAME] Морщакова Тамара Георгиевна (редю) — Стандарты справедливого правосудия. Международные и национальные практики (Мысль, 2012)

[INFO] Большой коллектив авторов, однако нет научных редакторов/рецензентов/консультантов. Поэтому и нет высшей категории. -->
1. Морщакова Тамара Георгиевна (ред.) — Стандарты справедливого правосудия (Мысль, 2012).pdf

<a id="Философия-права"></a>
## Философия права

<a id="Аналитическая-философия-права"></a>
### Аналитическая философия права

<a id="Правовой-позитивизм-Герберта-Харта"></a>
#### Правовой позитивизм Герберта Харта

<!--- [INFO] Редакторы — доктор философских наук Евгений Васильевич Афонасин — https://classics.nsu.ru/afonasin/Afonasin_cv_rus.pdf , доктор философских наук Вячеслав Иванович Моисеев — https://www.msmsu.ru/obrazovanie/teaching-staff/845/

[Харт Герберт Лайонел Адольфус](https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/287487789.pdf)
-->
1. Харт Герберт Лайонел Адольфус — Понятие права (Издательство СПбГУ, 2007).pdf

<a id="Здоровье"></a>
# Здоровье

<a id="Алкоголь"></a>
## Алкоголь

<a id="Медикализация-употребления-алкоголя"></a>
### Медикализация употребления алкоголя

<a id="HC-1"></a>
#### HC

<!--- [ACADEMIC_DEGREE] «PhD, University of California, Los Angeles; Research Interests Philosophy of Psychology» — https://www.philosophy.ucsb.edu/people/herbert-fingarette

[POSITIVE_OR_NEUTRAL_REVIEW][REVIEW_ONE_PAGE] David R. Rudy, Morehead State University — https://sci-hub.se/10.2307/2073887 — «Fingarette has produced an outstanding work, not because it is the definitive treatment on heavy drinking but because it is a sound, rational, thought-provoking treatment of much of the contemporary American alcoholism enterprise. It will remain a valuable contribution to the literature on drinking behavior for a long time.»

[REVIEW_ONE_PAGE] Paul Schmolling, Ph.D. Mental Health & Human Services Program Kingsborough Community College City University of New York Brooklyn — https://sci-hub.se/https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/0740547289900536 — «This book is a model of effective writing for the general reader about a specialized field. Regretably, books written for professionals rarely attain the sharp, incisive style of this one.», «In summary, this is a compact, well-argued book for the general reader which presents a powerful critique of the disease model of alcoholism.»

[REVIEW_HIGH_ERUDITION] M. M. Glatt, Huntercombe Manor Hospital, Huntercombe Lane South, Taplow, Maidenhead, Berks — https://sci-hub.se/10.1093/oxfordjournals.alcalc.a045151 — «Hegoes out of his way to attack the 'discredited'Classic Disease Concept of alcoholism, 'itstenets and beliefs contradicted and refuted bydecades of scientific research'», «It is obvious that the disease concept ofalcoholism, put forth by Jelliiik and funda-mental to the teaching of AA, so stronglycriticized by Fingarette, did not apply to allheavy drinking as Jellinek (1960) himself tookpains to stress: defining alcoholism broadly as'any drinking that causes any damage'», «The question ofwhether mild or moderately dependent drink-ers can practise controlled drinking may indeedbe controversial, but in the case of severelydependent drinkers, a recent inquiry in theBritish Journal of Addictions (1986, 1987)showed a fairly uniform agreement on the needfor total abstinence», «although one may doubt whether this approach would be advised for the severely dependent drinker», «Professor Fingarette's book is well resear-ched, written in a lucid style, highly informa-tive and often provocative. His tendency to avoid the term 'alcohol dependence' and toreplace it with 'heavy drinking' often makes forsemantic difficulties and confusion.»

Ferdinand Schoeman, University of South Carolina, Columbia — https://sci-hub.se/https://www.jstor.org/stable/2185080 — «Heavy Drinking is an elegant, engaging, and synoptic treatment of a most perplexing set of issues relating to long-term alcohol abuse, especially the kind of issue the Court faced in Traynor», «I do not think that he regards the demolition of the "classic" disease concept of alcoholism and his profoundly insightful reanalysis of long-term drinking patterns as meaningful and selected as settling irrebuttably an individual's accountability for his/her excessive drinking patterns. The contours and complexities of individual life histories are too tangled and variable for such a presumption.»

[REVIEW_SEMI] Anders Bergmark, Stockholm University ( https://www.su.se/english/profiles/anber-1.182799 ); Lars Oscarsson, Ersta Sköndal University College ( https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Lars_Oscarsson ) — https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/145507258900600217 — «Denna bakgrund, en blandning av distans och insiderposition, gor Fingarette til! en i hogsta grad lamp-lig person att kommentera klyftan mellan populariserade myter och ve-tenskapliga fakta.», «Nar Fingarette till slut dristar sig till att ange några riktlinjer får hur behandlingen av alkoholproblem bor utvecklas uppvisar hans framstall-ning, får fårsta och enda gången, en mindre overtygande uppbyggnad.», «I sin diskussion av fciregivna och faktiska behandlings effekter presen-terar Fingarette in te bara massivite-ten hos de fakta som satter aUvarliga frågetecken infcir legitimiteten hos ett behandlings perspektiv på alko-holproblem. Han visar också på de ekonomiska omstandigheter som har en mytologireproducerande funk-tion.», ««Åven om vi som lasare blir fårsakra-de om att en behandlingsinsats mås-te ta sin utgångspunkt i den specifi-ka meningsstruktur som omgardar varje individs drickande och att de fårslag Fingarette ger ar grundade på optimism snarare an fakta, så in-finner sig en vis s tveksamhet. Plots-ligt uppvisar Fingarette en sorts pragmatism och rekommenderar t.ex. beteendeterapeutiska strategier som om det inte fanns en koppling mellan den typen av åtgarder och de artikulerade teoretiska anspråk som inlarningsteoretiker får fram», «Trots denna mindre skonhetsflack består emellertid det totaia intrycket av Fingarettes framstallning orub-bat; "Heavy Drinking" ar en snudd på idealisk popularvetenskaplig pro-dukt, åtminstone utifrån en veten-skaplig bedomningshorisont.» «Vid en bedomning ur ett "konsumentper-spektiv" ar det fårstås mojligt att bokens popularvetenskapliga mis-sion passar illa med dess budskap: Vilka, utanfår en vetenskaplig krets, ar intresserade av att bli overtygade om att alkohol is m inte ar en sjukdom?»

[BOOK_OR_AUTHOR_OR_CONCEPT_CRITICISM][REVIEW_SEMI] Craig R. Janes — Department of Anthropology and Sociology, University of Colorado at Denver — https://sci-hub.se/10.1525/maq.1990.4.4.02a00180 — «In a well organized and logical argument employing a selective but reasonably representative review of the salient literature, Fingarette concludes that a single, identifiable syndrome of alcoholic drinking does not exist», «Although to the knowledgeable reader none of this analysis is particularly new or groundbreaking, Fingarette does a good job of distilling the major elements of what is a complex sociohistorical, political, economic, and cultural problem», «Unlike part one, which is by and large an empirically sound, well-crafted, and persuasive argument, part two is prone to ill-founded speculation, and what one suspects is Fingarette's personal opinion about heavy drinkers in general.», «Given Fingarette's argument in part one that contextual factors are powerfully influential in drinking behavior, his emphasis on highly individualized treatment strategies that stress "personal responsibility" emerges as a non sequitur. After very brief mention, those factors that in fact "shape" life-styles—culture and ethnicity, social relations, class, occupation, gender, are left by Fingarette in the shadowy background. Anthropologists will find this a frustrating and unillummating discussion.», «Fingarette may further damage his argument—particularly for nonspecialist readers—by repudiating the widely held view that one of the primary goals of treatment should be total abstinence.», «However, it seems counterintuitive to suggest that simply helping a person reduce his consumption to moderate levels, rather than helping a person to achieve complete abstinence, will generate the kind of fundamental life-style change that Fingarette argues must be the primary goal bf treatment.», «This approach parallels current work in the prevention field and highlights the major political and policy issues that surround alcohol availability. However, as with the discussion of treatment, Fingarette avoids discussion of the prevention implications of those messy "intervening" social variables that affect alcohol consumption: the value or function drinking in particular subcultural contexts (ethnic groups, neighborhoods, families, and occupations) and how and why such values and functions develop, as well as the social processes that may give rise to or shape the particular contexts in which individuals fashion their lives and thereby integrate drinking into them.», «Although the book is written for a lay audience, Fingarette's capable handling of the material and his clear and thoughtful exposition of issues relating to the cultural construction of alcoholism and alcoholism treatment offer much of interest to addiction specialists, medical social scientists, and teachers. Alcohol specialists and medical social scientists will appreciate, though perhaps not agree with, Fingarette's distillations of major research findings and his examination of these findings in the context of treatment and prevention policy. Probably the primary usefulness of the book, though, is pedagogical. It would be a good supplementary text for undergraduate courses in medicat anthropology or comparative health systems.»

[REVIEW_ONE_PAGE] Michael Moore, University of California, Berkeley, and University of Southern California — https://sci-hub.se/10.1086/293115 — «This is a courageous book. It is certain to bring down a rain of familiar criticism on its author, such as that he is no more sophisticated than Nancy Reagan on these matters, thinking that alcoholics can "just say no" to alcohol; that he will undo the work of generations in getting alcoholics accepted as sick rather than bad; etc. Yet at this level the book is immune to criticism. For its major point is surely correct: heavy drinking is a chosen pattern of behavior for which the drinker is responsible.», «To a philosophical audience the book will be disappointing, not for its conclusions but for the depth of its arguments. Complex philosophical conundrums such as the nature of disease or the nature and moral relevance of compelling cravings are not analyzed so much as treated as matters resolvable by scientific research.», «Yet as Fingarette's early work clearly evidences, there can be no scientific findings about "loss of control" and like matters without a philosophical elucidation of items such as will, compulsion, and character, and their relation to responsibility. And this the book does not provide.»

[REVIEW_ONE_PAGE][REVIEW_SMASHER] Theodore Ernst, Bethany Center Honesdale, PA — https://sci-hub.se/10.1093/sw/34.2.173 — «In posing a challenge to the Jellinek disease model, Fingarette is beating a dead horse.», «Fingarette emphasizes the fact that an etiology of alcoholism has never been established. However, known causation has never been a necessary condition for designating a morbid physical condition as a disease. Like many other diseases, the etiology of alcoholism is both unclear and complex.», «Fingarette is challenging a disease model that is no longer accepted by either clinicians or researchers.»

[REVIEW_ONE_PAGE] Marc Keller, Brookline, Mass. — https://sci-hub.se/10.15288/jsa.1990.51.86 — «To confirm his thesis, Professor Fingarette vigorously, and often with sound argument, attacks the "classic disease concept of alcoholism" which is described according to Martin Mann, and is blamed, with some justification, on E.M. Jellinek and Alcoholics Anonymous. Earlier conceptions, going back to antiquity--the real classics--are ignored. For his own nondisease concept, Fingarette relies chiefly on the work of Pattison, Sobell and Sobell (1977). He notes, again with some justification, that "no scientific research team has ever identified a biological cause that makes people chronic heavy drinkers." He has chosen to disregard the neurobehavioral disease model of Frawley (1987) and the strictly biological disease model of Kissin (1983), to cite just two examples», «True, he can argue that neither of these models has been proven by a "scientific research team," but has any scientific research team ever definitively demonstrated that schizophrenia or focal cortical seizures have a "biological cause"?», «Clearly, the professor's tactics are calculated to argue his case», «One aspect of the problem of "alcoholics' or "heavy drinkers" overlooked by Professor Fingarette was brilliantly highlighted by Selden Bacon (1958), who observed that "alcoholics do not drink" at all, they injest alcohol.»

[REVIEW_SMASHER] J. Angelo Corlett, Department of Philosophy, University of Arizona — https://sci-hub.se/https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF00489833 — «In analyzing Fingarette's argument for the self-control theory of drinking disorders I conclude that it is problematic for the following reasons: (1) his argument assumes that the identification of a single cause of alcoholism is a necessary condition of its being a disease; (2) unless it is already assumed (a priori) that persons with drinking disorders possess freedom and self-control to the extent that Fingarette assumes they do, then such persons are likely to suffer from apathy or defeatism regarding their condition; (3) even if Fingarette is correct in his criticism of certain health care programs for those with ssess freedom and self-control to the extent that Fingarette assumes they do, then such persons are likely to suffer from apathy or defeatism regarding their condition; (4) Fingarette's claim that those with drinking disorders are morally responsible for their actions that result from their disorders is problematic, that is, unless it can be shown that such persons act freely; and (5) Fingarette attempts to suppor/the self-control theory of alcoholism by refuting a 'straw man' conception of the disease model of alcoholism.», «Fingarette's argument contains some logical and conceptual confusions.», «If this criticism holds, then Fingarette does nothing to provide philosophical grounding for his claim that alcoholism as a disease is a myth. For his thesis rests on the disease theories of alcoholism being refuted by his argumentation.», «And if Fingarette replies that one must assume that the self-control theory is true, then he has a viciously circular argument, one which assumes from the start what it tries to conclude and is uninformative», «Even if it is the case that the disease model of alcoholism leads to apathy, and even if it is true that there is no reason to suppose that the self-control model fails to lead to apathy, it still does not follow that the disease model is wrong or that the self-control theory is correct. In fact, the apathy of patients is quite irrelevant to the matter of whether or not alcoholism is a disease», «Certainly the disease theorists of alcoholism do not have to claim (and to my knowledge in fact do not claim) that the treatability of alcoholism is a condition (of any kind) of alcoholism's being a disease. Again, Fingarette is attempting to refute a 'straw man'.», «Thus this very same criticism comes back to haunt Fingarette's self-control theory. For he has done nothing to justify his theory, even if his criticisms of competing theories holds.», «Some of the previous difficulties with Fingarette's project might be the result of yet another problem: his attempt to refute the disease theories of alcoholism by using a caricature or naive version of what is nowadays usually thought by reputable persons to be the disease concept of alcoholism.», «Fingarette is aware that "no leading research authorities accept the classic disease concept" ([1], p. 3). If this is the case, then why spend one's time refuting what no 'authority' believes? And, if Fingarette refutes this older notion of the disease concept of alcoholism in order to say what is wrong with current theories of this sort, then it is absolutely imperative that he specify the ways in which contemporary disease theories fall prey to the same errors that the classic theory does. If he fails on this count, then he clearly refutes a 'straw man'.»

[ADDITIONAL_READING] Ted Goldberg — «Demistyfing drugs. A Psychological Perspective»

[NO_SCANNED_PDF][NO_SCEDRECO] -->
1. Fingarette Herbert — Heavy Drinking. The Myth of Alcoholism as a Disease (University of California Press, 1988).pdf

<a id="Самопомощь-при-проблемах-с-алкоголем"></a>
### Самопомощь при проблемах с алкоголем

<!--- [ACADEMIC_DEGREE] PhD — https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/therapists/michael-levy-phd-andover-ma/278419

[POSITIVE_OR_NEUTRAL_REVIEW][REVIEW_RETELLING] T. Cameron Wild — an Alberta Heritage Foundation for Medical Research Health Scholar and a Professor in the School of Public Health at the University of Alberta — https://sci-hub.se/10.1037/a0013997 — «One puzzling feature of the book was that no information wasprovided on concurrent drug or tobacco use. This was surprising,given the high rates of co-occurrence of different addictive behav-iours documented in the literature. I also occasionally found theanecdotes used to illustrate strategies to be a little contrived andone-dimensional. However, these are minor quibbles in an other-wise excellent self-help book that fills a distinct gap in attemptingto reach problem drinkers who will never otherwise seek treatmentor an intervention in the health care system.»

[NO_SCEDRECO] -->
1. Levy Michael S. — Take Control of Your Drinking… And You May Not Need to Quit (The Johns Hopkins University Press, 2007).pdf

<a id="Контролируемое-употребление-алкоголя"></a>
#### Контролируемое употребление алкоголя

<!--- [ACADEMIC_DEGREE] Миллер «Ph.D. (1976) Major: Clinical Psychology» — https://casaa.unm.edu/download/wrmillercv.pdf ; Муньос — «Ph.D., Clinical Psychology, University of Oregon, Eugene (1977)» — https://www.paloaltou.edu/faculty/ricardo-munoz

[POSITIVE_OR_NEUTRAL_REVIEW][REVIEW_ONE_PAGE] Jalie A. Tucker, School of Public Health, University of Alabama at Birmingham — https://sci-hub.se/10.1111/j.1360-0443.2005.01278.x — «Herein lie two limitations of this otherwiseappealing guide. First, advances in motivational inter-ventions since 1975 are not systematically incorporatedinto the revision, which does not offer much to motivatereaders to change. Second, the flexible approach will notappeal to drinkers who want a simple plan that is largelyprescribed, e.g. one that takes them through set drinkinggoals at low intake levels, perhaps after a period of initialabstinence, and then graduates them to higher or morevariable levels of drinking as they succeed.», «Obviously, no weight loss plan works for every-one, but many are available to try until one does. Thesame variety is increasingly available for smoking cessa-tion, but the alcohol area lags behind.The next generation of self-help books on drinkingmanagement should entertain how to enhance motiva-tion for change and reach more of the target audiencewith different plans from which they can select.»

[REVIEW_ONE_PAGE] Bill Saunders, Abbotsford Private Hospital, Perth, Australia — https://sci-hub.se/10.1111/dar.12138 — «So, will such a book help problem drinkers control their drinking? Well, as has been shown by Miller himself, bibliotherapy works. Reading a book may notbe as good as seeing a skilled therapist, but it certainly beats seeing a bad one or doing nothing at all. So, instead of going home with a good red, go home with this good read.»

[REVIEW_ONE_PAGE] Spencer Madden, editor of the journal «Alcohol and alcoholism» ( https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/E12B2EFEE75B7050F30CE26DABE1DFD1/S0955603600046225a.pdf ) — https://sci-hub.se/10.1093/alcalc/agl064 — «Yet the tenorof the writing is slanted towards a controlled drinking goalin a manner that can mislead subjects who would damagethemselves by further consumption.The manual generously ends with a compendium of similarself-help guides. Despite the above reservation the present textis a useful, modestly priced addition to the list.»

[ADDITIONAL_READING] Cyndi Turner — Practicing Alcohol Moderation. A Comprehensive Workbook

[NOTE_FULL_NAME] Controlling Your Drinking. Tools to Make Moderation Work for You (The Guilford Press, 2013)

[NO_SCEDRECO] -->
1. [Miller William Richard](https://casaa.unm.edu/staffcode/wrmiller.html), Muñoz Ricardo F. — Controlling Your Drinking (The Guilford Press, 2013).pdf

<a id="Будущее-медицины"></a>
## Будущее медицины

<!--- [PROFESSIONAL_DEGREE] M.D. with Honor, University of Rochester School of Medicine & Dentistry — https://www.yumpu.com/en/document/read/9505963/eric-j-topol-cv-october-2012-scripps-translational-science-institute

[CRIM_SPEAKER] https://www.ted.com/speakers/eric_topol -->
1. Тополь Эрик — Будущее медицины. Ваше здоровье в ваших руках (Альпина Диджитал, 2015).pdf

<a id="Врачебная-этика"></a>
## Врачебная этика

<!--- [ACADEMIC_DEGREE] «Prof. Dr. med., Psychiater» — https://www.aerzteblatt.de/archiv/153470/Interview-mit-Prof-Dr-med-Klaus-Doerner-Psychiater-Fuers-Helfen-ansprechbarer-geworden

[POSITIVE_OR_NEUTRAL_REVIEW][REVIEW_HIGH_ERUDITION] Лехциер Виталий Леонидович, доктор философских наук ( https://ssau.ru/staff/3644575-lekhtsier-vitaliy-leonidovich ) — http://www.phil63.ru/files/Mix-09-04.pdf — «Наиболее принципиально и систематически на эту тему высказался немецкий врач и философ Клаус Дёрнер в своей необычайно точной, глубокой и намечающей абсолютно новые горизонты книге «Хороший врач».»; «Итак, Дёрнер очерчивает совершенно новые горизонты биоэтики, в рамках которых появляется возможность обоснования имманентной врачебной этики, осуществления практического синтеза медицины и философии и возможность ответа на вечный вопрос, что же такое «хороший врач».»

Цепелева Надежда Валерьевна, Новосибирский государственный медицинский университет — https://www.elibrary.ru/download/elibrary_43044691_53487679.pdf — «В работе Дёрнера обращают на себя внимание прежде всего мировоззренческие и методологические принципы,лежащие в основе утверждений немецкого врача и, можно сказать, мыслителя, к которым он пришел в результате своего собственного жизненного и профессионального опыта(книга во многом автобиографична, личностна и, можно отметить, «выстрадана» автором).», «Интересный фактический материал, высокий философский уровень обобщения, продемонстрированный К. Дёрнером в своей работе, позволяет нам сделать вывод о том, что эта книга должна стать ценным руководством для философов и специалистов «помогающих» профессий»

Б.Б. Дондокова, Санкт-Петербург, Военно-медицинская академия, им. С.М. Кирова — http://venec.ulstu.ru/lib/disk/2020/53.pdf#page=185 — «Дернер последовательно обосновывает обращение к моральным интуициям врача, лежащим в основании повседневной врачебной практики. Он убежден в глубокой укорененности заботы врача о себе в заботы о пациентах, как Других и Чужих, что, по сути, и является моральным основанием медицинской этики.»

[NOTE] Нашёл только рецензии на русском

[NO_SCEDRECO] 

[BOOK_SERIES] Гуманистическая психиатрия
-->
1. Дёрнер Клаус — Хороший врач. Учебник основной позиции врача (Алетейа, 2006).djvu

<a id="Выгорание"></a>
## Выгорание

<a id="NR-9"></a>
### NR

<a id="Паранаучные-теории"></a>
#### Паранаучные теории

<!--- [ACADEMIC_DEGREE] Старченкова — кандидат психологических наук, доцент кафедры психологического обеспечения профессиональной деятельности — https://psy.spbu.ru/department/teachers/614-starchenkova-es ; Водопьянова — доктор психологических наук, профессор кафедры психологического обеспечения профессиональной деятельности — https://psy.spbu.ru/department/teachers/426-vodopyanova-ne

[CRIM_TRAININGS] Старченкова — бизнес-тренер — https://psy.spbu.ru/department/teachers/614-starchenkova-es

[BOOK_NEW_EDITION] 2016 — https://urait.ru/book/sindrom-vygoraniya-diagnostika-i-profilaktika-402432

[AD_JUSTIFICATION] Со страницы 235 приводятся техники НЛП

[ADDITIONAL_READING] Орёл Валерий Емельянович — Синдром психического выгорания личности

[BOOK_SERIES] Практическая психология

[NO_SCEDRECO][NO_REVIEW] -->
1. Старченкова Елена Станиславовна, Водопьянова Наталия Евгеньевна — Синдром выгорания. Диагностика и профилактика (Питер, 2009).pdf

<a id="Исследования-выгорания"></a>
### Исследования выгорания

<!--- [ACADEMIC_DEGREE_EDITOR] «Dr. Sabine Bährer-Kohler is a holder of a Doctorate in Social Science (Dr. rer.soc) from the University of Tübingen, a Diploma in Education from the University of Education – Freiburg, and a Diploma in Social Work and Social Education from the Protestant University of Applied Sciences.» — https://www.ipa-online.org/about/board-of-directors/sabine-bahrer-kohler

[ACADEMIC_DEGREE] Некоторые из авторов имеют докторскую степень, другие — нет

[ADDITIONAL_READING] Sabine Bährer-Kohler, Francisco Javier Carod-Artal — «Global Mental Health : Prevention and Promotion»

Kanfer, F.H., Reinecker, H. & Schmelzer, D. — «Selbstmanagement-Therapie, Ein Lehrbuch für die klinische Praxis»

and another books for “self-regulation” and “self-observation”, e. g.:

Rodriguez Noelie, Ryave Alan — «Systematic self-observation»

[NO_REVIEW] -->
1. Bährer-Kohler Sabine (editor) — Burnout for Experts꞉ Prevention in the Context of Living and Working (Springer, 2013).pdf

<a id="Управление-выгоранием-и-его-профилактика"></a>
### Управление выгоранием и его профилактика

<!--- [ACADEMIC_DEGREE] Лейтер — «Dr. Michael P. Leiter is Professor of Organisational Psychology at Deakin University in Melbourne Australia.» — https://mpleiter.com/about/ ; Маслах — «Ph.D., Social Psychology, Stanford University» — https://view.officeapps.live.com/op/view.aspx?src=https%3A%2F%2Fmaslach.socialpsychology.org%2Fcv%2Fcv-2014.doc

[POSITIVE_OR_NEUTRAL_REVIEW][REVIEW_ORG] Dr. med. Steffen Häfner Medizinische Universitätsklinik und Poliklinik — https://www.balintgesellschaft.de/ueber-die-dbg/publikationen/neuerscheinungen/rezensionen-michael-p-leiter-christina-maslach-burnout-erfolgreich-vermeiden-sechs-strategien-wie-sie-ihr-verhaeltnis-zur-arbeit-verbessern/ — «Anschauliche Fallbeispiele illustrieren die theoretischen Abschnitte. Sie sind realistisch, zeigen, dass sich einiges verändern lässt, wenn auch oft nicht alles, es aber gelingen kann, für beide Seiten ein größeres Maß an Zufriedenheit zu erzielen, mithin win-win-Situationen zu schaffen und aus negativen Verhaltenszirkeln herauszukommen. Allenfalls das Kapitel über Werte bleibt etwas nebulös. Hier stellt sich oft die Frage, ob die Verhältnisse jenseits des Atlantiks auf deutschsprachige Arbeitswelten so einfach übertragbar sind, oder was auch kulturgebunden zu sehen ist.», «Es lohnt sich aber, wie auf Seite 168 vorgeschlagen, das Buch als ständigen Begleiter im Bücherregal aufzubewahren, um sich mit den Strategien vertraut machen zu können, wenn man sie wieder braucht.», «Fazit: Die Autoren geben ihre profunde Kenntnis und Erfahrung über die Ursachen und Behandlungsmöglichkeiten von beruflich bedingtem Burnout in diesem hochstrukturierten und gewinnbringend durchzuarbeitenden Buch weiter. Es ist ein sehr empfehlenswert Buch, um die eher unterbelichteten Seiten einer Psychosomatischen Arbeitsmedizin zu erhellen.»

[BOOK_OR_AUTHOR_OR_CONCEPT_CRITICISM] Prof. Dr. Harald Uhlendorff Psychologischer Psychotherapeut — https://www.socialnet.de/rezensionen/5259.php — «Angesichts vieler Beispiele von nachvollziehbar geschilderten Arbeitsplatzproblemen und potenziell hilfreichen Lösungsstrategien, kann ich mir gut vorstellen, dass der interessierte Leser sich über eigene Ziele klarer werden und Anregungen für Handlungsmöglichkeiten finden kann.», «Aus wissenschaftlicher Perspektive bin ich von dem Buch enttäuscht: Verbindungen zum Burnout-Konzept werden nicht dargestellt, es fehlen Hinweise zu den Gütekriterien des Testverfahrens und es finden sich keine Nachweise zur Effektivität der vorgeschlagenen Strategien.», «Das Buch bietet eine reichhaltige Sammlung von Problemen, die am Arbeitsplatz auftreten können und von passenden Lösungsideen. Leider fehlen Angaben, in wie weit die vorgeschlagene Vorgehensweisen nach wissenschaftlichen Kriterien sinnvoll sind.»

[NO_SOURCES][NO_SCEDRECO] -->
1. Leiter Michael P., Maslach Christina — Banishing Burnout꞉ Six Strategies for Improving Your Relationship with Work (Jossey-Bass, 2005).pdf

<a id="Устные-истории-переживших-выгорание"></a>
### Устные истории переживших выгорание

<a id="NR-10"></a>
#### NR

<a id="НЛП"></a>
##### НЛП

<!--- [AD_JUSTIFICATION] Alain Wolff, автор главы 13, «NLP-Master»

«Bei meinem neuen Therapeuten kam ich zum ersten Mal mit Coaching in Kontakt und die Bücher von Anthony Robbins, welche mir empfohlen wurden, weckten sehr großes Interesse für diese Form von Kurzzeittherapie.», «Ich erkundigte mich dann im Internet über NLP (Neuro-Linguistisches Programmieren, auch eine Form der Kurzzeittherapie) und meldete mich zum sogenannten Practitioner Kurs an.», «Doch gleich der erste Kurs hatte seine Wirkung gezeigt und ich sah von da an die Welt und mein Umfeld mit anderen Augen.»

[CRIM_SPEAKER][CRIM_COACH] Авторы — спикеры, коачи, а не учёные -->
1. Buchenau Peter, Nelting Manfred — Burnout Von Betroffenen lernen! (Springer Gabler, 2015).pdf

<a id="Доказательная-медицина"></a>
## Доказательная медицина

<!--- [ACADEMIC_DEGREE] Согласно самой книге, Перез «Especialista en Medicina Interna y Subespecialidad en Endocrinología, Maestría en Metodología de la Ciencia, Doctorado en Medicina, Servicio de Endocrinología de SM UANL/Clínica NOVA, Profesor de Medicina Pregrado y Posgrado»

Специальные соавторы — 3 доктора медицины, соавторы — медики без докторской степени.

[NO_REVIEW] -->
1. Tamez Pérez Héctor Eloy — El ABC de la medicina científica (McGraw Hill, 2012).pdf
<!--- [ACADEMIC_DEGREE] Не нашёл сведений об учёных званиях у Бодэ. Но имеет соответствующее образование и является научным журналистом.

[AUTHOR_PROJECT] «Проект о биологии и медицине Fleming», Telegram-канал Darth Biology

[NO_SCEDRECO]

[BOOK_SERIES] Доказательно о медицине

[NO_PDF] -->
1. [Бодэ Ирина Игоревна](https://elementy.ru/events/440983/Nauchno_populyarnaya_lektsiya_Iriny_Bode_Estestvennyy_faervol_chto_takoe_immunitet_i_kak_on_rabotaet) — Гиппократ не рад. Путеводитель в мире медицинских исследований (АСТ, 2019).fb2

<a id="История-доказательной-медицины"></a>
### История доказательной медицины

<!--- [PROFESSIONAL_DEGREE] «Окончил Казанский государственный медицинский университет по специальности «Врач-терапевт» и ординатуру Казанской государственной медицинской академии по эндокринологии. Работал врачом-эндокринологом» — https://elementy.ru/bookclub/author/5275073/pyotr_valentinovich_talantov

[BOOK_SERIES] Библиотека фонда Эволюция

[NO_SCANNED_PDF] -->
1. Талантов Пётр Валентинович — 0,05. Доказательная медицина от магии до поисков бессмертия (Corpus, 2019).epub

<a id="Учебники-по-доказательной-медицине"></a>
### Учебники по доказательной медицине

<!--- [ACADEMIC_DEGREE] «She has a doctorate in diabetes care and an MBA in Higher Education Management.» — https://www.nuffieldtrust.org.uk/person/trisha-greenhalgh

[ACADEMIC_DEGREE_REVIEWERS] Василий Викторович Власов, доктор медицинских наук — https://www.hse.ru/org/persons/14527416 ; Николай Иванович Брико, доктор медицинских наук — https://www.sechenov.ru/univers/all/3853/

[AUTHOR_PROJECT] «Interdisciplinary Research in Health Sciences (IRIHS)» — https://www.phc.ox.ac.uk/research/interdisciplinary-research-in-health-sciences

[POSITIVE_OR_NEUTRAL_REVIEW][REVIEW_SELF-PUBLISHING] Леонов Василий Петрович — «Кандидат технических наук. Доцент кафедры прикладной информатики. Сфера научных интересов прикладная статистика в медицине, биологии, экологии.» ( http://www.inf.tsu.ru/Decanat/Staff.nsf/url/LeonovVP ) — http://www.biometrica.tomsk.ru/review2.htm — «Тем не менее сама цель создания этой книги заслуживает уважения, поскольку Триша Гринхальх действительно написала книгу, содержание которой вполне доступно не только студентам первого курса, но во многом и рядовому обывателю.», «Однако второе утверждение характерно для непрофессионала, далекого от количественного инструментария. Лишь человек далекий от статистики способен так думать. На самом же деле у профессионального статистика, и в первую очередь биостатистика, на первом месте стоят не числа и формулы, а умение генерировать на вербальном уровне первоначальные идеи о механизмах изучаемых процессов.», «Но это вовсе не означает, что для тех, кто хорошо владеет методами статистики эта книга будет бесполезна. Напротив, она даст возможность увидеть наиболее популярные "статистические премудрости" глазами непрофессионала. О том, насколько хорошо это удалось автору книги, читатели сделают свой собственный вывод, прочитав ее. С нашей же точки зрения, автору это в основном удалось, и ниже мы к этому еще вернемся.», «К сожалению, отсутствие статистическго инструментария в ряде глав не дает читателю необходимого и достаточного знания для того, чтобы в дальнейшем самостоятельно принимать те те или иные решения относительно статистических гипотез.», «Возможно, что все эти нюансы кому-то могут показаться не очень существенными. Однако не будем забывать, что данное издание адресовано "неспециалистам", и уже потому предполагает исключение подобных двусмысленностей.»

[REVIEW_EXPERT] Steve Simon, P. Mean Consulting, Leawood, Kansas, USA — https://sci-hub.se/10.1080/10543406.2011.550117 — «Dr.Greenhalgh relies heavily on existing research standards, such as the CONSORT guidelines for the reporting of clinical trials, and carefully backs up her statementswith references in the peer-reviewed literature.The bibliography is outstanding.», «As someone who is always curious how a non-statistician views statistics, Ijumped ahead early and read the chapter “Statistics for the Non-Statistician.” It is avery disappointing effort.», «She fails to mention the distinction between populations and samples, betweenparameters and statistics, or even between the null and alternative hypothesis.This leads to a badly botched explanation ofpvalues (“the probability that anyparticular outcome would have arisen by chance”) and an even worse statementabout the probability that the population parameter lies above the upper confidencelimit. There is nothing about the Bayesian alternative topvalues and confidenceintervals. The contrast between clinical importance and statistical significance isbarely mentioned. While the computational formula for the number needed to treatis presented, there is no explanation of why this number is important.», «I do have a few nitpicksin the other chapters. The section on randomized studies fails to discuss concealedallocation. Dr. Greenhalgh doesn’t mention the importance of randomized trials inassessing screening tests. She is far too harsh in claiming that case-control studiescannot demonstrate causality», «In general, though, I found myself nodding with approval at almost all of her suggestions», « All of these books are good, but Greenhalgh has far greater breadthof coverage in her book than any of these competitors»

[REVIEW_ONE_PAGE] G Misiewicz — https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1773151/ — «Those embarking on a medical career will find it invaluable but so will seasoned practitioners in any specialty», «Even editors should own it, and my copy will sit on my editorial desk from now on»

[REVIEW_ONE_PAGE] Barry Pless — https://injuryprevention.bmj.com/content/injuryprev/4/1/80.2.full.pdf — «and this book is abundantly helpful», «The appendices are useful and the index isexcellent. The price is right and the authorwrites like an angel.»

[REVIEW_ONE_PAGE] Jose F. Tellez-Zenteno, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada — https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/3E045875B2DC3EF8B80F1E0385CDEBAD/S0317167100118372a.pdf — «As an important recognition for the author of this book, it has been considered in some countries such as the UK as basic literature during training for medical students and pharmacists.», «This is one of the basic books that every medical student and resident of any specialty has to read during training.», «this is one of the books that should be present in every medical library around the world»

Dr Valmae Ypinazar DipTeach, BEd (Hons) PhD, Senior Research Fellow, School of Medicine, Griffith University, Southport, Qld — https://www.racgp.org.au/download/Documents/AFP/2017/Jan-Feb/AFP-Jan-Feb-2017-Book-Review.pdf — «The continued success of this informative book resides in its accessibility: it is clear, well articulated, logical and readable.»

[REVIEW_HIGH_ERUDITION] Ludvigsson, Jonas F., Orebro University Hospital, Sweden — https://journals.lww.com/jpgn/fulltext/2002/11000/how_to_read_a_paper_the_basics_of_evidence_based.30.aspx — «Chapter 4 is concerned with assessing methodological quality, a subject of increasing popularity. The author unfortunately did not reference articles by Jadad et al. and Berlin et al., which to many are the standards in grading the quality of RCT (6,7). Though cohort studies and case-control studies are mentioned in the book, the vast majority of references deal with RCT.», «Chapter 5 deals with statistics, and Dr. Greenhalgh is to be commended for succeeding in explaining so much basic statistics, using so little mathematics!», «In this chapter in particular, it is evident that the focus of the book is the reader, not the scientific writer. For those writing up a meta-analysis, this book is not sufficiently detailed.», «I think this is a fine book and my criticism is minor. However, for the 3rd edition I would suggest more about reader bias», «This is indeed a very fine book. I strongly recommend it to all JPGN readers who have not bought the first edition.»

[REVIEW_ONE_PAGE] Nagraj G Huilgol, Department of Radiation Oncology, Dr. Balabhai Nanavati Hospital, S.V. Road, Vile Parle (W), Mumbai — http://www.bioline.org.br/pdf?cr07034 — «How to read a paperí is an excellent guide book for students, residents and practitioners who lack adequate knowledge of statistical principles involved in clinical trials.», «It is a wonderful guide. Go, grab it!»

[REVIEW_ONE_PAGE] John Ludbrook, MD, Department of Surgery University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia — https://sci-hub.se/10.1111/j.1445-2197.2007.04159.x — «This seems to me a book that every practising surgeon shouldread for pleasure and profit and that every surgical trainee shouldbe obliged to read»

[ADDITIONAL_READING] Флетчер Р., Флетчер С., Вагнер Э. — «Клиническая эпидемиология. Основы доказательной медицины»

Петри А., Сэбин К. — «Наглядная статистика в медицине»

Richard K. Riegelman — «Studying a Study and Testing a Test»

Sharon E. Straus — «Evidence-Based Medicine: How to Practice and Teach EBM»

Ludvigsson, Jonas F. — «Att Börja Forska»

Héctor Eloy Tamez Pérez — «El ABC de la Medicina Cientifica»
-->
1. Гринхальх Триша — Основы доказательной медицины (ГЭОТАР-Медиа, 2006).djvu

<a id="Клиническое-мышление"></a>
## Клиническое мышление

<!--- [PROFESSIONAL_DEGREE] Врач-педиатр — https://gabr.org/as.htm

[NO_SOURCES][NO_OCR][NO_SCEDRECO]

[BOOK_SERIES] Вершина успеха
-->
1. Соколов Андрей Львович — Чему не учат докторов. Врачебные хитрости (Феникс, 2016).pdf

<a id="Медицинская-грамотность"></a>
## Медицинская грамотность

<!--- [PROFESSIONAL_DEGREE] Согласно самой книге, «Работать в медицине я начал в олимпийский 1980 год, а в 1992-м – получил звание врача. 10 лет я отдал работе на «скорой», трудился и в общей реанимации, и в кардиологии, и в спортивной медицине, 17 лет я заведовал службой переливания крови, параллельно исполняя обязанности врача-координатора интернет-конференции»

[NO_PDF][NO_SOURCES][NO_SCEDRECO] -->
1. Звонков Андрей Леонидович — Анализы и диагнозы. Это как же понимать (Эксмо, 2014).epub

<a id="Превентивная-медицина"></a>
## Превентивная медицина

<!--- [PROFESSIONAL_DEGREE] Врач-терапевт — https://www.mediasphera.ru/journal/non-nocere?expanded=true&tab=editorial-board

[AUTHOR_PROJECT] Evidence Based Club — https://evidencebasedclub.org/

[NO_PDF] -->
1. Мухарямова Роксана Рустамовна — Доказательная медицина. Чек-лист здорового человека, или что делать, пока ничего не болит (Эксмо, 2020).fb2

<a id="Псевдодиагностика"></a>
## Псевдодиагностика

<!--- [JOURNALISM_SCIENCE_DEGREE] Сотрудничал с различными журналами и газетами (в числе которых «Вокруг света», «Популярная механика», «Здоровье», «Esquire», «Троицкий вариант — Наука», «Российские аптеки», «АВС») — https://brights-russia.org/enthusiast-russia/alexey-vodovozov.html

[NO_PDF] -->
1. Водовозов Алексей Валерьевич — Пациент Разумный. Ловушки «врачебной» диагностики, о которых должен знать каждый (Издательство «Э», 2016).fb2

<a id="Сон"></a>
## Сон

<!--- [INFO] Шпорк — научный журналист. Редактор — доктор биологических наук, автор монографии «Основы сомнологии» Владимир Матвеевич Ковальзон — https://internist.ru/lectors/detail/kovalzon/ .

[NOTE] Проблеме бессонницы в книге посвящена одна глава «Проблемы бесонницы» -->
1. [Шпорк Петер](https://www.deutschlandfunk.de/peter-spork-der-mann-der-die-epigenetik-populaer-machte.676.de.html?dram:article_id=27537) — Сон. Почему мы спим и как нам это лучше всего удаётся (Бином. Лаборатория знаний, 2013).pdf

<a id="Бессонница"></a>
### Бессонница

<a id="Психотерапия-при-бессоннице"></a>
#### Психотерапия при бессоннице

<!--- [NOTE] Биография Мировского -->
1. Мировский Константин Иванович — Психотерапия функциональных нарушений сна. Методические рекомендации (Украинский институт усовершенствования врачей, 1979).pdf

<a id="Стресс"></a>
## Стресс

<!--- [ACADEMIC_DEGREE] Доктор психологических наук. «В 1973 г. Л.А. Китаев-Смык перешел в только что созданный Институт психологии АН СССР (в лабораторию специальных проблем) и начал теоретическое обобщение полученных им ранее результатов экспериментального изучения стресса.» — https://psy.su/persons/100_psihologov_rossii/psy/124769/

[ACADEMIC_DEGREE_REVIEWERS] Марьин Михаил Иванович — доктор психологических наук, профессор кафедры научных основ экстремальной психологии — https://mgppu.ru/people/114/1586 ;

Окороков Александр Васильевич — доктор исторических наук, действительный член Академии военных наук — https://web.archive.org/web/20140203215752/http://ricur.org/ru/sotrudniki/40-o/13-okorokov-aleksandr-vasilevich

[ADDITIONAL_READING] Китаев-Смык Леонид Александрович — «Сознание и стресс: Творчество. Совладание. Выгорание. Невроз»

[NO_REVIEW] 

[BOOK_SERIES] Технологии психологии
-->
1. Китаев-Смык Леонид Александрович — Психология стресса. Психологическая антропология стресса (Академический проект, 2009).djvu

<a id="Управление-стрессом-и-его-профилактика"></a>
### Управление стрессом и его профилактика

<!--- [ACADEMIC_DEGREE] «In 1992, he earned a Ph.D. degree in motor behavior and sport psychology from University of Florida in Gainesville.» — http://hhd.fullerton.edu/knes/facultystaff/DavidChen.php

[ADDITIONAL_READING] Grebot, Madame Elisabeth — «Les pathologies au travail: Stress, burnout, workaholisme et harcèlement.»

[NO_SCEDRECO][NO_REVIEW] -->
1. Chen David D. — Stress Management and Prevention. Applications to Daily Life (Routledge, 2017).pdf

<a id="Тёмная-сторона-рынка-здравоохранения"></a>
## Тёмная сторона рынка здравоохранения

<!--- [BOOK_OR_AUTHOR_OR_CONCEPT_CRITICISM] The Lancet — https://sci-hub.se/https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanonc/article/PIIS1470-2045(00)00162-5/fulltext . Рабочая критика

[NO_SCEDRECO] 5 авторов-учёных или профессионалов, однако нет редакторов или рецензентов, из-за чего, полагаю, нельзя давать высшую категорию.

[AUTHOR_PROJECT] Quackwatch — alternative medicine criticism, https://quackwatch.org/credential/

[AUTHOR_PROJECT] Center of Inquiry — https://centerforinquiry.org/ , «to foster a secular society based on reason, science, freedom of inquiry, and humanist values»

[NO_AUTHOR_INFO] Robert Baratz, MD, PhD, DDS -->
1. [Barrett Stephen](https://www.scienceinmedicine.org/fellows/Barrett.html), [London William](https://www.calstatela.edu/faculty/william-m-london), [Kroger Manfred](https://foodscience.psu.edu/directory/kv7), [Hall Harriet](https://sciencebasedmedicine.org/editorial-staff/harriet-hall-md-associate-editor/), Baratz Robert — Consumer Health. A Guide to Intelligent Decisions (McGraw Hill, 2019).pdf

<a id="Усталость"></a>
## Усталость

<a id="Утомление"></a>
### Утомление

<!--- Lydia Dotto — Losing Sleep. How Your Sleeping Habits Affect Your Life

[BOOK_SERIES] Достижения в психологии

[NO_OCR] -->
1. [Бодров Вячеслав Алексеевич](http://ipras.ru/cntnt/rus/dop_dokume/minisajty_/bodrov_vya.html) — Профессиональное утомление. Фундаментальные и прикладные проблемы (Институт психологии РАН, 2009).pdf
<!--- [NOTE] Биография Разумова; нашёл лишь заметку, что он был доктором биологических наук — http://nlr.ru/e-case3/sc2.php/web_gak/lc/130198/1

[NO_OCR] -->
1. Разумов Семён Абрамович — Утомление и борьба с ним (Медгиз, 1952).pdf
<!--- [ACADEMIC_DEGREE] Согласно самой книге, Шафранская — кандидат психологических наук

[BOOK_SCEDRECO] Научный редактор — доктор психологических наук (на момент написания книги — кандидат наук), профессор Аркадий Ильич Нафтульев — https://psy.su/persons/100_psihologov_rossii/psy/130239/ -->
1. Шафранская Капитолина Дмитриевна — Утомление и борьба с ним (Знание, 1981).djvu

<a id="Хроническая-усталость"></a>
### Хроническая усталость

<a id="NR-11"></a>
#### NR

<a id="Недостоверная-информация"></a>
##### Недостоверная информация

<!--- [NOTE] «A commercial website for people suffering from symptoms of chronic fatigue syndrome and fibromyalgia is rife with numerous illegal and misleading treatment claims, according to a recent warning letter sent to Dr. Jacob Teitelbaum by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration.» — https://www.chicagotribune.com/lifestyles/chi-fatigue-supplements-illegal-drugs-fda-20120504-story.html . Текст письма — https://quackwatch.org/cases/fdawarning/prod/fda-warning-letters-about-products-2012/teitelbaum/ .

[NOTE][CRIM_SCIENCE_EDITOR] «Научный редактор» — Надежда Никольская, врач высшей категории. Возможно, нарколог Никольская Надежда Викторовна, но более конкретно сказать не могу.

[NO_PDF] -->
1. [Тейтельбаум Джейкоб](https://www.chicagotribune.com/lifestyles/chi-fatigue-supplements-illegal-drugs-fda-20120504-story.html) — Вечно уставший. Как справиться с синдромом хронической усталости (Манн, Иванов и Фербер, 2017).epub

<a id="Практикование-парамедицины"></a>
##### Практикование парамедицины

<!--- [NOTE] Согласно информации с собственного сайта Рокед практикует интегративную и холистическую медицину — https://drsohereroked.co.uk/dr-sohere-roked-gp/ . Эти направления критикуются учёными — https://sciencebasedmedicine.org/integrative-medicine-a-brand-not-a-specialty/ , https://www.skeptic.com/reading_room/why-functional-medicine-is-bogus/ , https://www.forbes.com/sites/sciencebiz/2011/04/21/bad-medicine-at-the-university-of-maryland/?sh=3366fea37326 , https://sci-hub.se/https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00508-020-01637-6 . -->
1. Рокед Сохер — Человек уставший. Как победить хроническую усталость и вернуть себе силы, энергию и радость жизни (Альпина Паблишер, 2015).pdf

<a id="Физическая-активность"></a>
## Физическая активность

<!--- [ACADEMIC_DEGREE][BOOK_SCEDRECO] См. Приложение 4 и далее. Похоже, можно считать, что книга прошла авторитетные написание и редактирование. -->
1. [Всемирная организация здравоохранения](https://www.britannica.com/topic/World-Health-Organization) — Глобальные рекомендации по физической активности для здоровья (ВОЗ, 2010).pdf

<a id="Зоозащита"></a>
# Зоозащита

<!--- [ACADEMIC_DEGREE] Marc Bekoff, Ph.D., is professor emeritus of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology at the University of Colorado — https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/experts/marc-bekoff-phd . Список авторов книги в разделе «Contributors». Содержит десятки профессоров.

[ADDITIONAL_READING] Hal Hersog — Some We Love, Some We Hate, Some We Eat: Why It's So Hard to Think Straight About Animals

[INFO] Нашёл критику отдельных составляющих книги, но не всей или Бекоффа. -->
1. [Bekoff Marc](https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/experts/marc-bekoff-phd) (by edition) — Encyclopedia of Animal Rights and Animal Welfare (Greenwood Press, 2010).pdf
<!--- [ACADEMIC_DEGREE] Большинство авторов имеет учёную степерь, некоторые — нет:

Alicja Czerwińska – aktywistka na rzecz zwierząt,

Dobrosława Gogłoza – prezeska Stowarzyszenia Otwarte Klatki,

Dariusz Gzyra – doktorant Instytutu Filozofii i Socjologii Uniwersytetu Pedagogicznego,

Emil Stanisławski – redaktor i współzałożyciel veganworkout.org.pl,

Piotr Żak – prokurator Prokuratury Regionalnej w Katowicach

[ACADEMIC_DEGREE_EDITORS] Błońska — «Doktor nauk prawnych, kryminolożka, radczyni prawna. Adiunktka w Katedrze Kryminologii i Polityki Karnej Instytutu Profilaktyki Społecznej i Resocjalizacji UW.» — http://kryminologia.ipsir.uw.edu.pl/index.php/test/dr-barbara-blonska ;

Gogłoza — «Doktor nauk prawnych, adiunkt w Katedrze Prawa Informatycznego i Zawodów Prawniczych WPiA UMCS, post-doc na Wydziale Prawa Uniwersytetu Islandzkiego w Rejkiawiku, stypendysta Fundacji Rozwoju Systemu Edukacji, Culture and Animals Foundation oraz Animals and Society Institute» — https://lo6.lublin.eu/index.php/pl/home/absolwenci/292-dr-wlodzimierz-gogloza ;

Klaus — «PhD in law, a lawyer and criminologist; professor at the Institute of Law Studies, Polish Academy of Sciences and in the Centre of Migration Studies at Warsaw University» — http://www.migracje.uw.edu.pl/zespol/witold-klaus-2/ ;

Woźniakowska-Fajst — «Doktorka habilitowana nauk prawnych, kryminolożka.» — https://inp.pan.pl/pracownicy/dagmara-wozniakowska-fajst/

[ACADEMIC_DEGREE_REVIEWER] Kossowska Anna Dobrochna — dr hab. criminology — https://nauka-polska.pl/#/profile/scientist?id=50398&_k=gvf82i

[NO_REVIEW] -->
1. Błońska Barbara, Gogłoza Włodzimierz, Klaus Witold, Woźniakowska-Fajst Dagmara (redakcja naukowa) — Sprawiedliwość dla zwierząt (Polska Akademia Nauk, Otwarte Klatki, 2017).pdf

<a id="Борьба-за-освобождение-животных"></a>
## Борьба за освобождение животных

<!--- [POSITIVE_OR_NEUTRAL_REVIEW] Leonardo Caffo — https://www.ledonline.it/Relations/allegati/663-emotivita-animali-caffo.pdf#page=7 ; Danijel Baturina — https://hrcak.srce.hr/file/147860

[BOOK_SERIES] Flashpoint Series

[NO_PDF] -->
1. Joy Melanie — Strategic Action for Animals. A Handbook on Strategic Movement Building, Organizing, and Activism for Animal Liberation (Lantern Books, 2008).epub
<!--- [NO_ACADEMIC_OR_PROFESSIONAL_DEGREE] [Wikipedia](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Norm_Phelps) — «He was a founding member of the Society of Ethical and Religious Vegetarians (SERV),[3]and a formeroutreach director of theFund for Animals.», «He also published articles, essays, and book reviews in several periodicals: Journal of Critical Animal Studies,[6] Philosophia, Satya, The Animals’ Voice, and VegNews.», «University of Maryland, College Park, BA, history, philosophy, 1958–1962.»

[ARTICLES_IN_PEER_REVIEW] [Philosophia](https://sci-hub.se/10.1007/s11406-008-9119-7) — «“Moderate Animal Liberationism”: Tactical Breakthrough or Dead End?»

[Journal for Critical Animal Studies](https://www.criticalanimalstudies.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/Norm-Phelps-Rhyme-Reason-and-Animal-Rights-1-16.pdf) — «Rhyme, Reason, and Animal Rights: Elizabeth Costello’s Regressive View of Animal Consciousnessand its Implications for Animal Liberation»

[CRIM_NO_NEUTRAL] Ненейтральный стиль; так, автор называет убийства животных «геноцидом»

[R/Ac]

[ADDITIONAL_READING] Norm Phelps — «The Longest Struggle Animal Advocacy from Pythagoras to PETA»

Zamir Tzachi — «Ethics and the Beast: A Speciesist Argument for Animal Liberation»

Valéry Giroux, Renan Larue — «Le véganisme»

Giroux, Valéry — «L’antispécisme»

Марк Бекофф — «Эмоциональная жизнь животных»

Kristof Dhont, Gordon Hodson — Why We Love and Exploit Animals: Bridging Insights from Academia and Advocacy

[SOURCES_BAD] Фелпс ссылается, в основном, не на академические источники

[NO_SCEDRECO] -->
1. Фелпс Норм — Изменяя Игру꞉ Почему битва за освобождение животных так трудна и как мы можем её выиграть (Издательские решения, 2018).pdf

<a id="Создание-веганского-мира"></a>
### Создание веганского мира

<a id="NR-12"></a>
#### NR

<a id="Активист-непрофессионал"></a>
##### Активист-непрофессионал

<!--- [CRIM] Спикер — https://veganstrategist.org/speaking/

[ACADEMIC_DEGREE] На сайте автора нет сведений об учёном звании или работе в профессиональных изданиях — https://veganstrategist.org/over/?doing_wp_cron=1608555034.8435280323028564453125 . Тема не та, чтобы подобные авторы допускались + сносок на источники немного.

[NO_REVIEW] Не нашёл научных обзоров книги на английском, французском и нидерландском языках

[AUTHOR_PROJECT] Ethical Vegan Alternative — https://www.evavzw.be/

[NO_SCANNED_PDF] -->
1. Leenaert Tobias — How to Create a Vegan World. A Pragmatic Approach (Lantern Books, 2017).pdf

<a id="Диалог-веганов-и-мясоедов"></a>
## Диалог веганов и мясоедов

<!--- [ACADEMIC_DEGREE] «PhD, is a Harvard-educated psychologist» — https://www.psychologytoday.com/intl/contributors/melanie-joy-phd

[CRIM] Спикер, коач — https://www.powerarchy.org/melaniejoy

[Автор](https://www.psychologytoday.com/intl/contributors/melanie-joy-phd)

[NO_PDF][NO_SCEDRECO] -->
1. Joy Melanie — Beyond Beliefs. A Guide to Improving Relationships and Communication for Vegans, Vegetarians, and Meat Eaters (Roundtree Press, 2017).epub

<a id="Дискриминация-веганов"></a>
## Дискриминация веганов

<!--- [ACADEMIC_DEGREE] Выпускная квалификационная работа бакалавра. Недостаточно для высших категорий.

[BOOK_SCEDRECO] Руководитель ВКР (выпускной квалификационной работы) — доцент, кандидат социологических наук Светлана Валерьевна Негруль, https://persona.tsu.ru/Home/UserProfile/727 . Можно в категорию «авторитетный рецензент». -->
1. Татаркина Наталья Евгеньевна — Образы веганов в конкурирующих дискурсах (Томский государственный университет, 2019).pdf

<a id="Карнизм"></a>
## Карнизм

<!--- [BOOK_OR_AUTHOR_OR_CONCEPT_CRITICISM] Corey Lee Wrenn, PhD — https://www.simorgh.de/objects/wrenn-critical-review-carnism/ , http://www.coreyleewrenn.com/carnism/ . Для занижения категории, полагаю, недостаточно.
[NO_OCR] -->
1. Joy Melanie — Why We Love Dogs, Eat Pigs and Wear Cows. An Introduction to Carnism (Conari Press, 2009).pdf

<a id="Критика-вегетарианства"></a>
## Критика вегетарианства

<a id="NR-13"></a>
### NR

<a id="Недостоверная-информация-1"></a>
#### Недостоверная информация

<!--- [NO_DEGREE] “Lierre Keith is an American writer, radical feminist, food activist, and environmentalist” — https://www.lierrekeith.com/about/

[POSITIVE_OR_NEUTRAL_REVIEW] Zoë Harcombe, PhD in public health nutrition — https://www.zoeharcombe.com/2011/08/the-vegetarian-myth-lierre-keith/

[BOOK_OR_AUTHOR_OR_CONCEPT_CRITICISM] Ian Wallis, Australian National University, Canberra — «But, the logic is wrong – dangerously wrong! After providing a brief history of the Australian diet, food industry and animal industries, I point out, with some simple calculations, that as appealing as the argument may sound it has no basis», «In contrast to Keith’s book, which displays poor research and a misunderstanding of basic nutritional principles», «There is irrefutable evidence that those who eat a typical Australian diet have far more blood on their hands and are responsible for greater degradation of the environment than are those who choose a vegetarian diet.» — https://meridian.allenpress.com/australian-zoologist/article/38/3/379/135133/Is-vegetarianism-bad-for-the-environment ;

[REVIEW_SELF-PUBLISHING][REVIEW_SMASHER] Ginny Kisch Messina, MPH, RD — «It’s next to impossible to review this book; it is so packed with misinformation and confusion that refuting the claims could be another book itself.», «Keith doesn’t bother with primary sources; she depends almost exclusively on the opinions of her favorite popular authors, which she presents as proof of her theories.», «She just doesn’t understand how complex the research is and she certainly doesn’t know much about basic nutrition. Worse, her conclusions are indebted to the Weston A Price Foundation, a non-credible group that bases its recommendations on the opinions of a dentist who wrote up his observations of indigenous populations in the 1930s», «But Keith insists that a vegan diet will damage us all–she is 100% certain of this–and it is simply not true.» — https://www.theveganrd.com/2010/09/review-of-the-vegetarian-myth/ ;

[REVIEW_LONG][REVIEW_SMASHER] John Sanbonmatsu, PhD — «Despite the shoddiness of their arguments, the critics find credulous readers, not because of the quality or novelty of their ideas, but because their prejudices happen to coincide with the bad conscience of the majority», «This frankly apocalyptic narrative sets The Vegetarian Myth apart from scholarly critiques of animal rights by philosophers on the Right.», «Keith does not bother to provide any scientific evidence for any of her claims. Instead, warning her reader away from the epidemiological literature on meat and plant-based diets, Keith turns to personal anecdote and invective. When not ridiculing vegetarians ad hominem», «Let me be clear: Lierre Keith has written a book-length treatment of animal rights and ethical vegetarianism that ignores everything written on the subject over the last century and beyond.» — https://uppingtheanti.org/journal/article/blood-and-soil

[REVIEW_SMASHER] Patrick Nicholson, a medical physicist — «Lierre Keith’s approach is to scare people by cherry-picking facts, leaping freely from anecdotes to generalisations, and setting up a succession of straw man arguments – that veganism is a quest to defeat death in its totality, that vegans are ignorant of the realities behind arable crop production, and so on.», «At its heart, the book is fundamentally a vehicle for primitivist arguments – that the development of agriculture, and hence modern civilisation, was a disaster» — https://peacenews.info/node/6208/simon-fairlie-meat-benign-extravagance-lierre-keith-vegetarian-myth-food-justice-and-susta
«Myths about "The Vegetarian Myth"» site — https://vegetarianmythmyth.wordpress.com/ ;

[NO_SCEDRECO]
-->
1. Lierre Keith — The Vegetarian Myth. Food, Justice, and Sustainability (Flashpoint Press, 2009).pdf

<a id="Критическая-теория-и-животные"></a>
## Критическая теория и животные

<!--- [ACADEMIC_DEGREE] Согласно самой книге, учёными званиями обладают Виктория Джонсон, Эдуардо Мендьета, Джон Санбонмацу, Джон Соренсон и Деннис Сорон. Остальные — нет, поэтому книгу в третью категорию.

[ACADEMIC_DEGREE_EDITOR] John Sanbonmatsu, «PhD University of California at Santa Cruz, is interested in critical theory, including theories of social change, and political philosophy.» — https://www.wpi.edu/people/faculty/js

[POSITIVE_OR_NEUTRAL_REVIEW][CRITICISM_IDEAS] Marco Maurizi, University of Bergamo — https://sci-hub.se/https://doi.org/10.1163/15685306-12341292 — «if any criticism might be made of this powerful book, it is the absence of a real engagement with the Marxist analysis of society, a failure that must be explained with a somewhat unjust treatment of Marx»;

[REVIEW_LONG][REVIEW_RETELLING] Kris Forkasiewicz, Independent Scholar, Wrocław — https://www.depauw.edu/humanimalia/issue%2005/forkasiewicz-sabonmatsu.html — «Unfortunately, the content of Schopenhauer’s remarks on other animals in On the Basis of Morality did not express any kind of firmly liberationist aspirations, and could not offer hope for a non-speciesist ethics.», «Due to its exercise of deepening the critique of oppression and its potential to inspire a vision of the social world made whole, Critical Theory and Animal Liberation is a highly recommended read.»

[REVIEW_RETELLING] Steve Romanin, a Master’s student in the Critical Sociology program at Brock University — https://www.academicpublishingplatforms.com/downloads/pdfs/jcas/volume1/201112281048_JCAS_vol3_2011_15.pdf — «This text is not, however, beyond critique. Missing from its pages are any overt critical race or queer theory perspectives –palpable and glaring omissions, given the extent to which the book attempts to enmesh various ecofeminist, Marxist, poststructural and posthumanist theories. Indeed, the omissions are made all the more obvious specifically because of the widebreadth of other perspectives offered. A common critique of Marxist or explicitly class-based analyses, the voices of queer theorists and critical race theorists are often left out of these debates and it is especially troubling to see that same pattern emerging here –in this otherwise cutting-edge text.», «Nevertheless, “Critical Theory and Animal Liberation” is an invaluable text for scholars and students of a variety of disciplinary backgrounds.»

[BOOK_SERIES] Nature’s Meaning
 -->
1. [Sanbonmatsu John](https://www.wpi.edu/people/faculty/js) (editor) — Critical Theory and Animal Liberation (Rowman & Littlefield, 2011).pdf

<a id="Интерсекциональная-критика-зоозащитных-движений"></a>
### Интерсекциональная критика зоозащитных движений

<a id="Wrenn-Corey-Lee"></a>
#### Wrenn Corey Lee

<!--- [ACADEMIC_DEGREE] “Dr Wrenn received her PhD in Sociology with Colorado State University” — https://www.kent.ac.uk/social-policy-sociology-social-research/people/1915

[Автор](https://www.kent.ac.uk/social-policy-sociology-social-research/people/1915)

[BOOK_CRITICISM] Alma Massaro, PhD, University of Genoa — https://www.ledonline.it/index.php/Relations/article/download/1256/936

[NO_SCEDRECO] -->
1. Wrenn Corey Lee — A Rational Approach to Animal Rights. Extensions in Abolitionist Theory (Palgrave Macmillan, 2016).pdf
<!--- [NO_SCEDRECO] -->
1. Wrenn Corey Lee — Piecemeal Protest. Animal Rights in the Age of Nonprofits (University of Michigan Press, 2019).pdf

<a id="Инновации"></a>
# Инновации

<a id="Краудсорсинг"></a>
## Краудсорсинг

<!--- [NO_ACADEMIC_OR_PROFESSIONAL_DEGREE] [SlideShare, собственный слайд](https://www.slideshare.net/theory_of_systems/ss-40976797) — «аспирант кафедры маркетинга, Москва, РУДН»

[ACADEMIC_DEGREE_REVIEWERS] Азоев Геннадий Лазаревич, [Государственный университет управления](https://guu.ru/pedagogue/%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%BE%D0%B5%D0%B2-%D0%B3%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%BD%D0%B0%D0%B4%D0%B8%D0%B9-%D0%BB%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%B0%D1%80%D0%B5%D0%B2%D0%B8%D1%87/) — «доктор экономических наук»

Зобов Александр Михайлович, [РУДН, экономический факультет](https://econ.rudn.ru/general_information/cathedras/kafedra_marketinga/) — «кандидат экономических наук»

Ефремов Виктор Степанович, [РУДН, экономический факультет](https://econ.rudn.ru/general_information/cathedras/menedzhmenta_i_marketinga/) — «доктор экономических наук; Тема докторской диссертации: «Концепция стратегического планирования в бизнес-системах» по специальности 08.00.05 – Экономика и управление народным хозяйством.»

[Ti/SMono]

[ADDITIONAL_READING] Хау Джефф — «Краудсорсинг. Коллективный разум как инструмент развития бизнеса»

[NOTE] Если верить обложке и первой странице книги, правильный заголовок «Краудсорсинг для менеджера: новые инструменты для разработки продуктов и управления компанией», если верить второй странице и цитирующим книгу источникам — «Краудсорсинг в системе инструментов и методов менеджмента промышленных предприятий»

[NO_REVIEW] -->
1. Голубев Егор Викторович — Краудсорсинг в системе инструментов и методов менеджмента промышленных предприятий (Креативная экономика, 2015).pdf

<a id="Свободные-инновации"></a>
## Свободные инновации

<!--- [ACADEMIC_DEGREE] — [MIT Management Sloan School](https://mitsloan.mit.edu/faculty/directory/eric-arthur-von-hippel) — «PhD in business and engineering from Carnegie-Mellon University.», [Personal site, CV](https://evhippel.files.wordpress.com/2019/01/evh-cv-.pdf) — «Carnegie Mellon University Ph.D. 1974»

[POSITIVE_OR_NEUTRAL_REVIEW] Rolf A. E. Mueller, Dept. of Agricultural Economics, Christian-Albrechts-University, Kiel, Germany, [International Journal of Food System Dynamics](http://centmapress.ilb.uni-bonn.de/ojs/index.php/fsd/article/download/837/725) — «Perhaps. If free innovators are more likely to respond to such surveys than non-innovators and if the response rates are low, a non-participation bias is likely to be large. Moreover, the surveys are unlikely to represent free innovation in the world.», «Von Hippel and his collaborators have classed the product innovations reported by the free innovators into eleven categories, one of which is "Food and Clothing". Regrettably, the proportion of innovations that fall into this category is reported only for Finland, where it accounts for 12 percent of all free product innovations. Details on the innovations in this category are not provided.», «Note that the inequality makes no allowance for time and risk. Moreover, the framework assumes that innovation opportunities are somehow given, that is, they are assumed to be available at no cost.», «Von Hippel illustrates this claim with two examples. One is whitewater kayaking, the other is the development of surgical instruments by scientists. The first example is apt but, I amafraid, few readers will have any prior interest in whitewater kayaking. The second example fits the definition of free innovation only partially, because scientists tend to develop new instruments not for home consumption but for their jobs, which violates a defining criterion of free innovation.», «The argument of this chapter is this: Because free innovators, by definition, are unconcerned about diffusing their new designs, fewer users will adopt the designs of free innovators than would be the case if the free innovators actively made their designs known to the world.» (*прим. авт.* — с чего бы свободные инноваторы «по определению безразличны к распространению своих инноваций»?), «Closing the chapter, von Hippel suggests that governments –i.e. tax payers -should pay for the diffusion of information from free innovators because the adoption of new design generates social benefits. He does, however, not suggest any limits to such support», «Overall, von Hippel's "Free Innovation" is an important book because it directs the attention of economists; innovation policy makers, and experts from business to an economically significant, socially beneficial, and personally rewarding activity of households.», «I recommend the book to all researchers, policy makers, and business experts with a professional interest in innovation in food and agriculture, even though the book is largely void of specific contents related to food and agriculture.»

John Bessant, Professor of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, University of Exeter, [International Journal of Innovation Management](https://sci-hub.se/10.1142/S1363919617800032) — «The book is built on strong and deep research foundations.», « Certainly it raises a whole string of interesting questions—for example:», «Measured on this scale ‘Free Innovation’ is probably quite a heavyweight with the potential for a big splash.», «It focuses on product innovation but behind that there is enormous scope forprocess and service innovation.», «This is a ‘must-read’ book for researchers, practitioners and policymakers.»

[Is/Mono]

[ADDITIONAL_READING] Eric von Hippel — «Democratizing Innovation»

Eric von Hippel — «The Sources of Innovation»

G. M. Peter Swann — «Common Innovation: How We Create the Wealth of Nations»

Krzysztof B. Matusiak (redakcją) — «Innowacje i transfer technologii. Słownik pojęć»

Charles Leadbeater — «The Frugal Innovator: Creating Change on a Shoestring Budget»

Чарльз Лидбитер — «Мы — думаем. Массовые инновации, не массовое производство»

Stephen Flowers, Juan Mateos-Garcia, Jonathan Sapsed, Paul Nightingale, Grantham Andrew y Georgina Voss — «The New Inventors: How users are changing the rules of innovation»

Генри Чесбро — «Открытые инновации. Создание прибыльных технологий»

Craig Lambert — «Shadow Work: The Unpaid, Unseen Jobs That Fill Your Day»

Robert J. Gordon — «The Rise and Fall of American Growth: The U.S. Standard of Living since the Civil War»

S. Umit Kucuk — Consumer Voice: The Democratization of Consumption Markets in the Digital Age

Дейдре Макклоски — «Буржуазные добродетели. Этика для века коммерции»

Deidre McCloskey — «Bourgeois dignity: why economics can't explain the modern world»

Deidre McCloskey — «Bourgeois Equality: How Ideas, Not Capital or Institutions, Enriched the World»

Ольга Викторовна Бычкова (под редакцией) — Фантастические миры российского хай-тека

David Rowan — Non-bullshit innovation: radical ideas from the world's smartest minds -->
1. von Hippel Eric Arthur — Free Innovation (MIT Press, 2016).pdf

<a id="Интеллект-и-мышление"></a>
# Интеллект и мышление

<a id="Изучение-иностранных-языков"></a>
## Изучение иностранных языков

<!--- [INFO] I couldn’t find Lomb’s scientific regalia; I add he to the “Professionals” category -->
1. [Ломб Като](http://www.sdkrashen.com/content/articles/1996_notes_on_a_polyglot.pdf) — [Как я изучаю языки. Заметки полиглота](https://african.wisc.edu/kato-lomb-polyglot-how-i-learn-languages-berkeley-tesl-ej-2008/) (Манн, Иванов и Фербер, 2016).pdf

<a id="Ключи-для-запоминания-иностранных-слов"></a>
### Ключи для запоминания иностранных слов

<a id="NR-14"></a>
#### NR

<a id="Непрофессионализм"></a>
##### Непрофессионализм

<!--- [NOTE] Гарибян не имеет психологического образования. Даже несмотря на то, что он, видимо, действительно попадал в «Книгу рекордов Гиннесса», из-за огромного самопиара отправляется в категорию «Ad». Нет научных доказательств, что метод надёжный; однако имеется критика — http://filolingvia.com/publ/124-1-0-400 , http://filolingvia.com/publ/124-1-0-1818 

[NOTE_FULL_NAME] Английский без английского. Чудо-словарь ключей запоминания 3500 английских слов (ООО Самвел.ру, 2008)

-->
1. [Гарибян Самвел Агасинович](https://www.kommersant.ru/doc/418986) — Английский без английского (ООО Самвел.ру, 2008).pdf

<a id="Когнитивная-психология"></a>
## Когнитивная психология

<a id="Введение-в-когнитивную-психологию"></a>
### Введение в когнитивную психологию

1. [Hills Peter](https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=MObw1LsAAAAJ), [Pake Michael](https://aru.ac.uk/people/michael-pake) — Cognitive Psychology For Dummies (Wiley, 2016).epub

<a id="Структурно-динамическая-теория-интеллекта"></a>
### Структурно-динамическая теория интеллекта

1. [Ушаков Дмитрий Викторович](http://www.ipras.ru/cntnt/rus/dop_dokume/minisajty_/ushakov1.html) — Психология интеллекта и одарённости (Институт психологии РАН, 2011).epub

<a id="Установка"></a>
### Установка

<!--- [BOOK_SERIES] Психология-классика -->
1. [Узнадзе Дмитрий Николаевич](https://www.bsu.ru/content/page/1415/hec/aismontas/biograf223.html) — Психология установки (Питер, 2001).pdf

<a id="Экспериментальная-когнитивная-психология"></a>
### Экспериментальная когнитивная психология

<!--- [NO_OCR] -->
1. [Бартлетт Фредерик Чарльз](http://www.hrono.info/biograf/bio_b/bartlettfc.php) — Психика человека в труде и игре (Издательство Академии педагогических наук РСФСР, 1959).pdf

<a id="Концепции-мышления"></a>
## Концепции мышления

<!--- [BOOK_SERIES] На острие мысли -->
1. Брокман Джон (под редакцией) — Эта книга сделает вас умнее. Новые научные концепции эффективности мышления (АСТ, 2016).djvu

<a id="Мнемоника"></a>
## Мнемоника

<!--- [INFO] Думчев — рекордсмен России, профессионал -->
1. [Думчев Артур Александрович](https://newtonew.com/columns/arthur-dumchev) — Помнить всё. Практическое руководство по развитию памяти (Манн, Иванов и Фербер, 2014).pdf
<!--- [BOOK_SERIES] В мире науки и техники -->
1. [Лёзер Франц](https://www.bundesstiftung-aufarbeitung.de/de/recherche/kataloge-datenbanken/biographische-datenbanken/franz-georg-loeser) — Тренировка памяти (Мир, 1979).djvu
<!--- [INFO] Лорейн — профессионал, не учёный. Также профессионал Артур Думчев — редактор книги.

[NOTE] Не нашёл свидетельств причастности Артура Думчева к науке, однако в книге он указан как «научный редактор»

[NOTE] Link to Lorayne’s bio

[NO_PDF] -->
1. Лорейн Гарри, [Лукас Джерри](https://www.britannica.com/biography/Jerry-Lucas) — Развитие памяти. Классическое руководство по улучшению памяти (Манн, Иванов и Фербер, 2015).epub
<!--- [INFO] Категория «Профессионалы»

[NOTE] Не нашёл отчество -->
1. [Матвеев Станислав](https://rg.ru/2011/07/14/reg-volga-kama/pi.html) — Феноменальная память. Методы запоминания информации (Альпина Паблишер, 2012).pdf
<!--- [INFO] Foer win USA Memory Championship, 2006; he’s professional — https://archive.nytimes.com/www.nytimes.com/interactive/2011/02/20/magazine/mind-secrets.html ;

Also he’s science journalist -->
1. [Фоер Джошуа](https://www.gf.org/fellows/all-fellows/joshua-foer/) — [Эйнштейн гуляет по Луне. Наука и искусство запоминания](https://warwick.ac.uk/fac/cross_fac/iatl/reinvention/archive/volume6issue1/conwaykilov) (Альпина Паблишер, 2013).pdf

<a id="NR-15"></a>
### NR

<a id="Непрофессионализм-1"></a>
#### Непрофессионализм

<!--- [NOTE] У Степанова нет учёных степеней/званий. Нет сведений во вторичных источниках, подтверждающих, что он — специалист в мнемонике.

[NO_PDF] -->
1. Степанов Олег Анатольевич — Мнемоника. Правда и вымыслы (Самиздат, 2001).epub
<!--- [NOTE] «Получил всестороннее образование в области бизнеса», основными темами были «тренинг продаж» и «техника лекций и презентаций»

[NOTE] Incorrect OCR language -->
1. [Поссин Вильфред](https://coaching-convention.de/wilfried-possin/) — Как развить суперпамять (АСТ, Астрель, 2004).djvu

<a id="Учебники-по-мнемонике"></a>
### Учебники по мнемонике

<!--- [INFO] Профессионалы как автор, так и рецензенты -->
1. [Подлиняев Олег Леонидович](http://pi.isu.ru/ru/about/depatments/pedagogy/teachers/podlinyaev.html) — Эффективная память. Учебное пособие (ИГУ, 2016).pdf

<a id="Новые-медиа-и-интеллект"></a>
## Новые медиа и интеллект

<a id="NR-16"></a>
### NR

<a id="Недостоверная-информация-2"></a>
#### Недостоверная информация

<!--- [ACADEMIC_DEGREE] «Prof. Dr. med. Dr. phil.; studierte Medizin, Psychologie und Philosophie in Freiburg, wo er sich auch zum Psychiater weiterbildete und die Habilitation für das Fach Psychiatrie (1989) erlangte» — https://www.uniklinik-ulm.de/psychiatrie-und-psychotherapie-iii/team/prof-dr-med-dr-phil-manfred-spitzer.html

[FAIL_BIBLIOGRAPHY][BOOK_FILE_WITH_BIBLIOGRAPHY] «Spitzer Manfred — Digitale Demenz꞉ Wie wir uns und unsere Kinder um den Verstand bringen (Droemer, 2012).epub»

[POSITIVE_OR_NEUTRAL_REVIEW][REVIEW_RETELLING] Roberta M. Rãducu, National University of Political Studies and Public Administration — https://www.journalofcommunication.ro/index.php/journalofcommunication/article/download/312/297

[REVIEW_RETELLING] Prof. Dr. med. et Dr. disc. pol. Andreas G. Franke M.A. Professur für Medizin in Sozialer Arbeit, Bildung und Erziehung. Hochschule der Bundesagentur für Arbeit Mannheim — https://www.socialnet.de/rezensionen/13832.php — «Auf jeden Fall beleuchtet Manfred Spitzer wissenschaftliche Erkenntnisse von allen Seiten und stellt sie ungeheuer kenntnisreich aber dennoch verständlich für einen jeden Leser dar und leistet damit einen brillanten Beitrag zu einem brisanten Thema.»

[REVIEW_RETELLING] Monika Chodyna-Santus, Uniwersytet Kazimierza Wielkiego, Department of Pedagogy and Psychology ( https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Monika-Chodyna ) — http://cejsh.icm.edu.pl/cejsh/element/bwmeta1.element.desklight-daae4e8b-e3cf-4ba8-b5b4-6621d6377728/c/Monika_Chodyna_Santus_Manfred_Spitzer_Cyfrowa_demencja.pdf — «Autor Cyfrowej demencjiproponuje wnikliwą analizę wpływu cyfrowych technologii na naszą codzienność,na sposób myślenia i zachowania współczesnych i przyszłych pokoleń. Zachęca do pielęgnowania mądrości,zdolności do refleksji, kontrolowania własnych myśli i pragnień w czasach, w których te umiejętności zdają sięzagrożone. Spitzer przedstawia odważną, dającą do myślenia argumentację, jak niekontrolowane użycie nowoczesnych technologii okrada nas z człowieczeństwa i bezpowrotnie przewartościowuje nasz świat.»

[BOOK_OR_AUTHOR_OR_CONCEPT_CRITICISM][REVIEW_SMASHER][REVIEW_HIGH_ERUDITION] Hanna Dębska, Uniwersytet Pedagogiczny w Krakowie — https://www.academia.edu/17281903/Je%C5%9Bli_cyfrowa_demencja_istnieje_prawdopodobnie_ma_klasowy_charakter_Polemika_z_Manfredem_Spitzerem — «Spitzer nie tyko korzysta z wyników badań wy— biórczo — co zarzucają mu adwersarze (Born 2015), ale też zbyt często zawierza pewnym zdroworozsądkowym przekonaniom. W swoich wyjaśnieniach pomija również pewne ważkie strukturalne kwestie.», «We wspólczesnej psychologii są one jednak znacznie częściej obalane niż potwierdzane (Shaw, Gant 2002: 157—171). Nie ma również dowodów na to, że korzystanie z technologii cyfrowych, szczególnie portali spolecznościowych oslabia więzi spoleczne czyprowadzi do zaniku autentycznych relacji (Katelyn i in. 1999: 249—269; Caplan 2007: 234-242; Carnagey i in. 2007: 178—182).», «Badania neurologiczne nie dostarczają bowiem jednoznacznych wyników, co pomija w swej pracy Spitzer, a co sugeruje, że mimo pozornej rzetelności (ogromna bibliografia) korzysta z prac naukowych i wyników badań wybiórczo, tak by dowieść postawionej przez siebie tezy.», «Jeśli Bourdieu ma rację, to nasuwa się niepokojąca myśl, że Spitzer, prezentując swoje tezy w przestrzeni medialnej, może pod— dawać się jej wymogom, przez co wzmacniać (nawet poza świadomością) taki obraz rzeczywistości, jaki chce ona przedstawić. Dotyczy to szczególnie wzbudzania sensacji, w tym paniki moralnej, która stanowi wspólcześnie podstawowy sposób przedstawiania informacji (Bourdieu 2011).», «Mimo iż wielu wątpliwości dotyczących postawionych przez Spitzera tez nie możemy jednoznacznie rozstrzygnąć, sądzę, że jego największym blędem jest pominięcie w analizie kwestii strukturalnej, moim zdaniem kluczowej.», «Tym samym urządzenia cyfrowe, które mają pewien egalitarny potencjal (z pozoru są zdolne dawać każdemu nieograniczony dostęp do wiedzy), stają się kolejnymi narzędziami petryfikacji struktury spolecznej i reprodukcji nierówności. Zaś książka Spitzera, która moglaby zwracać uwagę na te problemy, w rzeczywistości od nich ucieka, przez co jej autor staje się rzecznikiem dominujących jednostek wyposażonych w kapital kulturowy i/lub ekonomiczny.», «Innymi slowy, Spitzer wpada w pulapkę wynikającą z analizowania problemów spolecznych wylącznie na ptaszczyżnie indywidualnej.», «Ta kontrowersyjna książka przyniosła mu popularność i nawet jeśli jej tezy zostaną w przyszłości obalone, stanie się klasyczną pracą, do której odwoływać się będą późniejsi adwersarze. Wydaje się więc, że Spitzer może liczyć na podwójne zyski zarówno symboliczne (rozpoznawalność naukowa), jak i materialne (zwiększenia Iiczby pacjentów, których przyprowadzać będą zaniepokojeni rodzice).», «Bendyk zwraca uwagę, że książka niepokojąco łączy rzetelne badania naukowe z pseudonauką. Ponadto autor miesza korelacje statystyczne ze związkami przyczynowo-skutkowymi (Bendyk 2013).»

[REVIEW_META][REVIEW_SMASHER] Markus Appel, Constanze Schreiner, Johannes Kepler Universität Linz, Österreich — https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Markus-Appel/publication/259970800_Digitale_Demenz_Mythen_und_wissenschaftliche_Befundlage_zur_Auswirkung_von_Internetnutzung/links/0f31752ebe41e86b08000000/Digitale-Demenz-Mythen-und-wissenschaftliche-Befundlage-zur-Auswirkung-von-Internetnutzung.pdf — «Im Mittel der aggregierten Ergebnisse finden sich keine Belege dafür, dass die Nutzung digitaler Medien zur sozialen Vereinsamung führt, gesellschaftlich-politisches Engagement verhindert oder die selbstberichtete Einsamkeit erhöht.», «Im Folgenden werden wir Mythen zu den Auswirkungen von Internetund Computernutzung hervorheben, die man so oder ähnlich beispielsweise in der populären Zusammenschau von Spitzer (2012a) findet», «Trotz der partiell unsachgemäßen Inhalte ist eine Publikation wie „Digitale Demenz“ (Spitzer 2012a), die den Ausgangspunkt unseres Überblicks darstellte, sehr weit verbreitet und wird in der Öffentlichkeit durchaus zum Teil wohlwollend rezipiert.», «Ferner ist zu vermuten, dass strukturelle Bedingungen auf der Seite von Massenmedien zu einer Verbreitung und Popularisierung einfach auf den Punkt zu bringender, alarmistischer Positionen beitragen (Stichwort Nachrichtenfaktoren, vgl. Maier, Stengel, & Marschall, 2010).», «Darüber hinaus bedienen sich populärwissenschaftliche Texte in diesem Bereich nicht selten neurowissenschaftlicher Darstellungen und Erläuterungen. Diese können zweifelsohne einer sachgerechten Erörterung zuträglich sein, kontraproduktiv erscheint uns allerdings der Einbezug neurowissenschaftlicher Theorien und Befunde, die einen logischen Bezug zu den Kerninhalten vermissen lassen. Dies ist nicht zuletzt aus dem Grund bedenklich, dass selbst irrelevante neurowissenschaftliche Theorien und Befunde für Laien überaus überzeugen wirken», «Diese Mythen finden sich in Spitzer (2012a) unter anderem auf den Seiten 126-127 (soziale Interaktion), 263 (Partizipation), 114 (Einsamkeit und Wohlbefinden), 288 (Übergewicht), 83-84 und 135 (Lernen und Lernspiele), 184 (Schriftsprache) sowie 135 (Aggression).»

[ADDITIONAL_READING] Michael Madeja, «Das kleine Buch vom Gehirn: Reiseführer in ein unbekanntes Land»

Ульрих Бек, «Общество риска»

Jean-François Bach, Olivier Houdé, Pierre Léna et Serge Tisseron — „L’enfant et les écrans”

[NO_PDF][NO_SCEDRECO] -->
1. Шпитцер Манфред — Антимозг꞉ цифровые технологии и мозг (АСТ, 2014).pdf

<a id="Открытое-мышление"></a>
## Открытое мышление

<a id="NR-17"></a>
### NR

<a id="Непрофессионализм-2"></a>
#### Непрофессионализм

<!--- [NOTE] Не нашёл информацию об Институте Арбингера во вторичных авторитетных источниках. Зато в самоописании это “общепризнанный мировой лидер в области изменения типа мышления, лидерства, командообразования, разрешения конфликтов, антикризисного управления”. Похоже на коачинг, не базирующийся на научной основе. -->
1. Институт Арбингера — Открытое мышление. Как выйти за пределы своей точки зрения (Манн, Иванов и Фербер, 2017).pdf

<a id="Память"></a>
## Память

<!--- [NO_SCANNED_PDF] -->
1. [Бэддели Алан](https://www.york.ac.uk/psychology/staff/academicstaff/ab50/) — Ваша память. Руководство по тренировке и развитию (Эксмо-Пресс, 2001).pdf
<!--- [NO_SCANNED_PDF] -->
1. [Конрад Борис Николай](https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=ZM-msS4AAAAJ) — Как запомнить всё! Секреты чемпиона мира по мнемотехнике (Азбука-Аттикус, 2017).pdf
<!--- [NO_PDF] -->
1. [Лофтус Элизабет](https://www.pnas.org/content/102/39/13721) — Память. Пронзительные откровения о том, как мы запоминаем и почему забываем (Азбука-Аттикус, КоЛибри, 2018).epub

<a id="Непроизвольное-запоминание"></a>
### Непроизвольное запоминание

<!--- [NO_SCANNED_PDF] -->
1. [Зинченко Пётр Иванович](https://психологический-журнал-университета-дубна.рф/journal/2013/2/2013n2a1/2013n2a1.pdf) — Непроизвольное запоминание (Директ-Медиа, 2010).pdf

<a id="Продуктивное-мышление"></a>
## Продуктивное мышление

1. [Вертгеймер Макс](http://hrono.ru/biograf/bio_we/wertheimerm.php) — Продуктивное мышление (Прогресс, 1987).pdf

<a id="Системное-мышление"></a>
## Системное мышление

<a id="NR-18"></a>
### NR

<a id="НЛП-коачи"></a>
#### НЛП-коачи

<!--- [NOTE] О’Коннор и Макдермотт НЛП-коачи -->
1. [О’Коннор Джозеф](https://internationalcoachingcommunity.com/joseph-oconnor/), [Макдермотт Иан](https://anlp.org/members/ian-mcdermott) — Искусство системного мышления (Альпина Паблишер, 2013).pdf

<a id="ТРИЗ"></a>
## ТРИЗ

<a id="NR-19"></a>
### NR

<a id="Признаки-паранауки"></a>
#### Признаки паранауки

<!--- [NOTE] У ТРИЗ признаки паранауки: https://nadmozg.com/threads/lzhenauka-po-imeni-triz.293/ -->
1. [Альтшуллер Генрих Саулович](https://wemap.ru/nodes/46) — Алгоритм изобретения (Московский рабочий, 1973).pdf

<a id="Интеллектуалы"></a>
# Интеллектуалы

<a id="Индустрия-идей"></a>
## Индустрия идей

<!--- [ACADEMIC_DEGREE] Ph.D., Political Science, Stanford University — https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/fp_20170213_drezner_cv.pdf

[POSITIVE_OR_NEUTRAL_REVIEW] Игорь Александрович Истомин, кандидат политических наук — http://intertrends.ru/system/Doc/ArticlePdf/2026/ZSeMj3hBwi.pdf — «Его отличает стремление нарисовать честный портрет интересующего его явления. Полученная картина предстаёт завершённой – в ней органично сочетается рассмотрение общего состояния интеллектуального ландшафта, экспертных институтов и практик.», «Вместе с тем степень обоснованности формулируемых автором выводов продолжает порождать вопросы. В первую очередь, они определяются неясностью референтного объекта для сравнения. В этой связи работе не хватает более систематического изложения устройства рынка идей в прошлом, чтобы показать глубину и качественное значение различий.», «Кроме того, на протяжении книги Д. Дрезнер (и чем дальше по тексту, тем больше) для обоснования выдвигаемых тезисов опирается на единичные случаи, примеры наиболее заметных экспертов, опыт распространения отдельных концеп-ций. Вста ёт вопрос – насколько надёжна генерализация на основе столь разрознен-ных иллюстраций? Не превращается ли его труд из систематического осмысления сложного феномена в набор заниматель-ных анекдотов об американской интеллек-туальной среде?»

[BOOK_OR_AUTHOR_OR_CONCEPT_CRITICISM] Dane S. Claussen, Thiel College — https://sci-hub.se/10.1080/15205436.2017.1411697 — «However, Drezner writes very little about how average journalists report on foreign policy or other ideas, and clearly he does not see, or expect, average journalists to be the sources of ideas in theways that Friedman, Krugman, or Zakaria are.», «But there was and is much more to explore here specifically about journalists, journalism, and the news media», «Drezner also is aware of U.S. anti-intellectualism, but he does not explore its connections to his book», «But Drezner offers few solutions: more patient donors to think tanks,bigger university endowments, universities and think tanks improving theirprestige, and more gender and ethnic diversity in the“ideas industry.”This isthin gruel, especially because some universities already have large or evengigantic endowments (his, Tufts, has about $1.6 billion; Harvard’s is about $38 billion), and most universities, with or without big endowments, would not earmark such money for public intellectual work. (To Tufts’s credit, it spendsmore than 5% of its endowment each year, or about $80 million; there’s no word,however, on how much of it, if any, goes for public intellectuals.)»

[ADDITIONAL_READING] Declan Fahy — «The New Celebrity Scientists: Out of the Lab and into the Limelight»

[NO_SCEDRECO] -->
1. [Drezner Daniel](https://fletcher.tufts.edu/people/daniel-drezner) — The Ideas Industry. How Pessimists, Partisans and Plutokrats are Transforming the Marketplace of Ideas (Oxford University Press, 2017).pdf

<a id="Моральная-ответственность-интеллектуалов"></a>
## Моральная ответственность интеллектуалов

<!--- [NO_ACADEMIC_DEGREE] Не нашёл сведений об учёной степени Бенды либо его преподавании в различных университетах. «Benda himself was never part of the French university system» — https://dacemirror.sci-hub.se/journal-article/86d6f9f4532c65ff7b53e462f75d1ea6/schalk1971.pdf#page=19 . Проходит в 4-ю категорию, так как его произведения рецензировались в реферируемых изданиях

[ACADEMIC_DEGREE_EDITORS] Кузнецов Юрий Владимирович, кандидат экономических наук — https://www.nifi.ru/ru/?option=com_content&view=article&id=936 , про остальных членов Редколлегии ничего не нашёл

[TYPE_PHIL]

[POSITIVE_OR_NEUTRAL_REVIEW][REVIEW_LONG][REVIEW_BIO] Robert J. Niess, University of Kentucky — https://sci-hub.se/https://www.jstor.org/stable/380454

[REVIEW_LONG][REVIEW_META][REVIEW_HIGH_ERUDITION] David L. Schalk, associate professor of history at Vassar College — https://sci-hub.se/https://www.jstor.org/stable/285985 — «Today Benda's controversial attack on the intellectuals is often dismissed as unscholarly polemic.», «Those readers who are familiar with La Trahison des clercs may well conclude that the imprecise knowledge of what Benda stood for is deserved. Raymond Aron, author of another, very different, requisitory against the intellectuals, finds Benda's arguments often confused.», «As will be shown in the third part of this paper, the rather specific question of "Who betrayed?" was only a part of Benda's concern in La Trahison des clercs. He attempted to deal with many, if not all, facets of the intellectual's role in modern society.», «This dichotomy is again manifested in Niess's conclusions on Benda's entire career. He is quite severe; Benda made "a catastrophic intellectual error, the error of constant generalization without sufficient regard to facts…"», «Benda's own xenophobia is evident on almost every page, and he indicts the German philosophers, such as Fichte and Hegel, as the first to betray.», «There is much to challenge in Benda's arguments including his assertion that political passions were foreign to great clercs of the past», «In general, however, the correct way for the clerc to act in the modern world is to protest vocally, then submit and drink the hemlock when the State so orders.», «but the world may be a somewhat better place because men like Julien Benda have chosen to remain upright»

[REVIEW_LONG] Davide Cadeddu, University of Milan — https://www.academia.edu/download/51307828/Cadeddu__The_Active_Citizenship.pdf — «At such moments, it has become almost obligatory to refer to Benda, just as his ideas on ‘clerks’ seem to represent, in a more general sense, ‘the necessary starting point for any discussion of twentieth-century social criticism.’»

[REVIEW_LONG] Michael Stark, Akademischer Rat und 1989-2003 Lehrbeauftragter für Neuere deutsche Literaturwissenschaft in Bamberg — https://literaturkritik.de/id/19479 — «Zu Recht gilt er als eine Art „Urtext“[5] für spätere Diskurse über das Versagen von Intellektuellen und die Krisen des intellektuellen Engagements im 20.», «Auf der anderen Seite wirkt es kontraintuitiv und bleibt eine zweifelhafte Rückprojektion, die Mönche des Mittelalters, die hebräischen Schriftgelehrten, die Philosophen der griechischen Antike oder die Propheten der Bibel als prototypische ‚Intellektuelle‘ zu bezeichnen.», «Zu bedenken wäre freilich, dass man ein Pamphlet vor sich hat, das nicht allein die extreme Politisierung der Intelligenz anklagen wollte», «Zwar verfügte er weder über eine soziologische Theorie zum Objekt noch über materialistisches Analyse-Besteck. Für Zusammenhänge zwischen dem kritisierten Geistesverrat und den sozio-ökonomischen Bedingungen der intellektuellen Produktion war er aber nicht blind: Unter anderem führte er Karrierestreben, Statuskonkurrenz und die Sucht nach Anerkennung an.»

[BOOK_SERIES] Политическая наука

[ADDITIONAL_READING] David L. Schalk — The Spectrum of Political Engagement. Mounier, Benda, Nizan, Brasillach, Sartre

David L. Schalk — War and the Ivory Tower: Algeria and Vietnam

Студеникин Александр Иванович (под редакцией) — Интеллигенция в условиях общественной нестабильности

Noam Chomsky — Responsibility of Intellectuals

David Haney — The Americanization of Social Science: Intellectuals and Public Responsibility in the Postwar United States
 -->
1. Бенда Жюльен — Предательство интеллектуалов (ИРИСЭН, Мысль, Социум, 2009).pdf

<a id="Публичные-интеллектуалы"></a>
## Публичные интеллектуалы

<!--- [ACADEMIC_DEGREE] LLD, Syracuse University and etc — https://www.law.uchicago.edu/files/cv/rposner-jan-2015.pdf

[POSITIVE_OR_NEUTRAL_REVIEW] Stephen Presser, London University’s Institute — https://scholarship.law.umn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2037&context=concomm

Blaise Cronin, Indiana University, Bloomington — https://sci-hub.se/10.1086/603378

[REVIEW_RETELLING] Professor John N. Warfield — https://sci-hub.se/10.1002/sres.514 — «It appears that the author is firmlycommitted to the belief that the public intellec-tualmust be an individual operating in the ‘lone wolf’style. In this respect, he seems unaware of thepossibilities of applying established methods ingroup processes where quality controls can beexercised to develop, interpret and publicizematters of public importance. Unfortunately, heis not alone in this perspective, but rather isrepresentative of the general state of affairs.Regrettably the systems community, which talksa good game, is doing almost nothing to fill thegap that is created by the decline in quality of thepublic intellectual that is made painfully appar-ent in this excellent work»

[REVIEW_LONG] Félix Ovejero Lucas, es profesor de Ética y Economía en la Universidad de Barcelona — https://www.revistadelibros.com/articulos/richard-posner-y-los-intelectuales-publicos — «Las tiene a la hora de definir, y en pocas páginas presenta caracterizaciones con pequeñas variantes, y las tiene a la hora de aplicarlas, pues buena parte de los nombres que incluye en cada casilla se le escapan por las costuras de su terminología. Sus listas y rankings, como él mismo reconoce, se han confeccionado con criterios no del todo claros.», «Que como resultado de la aplicación de sus criterios la lista de los intelectuales mediáticos acabe encabezada por Kissinger y la de los académicos por Foucault nos dice bastante de la insuficiencia de las tablas con las que se maneja Posner a la hora de capturar los asuntos que le interesan. Llamar a resultados confeccionados de ese modo base estadística es abusar de las palabras, mostrar poco respeto por los neuróticos protocolos de los estadísticos.», «Su descripción de las relaciones entre los sexos desde la bárbara contabilidad del homo oeconomicus es seguramente un ejemplo de abuso de la extensión de la teoría económica», «Sin embargo, creo que la perspectiva general de Posner resulta oportuna para entender bastantes cosas del funcionamiento de los intelectuales mediáticos.», «La verdad es que, en el escenario que interesa a Posner, jugar al mercado y aspirar a vetar la deshonestidad, tiene bastante de wishful thinking.»

[BOOK_OR_AUTHOR_OR_CONCEPT_CRITICISM] William L. Anderson, Frostburg State University — https://sci-hub.se/https://www.jstor.org/stable/30026006 — «From where demand emanates for these "experts" is another matter, and I am not satisfied with Posner's explanation», «Another difficulty I have with Public Intellectuals is the lack of respect with which Posner seems to treat people who one would think are his allies. For example, he mentions John Lott only once, and that is to attack him.», «The professed shock is a bit much, especially when one realizes that columnists must say their piece in about 750 words, which would never be enough room to satisfy Posner's requirements of proof. Unfortunately, when it comes to the Independent Institute's open letter, Posner disappoints this reviewer even more.», «However, given the unwieldy subject Posner has undertaken, this project may have been doomed from the start to be less-than-satisfactory. Posner is one of the important public intellectuals of our time. Public Intellectuals unfortunately does not rank as one of his better works», «Neither the Times nor Posner disclosed that Larry Ellison of Oracle, a Microsoft competitor, was the source for the Times story. Thus it would seem that Posner broke his own rules regarding thorough research», «However, given the unwieldy subject Posner has undertaken, this project may have been doomed from the start to be less-than-satisfactory. Public Intellectuals unfortunately does not rank as one of his better works»

[REVIEW_ONE_PAGE] Catherine Kord, Smithsonian American Art Museum — https://sci-hub.se/10.2307/4614379 — «Posner wishes to show that the quality of such work has declined in the last forty years or so because of increasing specialization in university education and the consequent lack of general knowledge on the part of the tenured professor who most often now ventures into the public arena. This may be possible, but there is no convincing argument here. A number of earlier "great intellectuals of the twentieth century" are mentioned, but very little is said about their achievements with the exception of George Orwell whose satire is found to be literature rather than a successful prognostication», «A large section of Public Intellectuals is devoted to sides taken and books written by contemporaries, both conservative and leftist found wanting, but there is nothing that indicates this is a fair sample, either of the overall body of work or even the particular argument», «A large section of Public Intellectuals is devoted to sides taken and books written by contemporaries, both conservative and leftist found wanting, but there is nothing that indicates this is a fair sample, either of the overall body of work or even the particular argument»

[NO_SCEDRECO] -->
1. Posner Richard A. — Public Intellectuals. A Study of Decline (Harvard University Press, 2001).pdf

<a id="Интуитивные-теории"></a>
# Интуитивные теории

<!--- [ACADEMIC_DEGREE] [Universidade do Porto, Short CV](https://sigarra.up.pt/fpceup/en/noticias_geral.noticias_cont?p_id=F-1625790385/Short%20CV.pdf) — «1977—81 — Oxford University D.Phil., 1991 — London University D.Sc, 1995 — Natal University D.Litt»

[CRIM_SPEAKER] [Personal site](https://adrianfurnham.com/speech-topics/)

[BOOK_SERIES] International Series in Experimental Social Psychology

[Is/Mono]

[POSITIVE_OR_NEUTRAL_REVIEW][REVIEW_ONE_PAGE] Vicky Rippere, [Personality and Individual Differences](https://sci-hub.se/10.1016/0191-8869(90)90181-P) — «As for this reviewer’s impression of it, I must say that I did not find it easy reading. Despite the precisely laid out structure (the table of contents takes three pages and has over 100 subheadings), much of the coverage seems curiously unfocussed.», «None the less, the book will have its uses. Perhaps the main one is as a source of references for people who would like to take up primary research in this challenging field of study. In addition, investigators already working within the particular branches of social science surveyed in the book may find grist for their respective mills. The chapter on lay theories of statistics, which argues that they do not exist and shows what people get by with instead, might also be useful course reading in introductory classes in statistics for the behavioural and social sciences.»

[ADDITIONAL_READING] Фэрнхэм Эдриан — «Психология. 50 идей, о которых нужно знать»

Adrian Furnham — «Young People’s Understanding of Society»

Daniel D. Hutto, Matthew Ratcliffe — «Folk Psychology Re-Assessed»

Claire M. Zedelius, Barbara C. N. Müller, Jonathan W. Schooler — The Science of Lay Theories. How Beliefs Shape Our Cognition, Behavior, and Health

Darrin Hodgetts, Ottilie Stolte, Christopher Sonn, Neil Drew, Stuart Carr, Linda Waimarie Nikora — «Social Psychology and Everyday Life»

Jeff Greenberg, Toni Schmader, Jamie Arndt, Mark J. Landau — «Social Psychology: The Science of Everyday Life»

Garth J.O. Fletcher — «The Scientific Credibility of Folk Psychology»

Matthew Ratcliffe — Rethinking Commonsense Psychology: A Critique of Folk Psychology, Theory of Mind and Simulation

Щавелёв Сергей Павлович — «Метод практики. Природа и структура»

Щавелёв Сергей Павлович, Касавин Илья Теодорович — «Анализ повседневности»

Andrew Shtulman — Scienceblind: Why Our Intuitive Theories About the World Are So Often Wrong

[NO_SCEDRECO] -->
1. Furnham Adrian — Lay Theories. Everyday Understanding of Problems in the Social Sciences (Pergamon Press, 1988).pdf

<a id="Естественнонаучные-интуитивные-теории"></a>
## Естественнонаучные интуитивные теории

<!--- [ACADEMIC_DEGREE] [Occidental College, CV](https://sites.oxy.edu/shtulman/vitae.html) — «Harvard University, Ph.D. in Psychology, 2006»

[POSITIVE_OR_NEUTRAL_REVIEW] Robert A. Cooper, Pennsbury High School, Retired Fairless Hills, PA, [The American Biology Teacher](https://online.ucpress.edu/abt/article/80/4/318/91869/Public-Perceptions-of-Science) — «Scienceblind provides a very readable introduction to a vast literature on science misconceptions that stretches back to the early 1980s.», «Scienceblind is a book that all science teachers should read, if only to sample the chapters relevant to their discipline, whether it be biology, chemistry, physics, or earth science.», «Scienceblind provides a fine illustration of how cognitive science can inform the practice of science teaching, just as the biological sciences inform the practice of medicine.»

Jonathan Wells, [Evolution News](https://evolutionnews.org/2017/06/logicblind-reviewing-andrew-shtulman/) — «Clearly, Shtulman and other people who call skeptics of Darwinian evolution “science deniers” are confusing a transient opinion poll with science itself.», «Schtulman’s recent book, Scienceblind: Why Our Intuitive Theories About the World Are So Often Wrong, is filled with other confusions, too. The author claims Darwin realized that evolution is a product of mutation and selection (Darwin didn’t know about mutations); he claims Darwin was impressed by finch variations during his visit to the Galápagos Islands (Darwin learned about them only later); and he claims religious believers once burned people at the stake for denying that the Earth revolves around the Sun (Giordano Bruno was burned in 1600 for denying core Catholic doctrines, not for being a follower of Copernicus).», «The first correct concept is adaptation by random mutation and natural selection. Adaptations arise by chance, without regard for the needs of the organism.», «The second correct concept is common ancestry.», «But Darwinian theory has not “refined and expanded human thought.” Quite the opposite! At the risk of being called a “science denier” — or of being told I lack an “evolved mind” — I prefer trusting logical intuitions to entertaining illogical nonsense.»

[REVIEW_BE_CAREFUL] Уэллс — сторонник паранаучной концепции «разумного замысла» и ВИЧ-диссидент

[Is/Mono]

[AUTHOR_PROJECT] [Thinking Lab](https://www.oxy.edu/academics/thinking-lab) — «Members of the Thinking Lab at Occidental College study the building blocks of human thought: concepts. Concepts are the mental structures that allow us to organize and interpret our perceptual experience. They are also the constituents of our beliefs, attitudes, and theories. The average adult possesses over 50,000 concepts, and we in the Thinking Lab are interested in determining how such structures are acquired, represented, and utilized.»

[CRIM_SCIENCE_EDITOR] [Элементы](https://elementy.ru/bookclub/author/5273422/konstantin_aleksandrovich_knop) —  «В 1991 году окончил Одесский государственный университет, где изучал прикладную математику. Преподаватель математики, автор задач и головоломок, член жюри Всероссийской олимпиады школьников по математике». Не нашёл сведений о его учёной степени.

[NO_SCEDRECO][NO_PDF] -->
1. Штульман Эндрю — Сбитые с толку. Почему наши интуитивные представления о мире часто ошибочны (Манн, Иванов и Фербер, 2020).fb2

<a id="Интуитивные-теории-о-проблемах-XXI-века"></a>
## Интуитивные теории о проблемах XXI века

<!--- [PROFESSIONAL_DEGREE] [The King’s Fund](https://www.kingsfund.org.uk/about-us/whos-who/bobby-duffy) — «Bobby Duffy is Managing Director of Public Affairs in the UK and Global Director of the Ipsos Social Research Institute. He leads a team of around 220 researchers in London, Manchester, Edinburgh and Brussels. He has worked across most public policy areas in his career, and has been seconded to the Prime Minister’s Strategy Unit and the Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion (CASE) at the London School of Economics. Bobby is a Visiting Senior Research Fellow at the Policy Institute, King’s College London, and sits on several boards for think tanks and universities, as well as the Campaign for Social Science.»

[REVIEW_CHECK] 2021-7-21

[POSITIVE_OR_NEUTRAL_REVIEW] Peter Mouncey, Editor in Chief, IJMR, Motcombe, Dorset, [International Journal of Market Research](https://sci-hub.se/10.1177/1470785318816580) — «This is a very timely book, providing an international picture of how our views of key issues, and knowledge of facts, differs from reality and the reasons why this happens.», «The parenthesis around “facts” is my own as in today’s cynical world where official statistics are treated with a degree of skepticism, I’m sure some readers will question the basis for the measures of reality presented throughout the book.», «The book is full of interesting, worrying, and thought-provoking misperceptions, such as gross overstating of immigrant levels, unemployment, teenage pregnancy, young adults living with par-ents, crime rates, and wealth distribution.»

[N/ProM]

[NO_SCEDRECO]

[NO_PDF] -->
1. Duffy Bobby — The Perils of Perception. Why We’re Wrong About Nearly Everything (Atlantic Books, 2018).epub

<a id="История"></a>
# История

<a id="Историческое-источниковедение"></a>
## Историческое источниковедение

1. [Богданов Владимир Павлович](http://www.hist.msu.ru/Labs/RusCulture/Staff/Bogdanov.htm) — От Геродота до Интернета. Очерки занимательного источниковедения (Весь Мир, 2014).pdf

<a id="Политизация-истории"></a>
## Политизация истории

<!--- [ACADEMIC_DEGREE] [French Historians 1900—2000: New Historical Writing in Twentieth-Century France, book](https://ipfs.io/ipfs/bafykbzaceaatvv3umumszeu3dltqpo6foohmleiwfnq5qpbntrikxeckuszsg?filename=Philip%20Daileader%2C%20Philip%20Whalen%20-%20French%20Historians%201900-2000_%20New%20Historical%20Writing%20in%20Twentieth-Century%20France%20(2010).pdf#page=274) — «He formally began his doctoral studies in Russian history at the Ecole des hautes é tudes in 1962, complet-ing his doctoral thesis on the February Revolution of 1917 in 1967.»

[POSITIVE_OR_NEUTRAL_REVIEW] Filip Šimetin Šegvić, [Pro tempore: časopis studenata povijesti](https://hrcak.srce.hr/file/273975) — «Pritom autorov jedinstven pristup kombiniranja vlastitog znanja i materijala koji je sakupio čini naizgled nepoveziv katalog problema europske, ali i afričke ili indij-ske historiografije čitkim, iako uvijek ostavlja pitanje nije li samim vađenjem konteksta nekih udžbenika ili javnih mišljenja i sam manipulator, bez obzira na to koliko dobronamjeran ili kvalitetan.», «Upravo je tu možda sadržan, iako ne i izražen, odgovor Marca Ferroa na kritike koje ga ponekad smatraju suviše konvencionalnim po izboru tema.», «Ferro je prema tome, gledajući njegov opus, ali i posebice ovu knjigu, hrabro dokazao kako je upravo to moguće i na području povijesti 20. stoljeća u kojemu su politički lideri i događaji i dalje neizostavni.»

Jean-Michel Dufays, [Revue belge dephilologie et d’histoire](https://www.persee.fr/doc/rbph_0035-0818_1983_num_61_2_5909_t1_0434_0000_1) — «Les propositions énoncées appellent plusieurs remarques. Peut-on cautionner sans réserve la prémisse de l'ouvrage qui relève que notre vision du passé serait «étroitement associée à l'histoire qu'on nous a racontée quand nous étions enfants»?», «Mais ne pourrait-on pas, sinon inverser, du moins dépasser les données retenues, c'est-à-dire l'étude des formes et de leur évolution, que l'on ne peut négliger, et creuser davantage le problème?», «D’un point de vue formel, on peut déceler quelques défauts et lacunes parfois, mais pas toujours, compréhensibles. Ainsi l'absence dans la bibliographie de travaux importants qui auraient pu être utilisés avec profit», «Dans le même ordre d'idées et quoique l'ouvrage vise un public assez large, on pourra parfois regretter 'absence ou l'imprécision de références dans l'utilisation des témoignages, mais la faute n'en revient qu'à l'esprit de la collection dans laquelle le livre est paru.», «je pense, en particulier à la mise au point et aux directions théoriques proposées dans l'article déjà cité de Ph. Joutard (1978), aux enquêtes intéressantes publiées dans l'ouvrage collectif La Saint-Barthélémy ou les résonances d'un massacre, Neuchâtel, 1976 ou encore aux réflexions originales, des pédagogues Cl. Billard et P. Guibbert dans Histoire mythologique des Français, Paris, 1976.», «Je conclurai en indiquant que le travail de cet humaniste, par son ampleur, les risques pris, l'esprit qui l'anime et les problèmes importants qu'il soulève et auxquels il répond (bien que pouvant encore être approfondis et affinés par l'analyse) est à l'heure présente unique en son genre.»

Sadao Nitani, 筑波大学, [Tsukuba annals for the social studies education](https://tsukuba.repo.nii.ac.jp/record/52897/files/TAESS_5-84.pdf) — «ここで行なわれた歴史券科書等を通じての分析は，一回性，多系的発展，現代世界の問題構造・問題性が意識されており，歴史認識のカテゴリーとして因果関係のみならず，機能的関係，意味関係の認識がふくまれている。»

John W. Cell, Duke University, [The Journal of Interdisciplinary History](https://sci-hub.se/10.2307/204502) — «His scope is truly worldwide.», «Ferro's book is highly compressed. He explains that he has avoided the temptation to make a doctoral dissertation out of each chapter.»

Arthur Marwick, The Open University, [The International History Review](https://sci-hub.se/10.2307/40105623) — «implicitly, he provides quite the most magnificent demonstration yet to be published of the use and significance of history in the modern world», «His success in drawing in help from around the world (in addition to his own massive researches) in summarizing the versions of history presented in the different societies is a tribute to his standing as one of the great scholarteachers of our time»

[REVIEW_ONE_PAGE] Richard M. Linkh, [The History Teacher](https://sci-hub.se/10.2307/493394) — «Ferro, the Director of Studies in the Social Sciences at the Ecole des Hautes Etudes in Paris, has undertaken an enormous task. He has examined school textbooks, popular literature, holiday celebrations, pageants and films in an attempt to determine how fifteen societies, representing every area of the world, teach history to their young. As a consequence, his treatment at times tends to be oversimplified and superficial.», «He maintains, for example, that history in the United States between World War I and the 1960s stressed unity and avoided discussions of conflict in an attempt to integrate newly arrived immigrants into the American melting pot. He substantiates this view by referring to popular novels and movies but examines no school textbooks, of the period, nor does he consider the impact on history instruction of such progressive historians as Charles Beard or such educational thinkers as George Counts.», «Nevertheless, Ferro has made an important contribution to the literature on the teaching of history, and The Use and Abuse of History should be read by secondary school and college teachers.»

Dr Beverley Southgate, University of Hertfordshire, [Reviews in History](https://reviews.history.ac.uk/review/441) — «It is given to few to be accorded ‘classic’ status in their own lifetime, but Marc Ferro has qualified twice over – not only for the work under discussion here, but also for his account of The Great War, 1914–1918 (1973).», «But his seeds, if not sown deeply, have been scattered widely, and to good effect; and his work has, to varying degrees, successfully weathered the turbulent historiographical storms of the last two decades.», «and within such parameters, little more can be done than indicate possible lines for further thought and research – some of which have since been profitably followed, and some of which remain matters of contemporary concern», «Since Ferro made that observation in 1981, so much work has been done on the restoration of the memory of Nazism that few can remain unaware of Hitler’s existence and the crimes perpetrated in his name; nor can many remain in doubt about the ideological input of historians if they have followed discussions, such as those of Mary Fulbrook», « In this sense, a seed planted by Marc Ferro has grown and flowered impressively; and more flesh has been added to his skeleton in, for example, Gilmer Blackburn’s study of Education in the Third Reich (1985).», «and, although some of his examples may now seem somewhat obvious and even simplistic, Ferro’s book may still be seen historically as something of a trendsetter.», «‘the ignorance of the problems of Islam… is, except among academics, as uncomprehending as total’ (p. 332). This deficiency has been addressed of late by historians such as Richard Fletcher and Nabil Matar.», «It is the lack of that overall argumentative structure which particularly disappoints, together with the surprising absence of exact references to cited sources. That absence makes it more difficult to check the validity of authorial selection and interpretation – as, for example, in the case of Trinidadian slavery», «Admittedly, a geographically based bibliography provides some evidence for works consulted; but that is not enough for the frustrated source seeker. Further updating, too, would have been helpful, for example, in the case of Poland, where a mere half page is added on the ‘new situation since 1990’», «While, then, The Use and Abuse of History remains a useful text, it is inevitably in some respects a little dated.», «I there reveal my own position, which is in brief that all history is inevitably history-for – that one cannot have a history totally free of ideological input, telling it simply ‘as it was’; which is a reason for welcoming variety and diversity of histories, better seen as complementary than competitive. And from this perspective, Ferro’s own position seems ambivalent.»

[REVIEW_PERSONAL_COMMENTS] «So, with the inevitability of ideological intrusion, our choice of what constitutes ‘use’ and what ‘abuse’ depends upon our own presuppositions – revealing no more than what we respectively approve and disapprove.» — релятивистское заявление в рецензии

Srdjan Milosevic, [Tokovi istorije](https://www.academia.edu/1002311/M_Ferro_The_use_and_abuse_of_history_or_how_the_past_is_taught_to_children_London_and_New_York_2003) — «Knjiga Marka Feroa The Use and Abuse of Historydragocen je doprinos vrsnogistori~ara jednoj zna~ajnoj tematici, naime ciljevima i zadacima nastave istorije.», «Knjiga je, dakle, jedin-stvena celina, ukoliko je sagledavamo kao poku{aj sistematizacije jednog vi|enja istori-je, dru{tvenog zna~aja istorijskog znanja i mogu}nosti njegove upotrebe i zloupotrebe.», «Knjiga Marka Feroa The Use and Abuse of History or how the past is taught tochildren, zna~ajna je kako u infromativnom tako i u metodolo{kom i metodi~kom pogle-du i upoznavanje sa ovom knjigom svakako bi moglo da bude od izvesne va`nosti zaistori~ara u formativnoj fazi, budu}eg nau~nika-istra`iva~a i budu}eg nastavnika.»

[BOOK_OR_AUTHOR_OR_CONCEPT_CRITICISM] Rainer Riemenschneider, [Histoire de l'éducation](https://www.persee.fr/doc/hedu_0221-6280_1982_num_14_1_1122) — «Dans ce vaste panorama il ne manque, pour être mondial, que le monde scandinave et le subcontinent américain.», «Mais ne faisons pas grief à Tauteur de ces quelques contrées inexplorées; constatons seulement qu'il ne dit pas pourquoi il les a omises, tout comme il ne s'explique pas d'ailleurs sur les raisons de son choix quant aux exemples retenus.», «Aussi le lecteur est-il partagé entre l'admiration devant le courage de Tauteur qui a abordé un sujet aussi ardu et les insuffisances qu'une vue aussi vaste présente nécessairement, de l'aveu même de Tauteur. Faut-il davantage saluer la volonté de synthèse qui est incontestablement à l'origine du livre, ou faut-il plutôt constater ce qu'il y a d'arbitraire dans le choix des faits et de leur interprétation?», «C'est là que l'approche devient passionnante, mais c'est également un terrain très mouvant où il est difficile d'échapper à une interprétation hasardeuse et arbitraire. D'un « foyer » à l'autre, le lecteur assiste à un glissement du champ d'investigation : si, dans le premier foyer, le côté « émetteur » du message est seul en cause, le second foyer, par contre, doit être considéré à la fois comme « émetteur » et « récepteur » , pour employer le jargon des sciences de la communication.», «Or, c'est justement ici que le livre n'est pas convaincant. Dans trop de cas analysés, cette « mémoire des sociétés » reste hypothèse de travaU non vérifiée.», «En effet, le champ d'observation n'est pas toujours le même. Si, en général, l'analyse se renferme sur des textes (scolaires, pour la plupart) et sur le cinéma, elle s'élargit pour la France et les USA à l'observation de Tenseignement en classe. L'auteur y a assisté à des cours d'histoUe. Ce sont des expériences très ponctuelles certes (dont U faut bien se garder d'exagérer la représentativité), mais elles contrastent singuUèrement avec les conclusions tirées de la seule analyse de textes.», «Or, Tauteur qui s'intéresse à savoU « comment on raconte ThistoUe » n'aurait-U pas eu intérêt à étudier davantage les conditions dans lesquelles s'accompUt la transmission du savoir historique dans ce Ueu privUégié qu'est la saUe de classe?», «D'autant plus que l'observation directe est salutaire dans la mesure où eUe permet de balayer des préjugés, ce que Tauteur ne semble pas avoir pleinement réalisé.», «Quant à la situation de Tenseignement de Thistoire en Allemagne décrite par Ferro, le clair-obscur devient obscurité totale. Le lecteur se demande s'U s'agit d'un parti pris ou de simple ignorance», «Même chose pour les manuels. Us sont plus ou moins bien conçus, et U y en a d'excellents. Ds se distinguent par leurs approches et par leurs méthodes, reflétant par là les positions extrêmement divergentes de la recherche et de la didactique historique en RépubUque Fédérale.», «A en croUe Ferro, Tenseignement de ThistoUe n'a pas tellement changé « avant, pendant et après Hitler » (p. 129), ce qui l'autorise à résumer longuement le contenu des manuels nazis. Or un survol sur l'évolution des manuels d'après-guerre montre qu'U n'en est rien : l'époque nazie forme une parenthèse, la tendance générale des manuels de l'après-guerre aUant d'abord à une restauration Umitée de 'historiographie weimarienne pour innover considérablement à partU des années 1960 et surtout 1970», «Il est à déplorer que l'élargissement de la vue vers des horizons lointains se fasse au détriment d'une meilleure connaissance des horizons proches.», «Ce livre préparé avec beaucoup d'engagement, de sympathie aussi, aurait gagné s'U n'avait pas été écrit à la hâte. Trop souvent le lecteur se trouve en présence de passages dont U ne sait pas s'U s'agit de textes reproduits en citation ou de périphrases en résumé ; de même, l'origine de certains textes cités n'est pas toujours indiquée.», «A cette imprécision s'ajoute une autre, plus préjudiciable à la clarté du Uvre : Tauteur procède souvent par aUusion, et non par expUcation. QueUe est, par exemple, cette espèce de nouveau traité de VersaUles auquel historiens français et allemands se sont affrontés tout juste hier (p. 8) ? Très peu convaincant également le ton quelque peu catastrophique pour mettre en garde contre une uniformisation de l'interprétation de ThistoUe. Le Uvre n'apporte-t-U pas, en déployant l'extraordinaire richesse des identités collectives fondées dans et par les histoUes (au pluriel !) à travers le monde entier, le plus éclatant démenti à sa propre préface?»

[Is/Mono]

[BOOK_SUPPORT] Министерство иностранных дел Франции и Отдел культуры, науки и техники посольства Франции в Москве

[BOOK_SAME] Marc Ferro — Use and Abuse of History or How the Past Is Taught

[ADDITIONAL_READING] Marc Ferro — L’histoire Sous Surveillance. Science et conscience de l’histoire

Marc Ferro, Philippe Jammet, Danièle Guilbert — Que transmettre à nos enfants

Marc Ferro — Les tabous de l'histoire

Marc Ferro — L’Aveuglement: Une Autre Histoire De Notre Monde

Marc Ferro — Diez lecciones sobre la historia del siglo XX

Marc Ferro — Colonization. A Global History

Marc Ferro — Cinema and History

Marc Ferro — Les Individus face aux crises du XXe siècle: l’histoire anonyme

Marc Ferro — Le Ressentiment dans l’histoire: Comprendre notre temps

Marc Ferro, Gwendal Kerzerho — Le XXe siècle expliqué à mon petit-fils

Marc Ferro — L’entrée dans la vie. Amour, travail, famille, révolte. Ce qui change un destin

Joyce Appleby, Lynn Hunt, Margaret Jacob — Telling the Truth about History

James W. Loewen — Teaching What Really Happened. How to Avoid the Tyranny of Textbooks and Get Students Excited About Doing History

James W. Loewen — Lies Across America. What Our Historic Sites Get Wrong

James W. Loewen, Rebecca Stefoff — Lies My Teacher Told Me. Everything American History Textbooks Get Wrong

Марина Станиславовна Бобкова — Люди и тексты. Исторический альманах. «Заказ» на историю? Актуализация информационного пространства прошлого

Donald Graeme — Lies, Damned Lies and History: A Catalogue of Historical Errors and Misunderstandings

Keith Jenkins — Re-Thinking History

Antoon de Baets — Censorship of Historical Thought: A World Guide, 1945-2000

Antoon de Baets — De figuranten van de geschiedenis: hoe het verleden van andere culturen wordt verbeeld en in herinnering gebracht

Antoon de Baets — Gebruik & misbruik van de geschiedenis

Antoon de Baets — Responsible History

Antoon de Baets — Crimes Against History

Jon Wiener — Historians in Trouble: Plagiarism, Fraud, and Politics in the Ivory Tower

François Hartog and Jacques Revel (edited by) — Les usages politiques du passé
-->
1. Ферро Марк — Как рассказывают историю детям в разных странах мира (Высшая школа, 1992).pdf

<a id="Украинская-история"></a>
## Украинская история

<a id="Диалоги-об-украинской-истории"></a>
### Диалоги об украинской истории

<!--- [ACADEMIC_DEGREE] Касьянов — «доктор исторических наук, защитил докторскую диссертацию на тему: "Интеллигенция советской Украины 1920-30-х годов: социально-исторический анализ"» — http://esu.com.ua/search_articles.php?id=10312

Миллер — «доктор исторических наук, диссертация — "Украинский вопрос в политике властей и общественном мнении Российской империи, 1850–1880-е годы"» — http://inion.ru/ru/about/personalities/miller-aleksei-ilich/

[POSITIVE_OR_NEUTRAL_REVIEW][REVIEW_RETELLING] Плеханов Артемий Александрович, институт этнологии и антропологии РАН — https://docplayer.ru/121184477-5-knig-o-politike-pamyati-svo-e-izuchenie-pamyati-v-sociologicheskom.html — «она, на мой взгляд, представляет собой честную попытку двух профессиональных учёных, историков поговорить о процессах политического использования прошлого элитами России и Украины, как во внутренней, так и во внешней политике, а также о месте историков в этих процессах», «Эти диалоги являются во многом попыткой подать пример того, как российские и украинские историки могут обсуждать непростые и спорные темы и при этом «не становиться добровольно или вынужденно бойцами политики исторических фронтов»»

[TYPE_DIALOGS_OR_INTERVIEW]

[NO_SCEDRECO] -->
1. Касьянов Георгий Владимирович, Миллер Алексей Ильич — Россия — Украина. Как пишется история. Диалоги, лекции, статьи (РГСУ, 2011).pdf

<a id="Капитализм"></a>
# Капитализм

<a id="Коммодификация"></a>
## Коммодификация

<a id="Нерыночные-культурные-практики"></a>
### Нерыночные культурные практики

<!--- [ACADEMIC_DEGREE] [The University of Edinburgh](https://web.archive.org/web/20200927045433/http://www.pol.ed.ac.uk/people/academic_staff/keat_russell) — «BA, BPhil (Oxford). Russell Keat is Emeritus Professor in the School of Social and Political Science, where he was previously Professor of Political Theory and the first Head of School. His academic research is concerned with the ethical character and impact of market institutions, including issues about market boundaries, consumer sovereignty, cultural goods, and varieties of capitalism.»

[Is/Mono]

[POSITIVE_OR_NEUTRAL_REVIEW] Ricca Edmondson, Department of Political Science and Sociology National University of Ireland, [Ethical Theory and Moral Practice](https://sci-hub.se/10.2307/27504320) — «Here, Keat’s arguments have laid down for us a formidable programme»

Peter Lindsay, Georgia State University, [American Political Science Review](https://sci-hub.se/10.1017/S0003055402270367) — «As we have seen, however, articulating appeal will not takeeither camp past the lament, “Yeah, sounds great, too badthe market won’t support it.” Hence, Keat needs also to showwhy practices are not just a desirable, but a just supplement», «The argument has great force, in large part because Keatpresents it with clear and coherent language. There are, how-ever, a few problems here that should not go unmentioned,problems owing to the fact that this is not so much a book as acollection of essays on a theme. As such, and because Keat hasmade little effort to adapt the essays into a single cohesive ar-gument, much gets repeated.», «The more pronounced difficulty with the essays-on-a-theme approach involves the layering-on of supportive butultimately distracting arguments. (…) The trouble is thatmuch of the force of his overall argument can too easily getlost in what sometimes amounts to little more than nitpicking», «Such problems are unfortunate, but they should not ob-scure the value of Keat’s contribution. His plea for perspec-tive on markets offers a much needed reminder of argumentsthat—to continue the earlier historical comparison—havenot had great currency since the days of T. H. Green, L. T.Hobhouse, and R. H. Tawney. It is especially refreshing to seethese arguments reintroduced in the social and intellectualcontext of a very different time»

David Hesmondhalgh, Institute of Communications Studies, University of Leeds, [International Journal of Cultural Policy](https://sci-hub.se/10.1080/10286630903029708) — «Russell Keat is profoundly sceptical about markets yet he grounds his scepticismin a balanced and rigorous assessment of argument and evidence. One of the mostvaluable aspects of his book is that it locates questions about the dominance of themarket in contemporary societies in a sophisticated set of deliberations about humanwell-being.», «But it seems to me not only to providea usually rigorous justification of public funding of cultural goods, it also strongly andconsistently suggests the importance of understanding cultural production, includingthe conditions of cultural labour, but without neglecting the importance of consumption», «Yet as far as I’m aware, Keat’s book has been almost completely neglected incultural policy studies, and in fields such as the political economy of culture, wherequestions of culture, economy and markets are central», «Sadly, the book is availableonly for a princely sum in hardback. It just makes it into the top three million of Amazon’s list of all-time best-sellers. This then is a lost classic.»

Fran Tonkiss, Goldsmiths College, University of London, UK, [Contemporary Sociology](https://sci-hub.se/10.2307/3089584) — «This collection of essays presents Russell Keat's critical engagement with the question of market boundaries over a decade of work in social and political theory.»

Andrew Mason, University of Southampton, [Contemporary Political Theory](https://sci-hub.se/10.1057/PALGRAVE.CPT.9300047) — «I found the book absorbing. The argument is carefully constructed and full of insights. My only serious complaint is that the book is not sufficiently well integrated», «Most of the first part of the book has been published previously as articles. Given Keat’s change of mind, one might have expected him to have re-written these chapters in the light of his new arguments.», «The first part could have been re-conceived as exploring various ways in which markets can underminethe integrity of practices», «I also had some reservations about parts of the argument in the final chapter, for example, the claim that, without extra-market protection, there is a serious and permanent danger that cultural goods, of the character required to enable people to make judgements about the value of the different activities involving consumption, will be under-supplied.»

[ADDITIONAL_READING] Аласдер Макинтайр — «После добродетели»

Russell Keat, Nigel Whiteley (edited by) — «The Authority of the Consumer»

Oliver Bennett (edited by) — «Cultural Policy Review of Books»

Robert E. Lane — «The Market Experience»

Rick Rylance — «Literature and the Public Good»

Mark Banks — «The Politics of Cultural Work»

Fran Tonkiss, Andrew Passey, Natalie Fenton, Leslie C. Hems (edited by) — «Trust and Civil Society»

Don Slater, Fran Tonkiss — «Market Society»

«Moral Markets?» books — https://www.moralmarkets.org/books/

Martha M. Ertman, Joan C. Williams (edited by) — «Rethinking Commodification: Cases and Readings in Law and Culture»

Eelke de Jong — «Markt en waarden»

Kuttner, Robert — «Everything for Sale: The Virtues and Limits of Markets»

Colin C. Williams — «A Commodified World? Mapping the Limits of Capitalism»

Elizabeth Anderson — «Values in Ethics and Economics»

Edward Soule — «Morality & Markets»

Classen Rutger — «Capabilities in a Just Society: A Theory of Navigational Agency»

Debra Satz — «Why Some Things Should Not Be for Sale: The Moral Limits of Markets»

Helen Callaghan — «Contestants, Profiteers, and the Political Dynamics of Marketization»

[NO_SCEDRECO] -->
1. Keat Russel — Cultural Goods and the Limits of the Market꞉ Beyond Commercial Modelling (Palgrave Macmillan, 2000).pdf

<a id="Неолиберализм"></a>
## Неолиберализм

<a id="Анти-неолиберальные-мифы-экономики"></a>
### Анти-неолиберальные мифы экономики

<!--- [ACADEMIC_DEGREE] Doctor of Science in Economics (habilitation degree) — https://sites.google.com/site/sguriev/products-services

[CRIM_DIRECTION]

[CRIM_POSSIBLE_BIAS] Спорные утверждения — «МИФ 7. Политика Франклина Рузвельта помогла излечиться от Великой депрессии», «МИФ 11. Чтобы предупредить безработицу, надо поддерживать профсоюзы и субсидировать предприятия», «МИФ 30. Можно создать эффективный «рыночный социализм» — экономику с государственной собственностью и конкурентными рынками», «МИФ 37. Антиглобалисты защищают интересы бедных во всем мире», «Предприятия и профсоюзы получили право на подписание специальных «кодексов честной конкуренции». Их стоило бы назвать «кодексами против конкуренции»: стороны гарантировали установление минимальной зарплаты, а также единой зарплаты для всех рабочих одной категории.», «К чести президента США, надо отметить, что к концу 30-х гг. он разочаровался в NIRA/NLRA и начал бороться с картелями и профсоюзами.», «Вновь возникнут идеи защиты профсоюзов и отечественных производителей, традиционно популярные в России и во многих западноевропейских странах. На самом деле эти идеи лишь усугубляют бедность и неравенство.», «Теоретически такая система должна быть столь же эффективной, что и капиталистическая, но на самом деле рыночный социализм — это всего лишь утопия.», «С работами идеологов антиглобализма может ознакомиться каждый. Читая их, невозможно отделаться от ощущения дежавю. В манифестах и воззваниях антиглобалистов узнаешь до боли знакомые мотивы — из материалов по истории КПСС, диалектическому материализму и политической экономии.», «Именно это разнообразие жалоб создает впечатление, что антиглобалисты не способны объединиться. Однако попробуем судить по делам. Как ни странно, предложения всех этих движений в конце концов сводятся к одному и тому же — любой ценой ограничить перемещение капитала (и особенно — его переток из развитых стран в развивающиеся).», «Поэтому солидарность пролетариев всех стран — миф, который, по-видимому, сознательно культивируется западными профсоюзами.», «Нужны серьезные усилия по разоблачению несостоятельности антиглобализма и его лицемерной природы по отношению к бедным странам. Необходимы дискуссии с романтиками-идеалистами антиглобализма и с конструктивными антиглобалистами.»

[POSITIVE_OR_NEUTRAL_REVIEW][REVIEW_RETELLING] Положихина Мария Анатольевна, старший научный сотрудник Отдела экономики ИНИОН РАН ( http://inion.ru/site/assets/files/1221/polozhikhina_reziume.pdf ) — https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/2011-02-067-guriev-s-mify-ekonomiki-zabluzhdeniya-i-stereotipy-kotorye-rasprostranyayut-smi-i-politiki-m-alpina-biznes-buks-2010-296-s

[BOOK_OR_AUTHOR_OR_CONCEPT_CRITICISM] Джеффри Соммерс, ассоциированный профессор политэкономии и государственной политики, Университет Висконсин-Милуоки, участник инициативы «Постглобализация», [Известия](https://iz.ru/news/551622) — «Но он был лояльным последователем англо-американской экономической школы, той самой, на идеях которой строилась экономическая политика, породившая кризис 2008 года.», «Сергей Гуриев справедливо идентифицирует коррупцию как важнейшее препятствие для успешного развития России. Однако он серьезно ошибается, представляя приватизацию в качестве решения проблемы.», «Гуриев высказывается за приватизацию российской оборонной промышленности, ссылаясь на опыт США, но он забывает, что именно господство частного бизнеса в американском оборонном комплексе делает его работу крайне дорогой, а цены завышенными.», «Сейчас самое время для обсуждения новой экономики и смещения акцентов на инвестиции в реальный сектор и финансирование производства. Возможно, отъезд г-на Гуриева может, по иронии судьбы, разжечь пламя давно назревших дебатов.»

[INFO] Гуриев о своих экономических взглядах в [интервью BBC](https://www.bbc.com/russian/features-38323056) — «Би-би-си: В этой связи другой вопрос. Как вы видите будущее неолиберальной идеи? С.Г.: Я остаюсь приверженцем того, что вы называете "либеральными ценностями". А именно я считаю, что свобода человеку нужна. Я считаю, что мы должны доверять людям распоряжаться своей жизнью, мы должны помогать тем людям, которые не могу позаботиться о себе сами. Но я по-прежнему считаю, что рынок это лучший способ организации экономики.»

[NO_SCEDRECO] -->
1. [Гуриев Сергей Маратович](https://www.sciencespo.fr/department-economics/en/researcher/sergei-guriev.html) — Мифы экономики. Заблуждения и стереотипы, которые распространяют СМИ и политики (Юнайтед Пресс, 2010).pdf

<a id="Нищета-нового-дирижизма"></a>
### Нищета нового дирижизма

<a id="NR-20"></a>
#### NR

<a id="Ненаучные-утверждения"></a>
##### Ненаучные утверждения

<!--- [NOTE] Главы «Зелёные и экологический империализм», «Мизантропия зелёных». Цитата: «Возможно, тогда они усвоят урок: вместо того чтобы гоняться за химерическим контролем над изменением климата, человечеству необходимо к такому изменению приспособиться (если оно вообще произойдёт), как это ему уже не раз успешно удавалось в прошлом.» Член научно-консультативного совета GWPF — https://www.thegwpf.org/professor-deepak-lal/ . Критика GWPF — https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_Warming_Policy_Foundation . Категория «Ad» как отрицателю глобального потепления — https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_warming_controversy#Scientific_consensus .

[BOOK_SERIES] Библиотека свободы
 -->
1. [Дипак Лал](http://www.econ.ucla.edu/Lal/Lal_biography.pdf) — Возвращение «невидимой руки». Актуальность классического либерализма в XXI веке (Новое издательство, 2009).pdf

<a id="Рыночная-экономика"></a>
## Рыночная экономика

<a id="Бестолковость-повсеместной-рыночной-конкуренции"></a>
### Бестолковость повсеместной рыночной конкуренции

<!--- [ACADEMIC_DEGREE] [Personal site CV](https://www.mathias-binswanger.ch/index.php/cv) — «1988 Abschluss des Studiums der Wirtschaftswissenschaften an der Universität St. Gallen mit Lizenziat. Studienrichtung: Allgemeine Volkswirtschaftslehre. 1992 — Promotion zum "Dr. rer. pol." an der Universität Kassel mit der Gesamtnote "mit Auszeichnung". 1999 — Habilitation an der Universität St. Gallen.»

[BOOK_OR_AUTHOR_OR_CONCEPT_CRITICISM][REVIEW_LONG] Prof. Dr. Michael Buestrich, Evangelische Fachhochschule Rheinland-Westfalen-Lippe in Bochum — [Socialnet](https://www.socialnet.de/rezensionen/10591.php) — «„Markt und Wettbewerb“ an sich anzulasten?», «Eine derartig weit(er)gehende Kritik will Binswanger in seinem Buch nicht üben. Er präsentiert sich vielmehr als (markt-)idealistischer Kritiker der von ihm inkriminierten Zustände.», «Die von Binswanger präsentierten bzw. beklagten Phänomene sind sowohl in der Sache als auch von ihrer Verbreitung her nicht zu bestreiten. Es fragt sich allerdings, ob die Gründe, die er zur ihrer Erklärung ins Feld führt, tatsächlich zutreffen. Sind derartige Resultate der von ihm angeprangerten „Unsinnsproduktion“ lediglich dem Wirken von „Fehlanreizen“ und „inszenierten Wettbewerben“», «Die Antwort auf die Frage, wie das wiederum zusammengeht mit der Idee, dass „richtiger“ Wettbewerb eben kein (staatlich) regulierter sein darf, bleibt Binswanger dabei schuldig.», «Im Kontext seiner Argumentation sieht sie vermutlich so aus: Regulation für den Markt, d. h als Voraussetzung seines Funktionierens ist unabdingbar, Regulierung statt Markt aber schädlich, womit sich allerdings die pragmatische Frage stellt, wo genau das eine anfängt und das andere aufhört bzw. wie viel „Eingriff“ denn in jedem Einzelfall an welcher Stelle nötig ist.», «Binswanger outet sich hier als Anhänger des Ordoliberalismus. (…) Mit dem Wettbewerb, wie er tatsächlich stattfindet, hat diese freundliche Sicht des marktwirtschaftlichen Konkurrenzgeschehens empirisch allerdings wenig zu tun», «Die Top-Banker-Riege zeigt sich von derartigen Anwürfen folglich ziemlich unbeeindruckt und dies zu Recht: Boni stellen nicht nur in dieser Branche eben einen sehr adäquaten und keinesfalls systemfremden „Anreiz“ dar, auf die man nicht verzichten will», «Der Titel des Buches lässt eine grundsätzliche Kritik an „Markt und Wettbewerb“ erwarten, löst dieses Versprechen dann aber letztlich nicht ein. Vielmehr hat man es hier mit einer Variante des volkswirtschaftlichen Mainstreams zu tun, die die „guten“ Potenziale von Markt und Wettbewerb gegen ihre „schlechte“», «Wir halten fest: Der Markt ist eine grundsätzlich nützliche, allen anderen „Verteilungssystemen“ bezüglich „Effizienz und Effektivität“ überlegene Form des Wirtschaftens.», «Dabei werden ihnen offenbar weder Fragen der Bedarfsermittlung, noch solche der Beschaffung-, des Transportsoder der Koordinierung zu unüberwindbaren Problemen, die aber angeblich (Stichwort „Überkomplexität“) ganz wesentlich zum „Zusammenbruch des sowjetischen Plansystems“ geführt haben sollen.», «Das Buch besitzt seine Vorzüge dort, wo Binswanger die Auswirkungen der Ökonomisierung in Wissenschaft, Bildung und Gesundheitswesen aus wirtschaftswissenschaftlicher Sicht sehr anschaulich und verständlich beschreibt, auch wenn man das ein oder andere auch schon in Fachveröffentlichungen anderer Disziplinen gelesen hat.», «Ebenso zeigt sich, dass man komplexe wirtschaftliche Sachverhalte durchaus auch ohne die extensive Verwendung mathematischer Formeln verdeutlichen kann, was den Rezipientenkreis des Titels vermutlich über ein entsprechend vorgebildetes Fachpublikum hinaus erweitert.», «Inhaltlich gestaltet sich die Interpretation der von Binswanger skizzierten Zustände als reale „Verstöße“ in Form von „Fehlanreizen“ oder „inszenierten Wettbewerben“ gegen die Funktionsprinzipien einer idealen Marktund Wettbewerbsordnung dagegen sowohl in Bezug auf die Prämissen als auch innerhalb des Diskurses wie dargestellt insgesamt eher inkonsistent. Sie regt darüber aber zugleich zur grundsätzlichen Auseinandersetzung über die formulierten Thesen an.»

[NO_SCEDRECO][NO_PDF] -->
1. Binswanger Mathias — Sinnlose Wettbewerbe. Warum wir immer mehr Unsinn produzieren (Herder, 2010).epub

<a id="Мифы-свободно-рыночного-капитализма"></a>
### Мифы свободно-рыночного капитализма

<!--- [ACADEMIC_DEGREE] Ph. D., Faculty of Economics and Politics, University of Cambridge — http://www.econ.cam.ac.uk/people-files/faculty/hjc1001/CV-CHANG.pdf -->
[Автор](http://www.econ.cam.ac.uk/people/faculty/hjc1001)

<!--- [POSITIVE_OR_NEUTRAL_REVIEW] Tim Newfields — https://tnewfields.info/Articles/PDF/Newfields-23Things(E).pdf , Glenn Athey — https://sci-hub.se/https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0269094210397428 , Joan Wilson — https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/politicsandpolicy/book-review-23-things-they-dont-tell-you-about-capitalism-by-ha-joon-chang/ , James Crabtree — https://www.ft.com/content/905ef80e-b915-11df-99be-00144feabdc0 , Чон Вон Гю — https://s-space.snu.ac.kr/bitstream/10371/76007/1/13%20%EC%A0%95%EC%9B%90%EA%B7%9C.pdf

[NO_SCEDRECO] -->
1. Чхан Ха Джун — 23 тайны. То, что вам не расскажут про капитализм (АСТ, 2014).djvu

<a id="Функционирование-рынка"></a>
### Функционирование рынка

<a id="HC-2"></a>
#### HC

<!--- [PROFESSIONAL_DEGREE] Не нашёл сведений об учёном звании Харфорда. Работал в «Financial Times» — https://www.ft.com/tim-harford .

[CRIM_SPEAKER] https://timharford.com/speaking/

[POSITIVE_OR_NEUTRAL_REVIEW] Robert Formaini, Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas — https://www.cato.org/sites/cato.org/files/serials/files/cato-journal/2006/1/cj26n1-12.pdf — «Harford is completely mainstream, always entertaining, but some-times unhappily superficial.», «The large benefits of auto transportation are never discussed, only thealleged horrible social costs», «Overall, despite its flaws, Harford’s book can be recommended to anyreader interested in generally interesting discussions of many currenteconomic problems». Formaini — отрицатель антропогенной природы изменений климата — «He writes as if it were an established fact that humans are causing climate change and warming, never even for a moment addressing the reality that there are serious questions that can be posed regarding this hypothesis.»

[REVIEW_ONE_PAGE] Johan Wennström, Student of Economic History Uppsala University — https://ru.booksc.org/book/9621357/6fad71 — «Here, the author unfortunately turns into one of those illiberal economists who use people as a means to reach an end which the economist himself desires»

Jesse S. Hixson, National Center for Policy Analysis — https://ru.booksc.org/book/55638824/e80779 — «This assertion is astonishing, to say the least. Forty percent of U.S. health services are financed through govern ment programs, and 26 percent are financed by business group plans. Insurance purchased by individuals accounts for less than 11 percent of health service expenditures.», «This book is an example of how one economist tries to inform the lay man about economic explanations of many familiar phenomena»

[REVIEW_SELF-PUBLISHING] Jorge Barrientos Marin. Ph.D, University of Antioquia, [ResearchGate](https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Jorge-Barrientos-3/publication/254428023_The_Economics_of_All_Things_an_Emotional_Review_of_Tim_Harford's_Books/links/5f0c6b5292851c38a519bc38/The-Economics-of-All-Things-an-Emotional-Review-of-Tim-Harfords-Books.pdf) — «On the one hand, these wonderful books allow thinking about the economics science like something pretty useful, a very usefultool-box,even for other social disciplines. On the other hand, they allow us professional economists to think to ourselves: “I’m very proud of beingan economist”, not filling ourselves like a bunch of arrogant morons or simply morons.», «Secondly, I could say indeed, that maybe these arethe most wonderful booksabout economic scientific divulgation that I have ever read.»

Declan Trott is a PhD Candicate, The Australian National University — https://press-files.anu.edu.au/downloads/press/p86401/pdf/13-3-br-3.pdf — «Aside from fixed costs, one of the very few areas of basic microeconomics neglected by Harford is the classification of goods based on rivalry and excludability.», «If I had to recommend a single book to introduce a non-economist to the field, or for a lecturer about to teach first year micro, I could not think of a better.»

Pontus Rendahl, PhD i nationalekonomi, lektor vid University of Cambridge — https://www.nationalekonomi.se/sites/default/files/legacy/39-6-pr.pdf

[BOOK_OR_AUTHOR_OR_CONCEPT_CRITICISM] Preston McAfee, PhD Economics ( https://www.prestonmcafee.net/ ) — https://www.prestonmcafee.net/PDF/UndercoverEconomistReview.pdf — «Mr. Harford explains price discrimination (charging different markups to different buy-ers) and, unlike many authors, distinguishes itcorrectly from price dispersion (charging differ-ent prices at different times).», «Unfortunately, the reader is left withthe impression that there are no remaining puz-zles, when in fact much of pricing is puzzlingeven in light of the theories», «Mr. Harford’s statistic(which works out to be about 1 in 400 old peopleannually) should be as horrifying as the FederalEmergency Management Agency, until one per-forms a modicum of research», «Unfortunately, Mr. Harford often has the samerelationship with facts that Bill Clinton had withMonica—one intended to be kept undercoverand not exposed to scrutiny.», «Not nearly so impressive a demon-stration of the concept of the world of truth, butthat is the nature of truth», «It’s like telling students that air-planes fly because they are lighter than air—thetruth is complicated so it’s OK to oversimplify.», «It is achallenge to understand the economics of Chinaand Mr. Harford’s account of China, which is otherwise reasonable though glib, lacks the mostimportant reason for China’s success: Chinaignored the advice of Harvard economists, Russia did not», «Like most partisans, Mr. Harford has agullible willingness to believe anything writtenthat supports his viewpoint, and then presentsonly evidence consistent with his viewpoint, lead-ing him to conclude that his perspective is aproven fact. It is this blind belief in the theorythat often causes economists to be viewed withderision.», «As a reader for high school students, Mr.Harford’s book is preferable to those weightytomes sold as college economics texts»
 -->
1. Харфорд Тим — Экономист под прикрытием (BestBusinessBooks, 2009).pdf

<a id="Конфликт"></a>
# Конфликт

<a id="Диалог-на-сложные-темы"></a>
## Диалог на сложные темы

<!--- [INFO] Шерч — «Ph.D. Conflict Analysis and Resolution, George Mason University»; а вот Кэмпт — спикер, но, похоже, не является профильным специалистом — «Dr. Campt has a bachelor’s degree in Computer Science from Princeton University, and a Master’s degree in public policy from UC Berkeley.» — https://www.davidcampt.com/bio-and-gallery

[INFO] Шерч была директором 3D Security Initiative — https://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php/3D_Security_Initiative

[CRIM] Любительский перевод

[BOOK_SERIES] Little Books of Justice and Peacebuilding

[NO_PDF]
-->
1. [Шерч Лиза](http://activity.scar.gmu.edu/people/lisa-schirch), Кемпт Дэвид — Маленькая книжица о диалоге на сложные темы. Практическое пособие (Good Books, 2007).doc
<!--- [Ti/Mono]

[ACADEMIC_DEGREE] [Expert Gallery Suite, CV](https://web.archive.org/web/20191212051516/https://works.bepress.com/peter-boghossian/cv/download/) — «EdD, 2004, Educational Leadership, Curriculum & Instruction, Portland State University», «Dissertation: Socratic pedagogy, critical thinking, moral reasoning and inmate education: An exploratory study, Dr. Gary Nave, Advisor, 2004»

Lindsay, [University of Tennessee — Knoxville](https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_graddiss/723/) — «PhD in mathematics, 2010, dissertation theme — "[Combinatorial Unification of Binomial-Like Arrays](https://trace.tennessee.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1803&context=utk_graddiss)"»

[NO_SCEDRECO]

[REVIEW_CHECK] 2021-9-11

[POSITIVE_OR_NEUTRAL_REVIEW][CRIM_RELIGION] J. T. Byrd, Brant Wenger, Liberty University, [Eleutheria](https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1190&context=eleu) — «In their book, How to Have Impossible Conversations: A Very Practical Guide, they provide an accessible, step by step, guide on how to develop strategies for engaging in effective conversations with people that disagree about deeply held beliefs on religion, politics, and morality.», «Religious beliefs, especially those held by Christian apologists, are often much more than a mere presentation of rehearsed arguments but involve a rather extensive amount of evidence. While the presentation of arguments may be rehearsed, this does not necessitate that the evidence for said arguments is not both substantial and sound. While some Christian apologists and other religious thinkers or advocates, who are ideologues in the sense of being “uncompromising,” it is somewhat unfair to lump all Christian apologists into that same category. Furthermore, this seems to reveal a somewhat generalized presumption of fideism on the part of Christian apologists, which would be a more appropriate association on a case-by-case basis after having undertaken the strategies for discussion that they employ in this book with a particular apologist.», «One final note on the tension between Boghossian and Lindsay’s approach to conversations and that of Christians is the significant difference in their understanding of evangelism. (…) Although, at several points in the book, they noted that part of the goal in dialogue is to instill doubt in one’s beliefs and use questions, and even some evidence (such as outside sources), to help them reconsider the foundations for their beliefs. These methods are geared toward helping someone arrive or at least be willing to arrive at new beliefs. Thus, while they would likely disagree, the goal of their methodology and that of evangelism is not too different.», «Perhaps their understanding of evangelism, similar to faith, tends to picture a closed-minded “messenger” preaching at their conversation partner instead of collaborating with them. While some evangelistic approaches may operate in such a way, this does not necessitate that this is “unethical,” nor does it mean that all evangelistic approaches operate in such a way.», «Nevertheless, the strengths of this book are numerous, but of the greatest is its proposed stratagem contributing to improving dialogue amidst a very timely cultural discussion centered on defending the value of freely sharing ideas, even when the conversations that need to be had are difficult», «One would be wise to utilize the principles found in this book when having conversations with those who hold vastly differing views, especially those who do hold to strong religious, political, and moral beliefs as they seek to engage with others about their own beliefs and understand the beliefs of their conversation partners.», «While some of Boghossian and Lindsay’s presuppositions may run contrary to the concept of the Christian’s mission to share the gospel of Jesus Christ with others and make disciples, this book is a timely guide that can contribute to the effectiveness of Christian methodologies in their cultural dialogue, apologetic, and evangelistic approaches as they communicate their beliefs in an ever-changing and increasingly intellectually diverse culture.», «Overall, this book is an incredibly helpful and needed guide for making seemingly “impossible” conversations much more plausible for people from a variety of backgrounds.»

[REVIEW_PERSONAL_COMMENTS] «For example, freedom of speech and intellectual diversity are beginning to become more restricted across the country, particularly at many universities. Professors no longer teach how to think but what to think, and all who object are subject to being canceled. Simply expressing a differing viewpoint can even be seen as “violence” against an individual. This attack on free speech has led Boghossian and Miller to form an unlikely alliance.», «Furthermore, they also model how powerful mutual respect and agreement can be in a shared cause, such as their fight for the freedom of intellectual diversity and critical thinking over and against critical theory and cancel culture at the university.» — это преувеличения, см. “We Need New Stories: The Myths that Subvert Freedom” Несрин Малик

[REVIEW_IN_MEDIA] Helio Gurovitz, O Globo [Revista Época](https://oglobo.globo.com/epoca/helio-gurovitz/primo-petista-sobrinho-bolsominion-seus-problemas-terminaram-24093059) — «O tom de autoajuda não deve enganar: trata-se de um trabalho profundo, com 36 técnicas práticas, extraídas das pesquisas de ponta em psicologia, epistemologia aplicada, libertação de cultos religiosos e até negociações com sequestradores.»

[REVIEW_ORG] Floris van den Berg, Universiteit Utrecht, [Liberales](https://www.liberales.be/teksten/2021/3/27/how-to-have-impossible-conversations-peter-boghossian-en-james-lindsay) — «Het is een geweldig boek.», «Als ik mijn optreden in dat programma vergelijk met de aanbevelingen in dit boek dan heb ik er niks van gebakken. Kortom, dit boek geeft aanleiding tot zelfreflectie.», «Ik heb de neiging om in de verdediging te schieten. En dat ga ik ook zeker doen, maar het boek biedt ook concrete handvatten om de dialoog in ieder geval op gang te houden.», «Er is sprake van een bijzonder boek. Het heeft de opbouw van een handen-uit-de-mouwen Amerikaans self help boek, met concrete tips en met verschillende moeilijkheidsniveaus waarvan de auteurs benadrukken dat je echt eerst de onderliggende niveaus in de vingers moet hebben alvorens verder te kunnen met het volgende niveau.», «Het boek is echter ook toegepaste filosofie. Het is een gemoderniseerde versie van de socratische dialoog.», «How to have impossible conversations is een beknopt boek met een uitgebreid notenapparaat met niet alleen verwijzingen naar de wetenschappelijke studies waarop de claims gebaseerd zijn, maar ook met specialistische uitleg.», «Dawkins doet juist erg zijn best om met allerlei gelovigen te converseren over juist de moeilijke onderwerpen. Ik weet niet of deze debatten of dialogen zo krachtig zouden zijn geweest als Dawkins zich geheel aan de aanbevelingen van dit boek had gehouden.»

[REVIEW_IN_MEDIA] Normand Baillargeon, Université du Québec à Montréal, [Le Devoir](https://www.ledevoir.com/opinion/chroniques/577693/l-art-des-conversations-impossibles) — «Je viens justement de lire un excellent livre qui s’alimente à la psychologie, à la philosophie, mais aussi à des pratiques comme celles des personnes qui négocient avec des terroristes ou des preneurs d’otages. L’ouvrage donne de précieux conseils pour avoir ce que les auteurs appellent des conversations qui peuvent sembler impossibles.», «Je n’ai pas pu rendre ici justice à cet important livre, qui nous rappelle l’importance de la conversation démocratique et le fait que celle-ci s’apprend. Mais on conviendra sans doute que voilà des choses que l’école devrait enseigner et dont les adultes devraient partout donner l’exemple.»

[REVIEW_ORG] Sarah Ropp, University of Texas at Austin, [Humanities Institute, Thinking in Community](https://sites.utexas.edu/humanitiesinstitute/2021/06/04/summer-reading-series-how-to-have-impossible-conversations/) — «that both James Lindsay and Peter Boghossian are currently involved in crusades to delegitimize critical race theory and gender studies. According to the article, they also have links to white supremacist networks and have promoted COVID conspiracy theories.», «My first urge was to gut the post entirely. I do not wish to amplify the voices of these authors. I frequently found their tone and rhetoric repellent when I was reading the book, and I find the political beliefs and public behavior described in the Salon article abhorrent.», «I believe that to find bits and pieces of the text that can align, or can be made to align through conscious repurposing, to decolonialist and anti-racist pedagogies is not an endorsement or misreading of the authors. Nor does it (necessarily) erase, excuse, or wallpaper over their harmful ideologies and actions. Rather, it can be an act of resistance against them and those like them.», «I was intensely irritated by the hyper-confident, corporate sales-pitch tone of the introduction, which I interpreted as stereotypically white and male: the authors assure the reader that they’ve “included exactly what you need to immediately have effective conversations across deep divides” (7) based on “proven, evidence-based techniques” (6).», «The book felt like it was going to be gimmicky, full of “tips and tricks” to convert a conversation partner cast permanently as less logical and rational than oneself rather than tools for authentic engagement and mutual respect and learning. As I got into the section on building rapport in the first chapter, however, I slowed down, recognizing many of the “tips” as community-building practices I’ve advocated for (and others as good ideas new to me).»

[NO_SCANNED_PDF] -->
<!-- lint disable write-good -->
1. Boghossian Peter, Lindsay James Stephen — How to Have Impossible Conversations꞉ A Very Practical Guide (Hachette Book Groop, 2019).pdf
<!-- lint enable write-good -->

<a id="Диалоги-о-конфронтации"></a>
## Диалоги о конфронтации

1. [Хасан Борис Иосифович](https://structure.sfu-kras.ru/hasan), [Хромченко Матвей Соломонович](https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%A5%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%BC%D1%87%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%BA%D0%BE,_%D0%9C%D0%B0%D1%82%D0%B2%D0%B5%D0%B9_%D0%A1%D0%BE%D0%BB%D0%BE%D0%BC%D0%BE%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B8%D1%87) — Мир без конфронтации или Да здравствует конфликт! (Бонфи, 2002).rtf

<a id="Межличностный-конфликт"></a>
## Межличностный конфликт

<!--- [ACADEMIC_DEGREE] Wilmot, [Missoulian, obituary](https://web.archive.org/web/20171008080505/http://missoulian.com/news/local/obituaries/william-bill-wilmot/article_0972f1d6-1319-11e3-8316-001a4bcf887a.html) — «His passion for debate developed into an interest in communication, and he earned a doctorate at the University of Washington in 1970.», «He came to the University of Montana’s Department of Communication Studies in 1972 where he had a full and productive career until his retirement in 2000.»,

Hocker, [She Writes Press](https://shewritespress.com/portfolio/joyce-lynnette-hocker/) — «She obtained a PhD in communication from the University of Texas–Austin, and later received a PhD in clinical psychology from the University of Montana. Her academic career as a communication studies professor brought her to Missoula, Montana in 1976, where she began her private practice in 1985.»

[NO_SCEDRECO]

[REVIEW_CHECK] 2021-7-18

[POSITIVE_OR_NEUTRAL_REVIEW][REVIEW_RETELLING] Barbara A. Budjac Corvette, JD, PhD, Associate Professor, Southwestern College, Winfield and Wichita, Kansas, [Sociological Practice: A Journal of Clinical and Applied Sociology](https://sci-hub.se/10.1023/A:1016585730459) — «This book is a complete guide for understanding conflict in all contexts.The authors bring a wealth of research and experience to their holistic andcomprehensive approach in presenting the subject of conflict.», «Key researchersin the area of power are well referenced and utilized in this book», «In summary, the authors have done an excellent job here. The bookis highly recommended for many uses. It will serve as an excellent text inconflict and negotiation, particularly at the graduate level. It will serve asa personal enrichment and learning tool for anyone interested in learningabout the nature of conflict, sources of conflict, types of conflict, their per-sonal approach to conflict, the functions and dysfunctions of conflict, conflictmanagement techniques, conflict confrontation tools, interpersonal commu-nication, and negotiation. It will serve as a self-help book for counselors’recommendations to clients.»

Eugenia Mandal, Instytut Psychologii Uniwersytetu Śląskiego w Katowicach, [Przegląd Psychologiczny](https://www.kul.pl/files/714/nowy_folder/recenzja_2.53.2010.pdf) — «Omawiana ksiąŜka ma charakter naukowego, interdyscyplinarnego podręcznika adresowanego do szerokiego grona czytelników – badaczy, studentów, doradców, trene-rów, instruktorów, wreszcie – do kaŜdego, kto uwikłany jest w jakikolwiek konflikt i szuka naukowej pomocy w tym, jak sobie w takiej sytuacji poradzić.», «Autorzy w kompetentny sposób opisują wszelkie złoŜoności problematyki konflik-tów oraz ich zapobiegania i rozwiązywania.», «Walorem ksiąŜki jest teŜ i to, Ŝe autorzy omawiają strukturę konfliktu w kontek-ście władzy – róŜnych jej źródeł, ocen i percepcji, dynamiki i balansowania», «KsiąŜka ma istotny walor praktyczny. Autorzy zachęcają w niej do poznawania i moderowania własnych sytuacji związanych z doświadczaniem konfliktów interperso-nalnych.», «KsiąŜka, napisana ze swadą i wartkim językiem, przedstawia solidną, dobrze udo-kumentowaną wiedzę naukową», «Autorzy nie tylko opisują róŜ-norodne zagadnienia związane z problematyką konfliktu, ale teŜ podają liczne kon-kretne porady i wskazania mogące zapobiegać powstawaniu negatywnych zjawisk w sytuacjach konfliktowych, a to z pewnością zainteresuje kaŜdego Czytelnika, cieka-wego naukowej wiedzy i profesjonalnych porad związanych z konfliktami interper-sonalnymi.»

[Is/Hb] -->
1. Hocker Joyce Lynette, Wilmot William W. — Interpersonal Conflict (McGraw-Hill Education, 2018).pdf

<a id="Производственный-конфликт"></a>
## Производственный конфликт

<a id="Производственный-конфликт-для-тренеров"></a>
### Производственный конфликт для тренеров

<a id="NR-21"></a>
#### NR

<a id="Коачинг"></a>
##### Коачинг

1. Уизерс Билл — Управление конфликтом (Питер, 2004).rtf

<a id="Психофизиология-конфликта"></a>
## Психофизиология конфликта

1. [Лурия Александр Романович](https://psy.su/psyche/projects/1794/) — Природа человеческих конфликтов. Объективное изучение дезорганизации поведения человека (Когито-Центр, 2002).djvu

<a id="Социальный-конфликт"></a>
## Социальный конфликт

<a id="Базовые-положения-теорий-социального-конфликта"></a>
### Базовые положения теорий социального конфликта

<!--- [ADDITIONAL_READING] Dennis J.D. Sandole, Sean Byrne, Ingrid Sandole-Staroste, Jessica Senehi (editors) — Handbook of Conflict Analysis and Resolution
 -->
1. [Козер Льюис](https://bigenc.ru/philosophy/text/2078648) — Функции социального конфликта (Идея—Пресс, Дом интеллектуальной книги, 2000).pdf

<a id="Критика"></a>
# Критика

<a id="Инакомыслие"></a>
## Инакомыслие

<!--- [Is/Mass]

[ACADEMIC_DEGREE] [Department of Psychology, University of California, Berkeley, CV](https://psychology.berkeley.edu/sites/default/files/cv/cv20.pdf) — «Cornell University, Ithaca, New York: Social Psychology (minor Statistics) PhD»

[NO_SCEDRECO]

[REVIEW_CHECK] 2021-8-23

[POSITIVE_OR_NEUTRAL_REVIEW] Rebecca Mitchell, Macquarie University, Australia, [Organization Studies](https://sci-hub.se/10.1177/0170840619845998) — «However, the messages in this book resonate and are backed by substantial scientific support and indeed my own experience.», «In Defense of Troublemakers does not produce arguments that struck me as particularly novel. Previous research, including studies by Nemeth, have argued and evidenced the value of minority dissent.», «These pieces, however, are limited by their length and have been published over an extended period. In Defense of Troublemakers integrates and extends existing research, drawing in industry and organizational cases to illustrate the practical as well as conceptual importance of dissent.», «In doing so, the book is, at once, a valuable guide for practitioners, and also a springboard for future research into dissent.», «It not only prompts leaders to adapt new behaviours but it prompts researchers to unravel some of the complex mechanisms that account for the impact of dissent and, in particular, its emergence. This may be one of the main limitations of In Defense of Troublemakers», «Nemeth clearly conveys the value of dissent and the challenges that face leaders who want to take advantage of the dissenting voice.», «However, there is less discussion of the antecedent factors. Indeed, I was left wondering what triggers or tools would be most effective for leaders who want to harness the power of dissent.», «Thus, this book provides a compelling case for future research endeavours that seek to understand what predicts dissent and under what circumstances. Despite this limitation, Nemeth provides a succinct and compelling discussion of dissent, which though often overlooked, is undeniably important for organizational decision-making.»

[BOOK_SAME] “No: The Power Of Disagreement In A World That Wants To Get Along”

[NO_SCANNED_PDF] -->
1. Nemeth Charlan Jeanne — In Defense of Troublemakers: The Power of Dissent in Life and Business (Basic Books, 2018).epub

<a id="NR-22"></a>
### NR

<a id="Истории-финансового-успеха-от-первого-лица-1"></a>
#### Истории финансового успеха от первого лица

<!--- [ACADEMIC_DEGREE] «Sant’Anna School Of Advanced Studies (Pisa, Italy), Ph.D. in Economics and Management (2001—4)» — https://www.hbs.edu/ris/Profile%20Files/Gino%20CV%205.27.2020_9663ea28-6bd5-4f37-a7f1-9b4828553a0f.pdf

[CRIM_SPEAKER] https://francescagino.com/speaking-1

[CRIM_BESTSELLER] https://www.rebeltalents.org/learn-more ; см. также отзывы о книге от авторов бестселлеров — https://www.rebeltalents.org/rebel-talent-reviews

[POSITIVE_OR_NEUTRAL_REVIEW][REVIEW_IN_MEDIA] Joachim I Krueger, Ph.D. — https://www.psychologytoday.com/intl/blog/one-among-many/201812/punctuated-rebellion — «Gino’s challenge was to write a book counseling experimentation, risk-taking, creativity, and novelty-seeking without creating a déjà-vu all over again experience. Overall, she succeeds, although perhaps not marvelously so.», «A casual reading of Rebel Talent might give the impression that success in business and life can be found by maximizing rebelliousness. But she who bucks all trends, breaks all norms, and flouts all conventions flirts with disaster. Gino knows this, but leaves it to us to sort it out.», «If a customer enters an exclusive store, even though her casual attire might raise eyebrows, her intention to buy must be really strong. Gino’s interpretation is slightly different. She suggests that the casual woman is sending a signal saying that she can afford not to care. (…) but hey, I'm just a simple country psychologist. The more pertinent examples of the red-sneaker argument are the Zuckerbergs and the Ginos of the world, because they have to project power and competence in order to sell and to teach.», «For Francesca Gino’s book to succeed, it has to be more than good, it has to be the only one of its kind. The former is assured, and the latter very likely.»

Joachim I. Krueger, Department of Cognitive, Linguistic & Psychological Sciences — https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.5406/amerjpsyc.132.3.0392?seq=1 — «The blending of business with biography works well. It embodies the story being told. It is an act of rebellion against the parade of formulaic business books and jaded memoirs.», «She aims to show why it pays to break the rules.», «Yet Gino offers us little guidance on how to modulate our rebellion.», «Alas, curiosity is often discouraged in the workplace. Traditional managers do not like rebels.», «The concrete psychological advice is to cultivate counterfactual thinking. Recalling comedian Stephen Wright, we wonder: What if there were no counterfactual questions?», «This chapter is the only one where Gino’s tone gets a little preachy and self-congratulatory. I think this is forgivable in light of the value she puts on the table in her own Osteria Francescana.», «Rebel Talent does not rebel enough against the formula of the banal business book. As an admirer of Professor Gino’s theoretical and empirical work I feel oddly unfulfilled by the book’s conservative list structure. There is no integrative theory, and Signore Bottura cannot make up for that. A strong theory of rebel talent would make its elements cohere, and it would show their boundaries.», «A strong theory of rebel talent would make its elements cohere, and it would show their boundaries. Nothing brings the need for an understanding of boundary conditions more into focus than the exploration–exploitation dilemma.», «But this begs the question of how he did it. Exploration at all cost cannot be the answer. Being a rebel is risky business. For every Napoleon, Massimo, and Adriano who graces the pages of a business book, there are those who dared and failed. A full theory of rebel talent must also be a theory of risk.», «Finally, there is the interpersonal and strategic side to rebellion. Rebels do not walk around rebelling. They act in environments where others also wonder whether rebellion might be the right choice.»

Harvey A. Hornstein, Professor of Psychology, Emeritus, formerly with the Program in Social and Organizational Psychology at Teachers College, Columbia University — https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/SL-01-2019-159/full/pdf — «Throughout the book Gino skillfully summarizes research findings», «What is missing from the mix is systematic advice to readers about when and how they should offer an innovative idea. After all, making an unconventional suggestion contains peril.»

[ADDITIONAL_READING] Адам Грант — «Оригиналы: Как нонконформисты двигают мир вперёд»

[NO_SCEDRECO] -->
1. Джино Франческа — Сделай это неправильно꞉ Почему бунтари побеждают на работе и в жизни (Альпина Паблишер, 2020).pdf

<a id="Неудобные-идеи"></a>
### Неудобные идеи

<!--- [ACADEMIC_DEGREE] [Personal site, CV](https://bo-bennett.socialpsychology.org/cv/resume.pdf) — «Walden University, PhD in Social Psychology (graduated 2015)»

[CRIM_SELF-PUBLISHING] eBookIt

[CRIM_SPEAKER] [Personal site, CV](https://bo-bennett.socialpsychology.org/cv/resume.pdf) — «Frequent visiting lecturer. Speaking on entrepreneurship, psychology of motivation, cognitive biases, critical thinking, humanism, public speaking, and many areas of business.»

[NO_SCEDRECO]

[REVIEW_CHECK] 2021-7-22

[NO_REVIEW]

[N/ProM]

[NO_SCANNED_PDF] -->
1. Bennett Bo — Uncomfortable Ideas (eBookIt, 2016).pdf

<a id="Критическое-мышление"></a>
# Критическое мышление

<a id="Введение-в-критическое-мышление"></a>
## Введение в критическое мышление

<!--- [INFO] Согласно сайту университета, Чатфилд — доктор. Уточнений не нашёл.

[INFO] Не нашёл информации о рецензентах.

[CRIM_SPEAKER] https://www.ted.com/speakers/tom_chatfield -->
1. [Чатфилд Том](https://www.oii.ox.ac.uk/people/tom-chatfield/) — Критическое мышление. Анализируй, сомневайся, формируй своё мнение (Альпина Паблишер, 2019).pdf

<a id="Оценка-информации"></a>
## Оценка информации

<!--- [CRIM_SCIENCE_EDITOR] Надежда Шихова — редактор и переводчик книг по математике, https://yandex.ru/q/profile/mjdhc15yxkqa4rmga97kfc2rg0/

[ACADEMIC_DEGREE] Ph.D., Cognitive Psychology, 1996

[INFO] Критика — https://medium.com/@marcusbanks/daniel-levitin-is-misinformed-about-peer-review-and-open-access-journals-b74d7281c19d . Критика к отдельным моментам насчёт peer review, а не ко всей книге. Категорию не снижаем.

[ADDITIONAL_READING] Кен Уилбер — Трамп и эпоха постправды

Митико Какутани — Смерть правды

[BOOK_SERIES] Библиотека фонда Эволюция

[CRIM] Спикер — https://www.ted.com/speakers/daniel_levitin -->
1. [Левитин Даниэль](https://static1.squarespace.com/static/5df289518a8734580f17ebf9/t/5e16b0930c5a17560b5cd582/1578545304682/Levitin+Vita_6.JAN.2020.pdf) — Путеводитель по лжи. Критическое мышление в эпоху постправды (Манн, Иванов и Фербер, 2018).pdf

<a id="Психология-критического-мышления"></a>
## Психология критического мышления

<!--- [ADDITIONAL_READING] Leo A. Groarke, Christopher W. Tindale — Good Reasoning Matters! A Constructive Approach to Critical Thinking -->
1. [Халперн Дайана](https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=VBDCDAwAAAAJ) — Психология критического мышления (Питер, 2000).djvu

<a id="Развитие-критического-мышления"></a>
## Развитие критического мышления

1. Ружиэйро Винсент Райан — Мышление. Пятнадцать уроков для начинающих авторов (Флинта, Наука, 2006).pdf

<a id="Учебники-по-критическому-мышлению"></a>
## Учебники по критическому мышлению

<!--- [ADDITIONAL_READING] Peg Tittle — Critical Thinking. An Appeal to Reason -->
1. [Bowell Tracy](https://www.waikato.ac.nz/staff-profiles/people/taboo), [Cowan Robert](https://www.gla.ac.uk/schools/humanities/staff/robertcowan/), [Kemp Gary](https://www.gla.ac.uk/schools/humanities/staff/garykemp/) — Critical Thinking. A Concise Guide (Routledge, 2015).pdf
1. [Foresman Galen](https://www.ncat.edu/employee-bio.php?directoryID=206095425), [Fosl Peter](https://www.transy.edu/academics/faculty/pfosl/), [Watson Jamie Carlin](https://humanities.uams.edu/faculty/jamie-carlin-watson-phd/) — Critical Thinking Toolkit. A Compendium of Concepts and Methods for Reasoning (Wiley-Blackwell, 2017).pdf

<a id="Ружиэйро-Винсент-Райан"></a>
### Ружиэйро Винсент Райан

<!--- [INFO] Автор не является профессионалом. Но ссылается на источники достаточно для присвоения категории R по Кристинограду. 

[Автор](https://college.cengage.com/collegesurvival/resources/students/authors/v_ruggiero.html)
-->
1. Ruggiero Vincent Ryan — Becoming a Critical Thinker (Houghton Mifflin, 2009).pdf
1. Ruggiero Vincent Ryan — Beyond Feelings. A Guide to Critical Thinking (McGraw-Hill, 2011).pdf

<a id="Культура"></a>
# Культура

<a id="Книгоиздание"></a>
## Книгоиздание

<a id="Превращение-книгоиздания-в-индустрию-потребления"></a>
### Превращение книгоиздания в индустрию потребления

<!--- [PROFESSIONAL_DEGREE] [The New Press, obituary](https://thenewpress.com/sites/default/files/email-images/Andre_Schiffrin_program_lo%20res.pdf) by Anya Shiffrin — «Ensconced on the Upper West Side, André would spend a lifetime in book publishing. He began at New American Library, and then stepped into his father’s long-vacant shoes at Pantheon Books when he was first hired as a junior editor in 1962. His last publishing job was at The New Press, which he founded with former Pantheon colleagues Diane Wachtell and David Sternbach.»

[N/BioM]

[POSITIVE_OR_NEUTRAL_REVIEW][REVIEW_RETELLING] Волкова Наталья Васильевна, Тверской государственный университет, [Вестник Тверского государственного университета](https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/83100131.pdf) — «А. Шиффрин видит выход из сложившейся ситуации в ряде мер. По оценке отечественных книгоиздателей, хотя «многие его идеи утопичны, но не бессмысленны»», «Но это вполне возможно, особенно если помнить слова А. Шиффрина о том, что испокон книжным делом занимались джентльмены, заботящиеся не только о сиюминутном, но и – главное – о будущем.»

Elaine Harger, W. Haywood Burns School, [College & Research Libraries](https://crl.acrl.org/index.php/crl/article/viewFile/15481/16927) — «An intimate, insider’s account of the publishing industry over the past fifty-something years, this diary-sized gray tome—with cigar-chomping capitalist on the dust jacket leafing through his greenbacks while grinding a boot heel into the back of a reader struggling to save philosophy from under a wobbly table leg—is bound to infuriate anyone who values the life of the mind as it grapples with and shapes social life.», «The Business of Books should be read by every librarian in the country and should inform our practice. Moreover, it should be read by every person who cares about the role that intellectual life plays within society. Big business is making a mockery of First Amendment guarantees of a free press by prioritizing profit over ideas. Multiple copies of The Business of Books should be purchased by every public and academic library in the country, with one copy displayed alongside Oprah’s latest pick. No need to worry about shelf space, three copies of Schiffrin will displace only one of Steele or King.»

Simone Murray, English, Media Studies and Art History. University of Queensland, [Media International Australia incorporating Culture and Policy](https://sci-hub.se/10.1177/1329878X0210300127) — «But with the appearance in paperback of Andre Schiffrin's The Business of Books, publishing studies may have found the key text for which it has been searching.», «Yet the gist of Schiffrin's diagnosis of contemporary publishing's woes is unimpeachable: to compete with other media industries in an increasingly image-oriented society, book publishing ties itself in knots pretending to be something it is not.»

Stephen E. Wiberley, [Johns Hopkins University Press, Portal: Libraries and the Academy](https://sci-hub.se/10.1353/pla.2001.0061) — «André Schiffrin has published manybooks that encouraged debate on impor-tant issues. Now he has written one»

Alan B. Albarran, Department of Radio, Television and Film, University of North Texas, [Journal of Media Economics](https://sci-hub.se/10.1207/S15327736ME1403_5) — «The Business of Bookslacks any tables, charts, or pedagogical material; it would have limited value as a text in most college courses. But as a reference work on the publishing industry, the book is a welcome addition to the literature»

João Paulo Martinez Hildebrandt, mestrando em Teoria da Literatura e Literatura Comparada noPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Letras da Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, UERJ, [NESPE - Núcleo de estratégias e políticas editoriais](https://www.nespe.com.br/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/Joa%cc%83o-Paulo-M.-Hildebrandt-SCHIFFRIN-O-nego%cc%81cio-dos-livros-nova.pdf) — «Suas ideias, sugerir alternativas a editores acuados e confrontar seu diagnóstico, originalmente inspirado no estado de coisas do universo editorial anglo-saxão, com as realidades locais com as quais se deparava.», «Ainda que tingido pela melancolia que lhe causa o cenário contemporâneo da circulação de ideias no mundo, seu discurso nunca descamba para uma lamentação estéril. Schiffrin é quase sempre propositivo.»

[REVIEW_NO_ACCESS] Wallace, Thomas C, [Publishing Research Quarterly](https://search.proquest.com/openview/126b55a5f95d8251ad7c17d65787b81b)

[ADDITIONAL_READING] Андре Шиффрин — «Слова и деньги»

André Schiffrin — «L’édition sans éditeurs»

André Schiffrin — «Le contrôle de la parole»

Роже Шартье — «Письменная культура и общество»

Albert N. Greco — «The Book Publishing Industry»

Gabriel Zaid — «So Many Books: Reading and Publishing in an Age of Abundance»

Ralph Nader — «The Big Boys»

James W. Loewen — «Lies Across America: What Our Historic Sites Get Wrong»

James W. Loewen — «Lies My Teacher Told Me: Everything American History Textbooks Get Wrong»

James W. Loewen — «Teaching What Really Happened. How to Avoid the Tyranny of Textbooks and Get Students Excited About Doing History»

Jason Epstein — «Book business: publishing past, present and future»

Simone Murray — «The digital literary sphere : reading, writing, and selling books in the Internet era»

[BOOK_SERIES] Библиотека журнала «Неприкосновенный запас»

[NO_SCEDRECO][NO_SOURCES] -->
1. Шиффрин Андре — Легко ли быть издателем？ Как транснациональные концерны завладели книжным рынком и отучили нас читать (НЛО, 2002).pdf

<a id="Культурные-индустрии"></a>
## Культурные индустрии

<!--- [ACADEMIC_DEGREE] [University of Leeds, School of Media and Communication, CV](https://ahc.leeds.ac.uk/media/staff/297/professor-david-hesmondhalgh) — «I did my PhD in the 1990s at Goldsmiths, University of London, on independent record companies and their links with punk, post-punk and rave culture, supervised by Georgina Born.»

[CRIM_SCIENCE_EDITOR][NO_EDITOR_INFO] Не нашёл информацию об Алёне Михалёвой, какая у неё учёная степень

[BOOK_SERIES] Исследования культуры

[Is/Mono]

[POSITIVE_OR_NEUTRAL_REVIEW] Jaka Primorac, [Revija za Sociologiju](https://bib.irb.hr/datoteka/191043.hesmondhalgh-revija-jaka.pdf) — «Kao vodic kroz kulturne industrije, knjiga Davida Hesmondhalgha vrlo je vazan korak prema adekvatnoj analizi tog podrucja koje je dosta zanemareno kako u politickoj ekonomiji tako i u sociologiji.», «Hes-mondhalghu se mora zamjeriti sto je u svojojanalizi previse ogranicen na analizu britan-skih i americkih kulturnih industrija, dok seostalih dijelova svijeta dotice manje. Takoderse mora napomenuti da on otvara mnogovise pitanja nego sto daje odgovora – jasnoje da je nemoguce pokriti sve aspekte jednogtako siroka podrucja u takvu udzbeniku.», «Alito ostavlja jednu zacudenost kod citatelja, pogotovo zato sto pocetak knjige pocinje posvetom: “Za Helen. Konglomeracija medija, bla, bla, bla…”. Stekne se dojam da autor nije posve spreman suociti se sa svim dimenzijama togabla, bla, bla…»

Хестанов Руслан Заурбекович, [Экономическая политика](https://publications.hse.ru/mirror/pubs/share/folder/hdvhqp3w51/direct/202587587.pdf) — «Поэтому книга не вписывается в модный тренд, прославляющий культурные индустрии как знамение новой эры свободного труда и радостного потребления», «Книга ценна своим скептическим взглядом и подробным разбором матчасти разных секторов культурной индустрии.», «Оригинальность исследования, предпринятого Хезмондалшем, заключа-ется в том, что он впервые попытался посмотреть на культурные индустрии в исторической перспективе и показал, как непросто ответить на вопрос: изменились ли культура на самом деле и если да, то в какой степени?»

[REVIEW_RETELLING] Kate Liley, Griffith University, [Journal of Sociology](https://sci-hub.se/10.1177/144078330504100208) — «Hesmondhalgh’s measured and cogent response to his subject has resulted in a book with much to offer academics and students alike from a wide range of disciplines, providing a useful overview of key debates and approaches to the cultural industries.»

[REVIEW_RETELLING] Christina Spurgeon, Queensland University of Technology, [Media International Australia incorporating Culture and Policy](https://sci-hub.se/10.1177/1329878X0310700119) — «Factors which will ensure the appeal of The Cultural Industries as a text in undergraduate cultural and creative industries courses. It will certainly not be misplaced on Australian required and recommended reading lists.», « In Chapter 4, Hesmondhalgh describes four 'waves' of 'marketisation' (p. 1(») of broadcasting and telecommunications that have swept the world since the early 1980s. This is the most concise and comprehensible international analysis of these developments that I have read to date. One very interesting feature of this book is its humanistic focus on symbol creators, managers and interrnediaries.», «Other noteworthy features of this book which make it a really excellent student reference are the brief discussions of key texts and further reading that conclude each chapter, and the comprehensive index.»

[REVIEW_RETELLING] Katya Johanson, Deakin University, Australia, [International Journal of Arts Management](https://sci-hub.se/10.2307/41064966) — « Sometimes these boxed extracts are a little too cursory for instance, "How policy works" barely touches on the factors that produce public policy. At other times they read like a running commentary on the text itself. Such weaknesses are offset by the authors personal reflection and humour. The Cultural Industries's an inclusive invitation to engage in a friendly, lively and topical argument»

[REVIEW_NO_ACCESS] 이연정, [문화경제연구](https://academic.microsoft.com/paper/2261070807/related)

[ADDITIONAL_READING] Georgina Born, David Hesmondhalgh — «Western Music and Its Others: Difference, Representation, and Appropriation in Music»

David Hesmondhalgh, Jason Toynbee (edited by) — «The Media and Social Theory»

David Hesmondhalgh, Sarah Baker — «Creative Labour: Media Work in Three Cultural Industries»

David Hesmondhalgh — «Why Music Matters»

David Hesmondhalgh, Kate Oakley, David Lee, Melissa Nisbett — «Culture, Economy and Politics: The Case of New Labour»

James Curran, David Hesmondhalgh — «Media And Society»

Kaspar Maase — «Populärkulturforschung»

Paul Woodford — «Music Education in an Age of Virtuality and Post-Truth»

Арутюнова Анна Георгиевна — «Арт-рынок в XXI веке»

Бен Багдикян — «Монополия средств информации»

Клиффорд Гирц — «Интерпретация культур»

Мануэль Кастельс — «Галактика Интернет»

Мануэль Кастельс — «Власть коммуникации»

Ролан Барт — Мифологии

[NO_SCEDRECO] -->
1. Хезмондалш Дэвид — Культурные индустрии (ВШЭ, 2018).pdf

<a id="Культурные-войны"></a>
# Культурные войны

<a id="Академические-левые"></a>
## Академические левые

<a id="Паранаучность-академических-левых"></a>
### Паранаучность академических левых

<!--- [ACADEMIC_DEGREE] Rene Denfeld не имеет учёной степени, Simon Jackman teaches Political Science, S. Robert Lichter — Director of the Center for Media and Public Affairs

[ACADEMIC_DEGREE_EDITORS] Lewis Martin, PhD Geography, University of California, Berkeley — https://cap.stanford.edu/profiles/viewCV?facultyId=56327&name=Martin_Lewis

[ACADEMIC_DEGREE] Gross — PhD, ScD, «His AB and PhD degrees (zoology, general physiology) are from the University of Pennsylvania» — https://www.scienceinmedicine.org/fellows/Gross.html ; Levitt — Norman Levitt received his Ph.D. from Princeton University in 1967 and taught mathematics, specializing in topology — https://www.skeptic.com/eskeptic/09-10-26 . [Гросс](https://www.scienceinmedicine.org/fellows/Gross.html), [Левитт](https://www.skeptic.com/eskeptic/09-10-26).

[POSITIVE_OR_NEUTRAL_REVIEW] Paul Forman, Smithsonian Institute — https://sci-hub.se/10.1126/science.276.5313.750

[REVIEW_RETELLING] James M. Humber, Ph.D., Georgia State University — https://sci-hub.se/10.1023/A:1022942701510 — «In my opinion this volume should be required reading for anyone evenremotely connected with academia or the media», «if the book has any weakness at all, it is that it draws no consensus among the authors concerning the most effective way of responding to the attacks upon science and reason that permeate contemporary society.»

[BOOK_OR_AUTHOR_OR_CONCEPT_CRITICISM][REVIEW_SMASHER] Paul J. Milled, M.D., and Robert M. Nelson, M.D., Medical College of Wisconsin — https://zero.sci-hub.se/1105/7af13b522996718ff37607fbe3bb4260/humber1999.pdf#page=5 — «Implicit throughout the collection with few exceptions is the notion that those who abandonCartesian reality are doing so for their own ends. They are thus charlatans,quacks, and showboaters, or at times, more generously, merely misguidedand pathetic. The authors criticize them from the allegedly neutral unbiasedobserver standpoint which is implicitly devoid of political motives.», «They thus create a quintessential postmodern community, that is, one thatcategorizes member and nonmember according to whether or not oneagrees with specific statements. We can refer to these statements as state-ments of affiliation», «Being abstracted from the lived-in ritual and narrative context of traditional communities they take on a severe rigidity used to define and exclude the other.», «The book invites the reader to abandon the community of traditionalscholars and join a postmodern community of ideologically pure Cartesian realists. The articles are thus necessarily more polemical than scholarly. Agood example of this is the reading by Wallace Sampson on the alternativemedicine movement. Sampson states "overwhelming evidence shows thatacupuncture has only placebo effects, and that homeopathy has no effects"(p. 195). It takes very little effort to verify that both of these statementsare false.», «In Radcliffe Richard's article on feminist epistemology, the issue ofwhether or not this concept has utility is never addressed.», «Sommers' article, located in the section on the social sciences, portraysCarol Gilligan as an incompetent politically motivated researcher. No men-tion is made of Gilligan's seminal criticisms of Kohlberg's work.», «Despite her own observations, Sommersproclaims Gilligan's work worthless. After reading this article, one thing isclear: you can't be a member of this club if you are sympathetic to Carol Gilligan's views.», «One notable exception is Roth's "Building Bridges to Afrocen-trism" which, to a nonhistorian, appears to be a balanced critique of Afro-centric Egyptology and invites participation in dialogue with Afrocentricscholars rather than creating a litmus test.», «Those looking fora serious critique of the postmodern and unorthodox thought within theirdisciplines will need to look elsewhere»;

Frederick Gregory, University of Florida, Gainesville — https://sci-hub.se/10.1086/383697 — «As is inevitable for collections having so many contributors, the submissions vary enormously in quality, from emotional diatribes by angry scholars with answers ready at hand to thoughtful and provocative analyses by thinkers still in search of answers», «Nor is Gross's contribution the only one that expresses condescension. Even less constructive are Daniel Kleppner's essay on physics and common sense and Mario Bunge' s impatient praise of intolerance toward charlatanism»

Stephen Brush, University of Maryland — https://sci-hub.se/10.1002/%28sici%291098-237x%28200001%2984%3A1%3C114%3A%3Aaid-sce8%3E3.0.co%3B2-i — «At the same time other STS scholars expressed amazement that natural scientists, whostill enjoy enormous prestige and material resources compared to social scientists andhumanists, could feel threatened by a handful of scholars who were not (they insisted) “antiscience” but just wanted to study how science works as a social activity.», «Now thatscience depends so heavily on public funding and approval, they must learn to deal withother criteria they have traditionally considered irrelevant, such as respect for moral valuesand religious beliefs, and the social effects and environmental impact of the applicationsof scientific discoveries. Otherwise they will lose the science wars, despite all the blundersand absurdities of their critic»
 -->
1. Gross Paul R., Levitt Norman, Lewis Martin W. (editors) — The Flight from Science and Reason (New York Academy of Sciences, 1997).pdf

<a id="NR-23"></a>
#### NR

<a id="Академический-вокизм"></a>
##### Академический вокизм

<!--- [POSITIVE_OR_NEUTRAL_REVIEW] John Douard, University of Texas Medical Branch — https://sci-hub.se/10.2307/4236109 — «Gross and Levitt's analyses are weakest, in my view, when they interpret the work that challenges this traditional account of the relationship between nature and convention as being hostile to, and ignorant of, science.», «The result, they argue, is an extreme form of relativism, aided and abetted by a lack of basic scientific literacy.», «They do not challenge the central claim Longino makes?that contextual social values, as well as epistemic values, shape scientific practices and the knowledge produced by those practices. Rather, they suggest that Longino's arguments in support of this claim rest on a politically loaded reading of studies of biological and behavioral differences between the sexes.», «They are least effective when their own superficial knowledge of social science and its methods results in highly selective, unnuanced analyses of work they believe to be anti-science just because that work alleges science is a political enterprise.», «That said. I recommend the book for its scholarship, its courage, and, despite the serious tone of this review, its wit.»;

[REVIEW_ONE_PAGE] Melinda Kanner, Professor in the Sociology department at University of Houston Downtown — https://sci-hub.se/10.2307/4613380 — «At the same time, however, their specific attack on the "academic left" is significantly flawed. Their oversimplified, often unrepresentative discussions of feminist scholars and historians and philosophers of science (such as the French philosopher Michel Foucault) lack understanding and balance.»

[REVIEW_LONG][REVIEW_HISTORICAL_EXCURSION] Fuller Steve, University of Durham — https://sci-hub.se/10.1177/095269519500800109 — «I therefore expected to come away with some clear sense of where out authors think’science’ ends and ’society’ begins. I was instructively disappointed. In fact, thereis probably a strong connection between their own failure on this score and whatthey find least palatable about the academic left critique of science.», «ince Gross and Levitt periodically try to tar academic leftists with the brushof ’relativism’ and ’idealism’, let me emphasize that nothing said here requires denying the obvious, namely, that we have managed to eliminate certain deadly diseases, that astronauts have flown in space, and that atomic bombs have caused untold damage.», «The final and most serious charge that Gross and Levitt level against theacademic left is that it has largely refused to air its own disagreements in public,especially whenever exotic epistemic powers are being claimed for a traditionallyunderprivileged group»

[REVIEW_ANOTHER] Pasley Livingston, McGill University — https://sci-hub.se/https://www.jstor.org/stable/2904732 — «t is also unclear where these authors stand with regard to methodological dualism and the problem of the unity of the natural and human sciences. Gross and Levitt are largely silent about the positive achievements and potential of the humanities and social sciences, which have yet to be entirely overrun by the muddleheaded views these authors decry», «It is also unclear where these authors stand with regard to methodological dualism and the problem of the unity of the natural and human sciences. Gross and Levitt are largely silent about the positive achievements and potential of the humanities and social sciences, which have yet to be entirely overrun by the muddleheaded views these authors decry». В рецензии больше внимания уделяется Сьюзен Хаак, нежели Гроссу и Левитту.

Michael Ruse, professor of philosophy and zoology at the University of Guelph in Ontario — https://sci-hub.se/10.1002/j.2326-1951.1994.tb03620.x — «I believe Gross and Levitt have done a fine job, covering an enormous amount ofliterature with a care that must have taken a huge investment oftime.», «And though Gross and Levitt occasionally depict their opponents inaccurately, neglect to discuss criticism of science from within science and offer no workable solution, Higher Superstition succeeds», «Gross and Levitt have deliberately slanted the picture both to make humanists look bad and to avoid awkward questions about why serious scientists are part of the attack. A repeated theme ofHigher Superstition is that the humanists can make their critique of science only because they are grotesquely ignorant about science. But whatever else one might say about Gould and Lewontin, one cannot say that.», «The problem is that Gross and Levitt have unnaturally grouped too many things in their attack on those who would criticize science. Everyone who suits their purpose is thrown into the barrel, and then, in some desperate attempt to impose order, the blanket term academic lift is slapped onto the ill-assorted gallimaufry.»

Wilfred Niels Arnold, Dept. of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Univ.of Kansas Medical Center — https://sci-hub.se/10.1162/leon.1999.32.1.67d — «Both volumes are recommended to any audience that takes education seriously and is prepared to worry alongwith the authors about the potential threats to objective science that they have exposed. The repetitive setting upof straw men becomes a might tediousat times and one wonders if some of the cases are extreme examples that have been dignified by the attention. But overall, Higher Superstition will remain abenchmark in this field and Flight fromScience and Reason will be a usefulsource for years to come.»

[CRIM_OFFENSIVE] «which lent their pages (as they have been doing for some time) to anxious apologists for the antiscientific, pseudo-sociological fads that are the subject of this book»,

«Most of the indignant huffing and puffing came from the circled wagons of what we called, with repeated»,

«which lent their pages (as they have been doing for some time) to anxious apologists for the antiscientific, pseudo-sociological fads that are the subject of this book»,

«We had hoped to include in this new edition, as an appendix, the full text of Sokal’s article, which cites verbatim and to exceedingly comic effect a goodly collection of postmodernist “authorities” on science and its philosophical import. Alas, their tender sensibilities intervened to frustrate the hope.»

[CATEGORY_AD] Стандартные Анти-SJW аргументы, примеры:

«There is evidence in the popular stereotypes, jokes, and catchphrases that encapsulate the common understanding of what the academic left, the “political correctness” crowd, is all about. The standard caricature of the full-blown PC personage limns an individual who is not only deeply mindful of the sensibilities of nonwhite peoples and non-Western cultures, committed to the necessity of introducing nonsexist neologisms into every nook and cranny of English diction, militantly devoted to the abolition of every last vestige of gender stereotype, and deeply sympathetic toward homosexuality as a form of Otherness.» — создание негативного образа;

«It is quite different from a question like “multicultural education,” which is without question a defining issue for all postmodern radicals.» — приплюсовывание зоозащитников к постмодернистам, «мультикультурному образованию»;

«but who nonetheless eat steak with relish and wear, for appropriate occasions, leather bomber jackets or deerskin moccasins. Even among committed ecoradicals, animal rights is at best a lukewarm issue: it is a tricky thing to champion hunter-gatherer cultures as paragons of ecological wisdom without allowing that hunting may be a justifiable activity.» — приписывание зоозащитникам каких-то качеств;

«The spirit of postmodern critical theory nourishes contemporary animal rights doctrine; it coexists, logical inconsistencies notwithstanding, with old-fashioned pantheism and unvarnished sentimentality. The key point is the perspectivism and relativism central to the postmodern stance.» — снова увязка с постмодерном;

«Theoretically, of course, an animal rights purist would be quite willing to ban animal subject research even in the face of evidence of its enormous usefulness in extending human life and relieving human suffering. Some people take that precise position. But others, out of all-too-human motives, hedge the issue by declaring, on their own authority of course, that animal research leads to useless science and wrongheaded medical practice. No doubt this forestalls an inevitable crisis of conscience.» — чучело; я не видел, чтобы кто-то в зоозащитной среде имел такую позицию.

[NO_SCEDRECO] -->
1. Gross Paul R., Levitt Norman Jay — Higher Superstition. The Academic Left and Its Quarrels with Science (Hopkins Press, 1998).pdf

<a id="Постмодернистские-теории-религии-социальной-справедливости"></a>
### Постмодернистские теории религии социальной справедливости

<a id="NR-24"></a>
#### NR

<a id="Недостоверная-информация-3"></a>
##### Недостоверная информация

<!--- [Ti/Mono]

[ACADEMIC_DEGREE] Lindsay, [University of Tennessee — Knoxville](https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_graddiss/723/) — «PhD in mathematics, 2010, dissertation theme — "[Combinatorial Unification of Binomial-Like Arrays](https://trace.tennessee.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1803&context=utk_graddiss)"»

[JOURNALISM_DEGREE] Pluckrose, [Areo](https://areomagazine.com/author/hpluckrose/) — «editor-in-chief of Areo»

Авторы не имеют учёной степени в социальных науках.

[NOTE_FULL_NAME] Pluckrose Helen, Lindsay James Stephen — Cynical Theories꞉ How Activist Scholarship Made Everything about Race, Gender, and Identity — and Why This Harms Everybody

[REVIEW_CHECK] 2021-8-10

[POSITIVE_OR_NEUTRAL_REVIEW][REVIEW_ANOTHER] Roland Rich, Rutgers University, [Population and Development Review](https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/padr.12393) — «Some will question the way postmodernist ideas have been represented or misrepresented, and others will lament the narrowness of the enquiry, but as a generalist, this reviewer found the arguments cogent.», «Needless to say, the authors did not begin their enquiry with an open mind but were in search of evidence for the hatchet job they were undertaking. For that reason, one's response to the book will flow from one's dispositions.», «Pluckrose and Lindsay have taken sides in this debate, but it is almost impossible not to do so. Their book is informative and well worth reading.»

[REVIEW_PERSONAL_COMMENTS] В рецензии говорится больше о критической теории, нежели о книге

Michael Walsh, [Academic Questions](https://www.nas.org/academic-questions/34/1/down-from-liberalism) — «The book tells it well. Like witnesses for the prosecution, Pluckrose and Lindsay methodically dismantle the pillars of postmodern Wokeism»

[CRIM_OFFENSIVE] «The man was touched, not by the magic fire that has inspired so many great artists but by a diabolical rage against truth, order, light, and beauty that characterizes Satan in Milton’s Paradise Lost, and has the same object of hostility: humanity.», «Their pseudo-scientific vehicle was Critical Theory–a battering ram against everything from the temples of ancient Athens to the Roman Catholic Church to the medieval universities of Aquinas to the laboratories of the Enlightenment, to the American constitution and institutions of republican government. It’s been a century-long campaign by devoted enemies of civilization, its swath of destruction planetary, and its dewy future one of nihilism and despair.», «Post-1960s academics were not fired by a love of learning but by what has come to be called “social justice,” a philosophy of resentment and revenge masquerading as scholarship in the service of equity.», «Like the common flu masquerading as the novel civilizational threat, Covid-19, Critical Theory is an ideal weapon against the West: succinct yet vague, elegant in its universality of application, deceptive in appearance, and deliberately malignant in its application. At root, it is a philosophy of resentful losers who have at least since the 1930s, and certainly since the 1960s, relied on the naiveté and good will of their victims to allow its poisonous tenets into their cultures and civilizations.», «Marxists prefer to view “marginalized” groups as victims of prejudice, when in fact such marginalization generally results from the consequences of their own behavior or ineptitude.», «Like an opportunistic virus, Critical Theory emerged from Marxism and then–as Tom Holland points out in Dominion -jumped the species barrier by aping some of the liberal tenets of Christianity in order to be made at least partly acceptable to the marks and suckers.»

[REVIEW_COLUMN] Arnold S. Kling, Ph.D. in economics from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, [EconLog](https://www.econlib.org/library/Columns/y2020/KlingPluckroseLindsay.html) — «PL fail to draw this distinction between academic originators, popularizers, and those who implement ideas. I think this leaves them open to the charge that they have misread the academics, regardless of how accurately they have portrayed Theory as it was articulated by those who have popularized and implemented it.», «Again, PL have undertaken a fraught exercise. (…) I suspect that no self-described postmodernist philosopher would sign on to PL’s principles and themes.», «Nonetheless, PL’s model fits closely the rhetoric and actions of those who have popularized and implemented postmodernism in the form of Social Justice activism.», «If the mission of the postmodernists is to fight oppression by exposing it, then the mission of Pluckrose and Lindsay is to fight postmodernism by exposing what it has become in recent years.», «I wish that I could arrange that for every reading list that incorporates a Kendi or a DiAngelo, Critical Theories would also be included.»

Stephen L. Anderson, retired philosophy teacher in London, Ontario, [Philosophy Now](https://philosophynow.org/issues/143/Cynical_Theories_by_James_Lindsay_and_Helen_Pluckrose) — «However, it’s here that the one major weakness of their thesis also appears. For Lindsay and Pluckrose seem to imply that secular rationalism, the scientific method, and the idea of human rights, leapt into existence ex nihilo in the Eighteenth Century, as a pure gift of the Enlightenment, without social conditions or progenitors. They don’t seem to have wondered why these values appeared where they did and when they did, rather than at other times and places in history.», «So while it is quite fair for Lindsay and Pluckrose to criticise postmodernism for arbitrarily exempting its own metanarrative from being critically deconstructed, the very same charge of ‘historical denial’ could be leveled against them in return. This is unfortunate.», «Overall, though, this is a book that should be read by anyone with a serious interest in the origins of today’s events in regard to the ideology of Social Justice. Every politician should have a copy. And it would do a lot of good in the Humanities courses of the (post)modern university if this book were required reading along with the various social justice texts they already make mandatory – not just to provide ideological balance, but because it contains a thorough and fair history of the whole movement, from a helicopter-view perspective.»

[CRIM_OFFENSIVE] «In their practical applications, these disciplines have fed into the various street-level movements we now know under the umbrella of ‘Social Justice’, some of which movements have recently set our cities on fire.», «In their place, the lived experiences of ‘victims’ and ‘oppressed social groups’ are elevated to the status of data, giving SJWs the right to shout down all the conventional methods»

[REVIEW_IN_SCIENCE_MEDIA] Gabriel Andrade, [Skeptic](https://sci-hub.se/10.0000%2Fgo.gale.com%2F10639330) — «This is a golden opportunity to reclaim the liberal values proposed by Pluckrose and Lindsay, and uphold claims to the extent that they are supported by evidence, very much in the tradition of Enlightenment humanism and scientific skepticism.», «And alas, cynical theories are unlikely to liberate you; truth shall set you free.»

Gerard Casey, University College Dublin, [Society](https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s12115-021-00596-6.pdf) — «The publication of Cynical Theories by Helen Pluckrose and James Lindsay in 2020 will come as a delight to some, not quite so much to others, but it will come as no surprise to those of us who have chuckled in recent years at their debunking of various forms of academic idiocy.», «Liberals Pluckrose and Lindsay may be, but their political inclinations are sinistrous rather than dexterous.», «It is a little disappointing to find them lazily retailing the canards about the catastrophe that unregulated (unregulated by whom, precisely?) capitalism would wreak», «but these are relatively minor blemishes in an otherwise informative and entertaining read», «Should you read Cynical Theories? Yes, for even if you are knowledgeable about its topic, it’s good to have such a systematic and comprehensive survey to hand, and if you’re new to it all, then it will open your eyes to the dangers of Social Justice Activism and perhaps help strengthen your resistance to intellectual infection», «For a book dealing with such a shape-shifting area of thought, Cynical Theories is quite clearly written, although some judicious editing might have removed some of the more obvious and egregious repetitions, and streamlined the narrative.»

[CRIM_OFFENSIVE] «Social Justice Activism is, in some ways, the 2020s Western reincarnation of the Chinese Cultural Revolution, where the semi-illiterate and ignorant have taken it upon themselves to intimidate their elders and their betters.», «The Social Justice movement has all the hallmarks of a cult. Its advocates are “True Believers,”in the Eric Hoffer mold, filled with a frozen-faced and joyless certainty of the sinful state of the world, and consumed by an evangelical fervor to rectify it. They are priggish, self-righteous, intolerant, full of passionate intensity, and they regard those who reject their oh-so-obvious certainties as not just wrong but as wicked. Their operational principles are unfalsifiable—everything confirms them, nothing can disconfirm them.», «Given that Theory is just the latest and most fashionable model of skepticism, it is not surprising to find it adopting a version of the usual skeptical strategy of employing epistemological guerrilla tactics, hitting and running, and never being there when the returning fire comes in.»

[BOOK_OR_AUTHOR_OR_CONCEPT_CRITICISM][REVIEW_ANOTHER] Geoff G. Cole, Centre for Brain Science, University of Essex, [Sociological Methods & Research](https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/00491241211009949) — «I will show how the authors made a fundamental error in their method; they failed to assess whether their ideas were indeed ludicrous/absurd.», «The issue of knowing when a proposition is genuinely absurd relates to the single largest methodological mistake the authors made.», «For example, it is indeed ludicrous to suggest that the science of astronomy should incorporate astrology (e.g., horoscopes), as one nonaccepted hoax paper suggested, because there is no evidence for this. However, virtually all the hoax ideas presented in the 20 papers the authors wrote are of the opinion kind rather than the true/false kind.», «The hoax authors have a very odd conception of absurd/preposterous/ ludicrous ideas and data. To reiterate, the presentation of ludicrous ideas was absolutely central to the grievance studies project.», «It’s their job. The very opposite is true for editors and reviewers who handle empirical work. They take it at face value that the academic is honest. They are not on the lookout for anything deceptive.», «I am however an empirical scientist. Having published over 100 experiments on cognition and the human visual system, and reviewed all those others, I do know how to evaluate experimental design. Their method was fundamentally flawed because the authors did not a priori check the absurdity of their ideas. This is only one of many methodological problems that afflict Lindsay et al.’s project. These arose because three nonempirical academics attempted empirical work without bringing an experimentalist on board. The damage has however been done. The huge media coverage ensured this», «Rather than finding advocates and generating support, most ideas just fade away, deemed inadequate. The grievance studies project will go the same way.»

[REVIEW_PERSONAL_COMMENTS] Статья критикует мистификацию Богоссяна/Линдси/Плакроуз

[REVIEW_SELF-PUBLISHING] Jenni Brichzin, [Professur für Allgemeine Soziologie und Soziologische Theorie](https://www.unibw.de/soziologie/professur-fuer-allgemeine-soziologie-1/brichzin/dr-jennifer-brichzin), [personal site](http://jenni.brichzin.de/english-how-not-to-criticize-postmodern-theories/) — «To be sure, both authors are neither card-carrying social scientists nor do they work in the humanities – Pluckrose is a writer, Lindsay is a mathematician», «Yet, I think it is crucial for social theory to engage with the arguments brought forth against this large body of literature, and “Cynical Theories” is a good point of departure. It certainly does a good job in wading through the vast bodies of literature on postmodernism in the broadest sense; it presents its points of critique in a concise, determined, and often typical manner; and it names a solution to all the problems specified», «The guiding question for my review is this: What happens if we evaluate the book according to the scientific standards emphasized throughout by the authors themselves?», «But the way this issue is treated here is not suited to solve the problem. One might even say: the book epitomizes what is wrong with public intellectual debates today.», «As I said, the book contributes to important and growing discussions regarding the societal role and impact of anti-essentialist social theories. In this sense, it is to be welcomed.», «Despite its pejorative overtones in the more polemic paragraphs, the book indeed has “some merits” (p. 20) for the academic and non-academic reader alike. It conveys an accessible image of the postmodern ‘Theoretical’ (with a capital ‘T’, for its reification) discourse, its definitions and structuring. This would make it valuable for, say, a textbook (critical) introduction to postmodernism.», «So, what’s the problem? For all its emphasis on scientific precision and rigour, the argumentative foundation of the book itself is anything but clear and seems to be quite shaky on closer inspection. First and foremost is the claim that postmodernism renders itself obsolete by its self-evident absurdity.», «Thus, whenever the tenets of any line of postmodern theorizing is succinctly stated, the reader will be disappointed by what follows: instead of the “rigorous” reasoning that she might expect and which the authors so often call for (p. 19), she will be put off by unsupported assertions and commonplaces such as “most people would find such a conclusion properly ridiculous” (p. 104), or “most people […] rightly see [queer theory] as quite mad” (p. 89).», «Only occasionally, Pluckrose and Lindsay admit that there is an empirical foundation to anti-essentialist thinking. But when it is, it is usually spoken of in belittling terms as “not wholly unreasonable” (p. 215), comprising only a “kernel of truth” (p. 251), or “true in a banal sense” (p. 252).», «This may be an effective way to strategically readjust the boundaries of what is to be accepted as scientific and what is not (Gieryn 1983). But it cannot be counted as “rigorous” argumentation.», «A second recurring theme is the inaccessibility of postmodern language, for example, Judith Butler’s “semi-incomprehensible prose” (p. 54). (…) We will see that rhetorical clarity, conversely, is no guarantee for scientific insight.», «But this argument would certainly have much more credibility if the entire book were not ridden with glaring (in the idiom chosen by authors, we might say: absurd) contradictions.», «The authors frequently criticize and even ridicule postmodern theories for focussing on language and systems of thought and knowledge instead of ‘real’ problems (p. 186). That they write an entire book about how a specific way of thinking may have real consequences and how it is therefore to be vehemently contested seems to entirely escape the authors.», «Paradoxically, when discussing postmodern theories, the authors are happy to insinuate underlying power interests instead of a thriving for knowledge. For example, they argue that calls for “research justice” (p. 62) are not grounded in empirical insights into the unequal acknowledgement of female researchers or those who belong to minorities. Instead, we learn that these groups delegitimize a form of “knowledge production rooted in evidence and reasoned argument [as] an unfairly privileged cultural construct” (ibid.) in order to uphold the “postmodernists” own ideological footing in society», «The book frequently questions the political motivation of the postmodern theories’ (…) How and in what way this line of argumentation is different from the authors’ pervading political concern that postmodernism “undermines public trust in the academy” (p. 99) and therefore poses a threat to liberal society remains unclear.», «The authors certainly see themselves as ardent advocates of science and scientific method in the classical – modern – sense. It might thus come as a surprise that, in order to debunk anti-essentialist thinking scientifically, they neither outline theoretically grounded hypotheses nor draw from (systematically gathered) sound empirical evidence, but mainly seem to call upon the common sense of “most people” (p.89) and to chastise not immediately comprehensible and “remarkedly complicated idea[s]” (p. 101).», «My main point is to call into question the authors’ investment in portraying the reality as ruled by order, unambiguity, distinctness: first of all, Pluckrose and Lindsay assign the care for postmodern theorizing to one political corner, and one political corner only (p. 45). What is more, they ignore that constructivist thought may not only be (at least partly) to blame for the surge in right-wing politics», «They even seem to have a very simplistic and perhaps distorted understanding of their own favourite system of thought, liberalism: whatever good happened after the Enlightenment – the liberation movements of the 1960s and 1970s, for example (which the emerging postmodern discourse allegedly had nothing to do; p. 38) – is due to liberalism. All the bad things on the other hand such as “Nazism, the Holocaust, and genocidal communism” (p. 247), not to mention world wars and the destruction of the environment, had nothing to do with liberalism. Thus, the pervading belief in unambiguity goes on: liberalism is “almost directly at odds” (p. 237) with postmodernism; only the liberal way is the right way to practice critique (as opposed to the “cynical”, “paranoid” and destructive way of postmodern criticizing; p. 175); liberalism inevitably “leads to progress” (p. 239).», «Considering that “Cynical Theories” is constantly calling for “correspondence to reality” (p. 84), it has surprisingly little insight into the intrinsic complexity and incoherence of the (social) world it claims to describe.», «To conclude: “Cynical Theories” is very well written, but on closer inspection often poorly argued. While I root for clear writing, I would always prefer a book that is difficult to read but harbours some intriguing insight over one that smoothly guides me through its own intellectual insignificance.», «The book offers no real starting points to solve the problems of theorizing society today. Rather, it seems (again, not unlike postmodernism as described by the authors) to bask in the self-content of its own absolute verdict. How this is to help estranged groups and polarized societies is beyond me.»

[REVIEW_IN_MEDIA][REVIEW_SMASHER][REVIEW_LONG] Samuel Hoadley-Brill, PhD student in philosophy at the CUNY Graduate Center, [LiberalCurrents](https://www.liberalcurrents.com/the-cynical-theorists-behind-cynical-theories/) — «Sadly, Pluckrose and Lindsay elect not to elaborate on the claim that resisting this movement has been “literally… fatal,” leaving readers incapable of paying formal respects to the brave heroes who sacrificed their lives in the noble war on Wokeness.», «Readers with a nuanced understanding of postmodern philosophy are sure to be discouraged by the sophomoric analysis of Foucault and his peers as committed to indiscriminate moral and epistemic relativism. Worst of all, however, is the frequent tendency of Pluckrose and Lindsay to characterize as postmodernist thinkers who cannot by any scholarly standard be put into that bucket. Chapter eight of Cynical Theories, “Social Justice Scholarship and Thought,” is an especially egregious example of this, and so will be our main focus.», «“Social Justice Scholarship and Thought” stands heads and shoulders above the rest of Cynical Theories for its sophistry and imprecision. In it, the authors set out to explain reified postmodernism—the current and most advanced form of Theory—and how it evolved from the applied postmodernism discussed in earlier chapters.», «Although reified postmodernism is not uniquely tied to any one discipline, eighteen of the twenty-one scholars cited in the authors’ exposition of reified postmodernism are academic philosophers. (…) Sadly, none of these philosophers are postmodernists, and none of them can be reasonably interpreted as believers in “The Truth according to Social Justice.”», «Elsewhere, Lindsay traces the origins of neo-Marxist critical theory to the Critique of Pure Reason, which he describes as “the anti-Enlightenment project of Immanuel Kant.” No references are given for this hilariously misguided historical claim», «As the chapter progresses, the authors’ misstatements of Dotson’s work go from sloppy to outright defamatory.», «The grain of truth in this slanderous sandcastle», « I really have no idea where Pluckrose and Lindsay got this from; “science” appears only in a quote Dotson references, and the article contains absolutely no mention of “reason” in the relevant sense of the term.», «Yet the misrepresentations get even worse. After their specious declaration that Dotson treats “folk wisdom” and “witchcraft” as “knowledge-producing methods”—claims which, of course, Dotson has never so much as suggested in her work», «The icing on the cake: there are no citations for any of these claims. Nor is there a shred of evidence in Dotson’s entire body of work to suggest she endorses cultural relativism», «Maybe this is because the expression “experiential knowledge” is, perhaps unsurprisingly, entirely absent from the academic articles in which Lindsay and Pluckrose ostensibly locate it.», «After a series of sweeping, unsubstantiated claims about contemporary Theorists being opposed to science», «We have already seen their groundless accusations against Dotson on this issue, but do they have any evidence of others making such racist and sexist claims?», «This is yet another opportunistic perversion of the scholarship they purport to be describing.», «Lindsay and Pluckrose provide no actual evidence that any of the scholars they call “reified postmodernists” see reason and evidence as parochial values exclusive to white people, the West, or men.», «Nothing Medina says about this concept suggests anything like such an interpretation. Had they read Fricker’s paper in which she coined the term, they might have learned what it really means: the right to make use of a private set of hermeneutical resources in order to stay safe from potential harm.», «Pluckrose and Lindsay are at their most naïve when they call Charles Mills a “Theorist”», «They could certainly learn a thing or two from reading his work and taking it seriously.», «When it comes to the Applebaum book and the Bailey article, however, we have two more cases of misrepresentation.», «At this point it should hardly come as a surprise that these accusations are unfounded, as is evident from taking a closer look at what Bailey actually says: that “we need to be clear about the differences between critical thinking, healthy skepticism, and privilege-preserving epistemic pushback.”», «Anyone who bothers to actually read “When the Joke Is on You” will notice the problems with this characterization: first, the paper does not advocate shutting down any critiques that actually contain knowledgeable engagement; second, neither of the hoaxes cited in the paper contain such engagement; third, both hoaxes cited in the paper were published in remarkably shoddy academic journals, as Sokal’s was not even peer reviewed and Lindsay and Boghossian’s was published in a predatory pay-to-publish journal.», «But Pluckrose and Lindsay appear to think that fully understanding these works requires approaching them in the most cynical way possible, cherry-picking quotes and distorting their distinctions to support the implausible overarching argument of Cynical Theories.», «Having examined the views of the scholars identified as the pioneers of Social Justice scholarship (and not merely the straw men and women Pluckrose and Lindsay make them out to be), it is worth reflecting on the aptness of the label “postmodernist” for their views. A close examination reveals that Pluckrose and Lindsay are not merely cherry-picking thinkers or quotes to make their points; they are cherry-picking in an apple orchard.», «For those of us who have carefully read the literature, Pluckrose and Lindsay’s discussion of reified postmodernism in academic philosophy looks much more like incendiary fan fiction than scholarly analysis. What explains this misrepresentation?», «But I say this quite confidently: Cynical Theories suffers from the exact same problems Pluckrose and Lindsay diagnose in Social Justice scholarship—namely, misplaced cynicism combined with unwarranted confidence in such cynical interpretations. Critical scrutiny exposes an embarrassing fact: Pluckrose and Lindsay have done a better job of revealing themselves as cynical theorists than revealing any of the theories they discuss as cynical.», «A full takedown of all its bullshit—in the serious, philosophical sense of ‘bullshit’ discussed by Harry Frankfurt—would indeed be exceptionally tedious, so I have, for the time being, restricted my most in-depth analysis to chapter eight, where I already have plenty of experience studying the relevant academic literature.», «But a full takedown of Cynical Theories is a worthwhile project, and it’s one I plan to take up soon.»
-->
1. Pluckrose Helen, Lindsay James Stephen — Cynical Theories (Pitchstone Publishing, 2020).pdf

<a id="Аргументация-прогрессивных-левых"></a>
## Аргументация прогрессивных левых

1. [Burgis Ben](https://gpc.academia.edu/BenBurgis) — Give Them an Argument. Logic for the Left (Zero Books, 2019).pdf

<a id="Дебаты-на-темы-культурных-войн"></a>
## Дебаты на темы культурных войн

<!--- [N/QP]

[JOURNALISM_DEGREE] [High Profiles, interview](https://highprofiles.info/interview/james-obrien/) — «In his twenties, he pursued a career as a journalist at the Daily Express, eventually becoming editor of the William Hickey gossip column. He also had work published in Cosmopolitan and the Spectator.», «From 2000 to 2002, he was a panellist on Channel 5’s The Wright Stuff. In 2001, he presented a talk show on Anglia Television titled A Knight with O’Brien and, with his wife, Lucy McDonald, fronted Channel 5’s general election show 5 Talk.», «He first hosted a show on the talk radio station LBC (‘Leading Britain’s Conversation’) in 2002 as holiday cover. He landed his own weekly programme the following year and became a full-time presenter in 2004.», «From 2014 to 2018 he did occasional stints as a guest presenter on Newsnight on BBC2, and in 2015 he fronted an eponymous lunchtime topical-debate show on ITV which ran for 10 episodes.», «In 2017, he was named ‘radio broadcaster of the year’ at the British Press Guild Awards.»

[NO_SCEDRECO][NO_SOURCES]

[REVIEW_CHECK] 2021-9-7

[NO_REVIEW]

[NO_PDF] -->
1. O’Brien James — How To Be Right꞉ … in a world gone wrong (Ebury Publishing, WH Allen, 2018).epub

<a id="Культурные-войны-в-высших-учебных-заведениях"></a>
## Культурные войны в высших учебных заведениях

<a id="Сейфтизм"></a>
### Сейфтизм

<!--- [Is/Mono]

[ACADEMIC_DEGREE] Haidt, [New York University Stern School of Business, CV](people.stern.nyu.edu/jhaidt/haidt.cv.doc) — «University of Pennsylvania, Ph.D. in Psychology, 1992. Dissertation title: "Moral judgment, affect, and culture, or, is it wrong to eat your dog?"»

[NO_ACADEMIC_OR_PROFESSIONAL_DEGREE] Lukianoff, [Libertarianism.org](https://www.libertarianism.org/people/greg-lukianoff) — «President of the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education»

[CRIM_SPEAKER] Lukianoff, [FIRE](https://www.thefire.org/resources/fire-staff-speakers/greg-lukianoff/)

[CRIM_SPEAKER] Haidt, [TED](https://www.ted.com/speakers/jonathan_haidt)

[NO_SCEDRECO][CRIM_CO-AUTHOR]

[REVIEW_CHECK] 2021-8-9

[POSITIVE_OR_NEUTRAL_REVIEW] Niclas Lindström, Umeå universitet, [Högre utbildning](https://umu.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1357600/FULLTEXT01.pdf) — «I det här fallet behöver läsaren endast konsultera en av Lukianoffs och Haidts återkommande källor, Chronicle of Higher Education, för att hitta referenser till undersökningar som visar hur vit maktpropagandan ökat med 77 % vid amerikanska campus bara under 2017 (se t ex Zahneis, 2018). Dessa resultat gör det svårt att följa författarnas argumentation om att endast vänsteranhängare ska betraktas vara skyldiga till den politiska polarisering som skett vid universiteten.», «Varför väljer då författarna en sådan argumentationslinje? (…) Ett sätt att förstå detta är att författaren medvetet valt att bli mer konservativ i sitt tankesätt. Kanske kan även Lukianoffs och Haidts bok ses i ljuset av detta.», «Trots de brister som lyfts fram i denna recension blir slutsatsen ändå att Lukianoff och Haidt gjort ett ambitiöst försök att blottlägga orsakerna till varför studenter reagerar oftare och kraftfullare på innehållet i undervisningen än tidigare samt att formulera råd om hur lärare kan agera för att komma till rätta med problemen för att på så sätt främja ett öppet och kritiskt debattklimat vid högskolor och universitet.», «Om inte annat är boken ett intressant och välskrivet diskussionsunderlag för dem som intresserar sig för frågor som berör t ex yttrandefrihet och lika villkor vid högskolor och universitet.»

[REVIEW_PERSONAL_COMMENTS] «Trots de brister som lyfts fram» — в рецензии Лидстрём критиковал книгу ровно однажды

[REVIEW_RETELLING] Léandre Bouffard, Université de Sherbrooke, [Revue québécoise de psychologie](https://www.erudit.org/en/journals/rqpsy/2019-v40-n2-rqpsy04976/1065916ar/) — «The coddling of the american mind nous intéresse de ce côté-ci de la frontière, parce que les changements (ou les bouleversements) qui surviennent chez nos voisins du Sud nous atteignent invariablement. Il intéressera aussi les parents d’adolescents et les éducateurs de tous les niveaux. Voudront le lire également – et avec profit – les étudiants universitaires. Les enseignants des collèges québécois y trouveront une grande source de réflexion puisque leurs étudiants sont du même âge que ceux qui entrent à l’université aux États-Unis.»

Laura M. Harrison, Ohio University, [Journal of College & Character](https://sci-hub.se/10.1080/2194587X.2019.1631190) — «Lukianoff’s role as president and CEO of the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education (FIRE) did not endear me to him given that organization’s reputation for thwarting diversity efforts.», «What I found instead was a well-crafted corrective to the excesses of the call-out culture stifling academic communities.», «While I found many positive elements of the book, the authors’ limited understanding of what it is like to face constant discrimination comes across as a glaring blind spot at times.», «The authors create a false binary, categorizing offensive speech as either meeting the legal definition of harassment and therefore bad or merely distasteful and therefore unproblematic.», «Lukianoff and Haidt do a service to readers in both naming the issues to consider and providing concrete strategies for re-igniting what higher education can be: a place where people get smarter and more empathic by interacting with a bigger world than they could access on their own.»

Russ Nieli, Senior Preceptor in Princeton University’s James Madison Program, [Academic Questions](https://sci-hub.se/10.1007/s12129-018-9765-6) — «The duo’s first challenge was to document these changes through appropriate quantitative and empirical studies. In many cases this wasn’t difficult as relevant databases existed. Their second more difficult challenge was to make sense of it all and explain reasons for this sudden generational change.», «To a certain degree the answers are speculative, but the authors assemble a fair amount of supporting material to back up most of their claims.», «To this reviewer the major claims of The Coddling of the American M i n d are unassailable and its reasoning for the most part clear and convincing.», «My major criticism of the book concerns not what is said, but what the book leaves out.», «Selection in the complex topics the book addresses is obviously inevitable, and in private communication Haidt tells me that he and Lukianoff had wanted to include material on at least one other factor—the harmful spillover effects of anti-bullying campaigns in American high schools. (…) Haidt says this factor was not included because of the difficulty he and Lukianoff had in finding supporting empirical data for such a highly credible though difficult to measure claim.», «More problematic is the fact that there is nothing in the book about the effects of affirmative action “mismatching”on student satisfaction with their college experience; nothing about the harmful spillover effects of sexual harassment codes that give students a right to be protected by college administrators from such things as “sexual or gender-based jokes or teasing,” “giving sexually suggestive looks, ” and “giving someone a ‘once over’”», «Such objections aside, Lukianoff and Haidt have done a fine job in producing what one reviewer calls “equal parts mental health manual, parenting guide, sociological study, and political manifesto.”It deserves a wide readership.»

[REVIEW_PREPRINT] Ho Manh Tung, Ritsumeikan Asia Pacific University, Beppu, Oita, Japan, [preprint](https://osf.io/h4g2e/download) — «I agree with the authors up to the point of the emergence of the “cancel culture.”», «But Haidt and Lukianoff’s account doesn’t explain the violence that comes so readily with the new over-sensitive campus culture.», «It seems to me, in the book, there should be more of the culture of drugs in America.», «In addition, I also think that all of those socio-cultural forces interact with each other: the change in philosophy of the schooling and parenting, the arrival of social media, the prevalence of drugs use to treat mental health problems, etc. As such, it is important to understand how sociocultural values and their interactions underlie our collective worst moments»

[REVIEW_RETELLING] Richard Balon, Wayne State University, Detroit, [Academic Psychiatry](https://sci-hub.se/10.1007/S40596-019-01125-8) — «This book, in my opinion, is an important book with a lot of thought for educators. One may not agree with everything, but it makes the reader think and ask, “Are we preparing our trainees for the road?”», «Reflecting on this book may, in my opinion, help. And last, but not least, this book also reminds us that we, as educators, should make students think»

[REVIEW_HIGH_POSITIVE] Robert Maranto, [Journal of School Choice](https://sci-hub.se/10.1080/15582159.2019.1615271) — «This is the one book all academics, indeed all literate Americans, should read. No single work better explains rising anger, polarization, and censorship in academia and society than The Codding of the American Mind.», «Perhaps the rush to politically correct safetyism on the right and (mainly) the left has reached its apogee. If so, no work will have better diagnosed the problems and provided solutions than The Coddling of the American Mind.»

[REVIEW_IN_SCIENCE_MEDIA] Anondah Saide & Kevin McCaffree, University of North Texas, [Skeptic](https://www.skeptic.com/reading_room/great-untruths-coddling-american-mind-review/) — «Lukianoff and Haidt’s book provides an important foundation for understanding the current climate on college campuses and in American culture more generally; yet we believe there are several missing considerations and emphases that may clarify and strengthen their argument.», «First, scholars and students might be totally unaware of the modern arguments for cultural/human progress put forth in books such as The Better Angels of our Nature,5 Enlightenment Now,6 The Moral Arc,7 Factfulness,8 and others. (…) As a result, they have a genuine belief that they live in a world that has never been more bigoted and cruel, and that everything is getting worse.», «Second, Lukianoff and Haidt contend that social media use and parental over-protection have made children fragile, but another interpretation is that it made some of them entitled, over-confident and skilled in using “fears of safety” as a rhetorical device to demand capitulation to their feelings. (…) Lukianoff and Haidt seem too willing to take students at their word regarding their fragility, indeed, taking students at their word assumes a very high degree of self-awareness on the part of students. Moreover, on its face, violent retaliation, mob-like demands to destroy the career and reputation of others, and a morally righteous “call-out” culture certainly does not seem to be driven by fragility.», «Third and related to the points made above, it is also possible, and inadequately explored by Lukianoff and Haidt, that self-reported rates of depression and anxiety have, themselves, been influenced by concept creep.», «The students most expressing the apparent fragility Lukianoff and Haidt discuss are university students at elite universities coming from comfortable high-income families.», «Genuine increases in anxiety and depression among iGen would be a very serious social problem, but before concluding that the rise is in fact an epidemic, Lukianoff and Haidt should more seriously consider the possible role of concept creep. If the notion of violence is commonly trivialized to include verbal comments and people one does not like, might also the notions of anxiety and depression be increasingly trivialized to include minor annoyances or discomforts in one’s life which do not, in fact, manifest so severely as to impact one’s ability to function?», «Fourth, Lukianoff and Haidt do not adequately address the possibility that these emerging cultural trends might be driven by cognitive mechanisms very similar to the ones underlying religious ideation. (…) Christianity is viewed as an increasingly untenable ideology among young people and progressive activists, as a result, might they be seeking out a secular political substitute?», «Lastly, a gap in the text regards an obvious, but unexplored explanation for why students and others feel the need to virtue-signal and moralize so incessantly. (…) It is possible that, consistent with the incredible level of ignorance regarding cultural progress suggested above, people genuinely do not understand why other humans act morally and ethically.», «Lukianoff and Haidt have offered a relevant contribution to the emerging discussion surrounding recent attacks on academic freedom and viewpoint diversity both onand off-campus. For anyone interested in these issues, their book is a vital read.», «In having written this book and defended it publicly, Lukianoff and Haidt have put their careers and reputations on the line. Writing this book took courage in a climate where the worst of intentions are presumed and where defenses of intellectual freedom are cast as alt-right extremism.»

Gorman Beauchamp, University of Michigan, [Humanitas](https://css.cua.edu/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/Gorman-Beauchamp-The-Danger-of-Too-Much-Safety.pdf) — «The authors of Coddling never mention the postmodernism that prevails in most social science and humanities departments», «Lest my account makes it seem that Lukainoff and Haidt provide an entirely pessimistic analysis of this complex of problems, I should add that they don’t.», «Let me revert then to my high school days when every oral book review in my English class seemed to end with the same peroration: this is a good book and you should read it. So in that spirit: this is a good book and you should read it.»

[BOOK_OR_AUTHOR_OR_CONCEPT_CRITICISM][REVIEW_LONG] Guillaume Loignon, Candidat au doctorat, Université de Montréal and Sébastien Béland, Professeur, Université de Montréal, [Revue des sciences de l’éducation](https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Guillaume-Loignon/publication/351360132_Entre_conservatisme_et_rectitude_politique_en_enseignement_superieur_un_commentaire_critique_sur_The_coddling_of_the_American_mind/links/6093ee79458515d315fcdb1b/Entre-conservatisme-et-rectitude-politique-en-enseignement-superieur-un-commentaire-critique-sur-The-coddling-of-the-American-mind.pdf) — «Du côté de la recherche en éducation, l’impact semble plus modeste : une requête sur le moteur ERIC retourne trois recensions du livre dans des revues avec comité de lecture (Bauerlein, 2019 ; Doughty, 2018 ; Harrison, 2019) et 24 publications mentionnant The coddling of the American mind, qu’il s’agisse de l’article ou du livre.», «Les auteurs pointent finalement en direction des réseaux sociaux : « les médias sociaux sont une partie majeure du problème, étant impliqués à la fois dans l’augmentation des taux de problèmes de santé mentale et dans la polarisation politique » (p. 265, traduction libre).», «Malgré son intérêt et sa pertinence, The coddling of the American mind est loin d’être un livre parfait, et nous avons perçu dans l’ouvrage des lacunes qui en limitent la portée théorique et les possibilités de généralisation.», «Un point faible dans The coddling, peut-être en raison d’un positionnement incertain entre le livre grand public et l’ouvrage scolaire, réside dans l’usage de la documentation pour constituer un cadre théorique susceptible d’appuyer les idées et analyses présentées.», «On remarque dès les premiers chapitres que les sources documentaires appuyant les propos du livre sont peu diversifiées et employées parfois avec un manque de sens critique.», «D’une manière similaire, le concept d’antifragilité, tiré du livre grand public Antifragile, de Nassim Taleb (2012), apparait une quinzaine de fois, et est employé d’une manière qui pourrait laisser croire que Taleb est une autorité en matière d’agents stresseurs alors que son expertise reconnue se situe plutôt dans les domaines de la finance et des statistiques.», «Certains vides théoriques entrainent des contradictions apparentes qui, si elles ont su alimenter nos réflexions, ne sont pas élucidées par les auteurs. Prenons par exemple le concept de prise de risque (risk taking). L’une des principales thèses de The coddling est que l’obsession sécuritaire des parents, des médias et du personnel administratif des universités a induit chez les jeunes de la génération actuelle un ensemble de biais cognitifs les rendant peu résilientes et très aversifves au risque (chapitres 8, 9 et 10). Pourtant, les mêmes jeunes sont décrites dans le livre comme étant contestataires, prêtes à monter des actions politiques souvent sophistiquées et radicales, parfois même violentes, quitte à mettre leurs études en péril – n’est-ce pas là une forme de prise de risque?», «Un autre vide théorique se fait sentir quand les auteurs rapportent au chapitre 10 ce qu’on pourrait décrire comme une massification de l’éducation», «L’explication proposée par les auteurs est que la massification de l’éducation a entrainé sa transformation en un produit de consommation (consumerization) et que, selon le principe du client qui a toujours raison, le personnel administratif cherche à éviter tout désagrément à sa clientèle. Cela n’explique pas, cependant, pourquoi les opinions et comportements d’autrui sont perçus comme des désagréments en premier lieu.», «Nous voyons davantage un problème dans la caractérisation que font les auteurs des orientations politiques, qui nous semble calquée sur le système états-unien à deux partis. Dans le paysage politique dépeint par Lukianoff et Haidt, la population semble répartie sur une échelle unidimensionnelle», «Pour ces raisons, il est plutôt réducteur d’utiliser le terme « liberal » (tel que compris en contexte états-unien) comme un équivalent de la gauche politique, et « conservative » comme un synonyme parfait de la droite politique.», «Les auteurs suggèrent par ailleurs, de manière peu convaincante, que les libéraux⋅les auraient davantage tendance à vouloir censurer les opinions qui les choquent (chapitre 2). Dans l’ensemble, leur représentation du paysage politique est bidimensionnelle et stéréotypée.», «L’idée que des individus « libéraux » sur le plan des libertés individuelles puissent être en même temps, par exemple, conservateurs sur des questions économiques comme la fiscalité semble avoir été exclue de la grille d’analyse du livre», «nous croyons que le propos aurait été mieux servi par une grille d’analyse politique plus fine.», «En somme, on peut faire la synthèse de nos critiques en affirmant que The coddling of the American mind est un ouvrage assez « made in U.S.A. » et influencé par le non-cognitivisme moral du second auteur, Jonathan Haidt. Bien que le sujet soit d’un grand intérêt et que les auteurs amènent des intuitions qui suscitent la réflexion, l’argumentaire déployé laisse parfois paraitre des faiblesses dans l’analyse conceptuelle préalable. Cette faille s’observe autant dans la caractérisation des idéologies politiques que dans l’analyse des concepts clés du livre, laquelle s’appuie souvent sur un petit nombre de sources documentaires qui auraient pu être maniées avec plus de perspective critique.», «En dépit de ses limites, l’ouvrage The coddling of the American mind demeure intéressant à utiliser en salle de classe.»

[REVIEW_LONG] Carrie-Ann Biondi, Higher Ground Education, [Reason Papers](https://www.academia.edu/44344258/Book_Review_of_The_Coddling_of_the_American_Mind) — «Despite this book’s many virtues, I have a few concerns. First, while I am sympathetic with much of the research that Lukianoff and Haidt draw on from Twenge (and others) to explain social media’s role in the teen mental health crisis, some of it falls short.», «This fails to explain, though, why it is that viewing others on social media causes such feelings. Those with healthy self-esteem and a strong sense of self would not care what anyone else looks like, so perhaps it is previous low self-esteem that causes increases in anxiety and depression—and that is what needs a deeper explanation.», «Also, this research (at least as presented here) does not take into account how many boys make negative comparisons between themselves and other males, such as is explored in The Adonis Complex.11 Whether it is girls or boys who are experiencing increasing rates of anxiety or depression, the underlying culprit may be something very different from what these researchers point to.», «My second concern is that Lukianoff and Haidt might overestimate how much influence teachers have over children and underestimate the power of parental example», «However, there is far more power in something they mention in passing than the space they devote to it suggests, namely, modeling and encouraging “productive disagreement.”», «Third, and perhaps most importantly, I think that Lukianoff and Haidt overlook a likely contributing cause to iGen’s troubles: mass public education.», «However, lurking behind several of the causes that they point to— such as increasing test anxiety, decreasing free play, invidious social comparison, etc.—is the fact that these detrimental trends are entrenched in the public school system», «Lukianoff and Haidt have provided some hard-earned gems of wisdom that all individuals can benefit from, but—in keeping with their deeper analysis—those insights are really gained by each of us while facing challenges in the rough-and-tumble of life.»

Tim Hulsey, associate provost of the Honors and Scholars program and a past president of Phi Kappa Phi, [Phi Kappa Phi](https://www.phikappaphiforum-digital.org/phikappaphiforum/spring_2019/MobilePagedArticle.action?articleId=1473470#articleId1473470) — «This is not the book I expected. Perhaps I should have paid more attention to the subtitle, because this gets closer to what this book is actually about. Nowhere in the book are students portrayed as coddled.», «In response, they offer a simplified version of cognitive behavioral therapy as the necessary corrective.», «Unfortunately, the version of CBT they present is oversimplified and often at odds with how CBT is used in practice.», «Nor do the authors consider the possibility that students’ concerns are actually the rethinking of culture by a generation that would like to live in a less sexist and racist world. More problematically, while they pay lip service to the struggles of marginalized groups, they fail to consider carefully the ongoing challenges they face.», «There is no doubt that the authors offer some worthwhile ideas. Feelings of fragility and victimhood can, of course, become problematic when taken to extremes; education proceeds by challenging ideas, not reflexively supporting them, after all.», «However, the authors make no mention of the suppression of speech at conservative universities. Nor do they consider the possibility that seemingly intractable social problems like racism and sexism cannot be overcome only through rational debate.»

[REVIEW_LONG][REVIEW_NO_ACADEMIC_SOURCES][REVIEW_SMASHER] Howard A. Doughty, Faculty of Communication, Art and Design at Seneca College in Toronto, [The Innovation Journal](https://www.innovation.cc/book-reviews/2018_23_3_3_doughty_bk-rev_lukianoff-haidt.pdf) — «Lukianoff and Haidt echo the mantras of “conservative” critics of higher education such as the notorious Dinesh D’Sousa», «Lukianoff and Haidt join in the familiar lament that the higher values of the American academy are weakened by a generation that seeks “safe spaces” and protection against the harm purportedly done by words and gestures as well as by deeds», «As evidence, Lukianoff and Haidt rely upon sporadic reports of ugly episodes that have occurred over the past few years in a small number of widely publicized events at seemingly placid places», «Without undertaking the kind of massive empirical study that would require a huge research budget and untold hours of computer time to crank out statistical analyses unfathomable to all but the elect and colourful but misleading pie-charts for everyone else, Lukianoff and Haidt make a sincere effort to untangle the story of the enormous growth of mental torments and clinical disorders on campus, and to make what connections they can to the overall political culture of the United States.», «As self-described liberals, Lukianoff and Haidt have taken upon themselves the dual obligations of diagnosticians and therapists.», «The Coddling of the American Mind is not, after all, a moralistic tract, but the potential basis of a practical Machiavellian guide to winning power. It can be read not only as a commentary on the character and quality of the current cohort of young people, but as a deft prologue for a complete “how-to” manual for manipulating public opinion and achieving electoral success.», «It is accepting, if not actively promoting, mental habits that will render the current and future generations incapable of understanding, never mind responding well to, whatever problems the future holds. If those problems— environmental degradation, overpopulation, mass migration, chronic democratic deficits and so on—are as acute as many people think they may be, then we will need intelligent, quick-witted, critical thinkers as citizens, not people whose reaction to adversity is either a pre-emptive cringe or a resort to uncontrolled anger.», «Framing the threat posed by the “coddling” of US undergraduates more as a psychological problem in child-rearing than a philosophical, pedagogical, socio-cultural or political problem, they look to cognitive behavioural therapy for an answer.», «Lukianoff and Haidt leave little room for historical, political, economic or any other kind of analysis that would permit us to take seriously the social complaints and the political concerns of the young. They ignore entirely the corporatization of higher education, the drastic reductio n in public funding, the commodification of curriculum, the commercialization of research, the adoption of the discount department store model of educational service delivery and the dominance of vocationalism in orientation and the primacy of programs that emphasize training over education in the effort to disseminate “employability skills” in the interest of creating “jobready products” (formerly known as students).», «The reason why this is the case and the proper approach to re-establishing faith in classical democracy (or something even better) may have less to do with psychology than Lukianoff and Haidt would have us believe.»

[CRIM_OFFENSIVE] «Lukianoff and Haidt echo the mantras of “conservative” critics of higher education such as the notorious Dinesh D’Sousa», «Lukianoff and Haidt join in the familiar lament that the higher values of the American academy are weakened by a generation that seeks “safe spaces” and protection against the harm purportedly done by words and gestures as well as by deeds»

[REVIEW_NO_ACCESS] Trevor Jackson, Salalah College of Technology, [SSRN](https://ssrn.com/abstract=3423848)

[REVIEW_NO_ACCESS] Maja Graso and Lynn Bowes-Sperry, [Academy of Management Learning & Education](https://journals.aom.org/doi/10.5465/amle.2020.0048)

[AUTHORS_PROJECTS] Lukianoff꞉ [FIRE](https://www.thefire.org/about-us/mission/) — «The Foundation for Individual Rights in Education’s mission is to defend and sustain the individual rights of students and faculty members at America’s colleges and universities. These rights include freedom of speech, freedom of association, due process, legal equality, religious liberty, and sanctity of conscience—the essential qualities of liberty.»

Haidt:

[OpenMind](https://openmindplatform.org/) — «A psychology-based educational platform designed to depolarize campuses, companies, and communities»

[Heterodox Academy](https://heterodoxacademy.org/) — «A collaboration among 5000 professors promoting open inquiry, viewpoint diversity, and constructive disagreement within universities»

[MoralFoundations](https://moralfoundations.org/) — «A collaboration among social psychologists who study the foundations of morality, in hopes of reducing conflict and polarization»

[NOTE_FULL_NAME] The Coddling of the American Mind꞉ How Good Intentions and Bad Ideas Are Setting up a Generation for Failure (Penguin Press, 2018)
-->
1. Lukianoff Greg, Haidt Jonathan — The Coddling of the American Mind (Penguin Press, 2018).pdf

<a id="Снежинки"></a>
### Снежинки

<!--- [N/WS]

[ACADEMIC_DEGREE] [New York University, Arts & Science](https://as.nyu.edu/content/nyu-as/as/faculty/ulrich-c-baer.html) — «Ph.D. 1995 (Comparative Literature), Yale»

[NO_SCEDRECO][CRIM_BIBLIOGRAPHY_END]

[REVIEW_CHECK] 2021-8-13

[REVIEW_IN_MEDIA][REVIEW_RETELLING] Sindre Bangstad, [Agenda Magasin](https://agendamagasin.no/debatt/det-snoflakene-har-rett-i/) — «Styrken ved Baers tilnærming er hans bakgrunn som universitetsadministrator, samt hans opptatthet av å basere debatter om ytringsfrihet på campus på empiriske erfaringer fra feltet.», «Teksten må leses som et uttrykk for en mer nyansert holdning til ytringsfriheten og dens grenser blant akademikere i USA.»

[BOOK_OR_AUTHOR_OR_CONCEPT_CRITICISM][REVIEW_IN_MEDIA] Keith E. Whittington, William Nelson Cromwell Professor of Politics at Princeton University, [Claremont Review of Books](https://claremontreviewofbooks.com/speaking-power-to-truth/) — «As a result of taking this position, Baer finds himself juggling two quite different kinds of claims. On the one hand, he embraces Post’s view that universities should be dedicated to advancing the truth and should reject falsehoods.», «On the other hand, Baer embraces an explicitly political vision that is at odds with Post’s ethos of expertise. Those who question the principle of equality advance an ideology that is dangerous, just as the advocacy of Nazism is dangerous.», «At bottom, Baer rejects that claim. He thinks professors should not be allowed to discomfort the demos, at least not on the commitments he particularly values. But once we make that concession, it is no longer obvious what universities are doing, or what purpose academic freedom serves. Baer’s creedal university will eventually swallow his technocratic university as a widening set of controversial social and political issues are shielded from acceptable critical inquiry.», «What Snowflakes Get Right elides differences between the various kinds of speech that take place on a modern college campus. If the question is whether neo-Nazi activist Richard Spencer should give an academic talk sponsored by the political science department, then the answer is an easy one.», «We could dramatically reduce academic free speech controversies if we restricted the speaking activities on campuses to professors reading their scholarly papers to entranced audiences.», «Baer ultimately makes clear that he would sacrifice both for the sake of his vision of equality: “In today’s age, we also have a simple solution that should appease all those concerned that students are insufficiently exposed to controversial views. It is called the internet.” Unfortunately, Baer’s allies, using his arguments, think that controversial views should also be driven off the internet.», «Though Baer is less forthright about how deeply his exclusionary approach should cut into the heart of academic freedom and be applied to scholarly research and teaching, many “snowflakes” would certainly be all too eager to expunge professors if they fail to pass the constantly evolving political litmus test of the creedal university.», «Baer is cavalier about what an earlier generation of liberals took as a hard-won victory in expanding the space for dissent in America. He breezily notes that things could be different but gives us little indication of how we got here or why.», «Like many campus censors, Baer imagines that altering the rules surrounding free speech will inhibit only those who disagree with him, never his allies.», «He ignores the costs associated with the kind of campus revolution he outlines, and he provides frustratingly few details about how his reimagined university would look and operate. He ignores the costs associated with the kind of campus revolution he outlines, and he provides frustratingly few details about how his reimagined university would look and operate.»

[CRIM_OFFENSIVE] «Heterodox gadflies tend to get swatted.», «But now, of course, the college graduates hired by the Times are scrubbing its op-ed pages of heresies as well.»

[REVIEW_NO_ACCESS] Mark Alfino, [Journal of Information Ethics](https://www.proquest.com/docview/2486868554?pq-origsite=gscholar&fromopenview=true)

-->
1. Baer Ulrich Christian — What Snowflakes Get Right꞉ Free Speech, Truth, and Equality on Campus (Oxford University Press, 2019).pdf

<a id="Мифы-правых-XXI-века"></a>
## Мифы правых XXI века

<!--- [N/QP]

[JOURNALISM_DEGREE] [The Guardian](https://www.theguardian.com/profile/nesrinemalik) — «is a Guardian columnist»

[NO_SCEDRECO]

[REVIEW_CHECK] 2021-8-30

[NO_REVIEW]

[NO_PDF] -->
1. Malik Nesrine — We Need New Stories꞉ The Myths That Subvert Freedom (W. W. Norton & Company, 2021).epub

<a id="Популизм"></a>
## Популизм

<!--- [ACADEMIC_DEGREE] Mudde — PhD, Political Science, University of Leiden — https://spia.uga.edu/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/CV_2015.pdf ; Ph.D. in Political Science, Humboldt University of Berlin — https://www.icso.cl/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/Cristobal-Rovira-CV-2017.pdf

[POSITIVE_OR_NEUTRAL_REVIEW][REVIEW_RETELLING] Elena Negrea-Busuioc, National University of Political Studies and Public Administration, Romania — https://www.ceeol.com/search/viewpdf?id=880159 — «Nonetheless, renowned political scientist and populism observer Cas Mudde and his long-time collaborator Cristóbal Rovira Kaltwasser deliver a well-documented, encompassing overview of populism and its intricacies, from a cross-regional perspective.», «On the contrary, the book raises fundamental claims about the core concepts of populism, about populism’s implications for democracy, as well as about strategies to cope with populist politics»

[REVIEW_RETELLING] Richard Berry is a Research Associate at Democratic Audit — https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/lsereviewofbooks/2017/07/18/book-review-populism-a-very-short-introduction-by-cas-mudde-and-cristobal-rovira-kaltwasser/ — «Overall, Mudde and Rovira Kaltwasser have produced a book that is both an accessible introduction to the study of populism and a mine of information on how it is practised around the world, as well as providing a coherent and measured intellectual critique of the ideology.»

David Murillo Bonvehí, Universitat Ramon Llull — https://www.e-revistes.uji.es/index.php/recerca/article/view/3525/3078 — «Entre las virtudes de sus apenas 131 páginas: la concisión, la claridad expositiva y la precisión de conceptos y teorías elaboradas principalmente desde la filosofía política. Entre sus debilidade s, con las que nos tropezaremos al final de esta reseña, el intento de universalizar su comprensión más allá de los patrones culturales e institucionales de Occidente y más allá de las democracias liberales.», «Los autores realizan a quí un problemático intento de vincular el populismo con el avance o el retroceso de la democratización en los diferentes estadios de desarrollo político que van desde el autoritarismo pleno a la democracia liberal.», «Si hacemos balance del texto en su conjunto, sobresale el abordaje riguroso de tem as complejos poco presentes en el debate habitual sobre el populismo.», «La crítica más evidente que podemos hacer al texto de Mudde y Rovira procedería de los déficits de la definición delgada que sostienen. Una definición tan laxa como omniabarcadora», «Igualmente, se echa de menos un capítulo final, tipo cajón de sastre, donde podrían aparecer otras discusiones realizadas más allá de la teoría política sobre el populismo.», «Igualmente, se echa de menos un capítulo final, tipo cajón de sastre, donde podrían aparecer otras discusiones realizadas más allá de la teoría política sobre el populismo. Entre los temas ausentes, apuntamos algunos. El rol de las emociones en política abordado los últimos años por Nussbaum (2018). La histórica confrontación entre ciudadanía y los intentos de ampliar la liberalización de nuestras vidas, discutidos por Polanyi (2016) y más recientemente por Streeck (2017), Rodrik (2018) o Pettifor (2017). O el rol de la utopía en la vida política y los movimientos 1 Cabe intuir.»

[REVIEW_LONG][REVIEW_RETELLING] Marina Jareño Romera — https://revistes.ub.edu/index.php/ACS/article/download/ACS2019.8.1/29219 — «Este es un texto breve que puede servir como un buen punto de partida para rastrear las muchas preguntas a las que los autores no responden, pero sí suscitan: ¿En qué circunstancias cabría esperar una presión y una función política que destaparan con rapidez los casos de corrupción? ¿Cuáles son las estrategias de activación de las masas? ¿Cuáles son las que emplean los populismos y cuáles son las que pueden incrementar la crítica y la autonomía de la población? ¿C ómo redirigir en otra dirección la actuación mediática mercantilista que favorece el discurso populista? ¿C uál es la línea que separa el discurso populista de la propaganda política ejercida en democracias, y en qué momento esta línea se rebasa?, etc.»

John Abromeit, Department of History, State University of New York, Buffalo State, Buffalo — https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/download/1146/1146 — «They provide a good overview of the transformation of populism in the U.S. over the course of the twentieth century from a predominatly progressive, to a predominantly reactionary movement—here again, however, without any attempt to explain why this shift occurred.», «Problemati-cally, they erect a firewall between fascism and populismby claiming rather simplistically that fascism was an elitist movement.», «Mudde and Kaltwasser also mention in pass-ing populist movements in other parts of the globe—thereby agreeing with Moffitt that populism is truly a global phenomenon—but with the limited amount of space allotted to them in a “very short introduction”, their discussion remains necessarily superficial.», «Mudde and Kaltwasser point out that notall populist leaders are charismatic. And sometimes, it isprecisely this lack of charisma which facilitates the pro-cess of identification. But Mudde and Kaltwasser do notpossess any sophisticated psychological concepts toex-plainsuch processes of identification, any more than doWodak or Moffitt.», «One problem, however, with this typology is that itposits liberal democracy as the most perfect form of gov-ernment possible.», «But, withthe partial exception of John Judis, contemporary studiesof populism seem better at describing than actually ex-plaining the ominous resurgence of right-wing populismin Europe and the U.S. in recent times»

[BOOK_OR_AUTHOR_OR_CONCEPT_CRITICISM] Carlos De la Torre, Professor, Department of Sociology, University of Kentucky — https://repositorio.flacsoandes.edu.ec/bitstream/10469/13714/1/REXTN-ED102-13-De%20la%20Torre.pdf — «Las teorías del populismo como ideo-logía, tienen una serie de problemas que discutiré a continuación. El primero es que, tiene una visión muy amplia del con-cepto de ideología, entendido como una serie de ideas políticas de cómo debe ser el mundo.», «El segundo problema del texto es que se lee al populismo desde Europa. A mi siempre me sorprendió la tozudez de quienes siguen esta teoría, al soste-ner que el líder no es parte central de la definición de populismo pues argumen-tan que, hay partidos en Europa sin lí-deres o hay movimientos horizontales. Es por esto que me pareció muy intere-sante se dedique un capítulo al lideraz-go populista. Sin embargo, en la discu-sión de líderes populistas femeninos, ni se menciona a Cristina Fernández de Kir-chner que a diferencia de Sarah Palin o Marine Le Pen, llegó a la presidencia.», «Mi tercer desacuerdo, es con el argu-mento que sostiene que no usan criterios normativos y aseguran que el populis-mo, puede ser a la vez un riesgo y un co-rrectivo para la democracia.», «Es necesario tener una teoría normativa para analizar por qué Chávez o Correa, que prometieron democracias reales y verdaderamente participativas, empujaron democracias débiles y en crisis, al autoritarismo.»

[REVIEW_SMASHER][CRITICISM_IDEAS] Prof. Dr. Georg Auernheimer — https://www.socialnet.de/rezensionen/26329.php — «Das im Titel versteckte Versprechen, man wisse nach der Lektüre, was Populismus ausmacht, wird nicht eingelöst, kann so nicht eingelöst werden. Die Autoren spiegeln eine Scheinklarheit vor. Viele Begriffe bleiben unbestimmt. Viele Aussagen erscheinen damit widersprüchlich oder ungereimt. Was kennzeichnet die „Elite“ oder die Eliten? Was ist „elitär“? Was verstehen die Autoren unter Minderheiten?», «Die analytische Beschreibung des heutigen demokratischen Systems, speziell der Funktion der Parteien darin (85), ist unzureichend. Der P. erscheint in der Darstellung verwirrend widersprüchlich, teils weil der scheinbaren Widersprüchlichkeit nicht auf den Grund gegangen wird, teils weil Begriffe unklar sind.», «Was P. vom politischen Mainstream unterscheiden soll, ist alles andere als klar. Die Aussage „Populisten wollen vor allem ihre Repräsentanten an der Macht sehen“ (86) gibt kaum ein Unterscheidungskriterium her.», «Fazit Eine wenig hilfreiche, eigentlich überflüssige Publikation.»

[ADDITIONAL_READING] Ruth Wodak’s — The Politics of Fear: What Right-Wing Populist Discourses Mean; 2) Benjamin Moffitt — The Global Rise of Populism

[BOOK_SERIES] Very Short Introductions

[NO_SCEDRECO] -->
<!-- lint disable write-good -->
1. Mudde Cas, Kaltwasser Cristóbal Rovira — Populism. A very short introduction (Oxford University Press, 2017).pdf
<!-- lint enable write-good -->

<a id="HC-3"></a>
### HC

<!--- [ACADEMIC_DEGREE] Не нашёл сведений об учёном звании Мюллера; однако «He has been a Member of the School of Historical Studies, Institute of Advanced Study, Princeton, and a visiting fellow at the Collegium Budapest Institute of Advanced Study, Collegium Helsinki, the Institute for Human Sciences in Vienna, the Remarque Institute, NYU, the Center for European Studies, Harvard, as well as the Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies, European University Institute, Florence. He has also taught as a visiting professor at the Ecole des Hautes Etudes en Sciences Sociales, Paris, the Ludwig Maximilians-Universitaet in Munich, the Humboldt Universitaet in Berlin, and the Institut d'Etudes Politiques, Paris.» — https://politics.princeton.edu/people/jan-werner-mueller . Проходит как профессор.

[POSITIVE_OR_NEUTRAL_REVIEW] Опилкин Алексей Сергеевич, кандидат исторических наук, сотрудник Центра социально-экономических исследований РИСИ — https://riss.ru/documents/816/a422d85092b244dbb1591fb47a28e591.pdf — «Подход к популизму Я.-В. Мюллера получил широкое признание в англо- и немецкоязычной академической сфере и, возможно, рано или поздно окажет влияние и на западных политиков.»

[REVIEW_LONG] Steven Schäller, TU Dresden — https://elibrary.utb.de/doi/pdf/10.3224/zpth.v7i2.06 — «Gleich-wohl aber konfrontiert Müllers Ansatz große Teile der Historikerzunft, insbesondere die Lateinamerikasektionen, mit dem Problem, Phänomene, die lange Zeit als Populismus in-terpretiert wurden, in Teilen nun nicht mehr so benennen und verstehen zu können.», «Populisten sind, wenn ich Müller richtig lese, zunächst und zuerst Feinde der li-beralen Demokratie, Feinde der Verschmelzung demokratischer Praxen mit liberalen, kon-stitutionellen Fesseln als Methode, in die ‚gefährlichen‘ Entscheidungen des Demos etwas Vernunft zu träufeln. Müller fängt diese Differenz in den anderen Charakterisierungen der Populisten als Anti-Liberale und Anti-Pluralisten wieder ein. Aber das lesen und hören scheinbar nicht immer alle. Die präzisere, jedoch auch umständlichere Formulierung könnte daher lauten, dass der Populismus ein anti-konstitutionelles Projekt ist und sich gerade ge-gen die moderierende Funktion liberaler Elemente in einer ansonsten schönen, reinen und unmittelbaren Demokratie richtet.»

Özgür Gökmen, the editor of Cumhuriyet Akademi — https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Oezguer_Goekmen/publication/318853847_Jan-Werner_Muller_What_Is_Populism_2016/links/5b3a054caca2720785017117/Jan-Werner-Mueller-What-Is-Populism-2016.pdf

[REVIEW_RETELLING] Dr. Y. Pınar Özmen, Yozgat Bozok Üniversitesi — https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Yasar_Pinar_Oezmen/publication/334109114_Populizm_Nedir_Kitap_Incelemesi_What_is_Populism_Book_Review/links/5d174916299bf1547c876ece/Popuelizm-Nedir-Kitap-Incelemesi-What-is-Populism-Book-Review.pdf?origin=publication_detail

[REVIEW_RETELLING] Roberto García Jurado, Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana — http://estudios.itam.mx/sites/default/files/estudiositammx/files/125/000286122.pdf

[REVIEW_RETELLING] Laura Sugamele, Università degli Studi "La Sapienza" di Roma ( https://uniroma1.academia.edu/LauraSugamele ) — http://dialetticaefilosofia.it/public/pdf/74recensione.pdf

[REVIEW_RETELLING] Rodrigo Farias de Sousa, Doutor em História. Professor de História IUPERJ/UCAM — https://periodicos.unifap.br/index.php/fronteiras/article/download/3188/rodrigov2n2.pdf — «O foco do autor são os Estados Unidos e a Europa, particularmente a do Leste, e mal sefala dos chamados regimes populistas latino-americanos:Perón só é citado uma vez, e Vargase Cárdenas, nem isso.»

Merényi Miklós, Corvinus University of Budapest ( https://uni-corvinus.academia.edu/mrnymkls ) — https://www.ceeol.com/search/viewpdf?id=609633 — «Azonban Müller könyve – talán a terjedelmi okok és a fentiekből fakadó diplo matikusság miatt – kevés fogódzóval szolgál annak elkerülésére, hogy egy másik szinten visszahulljunk a semleges szakértő objektiváló szerepébe. A szerző ugyanis a mű feszes mondanivalója mellett csak homályos utalásokat tesz arra, hogyan foglal állást abban a gyakorlatias kompromisszumban, amelyet a demokratikus rendszert veszélyeztető képviseleti igények megfékezése és ezen igények, mint a „népakarat” szükségszerű kifejeződései között kell elgondolnunk. Müller könyve ezzel együtt érdemi hozzájárulás egy olyan politikaelmélethez, amely nem ismeri félre a politika mozgásait és nem veti el őket anélkül», «Kérdéses azonban, mitől térne vissza a demokráciák önintézményesítő képessége napjainkban. Müller érezhetően kesztyűs kézzel bánik a baloldali egalitarizmussal, úgy tet szik, ennek részleges inkorporálását ajánlja amerikai olvasóinak. Bernie Sanders és társai igényeiben Müller voltaképpeni szociáldemokrata irányultságot lát, ezért nem is tekinti őket populistának.», «Müller fő meglátásait a posztszocialista populizmusok vizsgálatából meríti, ám eltekint attól, hogy Orbán vagy Kaczyński kritikája a fennálló alkotmányos rendszerekkel kapcsolatban mé lyebbre nyúlik, mint a 2008-as válság, egészen e rendszerek keletkezéséig.»

Bjørn Jespersen, Technical University of Ostrava — https://www.ceeol.com/search/viewpdf?id=706720 — «The author is openly in favour of democracy and openly against populism, but what I found appealing about the book is that it resists the temptation to speak condescendingly of populist voters, picturing them as unlettered, unwashed masses stoked up on hatred, disdain and aggression directed at everyone who is ‘them’ and not ‘us’.», «Müller ought perhaps to have spelt o ut in more detail the fact that the populist is not opposed to elites per se. First, the populists when politically successful become (part of) the elite themselves (though they would not label themselves as such, of course). Second, even when in opposition, the populists will look kindly upon those portions of the existing elites that serve the populist cause.», «This engaging monograph is a fine example of applied political philosophy. It is also exceptionally timely.»

Juan F González-Bertomeu, Instituto Tecnológico Autónomo de México, Maria Paula Saffon Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México — https://academic.oup.com/icon/article/15/4/1231/4872590 — «While the book concerns itself with populism under democratic or electoral rule, there have been many instances of non-democratic populism, many of them in Latin America (Velasco Alvarado in Peru, Somoza in Nicaragua, etc.), and some even with an allegedly left-wing leaning. Apart from the reoccurrence of elections (or lack thereof), one can legitimately ask whether there are any other differences between openly authoritarian populism and populism under electoral rule.», «The Spanish Podemos criticizes elites and at times uses a totalizing rhetoric, but is it really a populist movement on an equal footing with the likes of Erdoğan?», «The opposite risk is underinclusion. In Müller’s words, populists assume that the people issue something like an imperative mandate telling them what to do, so there really is no need for debate and participation. Yet at least some political regimes centrally identified as “populist” diverge from this picture. Again, Morales’s Bolivia is one.», «The view of populism Müller presents is a bit static, from opposition to the government and from one year to the next, when this is not necessarily so in all cases.», «None of the previous questions, we hasten to add, diminishes the great value of this book»

John Abromeit, Department of History, State University of New York, Buffalo State, Buffalo — https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/download/1146/1146 — «No doubt, Mudde and Kaltwasser’s approach, which makes room for progressive, bottom–up forms of populism, is more supple here. But Müller’s approach has the advantage of capturing one decisive aspect of right-wing populism that many commentators have overlooked, namely, its tendency to depoliticize its followers and to reduce democracy to a spectacle, in which passive citizens do nothing more than watch or listen to their leaders.», «But I would like briefly to discusstwo weaknesses I see in his approach, which he shareswith Mudde and Kaltwasser. The first is his positing ofliberal democracy as the unquestionable telos of modern politics.», «the question is whether or not hepossesses the conceptual tools to grasp the reasons whyliberal democracy has come increasingly under threat,from within, during the past few decades.», «Müller is too quick tocaricature and dismiss social-psychological explanationsof populism, such as Adorno and his colleagues’ analy-ses of the authoritarian personality.», «Not surprisingly, Müller is him-self explicitly critical of Laclau, yet he—like Mudde andKaltwasser—approach populism as a fundamentallypo-liticalphenomenon, and make little effort to systemat-ically explore the socio-historical and social psychologi-cal factors that have determined its success.»

[BOOK_OR_AUTHOR_OR_CONCEPT_CRITICISM] Prof. Dr. Dirk Jörke, TU Darmstadt — https://elibrary.utb.de/doi/pdf/10.3224/zpth.v7i2.04 — «Müllers Text hilft uns zu verstehen, wa-rum und in welchem Ausmaß der Populismus eine Gefahr für die liberale Demokratie darstellt, aber hilft uns leider nicht – und damit komme ich zu meinen kritischen Ausführungen – zu verstehen, wie wir dieser Gefahr begegnen können», «Jedenfalls wird von Müller zu wenig beachtet, dass sich in den vergangenen zwei, drei Jahrzehnten in Europa die politi-sche Landschaft stark verändert hat.», «Mein Unbehagen an der von Müller und so vielen anderen betriebenen politiktheoreti-schen Auseinandersetzung mit dem Populismus besteht nicht zuletzt darin, dass die Kollate-ralschäden des zeitgenössischen Liberalismus nicht reflektiert werden.», «Die Ausführungen von Michéa wie auch die von Rorty und Frank verweisen auf jene blinden Flecken eines liberalen Diskurses über den Populismus, für den der Text von Müller nur ein Beispiel unter vielen ist.»

[REVIEW_LONG] Prof. Dr. Karin Priester, emeritierte Professorin der Westfälischen Wilhelms-Universität Münster — https://elibrary.utb.de/doi/pdf/10.3224/zpth.v7i2.05 — «Bisweilen führt das bei Müller zu einer gewissen Sprunghaftigkeit, zu Abschweifungen und einseitig ausgewählten Belegen.», «Populisten, so seine Hauptthese, verstünden die politische Willensbildung als imperatives Mandat. Das bestreite ich.», «Diese These untermauert er noch mit den „Ver-trägen“, die Populisten mit dem Volk schließen. Aus der US-amerikanischen Politik dürf-te ihm aber bekannt sein, dass diese „Verträge“ in allen politischen Lagern verbreitet sind und nichts anderes als das Wahlprogramm einer Partei beinhalten. Bill Clinton versprach 1992 einen „New Covenant“, eine „feierliche Übereinkunft“ zwischen dem Volk und sei-ner Regierung. Der republikanische Politiker Newt Gingrich präsentierte sein Programm als „Contract with America“. Sind Clinton und Gingrich deswegen Populisten? Aus meiner Sicht verkennt Müller das spezifische Verhältnis von Führer und Geführ-ten im Populismus.», «Irritierend finde ich dagegen Müllers esoterische Digressionen zur Unfassbarkeit und Nicht-Darstellbarkeit des Volkes in seiner Gesamtheit, erst recht sein Dekret: „Demokra-ten müssen schlicht akzeptieren, dass das Volk als solches sich nie ganz fassen lässt“», «Leider übersieht er, dass sich auch die Gegenseite schwer tut, unliebsame Wahlergebnisse zu akzeptieren. Man erinnere sich an die Volks-abstimmungen zur EU-Verfassung in Frankreich und den Niederlanden 2005, die von der „Straße“ ins Parlament verlagert wurden, um das von der EU gewünschte Ergebnis zu er-zielen.», «Müller gebührt das Verdienst, die Debatten über Populismus wieder in demokratietheo-retische Bahnen gelenkt zu haben. Aber die Gattung des Essays verleitet auch zu einem gro-ben Pinselstrich und zu feuilletonistischem Impressionismus, etwa, wenn er mit souveräner Geste die weit verbreitete Gleichsetzung von populistischen Führern mit Charismatikern vom Tisch wischt.», «Grosso modo ist Müller auch darin zuzustimmen, dass es Populisten nicht um mehr Partizipation, sondern um Akklamation geht, auch wenn er seine Beispiele sehr selektiv auswählt. Mit Geert Wildersʼ Partij voor de Vrijheid (PVV) und Berlusconis Forza Italia hat er zwar leichtes Spiel, aber wie repräsentativ sind diese Fälle für „den“ Populismus?», «Ähnlich einseitig sind auch Müllers Ausführungen zu populistischen Herrschaftspraktiken.», «Auch Müller ist, bei allem Scharfsinn, ein Moralist, der rund siebzig Jahre nach Popper heute den Feind der offenen Gesellschaft im Populismus er-blickt. Dessen Gegner, die moralisch Guten, nennt er zwar „aufgeklärte Demokraten“, meint aber „aufgeklärte Eliten“. Müllers Hauptthese vom imperativen Mandat im Populismus halte ich für falsch. Aber er hat einen wichtigen Impuls ausgelöst, um erneut die Frage nach Sinn, Bedeutung und Reichweite von Demokratie aufzuwerfen. Über Populismus lässt sich gehaltvoll nur vor diesem Hintergrund diskutieren.»

[REVIEW_SMASHER] José Fernández Vega, Universidad de Buenos Aires — http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2395-86692018000400126 — «El autor rechaza fundar su caracterización en una lábil psicología política que parece inspirada en los prejuicios sobre el infantilismo emocional de las mayorías o las masas peligrosas heredados del siglo XIX. Toma distancia, asimismo, del desprecio de muchos comentaristas acerca del atraso rural y la escasa educación de una base social predominantemente masculina, si bien estas cualidades pueden manifestarse en ciertas variantes del populismo.», «Müller parece creer que, más allá de las declaraciones, las democracias de nuestro tiempo sí la promoverían, algo que su inclinación empírica podría fácilmente desmentir con la cifra de abstenciones electorales y las reiteradas alarmas por la apatía política general. Aplicada al pasado, dicha inclinación por los hechos permitiría constatar cuántos populismos se apoyaron en la actividad de las masas de un modo u otro (vale decir, liberando sus energías o controlando su despliegue).», «Según Müller, los populistas suelen confeccionar constituciones a medida de sus ambiciones y no validadas por el voto. Pero la Unión Europea ha dado ejemplos similares durante los últimos lustros por motivos que el propio Müller analiza al final de su libro y explica por las suspicacias respecto de la soberanía popular de los arquitectos de la Unión, escaldados por el pasado fascista del continente, que pretendían dejar atrás.», «La idealización de la democracia realmente existente es una debilidad del libro.», «Müller, sin embargo, considera al populismo como un producto patológico específico de las democracias representativas, cuyas “promesas incumplidas” (la referencia es a Norberto Bobbio) terminan engendrándolo. Un populismo histórico y emblemático, el de Juan Perón, invalidaría esta tesis.», «Resulta difícil compatibilizar semejante afirmación con el inexorable fiscal compact de Merkel y de su ministro Schäuble, por no hablar de la previa e indiscutible guerra al eje del mal de Bush Jr. Cuesta creer que un politólogo alemán que profesa en Princeton esté desinformado respecto de estas dos políticas que de algún modo configuraron nuestra época y, cuyos complejos efectos enardecen a las bases del populismo en su continente de origen.», «La idealización corre pareja con la demonización. Müller se respalda en ejemplos actuales. Hay escaso recurso a la historia en su ensayo, aunque allí se cite la frase de Nietzsche según la cual sólo se puede definir aquello que no tiene historia, y la del populismo es muy extensa y variada.», «El problema de Müller es que su examen deriva de una visión moralista de la democracia -sistema superior por definición-y es selectivo en sus ejemplificaciones. Su método coquetea con la sociología y la historia, pero no emprende un análisis detallado en esa dirección, sino que confronta un tipo ideal de democracia con un desfavorecido tipo real de populismo.»

Ingo Elbe, Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg — https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Ingo_Elbe/publication/326040527_Jan-Werner_Muller_Co_to_jest_populizm/links/5b34dcea0f7e9b0df5d3d815/Jan-Werner-Mueller-Co-to-jest-populizm.pdf?origin=publication_detail — «W analizie przyczyn aktualnej fali populizmu esej Müllera wypada jednak blado. Również jego re-cepty na poradzenie sobie z problemami, w swoisty sposób podejmowanymi i artykułowanymi przez populistów, pozostają na poziomie zwykłego moralizowania i przeoczają płynną granicę między nacjo-nalizmem tradycyjnych partii a populistycznymi dyskursami dyskryminacyjnymi», «Nie przeczę, że populistyczne ruchy konstruują opisywaną przez Müllera homogeniczną wolę narodu, którą ostatecznie wykorzystują do legitymacji swojej elitarystycznej i dyk-tatorskiej polityki. Jednakże pojęcie „antypluralizm” więcej zaciemnia niż rozjaśnia, gdy już samo, mające pozytywne konotacje, przeciwstawne pojęcie „pluralizm” skrywa wrzucone do jednego worka określone socjoekonomiczne antagonistyczne interesy oraz zwykłą różnorodność interesów», «Perspektywa czysto semantyczna i instytucjo-nalna (s. 65, 90 [wyd. niem.])10, jak również mglisty, a nawet wypaczony obraz podejścia psychologii społecznej do problemu populizmu (s. 35-36)11 prowadzą do nadwyżki części opisowej w jego analizie. Müller nie sili się nawet na wyjaśnienie fenomenu u jego podstaw.», «Przedstawienie parlamentarno-demokratycznych procesów pozostaje u Müllera bez oparcia w postaci teorii społecznej.»

Sławomir Drelich, Uniwersytet Mikołaja Kopernika w Toruniu ( https://www.wnopib.umk.pl/katedra-mysli-politycznej-2/pracownicy/dr-slawomir-drelich/ ) — http://cejsh.icm.edu.pl/cejsh/element/bwmeta1.element.desklight-06748748-49be-49e3-958c-0cbc4afd6dee/c/Slawomir_Drelich.pdf — «I rzeczywiście zapro-ponowane przez autora differentia specifica populizmu zdaje się byćtyleż ogólne, co mało przekony-wujące w świetle dotychczasowych badań nad populizmem.», «Rozczarowu-jące jest, iż autor rozważania swoje opiera na dość wybiórczo dobranej literaturze przedmiotu ichociażznaleźć można odwołania do prac Ernesta Gellnera, Ghity Ionescu, Benjamina Arditiego, Michaela Kazina czy Richarda Hofstadtera, to jednak brakuje odniesień do konkluzji ianaliz uznanych na całym świecie politologów zajmu-jących się populizmem, których prace stanowią swoisty kanon dla współczesnych badaczy tego zja-wiska. Odnieść można wrażenie, że literatura przedmiotu dobrana została wtaki sposób, aby oprzećkontrowersyjne niekiedy propozycje Müllera na wybranych celowo autorytetach świata akademickiego.», «Niestety również Müller – pomimo zamie-rzeń – ulega tej słabości. Tak jest bowiem zprzykładami przywo-ływanymi przez autora, zaś jego postawa – dostrzegalna chociażby wtrzecim rozdziale zatytułowanym Jak sobie radzić zpopulistami? –także zdaje się być skażona swo-istym lękiem przed współczesnymi populistami, który raczej nie powi-nien być manifestowany wnauko-wej pracy politologicznej.», «Müller twierdzi, że „nie może byćpopulizmu bez kogoś, kto przema-wiałby wimieniu narodu jako cało-ści” (s.41), tymczasem przyjęcie takiego założenia zmuszałoby nas do uznania, że wdobie demokracji parlamentarnej każdy polityk wal-czący o masowe poparcie jest nolens volens populistą.», «Tak widzący wspólnotę narodową (czy też lud) populiści – zdaniem autora – prze-konują, że „istnieje coś takiego jak jedno wspólne dobro, które naród jest wstanie rozpoznać iktórego pragnie” (s.47). Wydaje się jednak, że jest to jedna zcech typowych dla masowych partii politycznych działających wpaństwach demo-kratycznych, natomiast sama idea „dobra wspólnego” – posiadająca de facto źródła wklasycznej koncepcji polityki», «Ponadto Müller podkreśla, że „partie populistyczne mają szcze-gólną predylekcję do wewnętrz-nego autorytaryzmu” (s. 62), co jednakże nie do końca zgadza sięzdotychczasowymi ustaleniami badaczy populizmu, wskazującymi na istnienie zarówno autorytarnej wersji populizmu (typowej cho-ciażby dla nurtów latynoamery-kańskich), jak również jego wersji demokratycznej (indyjski gandyzm czy też polska tzw. Pierwsza Soli-darność)», «Trudno zgodzić się zprzekona-niem autora, iż wszystkie te cechy zawsze stanowić będą wyznaczniki populizmu – bardziej należałoby wiązać je zautorytaryzmem sensu stricto aniżeli zpopulizmem», «Wydaje się, że także wtym miejscu konkluzje Müllera zdają się abstrahować od faktu, iżpolitologom ihistorykom wsamym XXwieku udało się opisać różne wersje populizmu: bardziej demo-kratyczne ibardziej autorytarne; także takie, które wmniejszym lub większym stopniu podporząd-kowywały się ustrojowo-prawnemu status quo.», «Niezależnie od nieścisłości, cza-sami również sprzeczności, atakże nieuprawnionych generalizacji, książka Müllera słusznie podnosi coś, na co zwracali uwagę wszyscy dotychczasowi badacze populizmu, amianowicie na fakt, iż jednym zcelów populistów – wkażdym razie na poziomie deklaratywnym – jest chęć „dowartościowania tych części społeczeństwa, które dotych-czas były wykluczone”», «Większość bada-czy sugeruje jednak, że populizm nie jest nurtem ani prawicowym, ani lewicowym – jeśli mówić o nim jako o doktrynie politycznej czy ideologii (choć ico do tego nie ma zgody), wówczas należy przy-znać, że stanowi nurt eklektyczny», «Jego propozycja jednakże zdaje się być przy-najmniej niedopracowana iwielokrotnie abstrahować od klasycznych refleksji na temat populizmu. Największą warto-ścią jego pracy jest fakt, iż stara się on oprzeć ją na szeregu współczesnych przykładach, szczególnie zaś na przy-kładach europejskich.»

Emile Chabal, University of Edinburgh — https://sci-hub.se/10.1080/17496977.2017.1348026 — «The second chapter deals with what populists do once they are in power. Müller’s analysis isless clear-cut here.», «Finally, in the third chapter, Müller tries to offer a template for how to deal withpopulism. This is even less coherent than the second chapter.», «In the twenty-first century, it is rarely enough for populists simply to claim theyspeak for the people; the people must believe them too. So, while Müller offers a powerfuland persuasive framework for understanding the function of populism, he is less good atexplaining its recent successes. If nothing else, closer attention to the content of populist ideol-ogies would have reminded him that populism in contemporary democracies always dependson a fickle collusion between populist leaders and the fantasies of the people they claim to represent»

Nirupam Hazra, Bankura University — https://sci-hub.se/10.1080/14662043.2018.1516528 — «Müller believes properargument and evidence can make a difference and create a dent in populistsupport base. He illustrates this claim by referring to George Wallace’s 1968 pre-sidential campaign. But Müller does not show how effective it is in the current pol-itical context. Can a populist be countered with proper arguments and evidence ina post-truth world where truth has increasingly lost its relevance? In a world wherefacts are fudged and truths are manufactured, it will not be easy to challenge thepopulists with correct statistics», «Müller’s analysis of populism provides a refreshingly new dimension to theunderstanding of the phenomenon, but what still may trouble some of thereaders is the rise of populist leaders to power across the world. Müller fails toexplain this rise»

[REVIEW_LONG][REVIEW_SMASHER][REVIEW_HIGH_ERUDITION] Yannis Stavrakakis, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece; Anton Jager, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom — https://sci-hub.se/10.1177/1368431017723337 — «Especially since Mu ̈ller seems to ignore or downplay the importanceof previous theorizations of the phenomenon», «What Is Populism? reads more like a polemical pamphlet in the tradition of militant democracy (wehrhafteorstreitbare Demokratie) than a critical investigation.», «In a rather predictable way, having painted such a one-sided rendering of the phenomenon, Muller spends a fair chunk of his book orchestrating the liberal defences against its onslaught», «In opposition to Muller’s largely ahistorical and excessively normative», «Indeed, Mudde and Kaltwasserhere exhibit a clear understanding of the differences between the liberal and the democratic tradition, which allows them to avoid the largely a-historical equation between democracy and liberalism so ubiquitous in Muller», «in Muller’s passionless, numerically objective, liberaldystopia», «Muller seems to reduce human subjectivity to the most banal and rationalistic individualism, ignoring the symbolic and imaginary constitution of human reality as well as the crucial role affect, emotion, and passion play in socio-political life.», «Second, and mostimportant given the discredited status of its original formulation (see, for a detailedanalysis, Ja ̈ger, 2016; Stavrakakis, 2017), they place doubt on the plausibility of thiscriterion, which should be urgently reconsidered from scratch.», «Yet, the crucial problem with the criterion of moralization is not its origins and/or itsdubious intellectual trajectory; it is its precise status as one of the minimal criteria forthe differential identification of populism. Indeed, one is left wondering what such acriterion really means and how it could be effectively deployed.», «It is difficult, in other words, to substantiate an exclusive link of exaggerated orpathological types of moralization to populism.», «In Muller’s world, itis mainly populists who engage in the politics of fantasy – all the others seem to stick toreality and evidence-based politics.», «The accomplishments of the new mainstream in populismresearch, signified by these two interventions, will undoubtedly help contemporarycommentators get closer to a more adequate understanding of the complex creaturecurrently lying under their microscope. At the same time, their limitations will highlightthe fact that, as in Mary Shelley’s famed novella, this creature is very often constructed –at least partly – in line with the theoretico-political stereotypes of this last incarnation ofthe ‘modern Prometheus’, the populism researcher.»

[ADDITIONAL_READING] Thomas Frank, «What’s the matter with Kansas? How Conservatives Won the Heart of America»;

Ричард Рорти, «Обретая нашу страну»;

Karin Priester — «Populismus: Historische und aktuelle Erscheinungsformen»

[BOOK_SERIES] Политическая теория

[NO_SCEDRECO] -->
1. [Мюллер Ян-Вернер](https://politics.princeton.edu/people/jan-werner-mueller) — Что такое популизм (Высшая Школа Экономики, 2016).pdf

<a id="Ложь-и-постправда"></a>
# Ложь и постправда

<a id="Bullshit"></a>
## Bullshit

<!--- [ACADEMIC_DEGREE] [The Bloomsbury Encyclopedia of Philosophers in America: From 1600 to the Present](https://books.google.ru/books?id=XjM0CwAAQBAJ&pg=PA341) — «He obtained his BA from John Hopkins in 1949, and spent the next two years doing graduate work at Cornell University before returning to John Hopkins, receiving his MA in 1953 and PhD in Philosophy in 1954.»

[NO_ACADEMIC_DEGREE_TRANSLATOR] Ослон Михаил Владимирович, [disserCat](https://www.dissercat.com/content/aktsentnaya-sistema-yazyka-yuriya-krizhanicha) — «Акцентная система языка Юрия Крижанича. Диссертация на соискание учёной степени кандидата филологических наук». Год — 2009, год выпуска книги — 2008.

[ACADEMIC_DEGREE_EDITOR] Чечель Ирина Дмитриевна, [Энциклопедия профессионального образования](https://didacts.ru/termin/chechel-irina-dmitrievna.html) — «кандидат педагогических наук (1985), доктор педагогических наук (1993)»

[JOURNALISM_DEGREE_EDITOR] Павловский Глеб Олегович, [ГлобалМСК.ру](https://www.globalmsk.ru/person/id/123) — «С 1978 по 1980 член редколлегии журнала "Поиски". С 1988 по сентябрь 1993 председатель совета директоров информационного агентства "Постфактум". 27 сентября 1993 ушел с должности в знак протеста против действий Б. Н. Ельцина, давления на информационную политику "Постфактума" и ущемления свободы слова, однако остался владельцем и учредителем агентства. Печатался в газетах "Коммерсантъ", "Независимая газета", "Новая ежедневная газета", "Общая газета". С 1993 по 1994 член редакционного совета "Общей газеты". С декабря 1993 главный редактор обновленного журнала "Век ХХ и мир". С 1995 соиздатель международного журналистского обозрения "Среда".»

[POSITIVE_OR_NEUTRAL_REVIEW][REVIEW_HIGH_ERUDITION] Clancy W. Martin, University of Missouri, Kansas City, [Ethics](https://sci-hub.se/10.1086/498546) — «The real reason that the book, a piece of realphilosophy by one of our best, has become a smash hit among nonphilosophersis that, as Frankfurt remarks, our culture is swimming (or drowning) in bullshit.», «I think Frankfurt gets “the essence of bullshit” (as he humorously puts it) right: bullshit does seem to depend on a “lack of connection to a concern with truth», « Unfortunately, Frankfurt never tells us what it is that the bullshitter istrying to get away with, and that is a weakness in his account.», «But one would like to thinkthat the bullshitter is trying to accomplish more with his bullshitting than justmerely disguising the act itself. Otherwise, why bullshit at all? It would be mucheasier to accomplish the same end by simply keeping one’s mouth shut.», «A closely related issue that Frankfurt continually circles in the book butnever directly addresses is the bullshitter’s need to persuade his audience thathis bullshit is true.», «Frankfurt is clear about this issue when he discusses a “bullsession”: in a bull session, he writes, everyone knows that the bull being slungis just bull. But in other contexts Frankfurt wobbles on whether or not the bullshitter is trying to persuade his audience of the truth of his claims.», «And we should all be grateful to Frankfurt for re-minding us of the intellectual and ethical urgency for contemporary philoso-phers to take a close look at the nature of lying and other forms of deception. But this is where Frankfurt is also at hisweakest, because he surprisingly fails to recognize that he is writing in a longtradition of philosophical thought about deception.», «but otherwise he works as though he iswriting in a philosophical vacuum», «Indeed, from the outset he admits that he has not attempted to review the literature, but only because he (falsely) believes that “very little work has been done on this subject” (3). That may be true about bullshit as a word, but on the subject of bullshit as a concept the history of philosophy has quite a lot to say (all joking aside).», «But theories 1, 2, and 3 areall left essentially untouched and could have taken him a long way toward the solution to his problem of why we tend to think that bullshit is relatively harmlesswhile other kinds of deception, especially lying, are considered repugnant oreven evil.», «In the last few pages Frankfurt’s book gets even more interesting.», «he endswith the suggestion that “sincerity itself is bullshit” (67). These are claims hedoes not have time to defend, though we would like to hear his defense ofthem. Like most truly noteworthy philosophers, Frankfurt poses many morequestions than he answers»

Mario Gensollen Mendoza, Departamentode Filosofía, Universidad Autónoma de Aguascalientes, [Euphyía — Revista de Filosofía](https://revistas.uaa.mx/index.php/euphyia/article/download/20/12) — «A pesarde lo sensata —y cómica— que suena esta respuesta, falla en su profundidad. Frankfurt es consciente de que —aunque no lodice de esta manera— a pesarde que el descuido y la poca exigencia son condiciones suficientes de la charlatanería, no son condiciones necesarias. En otras palabras, aunque un productodescuidado y poco exigente suele ser bullshit, notoda bullshit es descuidada y poco exigente. Los casos paradigmáticos son las relaciones públi-cas, la publicidad y la política.», «¿Qué es propiamente lo que el Witt -genstein de su anécdota encuentra objetable? ¿Acaso no es esta anécdota una simple muestra del carácter neurótico e intolerante del gruñón austriaco? En este momento el ensayode Frankfurtse estanca en obstáculodifícil de librar. La elección de la anéc-dota no es la más adecuada. Es una anécdota tan simple y trivial que no alcanza a recoger el núcleodel asunto.», «A partirde este punto, el ensayode Frankfurt goza de una lu-cidez asombrosa.», «El brillante análisis de Frankfurt concluye con una refl exión en torno a las causas de la charlatanería.»

Göran Duus-Otterström, [Tidskrift för politisk filosofi](https://www.politiskfilosofi.se/fulltext/2007-1/pdf/TPF_2007-1_059-060_duus-otterstrom.pdf) — «Som begreppsanalys är On Bullshit lysande.», «Det finns dock en punkt där Frankfurt analys är oklar och det är vilken betydelse man skall tillmäta avsikten att skitsnacka. Enligt Frankfurt definieras skitsnacket av ett ointresse för sanning. Frågan vad den samvetsgranna men dåliga forskaren skall kallas förblir obesvarad eftersom det är oklart vilken ställning avsikten att skitsnacka skall tillmätas.», «Slutligen, som en parentes, tvivlar man ibland på önskvärdheten i att bekämpa skitsnack. Tvivlet väcks inte minst av den märkliga anekdot om Wittgenstein som Frankfurt diskuterar. Att bekämpa skitsnacket, liksom lögnen, inom forskningen eller politiken är naturligtvis nödvändigt eller i alla fall önskvärt. Men på andra plan framstår det som mindre passande – ja, rent av hjärtlöst.»

Kristijan Krkač, Zagrebaèka škola ekonomije i managementa, [Prolegomena: časopis za filozofiju](https://hrcak.srce.hr/file/6618) — «Knjiga poznatog etièara, profesora emeritusa Harryja Frankfurta, On Bullshit vjerojatno je tijekom 2005. godine bila najveæi filozofski hit u svijetu.», «Pitanje je onda – što je uopæe i je li moguæa “javna etika” ili je ona nuzno pri-vatna stvar pojedinca? No vjerujem da Frankfurt mozda i nije zelio tolikozaoštriti raspravu», « Na koncu valja kazati kako se usluèaju FrankfurtovaOn Bullshitradi o izvrsnom djelcu koje bez daljnjegpredstavlja majstorsko djelo analitièkog nasljeða, a koje je pritom i zabavno ipouèno.»

Alex Mauron, [Revue médicale suisse](https://archive-ouverte.unige.ch/files/downloads/0/0/0/8/4/0/8/3/unige_84083_attachment01.pdf) — «D'abord publié sous forme d'article, ce texte a connu sur Internet une notoriété extraordinaire, si bien que les presses de l'Université de Princeton l'ont republié sous forme de livre.»

Matthias Schmidt, Marburg, [MEDIENwissenschaft](https://mediarep.org/bitstream/handle/doc/7640/MEDREZ_2006_3_300_Schmidt.pdf) — «Hier muss sich Frankfurt allerdings die Kritik gefallen lassen, dass, wenn man an seinen Text den Anspruch an Wissenschaftlichkeit (oder Sachlichkeit) stellt, dieser schnell in die Nähe des Gegenstandes der eigenen Kritik geraten könne. Ange-sichts der essayistischen Form könnte man aber getrost von einer solchen Lesart des Buches absehen und sich den Kern seiner Aussagen zu Herzen nehmen und menschliche Aussagen kritischer reflektieren.»

Ann-Kathrin Hake, [Zeitschrift für Ideengeschicht](https://www.z-i-g.de/pdf/ZIG_2_2007.pdf#page=111) — «On Bull-shit, trotz aller Beschwerden der Rezensenten, ein anregendes, vielfach interpretierbares Buch, eine Publikation, die zumindest in der Funktion als Dissensanlaß und polemisches Gegenüber ihre Qualitäten erweist, so bestehen begründete Zwei-fel, ob OnTruth diese Funktion noch einmal über-nehmen kann.», «Es geht Frankfurt offenbar nicht um den Versuch, diese Varietäten auf eine ein-heitliche Wurzel des Übels «bullshit» zurückzuführen.», «In unverkennbar kulturkritischer Absicht dia-gnostiziert Frankfurt eine Abschwächung unserer Wahrheitsorientierung beim Reden, was nicht zu-letzt zu sinkenden Qualitätsstandards für die Re-de im öffentlichen Raum geführt habe.», «Dies–und dabei zugleich Frankfurts Schwäche–wird deutlicher, wenn man Seitenblicke auf Adornos JargonderEigentlichkeitei-nerseits, auf die Philosophie des späten Wittgen-stein andererseits wirft.», «Allerdings bürdet sich Frankfurt damit eine große Beweislast auf. Ist der Einfluß des Antirealis-mus in seinen verschiedenen Spielarten wirklich so weitreichend?», «Frankfurt müßte schließlich zeigen können, daß die Theorien seiner philosophischen Gegner ihre Wirksamkeit tatsächlich bis in die Niederungen der Alltagswelt entfalten, daß die verderblichen Wir-kungen ausschließlich oder hauptsächlich von ih-nen ausgehen und daß sie nicht etwa ihrerseits zu den verursachten Momenten eines epochalen Syndroms gehören.», «Verblüffenderweise schließt Frankfurt aber gleich zu Beginn seiner Überlegungen all jene komplizierten wahrheitstheoretischen und epistemologischen Fragen aus, die man unter dem erhabenen Titel eigentlich disku-tiert sehen möchte.»

Steven Livingston, Professor of Media and Public Affairs and Professor of International Affairs, George Washington University, [Political Communication](https://sci-hub.se/10.1080/10584600701641920) — «Published in 2005, Harry G. Frankfurt’s thin little volume, On Bullshit, remains oneof the more popular of the many books piled high in Amazon’s immense warehouses.»

Ricardo F. Crespo, [Cultura Económica](https://erevistas.uca.edu.ar/index.php/CECON/article/download/2605/2425) — «En fin, ambos pequeños libros son exce-lentes.»

Pablo Quintanilla, Profesor de la Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú, [Discusiones Filosóficas](http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0124-61272007000200018) — «Pienso que Frankfurt básicamente acierta en lo que sostiene, aunque me parece que dice algo de más, algo de menos y es un poco impreciso.», «Para comenzar, no resulta claro a quiénes se refiere Frankfurt cuando menciona a aquellos escépticos que no tienen interés en la verdad. Uno intuye que alude al pensamiento postmoderno, pero no hay una afirmación explícita.», «Por eso a la charlatanería de los relativistas que no creen en la verdad hay que añadir la de los fundamentalistas que sí creen en ella, que además creen poseerla y que, finalmente, consideran su obligación imponerla. La carencia principal del libro de Frankfurt, es no reparar en esa otra fuente de manipulación.»

Sílvio Paulo Botomé, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, [Interação em Psicologia](https://revistas.ufpr.br/psicologia/article/download/5806/4241) — «Seus exemplos e o tom coloquialmostram com riqueza e síntese o que está exposto emgrande extensão em outras obras.», «Para um psicólogo, o texto é uma boa fonte paraexaminar um tipo de comportamento das classes defuga ou de esquiva.», «O texto, apesar dotítulo que pode criar uma má impressão pela expressão chula que contém ou, com mais tolerância, pelavulgaridade que pode aparentar, é uma contribuiçãopara o exame de uma dimensão específica do com-portamento verbal: quando ele serve como fuga ou deesquiva de exigências maiores do que fazer barulho edistrair o interlocutor», «Talvez o livro deFrankfurt possa ser uma contribuição para aperfeiçoara análise de um tipo de comportamento humano quese tornou muito disseminado nos anos que já avan-çam, em tempo talvez não em desenvolvimento, parao século XXI»

Krzysztof Rojek, magister filozofii, doktorant na Wydziale Filozofii i Socjolo-gii UMCS w Lublinie, [Kultura i Wartości](https://yadda.icm.edu.pl/yadda/element/bwmeta1.element.ojs-doi-10_17951_kw_2015_16_103/c/2623-1897.pdf) — «Autor porzuca tym samym filozoficzną tradycję oraz pozostały kon-tekst historyczny na rzecz rozważaństricte problemowych. Skierowanie wykładu do nieakademickiego czytelnika przekłada sięponadto na tylko skromne nawiązania do współczesnych tekstów specja-listycznych.», «Nie odbiera to wykładowi Frankfurta błyskotliwości, nie pomaga jednak w wysokiej ocenie anali-tyczności i naukowości podejścia. Jako przeciwwagę dla powyższej kon-statacji można by jednak przywołać pogląd samego Frankfurta, że brak fachowej literatury przedmiotu czyni analizę zagadnienia interesującą, aczkolwiek merytorycznie trudną.», «Niewątpliwą zaletą książki Frankfurta jest jej forma: przystępny język oraz krótki, zwięzły wywód, opatrzony (acz nie przesycony) błyskotli-wymi przykładami wspierającymi główny wywód. Niski stopień abstrak-cyjności myśli oraz jej moralizatorski wydźwięk w końcowej części cz y-nią z wykładu Frankfurta książkę, której nie sposób nie polecić zarówno osobom stawiającym pierwsze kroki wśród filozoficznych dysput, jak i ich wytrawnym koneserom.», «Niezbyt liczne odwołania do literatury przedmiotu wynikają, jak już wspomniałem, z oryginalności podejmo-wanego zagadnienia oraz z przypuszczalnie popularyzatorskiej funkcji książki – ocenę tejże kwestii pozostawiam zatem czytelnikowi.»

Karl Pfeifer, University of Saskatchewan and Monash University, [Dialogue](https://philpapers.org/archive/PFEOBH.pdf) — «Frankfurt does set aside what he calls the “rhetorical uses and misuses of bullshit”; but unfortunately he provides no examples or characterizations of such uses, so this methodological move is too vague for proper assessment», «All these observations run contrary to Frankfurt’s characterization of bullshit. This suggests that bullshit is not capturable by a simple formula; if there are necessary and sufficient conditions to be had, their specification will surely require much ungainly disjunction.», «Nevertheless, I do think Frankfurt has provided a useful and illuminating analysis. It’s just that it’s limited to one paradigm.»

[BOOK_OR_AUTHOR_OR_CONCEPT_CRITICISM][REVIEW_LONG][REVIEW_SMASHER] Rocco J. Perla and James Carifio, University of Massachusetts, Lowell, [Interchange](https://gse.uml.edu/Carifio/pdf/Interchange-Full_BS-article-Franfurt.pdf) — «Frankfurt does, however, note the arbitrariness associated with the demarcation criteria for such a frequently and imprecisely used expression as bullshit, which evades a formal calculus presently.», «No, our disagreement is far deeper, and more fundamentaland important in the long as opposed to the short run of our tooinstantaneously focused and somewhat fixated culture.», «Although Frankfurt’s attempt toshed some light on this ubiquitous phenomenon is laudable, and his definition of bullshit reasonable and philosophically sound, his developing theoretical and conceptual view ofbullshit has oppressive undertones and consequences, and is severely limited and outdated from linguistic, cognitive science, and learningtheory perspectives – fields that have grown tremendously in the 20years since Frankfurt’s articlewas first published.», «Simply put, our discontent with Frankfurt’s BS construct isthat it is too naive and simplistic to account for the complexities of human thought, language, memory structures, learning, and representational systems that have been uncovered in the cognitive sciences over the past few decades.», «However, to just simply, superficially, andpejoratively dismiss (as Frankfurt does) all of these behaviors andinstances as BS, without addressing the enormous weight of evidence in the cognitive sciences and related fields», «However, this type of change, transition (and transformation) is not addressed in FIBS, which runs counter to decades of empirical research in the “novice to expert” continuum and developmental transformation, and basic research in the cognitive sciences (Ashcraft, 2002). Similarly, FIBS fails to address Chomsky’s (see Ashcraft, 2002) competence/performance distinction and Vygotsky’s (1978) zone of proximal development, both ofwhich require transitions and qualitative transformations in an individual’s ability to knowledgeably express her orhimself through language, social interaction and enculturation», «The problem with this statement is that it is a shallow, uninformed, and simply an incorrect biological (i.e., scientific) view of excrement.  In this passage, Frankfurt is taking the opportunity, or feels the compulsion, to speak about some topic (biology) that exceeds his knowledge of the facts that are relevant to that topic. In other words, Frankfurt is, by his own definition, talking bullshit. Further, he isnot only talking bullshit, bu the is missing the key and critical point about this phenomenon because of his (outdated and inaccurate) schemas about the phenomenon as well as the hidden flaws in the similes and metaphors he uses to explore and investigate it.», «Of course, another fundamental problem with FIBS is that it alsocompletely ignores Polanyi’s (1964) distinction between overt and expressive knowledge and tacit knowledge, and the idea that we are not always be capable of expressing (at least in logical terms or forms) what we in fact know.», «What FIBS fails to recognize is the dynamic nature ofthe cognitive elements that constitute the bullshit construct (such as language, learning, memory, consciousness, and thought), and that bullshit is veryoften (if not always) an important developmental phenomenon that can be refined over time in a way that leads to more complex (valid) knowledge structures and greater (valid) knowledge capacities. What is missing in FIBS – and also in many psychological, philosophical, and epistemological models and theories of knowing – is a balanced treatment of the irrational, silly, fanciful, deceptive, and emotive nature», «To Accept FIBS is to minimizethe positive and developmental effectthat the context ofdiscovery and metaphoric operations has had andcontinues to have on individuals and groups. In this regard, FIBS doesmore than throw the baby out with the bathwater: it both outlaws andshuts off the very act of creation!», «Frankfurt’s interpretation of BS(FIBS) implies antipsychologism, because it is apurely philosophicalanalysis of a concept that is largely informed by psychology and thecognitive sciences. Leading edge philosophers and cognitivists such asThagard would not consider this approach acceptable today.», «Is Harry Frankfurt’s theory of BS correct or BS? The answer to this question isthat Frankfurt’s theory of BS is largely incorrect and is,again by hisown definition, unquestionably BS. Frankfurt’s theory isBS because he feels the compulsion andneed todiscuss in detail alargely psychological concept without addressing any (never mindmodern) psychological concepts, principles, and views. The fact that Frankfurt would publish the same ideas and views over a 20year period with no consideration of the developments made in fields of study that most directly inform his theses suggests that the BS in his book is not even fresh or warm, but rather quite stale.», «As shown in Table 3, which summarizes the arguments and criticisms of FIBS in comparison RIBS (i.e., a more modern cognitive view), Frankfurt’s BS construct is overly simplistic, pejorative, “linear,” non-developmental, and embraces anti-psychologism and the context of justification as its guiding epistemology.», «What is more disconcerting than the limitations and short comings of FIBS is that somany educated people and teachers (including science educators) view this book as some sort of moral victory to be immediately implemented in the classroom. They fail to identify the problems of FIBS and to recognize its outdated, naive, simplistic, oppressive, and non-developmental thesis, relative to a concept that is so pervasive and actually very developmentally important in the classroom.»

[REVIEW_PERSONAL_COMMENTS] На месте Франкфурта возразил бы, что авторы рецензии критикуют чучело (strawman), а не изложенную им теорию. Франкфурт вряд ли запрещал процесс познания; 1) можно вполне сделать добавление, что слова становятся bullshit, когда их пиарят, продвигают 2) рецензенты, похоже, забыли, что признак bullshit — работа «тяп-ляп», отсутствие стремления быть истиной. Неупорядоченный процесс открытия, познания им не обладает. Рецензентам интереснее теоретизировать; ими не производится процесс различия «плохой» и «хорошей» bullshit, важный для практического применения.

[REVIEW_NO_ACCESS] Guido Vanheeswijck, [Streven: cultureel maatschappelijk maandblad](https://academic.microsoft.com/paper/2519052576/related)

[R/Phil]

[BOOK_SERIES] Идеологии

[ADDITIONAL_READING] Harry R. Frankfurt — «The Reasons of Love»

Гарри Гордон Франкфурт — «Об истине»

Harry G. Frankfurt — «Taking Ourselves Seriously and Getting It Right»

Harry G. Frankfurt — «The Importance of What We Care About: Philosophical Essays»

Sarah Buss, Lee Overton — «The Contours of Agency: Essays on Themes from Harry Frankfurt»

Bernard Williams — «Truth and Truthfulness: An Essay in Genealogy»

Sissela Bok — «Lying: moral choice in public and private life»

Clancy W. Martin — «Love and lies: an essay on truthfulness, deceit, and the growth and care of erotic love»

Simon Blackburn — «On Truth»

Шёк Гельмут — «Зависть: теория социального поведения»

Chris Heffer — All Bullshit and Lies? Insincerity, Irresponsibility, and the Judgment of Untruthfulness

Mendelson B. J. — Social Media Is Bullshit

Jevin D. West, Carl T. Bergstrom — Calling Bullshit. The Art of Scepticism in a Data-Driven World

Gary Hardcastle, George A. Reisch — Bullshit and Philosophy. Guaranteed to Get Perfect Results Every Time

Laura Penny — Your Call Is Important to Us: The Truth About Bullshit

Mark Peters — Bullshit: A Lexicon

G. A. Cohen — Finding Oneself in the Other

[NO_SOURCES] -->
1. Франкфурт Гарри Гордон — К вопросу о брехне (Европа, 2008).djvu

<a id="Pro-Truth"></a>
## Pro Truth

<!--- [Is/Mass]

[ACADEMIC_DEGREE] — [Ohio State University on Academia.edu, CV](https://osu.academia.edu/GlebTsipursky/CurriculumVitae) — «Ph.D. in History (focus in behavioral science), University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, NC, August 2011; Dissertation title: “Pleasure, Power and the Pursuit of Communism: State-Sponsored Youth Popular Culture in the Soviet Union, 1945—1968”»

[NO_ACADEMIC_OR_PROFESSIONAL_DEGREE] Tim Ward, [HuffPost](https://www.huffpost.com/author/tim-ward) — «Tim Ward is a communications expert, author, publisher, journalist and course leader.»

[NO_SCEDRECO]

[CRIM_CO-AUTHOR][CRIM_FEEDBACK_IN_BOOK]

[REVIEW_CHECK] 2021-8-25

[NO_REVIEW]

[AUTHORS_PROJECTS] Tsipursky — [Intentional Insights](https://intentionalinsights.org/about-intentional-insights-2/) — «We empower people to refine and reach their goals by providing research-based content to help improve thinking, feeling, and behavior patterns. We envision a world where individuals, organizations, and governments intentionally use research-based strategies to optimize their ability to evaluate reality clearly and make effective decisions, empowering all of us to live more happy, meaningful, altruistic, and flourishing lives.»; [Pro-Truth Pledge](https://www.protruthpledge.org/) — «The Pro-Truth Pledge is a project of Intentional Insights»

[NO_PDF] -->
1. Tsipursky Gleb, Ward Tim — Pro Truth꞉ A Practical Plan for Putting Truth Back into Politics (Changemakers Books, 2020).epub

<a id="Информационные-войны"></a>
## Информационные войны

<!--- [INFO] Множество спорных утверждений, но в обе стороны.

[ADDITIONAL_READING] Георгий Валентинович Вирен, Фролова Татьяна Ивановна — Информационные агентства. Как создаются новости
-->
1. [Вирен Георгий Валентинович](https://dic.academic.ru/dic.nsf/enc_biography/129752/%D0%92%D0%B8%D1%80%D0%B5%D0%BD) — Современные медиа. Приёмы информационных войн (Аспект Пресс, 2013).pdf

<a id="Конкурирующие-правды"></a>
## Конкурирующие правды

<a id="NR-25"></a>
### NR

<a id="Непрофессионализм-3"></a>
#### Непрофессионализм

<!--- [ACADEMIC_DEGREE] Если верить его собственному сайту, Макдональд не имеет учёной степени и не является профессионалом (например, журналистом или фактчекером) в тематике — https://www.hectormacdonald.com/

[BOOK_CRITICISM] Серьёзного ничего не нашёл, разве что такое — https://www.washingtonpost.com/outlook/truth-isnt-always-as-firm-as-we-think-it-is/2018/03/09/ecaf53a0-0d00-11e8-8890-372e2047c935_story.html — “Regrettably, "Truth" is written in the self-consciously superficial style of the airport business book, seemingly in the hopes of attracting readers of bestselling authors”

[INFO] В книге имеется множество ссылок на источники, однако для книги на такую тематику этого недостаточно

[INFO] Возможно, следует выделить «мягкую» категорию в «Ad»

[NO_PDF] -->
1. Макдональд Гектор — Правда. Как политики, корпорации и медиа формируют нашу реальность, выставляя факты в выгодном свете (Альпина Паблишер, 2019).fb2

<a id="Манипулирование"></a>
## Манипулирование

<a id="Манипуляция-сознанием"></a>
### Манипуляция сознанием

<a id="NR-26"></a>
#### NR

<a id="Недостоверная-информация-4"></a>
##### Недостоверная информация

<!--- [ACADEMIC_DEGREE] Кара-Мурза — доктор химических наук, https://xn--h1aauh.xn--p1ai/people/kara-murza_sergey/ . Учёных званий Кара-Мурзы по теме работы не нашёл.

[NO_SCEDRECO]

[BOOK_CRITICISM] Скиф Рэд (Руслан Баженов) https://scepsis.net/library/id_1859.html . Как и само произведение, критика выполнена в публицистическом стиле — https://scepsis.net/authors/id_111.html . https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%9A%D0%B0%D1%80%D0%B0-%D0%9C%D1%83%D1%80%D0%B7%D0%B0,_%D0%A1%D0%B5%D1%80%D0%B3%D0%B5%D0%B9_%D0%93%D0%B5%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%B3%D0%B8%D0%B5%D0%B2%D0%B8%D1%87#%D0%9E%D1%82%D0%B7%D1%8B%D0%B2%D1%8B_%D0%BD%D0%B0_%D0%BF%D1%83%D0%B1%D0%BB%D0%B8%D1%86%D0%B8%D1%81%D1%82%D0%B8%D1%87%D0%B5%D1%81%D0%BA%D0%B8%D0%B5_%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%B1%D0%BE%D1%82%D1%8B — критика разной степени авторитетности -->
1. [Кара-Мурза Сергей Георгиевич](https://xn--h1aauh.xn--p1ai/people/kara-murza_sergey/) — Манипуляция сознанием (Эксмо, 2000).pdf

<a id="Медиаманипулирование"></a>
### Медиаманипулирование

<a id="NR-27"></a>
#### NR

<a id="Репутация-автора"></a>
##### Репутация автора

<!--- [NOTE] См. интервью Соловья Дмитрию Гордону о тайной организации — https://youtu.be/vE88hG4FsyE?t=3389 -->
1. [Соловей Валерий Дмитриевич](https://mgimo.ru/people/solovey/) — Абсолютное оружие. Основы психологической войны и медиаманипулирования (Издательство «Э», 2016).djvu

<a id="Разновидности-манипулятивных-воздействий"></a>
### Разновидности манипулятивных воздействий

<a id="NR-28"></a>
#### NR

<a id="Непрофессионализм-4"></a>
##### Непрофессионализм

<!--- [NOTE] Не нахожу подтверждений в авторитетных источниках, что это действительно «кандидат философских наук, психолог и социолог, специалист по логике и риторике».

-->
1. Таранов Павел Сергеевич — Интриги, мошенничество, трюки. Психология знаменитых ситуаций (Реноме, 1997).djvu

<a id="Пиар"></a>
## Пиар

<a id="Конструирование-пиаром-ложных-представлений-по-важнейшим-вопросам"></a>
### Конструирование пиаром ложных представлений по важнейшим вопросам

<!--- [N/QP]

[PROFESSIONAL_DEGREE] Rampton, [Wikipedia](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sheldon_Rampton#Career) — «Upon graduation in 1982, Rampton worked as a newspaper reporter before becoming a peace activist. During the 1980s and 1990s, he worked closely with the Wisconsin Coordinating Council on Nicaragua (WCCN), which opposed the Reagan administration's military interventions in Central America and works to promote economic development, human rights, and mutual friendship between the people of the United States and Nicaragua. At WCCN, Rampton helped establish the Nicaraguan Credit Alternatives Fund (NICA Fund) in 1992, which channels loans from US investors to support microcredit and other "alternative credit" programs in Nicaragua.», «In 1995, Rampton teamed with John Stauber as co-editors of PR Watch, a publication of the Center for Media and Democracy (CMD).», «Rampton is also a contributor to the Wikipedia open content project, and was the person who coined the name "Wikimedia" which later became the name of the foundation that manages Wikipedia and its sister projects. Inspired by Wikipedia's collaborative writing model, Rampton founded Disinfopedia (now known as SourceWatch), another CMD project, to complement his PR Watch work to expose what Rampton perceives as deceptive and misleading public relations campaigns.», «After leaving the Center for Media and Democracy in 2009, Rampton became a website developer, joining an open government initiative led by New York State Senate chief information officer Andrew Hoppin. In 2010, Hoppin and Rampton co-founded NuCivic, an open source software company, which they sold in December 2014 to GovDelivery, a software services company now known as Granicus. Rampton currently works as a software engineer at Granicus.»

[PROFESSIONAL_DEGREE] Stauber, [Wikipedia](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Stauber) — «Stauber is the founder and former executive director of the Center for Media and Democracy, which sponsors PR Watch and SourceWatch. Since the 1960s, he has worked with public interest, consumer, family farm, environmental and community organizations at the local, state and national level. He edits and writes for the Center's quarterly newsmagazine, PR Watch. He is also a member of the Liberty Tree Board of Advisers.»

[MEDIA_CHECK] [Media Bias/Fact Check](https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/center-for-media-and-democracy/) — «Overall, we rate the Center for Media and Democracy Left Biased based on editorial positions that always favor the progressive left. We also rate them High for factual reporting due to proper sourcing and a clean fact check record. (8/15/2017) Updated (D. Van Zandt 01/25/2021)»

[CRIM_FINANCING] [Influence Watch](https://www.influencewatch.org/non-profit/center-for-media-and-democracy/) — «As Center for Media and Democracy’s profile has risen in recent years, the group has faced criticism for its hypocrisy regarding donor disclosure. While CMD lists a selection of the foundations which fund it, the group also takes substantial money from anonymous contributors through donor-advised funds—in other contexts decried by CMD as “dark money.” In 2011, CMD received over 60 percent of its revenue from a single donor-advised fund.»

[REVIEW_CHECK] 2022-1-18

[POSITIVE_OR_NEUTRAL_REVIEW][REVIEW_ONE_PAGE] Ginger Rudeseal Carter, Georgia College & State University, [Journalism & Mass Communication Educator](https://sci-hub.se/10.1177/107769589705200110) — «Well, you don’t have to like this book, but you shouldn’tignore it-neither should the public relations practitioner,professor, or student.», «In its examination of these public relations campaigns, Toxic Sludge doesn’t mince words or balance pro-and-con the public relations industry; this is no gentle book. All the cases show how practitioners bent-and often broke-the truth to serve the client.», «A book like this is important to the public relations classroom.», «Any of the chapters would be useful in a media ethics course.», «Toxic Sludge i s Good For You could become a standard, like Ralph Nader’s Unsafe at Any Speed or Jessica Mitford’s The American Wayof Death. You don’thave to like it, but you ought to read it»

[REVIEW_ONE_PAGE] Jean-Guillaume Lanuque, [Dissidences](https://preo.u-bourgogne.fr/dissidences/index.php?id=610) — «Voilà un petit ouvrage à mettre entre toutes les mains, élément essentiel de la panoplie de l’honnête citoyen.»

Sharon Beder, University of Wollongong, [Metascience](https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Sharon-Beder/publication/225641441_Manipulating_Public_Knowledge/links/02e7e529fb25953c60000000/Manipulating-Public-Knowledge.pdf), “Manipulating Public Knowledge” — «Stauber and Rampton document and expose, in a highly accessible way, the various strategies that public relations firms use in defending the undesirable practices of their clients and in countering activists who attempt to expose those practices to the public.»

Sophie Louey, Doctorante en sociologie (allocataire de recherche) à l'Université Picardie Jules Verne, [Lectures](https://journals.openedition.org/lectures/9322) — «Le coeur de cet ouvrage est de démontrer que la propagande, loin d’être réservée aux régimes autoritaires, est une pratique très utilisée par les acteurs « dominants » des démocraties.», «La grande honnêteté des auteurs réside dans l’exposition permanente de leurs sources et dans leur constance à toujours nommer les individus impliqués dans chaque affaire.», «Cependant, malgré l’ambition affichée des auteurs d’élargir leur étude à des cas européens, on remarquera que la question de l’émergence du lobbysme « ailleurs » qu’aux États-Unis, et plus particulièrement en Europe est relativement absente de cette réédition. Si les origines étatsuniennes sont bien identifiées par les auteurs, la diffusion du modèle, elle, l’est beaucoup moins. Ce manque de données ne permet pas de saisir qu’il existe de profondes divergences entre le lobbying institutionnalisé des États-Unis et la forme qu’il prend en Europe.», «De façon très documentée, les journalistes présentent de nombreux exemples américains de manipulations de masse comme celui de l’industrie du tabac», «Remarquons que tous les exemples choisis touchent au « quotidien » des individus et c’est ce qui rend l’étude très accessible même aux non initiés à cette problématique; il faut bien reconnaître que c’est là une force du texte. Au fil de ce dernier c’est tout un tableau des pratiques de « pressions », opérées par des groupes d’individus présentés comme peu scrupuleux, qui est exposé.», «En dénonçant et, là encore, en nommant ces associations aux buts obscurs, les journalistes semblent appeler leurs lecteurs à la vigilance tout en confirmant leur posture plus militante que scientifique.», «Le coe ur de l’ouvrage est ainsi de dénoncer le poids des lobbyistes dans des champs sociaux multiples, qu’ils soient politiques, humanitaires, économiques ou encore scientifiques, à une époque marquée par l’hypermédiatisation. Si l’on peut louer les qualités de ce journalisme d’investigation, on pourra cependant regretter la (trop) grande prégnance de la dimension militante qui, bien que louable, ne permet pas de dresser une description suffisamment complexe et nuancée de son objet. En effet, s’il est aisé de reconnaître que l’usage des pressions décrites sert les intérêts de « grands acteurs » (groupes industriels, hommes politiques etc.), il n’en demeure pas moins que les « petits acteurs » (ceux qui pratiquent ce lobbying) apparaissent fortement diabolisés et finalement assez peu « connus » dans la mesure où s’il est possible de savoir pour qui ils marchent, on ne peut pas comprendre pourquoi ils s’engagent dans cette pratique. La motivation financière de ces groupes d’individus, parfois évoquée à demi-mot par les auteurs (notamment en termes de « salaire » ou de « commissions » perçues), n’est probablement pas le seul facteur expliquant la motivation à la base de leur activité. Ainsi le parti pris des auteurs en faveur de la « dénonciation » ne permet pas toujours d’accéder à l’explication et ce malgré la part prégnante de la description.», «Si globalement l’ouvrage est parcouru par des postulats négatifs voire alarmistes, la volonté des auteurs reste d’armer les citoyens pour les inviter à réenchanter ce qu’ils jugent être un monde désenchanté par les lobbyistes.»

Gérald Arboit, CERIME, université Strasbourg 3, [Questions de communication](https://journals.openedition.org/questionsdecommunication/7978) — «Bien que l’éditeur se garde de le préciser, la lecture de ce livre, très bien documenté, laisse entrevoir un manque d’actualité. (…) Toutefois, ce travail de décryptage est éclairant et inquiétant à tout point de vue, même s’il faut lui appliquer la double grille de lecture proposée par les auteurs originaux et le point de vue de l’édition française.», «La charge est certainement féroce et orientée politiquement. Ainsi ne présente-t-elle pas les « spin doctors » (conseillers en communication) de l’altermondialisme et l’écologie militante, comme Greenpeace.», «De même, l’ardeur à dénoncer la collusion des médias et leur confusion entre information et communication fait oublier aux auteurs qu’à l’origine de la dénonciation du lobby du tabac aux États-Unis, en 1993, il y eut toute l’ardeur d’un journaliste, Lowell Bergman, producteur de l’émission vedette de CBS, 60 Minutes.»

[REVIEW_RETELLING] Carmelo Ruiz Marrero, Instituto de Ecología Social en Vermont, [Observatorio Latinoamericano de Conflictos Ambientales](https://olca.cl/oca/comunica/revista01.htm) — «En resumidas cuentas, Toxic Sludge Is Good for You es lectura recomendada para activistas que deseen conocer el arsenal de trucos sucios que son usados contra ellos por intereses comerciales.»

[BOOK_OR_AUTHOR_OR_CONCEPT_CRITICISM][REVIEW_ONE_PAGE] Burton St. John III, St. Louis, Missouri, [Public Relations Review](https://sci-hub.se/10.1016/s0363-8111%2896%2990008-9) — «I am in my sixth year of public relations work for the U.S. Postal Service. In this admittedly brief time, I have not had the misfortune to work for, or with, the kind of public relations person Stauber and Rampton portray.», «A well-written, sometimes unbelievable expose of this pat of the PR industry, Toxic Sludge suffers only because of its one-note insistence that public relations invariably hurts democracy by promoting business interests over the interests of individual consumers.», «While discussing common PR approaches to the media, like video news releases, media monitoring services and third-party experts, the authors occasionally veer off into Conspiracy Land.», «However, the authors’ contention of PR manipulation here rings false because it rests on the mistaken assumption that the client is beholden to the agency and not the other way around.», «This belief of PR’s massive conspiratorial power (PR can get a reporter taken off his beat?) is what undermines Toxic Shock. The authors do have a good handle on the shady characters in the business. But they insist that these blemishes reveal PR’s true intent-to undermine the democratic process. However, the sheer amount of competing messages put out everyday in our society by governments, interest groups, citizen groups and yes, different PR agencies, reflects democracy in action and makes simplistic their contention that “PR firms . . . manipulate our minds.” Realistically, PR can only attempt to persuade and no amount of poor judgment by some public relations people can change that.»

[REVIEW_NO_ACCESS] Paul Swift, [Public Relations Quarterly](https://www.proquest.com/docview/222387686)

[AUTHORS_PROJECTS] [The Center for Media and Democracy, PR Watch](https://prwatch.org/cmd) — «The Center for Media and Democracy (CMD) is a nationally recognized watchdog that leads in-depth, award-winning investigations into the corruption that undermines our democracy, environment, and economic prosperity.»

[SourceWatch](https://www.sourcewatch.org) — «We Track Corporations and PR Spin», «We provide well-documented information about corporate public relations (PR) campaigns, including corporate front groups, people who "front" corporate campaigns, and PR operations.»

[NOTE_FULL_NAME] Rampton Sheldon, Stauber John Clyde — Toxic Sludge is Good For You. Lies, Damn Lies and the Public Relations Industry (Common Courage Press, 1995).djvu

-->
1. Rampton Sheldon, Stauber John Clyde — Toxic Sludge is Good For You (Common Courage Press, 1995).djvu

<a id="Основы-PR-пропаганды"></a>
### Основы PR-пропаганды

1. [Бернейс Эдвард](https://archive.nytimes.com/www.nytimes.com/books/98/08/16/specials/bernays-obit.html?mcubz=3) — Пропаганда (Гиппо Паблишинг, 2010).pdf

<a id="Поляризация"></a>
## Поляризация

<a id="Догматизм-в-поляризованном-обществе"></a>
### Догматизм в поляризованном обществе

<a id="Общество-всезнаек"></a>
#### Общество всезнаек

<!--- [Is/Mono]

[ACADEMIC_DEGREE] [University of Connecticut, CV](https://michael-lynch.philosophy.uconn.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/392/2016/01/Lynch-CV-2015-2.pdf) — «Ph.D. in Philosophy, Syracuse University, 1995»

[CRIM_SPEAKER] [TED](https://www.ted.com/speakers/michael_lynch)

[NO_SCEDRECO]

[REVIEW_CHECK] 2021-8-7

[POSITIVE_OR_NEUTRAL_REVIEW][REVIEW_RETELLING] Dennis S. Gouran, Pennsylvania State University, [International Journal of Communication](https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/viewFile/14714/3048) — «Readers of the International Journal of Communication should find Lynch’s analysis to be of particular interest, especially in light of the attention he devotes to the role that social media», «Lynch has written a work of considerable intellectual merit but that does not require a necessarily strong background in the scholarly and philosophical literature on which he draws. He fails to address, however, what implementation of his suggestions and recommendations entails, or where the locus of leadership properly resides.», «Ideally, his thinking about the serious concerns he raises will achieve voice and dissemination initially through formal educational channels in the expectation that it ultimately will reach a substantially larger audience as a consequence of how those who study what Lynch has to say model in their own behavior in their interactions with others. Let us hope so, as there otherwise may not be a great deal of time before the warning that Montaigne sounded and that inspired the present work will serve to prevent the worst of what intellectual arrogance can bring about.»

[NO_PDF] -->
1. Lynch Michael Patrick — Know-It-All Society꞉ Truth and Arrogance in Political Culture (Liveright Publishing, 2019).epub

<a id="Пропаганда"></a>
## Пропаганда

<a id="Антироссийская-пропаганда"></a>
### Антироссийская пропаганда

<a id="NR-29"></a>
#### NR

<a id="Недостоверная-информация-5"></a>
##### Недостоверная информация

<!--- [NOTE] Категория «Ad»:
1. Ильин — доцент кафедры психологии; других учёных званий он не имеет.
2. Книга имеет рецензента — профессора кафедры международных отношений Андрея Ивановича Пальцева — https://www.sbras.ru/files/news/docs/nagrazhdaemye_den_rossiyskoy_nauki.pdf#page=3
3. Тема в книге рассматривается односторонне. Как темы Скрипалей, Магнитского и Немцова.
4. Стиль: используются термины «янки», «англосаксы».
5. Фейковая цитата: https://www.currenttime.tv/a/29292463.html
6. В ВАКовских журналах Ильин писал на тему консьюмеризма, не русофобии. См. список публикаций в книге «Наше потребительское настоящее».

[ADDITIONAL_READING] А. А. Гостев — «Глобальная психоманипуляция» в «Ad»

«Западное сознание не лечат «общечеловеческие ценности», навязываемые самим же этим сознанием всему миру. Действительно, здоровы ли на сущностном, нравственном уровне люди, не видящие современного Содома и Гоморры и строящие новый Вавилон? Традиционная семья объявляется анахронизмом. Провозглашается свобода «убийства во чреве», признается суррогатное материнство, в разлучении детей и родителей по мелочным и сомнительным «ювенальным» причинам не усматривается насилия. Идея половых различий отходит на задний план (кстати, показательно, что современный эталон женской красоты предполагает «отсутствие женских форм», нацеленных на репродуктивную функцию). Слышны громкие призывы уважать право ребенка на сексуальную ориентацию. Во многих английских школах детей в возрасте до 16 лет обучают технике секса, в ряде школ Израиля занятия по гомосексуализму проводят гомосексуалисты (считается, что это помогает выработке толерантного отношения к ним).»
 -->
1. [Ильин Алексей Николаевич](https://omgpu.ru/person/ilin_an) — Пропагандистская атака на Россию (Русайнс, 2019).pdf

<a id="Пропагандистские-методы-и-техники"></a>
### Пропагандистские методы и техники

1. [Сороченко Виктор Анатольевич](https://psyfactor.org/autors/sorochenko.htm) — Энциклопедия методов пропаганды (Харвест, 2006).epub

<a id="NR-30"></a>
#### NR

<a id="Непрофессионализм-5"></a>
##### Непрофессионализм

<!--- [NOTE] Не нашёл подтверждения наличия научных регалий у Magedah Shabo (https://twitter.com/magedah_shabo); она не ссылается на источники -->
1. [Shabo Magedah](https://www.amazon.com/Magedah-E.-Shabo/e/B0038NT7HI) — Techniques of Propaganda and Persuasion (Prestwick House, 2008).epub

<a id="Психология-пропаганды"></a>
### Психология пропаганды

1. [Аронсон Эллиот](https://psychology.ucsc.edu/about/people/faculty.php?uid=elliot), [Пратканис Энтони](https://www.sec.gov/spotlight/seniors/bios/anthony_pratkanis.pdf) — Эпоха пропаганды. Механизмы убеждения. Повседневное использование и злоупотребление (Прайм-ЕВРОЗНАК, 2002).pdf

<a id="Радикальная-честность"></a>
## Радикальная честность

<!--- [INFO] Harris — PhD by cognitive neurobiology

[ADDITIONAL_READING] George Serban — Lying: Man's Second Nature

Timur Keran — Private Truths, Public Lies

Bruce Schneier — Liars and Outliers: Enabling the Trust that Society Needs to Thrive

Stephen Greenspan — Annals of Gullibility: Why We Get Duped and How to Avoid It

Robert Feldman — The Liar in Your Life: The Way to Truthful Relationships
-->
1. [Харрис Сэм](https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%A5%D0%B0%D1%80%D1%80%D0%B8%D1%81,_%D0%A1%D1%8D%D0%BC) — Ложь. Почему говорить правду всегда лучше (Альпина Паблишер, 2015).pdf

<a id="Распознавание-лжи"></a>
## Распознавание лжи

<a id="NR-31"></a>
### NR

<a id="Критика-научного-сообщества"></a>
#### Критика научного сообщества

<!--- [ADDITIONAL_READING] Witkowski Tomacz — «Psychologia klamstwa» 

[BOOK_OR_AUTHOR_OR_CONCEPT_CRITICISM] Sharon Weinberger, [Nature](https://go.gale.com/ps/i.do?p=AONE&u=googlescholar&id=GALE|A228122012&v=2.1&it=r&asid=624601b9) — «Yet a growing number of researchers are dubious--not just about the projects themselves, but about the science on which they are based. "Simply put, people (including professional lie-catchers with extensive experience of assessing veracity) would achieve similar hit rates if they flipped a coin," noted a 2007 report (1) from a committee of credibility-assessment experts who reviewed research on portal screening.», «"No scientific evidence exists to support the detection or inference of future behaviour, including intent," declares a 2008 report prepared by the JASON defence advisory group. And the TSA had no business deploying SPOT across the nations airports "without first validating the scientific basis for identifying suspicious passengers in an airport environment", stated a two-year review of the programme released on 20 May by the Government Accountability Office (GAO), the investigative arm of the US Congress.»
-->
1. [Экман Пол](http://www.hrono.info/biograf/bio_e/ekmanpol.php) — Психология лжи. Обмани меня, если сможешь (Питер, 2009).pdf

<a id="Речевое-манипулирование"></a>
## Речевое манипулирование

<!--- [INFO] В рецензентах доктор филологических наук Александр Петрович Сковородников — https://structure.sfu-kras.ru/node/1509 и кандидат филологических наук Ольга Николаевна Емельянова — https://structure.sfu-kras.ru/node/2597

[ADDITIONAL_READING] W. Lance Bennett, Regina G. Lawrence, Steven Livingston — «When the Press Fails: Political Power and the News Media from Iraq to Katrina (Studies in Communication, Media, and Public Opinion)»

W. Lance Bennett, Steven Livingston — «The Disinformation Age: Politics, Technology, and Disruptive Communication in the United States»

Ralph Keyes — «The Post-Truth Era: Dishonesty and Deception in Contemporary Life»

Ari Rabin-Havt — «Lies, Incorporated: The World of Post-Truth Politics»
-->
1. [Копнина Галина Анатольевна](https://structure.sfu-kras.ru/node/1225) — Речевое манипулирование. Учебное пособие (Флинта, 2012).pdf

<a id="Фейковые-новости"></a>
## Фейковые новости

<a id="Психология-воздействия-фейковых-новостей"></a>
### Психология воздействия фейковых новостей

<!--- [ADDITIONAL_READING] Luca Consoli, Ronald Tinnevelt — «Waarheid en democratie»

[NO_PDF] -->
1. [Brotherton Rob](https://barnard.edu/profiles/rob-brotherton) — Bad News. Why We Fall for Fake News (Bloomsbury, 2020).epub
<!--- [INFO] Похоже, есть перекос в сторону освещения с либеральной точки зрения -->
1. [Козловский Борислав Михайлович](https://web.archive.org/web/20200920203553/https://www.rusrep.ru/authors/kozlovskii/) — Максимальный репост. Как соцсети заставляют нас верить фейковым новостям (Альпина Паблишер, 2018).pdf

<a id="Учебные-пособия-для-журналистов-по-противодействию-fake-news"></a>
### Учебные пособия для журналистов по противодействию fake news

<!--- [ACADEMIC_DEGREE] Julie Posetti holds a PhD from the University of Wollongong in Australia. Her dissertation focused on the intersecting themes of journalistic source protection, privacy, media freedom and digital rights — https://www.icfj.org/about/profiles/julie-posetti-phd .
«Cherilyn Ireton leads the World Editors Forum, the community for professional editors within the World Association of Newspapers and News Publishers (WAN-IFRA)» — https://en.unesco.org/world-press-freedom-day-2018/cherilyn-ireton . Сведений об академических званиях Аиртон не нашёл.

[BOOK_SCEDRECO] Внешние рецензенты — Ильва Родни-Гумед, «PhD from the School of Oriental and African Studies (SOAS), London University as well as an MA degree in Politics from the University of Witwatersrand in South Africa and an MA in Journalism from Cardiff University in the U.K» — https://www.uj.ac.za/contact/Pages/Prof-Ylva-Rodny-Gumede.aspx ; Басиоуни Амада, «Ph.D.,Cairo University, Faculty of Mass Communication» — https://www.qu.edu.qa/file_source/qu/colleges/cas/faculty%20and%20staff/Mass%20Communications/documents/Dr._Basyouni_Hamada_CV_Jan_2017.pdf#page=4 ; Джейсон Харсин, «Northwestern University (PhD, Communication Studies) and University of Illinois (MA, Communication Studies)» — https://aup.academia.edu/JaysonHarsin 

[BOOK_SERIES] Серия ЮНЕСКО по журналистскому образованию
-->
1. Аиртон Шерилин, [Позетти Джули](https://www.icfj.org/about/profiles/julie-posetti-phd) (под редакцией) — Журналистика, «фейковые новости» и дезинформация (ЮНЕСКО, 2019).pdf
<!--- [ADDITIONAL_READING] Jonathan M. Ladd — Why Americans Hate the Media and How It Matters -->
1. [Распопова Светлана Сергеевна](http://mgup.ru/article/799), [Богдан Елена Николаевна](http://www.dslib.net/author/bogdan.html) — Фейковые новости. Информационная мистификация (Аспект Пресс, 2018).pdf

<a id="Фактчекинг"></a>
### Фактчекинг

<a id="Практический-фактчекинг"></a>
#### Практический фактчекинг

<!--- [INFO] «Детектор мифов» — сайт с явно антикремлёвской риторикой — https://www.mythdetector.ge/ru . Конкретно в «Путеводителе по медиаграмотности» таковой вроде бы нет, почему считаю, что допустима категория «R». -->
1. [Гелава Софо](https://en.ejo.ch/author/sopho-gelava), [Курдадзе Дали](https://www.politifact.com/staff/dali-kurdadze/) — Путеводитель по медиаграмотности. Как бороться с манипуляциями и ложной информацией (Детектор мифов, 2018).pdf

<a id="Этичная-журналистика"></a>
## Этичная журналистика

<!--- [Is/Mono]

[ACADEMIC_DEGREE] [University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School, CV](https://www.law.upenn.edu/live/files/2352-sephen-wardoregon-bio) — «Ward has a PhD in philosophy from the University of Waterloo, Ontario. His research interests include history of journalism ethics, ethical theory, global media ethics and science journalism.»

[NO_SCEDRECO]

[REVIEW_CHECK] 2021-8-24

[POSITIVE_OR_NEUTRAL_REVIEW] João Miranda, Universidade de Coimbra, [RCL — Revista de Comunicação e Linguagens](https://rcl.fcsh.unl.pt/index.php/rcl/article/download/47/44) — «Por sua vez, Ethical Journalism in a Populist Age (2019) não pode ser lido de forma isolada. Este trabalho de Stephen Ward insere-se num quadro de reflexão que o autor vem desenvolvendo sobre a necessidade de reequacionar os fundamentos éticos do exercício do jornalismo», «or seu lado, Ward (p. 10) desenvolve aprofundadamente as bases do que considera ser o imperativo de se repensar o papel do jornalismo na sociedade, empenhando-se na garantia e cumprimento dos princípios democráticos.»

[REVIEW_NO_ACCESS] Nick Richardson, [Australian Journalism Review](https://search.informit.org/doi/pdf/10.3316/informit.071308399631583)

[AUTHOR_PROJECT] [Center for Journalism Ethics](https://ethics.journalism.wisc.edu/about/) in University of Wisconsin-Madison — «The mission of the Center for Journalism Ethics is to encourage the highest standards in journalism ethics worldwide.»
 -->
1. Ward Stephen J. A. — Ethical Journalism in a Populist Age: The Democratically Engaged Journalist (Rowman & Littlefield, 2019).pdf

<a id="Любовь"></a>
# Любовь

<!--- [ACADEMIC_DEGREE] [California State University, CV](https://www.calstatela.edu/faculty/dr-pamela-regan) — «Ph.D. Psychology, Ph.D. Minor Statistics University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN»

[CRIM_POSSIBLE_BIAS] В подразделах «Types of Pursuit or Stalking Behavior» и «Cyberstalking: A Growing Problem» inrequited lovers демонизируются, в то время как love rejectors изображаются исключительно как жертвы.

[Is/Mono]

[POSITIVE_OR_NEUTRAL_REVIEW][REVIEW_RETELLING] Frances Brandau-Brown, Department of Speech Communication, Sam Houston State University, [Journal of Family Communication](https://sci-hub.se/10.1080/15267430709336672) — «Regan achievedher goal in a way friendly to both scholar and layperson. This interdisciplinarybook would be a valuable addition to any upper division course that explores rela-tionship development.»

[REVIEW_HIGH_POSITIVE] Hendrick Clyde, Texas Tech University, [Sex Roles](https://sci-hub.se/https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11199-009-9594-8) — «As a seasoned professional in the area, the book was an excellent review.», «My view is that the approach taken in the book is excellent.», «But I do so only because I think thebook is so good that it should be enjoyed not only byuniversity students, as advertised on the back cover, butalso by students at community colleges as well»

[ADDITIONAL_READING] Rowland S. Miller — «Intimate Relationships»

Susan S. Hendrick — «Understanding Close Relationships»

Melikşah Demir, Nebi Sümer — «Close Relationships and Happiness across Cultures»

Pamela Regan — «Close Relationships»

Diana Jackson-Dwyer — «Interpersonal Relationships»

[NO_SCEDRECO] -->
1. Regan Pamela C. — The Mating Game. A Primer on Love, Sex and Marriage (Sage Publications, 2017).pdf
<!--- [ACADEMIC_DEGREE] [The Department of Experimental Psychology at the University of Oxford, CV](https://www.psy.ox.ac.uk/team/robin-dunbar/@@files?tile=24118ad0a35048da9197578e555fdda1) — «1973: Ph.D. (Bristol): Psychology (Thesis: "Social Dynamics of Gelada Baboons”)»

[CRIM_BIBLIOGRAPHY_END]

[Is/Mass]

[FAIL_BIBLIOGRAPHY][BOOK_FILE_WITH_BIBLIOGRAPHY] «Dunbar Robin Yan McDonald — The Science of Love (Wiley, 2012).epub»

[NOTE] У меня имеется англоязычная версия книги «The Science of Love», тогда как [есть ещё](https://www.google.com/search?q=Dunbar+%22The+Science+of+love%22&tbm=bks) «The Science of Love and Betrayal»

[ADDITIONAL_READING] Данбар Робин — «Лабиринт случайных связей»

[NO_PDF][NO_SCEDRECO] -->
1. Данбар Робин Ян Макдональд — Наука любви и измены (Синдбад, 2016).fb2

<a id="Безответная-любовь"></a>
## Безответная любовь

<!--- [ACADEMIC_DEGREE] Baumeister, [Florida State University, CV](http://www.fsu.edu/cvdb/RBAUMEISTER.rtf) — «1978	Ph.D., Princeton University. Major: Psychology.»

[NO_ACADEMIC_DEGREE] Wotman, согласно книге — «doctoral candidate at Case Western Reserve University»

[NO_SCEDRECO]

[REVIEW_CHECK] 2021-6-31

[NO_REVIEW]

[Is/Mono]
 -->
1. Baumeister Roy F., Wotman Sara R. — Breaking Hearts꞉ The Two Sides of Unrequited Love (The Guilford Press, 1992).pdf

<a id="Биология-любви"></a>
## Биология любви

<!--- [ACADEMIC_DEGREE] «1975: Ph.D. University of Colorado, Boulder: Physical Anthropology: Human Evolution, Primatology, Human Sexual Behavior, Reproductive Strategies.» — https://anthro.rutgers.edu/downloads/faculty/184-fishervitae2005/file

[CRIM_SPEAKER] https://www.ted.com/speakers/helen_fisher

[FAIL_BIBLIOGRAPHY][BOOK_FILE_WITH_BIBLIOGRAPHY] «Fisher Helen — Why We Love꞉ The Nature and Chemistry of Romantic Love (Holt Paperbacks, 2005)»

[POSITIVE_OR_NEUTRAL_REVIEW][REVIEW_RETELLING] เยาวลักษณ์ สุวรรณแข, อ.ดร., คณะมนุษยศาสตร์และสังคมศาสตร์ มหาวิทยาลัยทักษิณ อาเภอเมือง จังหวัดสงขลา — https://so05.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/parichartjournal/article/download/42949/35541 — «หนังสือเล่มนี้เป็นหนังสือมีเนื้อหาเหมาะสมสาหรับผู้ที่อายุตั้งแต่ช่วงวัยรุ่นตอนกลางเป็นต้นไป โดยเฉพาะอย่างยิ่งผู้อ่านที่เป็นครูผู้สอนในระดับมัธยมและระดับอุดมศึกษา นักวิจัย นักการศึกษา นักจิตวิทยา นักสังคมศาสตร์ นักเขียน นักปรัชญา ศิลปิน นักวิชาการ ผู้ปกครองที่มีบุตรหลานอยู่ในช่วงวัยรุ่น», «ผู้อ่านที่ได้อ่านหนังสือเล่มนี้ไม่เพียงแต่จะได้อ่านหนังสือที่เต็มเปี่ยมไปด้วยข้อมูลที่น่าเชื่อถือเท่านั้นแต่ผู้อ่านจะได้รับความบันเทิงอย่างยิ่งไปในเวลาเดียวกัน และที่สาคัญได้เข้าใจเรื่องความรักแบบ โรแมนติกในมุมมองใหม่ๆ»

[ADDITIONAL_READING] Elke Denys, Lara Mandonx — «Awel… Liefde in de kno(o)»

Christian Maurer, Tony Milligan, Kamila Pacovská (edited by) — «Love and Its Objects: What Can We Care For?»

[NO_SCEDRECO] -->
1. Фишер Хелен — Почему мы любим꞉ Природа и химия романтической любви (Альпина нон-фикшн, 2013).pdf

<a id="Любовная-аддикция"></a>
## Любовная аддикция

<a id="NR-32"></a>
### NR

<a id="Паранаучный-бэкграунд-автора"></a>
#### Паранаучный бэкграунд автора

<!--- [ACADEMIC_DEGREE] [Personal site CV](http://itsallaboutlove.com/downloads/pdf/Press%20Kit/CV%20Brenda%20Schaeffer%20R.pdf) — «Licensed Psychologist, 1986; D.Min. in Spiritual Psychology: University of Creation Spirituality, 2000; Certified Addiction Specialist, American Academy of Health Care Providers in the Addictive Disorders, Specialty in Sexual Addiction, 1996»

[Ad/PS]

[AD_JUSTIFICATION] “Spiritual Psychology” — трансперсональная психология; D.Min — теологическая степень

[REVIEW_CHECK] 2021-3-29

[POSITIVE_OR_NEUTRAL_REVIEW][REVIEW_ONE_PAGE][REVIEW_RETELLING] Curtis Steele, [Transactional Analysis Journal](https://sci-hub.se/10.1177/036215370903900211) — «Schaeffer obviously knows this material inside and out. I would recommend this book to allTransactional Analysis Journal readers and to clients as well»

[ADDITIONAL_READING] Семке Валентин Яковлевич — Привязанность. Зависимость. Симбиоз

[NO_PDF] -->
1. Schaeffer Brenda — Is It Love or Is It Addiction？ (Hazelden Publishing, 2009).epub

<a id="Микромоменты-любви"></a>
## Микромоменты любви

<!--- [ACADEMIC_DEGREE] [University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill](https://unc.academia.edu/BarbaraFredrickson/CurriculumVitae), «1990 — Ph.D. in psychology, Stanford UniversityMinor in organizational behavior»

[CRIM_SPEAKER] https://ed.ted.com/on/MsjdksQK

[Is/Mass]

Deborah Gioia, University of Maryland, Baltimore, USA — [Qualitative Social Work: Research and Practice](https://sci-hub.se/10.1177/1473325015571211) — «There is a big message for social work nested in the words of Love 2.0.», «I am encouraged that a true understandingof love could be presented to students as a means to strengthen the relationshipsthat they have with their clients, co-workers, agencies and communities. Theywould learn the science behind the emotion and begin to open their hearts. Nexttime I will not miss this opportunity.»

Samantha Murphy, [Scientific American Mind](https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/mind-reviews-love-how-emotion-afftects-everything-we-feel/) — «In Love 2.0., she has us reimagine love as a series of micromoments in which any two people, even strangers, can click with each other.», «This leap, however, is not supported by the study and fails to bolster her argument. In fact, most of the evidence she uses to support her theory of love falls flat. She leans heavily on subjective reports of people who feel more connected with others after engaging in mental exercises such as meditation, rather than on more objective studies that measure brain activity associated with love.», «Fredrickson's strongest section is her exploration of how we can turn her insights into practice.», «Despite the book's flaws, Fredrickson's aim in broadening our view of the emotion is to spread the love. A worthy goal.»

[NO_SCEDRECO] -->
1. Fredrickson Barbara Lee — Love 2.0꞉ How Our Supreme Emotion Affects Everything We Think, Do, Feel, and Become (Hudson Street Press, 2013).pdf

<a id="Привязанность"></a>
## Привязанность

<!--- [PROFESSIONAL_DEGREE] [Creating Connections](http://www.creatingconnections.nl/sue-johnson1.html) — «EdD, she is a Professor of Clinical Psychology at the University of Ottawa

[CRIM_PSYCHOTHERAPY][CRIM_NO_REFS]

[Is/Mass]

[POSITIVE_OR_NEUTRAL_REVIEW] Lorrie Brubacher, M Ed., LMFT, Founder and Director of the Greensboro Charlotte Center for Emotionally Focused Therapy & Daniel Perlman, Ph.D, Professor of Human Development and Family Studies at the University of North Carolina at Greensboro — [The Family Psychologist](https://www.lbrubacher.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/Love_Sense-_Review_from_TFP.pdf) — «Love Sense is a compelling read, and a clinically relevant resource for couple and family psychologists to enhance their practice. It is also an excellent book to recommend to clients and is sure to have a positive impact on many lives. Johnson provides numerous scientific references that point to love as an attachment bond which innately increases confidence, resilience, physical and emotional health, and has the capacity to increase compassion and overcome enmity between diverse social and international groups, and ultimately to foster an empathic civilization.»

Traci P. Collins, NCC, doctoral student in counselor education at North Carolina State University, [The Professional Counselor](https://tpcjournal.nbcc.org/book-review-love-sense-the-revolutionary-new-science-of-romantic-relationships-by-dr-sue-johnson/) — «Laypersons can read scientific information in a digestible form and apply the new information in their relationships, a task that is made easy through the book’s experiment sections. Whether the reader is a professional or not, Love Sense provides new insight on what is so “vital to our existence” — love.»

[REVIEW_NO_ACCESS] Mark Mahemoff, [Psychotherapy in Australia](https://search.informit.org/doi/10.3316/INFORMIT.267709714672425)

[ADDITIONAL_READING] Сью Джонсон — «Обними меня крепче»

Purton, Campbell — «The Trouble with Psychotherapy: Counselling and Common Sense»

Judith Herman — «Trauma and Recovery»

Джон Боулби — «Привязанность»

Джон Боулби — «Создание и разрушение эмоциональных связей»

Małgorzata Kita — «O wyznawaniu miłości»

[NO_SCEDRECO] -->
1. Джонсон Сью М. — Чувство любви. Новый научный подход к романтическим отношениям (Манн, Иванов и Фербер, 2020).pdf

<a id="Сильная-любовь"></a>
## Сильная любовь

<!--- [PROFESSIONAL_DEGREE] [Personal site](https://www.franktallis.com/) — «Dr Frank Tallis is a writer and clinical psychologist. He has held lecturing posts in clinical psychology at the Institute of Psychiatry and neuroscience at King’s College London. He has published over 30 scientific papers in international journals and has written a textbook on cognitive and neuropsychological aspects of Obsessive Compulsive Disorder (OCD).»

[NOTE] Википедия утверждает — «he earned a doctorate in psychology», но не удалось найти других подтверждений наличия учёной степени у Таллиса

[N/ProM]

[CRIM_FREUD] Таллис неоднократно упоминает Фрейда, однако, по моему мнению, нельзя сказать, что он некритично относится к его учению: «Фрейд полагал, что внутри человека укрыт биологический механизм, напоминающий тот, что превращает вино в уксус. В последующие десятки лет его понимание природы психических заболеваний стало шире, и он отказался от этого взгляда.», «Это случилось сразу же после того, как, по убеждению многих, всплыл один из «довольно интересных моментов», который Брейер решил не упоминать. Надёжность документальных источников постоянно подвергается сомнению историками психотерапии»

[ADDITIONAL_READING] Богданович Лидия — «Записки психиатра»

Frank Tallis — «Love Sick»

Frank Tallis — «The Act of Living: What the Great Psychologists Can Teach Us About Finding Fulfillment»

[NO_REVIEW][NO_SOURCES] -->
1. Таллис Франк — Неизлечимые романтики. Истории людей, которые любили слишком сильно (АСТ, 2019).pdf

<a id="Социология-любви"></a>
## Социология любви

<!--- [CRIM_BESTSELLER] Согласно самой книге

[POSITIVE_OR_NEUTRAL_REVIEW][REVIEW_RETELLING] Orlando Arroyave Álvarez, Universidad de Antioquia, [Revista de Psicología Universidad de Antioquia](http://bibliotecadigital.udea.edu.co/dspace/bitstream/10495/8514/1/ArroyaveOrlando_2015_PorQu%C3%A9DueleAmor.pdf) — «Esta explicación social, cultural o histórica gene-ral, no excluye las particularidades de cada uno de los hombres y cada una de las mujeres, y cada una de las sociedades particulares bajo el marco de lo que denominamos modernidad.

Marina Subirats, [Revista Teknokultura](https://dialnet.unirioja.es/descarga/articulo/5372433.pdf) — «De aquí que el libro de Illouz sea unaexcelente guía para adentrarse en los vericuetos de la pasión moderna, para entender algunasde las situaciones nuevas que se nos plantean y que no tienen precedentes en las novelas delsiglo XIX.», «Illouz realiza una excelente descripción de tales mecanismos, de losrecovecos que los constituyen, de las trampas que comportan», «Buen libro el de Eva Illouz. Tal vez un tanto reiterativo en su argumentación, pero sólido ylúcido. Aunque no pretende darnos recetas para ser menos infelices, probablemente quien lolea comprenderá porque pasó lo que pasó»

יורם בילו, [Israeli Sociology](https://din-online.info/pdf/sc16-2.pdf#page=195) — «בספר זה חוזרת אווה אילוז ומפגינה את הדמיון הסוציולוגי ואת הברק האינטלקטואלי שאפיינו עבודות קודמות שלה, בהוסיפה את הטריטוריה הרומנטית – שאינה ורודה כלל – למפה התרבותית הקשורה לעצמי ולחיים החברתיים בעידן המודרני המאוח», «טיעוניה מוצגים באופן מושכל, חד ובהיר, וקוראים תיגר על "אמיתות קלאסיות" ועל הוגים מרכזיים במדעי החברה. אתגרים אלה עלולים גם לעורר ביקורת לא מעטה», «סוציולוגים שאמונים על מסד נתונים גדול וקשיח יזקפו גבה לנוכח השימוש הליברלי במגוון כה רחב של מקורות ראשוניים – ראיונות עומק, אתרי אינטרנט, וספרי עזרה עצמית – ללא 19 ומהמאה ה-18טורים פופולריים בעיתונים, רומנים מהמאה ה-התייחסות למתודולוגיית איסוף ולנתונים כמותיים», « פמיניסטיות עלולות להתאכזב מ"האשמת הקורבן», «. פסיכולוגים וביולוגים לא יאהבו מן הסתם את הטענה כי אופני ההסבר והלגיטימציה שהם מציעים לקשיים הכרוכים ביחסים רומנטיים הם חלק מן הבעיה, ולא הפתרון לה. ואולי יהיו גם מלומדים שיראו באתיקה שאילוז מבקשת להשיב אל היחסים הרגשיים והמיניים ביטוי לניאו-שמרנות», «מב  ומבסס  את  אווה  אילוז  כאחת  מן  הסוציולוגיות  התרבותיות  החשובות  והמעניינות כואבתבתקופתנו»

[REVIEW_BE_CAREFUL] Ivica Raguž, [Diacovensia: teološki prilozi](https://hrcak.srce.hr/file/128735) — «Ova pak studija ponajbolja je studija o poimanju ljubavi i muško-ženskih od-nosa današnjega vremena. Svatko tko se iole želi pozabaviti tim i sličnim pi-tanjima, ne će moći zaobići ovu izvrsnu studiju Eve Illouz.», «Moram priznati da većdugo nisam pročitao tako jednu svje-žu, duboku i lucidnu analizu današnjih muško-ženskih odnosa, i to od žene i sociologinje, koja se također naziva feministicom.», «Šteta što Illouz uopće ne spominje re-ligiju koja je imala veliku ulogu reguli-ranju ljubavi, muško-ženskih odnosa.»

[BE_CAREFUL_EXPLANATION] «Posve je razu-mljivo da će naš osvrt biti s teološkoga gledišta», «Da opet po-novimo temeljnu tezu knjige: nisu tomu muškarci krivi, nego današnje društvo koje je ljubav odvojilo od moralnosti, a mi bismo dodali, religije.», «Radi se o religiji koja je odnose ljuba-vi poimala ljubavlju prema Bogu: žena i muškarci su svoj identitet pronalazili u Bogu pa su imali nutarnju neovisnost i slobodu u ljubavi prema bližnjemu.», «Mi bismo rekli, potrebno je ponovno otkriti danas tako podcijenjeno i ismijavano religijsko»

[ADDITIONAL_READING] Manuel Castells, Marina Subirats — «Mujeres y hombres: ¿un amor imposible?»

Illouz Eva — «Oprah Winfrey and the Glamour of Misery: An Essay on Popular Culture»

Illouz Eva — «Saving the Modern Soul: Therapy, Emotions, and the Culture of Self-Help»

Illouz Eva — «Consuming the Romantic Utopia: Love and the Cultural Contradictions of Capitalism»

Illouz Eva — «Cold Intimacies: The Making of Emotional Capitalism»

Edgar Cabanas, Eva Illouz — «Happycratie: Comment l'industrie du bonheur a pris le contrôle de nos vies»
-->
1. Иллуз Ева — Почему любовь ранит？ Социологическое объяснение (Директмедиа Паблишинг, 2020).pdf

<a id="Философия-любви"></a>
## Философия любви

<!--- [ACADEMIC_DEGREE] «1966 Ph.D. Princeton University Thesis: Categories, Translation, and Linguistic Theory (P. Benacerraf, supervisor)». «Current Research Endeavours "Emotions, language, and Ideology in the light of the Dual Processing Hypothesis"», «“Love and Ideology”», «2011-12 President, Canadian Philosophical Association» — http://homes.chass.utoronto.ca/~sousa/CVFULL.pdf .

[POSITIVE_OR_NEUTRAL_REVIEW][REVIEW_RETELLING] Marion Breteau, Doctorante en anthropologie – Aix-Marseille Université – Laboratoire IDEMEC — https://journals.openedition.org/lectures/21224 — «En effet, bien que de Sousa précise par moments que son propos peut davantage concerner les sociétés occidentales, il y a une tendance, du début à la fin de l’ouvrage, à prendre pour général ce qui pourrait n’être que particulier, ce que le titre annonce d’ailleurs. Le Banquet de Platon, dans laquelle la relation de couple est prise en termes monogames, renvoie à un contexte historique précis, tout comme les références littéraires ou cinématographiques qui sont convoquées illustrent une culture particulièrement nord-américaine ou européenne.», «De même, réfléchir en termes d’évolution pourrait contrarier certains lecteurs, tout comme le fait de suggérer le polyamour comme la direction la plus favorable. Il faudrait en effet rappeler au fait que cela n’est pas envisageable dans toutes les sociétés, au moins idéalement, en tout cas dans les faits.», «C’est ce que l’ouvrage permet de rappeler et ce, grâce à la mise en dialogue des sciences naturelles avec les sciences sociales qui se voient elles-mêmes déconstruites, démarche et ambition initiales de Sousa qu’il réussit à conduire de manière admirable.»

Florian Cova, maître assistant en philosophie et psychologie au Centre Interfacultaire en Sciences Affectives de l’Université de Genève — https://laviedesidees.fr/Eloge-du-polyamour.html — «constitue une opportunité inespérée de se familiariser avec cette philosophie de l’amour. Et cela d’autant plus que le titre de l’ouvrage, L’Amour: Une très brève introduction, ne ment pas : le livre constitue une véritable introduction, destinée avant tout au grand public motivé plus qu’au spécialiste en philosophie.», «On n’est pas obligé de partager l’esthétisme de R. de Sousa en matière d’amour. On peut même se demander si ce n’est pas cet esthétisme qui guide son approche théorique dans le reste de l’ouvrage, contre son exigence même de neutralité axiologique. Il n’en reste pas moins qu’on tient là un ouvrage passionnant et accessible qui, en plus de fournir une excellente introduction à la philosophie de l’amour, forcera le lecteur à s’interroger sur ses idées reçues.»

[BOOK_OR_AUTHOR_OR_CONCEPT_CRITICISM] Emily J. García, studied at Princeton and is currently a Postulant for Holy Orders in the Episcopal Diocese of Massachusetts — «This book’s title is Love, but, as the reader discovers on the second page, it would better have been titled A Lover’s Love—or Eros. For instead of “canvassing all our uses of the word ‘love’”(2), de Sousa immediately narrows his topic to the kind of love “typically associated with intense sexual attraction”; he finds this kind closest to love as it “commonly understood”(3).», «Perhaps I can explain it partly by saying that a reader encounters Shakespeare’s plays and sonnets used as evidence just as much as she encounters contemporary philosophers; opera and love-story clichés are sprinkled throughout along with sociologic anecdotes.», «Unfortunately this rich array of thinking requires a frustrating buy-in from the reader. De Sousa’s style is frequently described in reviews as being “witty”and “urbane”—I would add to this, “arch.”», «So in order to benefit from de Sousa’s thought, the reader must submit himself to de Sousa’s words without skepticism.», «De Sousa doesn’t seem extremely careful about either. While other Very Short Introductions also lack numbered footnotes or endnotes—replaced by each chapter’s bibliography at the end of the book—de Sousa frequently leaves out any citation of the poems or plays he discusses.», «However, de Sousa—like any author—makes many choices in what is presented and what isn’t. The most obvious is his decision to narrow “ love” to “eros,” for which he explained only that it’s found more in art and is what most people think of as “love.” Couldn’t he have also mentioned that drawing such a distinction is a common move in philosophy, but not in other disciplines? Throughout this book, de Sousa opts for a wry rhetoric that elides his role, rather than showing the reader what it is to think philosophically about eros.», «If de Sousa were more transparent about his thought, it would be easier to excuse the almost exclusively Western voices and the dismissive mentions of non-Western and/or religious thought.», «These brief aides, combined with his arch and omniscient tone, suggest that such approaches have no place in a real discussion about passionate love.», «a book which contains so much Shakespeare and Plato can find no place for, say, St. Augustine or Kalidasa—authors with equally influential things to say about the strange experience of eros, limerence, and lust», «And—even more rare—this neat conceptual approach appeals just as much to the reader who is in love and the reader who is studying it.»

[ADDITIONAL_READING] Susan Wolf, Christopher Grau (editors) — «Understanding Love. Philosophy, Film and Fiction»

[NO_PDF][NO_SCEDRECO] -->
<!-- lint disable write-good -->
1. de Sousa Ronald — Love꞉ A Very Short Introduction (Oxford University Press, 2015).epub
<!-- lint enable write-good -->

<a id="Математика"></a>
# Математика

<a id="Манипуляции-с-числами"></a>
## Манипуляции с числами

<!--- [ACADEMIC_DEGREE] Yale University, [Office of Public Affairs & Communications](https://communications.yale.edu/poynter/charles-seife) — «Charles Seife, a professor of journalism at NYU’s Arthur L. Carter Journalism Institute, has been writing about physics and mathematics for more than two decades.»

[JOURNALISM_SCIENCE_DEGREE] «Before arriving at NYU, Seife was a writer for Science magazine and had been a U.S. correspondent for New Scientist. His writing has also appeared in The Economist, Scientific American, ProPublica, The Philadelphia Inquirer, Discover, Slate, Smithsonian, The Washington Post, The New York Times, and numerous other publications.»

[CRIM_SPEAKER] [Speakerpedia](https://speakerpedia.com/speakers/charles-seife)

[CRIM_BIBLIOGRAPHY_END]

[Ti/Mass]

[POSITIVE_OR_NEUTRAL_REVIEW][REVIEW_IN_MEDIA][REVIEW_RETELLING] Robert Schaefer, Research Engineer at MIT Haystack Observatory, [New York Journal of Books](https://www.nyjournalofbooks.com/book-review/proofiness-dark-arts-mathematical-deception) — «The examples of proofiness presented in this review are only a sampling of what may be found. This book is an important work that belongs on every thinking person’s bookshelf. Proofiness is also is an excellent resource for teachers seeking ideas for topical examples in critical thinking»

[REVIEW_ONE_PAGE] Jessica Strowbridge Cohen, Western Washington University Bellingham, WA, [The Mathematics Teacher](https://sci-hub.se/10.2307/20876949) — «Proofiness is written in an engaging style that is accessible to the mathemati cally inexperienced. However, it is suf ficiently detailed and accurate to satisfy readers with a mathematics background.», «I recommend Proofiness as a source of examples and connections for practicing teachers. Anyone interested in the use of mathematics in society will find this book illuminating.»

[BOOK_OR_AUTHOR_OR_CONCEPT_CRITICISM][REVIEW_SMASHER] David S. Mazel, Ph.D. from Georgia Tech in electrical engineering and is a practicing engineer in Washington, DC, [MAA Reviews](https://www.maa.org/press/maa-reviews/proofiness-the-dark-arts-of-mathematical-deception) — «“Did you know that 67% of all statistics are made up on the spot?” You probably see the joke. Mr. Seife would not get it.», «Joe McCarthy’s use of the number “205” in McCarthy’s false charges of communists in the government. Seife thinks people believed Senator McCarthy because McCarthy used a number, and not a noncommittal phrase.», «Cute. But so what?», «It is these examples, expressed light heartily, that Proofiness uses to tell us that Americans are so gullible as to believe anything with a number attached. If you agree with that, the rest of this book is simple commentary. Seife does use some serious examples to show where mathematics can be abused but again, I would ask, so what?», «It is these examples, expressed light heartily, that Proofiness uses to tell us that Americans are so gullible as to believe anything with a number attached. If you agree with that, the rest of this book is simple commentary. Seife does use some serious examples to show where mathematics can be abused but again, I would ask, so what?», «Seife turns to serious business when he discusses elections but his arguments are flawed. On elections, he seems to confuse mathematics with laws passed by a legislative body.», «Thus when the book discusses how better to run an election based on science, the author misses the point. The problem with elections is not the science, it is that the legal requirements are often difficult for non-lawyers to comprehend. But, once the legal setting is determined, the votes cast, the elections become not a matter of scientific debate, but of legal decisions», «The book does have some good points, for example when Seife shows the mess that non-mathematicians can make with equations.», «Would a non-scientist then benefit from this book? I doubt it. It would be better for a such a person to read a statistics text. After all, statistics never lie.»

[BOOK_SAME] Charles Seife — «Proofiness: The Dark Arts Of Mathematical Deception»

Charles Seife — «Hawking Hawking: The Selling of a Scientific Celebrity»

Rust Holger — «Fauler Zahlenzauber. Fiktionen über Fakten in Wirtschaft und Management»

[ADDITIONAL_READING] Seife Charles — «Virtual Unreality: The New Era of Digital Deception»

[NO_SCANNED_PDF][NO_SCEDRECO] -->
1. Seife Charles — Proofiness꞉ The Dark Arts of Mathematical Deception (Viking, 2010).epub

<a id="Математическая-медиаграмотность"></a>
## Математическая медиаграмотность

<!--- [ACADEMIC_DEGREE] [Personal site, CV](https://math.temple.edu/~paulos/pdf/curr-2016.pdf) — Ph. D. in mathematics, University of Wisconsin, Madison, 1974. Doctoral Dissertation: "Delta Closed Logics and the Interpolation Property"; 1974.

[POSITIVE_OR_NEUTRAL_REVIEW][REVIEW_RETELLING] Morton F. Arnsdorf, The University of Chicago, [Perspectives in Biology and Medicine](https://sci-hub.se/10.1353/pbm.1996.0017) — «This is a superb book for everyman (everywoman, too), including those with a fear of mathematics.», «"The Dyscalculia Syndrome" should be required reading for anyone who has a fear of statistics.», «For those of you who have reached the age where one reads obituaries, this essay is mandatory reading. In conclusion, this is a most interesting and original book. You should read it, your husband or 18ife and children should read it, your students should read it, and you should commend it to others. Mathematical naivete, the lot of the majority of Americans, is dangerous for the individual and for our society.»

[REVIEW_ONE_PAGE] Mark L. Mitchell, MD. Medical Center of Delaware, Newark, [JAMA](https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/article-abstract/389448) — «Overall, the book is a compendium of unusually sound advice, which, ifwidely read and understood, could improve a lot more for us than the way we read the newspaper.», «My complaints about the book may be unfair, since they are mostly prompted by features that permit it to be read and enjoyed by a wide audience.», «When the mathematics has been removed from some concepts, so that they may be easily read, there seems to be little left but the mention of a particular phenomenon or a branch of mathematics.», «Some of the material may appear familiar to readers of Professor Paulos previous books. In particular, the discussion of the number of links that exist between people in the introduction to section 2 is similar to the discussion of chance encounters in chapter 2 of Innumeracy.», «If there is a pervasive theme among the diverse topics that Paulos has ehosen, it is the value of rejecting superficial explanations of complex subjects. He gives us valuable, ii brief, explanations of simple tools that we can use to understand the "stories" presented to us every day in the newspaper, and he presents them in a readable and entertaining way.»

[REVIEW_ONE_PAGE][REVIEW_RETELLING] Karen Doyle Walton, Allentown College of Saint Francis de Sales, Center Valley, [The Mathematics Teacher](https://sci-hub.se/https://www.jstor.org/stable/27969549) — «His mission is ably accom plished through a book loosely modeled after a standard news paper», «This intelligent, articulate, fas cinating analysis of newspapers is a must for every high school library and mathematics teacher because it illustrates clearly that the daily newspaper is a rich source of examples and ideas for every mathematics classroom.»

[REVIEW_ONE_PAGE][REVIEW_RETELLING] Barbara Reynolds, Professor of Mathematics at Cardinal Stritch University, [MAA Reviews](https://www.maa.org/press/maa-reviews/a-mathematician-reads-the-newspaper) — «Paulos refers to the way that news story of O. J. Simpson overshadowed reports of Jimmy Carter’s peace mission to North Korea, events which I certainly remember as will many of my colleagues; but I doubt that any of my current students, whose average birthdate is at the dawn of the 21st century will grasp the context.», « You might not learn any deep new truths, but you will probably enjoy chucking about some old news stories. You will almost certainly pick up tomorrow’s newspaper with renewed expectations about being entertained even as you read the more serious first sections of the paper.»

[REVIEW_RETELLING] José Luis Calvo, [El Escéptico](https://www.escepticos.es/repositorio/elesceptico/articulos_pdf/ee_13/ee_13_un_matematico_lee_el_periodico.pdf) — «Por otra parte, como todo título de divulgación quese precie, es perfectamente accesible a cualquier pú-blico sin necesidad de ingentes conocimientos mate-máticos previos. Unamos a ello el que Paulos hace galade un estimable sentido del humor, algo que no está re-ñido con las matemáticas»

[BOOK_OR_AUTHOR_OR_CONCEPT_CRITICISM][REVIEW_SMASHER] Gina Kolata, reports on science and medicine for the New York Times, [Notices of the AMS](https://www.ams.org/notices/199603/comm-kolata.pdf) — «But I am not sure that Paulos succeeds withhis book. It is hard to know how illuminating hisexegesis will be for the mathematically naive, but I suspect that few will come away with the sort of insight that might enable them to read news stories more critically.», «I can, however, say with some confidence that readers of the Notices will already know all of the mathematics that Paulos presents and will learn little about newspapers and reporting from his book.», «I had very mixed reactions to A Mathematician Reads the Newspaper. Although it is a short book witha sprightly air that makes it seem inviting, I felt as though I was slogging through it. It never came alive because Paulos rarely gave fresh examples of newspaper stories that might have benefited from mathematical insights.», «The question I always want answered is, Should I read this book, or should I recommend it to a friend? To be honest, in the case of Paulos’s book, I have to say that the answer to both questions is no.», «For mathematicians, the discussion is unlikely to beof interest because they will already know everything that Paulos says. For nonmathematicians, Paulos frequently is understandable, but at times he jumps too quickly into technicalities.», «But how many general readers will be comfortable with Paulos’s explanation of non-linear dynamical systems as “mathematical spaces on which vector fields are defined”?», «To illustrate nonlinear dynamical systems,Paulos chooses to use the Laffer curve of the Rea-gan era. But he gives no insight into why onewould expect chaotic behavior in this economicmodel. A more pertinent example might havebeen climate models predicting global warm-ing. Paulos, however, never mentions that topic,even though he uses Lorentz’s butterfly effectto illustrate the sensitivity of nonlinear systems to initial conditions», «But I was disappointed. For example, the chapter called “More Dismal Math Scores for U.S. Students” could have discussed the difficulties of comparing test scores of American students to those of students in other countries. But instead the chapter is Pau-los’s plea for Americans to care more aboutmathematics and to recognize its importance intheir everyday lives.», «In fact, one of the striking features of A Math-ematician Reads the Newspaperis that almostnever is a single newspaper article referenced,no newspaper article is discussed in any detailor quoted from, and even when a paper is men-tioned, Paulos almost never gives the date of an article.», «Sometimes Paulos seems trapped by his for-mat, seemingly at a loss for something to sayabout his newspaper sections on such things asobituaries or society pages. I have to sympa-thize. Where, after all, is the mathematics inobits?», «Pau-los shows little sign of having undertaken eventhe most minimal search through Nexis or someother data base to find newspaper articles thatmight illustrate his points. He does not seem tounderstand much about newspaper writing, andhe does not seem to have taken care to make hismathematics comprehensible to the general pub-lic», «I wish more reporters would ask, as he suggests, whether conclusions were drawn from a valid study or a collection of anecdotes», «Others, however, struck me as off base. In par-ticular, I question his suggestion that reportersask, “What is known about the dynamics of thewhole system? Are they stable or do they seemsensitive to tiny perturbations?”», «Unfortunately, I do not think that A Mathe-matician Reads the Newspaper will help either those of us who are reporters or those of you who read the Notices to do a better job.»

Peter Hilton, Department of Mathematics, University of New England, Armidale, NSW, [The American Mathematical Monthly](https://sci-hub.se/10.1080/00029890.1996.12004752) — «Most of the articles are very good. Some are immensely important, such as the one discussing the popular aversion to numbers ('Iraqi Death Toll Unknown') and that discussing health hazards ('Ranking Health Risks: Experts and Laymen Differ'); it is no coincidence that the latter is the longest in the book.», «For the brevity of the articles is, in the reviewer's judgment, a serious barrier to their effectiveness. It is not easy for the reader to grasp the various points being made-and the points made are various and by no means confined to those to be expected of a critical mathematician-when they are made so succinctly.», «The problem of intelligibility is further complicated by the author's indulgence of his considerable wit. There are many anecdotes and diverting asides — but some of these come close to being irrelevant, and this is a serious matter in such concise presentations. The long charming footnote on p. 86 seems not to relate at all to the theme of the article.», «The quest for brevity and pithiness has also led the author, in some places, to fall below his own high standard of exposition. He breaks the Golden Rule of Pedagogy by asking the reader, in some places, to accept his authority without being offered any explanation.», «But no review of this worthy effort should end on a sour note. This book will bring a great deal of pleasure to many-as it did to the reviewer. It is full of fun, full of information, full of insights.»

[REVIEW_NO_ACCESS] Carl Metzgar, [Professional Safety](https://search.proquest.com/docview/1020127404?pq-origsite=gscholar&fromopenview=true)

Bryan Denham, [Journalism & Mass Communication Educator](https://search.proquest.com/openview/0fe9e1933186f7966c98e5f37569adf6)

[N/SMas]

[ADDITIONAL_READING] Паулос Джон Аллен — «Математическое невежество и его последствия»

Paulos John Allen — «A Mathematician Plays the Stock Market»

Paulos John Allen — «A Numerate Life. A Mathematician Explores the Vagaries of Life, His Own and Probably Yours»

Paulos John Allen — «I Think, Therefore I Laugh»

Paulos John Allen — «Irreligion. A Mathematician Explains Why the Arguments for God Just Don’t Add Up»

Paulos John Allen — «Innumeracy. Mathematical Illiteracy and Its Consequences»

Comap Inc. — «For All Practical Purposes. Mathematical Literacy in Today’s World»

Comap Inc. — «Mathematics: Modeling Our World»

Comap Inc. — «Principles and Practice of Mathematics»

Gina Bary Colata (edited by) — «The New York Times. Book of Mathematics»

A.K. Dewdney — «200% of Nothing: An Eye-Opening Tour through the Twists and Turns of Math Abuse and Innumeracy»

Gizem Karaali, Lily S. Khadjavi (edited by) — «Mathematics for Social Justice: Resources for the College Classroom»

Eric Gutstein — «Reading And Writing The World With Mathematics: Toward a Pedagogy for Social Justice»

Julio Zárate Pinto, María de las Mercedes Rodríguez Sánchez, Beatriz Graña Otero, José María Chamoso Sánchez — «Matemáticas desde la prensa»

Corbalán Yuste, Fernando — «Prensa, matemáticas y enseñanza»

Fernando Corbalán Yuste — La matemática aplicada a la vida cotidiana

Дуглас Хофштадтер — «Гёдель, Эшер, Бах: эта бесконечная гирлянда»

Carla Bazzanella, Rosa Pugliese, Erling Strudsholm — «Numeri per parlare. Da «quattro chiacchere» a «grazie mille»»

[CRIM_BIBLIOGRAPHY_END][CRIM_BIBLIOGRAPHY_SHORT]

[NO_SCANNED_PDF] В имеющемся в Интернете [PDF-файле книги](http://libgen.rs/book/index.php?md5=3B790F907CC88913A5B8E2DCB6D9026C) неполная библиография и отсутствует именной указатель.

[NO_SCEDRECO] -->
1. Paulos John Allen — A Mathematician Reads the Newspaper (Basic Books, 2013).epub

<a id="Медиа"></a>
# Медиа

<a id="Воздействие-СМИ"></a>
## Воздействие СМИ

1. [Брайант Дженнингс](https://web.archive.org/web/20121227163027/http://www.etsu.edu/cas/documents/JBryantBriefBioFebruary2011.pdf), Томпсон Сузан — Основы воздействия СМИ (Вильямс, 2004).pdf

<a id="Миф-об-объективности-либеральных-медиа"></a>
## Миф об объективности либеральных медиа

<a id="NR-33"></a>
### NR

<a id="Непрофессионализм-6"></a>
#### Непрофессионализм

<!--- [NOTE] Эдвардс работал в корпорациях в сфере продаж, управления и консультирования в вопросах управления; Кромвалл — океанограф. Требования к категории R соблюдены, но тематика политическая, почему данный источник по Кристинограду их книги считаются неавторитетными. 

[Edwards David](https://zcomm.org/author/davidedwards/), [Cromwell David](https://web.archive.org/web/20051027141915/http://www.noc.soton.ac.uk/JRD/SAT/pers/ddc.html)
-->
1. Edwards David, Cromwell David — Guardians of Power. The Myth of the Liberal Media (Pluto Press, 2006).pdf

<a id="Пропагандистский-блиц"></a>
## Пропагандистский блиц

<a id="NR-34"></a>
### NR

<a id="Непрофессионализм-7"></a>
#### Непрофессионализм

<!--- [NO_PDF] -->
1. Edwards David, Cromwell David — Propaganda Blitz. How the Corporate Media Distort Reality (Pluto Press, 2018).epub

<a id="Менеджмент"></a>
# Менеджмент

<a id="Бюрократия"></a>
## Бюрократия

<!--- [NO_SCEDRECO]

[POSITIVE_OR_NEUTRAL_REVIEW][REVIEW_RETELLING] Hiroaki Daimon, 博士後期課程 — https://ir.library.osaka-u.ac.jp/repo/ouka/all/70632/ksgj_002_149.pdf ;

[REVIEW_RETELLING] Pavel Hulec, Fakulta filozofická ZČU — https://dspace5.zcu.cz/bitstream/11025/15724/1/Hulec.pdf ;

Н. П. Кнэхт, кандидат философских наук — http://esgi-miet.ru/images/Stati20173/esgi3_15_2017.pdf#page=151 — «Кроме этого, Гребер полностью игнорирует, например, важное различие между государственной бюрократией и корпоративной. Между тем различение между бюрократическими практиками прослеживается с очевидностью.»

Гаазе Константин, старший научный сотрудник МВШСЭН — https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/razvedka-boem-na-podstupah-k-levoy-teorii-byurokratii-retsenziya-na-knigu-greber-d-2016-utopiya-pravil-o-tehnologiyah-gluposti-i-taynom/pdf

[REVIEW_RETELLING] Mark Gatenby, University of Southampton — https://sci-hub.se/10.1177/0170840615590746

Aris Komporozos-Athanasiou, King’s College London — https://sci-hub.se/10.1111/1468-4446.12166

[BOOK_OR_AUTHOR_OR_CONCEPT_CRITICISM][REVIEW_WRONG] Anastasia Piliavsky, University of Cambridge — https://sci-hub.se/10.1007/s10767-016-9246-2 — «Many of the book’s readers will no doubt share Graeber’s concern and be very interested in hisdiagnosis. What they may find less convincing is the therapy he prescribes», «Graeber can hope to wish bureaucracy away,but by swapping regulation for autonomy, free choice, and the primacy of individual judgment,he risks collusion with libertarians and the Right.»;

[REVIEW_ANSWER] Дэвид Гребер — https://sci-hub.se/https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10767-016-9248-0 — «Finally, I guess I will have to address the reviewer’s claim that as an advocate of free playand creativity I am opposed to all forms of rules and systematization of any kind. It seems alittle silly that I should have to prove I am not a lunatic. But apparently I must.», «since itis an absurd position that no one would actually hold, but as it happens I did write it», «The reviewer came up with a kind of fantasy version of what positions she imagined an anarchist would hold on bureaucracy, rules, etc», «So clearly, once the word “anarchist” is invoked, different standards are held to apply—especially so, if there is any evidence that a scholar so labeled is not just putting it on forrhetorical effect, but might be inclined to apply anarchist principles in practice, even if only invery limited contexts to a very limited degree. Suddenly, ordinary standards of evidence seemto fall by the wayside.» -->
1. Гребер Дэвид — Утопия правил. О технологиях, глупости и тайном обаянии бюрократии (Ад Маргинем Пресс, 2016).pdf

<a id="Бюрократия-в-госуправлении"></a>
### Бюрократия в госуправлении

<!--- [ACADEMIC_DEGREE] Доктор социологических наук

[BOOK_SCEDRECO] Рецензенты — доктор социологических наук и кандидат философских наук -->
1. [Воробьёв Владимир Павлович](https://dep_guisr.pnzgu.ru/page/3123) — Социология бюрократии. Классические теории. Учебное пособие (Пензенский государственный университет, 2017).pdf

<a id="Доказательный-менеджмент"></a>
## Доказательный менеджмент

<!--- [ACADEMIC_DEGREE] Саттон — PhD, University of Michigan — https://www.gsb.stanford.edu/faculty-research/faculty/robert-i-sutton

[ACADEMIC_DEGREE] Пфеффер — PhD in Business Administration (Organizational Behavior), Stanford University — https://www.gsb.stanford.edu/sites/default/files/faculty-cv/jeffrey-pfeffer/cv_april_2019.pdf

[CRIM_SPEAKER] http://www.topspeaker.ru/speakers/?ELEMENT_ID=11917

[POSITIVE_OR_NEUTRAL_REVIEW][REVIEW_ONE_PAGE] Howard White, International Initiative for Impact Evaluation — https://sci-hub.se/10.1080/19439342.2014.893640

[REVIEW_RETELLING] George Castellion, SSC Associates — https://sci-hub.se/10.1111/j.1540-5885.2007.00266_3.x
Brian Harney, PhD candidate, National University of Ireland, Galway — https://doras.dcu.ie/14938/1/IJM_29_1_Article7.pdf

[ADDITIONAL_READING] Aaron James — «Assholes: A Theory»

Gareth Morgan — Images of Organization

[NO_PDF][NO_SCEDRECO] -->
1. Pfeffer Jeffrey, [Sutton Robert](https://www.gsb.stanford.edu/faculty-research/faculty/robert-i-sutton) — Hard Facts. Dangerous Half-Truths And Total Nonsense. Profiting From Evidence-Based Management (Harvard Business Press, 2006).epub

<a id="Кибернетика-в-госуправлении"></a>
## Кибернетика в госуправлении

<a id="Неформат"></a>
### Неформат

<a id="Книга-для-крупных-производств"></a>
#### Книга для крупных производств

<!--- [INFO] Неформат. Книга подходит, скорее, для крупных предприятий/организаций.

[NO_SCANNED_PDF] -->
1. [Бир Стаффорд](https://sci-hub.se/10.1111/j.1475-3995.2006.00565.x) — Мозг фирмы (Едиториал УРСС, 2005).pdf

<a id="Мифы-о-менеджменте"></a>
## Мифы о менеджменте

<a id="Критика-литературы-об-успешном-бизнесе"></a>
### Критика литературы об успешном бизнесе

<!--- [ACADEMIC_DEGREE] MBA from the University of California, Los Angeles, in 1980; PhD from the Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania in 1990 — https://www.imd.org/faculty/professors/phil-rosenzweig/

[POSITIVE_OR_NEUTRAL_REVIEW][REVIEW_RETELLING] André Luís Faria Duarte, Especialista em Informática Educativa; mestrando em Gestão e Estratégia em Negócios pela UFRRJ e professor da UNIGRANRIO — http://periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/EspacoAcademico/article/download/8398/4948

[REVIEW_RETELLING] Roberto Rodrigues Ramos, Professor Efetivo e Coordenador do Curso de Administração da Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC Campus Cariri) — https://web.archive.org/web/20200725202435/https://portalseer.ufba.br/index.php/cgs/article/download/31599/pdf_41 — «e forma específica, a obra é recomendada para todos que buscam um exercício de leitura crítica, e que sentem a necessidade de questionar paradigmas, por acreditarem que para o conhecimento científico não existe fórmula mágica que resolva todos os problemas»

[REVIEW_RETELLING] Camelia Gradinaru, Al.I. Cuza University of Iași — https://www.metajournal.org/articles_pdf/505-509-recenzie-camelia-gradinaru-meta-6-tehno.pdf — «This is a book that may increase our chances of being (more) critical, (more) focused and, why not, (more) sceptical.»

[FAIL_BIBLIOGRAPHY][BOOK_FILE_WITH_BIBLIOGRAPHY] «Rozenzweig Phil — The Halo Effect… and the Eight Other Business Delusions That Deceive Managers (FreePress, 2007).pdf». В издании на русском от BestBusinessBooks 2008 года отсутствует библиография; издания 2019 от Бомбора в интернете не нашёл.

[NO_OCR][NO_SCEDRECO] -->
1. Розенцвейг Фил — Эффект ореола… и другие восемь иллюзий, вводящие менеджеров в заблуждение (BestBusinessBooks, 2008).pdf

<a id="Мифы-о-лидерстве"></a>
### Мифы о лидерстве

<!--- [ACADEMIC_DEGREE_EDITOR] Сергей Ростиславович Филонович, доктор физико-математических наук — https://www.hse.ru/org/persons/61291 . Профессор высшей школы бизнеса. Начал работать в НИУ ВШЭ в 1996.

[POSITIVE_OR_NEUTRAL_REVIEW] Joseph R. Bongiovi, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill — https://sci-hub.se/10.1111/peps.12246 — «In perhaps his most controversial recommendation, Pfeffer prescribes a move away from leader-dependent approaches altogether. Don't just try to fix leaders but fix the system.», «We already know, through decades of empirical evidence, that good leadership IS important and that we KNOW what those practices are.»
Leonardo Vils, Gustavo Viegas Rodrigues, Universidade Nove de Julho — https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/3312/331245312010.pdf

[REVIEW_RETELLING] Richard Joseph, Curtin University, Perth — https://sci-hub.se/10.1080/08109028.2017.1355151

[BOOK_OR_AUTHOR_OR_CONCEPT_CRITICISM][REVIEW_SMASHER] Nick Butler, Stockholm University; Sverre Spoelstra, Lund University — https://sci-hub.se/10.1177/1742715017697514 — «There is nothing remotely ‘evidence-based’ about these titbits, which read more like the random musings of a professorial blowhardthan a lab-coated technician controlling for variables. Pfeffer thus strays frequently into thesame territory he is supposed to be criticizing.», «Hetends to uncritically accept research that supports his argument while dismissing out of handany studies that point in a different direction.», « What’s more,he fails to acknowledge that many of the leadership scholars he criticizes also appeal tothe same model of hypothetico-deductive theory-testing; they too claim to have science ontheir side», «But nowhere in his book is there an invitationto think beyond the current state of affairs», «We understand why Pfeffer wants to harm leadership discourse. But we hope ourreview clarifies why Pfeffer’s book, despite its effort to fix organizations ‘one truth at a time’, equally deserves to be dismissed as bullshit»

Dennis Tourish, University of London — https://sci-hub.se/10.1177/1350508416640841 — «Pfeffer’s book offers no serious consideration of the systemic issues that institutionalize dysfunctional power relations in workplaces.», «Significant academic work on organizational democracy (e.g. Deetz, 1992) is ignored», «He seems unable to imagine a world in which the predatory capi-talism that is rampant in the United States could be any different, other than in a few exceptional organizations.», «It means that, overall, the level of theorization on offer is minimal.», «We need change. But books that criticize the status quo while suggesting that little can be done about it are poorly placed to show a way forward.»

[ADDITIONAL_READING] Шульц Дон, Шульц Хейди — «Брендология. Правда и вымыслы о брендинге»

Harvey A. Hornstein — «Brutal Bosses and Their Prey», «The haves and the have nots: the abuse of power and privilege in the workplace-and how to control it»

Дэвид Болховер — «Живые мертвецы. Шокирующая правда об офисной жизни»

Adrian Furnham — «Management Mumbo-Jumbo»

Adrian Furnham — «Management and Myths»

André Spicer — «Business Bullshit»

[NOTE] В имеющейся в Интернете PDF-версии книги от PRESSI (HERSON) отсутствует множество страниц: 12, 76, 98, 103, 118, 144, 161, 182, 185, 197, 211, 232

[NO_OCR] -->
1. Пфеффер Джеффри — Лидерство без вранья. Почему не стоит верить историям успеха (Альпина Паблишер, 2018).pdf

<a id="Управление-человеческими-ресурсами"></a>
## Управление человеческими ресурсами

<!--- [PROFESSIONAL_DEGREE] Согласно самой книге, сотрудник Сертифицированного института персонала и развития. Возглавлял отдел консультирования по вопросам человеческого развития в Coopers & Lybrand. Вероятно, проходит как профессионал.

[ACADEMIC_DEGREE_EDITOR] Мордовин Сергей Кириллович — доктор экономических наук, профессор — https://whoiswho.dp.ru/cart/person/137423

[POSITIVE_OR_NEUTRAL_REVIEW][REVIEW_RETELLING] Nayantara Padhi, Centre for Corporate Education — https://sci-hub.se/10.1177/097215091001100213 ; Niki Kyriakidou, Leeds Business School — https://sci-hub.se/https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/j.1468-2419.2009.00342.x 

[BOOK_SERIES] «Классика MBA»
-->
1. Армстронг Майкл — Практика управления человеческими ресурсами (Питер, 2009).pdf
<!--- [ACADEMIC_DEGREE] Флэннес PhD — https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/therapists/steven-w-flannes-oakland-ca/300713 . Левин — PMP, PgMP (2nd in the world) — https://www.routledge.com/authors/i32-ginger-levin , DPA, согласно книге.

[INFO] DPA, похоже, эквивалентно PhD — https://www.unipage.net/ru/degrees_academic

[NO_SCEDRECO][NO_REVIEW]
-->
1. [Флэннес Стивен](https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/therapists/steven-w-flannes-oakland-ca/300713), [Левин Джинджер](https://www.routledge.com/authors/i32-ginger-levin) — Навыки работы с людьми для менеджеров проектов (Технологии управления Спайдер, 2004).pdf

<a id="Учебники-по-менеджменту"></a>
## Учебники по менеджменту

<!--- [ACADEMIC_DEGREE] Мескон — PhD — «Mike completed his Ph.D. in human relations at New York University at age 23» — https://atlantajewishtimes.timesofisrael.com/obituary-michael-mescon/ ; про Альберта и Хедури не смог найти информацию

[ACADEMIC_DEGREE_EDITOR] Евенко Леонид Иванович — доктор экономических наук; заведующий кафедрой стратегии и развития бизнеса ИБДА РАНХиГС при Президенте РФ — http://www.rabe.ru/about/struktura/4693/

[BOOK_SUPPORT] Американская фирма «Арчер Дэниэл Мидленд»; Академия народного хозяйства при правительстве Российской Федерации; Высшая школа международного бизнеса.

[POSITIVE_OR_NEUTRAL_REVIEW][REVIEW_ONE_PAGE] Allen C. Bluedorn, University of Missouri, Columbia — https://sci-hub.se/https://www.jstor.org/stable/258325 — «The consensus about the book's strongest and weakest topic areas were difficult to interpret. The coverage of the external environment received a strong consensus as a strong topic area, as did the coverage of the internal environment. Strategic planning received a weaker consensus as a strong topic area.», «Comments about the supplementary resources were generally favorable. Both the instructor's manual and computerized test bank were described as "good," and one panelist indicated that students reacted favorably to the tie-in with In Search of Excellence.»

[BOOK_SERIES] Зарубежный экономический учебник

[NO_OCR] -->
1. Мескон Майкл Х., Альберт Майкл, Хедури Франклин — Основы менеджмента (Дело, 2002).pdf

<a id="NR-35"></a>
### NR

<a id="Истории-финансового-успеха-от-первого-лица-2"></a>
#### Истории финансового успеха от первого лица

<!--- [ACADEMIC_DEGREE] PhD, University of Chicago (also MBA) — https://business.vanderbilt.edu/bio/richard-daft/

[ACADEMIC_DEGREE_EDITOR] Мордовин Сергей Кириллович — доктор экономических наук, профессор — https://whoiswho.dp.ru/cart/person/137423

[NOTE] В книге приводятся многочисленные Истории финансового успеха от первого лица

[BOOK_SERIES] «Классика MBA»

[NO_REVIEW] -->
1. [Дафт Ричард](https://business.vanderbilt.edu/bio/richard-daft/) — Менеджмент (Питер, 2006).pdf

<a id="Ментальное-здоровье"></a>
# Ментальное здоровье

<!--- [ACADEMIC_DEGREE][ACADEMIC_DEGREE_EDITORS] Виттхен — «Trained in medicine and psychology at the University of Vienna, Austria, he received his PhD in Clinical Psychology in 1975 and his habilitation (Dr. phil.habil.) 1983 at the LMU in Munich.» — https://www.ecnp.eu/-/media/Files/ecnp/communication/talk-of-the-month/Wittchen/Wittchen%20short%20CV%20with%20photo%20Nov%20%202012.pdf ;

Касс — «M.D., Professor of Clinical Psychiatry» — https://www.psychoanalysis.columbia.edu/people/faculty/frederic-kass-md ;

Олдхэм — «MD from Baylor College of Medicine Houston, Texas» — https://www.bcm.edu/people-search/john-oldham-27831 ;

Пардес — «M.D., State University of New York-Downstate Medical Center» — https://sps.columbia.edu/faculty/herbert-pardes-md

[ADDITIONAL_READING] Francesco Schiavone, Cristina M. Thiebaud — «User Innovation in Healthcare. How Patients and Caregivers React Creatively to Illness»

[BOOK_SERIES] Гуманистическая психиатрия

[NO_REVIEW] -->
1. Виттхен Ганс-Ульрих (под редакцией) — Энциклопедия психического здоровья (Алетейа, 2006).pdf
<!--- [ACADEMIC_DEGREE] Граница — профессионал, но я не нашёл сведений о его учёном звании

[BOOK_SCEDRECO] В книге не указаны редакторы/рецензенты

[DUPLICATE_GI]

[ADDITIONAL_READING] M. T. Haslam — Psychiatry. Made Simple

[BOOK_SERIES] Библиотека Гутенберга

[NO_SCANNED_PDF] -->
1. [Граница Александр Станиславович](https://kpfu.ru/pec_print?p_id=41031) — Безумие ли. Как психиатры выставляют диагноз (АСТ, Аванта, 2018).fb2

<a id="Ментальные-расстройства"></a>
## Ментальные расстройства

<!--- [INFO] Варламова — выпускница медиафакультета ВШЭ; Зайниев — бизнес-аналитик музыкального сервиса Zvooq. Оба — не специалисты в тематике, но оставлено, поскольку научный редактор — психотерапевт, психиатр Павел Бесчастнов.

[ADDITIONAL_READING] Семке Валентин Яковлевич — Превентивная психиатрия

[DUPLICATE_GI]

[NOTE] Отчества
-->
1. [Варламова Дарья](https://elementy.ru/bookclub/author/5275332/darya_varlamova), [Зайниев Антон](https://elementy.ru/bookclub/author/5275325/anton_zayniev) — С ума сойти! Путеводитель по психическим расстройствам для жителя большого города (Альпина Паблишер, 2016).pdf

<a id="Малявин-Максим-Иванович"></a>
### Малявин Максим Иванович

<!--- [DUPLICATE_GI]

[INFO] Книги Малявина — научно-художественная литература

[Автор](https://tlt.ru/culture/izvestnyj-tolyattinskij-pisatel-psikhiatr-maksim-malyavin-provedet-publichnyj-priem/1965374/)

[ADDITIONAL_READING] Thomas J. Scheff — «Being Mentally Ill: A Sociological Theory»

Thomas J. Scheff — «What’s Love Got to Do with It?: Emotions and Relationships in Pop Songs»

[NO_PDF] -->
1. Малявин Максим Иванович — Психиатрию — народу! Доктору — коньяк! (Астрель, 2012).fb2
<!--- [DUPLICATE_GI]

[INFO] В “Психиатрии — народу!” и “Психиатрии для самоваров и чайников” многое повторяется -->
1. Малявин Максим Иванович — Психиатрия для самоваров и чайников (АСТ, 2018).pdf

<a id="Мифы-о-ментальном-здоровье"></a>
## Мифы о ментальном здоровье

<!--- [ACADEMIC_DEGREE] Arkowitz, [The University of Arizona, College of Science, Psychology](https://psychology.arizona.edu/users/hal-arkowitz) — «Ph.D. in Psychology, University of Pennsylvania, 1968»

Lilienfeld, [Emory|College of Arts and Sciences, Department of Psychology](https://secure.web.emory.edu/webcollege/staging/psychology/people/bios/lilienfeld-scott-o..html) — «his Ph.D. in Psychology (Clinical) from the University of Minnesota in 1990»

[POSITIVE_OR_NEUTRAL_REVIEW][REVIEW_ONE_PAGE] Gary Cooney, ST5 in General Adult Psychiatry, The Kershaw Unit, GartnavelRoyal Hospital, 1055 Great Western Road, Glasgow, [BJPsych Bulletin](https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/bjpsych-bulletin/article/facts-and-fictions-in-mental-health-by-hal-arkowitz-and-scott-o-lilienfeld-john-wiley-and-sons-inc-2017-1795-pb-288-pp-isbn-9781118311295/6A6A8E0F5599D9D197620BE244C4BBED) — «At times the book feels a little political, particularly in its service to psychological therapies; there is a sense that the authors feel a duty to redress the pharmaceutical dominance in mental health treatments. Though perhaps a worthy pursuit, this sits a little uneasily as a potential source of bias in a book that sets itself up on a truth-seeking mission.», «Nevertheless, the book is a steadying force in a world where we now take a rather relaxed attitude to accuracy. Where the truth is often obscured by a more marketable headline, it is important as professionals that we anchor ourselves as far as we can in the facts. Arkowitz and Lilienfeld are to be thanked for doing a lot of the hard work for us.»

[REVIEW_PERSONAL_COMMENTS] Не согласен с утверждением рецензента о психотерапии. В книге Арковица/Лилиенфельда психотерапия не рассматривается как лженаука, как бывает в книгах скептиков.

[REVIEW_ONE_PAGE] Katherine McKay, MD, Assistant Clinical Professor (Adjunct), Department of Psychiatry and Behavioural Neurosciences, McMaster University, [International Journal of Mental Health](https://sci-hub.se/10.1080/00207411.2018.1493648) — «This book is an interesting and straightforward read. The authors are very clear intheir intention and purpose of the book, and it does fulfill this for the reader. Theauthors’statement that this book could supplement the undergraduate or graduatelearner’s core reading is very accurate. I also think that it would be of interest to thepublic more broadly as it aims to dispel popular myths and its format of many, shortchapters holds the reader’s interest.»

Wojciech Sak, [Psychoterapia](http://psychoterapiaptp.pl/uploads/PT_4_2018/81RecenzjaSak_Psychoterapia_4_2018.pdf) — «Książka Arkowitza i Lilienfelda pozwala nadążyć za szybkim rozwojem psychologii, choć niestety czyni to w sposób dość chaotyczny, co jest jednak zrozumiałe, biorąc pod uwagę, jak powstała», «Publikacja jest warta polecenia każdemu, kto chciałby w szerokim przekroju przyjrzeć się współczesnym badaniom w obszarze zdrowia psychicznego. Tym bardziej że Arko-witz i Lilienfeld piszą w bardzo zajmujący i zwięzły sposób.», «Książka będzie przydatna dla psychologów i psychoterapeutów przy uaktualnianiu i poszerzaniu wiedzy, szczególnie w kwestiach, które mogli przypadkiem pominąć bądź poświęcić im mniej czasu, niż na to zasługują.»

[REVIEW_ONE_PAGE] Gerald P. Koocher, [PsycCRITIQUES](https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Gerald-Koocher-2/publication/320319756_Everything_You_Know_Is_Wrong_Almost_but_Not_Really/links/5b2ab309a6fdcc72db50795b/Everything-You-Know-Is-Wrong-Almost-but-Not-Really.pdf) — «Facts and Fictions in Mental Healthis an engaging and easy read aimed chiefly at a popularpress audience. The book could also prove interesting supplemental reading forundergraduate psychopathology courses or as a potential cautionary tale for practitioners.Although sprinkled with references to research and occasional suggested readings, the bookis not intended as heavy-duty scholarship», «Nonetheless, this book does an excellent job at offering easilydigestible consumer-oriented information that debunks many popular myths related tomental health.»

[Is/Mono]

[ADDITIONAL_READING] Scott O. Lilienfeld, John Ruscio, Steven Jay Lynn — Navigating the Mindfield: A Guide to Separating Science from Pseudoscience in Mental Health

David E. Engle, Hal Arkowitz — Ambivalence in Psychotherapy: Facilitating Readiness to Change

Thomas Gilovich — How We Know What Isn’t So: The Fallibility of Human Reason in Everyday Life

Kenneth S. Pope, Janet L. Sonne, Beverly Greene and Gerald P. Koocher — What Therapists Do Not Talk About and Why: Understanding Taboos That Hurt Us and Our Clients

[NO_SCEDRECO][NO_SCANNED_PDF] -->
1. Arkowitz Hal, Lilienfeld Scott O. — Facts and Fictions in Mental Health (Wiley Blackwell, 2017).pdf

<a id="Работа-психиатра"></a>
## Работа психиатра

<!--- [ACADEMIC_DEGREE] Граница — профессионал, но я не нашёл сведений о его учёном звании

[BOOK_SCEDRECO] В книге не указаны редакторы/рецензенты

[DUPLICATE_GI]

[ADDITIONAL_READING] M. T. Haslam — Psychiatry. Made Simple

[BOOK_SERIES] Библиотека Гутенберга 

[NO_SCANNED_PDF] -->
1. [Граница Александр Станиславович](https://kpfu.ru/pec_print?p_id=41031) — Безумие ли. Как психиатры выставляют диагноз (АСТ, Аванта, 2018).fb2

<a id="Мир-мiръ"></a>
# Мир (мiръ)

<!--- [ACADEMIC_DEGREE] 1974 PhD, Lund University, Sweden; Profesor Emérito de Sociología, Universidad de Cambridge — http://www.sociales.uba.ar/wp-content/blogs.dir/219/files/2018/11/Therborn-CV.pdf

[BOOK_SCEDRECO] Гавриленко Станислав Михайлович, кандидат философских наук — https://philos.msu.ru/node/140

[POSITIVE_OR_NEUTRAL_REVIEW] https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1397449/FULLTEXT01.pdf#page=24 . Других обзоров на английском и шведском не нашёл.

[BOOK_CRITICISM] https://sci-hub.se/10.1177/000169937702000106 — критика Терборна в журнале 1977 года

[CRIM] Представитель постмарксизма

[ADDITIONAL_READING] Thomas L. Friedman — «Thank You for Being Late: An Optimist’s Guide to Thriving in the Age of Accelerations»

[BOOK_SERIES] Социальная теория

[NO_OCR] -->
1. [Терборн Йоран](https://lnu.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1033662/FULLTEXT01.pdf) — Мир. Руководство для начинающих (Высшая школа экономики, 2015).djvu

<a id="Прогресс"></a>
## Прогресс

<a id="Оптимистичный-взгляд-на-прогресс"></a>
### Оптимистичный взгляд на прогресс

<a id="NR-36"></a>
#### NR

<a id="Критика-1"></a>
##### Критика

<!--- [INFO] Professor of International Health — прямым специалистом в теме не является. Не нашёл информацию об учёных званиях Улы Рослинга и Анны Рослинг Рённлунд.

[BOOK_CRITICISM] https://inthesetimes.com/article/new-optimists-bill-gates-steven-pinker-hans-rosling-world-health , https://quillette.com/2018/11/16/the-one-sided-worldview-of-hans-rosling/ , https://overpopulation-project.com/factfulness-a-more-accurate-title-for-this-new-book-would-have-been-selecting-facts-to-make-you-happy/ , https://medium.com/wedonthavetime/the-book-factfulness-is-criticised-for-taking-climate-change-too-lightly-6bdb12173ef5 . Возможно, научный консенсус таков, что категория книги должна быть «Ad». Положительные рецензии — https://sci-hub.se/10.1177/0170840618813918 , https://sci-hub.se/10.1002/emt.30490 .

[AUTHOR_PROJECT] Gapminder — https://www.gapminder.org/

[CRIM] Спикер — https://www.ted.com/speakers/hans_rosling

[BOOK_SUPPORT] Книжные проекты Дмитрия Зимина

[NO_OCR] -->
1. [Рослинг Ханс](https://nyheter.ki.se/media/156/download) — [Фактологичность. Десять причин наших заблуждений о мире — и почему всё не так плохо, как кажется](https://medium.com/wedonthavetime/the-book-factfulness-is-criticised-for-taking-climate-change-too-lightly-6bdb12173ef5) (АСТ, Corpus, 2020).epub

<a id="Написание-текстов"></a>
# Написание текстов

<a id="Корректура"></a>
## Корректура

<!--- [INFO] Похоже, что профессионал, но не учёный

[NO_PDF] -->
1. [Рисс Олег Вадимович](https://books.google.ru/books?id=0BZfDwAAQBAJ&pg=PT57) — Семь раз проверь… Опыт путеводителя по опечаткам и ошибкам в тексте (ЛКИ, 2010).fb2

<a id="Написание-нехудожественных-текстов"></a>
## Написание нехудожественных текстов

<!--- [NOTE] О Харте и фон дер Остене лишь упоминания на сайте университета Ферриса, о Райнкинге о того нет

[BOOK_SERIES] Уроки для начинающих авторов

[INFO] Серия «Уроки для начинающих авторов»

[NO_SOURCES] -->
1. Райнкинг Джеймс Э., [Харт Эндрю У.](https://www.ferris.edu/HTMLS/alumni/Emeriti/newsletter/pdfs-docs/newsletter.2012.08a.pdf#page=7), [фон дер Остен Роберт](https://www.ferris.edu/HTMLS/academics/honored/faculty/index.htm) — Композиция. Шестнадцать уроков для начинающих авторов (Флинта, Наука, 2009).pdf

<a id="NR-37"></a>
### NR

<a id="Непрофессионализм-8"></a>
#### Непрофессионализм

<!--- [NOTE] Из самой книги: «На её тренингах «Правила работы со СМИ» и «Успех в социальных медиа» учатся топ-менеджеры и пиар-специалисты. Категория «Ad», несмотря на то, что была выпускающим редактором «Коммерсанта» — https://www.kommersant.ru/authors/211 . -->
1. Соломатина Ольга Александровна — Писать легко. Как сочинять тексты, не дожидаясь вдохновения (Манн, Иванов и Фербер, 2014).pdf

<a id="Работа-над-стилем-нехудожественных-текстов"></a>
### Работа над стилем нехудожественных текстов

<!--- [INFO] Серия «Уроки для начинающих авторов» -->
1. [Уильямс Джозеф](https://news.uchicago.edu/story/joseph-m-williams-professor-emeritus-english-and-linguistics-1933-2008) — Стиль. Десять уроков для начинающих авторов (Флинта, Наука, 2003).djvu

<a id="Наука"></a>
# Наука

<a id="Биографии-учёных"></a>
## Биографии учёных

<a id="Социальные-биографии-героев-злодеев-и-конформистов-советской-и-российской-науки"></a>
### Социальные биографии героев, злодеев и конформистов советской и российской науки

<!--- [ACADEMIC_DEGREE] «В 1951 г. окончил биологический факультет МГУ по кафедре Биохимии животных.», «В 1960 г. перешел на работу в МГУ в качестве сначала ст.н.с., а затем доцента кафедры биофизики физического факультета. В 1963 г., по приглашению академика Г.М.Франка, наряду с работой в МГУ стал руководителем лаборатории физической биохимии в Институте биофизики в Пущино.» — http://biophys.phys.msu.ru/index.php/ru/sotrudniki/22-sotrudniki-kafedry/103-shnol-simon-elevich

[DUPLICATE_GI]

[BOOK_SERIES] Наука в СССР. Через тернии к звездам

[NO_SOURCES][NO_SCEDRECO] -->
1. Шноль Симон Эльевич — Герои, злодеи, конформисты отечественной науки (URSS, Либроком, 2010).djvu

<a id="Тесла-Никола"></a>
### Тесла Никола

<!--- [BOOK_SERIES] Жизнь замечательных людей -->

1. [Матонин Евгений Витальевич](https://gvardiya.ru/authors/matonin-evgeniy-vitalevich) — Никола Тесла (Молодая гвардия, 2014).pdf
1. [Ржонсницкий Борис Николаевич](http://nlr.ru/nlr_history/persons/info.php?id=2331) — Никола Тесла (Молодая гвардия, 1959).pdf

<a id="Влиятельные-интересы-в-науке"></a>
## Влиятельные интересы в науке

<a id="Наука-на-службе-у-пиара"></a>
### Наука на службе у пиара

<a id="NR-38"></a>
#### NR

<a id="ВИЧ-диссидентство-и-антисемитизм"></a>
##### ВИЧ-диссидентство и антисемитизм

<!--- [BOOK_CITATIONS] ВИЧ-диссидентстские фразы — «Профессор Дузберг шаг за шагом показывает, как создавалась легенда о том, что маленький ретровирус является источником больших несчастий, за которые, на самом деле несут ответственность вполне определённые люди.», «Но как объяснить, что пол-Африки болеет СПИДОМ, то есть имеет иммунодефицит? А очень просто: Африка не имеет своего сельского хозяйства, это мировой иждивенец. Они не сеют и не пашут, а только едят и размножаются.», «Интересный факт, профессор Дузберг подчёркивает, что последовательное ухудшение здоровья людей с иммунодефицитом (так будет говорить правильней), а не СПИДОМ, вызывается началом приёма лекарств, предназначенных, именно, для его лечения, которые, в частности, основное лекарство — «АЗТ», являются чрезвычайно токсическими для организма человека.», «Книга заканчивается тем, что они вместе с другом, как дипломированное врачи, начинают излечивать больных СПИДом и что? — Правильно, их арестовывает полиция, и у них отбирают медицинские лицензии. Почему? — Вам что, ещё не понятно, что американское здравоохранение — это на самом деле болезнеохранение? Потому, что на здоровом человеке денег не сделаешь.», «Единственный шанс спасения у больных Иммунодефицитом (а не СПИДОМ, которого нет) — это бежать от современной медицины в далёкие сельские местности, очистить свой организм и полностью вылечиться.»

Антисемитские выражения — «Как вы прекрасно, надеюсь, знаете, ключ к пониманию того, что собой представляют псевдонауки психология и психиатрия находится в статистике того, люди каких национальностей составляют эти профессии. Оказывается, что в США 99 % психологов и психиатров составляют люди еврейской национальности. В других странах картина тоже мало чем отличается. Поэтому ключ к пониманию самого психоанализа состоит в том, что психоанализ — это повод для еврейского психолога и психиатра проникнуть и выведать ваши личные мотивы, а затем продать тем, кто может извлечь из этого пользу», «Идея «пресс-релизов» была внедрена ещё одним евреем — Ivy Lee.»

[INFO] Вера в теории заговора, антисемитизм — https://thedoctorwithin.com/blog/2009/10/21/doors-of-perception/ ;

[NOTE] Антивакцинатор — https://thedoctorwithin.com/chapters/ -->
1. [О’Ши Тим](http://www.positivehealth.com/author/dr-tim-o-shea) — Врата восприятия. Почему американцы верят всему, чему угодно (Self-publishing, 2009).fb2

<a id="Проплаченная-наука"></a>
### Проплаченная наука

<!--- [N/QP]

[PROFESSIONAL_DEGREE] Rampton, [Wikipedia](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sheldon_Rampton#Career) — «Upon graduation in 1982, Rampton worked as a newspaper reporter before becoming a peace activist. During the 1980s and 1990s, he worked closely with the Wisconsin Coordinating Council on Nicaragua (WCCN), which opposed the Reagan administration's military interventions in Central America and works to promote economic development, human rights, and mutual friendship between the people of the United States and Nicaragua. At WCCN, Rampton helped establish the Nicaraguan Credit Alternatives Fund (NICA Fund) in 1992, which channels loans from US investors to support microcredit and other "alternative credit" programs in Nicaragua.», «In 1995, Rampton teamed with John Stauber as co-editors of PR Watch, a publication of the Center for Media and Democracy (CMD).», «Rampton is also a contributor to the Wikipedia open content project, and was the person who coined the name "Wikimedia" which later became the name of the foundation that manages Wikipedia and its sister projects. Inspired by Wikipedia's collaborative writing model, Rampton founded Disinfopedia (now known as SourceWatch), another CMD project, to complement his PR Watch work to expose what Rampton perceives as deceptive and misleading public relations campaigns.», «After leaving the Center for Media and Democracy in 2009, Rampton became a website developer, joining an open government initiative led by New York State Senate chief information officer Andrew Hoppin. In 2010, Hoppin and Rampton co-founded NuCivic, an open source software company, which they sold in December 2014 to GovDelivery, a software services company now known as Granicus. Rampton currently works as a software engineer at Granicus.»

[PROFESSIONAL_DEGREE] Stauber, [Wikipedia](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Stauber) — «Stauber is the founder and former executive director of the Center for Media and Democracy, which sponsors PR Watch and SourceWatch. Since the 1960s, he has worked with public interest, consumer, family farm, environmental and community organizations at the local, state and national level. He edits and writes for the Center's quarterly newsmagazine, PR Watch. He is also a member of the Liberty Tree Board of Advisers.»

[MEDIA_CHECK] [Media Bias/Fact Check](https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/center-for-media-and-democracy/) — «Overall, we rate the Center for Media and Democracy Left Biased based on editorial positions that always favor the progressive left. We also rate them High for factual reporting due to proper sourcing and a clean fact check record. (8/15/2017) Updated (D. Van Zandt 01/25/2021)»

[CRIM_FINANCING] [Influence Watch](https://www.influencewatch.org/non-profit/center-for-media-and-democracy/) — «As Center for Media and Democracy’s profile has risen in recent years, the group has faced criticism for its hypocrisy regarding donor disclosure. While CMD lists a selection of the foundations which fund it, the group also takes substantial money from anonymous contributors through donor-advised funds—in other contexts decried by CMD as “dark money.” In 2011, CMD received over 60 percent of its revenue from a single donor-advised fund.»

[CRIM_GMO] Седьмая глава книги “Attack of the Killer Potatoes” повествует о травле Арпаде Пуштаи. Пуштаи, согласно этой главе, говорил не о том, что ГМО вредны, а о том, что нужны дополнительные исследования. Ставлю кримаркер, но не снижаю категорию.

[REVIEW_CHECK] 2022-1-19

[POSITIVE_OR_NEUTRAL_REVIEW][REVIEW_RETELLING] Rachel Massey, [Journal of Public Health Policy](https://sci-hub.se/10.2307/3343233) — «Rampton and Stauber’s storiesaddup to a virtualencyclopediaof thetricksin thePRtrade.Theirbookis anessentialguideto whatwe areup againstas we workto understand,andtell, the truth.»

Arnd Juergensen, University of Toronto, [Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society](https://sci-hub.se/10.1177/027046760102100511) — «If the book were to be faulted for anything at all, it would be for the fact that it lacks a broader sociological analysis of the context within which the public relations industry functions. This criticism, however, would be somewhat unfair, because the purpose of the book is merely to expose the nature of the industry and the role it plays in modern society, a job that it does admirably well.», «Although there is nothing wrong with these suggestions in and of themselves, they raise the question of whether they are a sufficient answer to the problem. To answer this question a broader sociological analysis is necessary, and I would suggest that such an analysis might make these suggestion appear rather futile.»

Paul W. Thayer, North Carolina State University, [Personnel Psychology](https://sci-hub.se/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2002.tb00119.x) — «Not surprisingly, the book is wellwritten and carries the reader along quite well.», «It gives examples of papers written for fees and submitted to scientific journals, as well as letters signed by scientists that are sent to journals, newspapers and magazines to condition the audience to certain views. The authors imply that such practices are widespread. The treatment here is a little one sided. On the other hand, it is worth noting that there seems to be a strong publication bias in some areas», «This is a stimulating book. If you are interested in the issues described, or any of the controversies listed in the third paragraph, I recommend it to you. It is clearlypartisan, but the authors are quite candid in describing their bias. Further, they are critical of media representatives who do not look beyond press and video releases in developing a story.», «Unfortunately, the authors don’t seem to think highly of psychology and psychiatry, relegating them to belief systems, rather than science. They seem unaware that there is, indeed, a science and the use of scientificmethods that bring greater objectivity to bear», «They also fail to impress me when they rail against counter tactics used by individuals and corporations to get their point across. For example, they object strenuously to preparing questions and answers in advance and avoiding answeringreporters’ questions by “bridging techniques,” such as, “Here’s a tougher question.. .” Or “I’ve heard that, but the real focus should be on.. .” Having been misquoted, and had my statements taken out of context or distorted by a reporter determined to tell the story his or her way, rather than impartially,I don’t blame anyone who uses such counterploys.», «The authors fail to recognize that any scientist is being placed in a different world with different rules. The adversarial nature of our courts places restraints on experts that science does not. The authors need to understand the differingworlds of scienceand our court system if they want to persuade us that we are hired guns when we testify.», «Whether we work in the public or private sector, our organization may be confronted with issues that concern the public. This book gave me a better understanding of some of the tactics and problems involved, and I’m glad I read it»

Charlie Cray, [The Multinational Monitor](https://multinationalmonitor.org/mm2001/01april/book.html) — «Stauber and Rampton are best when they track the PR industry's methods back in history.», «Perhaps more than anything else, the overwhelming evidence provided in Trust Us, We're Experts! of the far-reaching role of public relations in regulatory policy decisions reveals the deeply cynical view that corporations have of modern democracy.», «Thanks in part to Stauber and Rampton, activists and even occasionally the media are beginning to pay attention to the men and women behind the curtain the public opinion manipulators who prop up the hired experts who speak publicly on behalf of their clients.», «The book's final chapter gives good suggestions on how to recognize propaganda, follow the money behind scientific research and demand full disclosure. Although not an organizing handbook, this book is an essential tool in the struggle to democratize crucial decision-making processes. Read it if you are having trouble believing what the experts say.»

Michael Ryan, University of Houston, [Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly](https://sci-hub.se/10.1177/107769900207900213) — «WARNING: THIS BOOK MAY BE HAZARDOUSTOYOUR HEALTH. Well, okay. That may be a little over the top, but not by much.», «The depression is likely to deepen as teachers discover how devious-and successful-the corporate disinformation campaigns really are.», «This well-written, well-organizedbook», «Ramptonand Staubertry to arm citizens with tools they can use to fight back, and journalists will find many of these tools helpful.», «Reporters and editors should be able to do better after reading this book. The authors’ recommendations show how journalists committedto objectivereporting can be more effective and responsible. The book also is a good model for determined, thorough, important investigative journalism.», «The book is not perfect, of course. The authors get a tad carried away at times. They say that a universal scientific method is a myth, although the real objection is that the method is sometimes misused.», «But it is a terrific book. Read it. Have your students read it. You will be glad you did. Even as your blood pressure soars»

Sharon Beder, [Engineers Australia](https://www.herinst.org/sbeder/engineers/columns/probe16.html), “Faster Cars, Slower Kids” — «Rampton and Stauber's book includes other detailed case studies of industry attempts to prevent the regulation of hazardous substances such as asbestos, silica dust, tobacco and also case studies on industry efforts to manipulate scientific knowledge of the risks associated with genetically modified food and global warming.», «The book clearly demonstrates that it would be na•ve to uncritically accept what experts say without exploring who is paying them and considering what opposing experts have to say.»

[REVIEW_RETELLING] Ian Lea, Faculty of Applied Arts and Health Sciences, Seneca College, [The College Quarterly or of Seneca College](http://collegequarterly.ca/2004-vol07-num01-winter/reviews/lea.html) — «Rampton and Stauber show that often it is difficult to distinguish between authentic scientific investigation and a sales campaign; presently there is no test for credibility of public policy experts.»

[REVIEW_ORG] Annette Aguayo, [Southwest Research and Information Center](http://www.sric.org/voices/2001/v2n4/reviews/trustus.php) — «Trust Us exposes the truth about so-called experts, urging us to question not just authority, but experts who should really be working to protect us. Future journalists should read this, so they too can learn to question experts and not just take things at face value.»

[BOOK_OR_AUTHOR_OR_CONCEPT_CRITICISM][REVIEW_SMASHER] Ingrid Selene, Corporate Affairs Manager for Pharmacia, [Corporate Public Affairs](https://www.accpa.com.au/downloads/2003_1_Article9.pdf) — «Polemical writing such as you find in ‘Trust Us,We’re Experts!’ is written for people who want to have their views reinforced. It is unlikely that it is even read by, let alone persuades, those with a different point of view.», «On the surface, Rampton and Stauber take a very simplistic, dichotomous view of the world, there is black and white, good and bad, right and wrong. It is possibly due to this approach that they end up being both hypocritical and inconsistent.», «For example, the authors do not question or criticize non-government organisations (NGOs) for using the same communications techniques that corporations employ, and which they find so abhorrent. Similarly, they do not appear to have a problem with the advertising industry employing celebrities to convey a message while at the same time attacking the use of celebrities in PR. Even more hypocritical, however, is the fact that the authors themselves use and manipulate language, science and opinion leaders in the presentation of their arguments in precisely the same way that corporations do, and the authors find so unacceptable.», «Rampton and Stauber are clearly experts in the use of emotive and manipulative language. A couple of the more blatant examples include: • Using the term “thought control” when referring to PR campaigns (page 28); and • Describing the head of American Council on Science and Health as “principled” when referring to her stand against tobacco companies while attacking her for having taken a stance on other issues where she is more supportive of the corporate sector (page 228)», «But this does not stop them from also employing more insidious techniques such as attacks by insinuation. For example, they discuss the head of the US PR Society Ethics Committee, and the fact that he runs a personal business in providing media training services, in such a way as to imply that he is unethical, since a clear assumption of the book is that media training per se is unethical.», «Rampton and Stauber attack outright the use of both celebrities and scientists to present a message, and are critical of opinions being “bought”. It is therefore disappointing that they do not engage in a more thorough critique of the strategy of using third parties. There is no discussion of the ethics and responsibilities of the third parties themselves, nor of the circumstances where it may or may not be acceptable to use them. The only rationale offered for the strategy being wrong is that “these people might be influential”.», «There is similarly no critique of the role of the media in investigating issues, questioning the arguments and motives of spokespeople, and researchng the information provided to them by corporations. From reading this book you would think that the media are an insignificant, powerless player in the mass communication business», «The only history on PR per se is a reference to E. L. Bernays who the authors describe as the “father of PR”. Then for no apparent reason, other than the fact that Bernays was a nephew of Freud, we get a disconnected discussion of Freud.», «But the most disappointing aspect of ‘Trust Us, We’re the Experts!’ is that it does not further the important discussion and debate that those of us in the public affairs/PR field should be having. That is, the discussion as to ethical behaviour; what is ethical and what not, how do we seek to resolve difficult ethical issues, and how do we try and prevent non-ethical behaviour that besmirches all of us.», «It is perhaps unfair to expect this book to be something that the authors may not have intended. Nevertheless, it is hard to understand why Rampton and Stauber have not taken the opportunity to present an analysis that might advance changes to the very practices that they so vociferously attack»

[REVIEW_SMASHER][REVIEW_ORG] Rob Latham, former Public Affairs Director at the Independent Institute, [Independent Institute](https://www.independent.org/news/article.asp?id=385), “Institute Responds to “Trust Us, We’re Experts” Authors’” Fantasy — «In their flawed new book, Trust Us, We’re Experts, Sheldon Rampton and John Stauber erroneously accuse The Independent Institute of compromising its objectivity to benefit special interests.», «The information cited by Rampton and Stauber originated from the now well-known, clandestine smear campaign against the Institute by the Oracle Corporation, led by multibillionaire CEO, Larry Ellison. Oracle, Microsoft’s chief rival, is seeking competitive advantage via the protectionism of the government’s antitrust case.», «On the contrary, during the June 2, 1999 news conference for its Open Letter on Antitrust Protectionism, the Institute specified that it received 7–8% of that year’s funding from Microsoft—far lower than the 20% the authors erroneously report. The internal Institute documents cited by them contains incomplete and inaccurate accounting information.», «Being the recipients of funding from only left-liberal ideological advocacy foundations, Rampton and Stauber’s Center for Media and Democracy fails their own meaningless test for bias. In contrast, there is absolutely no evidence that any aspect of the Institute’s research has ever been affected one way or the other by whether Microsoft or anyone was or was not a supporter of The Independent Institute. Furthermore, there is no evidence that any of the Institute’s findings are incorrect.», «Rampton and Stauber’s rejection of science, objectivity, or even getting the facts right, in favor of “increased democracy and citizen participation” in the scientific process has dangerous implications, and speaks volumes of their own work as quack advocates of junk science.», «“To argue that what may count as true in the scientific community must first survive public opinion polls and voter approval is so wrongheaded that it has its own logical fallacy named after it: argumentum ad populum,” notes Theroux.», «Pioneering scientific findings that overturn long-cherished myths has seldom set well with partisans hell-bent on their own deeply flawed crusades, and such is again the case with Rampton and Stauber. I believe that they should immediately retract the errors pertaining to The Independent Institute in both their book and at future media appearances,” says Theroux. “Their own integrity is at stake here.”», «“Otherwise,” Theroux says, “we can only conclude that the title of their book is quite illuminating not about whom or what they are evaluating, but of the shoddy quality and untrustworthiness of their own highly questionable and, in fact, non-existent “expertise.”»

[CRIM_OFFENSIVE] «Pioneering scientific findings that overturn long-cherished myths has seldom set well with partisans hell-bent on their own deeply flawed crusades, and such is again the case with Rampton and Stauber», «“Otherwise,” Theroux says, “we can only conclude that the title of their book is quite illuminating not about whom or what they are evaluating, but of the shoddy quality and untrustworthiness of their own highly questionable and, in fact, non-existent “expertise.”»

[CRIM_FALLACIES] «“Rampton and Stauber have failed to separate out those, like ourselves, who are properly and honestly attacking corporate welfare in the U.S., and unwittingly or not, they end up being the defender of such policies,” says Institute president David J. Theroux.» — себя называют «правильными и честными»; «“To argue that what may count as true in the scientific community must first survive public opinion polls and voter approval is so wrongheaded that it has its own logical fallacy named after it: argumentum ad populum,” notes Theroux.» — чучело

[REVIEW_SELF-PUBLISHING] Peter M. Sandman, PhD, risk communication consultant, [personal site](https://www.psandman.com/colophon.htm) — «My job was to defend PR – which I didn’t do very well, because I basically agree with Rampton that companies often pay scientists to present a carefully selected and sculpted subset of the truth that suits their purposes.», «I have two problems with Rampton’s thesis, however. First, he seems to imagine that scientists who don’t work for corporations are entirely trustworthy. And second, he clearly thinks the sort of one-sided science he is complaining about works extraordinarily well to achieve evil corporate designs. Neither of these is so, I think. And understanding why they are not so leads to a very different vision of the role of experts in risk controversies.», «Which leads to my other disagreement with Sheldon Rampton. He is right that companies often hire mercenary experts to distort for them.», «But as his book demonstrates again and again, these expert distortions tend to get discovered. The result of this pattern of distortion is not a public that trusts corporate experts and corporate reassurances excessively. It is a public that distrusts them excessively. We are rightly convinced that companies are willing to try to mislead us; so we assume that they are trying to do so even when they tell us the truth.»

[REVIEW_PERSONAL_COMMENTS] Приведённый Сэндменом пример «Distortion from the true believers», по моему мнению, совсем не про “true believers”

[REVIEW_NO_ACCESS] Sharon Beder, [Science and Public Policy](https://academic.oup.com/spp/article-abstract/29/2/146/1637088), “Experts under scrutiny”

[REVIEW_NO_ACCESS] Gard Binney, [The Ecologist](https://go.gale.com/ps/anonymous?id=GALE|A74583534&issn=02613131)

[AUTHORS_PROJECTS] [The Center for Media and Democracy, PR Watch](https://prwatch.org/cmd) — «The Center for Media and Democracy (CMD) is a nationally recognized watchdog that leads in-depth, award-winning investigations into the corruption that undermines our democracy, environment, and economic prosperity.»

[SourceWatch](https://www.sourcewatch.org) — «We Track Corporations and PR Spin», «We provide well-documented information about corporate public relations (PR) campaigns, including corporate front groups, people who "front" corporate campaigns, and PR operations.»

-->
1. Rampton Sheldon, Stauber John Clyde — Trust Us, We’re Experts! How Industry Manipulates Science and Gambles with Your Future (Penguin Putnam, 2000).djvu

<a id="Торговцы-сомнениями"></a>
### Торговцы сомнениями

<!--- [ACADEMIC_DEGREE] Oreskes — Ph.D. 1990 Stanford University (Graduate Special Program: Geological Research and History of Science) — https://histsci.fas.harvard.edu/files/hos/files/oreskes_cv_aug_2020.pdf ; Conway — «Historian of science and technology; completed a Ph.D. from the University of Minnesota in 1998, with a dissertation on the development of aircraft landing aids» — https://www.erikmconway.com/

[POSITIVE_OR_NEUTRAL_REVIEW] Manuel Kaiser, Universität Zürich — https://www.hsozkult.de/publicationreview/id/reb-24176 — «Um ihre Kritik plausibilisieren zu können, zahlen Oreskes und Conway allerdings einen hohen Preis. Die „Normalwissenschaft“ erscheint bei ihnen durchweg als positive Folie, von der die Produktion von „Unwissen“ abgegrenzt wird.», «Natürlich mag angesichts der in dem Buch beschriebenen Täuschungen, die oft strafrechtlich relevant zu sein scheinen, die „reguläre“ Wissensproduktion und -zirkulation vergleichsweise reibungslos verlaufen sein. Doch die insgesamt unkritische Darstellung der „Normalwissenschaft“ provoziert nicht nur Nachfragen, sondern bietet auch Angriffsfläche für die kritisierten Akteure. Umso mehr als Oreskes und Conway selbst an anderer Stelle gezeigt haben, dass die „Normalwissenschaft“ im Kontext des Kalten Krieges keineswegs unabhängig war, sondern stark beeinflusst von den politischen und gesellschaftlichen Implikationen des globalen Systemkonflikts.», «Des Weiteren – und dies mag dem populären Format der Publikation geschuldet sein – irritieren die psychologisierenden Argumente, die Oreskes und Conway anführen, um die Arbeit von renommierten Wissenschaftlern für die Industrie zu erklären. Dass eine politische Einstellung wie ihr strikter Antikommunismus oder Neoliberalismus eine Ursache war, weshalb sie mit den jeweils betroffenen Industrien gegen staatliche Regulierungen vorgingen, vermag als These noch zu überzeugen.», «Diese Kritikpunkte ändern jedoch nichts daran, dass Oreskes und Conway ein (wissenschafts)politisch wichtiges Buch vorgelegt haben, das empirisch sauber belegte Argumente liefert, um den Produzenten und Vermarktern des Zweifels die Stirn bieten zu können.»

Luc Semal, Maître de conférences en Science politique au Muséum national d'histoire naturelle ( https://www.sciencespo.fr/psia/content/luc-semal.html ) — https://journals.openedition.org/developpementdurable/9346 — «Premièrement, les auteurs concentrent leur attention sur un aspect précis du climato-scepticisme, à savoir la production du doute aux États-Unis. Or il n’est pas assuré que tous les climato-scepticismes soient semblables, si bien qu’il faudrait désormais savoir si des logiques similaires sont à l’oe uvre en Europe.», «Deuxièmement, les auteurs font de l’opposition entre libre-marché et intervention publique le coe ur de leur explication. Les négateurs sont des fondamentalistes du marché, parce qu’ils pensent que le marché est le système le plus efficace pour produire, en cas de problème, des réponses sous la forme d’innovations ou de substitutions. En bref, il existe aussi des étatistes sensibles au climato-scepticisme. Peut-être la controverse idéologique qui sous-tend les controverses climatiques ne se résume-t-elle alors pas au seul clivage traditionnel entre partisans et opposants du laisser-faire économique.», «Troisièmement, enfin, les auteurs soulèvent la question de la responsabilité de la communauté scientifique face à l’irruption de cette «politique camouflée en science», «Dès lors, la solution ne passe pas par la production de davantage de données scientifiques, mais plutôt par une meilleure connaissance des règles de la démonstration scientifique»

Arnaud Mercier, CREM, université de Lorraine — https://journals.openedition.org/questionsdecommunication/8579 — «L’ouvrage est donc précieux pour apprendre à repérer les mésusages de la science et les manipulations d’opinion par ceux qui profitent des faiblesses démocratiques tant de la science que de la presse.»

[REVIEW_RETELLING] Luis Moreno Martínez, Universitat de València — https://revistas.uam.es/didacticasespecificas/article/download/10471/10611

[REVIEW_RETELLING] Thomas W. Sherry, Tulane University — https://academic.oup.com/auk/article-pdf/128/2/435/26881188/auk0435.pdf

[REVIEW_RETELLING] Laszlo Kosolosky, Doctoraatsbursaal Universiteit Gent — https://biblio.ugent.be/publication/1960335/file/1960338.pdf

Jonathan M. Samet, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California — https://sci-hub.se/10.1093/aje/kws133

Peder Roberts, postdoctoral researcher at the University of Strasbourg, France — https://sci-hub.se/10.1353/tech.2012.0040 — «Positions on scientific questions with social relevance draw accusations of bias and hidden agendas precisely because agreement among scientists hasbecome associated with political conspiracy rather than collective wisdom. The authors conclude that such consensus deserves our trust not becausethe experts who construct it are infallible, but because it is the best available resource for sound decision-making within the relevant areas of expertise.»

Howard A. Doughty, teaches Cultural Anthropology and Modern Political Thought at Seneca College — https://www.innovation.cc/book-reviews/2016_21_3_5_doughty_bk-rev_oreskes-conway.pdf

[REVIEW_ONE_PAGE] David B. Lindenmayer, The Australian National University — https://sci-hub.se/10.1111/j.1442-9993.2012.02367.x — «but as I outline below, I never-theless believe it is a book that all ecologists and envi-ronmental scientists should read»

[BOOK_OR_AUTHOR_OR_CONCEPT_CRITICISM] Reiner Grundmann, University of Nottingham — https://sci-hub.se/https://link.springer.com/article/10.1057/biosoc.2013.15 — «As far as historical recon-structions go, the analysis of the acid rain controversyis the most persuasive, the chapter on global warmingthe least», «The storyline of the book follows the simple patternof accusing the contrarian protagonists of foul playwithout realizing that the logic of a politics of knowl-edge induces all sides of argument to employ similar tactics», «The authors seem to think policymakers rely on thequality and evidence of scientific research for environ-mental regulation. This exemplifies a technocraticapproach to policymaking, which has largely fallen out of favour in science and technology studies. It istherefore curious to see two historians of scienceembrace this kind of thinking and getting much praise for it.», «Oreskes and Conway espouse a considerable poli-tical naivety about the political process and the roleplayed by scientific research in this.», «Another shortcoming of the book is its lack of conceptual differentiation of different kinds of knowledge and the consequences for policy analysis. Not only is the science/policy interface underdeveloped, the nature ofknowledge that is at stake is never analysed in appro-priate terms.», «The role of non-scientific actors is largely absentfrom the book.», «In the stories about acid rain and global warming the authors do not discuss the abatement costs from fossil fuel burning and how this affects competitive advantage among industries and nations. Yet such considerations are powerful motives for policymakers to embrace or shun regulatory proposals.», «It would haveprovided a contrasting case to examine not only withregard to the issues of scientific ethics but with regardto the politics of knowledge», «or all these reasons I think this is a problematic book. It is disappointing to see professional historiansreduce the complexity to a black and white affair where it goes without saying what the preferred colour is.», «But it is what the title and subtitle suggest: less a scholarly work than a passionate attack on a group of scientists turned lobbyists — and thus itself apartial account. I wonder if it does not do a disservice to the cause it is advocating»

[ADDITIONAL_READING] Naomi Oreskes — Why Trust Science?

[NO_SCEDRECO] -->
1. [Oreskes Naomi](https://histsci.fas.harvard.edu/people/naomi-oreskes), Conway Eric M. — Merchants of Doubt. How a Handful of Scientists Obscured the Truth on Issues from Tobacco Smoke to Global Warming (Bloomsbury, 2010).djvu

<a id="Война-с-наукой"></a>
## Война с наукой

<!--- [JOURNALISM_SCIENCE_DEGREE] [Personal site](https://www.shawnotto.com/full-bio) — «In addition to his books and movies, Otto’s work and ideas have appeared on CBC, BBC, ABC and other television and radio worldwide, in Science, Scientific American, Nature Medicine, The Week, Rolling Stone, Issues in Science and Technology, Salon, Huffington Post, Minnpost, New Scientist, and many others», «His article Antiscience Beliefs Jeopardize U.S. Democracy became the most shared story on Scientific American and was named one of the best commentaries in the United States in 2012»

[CRIM_SPEAKER] [Personal site](https://www.shawnotto.com/speaker)

[REVIEW_CHECK] 2021-6-15

[POSITIVE_OR_NEUTRAL_REVIEW] Jose Perillan, Assistant Professor of Physics & Science, Technology & Society, Vassar College, [Physics and Society](https://higherlogicdownload.s3.amazonaws.com/APS/a05ec1cf-2e34-4fb3-816e-ea1497930d75/UploadedImages/Newsletter_PDF/January18.pdf#page=10) — «My graduate training and subsequent teaching experience in physics, the history of science, and Science, Technology, and Society (STS) studies affords me a perspective that leaves me a bit torn in reading Shawn Otto’s book. On the one hand, I agree with much of Otto’s commentary on our current sociopolitical dilemma and greatly appreciate the thoughtful case studies and analytical insights he brings to our understanding of science and its place in our social fabric.», «In particular Otto’s analysis of the “controversy” surrounding anthropomorphic climate change is an excellent case study that helps to support his argument. Unfortunately, the framing and setup of this argument is too sprawling and often feels a bit haphazard and superficial.», «He seems to take particular issue with Kuhn’s work in the history and philoso-phy of science, yet he significantly misreads Kuhn.», «This speaks to a more fundamental issue I have with The War on Science. At times throughout this book it feels as though Otto stretches and contorts his narrative to overstate intentional conflicts between science and the outside forces of antiscience.», «The framing of Otto’s analysis is ‘us against them’ and from that overly-simplified and polarized perspective, we shouldn’t be surprised that the view of science presented is not at all self-critical. Taking a closer look at scientific practice might reveal that some of the responsibility for today’s “War on Science” is rooted in its own internal rhetoric.»

Elisabeth Eaves, Contributing Editor, Seattle, USA, [Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists](https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/00963402.2016.1240489) — «Otto makes a convincing plea that the stakes are too high not to act.»

[REVIEW_ONE_PAGE] Peter R. Reczek, freelance writer and former Science and Technology Policy Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, [Science](https://sci-hub.se/10.1126/science.aaf9243) — «Otto is at his best when he describes the processes that culminated in the widespread denial of human-caused climate change.»

Ivanka Puigdueta Bartolomé, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, [Relaciones Internacionales](https://repositorio.uam.es/bitstream/handle/10486/676964/RI_33_10.pdf) — «Por su parte, en The War on Science, Shawn Otto aborda los problemas derivados de la desconexión entre el ámbito científico y la sociedad con una perspectiva histórica.»

[N/JSc]

[AUTHOR_PROJECT] [Science Debate](https://sciencedebate.org/) — инициатива дебатов американских политиков по научным вопросам

[NO_PDF][NO_SCEDRECO] -->
1. Otto Shawn Lawrence — The War on Science꞉ Who’s Waging It, Why It Matters, What We Can Do About It (Milkweed Editions, 2016).epub

<a id="Исследования"></a>
## Исследования

<a id="Качественные-исследования"></a>
### Качественные исследования

<a id="Процесс-качественного-исследования"></a>
#### Процесс качественного исследования

<!--- [ACADEMIC_DEGREE] «Ph.D. Communication, 2000, University of Colorado, Boulder; Advisor: Stanley Deetz. Dissertation: Emotion labor and correctional officers: A study of emotion norms, performances and unintended consequences in a total institution.» — https://isearch.asu.edu/profile/283948/cv

[POSITIVE_OR_NEUTRAL_REVIEW] Valerija Barada, Odjel za sociologiju, Sveučilište u Zadru — https://hrcak.srce.hr/file/162194 — «nije lišena uobičaje-nih mana, no zbog nekoliko joj razloga ipak vrijedi pokloniti više pozornosti. Naime, knjiga slijedi projektnu logiku uz istovremenu teorijsku potkrjepu i praktične iskustvene terenske primjere, bez nepotrebne mistifikacije istraživač-kog procesa», «može se ustvrditi kako je temeljna razina primjerena preddi-plomskim kolegijima, dok je napredna mišljena za one diplomske. Za istraži-vanja većih dometa ova bi knjiga ipak mogla biti samo jedna od metodoloških smjernica, nipošto jedina ili glavna.», «Nasuprot tomu, ono što je auto-rica priredila u završnim poglavljima priručnika, može se koristiti kao trajni naputak ili referentan izvor u pisanju i objavljivanju izvještaja i članaka za sve razine studenata/ica, kao i za iskusnije istraživače/ice», «No, priruč-nik obiluje i nizom drugih praktičnih i neposredno primjenjivih naputaka»

Juan Liang, Department of Management, Marketing and Entrepreneurship, University of Canterbury — https://sci-hub.se/10.1080/22041451.2019.1688620 — «Although it was published in 2013,this book is still highly valued and gets widely cited.», «It is a very useful resource for qualitativeresearchers (especially nascent scholars) who seek to understand communication processes», «Rather, as the title suggests, thisbook pays close attention to delivering qualitative research in practice», «Most importantly, it communicates conciseinformation and tactics for ensuring quality qualitative research is conducted and reported ina rigorous, interesting, practical, aesthetic, and ethical manner», «In a nutshell, Tracy’s text is valuable for both young andadvanced researchers who choose a qualitative research journey and producinga comprehensive andfinely nuanced understanding of social phenomena and practices that captures the complexity and multiplicity of the world experienced.»

[ADDITIONAL_READING] Michael Billig, «Learn to Write Badly. How to Succeed in the Social Sciences»

Stéphanie Gaudet, Dominique Robert — «L’aventure de la recherche qualitative: Du questionnement à la rédaction scientifique»

[NO_SCEDRECO] -->
1. Tracy Sarah J. — Qualitative research methods꞉ Collecting evidence, crafting analysis, communicating impact (Wiley-Blackwell, 2020).pdf

<a id="Процесс-исследования"></a>
### Процесс исследования

<!--- [BOOK_SERIES] Уроки для начинающих авторов

[NO_SOURCES] -->
1. [Бут Уэйн](https://www.britannica.com/biography/Wayne-C-Booth), [Коломб Грегори](https://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/author/C/G/au5387674.html), [Уильямс Джозеф](https://news.uchicago.edu/story/joseph-m-williams-professor-emeritus-english-and-linguistics-1933-2008) — Исследование. Шестнадцать уроков для начинающих авторов (Флинта, Наука, 2007).pdf

<a id="Лексиконы-заблуждений"></a>
## Лексиконы заблуждений

<!--- [INFO] В немецком языке имеется термин «[Ittrumslexicon](https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Irrtumslexikon)» — «лексикон заблуждений» -->

<!--- [ACADEMIC_DEGREE] Кремер — «1979: Promotion zum Dr. rer. pol., Johannes Gutenberg Universität Mainz, 1984: Habilitation für Ökonometrie, Technische Universität Wien; 1988 bis 2017: Ordentlicher Professor für Wirtschafts- und Sozialstatistik am Fachbereich Statistik der Universität Dortmund — https://www.statistik.tu-dortmund.de/kraemer-cv.html

Тренклер — «1970—1974: scientific staff at the Institute of applied statistics of the department of Economic Sciences at FU Berlin, Doctorate in 1973, Professor for statistics 1981-1983 — https://www.statistik.tu-dortmund.de/trenkler-cv.html

[CRIM_PLAGIARY] Кремер обвинялся в плагиате — https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Walter_Kr%C3%A4mer#Plagiarism

[NO_SOURCES][NO_SCANNED_PDF][NO_REVIEW][NO_SCEDRECO] -->
1. Кремер Вальтер, Тренклер Гетц — Лексикон популярных заблуждений. 500 ложных мнений, логических ошибок и предубеждений (Крон-Пресс, 2000).fb2

<a id="NR-39"></a>
### NR

<a id="Копирайтеры"></a>
#### Копирайтеры

<!--- [NO_ACADEMIC_OR_PROFESSIONAL_DEGREE] Не нашёл сведений об учёном звании Трибис и её профессионализме. Судя по выпущенным книгам, Трибис — копирайтер — https://www.livelib.ru/author/304694-elena-tribis . 

[BOOK_SERIES] Популярная библиотека самообразования
-->
1. Трибис Елена Евгеньевна — Гипотезы и заблуждения, о которых должен знать современный человек (Рипол-Классик, 2002).pdf

<a id="Естественнонаучные-заблуждения"></a>
### Естественнонаучные заблуждения

1. [Казанцева Ася Андреевна](https://www.corpus.ru/authors/asja-kazanceva.htm) — В интернете кто-то неправ! Научные исследования спорных вопросов (АСТ, Corpus, 2016).pdf

<a id="Менеджерский-подход-к-науке"></a>
## Менеджерский подход к науке

<a id="Научная-несостоятельность-библиометрии"></a>
### Научная несостоятельность библиометрии

<!--- [ACADEMIC_DEGREE] Gingras completed a doctorate in the History and Socio-politics of Science at the University of Montreal in 1984 — https://yvesgingras.uqam.ca/en/about-yves-gingras/biography/

[ACADEMIC_DEGREE_EDITOR] Кирчик Олеся Игоревна, PhD, Социологические науки — https://www.hse.ru/staff/kirtchik

[POSITIVE_OR_NEUTRAL_REVIEW][REVIEW_RETELLING] Малахов Вадим Андреевич, Институт истории естествознания и техники РАН — https://www.elibrary.ru/download/elibrary_42346130_30897042.pdf — «Некоторые места монографии Ива Жэнгра сейчас кажутся уже довольно устаревшими (оригинал на французском языке был издан в 2014 г.). Так, не вполне убедительно выглядит критика распространённой практики выплат премий за публикации в журналах с высоким импакт-фактором.», «Однако, несмотря на некоторые устаревшие положения, Ив Жэнгра даёт очень подробный и компетентный анализ использования библиометрии как инструмента оценки научной деятельности, выявляя её слабые места и ошибки, которые допускают чрезмерно увлекшиеся ей администраторы науки.»;

[REVIEW_RETELLING] Benjamin Caraco, Doctorant en histoire contemporaine à l'Université Paris-1 — https://bbf.enssib.fr/consulter/bbf-2014-02-0186-006

[REVIEW_LONG][REVIEW_HIGH_ERUDITION] Michel Zit, PhD in management science and a Docteur d'État — http://perso.numericable.fr/mzitt/resources/2015JASI-Gingras.pdf — «However, the entire block of bibliometric research which makes it possible to compare varieties of apples (or oranges), i.e., disciplines with similar modes of communication but different citation habits, hardly gets a mention.», «An important topic, the relationship of bibliometrics and peer review, with various modalities (competition, complementarity, mutual influences), is too briefly mentioned except for the author's work on Nobel prizes, while it kept attracting a lot of interest from the community», «Few statements in YGs work are radically questionable. The strangest one is found on p.89"Basically, bibliometrics is a form of sampling"», «Surprisingly, YG is going against type in his reluctance to celebrate the extension of databases to books,arguing firstly that the distribution of articles probably would probably emulate the one of articles, and secondly that the Anglo-American bias would be quite strong in the Book Citation Index.», «The author's convictions on bibliometrics and evaluation are strong and the text keeps the features of a direct conference communication: a refreshing and lively style (in French only, for the time being) but a bit too much personal bias.», «Sections on evaluation aremostlygoodand very pleasing.Globally, the author provides us with a committed vision, albeit one without nuances.»

[REVIEW_RETELLING] Francisco Muñoz-Perez, [Population (French Edition)](https://sci-hub.se/10.2307/43855794)

[REVIEW_RETELLING] Claude Vautier, Université de Toulouse — https://www.erudit.org/fr/revues/npss/2016-v12-n1-npss02874/1038380ar.pdf

[BOOK_OR_AUTHOR_OR_CONCEPT_CRITICISM] Didier Torny, PhD, Sociology ( https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6661-9680 ) — https://journals.openedition.org/sdt/3555 — «Premièrement, en séparant les « bons usages » des mauvais, et les « dérives » d’un fonctionnement normal, l’auteur assume une forme de positivisme.», «Deuxièmement, Y. Gingras sépare nettement des instruments et des indicateurs par nature problématiques, comme l’indice h « mal construit » (p. 63) ou la base de données Google Scholar « dont le contenu est non contrôlé » (p. 85), et ceux qui ne poseraient que des problèmes d’usage. Or, ces derniers ont fait l’objet récemment d’intenses polémiques dans le champ de la scientométrie, et notamment le facteur d’impact, qualifié de mesure « dépassée » dans un numéro spécial de Scientometrics.», «Troisièmement, l’auteur note incidemment que l’apparition d’un concurrent à l’ISI, Scopus, a conduit l’entreprise à modifier les critères d’inclusion des revues dans sa base (p. 87). Mais, plus fondamentalement, depuis les premiers financements obtenus par Eugène Garfield ou Francis Narin dans les années 1960, cette dimension évaluative est constitutive de la construction des outils.»

[NO_PDF] -->
1. Жэнгра Ив — Ошибки в оценке науки, или как правильно использовать библиометрию (Новое литературное обозрение, 2018).epub

<a id="Мир-науки-изнутри"></a>
## Мир науки изнутри

<a id="Жизнь-учёного"></a>
### Жизнь учёного

<!--- [INFO] Селье получал сотни тысяч долларов от юридических фирм, связанных с гигантами табачной индустрии — https://postnauka.ru/longreads/155155 . Но в целом у него остаётся высокая репутация, почему категория R.

[ADDITIONAL_READING] Джеймс Д. Уотсон — «Двойная спираль. Воспоминания об открытии структуры ДНК»

Канке Виктор Андреевич — Взлёты и падения гениев науки

Richard Dawkins — An Appetite for Wonder. The Making of a Scientist
-->
1. [Селье Ганс](https://postnauka.ru/longreads/155155) — От мечты к открытию. Как стать учёным (Прогресс, 1987).djvu

<a id="Мифы-историй-великих-научных-открытий"></a>
### Мифы историй великих научных открытий

<a id="HC-4"></a>
### HC

<!--- [ACADEMIC_DEGREE] «Ph.D. in the History and Philosophy of Science from University College, London (in 2001)» — https://history.msu.edu/people/faculty/john-waller/

[POSITIVE_OR_NEUTRAL_REVIEW][REVIEW_IN_MEDIA] Лясота Е. — http://vespabellicosus2008.narod.ru/pdf8.pdf#page=30 — «В целом, несмотря на явный разоблачительский пафос, рассуж-дения Уоллера производят впечатление справедливых.», «Сразу хочу заступиться за Роберта Милликена: судя по описанию его работ, приведенных Джоном Уоллером, в компании перечисленных ученых ему не место! Он вовсе не занимался подтасовками данных.», «А вот рассказ о методах ведения научных дискуссий Луи Пастером очень поучите-лен.», «Возможно, оценки, которые дает Уоллер личности и действиям ученых, слишком эмоциональны. Но читать о подробностях и перипетиях великих открытий интерес-но. И несомненная польза книги в том, что после ее прочтения начинаешь более взвешенно относиться к рассказам о роли той или иной личности в истории научного открытия.»

[REVIEW_RETELLING] Errol C. Friedberg, Department of Pathology, Southwestern Medical Center, University of Texas — https://sci-hub.se/10.1016/s1568-7864%2803%2900068-5 — «Unfortunately, Waller does not explore the difficult questionsthat all historians must face. What is the truth? Can itever be fully established?», «The book willbe appreciated by anyone with an interest in someof the “great” names in science. But mainly it serves as a cogent reminder that science is as political asany other human endeavor.»

[REVIEW_RETELLING] Andrzej Stasiak, the University of Lausanne, Switzerland — https://europepmc.org/backend/ptpmcrender.fcgi?accid=PMC1315907&blobtype=pdf — «I highly recommend this book to anyone interested in the history and social structure of science.»

[BOOK_OR_AUTHOR_OR_CONCEPT_CRITICISM][REVIEW_SMASHER][REVIEW_IN_MEDIA] Сергеев Александр, научный журналист, модератор Клуба научных журналистов, член Комиссии РАН по борьбе с лженаукой ( https://trv-science.ru/2018/01/ya-slishkom-zhaden-do-novogo/ ) — https://trv-science.ru/2011/03/sud-nad-pobeditelyami/ — «А Уоллер их разрушает, опираясь на публикации историков науки, и, конечно, на… мифы о научных мифах. По иронии судьбы автор сам повторяет ошибки своих персонажей и в какие-то моменты начинает подгонять исторические факты под сложившуюся у него концепцию. Так что книга вполне соответствует своему заглавию.», «В популярной книге эта выпуклость становится и вовсе гипертрофированной, и читателю уже трудно заметить принципиальный факт: критика экспедиции практически игнорирует ключевые для понимания вопросы техники астрономических наблюдений. Дело подается так, будто опытные астрономы просто отбросили при обработке «неудобные» им данные. Понадобилось почти 20 лет, чтобы этот «разоблачительный» миф был в свою очередь разоблачен астрофизиком Дэниэлом Кеннефиком [2].», «С другого рода недоразумением мы сталкиваемся в главе об открытии инсулина.», «Между тем он совершенно огульно критикует одного из исследователей — физиолога Чарлза Беста, обвиняя его фактически в присвоении всей научной славы, и превозносит другого участника работы — биохимика Джеймса Коллипа», «Как и в случае с Эддингтоном, изложение основывается фактически на единственном источнике — книге Майкла Блисса «Открытие инсулина» [4]. И даже этот единственный источник Уоллер пересказывает выборочно.»

John Henry, University of Edinburgh — https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/2415BA1D77A7A6EDCCF96C8F16019F38/S0025727300007869a.pdf — «Clearly intended for the ``popular'' market, Waller's book leaves a lot to be desired as far asthe readership of this journal will be concerned.», «across to the reader who knows something about the history of science and medicine, or something about the philosophy and sociology of science as a ragbag of causes celebres of such differing kinds that it presents no sound conclusions about the nature of modern science», «The naive reader will nodoubt be persuaded. The not so innocent readerwill wonder, however, whether it is legitimate to include a notorious case of the dangers ofscientism, Frederick Taylor's ``scientificmanagement'', or a clear case of ideologicallydriven ``science'', the ``Hawthorne Experiment'', alongside Robert Millikan's attempts to measure the charge on the electron, or Arthur Eddington's attempts to confirm general relativity», «The lessons of each case study do not build up to provide acumulative picture of the dangers or pitfalls ofthe experimental method, or of the institutionalorganization of science, they simply remaininteresting cases in their own right», «Some readers of this review will already havenoted that there is nothing original in Waller'schoice of case studies either», «Waller talks throughout of theimportance of history for understanding thenature of science, but by repeating familiar casestudies he is in danger of showing the povertyof historicism. Instead of repeating old lessons ofhistory, wouldn't it be better to reinforce themwith new case studies?», «The same disparity of historiographicalthemes can be seen in the second part», «For those who do not know these famous cases,Waller's book will no doubt seem fascinating andrevealing. But the cases are justifiably famous,being full of intrinsic interest, and all Wallerhas done is to string them together in anaccessible way»

Alex Dolby, University of Kent — https://sci-hub.se/10.2307/4028363 — «All this is familiar enough to professional historians of science», «Although this is an excellent book, to be recommended to any casual reader of the history of science, its deeper messages worried me. I would like to be able to distinguish (socially embedded) scientific processes of the construction of knowledge from the social recognition system by which honours are apportioned for scientific accomplishment», «dvice. But if we want to celebrate and admire the great icons of scientific accomplishment, the situation is more complicated. It may not be appropriate to cut cultural icons away from their later accretions.», «My conclusion is that if professional history of science is to present itself as a contribution to the popular culture of past scientific accomplishment, it should provide a far clearer understanding than is offered in Waller's book of the relationship between scientific discovery and the cumulative effects of the manner in which scientists seek and are given recognition for their accomplishments»

Aileen Fyfe, Department of History, National University of Ireland, Galway, Republic of Ireland — https://sci-hub.se/10.1016/j.endeavour.2004.06.002 — «At the end of the discussion of both groups is a short concluding essay by Waller that draws out the morals to be learned from thepreceding examples. To my mind, it would have been better to have these assertions presented up front as the intel-ligent reader will already have reached many of theseconclusions by the time they read Waller’s comments.», «One major disappointment I experienced when reading this book is the lack of a concluding essay pondering the implications of the book as a whole, which means that the two sets of case studies remain rather disjointed. Yes, they are all about debunking scientificmyths, but what is their use beyond that», «One of the risks involved in debunking myths is thatyou almost inevitably set up new ones in their place. Waller might claim that what he is doing is replacing fablewith truth, but, as an historian, he must know that evenhis version of the truth might only be the best so far.», «but I was already familiar with most of it and therefore felt that the debunking was a bit heavy handedand patronizing», «It really needs to be read by people whobelieve in these simplified fables about great lone geniuses.»

[REVIEW_HIGH_ERUDITION] David Philip Miller, Senior Lecturer in the School of History and Philosophy of Science — https://sci-hub.se/https://www.jstor.org/stable/3183001 — «However, the execution of the project leaves me disagreeing with him.», «Let me come now to areas of disagreement and concern. Fabulous Science is, from my perspective, grounded in, and underwritten by, a dubious pre-Kuhnian epistemology that is at least 50 years old.», «There is no glimmer here of the sustained critique by modern sociologists of science of Popper's distinction between contexts. More specifically, there is no sign of the attributional model of discovery associated with the writings of Barry Barnes (1982: 41-45, 94-98) and Augustine Brannigan (1981). Nor is there any reference to ideas about 'machine discovery', a hunting ground for cognitivists, who would no more accept Popper putting discovery off limits to serious inquiry than I would. None of these ideas about scientific discovery, arguably necessary to an up-to-date account of theories of discovery, gets airtime in Fabulous Science.», «and is referred to the writings of Shapin and Schaffer even as the radical epistemological implications of that work are ignored. These aspects of the book are disappointing.», «John Waller is to be commended for the attempt, even if he fails, in my view, to achieve the best of balances between those objectives in his framing of these case studies in Fabulous Science»

[REVIEW_ONE_PAGE][REVIEW_RETELLING] Chunglin Kwa, Universiteit van Amsterdam — https://sci-hub.se/10.1179/amb.2003.50.3.310 — «The book as whole shows a tension between Waller's readiness to use work that relativises the truth claims of science (like in his drawing on the work of Trevor Pinch and Harry Collins), and his naive claim to a single historical truth. Even truth in history is "relative" with respect to a perspective chosen, most importantly through a particular style of contextualisation. By drawing on a variety of secondary literature, Waller is likely to have imported more than one style. A bit of reflection here would have done the book no harm.»

[ADDITIONAL_READING] Harry Collins — «The Golem: What You Should Know About Science»

[BOOK_SERIES] Galileo

[DUPLICATE_GI][NO_PDF][NO_SCEDRECO]
 -->
1. Уоллер Джон — Правда и ложь в истории великих открытий (КоЛибри, Азбука-Аттикус, 2011).epub

<a id="Научное-мошенничество"></a>
### Научное мошенничество

<a id="NR-40"></a>
#### NR

<a id="Критика-2"></a>
##### Критика

<!--- [PROFESSIONAL_DEGREE] William J. Broad — science journalist at The New York Times; 2 Pulitzer, Emmy Award, DuPont Award — https://www.nytimes.com/by/william-j-broad ; Nicholas Wade — editor of «Science» and «The New York Times» — https://www.nytimes.com/1982/02/26/nyregion/nicholas-wade-joins-times-to-write-science-editorials.html?searchResultPosition=2

[CRIM_SPEAKER] Wade — https://www.prhspeakers.com/speaker/nicholas-wade

[POSITIVE_OR_NEUTRAL_REVIEW][REVIEW_RETELLING] Jerry Bergman, Ph.D, Universidad de Bowling Green, Ohio — http://www.sedin.org/propesp/X0087_08.htm — «Aunque se trata de un libro excelente acerca de fraude en la ciencia, la discusión de temas laterales, como el asunto de Cyril Burt, la controversia de influencia genética frente a la ambiental, etc., parece más bien superficial y en algunos lugares inadecuada o incorrecta.»

[NOTE] Бергман — креационист — https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Jerry_Bergman

[REVIEW_ONE_PAGE] Patricia Woolf, Princeton University — https://sci-hub.se/10.2307/232382 — «Their brief treatments do not include the detailed arguments presented by historians of science who followed up on the allegations and attempted to put the events in historical perspective. In Betrayers of the Truth there is scant acknowledgement that scientific standards have changed over the two-thousand-year period from 200 B.C. to the present.», «But the potential value of the authors' observations and criticism is diminished by several shortcomings. Broad and Wade do not acknowledge that they have the benefit of hindsight; and they are censorious and often snide in their attempt to indict the entire profession on the basis of limited evidence. Patrons of science and scientists themselves should recognize that the alarm Broad and Wade express is appropriate only in the context of a research enterprise that is largely reliable and diligent.»

[BOOK_OR_AUTHOR_OR_CONCEPT_CRITICISM][REVIEW_SMASHER] Henry H. Bauer, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University — https://sci-hub.se/https://www.jstor.org/stable/690385 — «In the case at hand, alas, it turns our that Broad and Wade are as guilty of fudging their data as were the individuals about whom they write, and very guilty indeed of trying to pass of f their assertions as obj ective or factual.», «An appendix lists 33 "known or suspected [nota bene, suspected] cases of scientific fraud," from the 2nd century BC through 1981. The inference seems obvious, that proven fraud in science is quite extraordinarily rare.», «In another place, they report findings of clear bias and preconception and lack of consistency in the refereeing of articles in psychology, whereas no bias was detected in the reviewing of articles in physics. Yet in spite of this, and without giving a rationale, Broad and Wade are able to "doubt that there are serious differences among the ways that physicists, biologists, or sociologists go about"», «But all of this cited fraud and deceit was uncovered by the members of the scientific community itself, even the community of medical researchers which I briefly derogated above. And yet further, the majority of the cited cases shows that uncovering and retribution follow very swiftly upon the transgres», «But Broad and Wade ignore entirely the important distinction between new claims on the one hand and the long-digested and longaccepted parts of science on the other», « That pulling out of the air of 100s and 1000s is the "evidence" Broad and Wade supply that fraud is not rare in science, that it is endemic; together with, of course, the 33 cases in the appendix -which, as I have already indicated, actually reduce to less than half-a-dozen proven and in science over the course of 2 millennia.», «As it stands, many scientists will not be willing to read the offensive portions of the book in order to get to the good ones; particularly since the former predominate at the beginning, and it is Chapter 7 before the best begin», «Perhaps Broad and Wade believed that only stridency and sensation would have the impact they desired. But for whatever reason, their critique is often so extreme that it becomes as misleading, albeit to the other extreme, as the naive views that the authors rightly criticize. Broad and Wade became carried away with zeal for their mission, and pushed their conclusions not only beyond the evidence but beyond what is reasonasonable. They say, for example, that science is at least as prone to fraud, error, dogma, prejudice as any other human activity, maybe even more so. No evidence is presented for that view, nor does it stand to reason.», «Broad and Wade are correct: the popular view of science is myth, and the historians and philosophers and sociologists of science have pretended, of course without justification, that their partial understandings are the whole story, or at least the most important part of it. But Broad and Wade are also quite wrong when they want to overturn and contradict totally those views and understandings.», «Ultimately, I think, the trouble is that Broad and Wade are not comfortable with the inevitable imperfections of a human enterprise that is open and free, and they become so obsessed with the weaknesses that they discount the strengths -just as political liberals tend to do when democracy does not always produce the results they would like, and they forget that democracy is the worst of all systems except the available alternatives.», «Broad and Wade give absurd prescriptions for "improvements" in the workings of science: absurd because there exists no authority that could implement such changes, absurd also in substance.», «Broad and Wade have gotten quite a deal wrong about science. But they have also got quite a lot right, and their book is even gripping in places, for some of the stories of fraud are fascinating vignettes of people caught in crisis. And Broad and Wade have attempted a task that is certainly important, and one that few others have attempted».

[NOTE] Бауэр — отрицатель ВИЧ — https://web.archive.org/web/20131019110904/http://www.chip.uconn.edu/news/The%20Truth%20About%20HIV%20AIDS%20Denialism.pdf .

Ann C. Weller, MA, American Medical Association — https://sci-hub.se/https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/article-abstract/392582 — «But, if fraud is truly endemic, there is little hope that any of these measures would be very successful. Betrayers of the Truth is important because it summarizes many cases of fraudulent behavior.», «This book is well worth reading for anyone who participates in the accumulation and distribution of scientific knowledge.», «The authors state that the plagiarist Alsabti was successful and that "shows how ineffectually the social mechanisms of science operate." They seem to have lost sight of the fact that none of the perpetrators discussed in their book were ultimately successful. They expect that for every case of detected major fraud, 100 cases go undetected. It seems that they have also fallen victim to the temptation to draw conclusions not supported by scientific data»

Gunther S. Stent, Department of Molecular Biology, University of California — https://sci-hub.se/https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/0092867483900016 — «Alas, here they overreach themselves. Those parts of the book in which they draw cosmic inferences about “the real nature of science,” which they think “is widely misunderstood by scientists and the public” (p, 7) is best characterized as pretentious and malevolent baloney.», «In addition to their putting forward mainly cant rather than forceful arguments to support their claim that a few bad apples are symptomatic of a general moral rot in the barrel of science, Broad and Wade’s many errors and inconsistencies indicate their lack of qualification for pontificating about the nature of science. For instance, if they ad actually read Galileo’s Dialogue, which they cite on page 27 to indict him, they would have known that Simplicio’s interlocutor is not Galileo but Salviati (as well as Sangredo); or, if they were familiar with the history of evolutionary theory, they would have known that Lamarck was a precursor rather than a rival of Darwin (p. 181) and that, in view of Darwin’s eventual acceptance of the inheritance of acquired characteristics, Paul Kammerer’s doctored midwife toad was supposed to support Lamarckism against Mendelism, not against Darwinism (p. 182). As for inconsistencies, they ask on page 83 “how common is fraud in science?” and reply, not unreasonably, that “the question, of course, does not admit to a precise answer”.», «Fortunately, these abstruse metaphysical arguments about the nature of truth are only remotely relevant to most of workaday science, for which naive realism is a quite adequate-and maybe the only possible-epistemological basis. They need to be brought forward only to clear up the confusion sown by Broad and Wade’s nasty insinuation that fraud and deceit are integral parts of the scientific process.», «Suppose we accepted their recommendation and wanted to study science journalism through its pathology; then we need look no farther than to the authors of Betrayers of the Truth to begin our diagnosis of why that profession too is not what it ought to be.»

[REVIEW_SMASHER] Daryl E. Chubin — Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta — https://sci-hub.se/10.1177/016224398300800405 — «Mr. Wade should be proud: He convinced me (and I daresay everyone else in attendance) that professional science writers are subject to the same frailty they decry in scientists.», «Moreover, they show significant ignorance of the relevant work in “social studies of science,” in particular, the substantive work of non-North American writers. For example, they invoke the decade-old and stillspecious rejection of the “Ortega hypothesis”’ on the one hand (see point 14 above) yet bemoan elitism on the other. That is simplistic and contradictory. They cite Zuckerman on deviance but omit Collins’ on replication. That is disconcerting. They expound on “credit” and “literary convention” without consulting Latour and Woolgar.’ That is unfortunate. They propose citation analysis as an apolitical evaluation tool-implying its independence from elite manipulation (as well as the creeping “Matthew effect,” which they do acknowledge). This is naive and dangerous.», «But in exposing the gap between what scientists say and do, they have underscored their own myopia.», «There is no novelty to claiming, as the authors do, that the portrayals of science by historians, philosophers, and sociologists are inadequate. So, too, are the portrayals by science writers and by scientists themselves. That’s why we need one another: to fashion a more adequate portrait of science and perhaps in the process also fashion a more adequate definition of the scientific community and the careers it often celebrates and sometimes reviles»

Письмо, подписанное 100 учёными, против другой книги Уэйда “A Troublesome Inheritance: Genes, Race and Human History” — https://cehg.stanford.edu/letter-from-population-geneticists

[NO_SCEDRECO]
-->
1. Broad William J., Wade Nicholas — Betrayers of the truth (Simon and Schuster, 1983).djvu

<a id="Повседневная-деятельность-учёных"></a>
### Повседневная деятельность учёных

<!--- [ACADEMIC_DEGREE] [UT Southwestern Medical Center](https://www.utsouthwestern.edu/labs/grinnell/bio/cv.html) — «1970 Ph.D., Biochemistry, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts (with Jon Nishimura)»

[CRIM_RELIGION] Страница 181 — «Figure 6.1 diagrams the complementarity of science and religion as “two aspects of the same thing” by combining these two attitudes into Bohr’s yin-yang family crest. Life for the person begins in the me, here, now of everyday life experience. Th e fi lters (interpretive/ experiential frameworks) of the religious and scientifi c attitudes reveal distinct domains of knowledge that cannot be seen or inferred or negated from the other perspective. The religious attitude gives us James’s unseen order to which the individual seeks to conform. Th e scientifi c attitude gives us the anyone, anywhere, anytime of intersubjectivity. Th ese domains are separate, but they cannot remain separated. Rather, they merge into a holistic yin-yang framework that cannot be harmonized or resolved further. Th ey exist in dynamic tension—constantly bouncing off each other and inevitably off ering diff erent types of answers to the fundamental questions about the self and the world.»

В других местах 6-й главы такого явного положительного отношения к религии я не увидел, почему поставил кри-маркер, но не снизил категорию

[Ti/Mono]

[POSITIVE_OR_NEUTRAL_REVIEW] Cory Lewis, PhD candidate at the IHPST Toronto. He works on general philosophy ofscience, with a focus on philosophy of biology, [Spontaneous Generations: A Journal for the History and Philosophy ofScience](https://spontaneousgenerations.library.utoronto.ca/index.php/SpontaneousGenerations/article/download/16152/15614/) — «Clearly, Grinnell’s project is ambitious, especially for a book that is so shortand accessible. His success in communicating some of the core issues in thephilosophy of science and their source in inescapable practical issues is striking.While philosophers of science may not find much that is new to them inthis work, they will surely appreciate the delicate balance Grinnell managesto achieve between serious engagement with canonical abstract problems andclear-headed pragmatism», «Having read its lessthan 200 pages, a person will clearly not have mastered its varied topics. DespiteGrinnell’s to-the-point style, there is only so much that can be done in one book.», «Sophisticated as his perspective is, Grinnell is expressing what isessentially the consensus view in science studies today (except, perhaps, in his final section on religion, where it is doubtful that consensus even exists).»

José Vázquez, [CBE — Life Sciences Education](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3228650/) — «What is surprising about this book is the way it provides various avenues to engage in productive discussions about doing research.», «Chapter 6, “Faith: More Than One Way to Practice the World,” makes an intersection between science and religion.», «He compares both categories, and tries to dissect the complementarity between those two. I found this chapter to be the least effective. For instance, when he argues that religion “requires a different kind of faith than science but in no way gives up the demand for reason” (p. 169), he does not provide a convincing argument about the reasoning involved in faith. His suggestion that religion is the source of our values, working in a complementary way with science (p. 181, Figure 6.1), is an extremely controversial assumption with which many of the scientists mentioned in the book may disagree. He concludes the book by saying: “Perhaps solving global problems will require the scientific and religious attitudes—both types of faith—rather than one or the other” (p. 185). Perhaps not.», «I especially enjoyed those sections dealing with the process of inquiry, which may benefit those of us who are in the classroom presenting scientific ideas and literature.», «However, I would have liked to read about Grinnell's take on other forms of inquiry, such as those in the humanities and social sciences. Moreover, although Grinnell deftly presents the role of the scientist in the complex world of laboratory research, the additional role of the scientist as a citizen is not well developed. Instead, he chose to veer toward the notion of science and religion.», «This book is a clear testament that we need more books that address issues of how to educate future scientists.»

[REVIEW_ONE_PAGE] Michael R. Dietrich, Biological Sciences, Dart-mouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire, [The Quarterly Review of Biology](https://sci-hub.se/10.1086/644652) — «Grinnell’s as-tute criticism of the “patent and prosper” model ofscience correctly draws our attention to how thisprivatization of science undercuts the trust essen-tial for scientific success.», «Everyday Practice of Scienceshould be required reading for any young scientist seeking a deeper and more fully contextualized understanding of science and its impact on soci-ety.»

Juljan Krause, Department of Sociology, London School of Economics & Political Science, London, UK, [Science as Culture](https://sci-hub.se/10.1080/09505431.2010.512361), «(Post)Enlightened Science» — «Although very different in style, scope and methodology, the two books underreview both illustrate the changing picture of what it means to be a scientistembedded in complex research communities and thereby contribute to an under-standing of the social function of science in general.», «Now, reference to intuition is, of course, problematic.», «Falsely equating the ‘Strong Programme’ with postmodernism, however, he argues that the postmo-dernists are wrong.», «What makes this book an important contribution to the sociology and philos-ophy of science is its disarmingly honest take on questions of objectivity andvalue-ladenness in applied research», «Philosophers of science fond of Hardwig (1985) will be quick topoint out that aggregation problems apply. How can objectivity be a property ofthe whole if it is not in the parts?», «Depending on the preferences of the reader as to how much sociological expla-nation successful histories and philosophies of science require, this book providesa balanced view which is refreshingly honest about the influence multiple stake-holders have on scientific research today—religious groups, the US governmentand the pharmaceutical industry are discussed», «Some readers may have hoped for a stronger defence of science and freedom of speech», «Illuminating and entertaining, both books illustrate how larger socio-political and cultural frameworks impact on our under-standing of the nature of scientific discovery — the authors share a fundamental belief in the power of reason ultimately to unravel scientific truths.»

[BOOK_OR_AUTHOR_OR_CONCEPT_CRITICISM] D. P. Dash, Swinburne University of Technology (Sarawak Campus), Kuching, Malaysia and Xavier Institute of Management, Bhubaneswar, India — [Journal of Research Practice](https://jrp.icaap.org/index.php/jrp/article/download/175/206/) — «In fact, one basic uncertainty researchers outside experimental science face is in selecting an appropriate method of inquiry in the first place (e.g., Probert, 2006), that is sometimes resolved by selecting a “mixed” method (Mingers & Brocklesby, 1997; Vakkayil, 2007). This issue receives little attention in the book because of the restricted image of science adopted», « The book’s limited exposition of the ethical issues in science again reflects the restricted conception of science adopted.», «The debatable nature of scientific expertise, as discussed in the broader discourse concerning science and society (e.g., Wachbroit, 1999), is not explored adequately in the book.», «Regarding the complementarity between science and religion, the book opens up a complex topic without equipping the reader sufficiently to deal with that complexity. The level of precision achieved in the description of experimental science is missing in the description of religion.», «Somehow, this particular description sounds more scientific than religious to this reviewer.», «Working with his restricted notion of experimental science, Grinnell recognises that “[t]he features that make each person unique and special from a humanistic point of view can confound scientific research” (p. 134).», «What Grinnell does not recognise is the possibility of reframing his idea of science to accommodate the humanistic point of view, for example, to find effective means to enable unique persons to collaborate and overcome some of their collective challenges?», «Interesting examples of reframing the idea of science can be found in many domains. It need not always be about discovering “physical mechanisms of the world” as Grinnell states», «Despite the shortcomings mentioned above, the book’s campaign against the linear model of science is rather vibrant and forceful. Given the pervasiveness of the linear model, the book’s message is quite valuable, particularly as it captures some authentic reflections of a practising scientist», «The book provides useful learning material for every researcher (not only scientists).», «Insider accounts of research such as this serve to foreground the high adventure of research and the passion of researchers. Readingsuch material can support research education in a special way, by promoting an understanding of research as a process of critical engagement with thought styles, of one’s own and of the others, within the overarching ethic of humility», «As for the more advanced task of research education, that is, to enable researchers to breed and nurture different forms of inquiry, one needs to look elsewhere»

[REVIEW_NO_ACCESS] Jonas Alsenas, [Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies](https://www.pdcnet.org/jis/content/jis_2011_0023_0001_0195_0196)

[ADDITIONAL_READING] Samantha L. Elliott, Beth A. Fischer, Frederick Grinnell, Michael Zigmond — «Perspectives on Research Integrity»

Grinnell, Frederick — «The Scientific Attitude»

D. P. Dash — «Problems of action research — as I see it»

Thomas L. Hankins — «Science and the Enlightenment»

Philip Kitcher — «The Advancement of Science. Science without Legend, Objectivity without Illusions»

David L. Hull — «Science as a Process: An Evolutionary Account of the Social and Conceptual Development of Science»

John L. Rudolph — How We Teach Science: What’s Changed, and Why It Matters

[NO_SCEDRECO] -->
1. Grinnell Frederick — Everyday Practice of Science. Where Intuition and Passion Meet Objectivity and Logic (Oxford University Press, 2009).pdf

<a id="Разновидности-злоупотреблений-учёных"></a>
### Разновидности злоупотреблений учёных

<!--- [ACADEMIC_DEGREE] [University of Edinburgh, PhD Thesis](https://era.ed.ac.uk/bitstream/handle/1842/9846/Ritchie2014.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y) — «Studies Concerning the Application of Psychological Scienceto Education — The University of Edinburgh, 2013»

[REVIEW_CHECK] 2021-6-9

[POSITIVE_OR_NEUTRAL_REVIEW][REVIEW_ONE_PAGE] Roland Seifert, Medizinische Hochschule, Hannover, Deutschland, [BIOspectrum](https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s12268-020-1497-9.pdf) — «Dieses Buch ist ein also ein must-read und das perfekte Weih-nachtsgeschenk für jeden Wissen-schaftler, jeden Uni-Präsidenten, jeden Fakultätsdekan, jeden Wis-senschaftspolitiker, jeden Journal-Editor, jeden Mitarbeiter von Dritt-mittel-vergebenden Institutionen und auch Autoren jeder Proveni-enz (z. B. namhafter Wochenzeit-schriften), die Wissenschafts-Ran-kings aller Art publizieren.»

Anders Sundell, universitetslektor vid Statsvetenskapliga institutionen, Göteborgs universitet, [Litteraturgranskningar](https://journals.lub.lu.se/st/article/download/22385/19953) — «Medan Alvesson, Gabriel och Paulsen (2017) vill lösgöra sig från världsligheter som källhänvisningar och uppvärdera intellektualism vill Ritchie snarast gå åt andra hållet, mot större systematik, transparens och kontroll. Ett karriärsystem utan några mätbara kriterier för framgång skulle lämna stort utrymme för godtycke och nepotism.», «För den som har följt debatten om replikationskrisen någorlunda erbjuder Stuart Ritchies bok egentligen inget nytt, men är ändå en gedigen och nyanse-rad översikt från en som vill vetenskapen väl. Den borde vara obligatorisk läs-ning på alla forskarutbildningar. Vetenskapen är för viktig för att reduceras till en jakt på klistermärken.»

Claudia Frick, Zentralbibliothek des Forschungszentrums Jülich, [o-bib. Das offene Bibliotheksjournal](https://www.o-bib.de/article/view/5639/8174) — «In seinem letzten Kapitel vor dem Epilog versucht Ritchie, Auswege aus diesen Problemen aufzuzeigen. Die präsentierten Ideen sind dabei meist nicht unbekannt und wurden oder werden in der Wissenschaft bereits diskutiert, z.B. automatisierte Plausibilitätschecks von statistischen Datenauswertungen, Zeitschriften, die auch negative Studienergebnisse publizieren, und Prä-Registrierung von Studien. Hier fehlt es jedoch etwas an Substanz und an einem größeren Überblick, wenn man an all die bereits existierenden Initiativen denkt, oder zumindest an einem klaren Appell an die eigenen Kolleg*innen, hier aktiv zu werden.», «Was am gesamten Buch auffällt, ist die klare Fokussierung auf quantitative Forschung. Qualitative und explorative Methoden werden dagegen kaum betrachtet. Außerdem klammert Ritchie bestimmte Wissenschaften, wie die Mathematik und die Geisteswissenschaften, fast gänzlich aus.3 Eine Betrachtung, welche Probleme in diesen Bereichen in ähnlicher Weise auftreten, welche gar nicht und welche anderen dafür zusätzlich, wäre zweifelsohne interessant gewesen.», «„Science fictions“ spricht aus der Wissenschaft heraus selbstbewusst vorhandene Probleme in Wissenschaft und Forschung an und bringt sie in gut aufbereiteter und unterhaltsamer Form einer breiten Öffentlichkeit näher.», «Insgesamt gibt das Buch einen guten Gesamtüberblick über das Thema, lässt allerdings bei der Lösungsfindung noch viel Raum für Kreativität.»

Nicklas Neuman, docent, Institutionen För Kostvetenskap, Uppsala Universitet. Ledamot Av Professionsförbundets Styrelse, [Professionsförbunde](https://media.professionsforbundet.se/2020/12/Nr_8_december_2020.pdf) — «Det jag finner allra mest be-friande med både boken och hela Open Science-rörelsen är den kompromisslösa och helt ogenerade kritiken mot vetenskapens absoluta kärna. Det är som sagt inte ”där bor-ta” som problemen huvud-sakligen lokaliseras, utan rakt i hjärtat av hårda vetenskaper och (förmodat) banbrytande metoder.», «Det finns förstås missar i boken, det vore ju närmast ett hån mot författaren själv om man läser honom med precis den slapphet han genomgående kritiserar. Mina kritiska synpunkter på boken gäller dock inte så mycket det Ritchie skrivit, snarare det han ute-lämnar.», «Jag nämnde tidigare att det som i boken klassificeras som vetenskap är replikerbar forskning med kvantitativ metod. Detta utesluter med andra ord mycket humaniora och all forskning med kvali-tativa metoder (från företags-ekonomi till vårdvetenskap).», «En cynisk tolkning är att Ritchie därmed i tysthet för-kastar anspråk på vetenskap-lighet hos all sådan forsk-ning. Den bevärdigas därför inte ens kritik. En snällare tolkning är istället att han är pragmatisk och ödmjuk inför sina egna tillkortakomman-den.», «Men som läsare bör man i alla fall vara med-veten om att samtliga diagno-ser inte alltid är överförbara på hela forskarsamhället. Det finns med andra ord både problemområden och poten-tiella lösningar som Ritchie inte reder ut.», «Vad jag däremot finner lite besynnerligt är att en bok som i så stor utsträck-ning bygger på forskning om forskning (metavetenskap), och som diskuterar vetenskap som samhällsinstitution, inte ens går in i konversation med humaniora och samhällsve-tenskap som ändå studerat just detta i decennier.»

David Robert Grimes, Dublin City University, [Public Understanding of Science](https://medium.com/scicomm-book-reviews/science-fictions-exposing-fraud-bias-negligence-and-hype-in-science-3490a2364fa9) — «Ritchie is a psychologist by training, and ideally placed to convey the extent of the problem.», «Thankfully, a reader does not require a background in meta-research to enjoy this well-written introduction to a serious problem, and Science Fictions serves as a superb introduction, framing a serious problem without resorting to alarmism.»

J R Shackleton, University of Buckingham, UK, [Economic Affairs](https://sci-hub.se/10.1111/ECAF.12427) — «Neither of these issues is discussed in detail in this fascinating book. But anybody who reads it will have some qualms about putting quite so much faith in scientists’ wisdom and bona fides.»

[BOOK_OR_AUTHOR_OR_CONCEPT_CRITICISM] Sally A. Larsen, Department of Psychology, University of New England, Armidale, NSW, Australia, [Frontiers in Psychology](https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.666441/full) — «Ritchie goes even further when he proposes that most flawed scientific work is never discovered. In relation to data fabrication: “If this kind of fraud occurs at the very highest levels of science, it suggests that there's much more of it that flies under the radar, in less well-known journals” (p.60). Is this evaluation completely justified? There's no way of knowing, but it seems at least possible that data may be “tweaked” for the purposes of fitting the brief of prestigious journals, so that authors can claim both the status of a groundbreaking finding and a publication in an internationally renowned outlet. The vast majority of scientists working to develop incremental knowledge might be less likely to participate in such schemes.», «There's something of a contradiction in terms in the overall theme that runs through the book. On the one hand Ritchie insists that it is the flaws in human nature that underlie the problems, rather than faults in the scientific method. On the other hand, the notion that the whole enterprise might be rescued via the efforts of those same flawed people seems overly optimistic.», «Nonetheless, it's not entirely clear who Ritchie's intended audience is. Working scientists are likely already well-aware of the problems in the system, but the general reader might not be overly interested in directions for scientists on how to go about clearing up their own backyard.», «Unfortunately, the book contains few examples of the scientific process working in the way it is supposed to, which might have the opposite effect in the public domain than what is intended. Readers might come away with a greater skepticism of any scientific findings, rather than more faith that the process will discover “the truth” about anything.», «whether a popular science book is the right forum for this discussion I will leave to the reader to decide»

[REVIEW_IN_MEDIA][REVIEW_HIGH_ERUDITION] John Eric Rayner Staddon, Duke Distinguished Professor Emeritus of Psychology and Neuroscience, [DRAFT Academic Questions](https://dukespace.lib.duke.edu/dspace/bitstream/handle/10161/21418/RitchieReview.pdf) — «this lively and important book.», «I thought that I was reasonably familiar with the science’s problems, but Ritchie’s book convinced me that I had greatly under-estimated them.», «What should be done to correct these malpractices? Here I differ slightly with author Ritchie, who suggests, among other things, that scientists should abandon “small studies”, which are likely by chance to show spuriously large effects, in favor of large ones, with many subjects, simply because effects found in a large sample are more likely to be replicable.», «Stuart Ritchie has written a thoughtful, well-researchedand surprisingly readable book on a difficult but hugely important topic.», «Science Fictions can help us understand how corrupt science has become. To cure this corruptionwe must also understand the social forces that have brought it about. Perhaps that will be a topic for Ritchie’s next book.»

[REVIEW_PERSONAL_COMMENTS] Книга открывает реальную, а не лакированную картину научного сообщества, как это бывает в российской научно-популярной литературе. В отличие от Ларсен, считаю такие книги, где показана не односторонняя пропаганда науки, однозначно полезными.

Fiona Fidler, University of Melbourne, [Nature](https://media.nature.com/original/magazine-assets/d41586-020-02147-1/d41586-020-02147-1.pdf) — «At times, I was slightly frustrated that this came at the price of sepa-rating issues that would ideally be presented together: P values and statistical power are explained in different chapters, and the dis-cussion of publication bias is elsewhere again. In the end, however, the trade-off is worth it.», «So I was puzzled that after introducing philosopher Cordelia Fine’s arguments for including fem-inist perspectives in science, he doesn’t con-nect these with Longino’s concept of collective objectivity; instead, he dismisses Fine’s points.», «Ritchie seems to find Fine’s arguments incom-patible with other strategies for mitigating bias, such as preregistration and blinded trials. I disagree: they are from the same toolbox.», «But occasionally he rests too heavily on the idea that there were once golden days when science was a pure truth-seeking enterprise. For example, he bemoans that we have allowed science to “become so tarnished, and its progress to be so badly stalled”», «but I do wonder whether Ritchie means to suggest that there was time when scientists did uphold Merton’s norms. If so, I suspect most historians of science would respectfully disagree.», «Towards the end of the book, rightly implor-ing us to take responsibility for the mess, Ritchie refers to a moment “when the scien-tific community gave its collective approval to these low-powered studies”. Yet underpow-ered studies have been the norm since statis-tical-significance testing entered the social and life sciences after the Second World War.»

[Is/Mono]

[NO_PDF][NO_SCEDRECO] -->
1. Ritchie Stuart James — Science Fictions. How Fraud, Bias, Negligence and Hype Undermine the Search for Truth (Henry Holt and Co., 2020).epub

<a id="Наука-для-повседневности"></a>
## Наука для повседневности

<a id="Научное-рассмотрение-вопросов-повседневной-жизни"></a>
### Научное рассмотрение вопросов повседневной жизни

<!--- [INFO] В категорию для научных писателей. В книге, к сожалению, мало ссылок на источники информации; использовать с осторожностью. 

[AUTHOR_PROJECT] «Science for Life» («Наука для жизни») — персональный блог автора о том, что наука говорит об изменении жизни к лучшему
-->
1. [Клегг Брайан](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brian_Clegg_(writer)) — Кому верить？ Что мы на самом деле знаем о мире вокруг нас (Манн, Иванов и Фербер, 2017).fb2

<a id="Научная-картина-мира"></a>
## Научная картина мира

<a id="Естественнонаучная-картина-мира"></a>
### Естественнонаучная картина мира

<!--- [ACADEMIC_DEGREE] «Доктор философских наук; До марта 2017 года был ведущим научным сотрудником сектора истории антропологических учений ИФ РАН» — https://iphras.ru/klyagin.htm

[ACADEMIC_DEGREE_EDITOR] Шурупова Яна Андреевна, «В 2015 году закончила с отличием магистратуру в МГГУ им. Шолохова, специальность биология. С 2016 года сотрудник кафедры биологической эволюции. В 2020 году закончила аспирантуру биологического факультета МГУ кафедры биологической эволюции.» — https://bioevolution-msu.ru/index.php/ru/o-kafedre/sotrudniki/uchebno-vspomogatelnyj-personal/259-shurupova-yana-andreevna . Учёного звания нет, повышение категории не засчитывается

[CRIM_CORRUPTION] В имеющемся на LibGen PDF-файле книги не отображаются правильно названия заголовков и подзаголовков, страницы 64, 66—67 нечитабельны

[NO_OCR] -->
1. Клягин Николай Васильевич — Современная научная картина мира. Учебное пособие (Логос, 2007).fb2

<a id="Законы-мироздания"></a>
### Законы мироздания

<!--- [ACADEMIC_DEGREE] «Ph.D., 1966, Stanford Linear Accelerator Center, Stanford, CA, fellow, 1966; European Center for Nuclear Research, Geneva, Switzerland, fellow, 1966–67; Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, fellow at Laboratory for Nuclear Science, 1967–68; University of Illinois, Urbana, assistant professor of physics, 1968–70; University of Virginia, Charlottesville, fellow, Center for Advanced Studies, and associate professor, 1970–75, professor of physics, 1975–88; George Mason University, Fairfax, VA, Clarence J. Robinson Professor of Physics, 1988–. Phi Beta Kappa visiting scholar, 2003–04. National Public Radio (NPR), science advisor and commentator.» — https://www.encyclopedia.com/arts/educational-magazines/trefil-james-s-1938 . Трефил — специалист только в физике, но так как в книге рассматриваются и другие науки, она подпадает под третью категорию.

[DUPLICATE_GI] -->
1. Трефил Джеймс — 200 законов мироздания (Гелеос, 2007).pdf

<a id="Научная-коммуникация"></a>
## Научная коммуникация

<a id="Индивидуальный-научный-пиар-для-учёных"></a>
### Индивидуальный научный пиар для учёных

<!--- [ACADEMIC_DEGREE] [Personal site](http://randyolsonproductions.com/about/) — «Randy Olson was a humble, mild-mannered professor of marine biology at the University of New Hampshire.», «Despite his Harvard Ph.D., four years of post-doctoral research in Australia and Florida, and years of diving around the world from the Great Barrier Reef to Antarctica»

[N/WS]

[POSITIVE_OR_NEUTRAL_REVIEW] Melissa Payne, Durham, North Carolina, [Ecopsychology](https://sci-hub.se/10.1089/eco.2010.0061) — «Similarly themed books just out on the market are aimed at thegeneral public or concerned citizens, whereas this one specificallyspeaks to scientists and gives them a slap on the hand.», «Do not expect pages of facts and references tostudies—this is not that kind of book. And, do not expect to be underliningtext, as you will be too engrossed in thestorytelling for that kind of focus», «I understand Olson’s point, but the fact is—if I do not stick with the facts, even to make a message easier to un-derstand, I will lose credibility with the public, myself, and my boss andcoworkers.», «I feel like someone is telling me how to bake a cake, and lefthalfway through without giving me the recipe for the icing.», «Still, I would have liked to have seen more successfulexamples of how movies capture people’s interest in science—maybethat will be discussed in the next book?», «Itis not enough to merely educate the public. Some might argue thateducating the public is not even our goal; instead, we are trying tochange their behavior. Here, Olsen has hit the target: it is not enoughto change their minds. You must reach their hearts, their guts, andmore, if possible, to really resonate.», «Olson asks science types torise to a pretty high bar in the communication world, and I respectthat. It is good to have goals. On the other hand, I do not see thesegoals as completely realistic. The best take-home message from Don’t be Such a Scientist is to know the principles and apply them when wecan.», «This book is written like Olson is sitting next to you in the car on a roadtrip.»

[REVIEW_BE_CAREFUL] Критическое отношение учёных к экопсихологии/-терапии — [Healthy But Smart](https://healthybutsmart.com/Ecotherapy+Health+Benefits), [Jorge Conesa-Sevilla — Ecopsychology Revisited](https://digitalcommons.humboldt.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1012&context=monographs#page=41)

Michael N. Dawson, School of Natural Sciences, University of Cali-fornia at Merced, [Frontiers of Biogeography](https://escholarship.org/content/qt5rx289rd/qt5rx289rd.pdf) — «Don’t Be Such A Scientist encourages us to have greater empathy with the general public, to understand their needs, wants, and desires, and to tell them stories about the wonder of science to which they can relate. In doing so, they will also be stimulated to learn more for themselves.», «The public want us to communi-cate, the scientific establishment is encouraging us to communicate (e.g. NSF 2008; EU 2007), and Olson has provided us with a few tips on how to do it successfully. If you’re not convinced he’s got something useful to say, then next time you’re on a plane, try turning on the movie, turning off the sound, and spending 5% of your time watching the movie and 95% of your time reading this book; you’ll understand the plot and outcome of the movie and might not even care you missed the details in the dialogue»

[BOOK_OR_AUTHOR_OR_CONCEPT_CRITICISM][REVIEW_ONE_PAGE] Michael Brooks, [New Scientist](https://sci-hub.se/10.1016/S0262-4079(09)62635-X) — «The idea has some appeal, but is this really the right way for scientists to go? With climate change, perhaps the end justifies the means. But Olson’s argument is predicated on the assumption that in general scientists have news and opinions that matter to the broader public. That may not always be so.», «Do we really want to run the risk of turning science into a spin game? It might well be counter-productive – not to mention unscientific – to act on Olson’s advice and start bending the facts when they get in the way of attracting people’s attention.», «Then again, given Gore’s success and the prevalence of scientific illiteracy, it remains an interesting path to consider. Olson’s engaging and timely book will surely spark an important and controversial debate about science’s place in society.»

[REVIEW_RETELLING] Richard Hartel, University of Wisconsin-Madison, [Journal of Food Science Education](https://sci-hub.se/10.1111/J.1541-4329.2010.00115.X) — «What do we learn from this book that can help us in class? Ithink it comes down to how we motivate.»

Jonathan H. Sharp, Professor of Oceanography, School of Marine Science and Policy, University of Delaware, Lewes, [Oceanography](https://tos.org/oceanography/assets/docs/22-4_sharp.pdf) — «Some readers might find his autobiographical approach too personal, but it is effective partially because of his humility. He is very critical of the poor communica-tion success of scientists and most often pokes fun at himself as an example of what is wrong with the typical scientist’s approach.», «This book is well written and inter-esting. More importantly, it has a compelling message for the scientific community.», «I think that most ocean scientists do not think that everything is going fine. To them, I strongly recom-mend this book»

Dennis F. Mangan, Santa Rosa, California, [Microbe Magazine](http://www.asmscience.org/deliver/fulltext/microbe/7/10/znw01012000484.pdf?itemId=/content/journal/microbe/10.1128/microbe.7.484.1&mimeType=pdf) — «Randy Olson comes across as a “cool dude” with interesting stories to tell. That’s exactly the point he’s trying to make in this book…», «I also recommend thebook for all researchers at any stage in a science career: it’s an enjoyable read, inexpensive, and delivers an importantmessage we often don’t hear or remember.», «Regardless of what style youchoose, don’t be such a scientist!»

[ADDITIONAL_READING] Randy Olson, Dorie Barton, Brian Palermo — «Connection. Hollywood Storytelling meets Critical Thinking»

José Ramos Vivas — «Manual de comunicación y divulgación científica»

[NO_SCEDRECO][CRIM_SOURCES_QUALITY] -->
1. Olson Randy — Don’t Be Such a Scientist. Talking Substance in an Age of Style (Island Press, 2018).pdf

<a id="Научный-скептицизм"></a>
## Научный скептицизм

<a id="Индивидуальное-противостояние-ненаучной-ерунде"></a>
### Индивидуальное противостояние ненаучной ерунде

<!--- [INFO] Сам «Джон Грант» (Пол Барнетт) не является учёным, но источников, вероятно, указывает достаточно для категории «R» по Кристинограду -->
1. [Грант Джон](http://clarkesworldmagazine.com/grant_interview/) — Не верю! Как увидеть правду в море дезинформации (Альпина Диджитал, 2014).pdf

<a id="Нормативно-неуместное-инакомыслие-NID"></a>
### Нормативно неуместное инакомыслие (NID)

<!--- [NOTE] Не нашёл устоявшегося русского перевода термину “Normatively Inappropriate Dissent” -->

<a id="HC-5"></a>
#### HC

<!--- [ACADEMIC_DEGREE] Inmaculada de Melo-Martín, [Universidad de Oviedo, CV](https://demeter.grupos.uniovi.es/documents/492370/971756/CV.Inmaculada.Melo.pdf) — «Doctorado in Filosofía, University of South Florida, 1997», «Líneas de investigación Breve descripción, por medio de palabras claves, de la especialización y líneas de investigación actuales.Filosofía de la ciencia, bioética, filosofía dela tecnología»

Kristen K. Intemann, [Montana State University, CV](https://www.montana.edu/history/documents/faculty/IntemannCV2017.pdf) — «Ph.D. 2004 University of Washington (Philosophy)», «Areas of Specialization: Philosophy of Science, Feminist Philosophy, Practical Ethics (Research Ethics, Biomedical Ethics, Environmental Ethics)», «Areas of Competence: Social and Political Philosophy, Ethical Theory, Epistemology»

[REVIEW_CHECK] 2021-6-17

[POSITIVE_OR_NEUTRAL_REVIEW] Daria Jadreškić, David Hopf, Tobias Schönwitz, Institute of Philosophy, Leibniz Universität Hannover, [Journal for General Philosophy of Science](https://sci-hub.se/10.1007/s10838-019-09484-4) — «These com-plexities call for more empirical work, rather than abandoning the criteria. Overall, in their critical approach it seems that the authors too easily dismiss both the search for criteria and the potential of existing criteria for identifying NID.», «The second part of the book and its positive approach are a recommended read for someone who is in search for an introduction to, or an overview of the problems connected to the commercialization of science, the role of values in science, and epistemic trust in science.», «While we agree that it is important to discuss the issues they raise in Chapters 7–10, de Melo-Martín and Intemann do not make it clear how exactly these are related to dealing with the consequences of NID. For example, even if we manage to increase public trust in science, as long as the public cannot distinguish appro-priate mainstream positions from problematic dissent, how does this avoid the damage caused by NID?», «More generally speaking, as one of the pillars of the overall argument, the authors’ positive approach seems to be too broad to really be able to hit the target.», «Furthermore, if we are interested in promoting warranted trust in science there has to be a way of assessing who is trustworthy in the scientific community. However, this implies that we need criteria for evaluating trustworthiness, but such criteria would have to suffer from similar shortcomings as the criteria for NID evaluated by de Melo-Martín and Intemann», «The Fight Against Doubt is a valuable contribution to a topic of major social relevance. The argument defended presents a dissenting voice about what is seen as a consensus view—that problematic dissent has to be actively exposed in order to be less damaging.»

John Dupré, University of Exeter, [Philosophy of Science](https://ore.exeter.ac.uk/repository/bitstream/handle/10871/123866/de%20Melo-Martin%20and%20Intemann.pdf) — «This excellent book by Inmaculada de Melo-Martín and Kristen Intemann shows how much is not only wrong but even dangerous about this commonpicture.», «While, as I have noted, de Melo-Martínand Intemann do not wish to deny that there is NID, and that it is a bad thing,they generally downplay its importance in explaining the failures of policy.», «The second point should also, perhaps, be obvious but definitely bears re-emphasis and elaboration. Differences in policy choice do not merely or even mainly reflect differences in scientific opinion but rather different values. Totake a fairly extreme case, catastrophic climate change in 100 years’time isonly a problem if you think that we have some ethical responsibility for futuregenerations.», «The book leaves me with one rather dark reservation. It is that the argu-ment about trust seems—in a sense that is in no way critical—rather old-fashioned. I am writing this 2 days after my country, the (just barely) UnitedKingdom, followed the Unites States in appointing (at least we did not electhim) a notorious liar as our political leader.», «In summary, de Melo-Martín and Intemann have provided an invaluableanalysis of the failure of the public to accept the overwhelming consensus of experts and rightly warned us against attaching too much of the blame forthis to dissenting voices.», «They also do a great service in pointing out the dan-gers, not merely intellectual, of overestimating the role of scientific findings in the formation of policy. And they are surely right that the lack of trust inscientists is a crucial part of the explanation of the problem.», «Although theyare right, too, that there are aspects of science that go some way to explainthis lack of trust, and they make a number of sensible suggestions about howtrust might be restored, I fear that the problem may be more deeply rooted inthe contemporary Zeitgeist than they allow. I hope I am wrong»

[REVIEW_PERSONAL_COMMENTS] Не согласен, что приведённые в примере взгляды, что мы не несём ответственности перед будущими поколениями, могут быть реальной причиной климатического дениализма, поскольку не думаю, что количество носителей таких взглядов велико. Полагаю, что пример неудачен.

Katherine Furman, University College Cork, [British Journal for the Philosophy of Science](https://www.thebsps.org/reviewofbooks/furman-on-de-melo-martin-intemann/) — «Immaculada de Melo-Martín and Kristen Intemann’s The Fight against Doubt provides a clearly written and insightful contribution to this debate, with many interesting examples to help the discussion along», «De Melo-Martín and Intemann consider a number of strategies for dealing with NID—such as excluding bad faith disagreement or excluding those who lack appropriate scientific credentials—but none successfully exclude inappropriate dissent while leaving useful scientific debate intact. Perhaps this inability to generate a set of principles to regulate scientific dissent should not be surprising», «I suspect that de Melo-Martín and Intemann underestimate the hardness of the problem, however. It isn’t just that values are fully integrated into the production of science or that the scientists might not be aware of their values, both of which are hard problems; it’s also that even being able to identify value judgements where they occur requires considerable technical expertise, effectively excluding laypeople.», «Thus the values embedded in much of the scientific enterprise are effectively invisible to ordinary members of the public, and not readily explainable to them. This knocks out a number of de Melo-Martín and Intemann’s suggestions, such as increasing both transparency and avenues for public criticism.», «The Fight against Doubt does not offer a resolution to the problem so much as it opens up space for new ways of thinking about what to do next. This is a valuable contribution.»

[REVIEW_RETELLING] M.ª de los Ángeles Pérez del Amo, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, [Revista de la Sociedad de Lógica, Metodología y Filosofía de la Ciencia en España](https://www.solofici.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/Revista-de-la-Sociedad-de-Lo%CC%81gica-Metodologi%CC%81a-y-Filosofi%CC%81a-de-la-Ciencia-en-Espan%CC%83a-especial-filosofi%CC%81a-en-tiempos-de-pandemia-enero-2021.pdf#page=85) — « De esta forma, las escritoras han logrado exponer de un modo crítico y fundamenta-do una parte de la realidad científica y social en la que en pocas ocasiones solemos detenernos, permitiendo que salga a la luz un escrito como el que venimos a abordar.», «De este modo, lo que encontramos en el escrito es una dedicada y amplia exposición que tiene en cuenta multitud de fac-tores y puntos de vista, los cuales son analizados de forma detallada, logrando poner a prueba algunos de los testimonios o teorías que hasta el momento daban o intentaban dar una explicación para este tipo de fenó-menos.»

[BOOK_OR_AUTHOR_OR_CONCEPT_CRITICISM] Jesús Pedro Zamora Bonilla, Dpto. de Lógica, Historia y Filosofía de la Ciencia (UNED), [Theoria](http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/16974/1/def_21298_Zamora_Theoria35-1.pdf) — «The Fight against Doubt provides a useful description, with excellent detail and rigor, of an impressive number of examples of scientific dissent producing (or related to) some so-cially harmful consequences. Moreover, the authors clearly present a number of arguments to dismantle some deeply entrenched ideas about scientific dissent. This is, surely, the most interesting contribution of de Melo-Martín and Intemann: a critique of the traditional idea that “normatively inappropriate (scientific) dissent” (NID) is relatively easy to iden-tify, both in its elements and in its causes and consequences, and hence, relatively easy to deal with. The authors very convincingly show the opposite.», «My main criticism to this part of the book is that it seems to depend too much on the assumption that the existence (and evaluation) of “normatively inappropriate dissent” di-rectly depends on our having a set of sufficient and necessary criteria to identify it.», «It is not clear that having clear universal rules for identifying NIDs will improve this social navigation, as compared to our conventional appraisal of scientific disagreement, using contextual criteria that may not be generalized across NIDs», «In this scenario, the recommendation of “take values into account” does not contribute much: values are already at work in the conflict between science and the public and the books provide no recipe to disentangle them.», «I can’t help the impression that the authors are implicitly assuming here something like the so-called deficit model in science communica-tion. NIDs would cause a gap between the science and the public. If NID could be weeded out of science, trust would reappear. I just simply wonder why.»

[REVIEW_SMASHER] Michael Lissack, American Society for Cybernetics, Marblehead; Tongji University, Shanghai, [Metascience](https://sci-hub.se/10.1007/s11016-019-00448-4) — «That pair of reactions both highlights what the book is about and illustrates the inadequacy of philosophi-cal “solutions” to a public policy problem—the loss of confidence in science», «The general public and the policymak-ers question whether the perspective of the scientists is the appropriate perspective to take to the problem at hand. Instead, they want to explore how implementation might work, what its costs and tradeoffs might be, and what benefits may result when. Nowhere in the 200+ pages of Melo-Martin and Intemann’s work is that frame on the problem articulated», «They are on the right track but do not, in my view, go far enough.», «Trust in scientists to appropriately “decide” public policy is, how-ever, something quite different. The media and the science community twist the pub-lic skepticism about “appropriateness” into an expressed perception of something else: “limited public trust in the knowledge and understanding of scientists in areas directly relevant to their expertise.” (Funk 2017) Scientists and philosophers of sci-ence, such as Melo-Martin and Intemann, react badly when exposed to the twist.», «Jumping to values misses the point. Policies are not about how ideas are viewed; they are about how ideas are implemented.», «Again, this idea is noted by the authors—“how to weigh competing goods when they conflict” — and then overlooked. They seem to believe that the policymak-ers are more concerned with ideas than consequences. It is, in my opinion, a mis-taken belief. On that belief, the book fails to make a convincing argument.», «What Melo-Martin and Intemann miss is that the question is seldom “is policy x justified?” but rather, “how might we implement program y in an appropriate man-ner?” Scientific evidence and scientific advocacy may highlight a problem on which policymakers must focus, but it is rare when that same evidence and advocacy can define appropriate implementation efforts or illuminate the tradeoffs in costs and benefits among varying suggested “answers.”», «The problem Melo-Martin and Intemann write about in the end is an illu-sion (Pew Research Center 2018, 2019b). The public does not distrust either science or scientists. You cannot bridge a gap between scientists and the public that does not really exist.», «The authors do a fine job of articulating their point within the artificially constrained context they have self-defined. When one adjusts that context to the “real world,” there is no there there.», «As second-order cybernetics reminds us, context matters. In the end, the book illus-trates the limitations of taking purely a philosophical approach in analyzing policy choices. Lipman is right, “language is vague,” for a reason.»

Erin J. Nash, University of New South Wales, Sydney; Durham University, Durham, [Science](https://blogs.sciencemag.org/books/2018/08/21/the-fight-against-doubt/) — «Here, they also maintain that some responses to dissent are not only ineffective but can backfire, lending more credibility, rather than less, to dissenters’ views—another observation with which I agree. However, I remain un-convinced that this is generally the case. As I argued earlier this year, there are many examples in which problematic scientific dissent has been accurately identified and when choices about how to deal with it have been both effective and ethically justifiable», «Moreover, finite resources demand that scientists, editors, journalists, and other com-municators make judgments about which speech to prioritize. Where such decisions are inescapable, or shouldn’t be avoided be-cause of professional and moral obligations, the authors’ suggestion that we shift away from a focus on dissenting speech acts and communicative ethics is not appropriate.», «The authors’ attention to scientific practice, and to the social and institutional factors that affect the conduct of science, such as its in-creasing commercialization, are the book’s greatest strengths. But the reader might rightly be skeptical of their claim that pub-lic doubt about the trustworthiness of sci-entists is often fair.», «When gatekeepers don’t communicate evidence of a scientific community’s trustworthi-ness, or represent it with integrity, scientists’ initiatives won’t be effec-tive. The key weakness of this book is that it doesn’t fully account for such power dynamics or take into consid-eration the responsibilities of other actors at important nodes within public knowledge systems.», «De Melo-Martín and Intemann’s other main proposal to combat problematic dissent is to shift the focus of policy discussions from de-bating the truth of scientific claims to discussing the values that are at stake. This is good advice, but it’s worth keeping in mind that some conversations will inevitably loop back to factual questions. As is true about the limits of science, va lues can only take us so far.», «That de Melo-Martín and Intemann share the values and concerns of many of those engaged in this debate but disagree over the best way to mitigate problematic scientific dissent is an important reason to engage with The Fight Against Doubt. Its focus on a different aspect of the mecha-nisms at work—the qualities of the “soil,” rather than the mere existence of “seeds of doubt” — makes this a valuable book.»

[NO_SCEDRECO] -->
1. de Melo-Martín Inmaculada, Intemann Kristen K. — The Fight Against Doubt꞉ How to Bridge the Gap Between Scientists and the Public (OUP, 2018).pdf

<a id="Основные-разновидности-дениализма"></a>
### Основные разновидности дениализма

<!--- [INFO] Не нашёл информацию об образовании Гранта. Выше категории Gr поставить его не могу.

[ADDITIONAL_READING] Massimo Pigliucci — Nonsense on stilts: how to tell science from bunk

[NO_PDF] -->
1. [Grant John](http://www.sf-encyclopedia.com/entry/grant_john) — Denying Science. Conspiracy Theories, Media Distortions, and the War Against Reality (Prometheus Books, 2011).epub

<a id="Психология-веры-в-ненаучную-ерунду"></a>
### Психология веры в ненаучную ерунду

<!--- [ACADEMIC_DEGREE] [Kailas publishing house](https://kailas.es/autores-kailas/ramon-nogueras.html) — «Ramón Nogueras es Licenciado en Psicología por la Universidad de Granada (2001) y máster en Dirección de Recursos Humanos por la Fundación ESNA (2003). Ha trabajado como psicólogo en consulta privada, como consultor y formador en empresas y como docente universitario en psicología de las organizaciones. Desde hace más de una década se dedica a la divulgación de la psicología, tratando de transmitir lo apasionante que es esta ciencia, así como de informar de la enorme cantidad de fraude y pseudociencia que hay en torno a la misma.»

[CRIM_SPEAKER] [TEDx Madrid](http://www.tedxmadrid.com/ponentes-2018/ramon-nogueras/)

[REVIEW_CHECK] 2021-7-21

[NO_REVIEW]

[N/ProM]

[NO_SCEDRECO]

-->
1. Nogueras Ramón — Por qué creemos en mierdas. Cómo nos engañamos a nosotros mismos (Kailas, 2020).pdf

<a id="Руководства-по-научному-скептицизму"></a>
### Руководства по научному скептицизму

<!--- [INFO] Стивен Новелла — MD, доктор медицины; Кара, научный коммуникатор, согласно собственному сайту, PhD в клинической философии — https://www.carasantamaria.com/about/ ; Бернштейн — бакалавр, https://legacy.theskepticsguide.org/about/evan-bernstein ; об учёных званиях Джея и Боба не нашёл ничего — https://www.theskepticsguide.org/about

[ADDITIONAL_READING] Robert Todd Caroll — «The Sceptic’s Dictionary»
-->
1. [Novella Steven](https://medicine.yale.edu/profile/steven_novella/), Novella Bob, Cara Santa Maria, Novella Jay, Bernstein Evan — The Skeptics’ Guide to the Universe (Hodder & Stoughton, 2019).epub

<a id="Теории-заговора"></a>
### Теории заговора

<a id="Психология-веры-в-теории-заговора"></a>
#### Психология веры в теории заговора

1. [Бразертон Роб](https://barnard.edu/profiles/rob-brotherton) — Недоверчивые умы. Чем нас привлекают теории заговоров (Альпина Диджитал, 2015).pdf

<a id="Образ-науки"></a>
## Образ науки

<a id="Ироническое-представление-образа-науки"></a>
### Ироническое представление образа науки

<!--- [INFO] Тарасевич — научный журналист. Работал редактором отдела науки в «Учительской газете», возглавлял отдел науки «Русского репортёра», основал журнал «Кот Шрёдингера». Сведений об учёных званиях не нашёл, но проходит в Кристиноград как научный журналист или профессионал. -->
1. [Тарасевич Григорий Витальевич](https://lib.esstu.ru/cgi-bin/irbis64r_12/cgiirbis_64.exe?LNG=en&Z21ID=&I21DBN=MAPC&P21DBN=MAPC&S21STN=1&S21REF=10&S21FMT=fullwebr&C21COM=S&S21CNR=b.%20font%20color=red20/font.%20/b&S21P01=0&S21P02=1&S21P03=A=&S21STR=%D0%A2%D0%B0%D1%80%D0%B0%D1%81%D0%B5%D0%B2%D0%B8%D1%87,%20%D0%93%D1%80%D0%B8%D0%B3%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%B8%D0%B9) — О науке без звериной серьёзности (Эксмо, 2018).pdf

<a id="Неверные-представления-о-науке"></a>
### Неверные представления о науке

<a id="Неверные-представления-о-науке-и-естественнонаучные-заблуждения"></a>
#### Неверные представления о науке и естественнонаучные заблуждения

<!--- [NOTE] 3 части книги посвящены неверным представлениям о науке, одна — естественнонаучным заблуждениям 

[ACADEMIC_DEGREE] «He earned Ph.D. in biology and qualified as a professor in the history of science.» — https://library.cshl.edu/oralhistory/speaker/ernst-peter-fischer/ 

[BOOK_SERIES] Universum
-->
1. Фишер Эрнст Петер — Растут ли волосы у покойника？ Мифы современной науки (БИНОМ. Лаборатория знаний, 2015).pdf

<a id="Общественное-восприятие-науки"></a>
## Общественное восприятие науки

<a id="Отклонение-научной-культуры-западным-обществом"></a>
### Отклонение научной культуры западным обществом

<!--- [ACADEMIC_DEGREE] [Universidad Carlos III de Madrid, CV](https://portal.uc3m.es/portal/page/portal/instituto_cultura_tecnologia_miguel_unamuno/miembros/CV_Carlos_Elias/CurriculonormalizadoabreviadoCarlosEl%EDas%20(InstitutoCultu.pdf) — «Universidad de La Laguna — Licenciado en Ciencias Químicas (especialidad: Fundamental); Licenciado en Ciencias de la Información (especialidad: Periodismo); Doctorado por la Universidad de La Laguna. Suficiencia investigadora en los programas de doctorado: “Hacia un periodismo de calidad” y “Química Inorgánica Avanzada”. Tesis: “Flujos de información entre científicos y prensa”; Premio Extraordinario de Doctorado en Ciencias Sociales»

[CRIM_OFFENSIVE] «The problem lies not with them (mental disorders have always been present, even in academia) but with the university as an institution, considering them seriously» Не встречал множественных случаев языка вражды в книге, почему категория не занижена

[REVIEW_CHECK] 2021-6-15

[POSITIVE_OR_NEUTRAL_REVIEW][REVIEW_ORG] Rafael Sala Mayato, Profesor titular de Física Fundamental de la Universidad de La Laguna, [La Fundación para el Conocimiento madri+d](https://www.madrimasd.org/cultura-cientifica/ciencia-cultura/ensayo/ciencia-contra-las-cuerdas-declive-cultura-cientifica-en-era-las-fake-news) — «La parte más polémica del libro plantea que Occidente -las universidades europeas y americanasfascinadas por los estudios culturales y por los filósofos postmodernoscritican a la ciencia y la tecnología como lo hacían los jesuitas y el clero español en la época de la Contrarreforma.», «El libro es ameno, muy ágil (con lenguaje divulgativo, aunque con referencias y gráficas) y, sobre todo, valiente y diferente, inusual entre lo que suelen publicar académicos españoles. Es un libro a contracorriente.», «Science on the Ropes es un libro de obligada lectura para todos los académicos preocupados por la crisis de vocaciones STEM, la historia de la ciencia, de los medios de comunicación o de la cultura con mayúsculas que, como reclama Elías, si no incluye la ciencia, no es cultura como tal.»

[REVIEW_IN_MEDIA] José Manuel Chillón, Universidad de Valladolid, [Investigación y Ciencia](https://www.investigacionyciencia.es/files/54100.pdf) — «Lo que en mi opinión debe discutirse con el autor de este excepcional trabajo de investigación es por qué, aun coincidien-do con su tesis, reafirmándonos en su aná-lisis cultural (…) opta por un tono de enfrentamiento entre las ciencias humanas y las naturales —con la acrítica aceptación de que el método científico experimental goza del patrimonio de la verdad— y por afirmaciones excesivas y poco fundadas que quizá rebajen el alto nivel investigador de su trabajo», «Para superar el tono de enfrentamiento y las aseveraciones inveraces que empa-ñan el resultado investigador, resulta muy apreciable la última parte del libro, en la que el autor modera sus posiciones inicia-les hacia un punto de encuentro. A la vez, reclama un escrupuloso trabajo científico ajustado al método estrictamente mate-mático-racional, y reconoce la importancia que para las ciencias naturales tienen las ciencias humanas y viceversa.», «En definitiva, debo recomendar este libro por su potencia investigadora, su en-comiable acopio documental y su convic-ción y pasión racional, no sin reconocer, a la vez, que todas esas fortalezas pueden sostenerse desde un tono más dialogante, menos cientificista y, por tanto, más cien-tífico todavía.»

Francisco López-Cantos, University of Jaume I, Castellón de la Plana, Spain, [Metascience](https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11016-021-00619-2) — «However, this is a great virtue of Science on the Ropes, which tackles the impending destruction of Western culture with strong and explicit arguments from an integrative perspective typical of an Enlightenment scientist. It does so with courage and without concessions.»

[NO_SCEDRECO] -->
1. Elías Perez Carlos — Science on the Ropes. Decline of Scientific Culture in the Era of Fake News (Springer, 2019).pdf

<a id="Причины-научной-безграмотности-общества"></a>
### Причины научной безграмотности общества

<a id="HC-6"></a>
#### HC

<!--- [JOURNALISM_SCIENCE_DEGREE] Mooney, [The Washington Post](https://www.washingtonpost.com/people/chris-mooney/) — «Chris Mooney writes about energy and the environment at The Washington Post. He previously worked at Mother Jones, where he wrote about science and the environment and hosted a weekly podcast. Mooney spent a decade before that as a freelance writer, podcaster and speaker, with his work appearing in Wired, Harper’s, Slate, the Los Angeles Times and the Boston Globe, to name a few.», «2020 Pulitzer Prize, explanatory reporting.» (премия получена намного позднее написания «Unscientific America»)

Kirshenbaum, [Personal site](https://www.sherilkirshenbaum.com/) — «Sheril has been featured in documentary films about science and society and her writing appears in publications such as Bloomberg and The Atlantic, frequently covering topics from climate change to parenthood. Her work has been published in scientific journals including Science and Nature and she is featured in the anthology The Best American Science Writing 2010.»

[CRIM_SPEAKER] Mooney, [The Washington Post](https://www.washingtonpost.com/people/chris-mooney/) — «Mooney spent a decade before that as a freelance writer, podcaster and speaker»

Kirshenbaum, [Personal site](https://www.sherilkirshenbaum.com) — «She speaks internationally about science communication and has appeared as a thought leader at events like TEDGlobal and Ciudad de las Ideas.»

[NO_SCEDRECO][CRIM_SOURCES_QUALITY]

[REVIEW_CHECK] 2021-6-18

[POSITIVE_OR_NEUTRAL_REVIEW] David J. Tenenbaum, University of Wisconsin-Madison, [Science Communication](https://sci-hub.se/10.1177/1075547009359802) — «Instead, science journalist Chris Mooney, author of The Republican War on Science, and Sheril Kirshenbaum, a marine biologist who has worked in the Senate policy mill, rotate the muzzle of the blame cannon in the opposite direction.»

Julie Palakovich Carr, American Institute of Biological Science, [Limnology and Oceanography Bulletin](https://www.aslo.org/wp-content/uploads/10_v19_i1.pdf#page=25) — «Chris Mooney and Sheril Kirshenbaum believe that yesterday was the day for this revolution to begin. If you are ready to join, read “Unscientific American: How Scientific Illiteracy Threatens Our Future.” It’s perfect reading material for a graduate student journal club, an undergraduate science writing course, or for a researcher who is dissatisfied with the current system.»

[REVIEW_ONE_PAGE] Guy D. Foulkes, MD, OrthoGeorgia, Macon, [The Journal of Hand Surgery](https://sci-hub.se/10.1016/J.JHSA.2010.12.031) — «Unscientific Americais well re-searched, as might be expected from a journalist andscientist, and the only blemishes, in this reviewer’sopinion, are the authors’ assumptions about globalwarming and the unnecessary descent into politicalcommentary on the Bush versus Obama administra-tions. An excellent gift for the hand surgeon’s humanistcolleague, spouse, or child!»

[REVIEW_PERSONAL_COMMENTS] «Does science illiteracy really endanger our country…» — Койн в каких-то экономических категориях рассуждает, а не о влиянии неграмотности на отдельных людей

«Do they really think that if Dawkins had not written…» — дамский аргумент от Койна

«What good is producing more “renaissance scientists” if nobody listens to them?» — похоже на strawman от Койна; где Муни и Киршенбаум предлагают “renaissance scientists”?

[BOOK_OR_AUTHOR_OR_CONCEPT_CRITICISM][REVIEW_ONE_PAGE][REVIEW_IN_SCIENCE_MEDIA] Jim Giles, New Scientist correspondent, [New Scientist](https://sci-hub.se/10.1016/S0262-4079(09)62105-9) — «But Mooney and Kirshenbaum don’t seem to have asked themselves the “why science?” question. The book is infused with a sense that science does not just deserve a place at the top table of politics, it is entitled to one. When discussing the failure of a campaign to get last year’s US presidential candidates to attend a debate on science, for example, the authors accuse the media of ignoring a story that was “news by any reasonable standard”. I’m not sure that many people outside the world of science would agree. Worthy is not the same as newsworthy.», «By looking only at science, Unscientific America misses the big picture. Yes, the latest findings on climate change and other areas of science need to be heard on Capitol Hill and in the media. But so does sound reasoning about America’s absurd prison policy or the country’s counterproductive efforts to combat drug use.», «Political and media discussions of many complex issues are, unfortunately, dominated by vested interests and prejudice rather than rational argument. The problem here is not with public engagement in science – it is with public engagement.», «Somewhere in all this are the ingredients for real change. Perhaps they can be melded into a genuine reform movement. And it’s real reform of our public debates, not just more accurate films or media-savvy scientists, that will finally get people engaged with science.»

[REVIEW_IN_SCIENCE_MEDIA][REVIEW_SMASHER] Jon D. Miller, [American Scientist](https://www.americanscientist.org/article/a-thin-broth) — «I wanted to like Unscientific America, but after reading it carefully twice (there are only 132 pages of text), I’m afraid I have to report that it is, at best, a thin and unsatisfying broth.», «But rather than engaging in the serious discussion already under way, Mooney and Kirshenbaum offer a media-centric diagnosis of the problem, and they ultimately fail to present any feasible set of suggestions for addressing it.», «The first chapter is indicative of the level of analysis found throughout the book. “Why Pluto Matters” opens with a description of some of the journalistic chatter about whether or not Pluto should be classified as a planet.», «At this point, I began to worry that we were not thinking about the same problem. I’ve been doing national surveys of American attitudes about science and technology for 30 years, and I can’t recall a single respondent ever mentioning the classification of Pluto as an issue of concern. The basic problem is that Mooney and Kirshenbaum’s understanding of the public’s attitudes is based substantially on what they read and hear in the media.», «In chapter 3, the authors take a detour into the history of the problem and, in doing so, display a shockingly shallow understanding of it. Their opening declaration, “The modern history of American science begins with World War II,” is a good journalistic sentence—short and punchy—but wrong.», «But the book makes no mention of Vannevar Bush’s lasting contribution, which was the organization of scientific talent and resources into functioning national laboratories that survived the war years and the early development of grant mechanisms to provide resources to scientists in universities without the heavy hand of governmental bureaucracy. He didn’t envision the science; he created the organizations that supported the science. The authors go on to dispense with the effect of the Soviet launch of Sputnik in less than two pages.», «Mooney and Kirshenbaum appear not to recognize that the dismissal of scientific literacy as a “deficit model” is no more than an extension of the postmodernist argument.», «Although they offer some interesting anecdotes, the authors don’t come to grips with the impact of the information revolution on the economic viability of traditional media.», «It is clear that they yearn both for more science writing jobs and for the advantages of the Internet, but they never suggest any economic model to get there. In the end, Mooney and Kirshenbaum recommend foundation support for the creation of “science ambassadors,” who would be drawn from the ranks of those with recent graduate degrees in science and currently unemployed science writers. This is a band-aid solution for a systemic problem.», «Many thoughtful reports, including the National Research Council’s Learning Science in Informal Environments (2009), point to the inherent linkage between formal learning and the ability of adults to find and make sense of scientific information throughout life. But Mooney and Kirshenbaum dismiss precollege science as “textbook science,” and they completely ignore the substantial impact of college science courses on the development of adult scientific literacy in the United States.», «The authors deserve credit for highlighting the issue of scientific illiteracy. However, readers in search of serious discussion of the problem will find little to nourish them in this light and journalistic treatment.»

[REVIEW_PERSONAL_COMMENTS] «It was C. P. Snow who argued that an educated person should know both the second law of thermodynamics and the works of Shakespeare» — Зачем? Какая польза от второго закона термодинамики и Шекспира?

[CRIM_OFFENSIVE] «I’m afraid I have to report that it is, at best, a thin and unsatisfying broth.»

[REVIEW_SMASHER] Jerry Coyne, Department of Ecology and Evolution, University of Chicago, [Science](https://sci-hub.se/10.1126/science.1179131) — «But when Mooney and Kirshenbaum venture beyond such well-known data, their enterprise dissolves. Ironi-cally for a book that aims to improve science literacy, Unscientific America is woefully short of evidence to support its claims. Does science illiteracy really endanger our country or our standard of living?», «Mooney and Kirshenbaum also fail to sup-port their contention that the knowledge gap between scientists and the public is increas-ing. In fact, the only relevant statistic they provide shows no such thing: the proportion of Americans who believe that humans were created instead of evolved has not budged for three decades.», «Instead of data, Mooney and Kirshenbaum rely on anecdotes.», «Other data contradict Mooney and Kir-shenbaum’s claim that American ignorance of scientific issues reveals a failure of out-reach.», «All this suggests that the problem of an “unscien-tifi c America” may be far more complex than the authors let on. The public’s reluctance to accept scientifi c facts may refl ect not just a lack of exposure but a willful evasion of facts due to conflicting economic agendas (e.g., the case of global warming), personal agen-das (vaccines), or religious agendas.», «if vocal atheists like Richard Dawkins would just keep quiet about religion, a sanction that the authors don’t impose on publicly religious scientists such as Francis Collins. Unfortu-nately, Mooney and Kirshenbaum provide no evidence that this prescription would work.», «Do they really think that if Dawkins had not written The God Delusion (2), Americans would wholeheartedly embrace evolution and vaccination and fi nally recognize the threat of global warming?», «Mooney and Kirshenbaum’s other pro-posed solution, training scientists in public outreach, does seem like a good idea, though hardly a novel one», «But the authors fail to tell us how such train-ing should be implemented and, more important, why (given the complex nexus of religious, political, and edu-cational issues that affect the acceptance of science) more outreach is the best solution—or even an effective solution. What good is producing more “renaissance scientists” if nobody listens to them?», «But fi guring out where and how to intervene will take a lot more work than the shallow and unrefl ective analysis of Unscientific America.»

[REVIEW_SMASHER] David Colquhoun, professor of pharmacology, University College London, [BMJ](http://www.dcscience.net/Colquhoun_M%26K_review_BMJ_2009.pdf) — «The problem is that they propose no good solutions and some bad ones. The aims are worthy, but sometimes the book reads like an overlong and somewhat condescending whine about why science and scientists are not sufficiently appreciated», «I simply don’t think it’s true that the public is not interested in science, nor that people can’t understand it at a level that is sufficient to be useful. The disastrous fall in vaccination against measles, mumps, and rubella can be attributed more to talk show presenters and airheaded celebrities than to lack of interest among the public.», «There is one problem that Mooney and Kirshenbaum don’t talk about at all, yet it seems to me to be one of the biggest problems in science communication: it isn’t lack of interest on the part of the public, nor even lack of understanding, but lack of trust.», «Mooney and Kirshenbaum suggest that the solution is to create a “cadre of communication and outreach experts.” I don’t think this would work. Such people would, by and large, be outsiders, writing uncritical paeans, dictated by big name scientists. A new cadre of PR hangers on does not sound like a great idea.», «The two chapters that I looked forward to reading, on religion and that entitled “The bloggers cannot save us,” proved deeply disappointing. The authors are firmly in the camp of what Richard Dawkins called the “Neville Chamberlain school of evolutionists.”», «Mooney and Kirshenbaum are all for appeasement, but appeasement won’t work.», «I think Mooney and Kirshenbaum have it all wrong. They favour corporate communications, which are written by people outside science and which easily become mere PR machinery for individuals and institutions. uch blogs are rarely popular, and at their worst they threaten the honesty of science»

[CRIM_OFFENSIVE] «book reads like an overlong and somewhat condescending»

[REVIEW_PERSONAL_COMMENTS] Из книги мне показалось, что Муни/Киршенбаум имели в виду совсем не тех пиарщиков, о которых пишет Колкухоун

[REVIEW_NO_ACCESS] Rory Litwin, [Journal of Information Ethics](https://www.proquest.com/docview/1682425001)

Maurizio Melis, [Equilibri](https://www.rivisteweb.it/doi/10.1406/32758)

誠 三井, [中央公論](https://academic.microsoft.com/paper/165844736/related)

[N/JSc]

[AUTHOR_PROJECT] Киршенбаум — executive director of [Science Debate](https://sciencedebate.org/) — инициатива дебатов американских политиков по научным вопросам
-->
1. Mooney Chris, Kirshenbaum Sheril — Unscientific America. How Scientific Illiteracy Threatens Our Future (Basic Books, 2009).pdf

<a id="Ошибочные-идеи-в-науке"></a>
## Ошибочные идеи в науке

<!--- [BOOK_SERIES] Политех

[NO_SCANNED_PDF] -->
1. Брокман Джон (под редакцией) — Эта идея должна умереть. Научные теории, которые блокируют прогресс (АСТ, 2017).fb2

<a id="Паранаука"></a>
## Паранаука

<a id="Паранормальные-явления"></a>
### Паранормальные явления

<a id="Критическое-мышление-к-паранормальным-явлениям"></a>
#### Критическое мышление к паранормальным явлениям

<!--- [INFO] Смит — психолог, а не специалист в области методологии науки -->
1. [Смит Джонатан](https://scholar.google.co.uk/citations?user=-a4NjzsAAAAJ) — Псевдонаука и паранормальные явления. Критический взгляд (Альпина нон-фикшн, 2011).pdf

<a id="Объяснение-паранормальных-явлений"></a>
#### Объяснение паранормальных явлений

<!--- [BOOK_SERIES] Библиотека фонда Эволюция -->
1. Панчин Александр Юрьевич — Защита от тёмных искусств. Путеводитель по миру паранормальных явлений (Corpus, 2018).pdf

<a id="Распознавание-паранауки"></a>
### Распознавание паранауки

<a id="NR-41"></a>
#### NR

<a id="Агрессивный-скептицизм"></a>
##### Агрессивный скептицизм

<!--- [NOTE] Отсылки к источникам с оскорбительными материалами — Фрикопедию, Луркоморье («научное фричество»), Sektam.net.

«Более подробная критика работ Гаряева изложена в бюллетенях «В защиту науки», на форуме молекулярных биологов, юмористическом научно-популярном видео «Фрик-шоу» и в Интернет-энциклопедии «Луркоморье».», «http://www.sektam.net/forum/ «Светский частный информационный проект о критическом мышлении, деструктивных культах и психологических манипуляциях». Форум», «https://lurkmore.to/Научное_фричество http://www.freakopedia.ru Фрикопедия. Энциклопедия лженауки», «Фрик-Шоу (Электронный ресурс) // YouTube, Канал «Trash-Smash» // URL: Гаряев– https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wi6hj4gjOxo», «Фрик-Шоу (Электронный ресурс) // YouTube, Канал «TrashSmash» // URL: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WH3WEpDSQIY»

[BOOK_SERIES] Библиотека Гутенберга

[NO_PDF] -->
1. [Подымов Леонид Игоревич](https://elementy.ru/bookclub/author/5276230/leonid_podymov) — Псевдонаука. Разоблачение обмана и заблуждений (АСТ, Аванта, 2018).fb2

<a id="Советская-и-российская-наука"></a>
## Советская и российская наука

<a id="Неприглядные-реалии-советской-и-российской-науки"></a>
### Неприглядные реалии советской и российской науки

<!--- [ACADEMIC_DEGREE] [Археология.ру, автобиография](http://www.archaeology.ru/p15/t1496/index.html) — «В 1968 г. защитил кандидатскую диссертацию "Происхождение Донецкой катакомбной культуры".», «В 1993 г. защитил докторскую диссертацию по книге "Археологическая типология" в Институте истории материальной культуры РАН (единогласно).», «Высшая Антропологическая Школа Молдавии (после прочтенных мною в ней курсов лекций) присвоила мне звание доктора honoris causa»

[BOOK_SERIES] Библиотека журнала «Неприкосновенный запас»

[N/BioM]

[POSITIVE_OR_NEUTRAL_REVIEW] Щавелёв Сергей Павлович — «Но в целом — должен признать всякий непредубежденный читатель — автору удалось выстроить почти энциклопедическую панораму жизни и выживания сотрудников и академических, и университетских учре-ждений в постсоветской России.», «Дальше злопамятный Клейн делится собственным богатейшим опытом выживания в тоталитарном и авторитарном социумах», «Не буду лишать читателя, особенно молодого, удовольствия и пользы самому прочесть и примерить на себя эти многочисленные рецепты двоемыслия и криводушия. Ученым ведь ничто человеческое не чуждо. Обращу только внимание, что эта часть книжки– «Язык сфинксов, или Мысли между строк»– прямо проти-воречит пафосу всей книги– вылечить язвы российской науки, искоре-нить раболепие в новых поколениях исследователей», «Мне лично ближе заветы другого известного археолога и мыслителя, Александра Александровича Формозова (1928–2009), закатные книги которого похожи по своей тематике на обозреваемую мной сейчас [Ща-велев, 2017, с.345–364]. Формозов завещал нам не превращать жизнь в перманентную гражданскую войну, но всегда взвешивать меру жизнен-ных и профессиональных компромиссов.», «Автор этих строк, как и многие другие читатели книжки Клейна, могут поспорить со многими ее тезисами, усомниться в целом ряде его выводов. Скажем, тот несколько раз и вроде по делу осуждает, ко-гда первых лиц государства и вообще влиятельных персон приглашают в экспедиции ученых, научные и учебные заведения. (…) Если разобраться, то ничего плохого в этой вечной и всемирной практике нет. Наука существует в определенном социуме и от него неизбежно зависит. Без внешнего финансирования нигде и никогда ученые не просуществуют. Гении маргиналы вроде Григория Перельмана не в счет, погоды в академиях да университетах они не делают. (…) Тем паче, что и сам критик таковых контактов не избегает, иначе ему было бы нипочем не издать столько замечательных томов за последние годы.», «Более убедительны, на мой взгляд, наблюдения Л.С.Клейна над темой «Ученые как класс».», « Но моя задача другая – обратить внимание коллег ученых, прежде всего гуманитариев, особенно замордованных нынешними условиями и реформами науки да образования, на эту незаурядную книжку. Имейте ее в виду, укажите на нее своим ученикам. Ивы, и они от этого выиграют. Потому что итоговое впечатление от клейновских «Мук науки» у всех нас будет скорее оптимистическое.», «Такая смелая, местами эпатажная книжка, как рецензируемое издание, в приснопамятные времена тоталитаризма, да и авторитаризма советского вызвала бы на голову ее автора (и, тем более, рецензента) громы и молнии властей и сервильных коллег. А то, что сегодня читатели – и сами ученые, и руто, что сегодня читатели – и сами ученые, и ру-то, что сегодня читатели– и сами ученые, и ру-ководители науки– воспринимают ее спокойно, эдак снисходительно, это даже хорошо.»

[ADDITIONAL_READING] Формозов Александр Александрович — «Человек и наука: Из записей археолога»

Формозов Александр Александрович — «Рассказы об учёных»

Клейн Лев Самуилович — «Трудно быть Клейном»

Губарев Владимир Степанович — «Окна из будущего»

Губарев Владимир Степанович — «Убийство РАН: новейшая история науки в России»

[NO_SCEDRECO][NO_SOURCES] -->
1. Клейн Лев Самуилович — Муки науки꞉ учёный и власть, учёный и деньги, учёный и мораль (Новое литературное обозрение, 2017).pdf

<a id="Развал-российской-науки"></a>
### Развал российской науки

<a id="NR-42"></a>
#### NR

<a id="Издание-без-согласия-с-автором"></a>
##### Издание без согласия с автором

<!--- [INFO] Письмо Алфёрова — https://english.yale.edu/news/department-news/remembering-william-zinsser-1922-2015 . По состоянию на декабрь 2020 на сайте издательства книга значится как книга самого Алфёрова — https://web.archive.org/web/20201207152240/https://algoritm-kniga.ru/vlast-bez-mozgov-otdelenie-nauki-ot-gosudarstva.html 

[BOOK_SERIES] Политические тайны XXI века
-->
1. [Алфёров Жорес Иванович](https://etu.ru/ru/muzej/vydayushhiesya-uchenye/alferov-z-i) — Власть без мозгов, Отделение науки от государства (Алгоритм, 2012).pdf

<a id="Социология-науки"></a>
## Социология науки

<!--- [ACADEMIC_DEGREE] Gingras completed a doctorate in the History and Socio-politics of Science at the University of Montreal in 1984 — https://yvesgingras.uqam.ca/en/about-yves-gingras/biography/

[ACADEMIC_DEGREE_EDITOR] Кирчик Олеся Игоревна, PhD, Социологические науки — https://www.hse.ru/staff/kirtchik

[POSITIVE_OR_NEUTRAL_REVIEW][REVIEW_RETELLING] Кандидат философских наук, доцент Н. П. Кнэхт — https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/retsenziya-na-knigu-iva-zhengra-sotsiologiya-nauki

[REVIEW_RETELLING] Mehdi K. Benslimane, Université de Grenoble — https://journals.openedition.org/ress/3374 — «Disant ceci, Gingras omet de remarquer que les chercheurs qui publient leurs travaux dans des revues scientifiques à comité de lecture se soumettent, à leur tour, dans le cadre du développement de leurs carrières, au marché des postes et du capital(isme) matériel, et par conséquent au marché de l’évaluation et de la reconnaissance professionnelle.»

[REVIEW_RETELLING] Michaël Fortier, Étudiant à la maîtrise à l’Université de Sherbrooke — https://journals.openedition.org/lectures/10883 — «Plus de dix ans après la parution de numéros consacrés à L’Histoire des sciences1 et à La Philosophie des sciences2, la collection encyclopédique « Que sais-je ? » accueille enfin un ouvrage de synthèse qui présente les principaux acquis de la sociologie des sciences» — «Pour compléter le portrait, il aurait été intéressant d’accorder une plus grande importance aux principaux courants théoriques et méthodes en sociologie des sciences, plutôt que de s’en tenir à décrire ses objets d’étude, ses problématiques et ses résultats. Quoi qu’il en soit, cette lacune est compensée par des indications bibliographiques très riches qui sauront orienter le lecteur soucieux d’approfondir ses connaissances dans le domaine.»

[BOOK_OR_AUTHOR_OR_CONCEPT_CRITICISM] Thomas Vangeebergen, Université de Liège — https://orbi.uliege.be/bitstream/2268/163617/1/TVGB2014Rview_Gingras.pdf — «Assigning a central and specific standpoint to each era and according a dominating role to the historical context make the analytical framework unnecessarily rigid, whereas these themes are rather key threads beyond times and places. Besides, and this is undoubtedly more fundamental, this diachronic approach assumes the idea that some contexts favor the emergence of scientific activities more than others. Though he mentions nuances and counter-examples, the author always choses to explain rather than understand the events», «In this chapter, the author also proposes a very popperian version of scientific controversies, boiling down to argument contests, the outcomes of which are determined by the cognitive (theoretical and experimental) contingencies of the time.», «If we can fully subscribe to the will of interpretative pluralism recommended by the author (of which, to be true, he does not give us here a very convincing demonstration), we find once again a profund dissensus in his approach of sociology.», «Considering the tone as well as the 'factual' contents, we wonder who would benefit from this type of reading.», «Inevitably, all the author can do is pass over many important issues in silence» -->
1. Жэнгра Ив — Социология науки (Высшая Школа Экономики, 2017).djvu

<a id="История-роли-учёного-в-обществе"></a>
### История роли учёного в обществе

<!--- [INFO] Бэн-Дэвид — PhD в социологии

[BOOK_SUPPORT] Программа «Развитие социальных исследований образования в России» при участии Европейского университета в Санкт-Петербурге и при финансовой поддержке Фонда Спенсера.

[INFO] Книга не содержит информацию о рецензентах -->
1. [Бен-Дэвид Джозеф](https://sci-hub.se/https://www.jstor.org/stable/285035) — Роль учёного в обществе (Новое литературное обозрение, 2014).djvu

<a id="Философия-и-эпистемология-науки"></a>
## Философия и эпистемология науки

<!--- Рузавин Г. И., «[Философия науки](https://studref.com/483533/filosofiya/epistemologiya_nauki)» — «В современной философской литературе под эпистемологией чаще всего подразумевают теорию научного познания. Для обозначения общей теории познания нередко используют термин «гносеология». По мнению К. Поппера, эпистемология есть теория научного познания, «которая пытается объяснить статус науки и ее рост».» -->

<a id="Внутреннее-функционирование-механизмов-науки"></a>
### Внутреннее функционирование механизмов науки

<!--- Владимир Игоревич Пржиленский, Московский государственный юридический университет, [Философская мысль](https://e-notabene.ru/fr/article_267.html) — «Вопрос о том, чем отличается эпистемология от философии науки, на первый взгляд представляется достаточно простым. Эпистемология – это теория знания или теория познания, то есть теория, пусть и философская. Она занимается проблемами познания в целом, тогда как философия науки, это исследование отдельных наук, ориентированное на философское осмысление отдельных эпизодов научного поиска, рефлексия над основаниями данной науки и т.п.» -->

<!--- [BOOK_SERIES] Грандиозный мир -->
1. [Томпсон Мел](https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=kqYDuEAAAAAJ) — Философия науки (Фаир-Пресс, 2003).pdf

<a id="Научность-теорий"></a>
### Научность теорий

<!--- [ACADEMIC_DEGREE] [Институт философии РАН](https://iphras.ru/page26104614.htm) — «Доктор философских наук. Диссертация «Неклассическая модальная логика» защищена на философском факультете МГУ в 1975 г.»

[ACADEMIC_DEGREE_REVIEWERS] Доброхотов Александр Львович — [ВШЭ, CV](https://view.officeapps.live.com/op/view.aspx?src=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.hse.ru%2Fdata%2F2015%2F04%2F09%2F174150247235026%2F%25D0%25A0%25D0%25B5%25D0%25B7%25D1%258E%25D0%25BC%25D0%25B5-Engl..doc) — «1990: Doctoral dissertation ''The Category of Being in Ancient Philosophy of the Classical Period''»

Ивлев Юрий Васильевич — [Философский факультет МГУ](https://philos.msu.ru/node/75) — «доктор философских наук, докторская диссертация — "Содержательная семантика модальной логики" (1986)»

[BOOK_SUPPORT] Российский гуманитарный научный фонд

[ADDITIONAL_READING] Ивин — «Аргументация в процессах коммуникации. Pro et Contra», «Философское измерение истории», «Философское исследование науки»

Ивин и Никитина Ирина Петровна — «Философия науки. Учебное пособие»

[NO_SOURCES][NO_REVIEW] -->
1. Ивин Александр Архипович — Наука, паранаука и псевдонаука. От алхимии к химии, от астрологии к астрономии (Проспект, 2016).pdf

<a id="Научные-революции"></a>
### Научные революции

<a id="Научная-революция-в-биологической-систематике"></a>
#### Научная революция в биологической систематике

<!--- [INFO] Любарский — кандидат биологических наук, но не специалист в области методологии науки. Однако так как бо́льшая часть книги посвящена биологии, книге присваивается категория «Ri». -->
1. [Любарский Георгий Юрьевич](https://elementy.ru/bookclub/author/5273047/georgiy_yurevich_lyubarskiy) — Рождение науки. Аналитическая морфология, классификационная система, научный метод (ЯСК, 2015).pdf

<a id="Научный-метод"></a>
### Научный метод

<a id="NR-43"></a>
#### NR

<a id="Распространение-автором-теорий-заговора"></a>
##### Распространение автором теорий заговора

<!--- [INFO] «11 сентября — обман» — https://calvinism.ru/sep11.htm . -->
1. [Чащихин Устин Валерьевич](https://fedpress.ru/person/2425558) — Научный метод познания. Ключ к решению любых задач (Оргсервис, 2013).pdf

<a id="Процесс-научного-познания"></a>
### Процесс научного познания

<!--- [INFO] Мартин — химик, Инге — эпидемиолог. Посему категория снижена. 

[BOOK_ABBREVIATED_TRANSLATION]

[BOOK_SERIES] Переводная научно-популярная литература
-->
1. [Голдстейн Мартин](https://physicstoday.scitation.org/do/10.1063/PT.5.6105/full/), [Голдстейн Инге](https://ccceh.org/investigators/inge-goldstein-dph) — Как мы познаём. Исследование процесса научного познания (Знание, 1984).djvu

<a id="Парадоксы-процесса-научного-познания"></a>
#### Парадоксы процесса научного познания

<!--- [ACADEMIC_DEGREE] «После окончания университета Анатолий Константинович поступил в аспирантуру при кафедре диалектического и исторического материализма и под научным руководством профессора К.П. Ярошевского защитил в 1953 г. кандидатскую диссертацию «Революционный демократизм М.Е. Щедрина». После защиты диссертации он заведовал кафедрой диалектического материализма ТГУ (1954–1956 гг.), а затем кафедрой истории КПСС и философии в Томском медицинском институте (1958–1968 гг.). В 1970 г. он вновь возвращается в ТГУ и возглавляет кафедру философии.» https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/287453287.pdf#page=10

[BOOK_SERIES] Эврика

[NO_SOURCES] -->
1. Сухотин Анатолий Константинович — Парадоксы науки (Молодая гвардия, 1978).pdf

<a id="Сравнительная-эпистемология"></a>
### Сравнительная эпистемология

<a id="Теория-стиля-мышления-и-мыслительного-коллектива"></a>
#### Теория стиля мышления и мыслительного коллектива

<!--- [BOOK_SUPPORT] Программа Центрально-Европейского Университета «Translation Project» при поддержке Института «Открытое общество»

[INFO] Флек — учёный-микробиолог, не имел философского образования. Однако ему было посвящено множество научных работ — https://sci-hub.se/https://www.jstor.org/stable/285293 , https://sci-hub.se/https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11191-014-9723-9 . Возможно, имеет смысл дать книге первую категорию.

[INFO] Редактор — Порус Владимир Натанович, доктор философских наук — https://www.hse.ru/org/persons/66484

[ADDITIONAL_READING] Майкл Поланьи — «Личностное знание»

Michael Polanyi — «The Tacit Dimension»

Dolby R. G. A. — Uncertain Knowledge: An Image of Science for a Changing World

[NOTE_FULL_NAME] Флек Людвик — Возникновение и развитие научного факта. Введение в теорию стиля мышления и мыслительного коллектива (Идея-Пресс, Дом интеллектуальной книги, 1999)
-->
1. [Флек Людвик](https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/fleck/) — Возникновение и развитие научного факта (Идея-Пресс, 1999).djvu

<a id="Философия-математики-механики-и-физики"></a>
### Философия математики, механики и физики

1. [Пуанкаре Жюль Анри](http://eqworld.ipmnet.ru/ru/education/scientists/poincare.htm) — О науке. Наука и гипотеза. Ценность науки. Наука и метод. Последние мысли (Наука, 1990).pdf

<a id="Элегантные-научные-теории"></a>
## Элегантные научные теории

<!--- [NO_ACADEMIC_DEGREE] Судя по Википедии, Брокман — литературный агент, не имеющий учёных званий — https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Brockman_(literary_agent) . Но, так как печатается не он сам, а учёные, категория «Is».

[Автор](https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2012/jan/08/john-brockman-edge-interview-john-naughton)

[BOOK_SERIES] Universum

[AUTHOR_PROJECT] Edge.org — собрание интеллектуалов — https://www.edge.org/about-edgeorg -->
1. Брокман Джон (под редакцией) — Теории всего на свете (БИНОМ. Лаборатория знаний, 2015).pdf

<a id="Нейронауки"></a>
# Нейронауки

<!--- [Автор](https://www.bcu.ac.uk/social-sciences/about-us/staff/criminology-and-sociology/dean-burnett)

[NO_PDF] -->
1. Бернетт Дин — Идиотский бесценный мозг. Как мы поддаёмся на все уловки и хитрости нашего мозга (Издательство «Э», 2017).fb2
<!--- [N/JSc]

[POSITIVE_OR_NEUTRAL_REVIEW][REVIEW_IN_MEDIA] Анна Петренко, [Биомолекула](https://biomolecula.ru/articles/asia-kazantseva-mozg-materialen-o-polze-tomografa-transkranialnogo-stimuliatora-i-kletok-ulitki-dlia-ponimaniia-chelovecheskogo-povedeniia-retsenziia-1) — «Главное достоинство книги, на взгляд рецензента, — это то, что она показывает пластичность — но не мозга, как вы могли подумать, а науки.», «Однако есть и минус: если это не первая ваша книга по нейробиологии, то окажется, что вы наверняка уже слышали о части описываемых случаев с пациентами, потому что они считаются «классическими» и многократно упомянуты в других публикациях.», «Еще одна особенность книги — это то, что Ася постоянно ведет диалог с читателем. (…) Тем не менее, диалог этот иногда оказывается несколько односторонен.», «Не всегда выстраивается баланс научности и популярности, и изложение некоторых тем кажется выборочным и не раскрытым до конца. Нужно ли было насыщать текст таким количеством узких терминов, часть из которых остаются не до конца объяснены, тоже вопрос.», «Хотя книга наполнена названиями разных отделов мозга, нет даже наглядных карт, что и где физически находится. Иллюстрации Олега Навального, безусловно, прекрасны и ироничны, и особую ценность им придает политическая ситуация в России и положение иллюстратора и его брата. Однако поможет ли это тем, кто заглянул в книгу, чтобы обогатиться знаниями?», «В общем, к книге «Мозг материален» могут возникнуть вопросы и у публики, не подготовленной к тяжелой научной артиллерии, и у профессиональных биологов. Однако она может понравиться и тем, и другим: читать очередную книгу Аси все равно интересно и познавательно»

[ADDITIONAL_READING] Р. Шмидт, Г. Тевс (под редакцией) — «Физиология человека»

Николлс Джон и другие — «От нейрона к мозгу»

Рамачандран Вилейанур С. — «Рождение разума»

Фрит Крис — «Мозг и душа. Как нервная деятельность формирует наш внутренний мир»

[NO_SCEDRECO] -->
1. Казанцева Ася Андреевна — Мозг материален. О пользе томографа, транскраниального стимулятора и клеток улитки для понимания человеческого поведения (АСТ, Corpus, 2019).pdf

<a id="Биологические-ловушки-мозга"></a>
## Биологические ловушки мозга

<!--- [JOURNALISM_SCIENCE_DEGREE] [Сайт книг Казанцевой](https://www.who-could-think.com/) — «С 2008 до 2015 года работала редактором в разных научно-популярных СМИ («Прогресс» на Пятом канале, сайт «Наука и технологии России», «Программа на будущее» на Науке 2.0, журнал «Здоровье») и писала статьи о науке и ее популяризации для разных изданий (Троицкий Вариант, Вокруг Света, Наука в фокусе, Slon.ru, Mtrpl.ru и др.)».

[Автор](https://www.who-could-think.com/). Издательство «АСТ, Corpus».

[INFO] Книга — лауреат премии «Просветитель» — http://premiaprosvetitel.ru/persons/view/?400 .

[POSITIVE_OR_NEUTRAL_REVIEW][REVIEW_RETELLING] Павел Бесчастнов, врач-психиатр, психотерапевт — https://trv-science.ru/2014/04/nejjrobiologiya-povsednevnosti/

[CRIM_SPEAKER] https://hubspeakers.ru/bio/kazantseva

[NO_SCEDRECO][NO_SCANNED_PDF] -->
1. Казанцева Ася Андреевна — Кто бы мог подумать. Как мозг заставляет нас делать глупости (АСТ, Corpus, 2014).epub

<a id="История-нейронаук"></a>
## История нейронаук

<!--- [ACADEMIC_DEGREE] M.D., is University Professor at Columbia, Kavli Professor and Director, Kavli Institute for Brain Sciences. 2000 — Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine — https://neuroscience.columbia.edu/profile/erickandel .

[BOOK_SUPPORT] Книжные проекты Дмитрия Зимина

[POSITIVE_OR_NEUTRAL_REVIEW] https://sci-hub.se/10.1901/jeab.2008.90-235 , https://www.jci.org/articles/view/28674 , https://digital.csic.es/bitstream/10261/61022/1/Eric%20R.%20Kandel%2c%20In%20Search%20of%20Memory.pdf

[BOOK_SERIES] Элементы

[NO_SCEDRECO][NO_CRITICISM] -->
1. [Кандель Эрик](https://neuroscience.columbia.edu/profile/erickandel) — В поисках памяти. Возникновение новой науки о человеческой психике (АСТ, Corpus, 2017).pdf

<a id="Нейромания"></a>
## Нейромания

<!--- [ACADEMIC_DEGREE] Сайтл — «MD, Brown University, 1984» — https://docs.house.gov/meetings/IF/IF02/20130522/100900/HHRG-113-IF02-Bio-SatelS-20130522.pdf ; Лилиенфельд — «his Ph.D. in Psychology (Clinical) from the University of Minnesota in 1990» — http://psychology.emory.edu/home/people/faculty/lilienfeld-scott.html

[POSITIVE_OR_NEUTRAL_REVIEW][REVIEW_ONE_PAGE] Lisa Conlan, Clinical Tutor in Global Mental Health, Institute of Psychiatry, King’s College London — https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/B586085408389879A36D8DCF2FB4006A/S0007125000278264a.pdf — «With this impressive book, Satel & Lilienfeld (practising cliniciansin psychiatry and psychology respectively) have achieved a timelyand balanced work on the limits of contemporary neuroscience», «Satel & Lilienfeld write with a rare clarity and economy of language», «That said, the succinct nature of the book is also a weakness. Given the complexity of the subject matter, I did feel at times it mightbenefit from a more in-depth analysis. This is, I imagine, anecessary trade-off to reach the wide-ranging audience this bookdeserves.»

Patricia Van Roon, Carleton University, Ottawa, ON, Canada — https://sci-hub.se/10.1177/0276236614568641

Alan Weissenbacher, Graduate Theological Union, USA — https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Alan-Weissenbacher/publication/263039878_Sally_Satel_and_Scott_Lilienfeld_Brainwashed_The_Seductive_Appeal_of_Mindless_Neuroscience/links/562981f108ae04c2aeaf1374/Sally-Satel-and-Scott-Lilienfeld-Brainwashed-The-Seductive-Appeal-of-Mindless-Neuroscience.pdf — «The book is not meant to be a critique of neuroscience itself.They offer a balanced account of the science involved and champion researchthat is done well.», «For a work purporting to deal with neuroscience, a surprising amount of thebook does not focus on the science itself. It could have been helpful to havemore discussion of the underlying aspects and assumptions involved in brainimaging. The authors spend a lot of time instead discussing topics such as thehistory, ethics, and law surrounding types of marketing persuasion or thehistory of lie detection. The chapter on free will for example has little neuroscience,opting instead for a more philosophical treatment of free will and an analysis of theethics of retributive justice, topics much more developed in other works», «Written at a popular level and focusing primarily on the practical and often pre-mature real-world uses of neuroscience that ignore its limitations and complexity,such a book should be accessible to those not in thefield, and as the examples usedimpact the public as a whole, it a recommended read for everyone who wishes to bemore neuroliterate.», «The book is ultimately a valuable addition to other works that point out thescope and limitation of current neuroscientific research»

[REVIEW_RETELLING] Barbara Wilson, The Oliver Zangwill Centre, Ely, UK — https://sci-hub.se/10.1080/09602011.2013.829653 — «Satel and Lilienfeld, the authors of this book, are not out to criticise imagingper se. Indeed they say brain imaging is one of the most important intellectualachievements of the last century. Instead they want to alert us to the oversim-plification of what pictures of the brain can and cannot tell us about human behaviour.», «Satel, a psychiatrist andLilienfeld, a psychologist, have produced a very readable and thought provok-ing book which all neuroscientists and therapists should read.», «This is a balanced book which does not damn imaging out of hand, itrecognises its strengths in some areas and its contributions to our understand-ing of the brain, but, like the randomised contolled trial, “It is a tool to be usedand not a god to be worshipped”»

[REVIEW_IN_MEDIA] SkepDoc (Harriet Hall), MD ( https://sciencebasedmedicine.org/author/harriet-hall/ ) — https://sciencebasedmedicine.org/brainwashed-neuroscience-and-its-perversions/ — «Satel and Lilienfeld briefly mention Dr. Daniel Amen and his Amen Clinic empire. I have never found any of Amen’s work credible. He has a great imagination and a lot of enthusiasm, but he’s not much of a scientist.», «Satel and Lilienfeld’s book belongs in the science-based medicine section. It offers keen insights into what neuroscience can and can’t do, and much food for thought.»

[REVIEW_RETELLING] Rob Haaxma, Paterswolde, Nederland — https://sci-hub.se/https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12474-014-0057-9 — «Volgens mij zijn de auteurs er voortreffelijk ingeslaagd deze zeer uiteenlopende onderwerpenhelder en met een grote kennis van zaken uiteen te zetten.»

[ADDITIONAL_READING] «Вынос мозга. Чарующее обаяние бездумной нейронауки» тех же авторов

Charles E. Dean — «The Skeptical Professional's Guide to Psychiatry»

William R. Uttal — «The New Phrenology»

[BOOK_SERIES] Совершенный мозг

[NO_SCEDRECO] -->
1. Сэйтл Салли, Лилиенфельд Скотт О. — Нейромания. Как мы теряем разум в эпоху расцвета науки о мозге (Издательство «Э», 2016).pdf

<a id="Учебники-по-когнитивным-нейронаукам"></a>
## Учебники по когнитивным нейронаукам

<a id="«Мозг-познание-разум»"></a>
### «Мозг, познание, разум»

<!--- [INFO] Имеются научные редакторы

[INFO] Сюда, а не в список книг для джинджерин, поскольку при выборочном просмотре показалось, что терминов/понятий/фамилий будет не так много

[Баарс Бернард](https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=1yGrWLkAAAAJ), [Гейдж Николь](https://neurotree.org/beta/publications.php?pid=11421)

[BOOK_SERIES] Лучший зарубежный учебник

-->
1. Баарс Бернард, Гейдж Николь — Мозг, познание, разум. Введение в когнитивные нейронауки. Том 1 (БИНОМ, Лаборатория знаний, 2014).pdf
1. Баарс Бернард, Гейдж Николь — Мозг, познание, разум. Введение в когнитивные нейронауки. Том 2 (БИНОМ, Лаборатория знаний, 2014).pdf

<a id="Образ-жизни"></a>
# Образ жизни

<a id="Экологичный-образ-жизни"></a>
## Экологичный образ жизни

<a id="NR-44"></a>
### NR

<a id="Паранаучный-бэкграунд-автора-1"></a>
#### Паранаучный бэкграунд автора

<!--- [PARASCIENCE] Согласно собственному сайту, Пайпер «degree in Holistic Health from The Institute for Integrative Nutrition and Columbia University». Критика Института со стороны Стефена Барретта, MD — https://quackwatch.org/credential/reports/iin/ . Критика на Skepdic — http://skepdic.com/skeptimedia/skeptimedia101.html .

[BOOK_SERIES] Жизнь в стиле эко 

[NO_SCANNED_PDF] -->
1. Пайпер Эшли — Грязная правда. Уберись на планете или убирайся с неё (Эксмо, 2020).pdf

<a id="Образование"></a>
# Образование

<a id="Быстрое-обучение"></a>
## Быстрое обучение

<a id="NR-45"></a>
### NR

<a id="Гуру"></a>
#### Гуру

<!--- [NOTE] Судя по биографии на собственном сайте, это успехмэн — https://joshkaufman.net/about-josh-kaufman/ . О научных достижениях Кауфмана ничего не говорится. -->
1. Кауфман Джош — Первые 20 часов. Как быстро научиться… чему угодно (Азбука-Аттикус, 2014).fb2

<a id="Важность-гуманитарных-наук-в-образовании"></a>
## Важность гуманитарных наук в образовании

<!--- [ACADEMIC_DEGREE] PhD Classical Philology, Harvard — https://humanities-web.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com/philosophy/prod/2020-06/Nussbaum%20CV%206-8-2020.pdf

Harvard University, Associate Professor of Philosophy and the Classics

University of Chicago, Ernst Freund Distinguished Service Professor of Law and Ethics. Проходит в высшие категории как профессор.

[BOOK_SCEDRECO][CRIM_SCIENCE_EDITOR] Научный редактор — кандидат философских наук Артём Александрович Смирнов — http://logosjournal.ru/static/artem-smirnov.html

[POSITIVE_OR_NEUTRAL_REVIEW] https://sci-hub.se/https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11217-011-9249-4.pdf , https://vo.hse.ru/data/2014/09/28/1315484715/2014-3_Pavlutkin.pdf , https://sci-hub.se/10.1177/0971685815608066 , https://democracyeducationjournal.org/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1028&context=home . Не нашёл негативных обзоров.

Maughn Rollins Gregory, Montclair State University, [Studies in Philosophy and Education](https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Maughn-Gregory/publication/263369824_Review_of_Martha_Nussbaum_Not_for_Profit_Why_Democracy_Needs_the_Humanities_Princeton_University_Press_2010/links/552e4f860cf22d43716dfdf3/Review-of-Martha-Nussbaum-Not-for-Profit-Why-Democracy-Needs-the-Humanities-Princeton-University-Press-2010.pdf) — «The agenda shared by these groups—that education be designed first and foremost as a means to personal and national profitability—derives largely from two separate and contestable propositions, to which Nussbaum gives only brief attention», «And as national educational policies are increasingly tailored to that mindset, it is important that thinkers like Nussbaum call attention to, and problematize this agenda», «This book is clearly intended for teachers, educational administrators, policy makers, parents and undergraduate education students, for whom it is an important new resource. The book will frustrate readers who notice all the intriguing philosophical pathways Nussbaum does not take, for instance: what tensions exist among the educational aims of job readiness, critical citizenship and a meaningful personal life? How universal is the humanism that informs Nussbaum’s ethical and political commitments? Do illiberal religious and ethnic groups have the right to deny their children a liberal arts education?», «And Nussbaum’s ability to write about the complex ethical and political dimensions of education for non-philosophers—with intelligence and wit, but without technical language and overwhelming references—is admirable, in fact, worth studying itself»

[BOOK_SERIES] Теория и практика образования

[PHIL_PUBL] Философско-публицистическая работа -->
1. [Нуссбаум Марта](https://philosophy.uchicago.edu/faculty/nussbaum) — Не ради прибыли. Зачем демократии нужны гуманитарные науки (Высшая школа экономики, 2014).pdf

<a id="Искусство-обучать"></a>
## Искусство обучать

<!--- [INFO] 1. Книги ориентированы на коммерческую публику, 2. Не нашёл информации о её публикациях в научных журналах. Но: “Her MS degree is in Instructional Systems Technology from Indiana University and she’s been an adjunct faculty member at the Minneapolis College of Art and Design and an Elearning Guild Guildmaster.” Вероятно, можно давать категорию «Is». -->
1. [Дирксен Джули](https://mycampus.maine.edu/web/uc-faculty-portal/keynote-speaker) — Искусство обучать. Как сделать любое обучение нескучным и эффективным (Манн, Иванов и Фербер, 2013).pdf

<a id="Критика-системы-образования"></a>
## Критика системы образования

<a id="Деструктивные-неолиберальные-реформы-российского-образования"></a>
### Деструктивные неолиберальные реформы российского образования

<!--- [INFO] У книги нет рецензентов. Темы рассматриваются односторонне. Научная деятельность Ильина может считаться специфичной для темы. Вероятно, можно поместить в категорию «с ограничениями». -->
1. [Ильин Алексей Николаевич](https://omgpu.ru/person/ilin_an) — Образование, поверженное реформами (Университетская книга, 2020).pdf

<a id="Пресечение-внедрения-сомнительных-образовательных-практик"></a>
### Пресечение внедрения сомнительных образовательных практик

<!--- [ACADEMIC_DEGREE] «Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts: Ph.D. in Psychology, 1990» — https://docplayer.net/8301045-Curriculum-vitae-daniel-t-willingham-willingham-virginia-edu.html

[ADDITIONAL_READING] Daniel Willingham, «Why Don't Students Like School?: A Cognitive Scientist Answers Questions About How the Mind Works and What It Means for the Classroom»

Daniel Willingham, «Raising kids who read: what parents and teachers can do»

John Hattie, «Visible Learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement»

Pedro de Bruyckere, Paul Kirschner en Casper Hulshof, «Urban Myths about Learning and Education»

[NO_PDF][NO_SCEDRECO][NO_REVIEW] -->
1. Willingham Daniel T. — When Can You Trust the Experts？ How to Tell Good Science from Bad in Education (Jossey-Bass, 2012).epub

<a id="Сигнальная-модель-образования"></a>
### Сигнальная модель образования

<a id="HC-7"></a>
#### HC

<!--- [ACADEMIC_DEGREE] «Ph.D., Economics, Princeton University, 1997» — https://econfaculty.gmu.edu/bcaplan/cv.html

[POSITIVE_OR_NEUTRAL_REVIEW][REVIEW_RETELLING] Zelin Zhuo Institute of International and Comparative Education, Research Center for Hong Kong and Macao Youth Education, South China Normal University, Guangzhou, China; Frank Okai Larbi Institute of International and Comparative Education, South China Normal University — https://sci-hub.se/10.1080/1360080X.2020.1836571 — «A careful consideration of this book will encourage educationalists, policy makers and educational agencies to assess the dangers that educational signalling poses to the quality of educational systems and human capital development.», «However, Caplan’s argument for reducing educational funding to miti-gate education’s signalling effects would be decried by many researchers as they believe that government funding helps to increase access to education regardless of students’ social class.», «On the contrary, we argue that the nature of assessment in much education rather encourages rote learning with less emphasis on skills acquisition. We believe that this book is suitable for educational policy programs in higher education to foster critical enquiry and analysis by researchers to counter the signalling model of education.»

Ewart Keep, Department of Education, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK — https://sci-hub.se/10.1080/01425692.2019.1579402 — «As such, this book is a useful resource for teaching at master’s level, particularly as a way of opening up debate with what Caplan calls ‘human capital purists’, and it is written in a style that invites debate.», «That said, many educationalists and sociologists will be either amused or bemused by some of Caplan’s libertarian arguments. For example, his treatment of social class and of the social justice issues consequent upon the distribution of educational opportunities (pp. 213–215) is brief and as a consequence quite superficial. Most education is signalling, and the poor will always lose out in an arms race of credential acquisition led by the rich», «First, Caplan’s definition of skill tends to focus on tasks that people undertake in work and his notion of useful is narrowly bounded and concerned with paid employment. As a result, he does not engage adequately with the possibility that through acquiring in-depth mastery of bodies of knowledge, mental capabilities concerning structured analysis and argumentation are thereby fostered and that these can be applied outside the immediate field of study, not least in employment, but also in adult life.», «It is not clear that Caplan’s arguments demolish the case for this facet of education’s mission, but they do raise quite stark and uncomfortable questions about how well current models of curriculum and pedagogy are delivering on it in the United States.», «It is unlikely that Professor Caplan will be receiving many invitations to speak at mainstream English educational research conferences, but this should not blind anyone to the fact that, whether we approve of or accept his arguments or not, all is not well with mass education and there are some issues raised in his book that need to be answered.»

Hugh Lauder, Department of Education, University of Bath, Bath, UK — https://sci-hub.se/10.1080/01425692.2019.1579402 — «Caplan is the first to take the view that education in general is, for the most part, a waste of time», «The second is that there is an extensive literature on the way real-world recruitment decisions are made (for example, Brown and Hesketh 2004; Brown, Lauder, and Ashton 2011; Rivera 2016) but that is of little interest to Caplan: a point that needs to be considered.», «however, it ignores the historical analysis that led Schultz to propose ‘pure’ human capital in the first place.», «One of the disappointments in The Case Against Education is that in describing the work he has put into the book, Caplan has blogged about the interdisciplinary focus that he was seeking to take, which is not evident.», «Had Caplan looked at the empirical research on recruitment, he might have been able to take a different view of how to interpret signalling», «The aims of education should not be based solely on an economic rationale since the discus-sion of the role of education in fostering democratic dispositions is clearly a further justification for education»

[BOOK_OR_AUTHOR_OR_CONCEPT_CRITICISM] Anna Vignoles, Faculty of Education, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK — https://sci-hub.se/10.1080/01425692.2019.1579402 — «There is a distinct lack of robust empirical evidence to inform us on whether and how individuals’ lives are enriched (in the broadest sense) by their education, although Caplan does present some rather negative evidence on this issue.», «Claiming that education does not, on average, enrich people’s lives is clearly provocative. Of course, the prose is deliberately contentious to engage the reader, and the book is indeed a highly enjoyable read. Provocation aside, Caplan is right to set down the challenge to economists and policy-makers across the globe who agree on very little», «The evidence Caplan discusses is variable in terms of research rigour, and often mixed in terms of findings.», «Caplan in his review of this particular bit of the literature argues that these methods raise as many questions as they answer but it does need to be acknowledged that most-quasi experimental studies suggest a positive impact from education on productivity and earnings. Individual studies may have their weak-nesses but a range of different quasi-experimental approaches are more supportive of a causal link between education and productivity than Caplan implies.», «However, picking individual topics and noting that specific jobs do not require that knowledge may be missing the point. Students learn bodies of knowledge and ways of thinking that help them understand the world. Arguably, they can then build on this when learning new things, such as the tasks required for their jobs. In any case, mainstream occupations often use elements of the science that Caplan seems to be dis-missing as irrelevant for the job market.», «Further, Caplan undermines his own argument in places. On the one hand he claims that students only appear to learn what they are taught, arguing that they have limited ability to transfer learning from one context to another. Yet he then singles out some degree subjects for particular criticism as being completely irrel-evant, such as liberal arts degrees.», «Overall, I did enjoy reading this challenging book and it raises some very important questions for educationalists and policy-makers alike. That said, from the perspective of a professor who clearly has benefited hugely in the very broadest sense from education, I cannot possibly argue for fewer educational opportunities for other people’s children.»

Allen Mendenhall, Thomas Goode Jones School of Law — https://www.cato.org/sites/cato.org/files/serials/files/cato-journal/2018/5/cj-v38n2-book-reviews_2.pdf — «Caplan sensibly advocates vocational training as an institutionalcorrective, but has little workable advice for people pursuing certain vocations. Someone who wants to be a teacher must earn the neces-sary credential; someone who wants to be a lawyer must attend lawschool. Whether these credentials are needed at all—that is, whetherthey are suitable prerequisites that adequately prepare students forthe everyday practice of their desired vocation — is a significant question warranting extensive debate, but regrettably it falls outside thescope of Caplan’s project.», «inflaming passions at least he might redirect attention to the centralmission of universities: to educate and spread knowledge», «I commend the colorful chapter “Nourishing Mother” to the skeptically inclined humanitiesprofessor who stands ready to accuse Caplan of prizing social andeconomic returns over the immeasurable effects of literary, aesthetic,philosophical, historical, or theological inquiry.», «Skeptics should readThe Case Against Educationwith an open mind and an eye toward thefuture. Caplan is heavy on issue-spotting but short on solutions, but heprovokes difficult conversations that are long past due»

Tan Shennon, Research Intern, Kaplan Higher Education Singapore — https://journals.sfu.ca/jalt/index.php/jalt/article/download/209/185 — «However, I disagree that cultural education and humanities should be made optional in school. If these subjects are made optional in K-12 education, what are the odds of students taking the initiative to take up additional courses», «Other critiques that can be directed at the author’s arguments are the validity of the sample (the book is rather U.S.-centric and does not consider the global situation sufficiently), the illusion of cause and effect, and the perpetuation of education inequalities.», «As this book is from the perspective of a single author, his perception of education is based on his background and experiences. It is quite a sweeping statement to say that everyone else would share the same perception and experience.», «The signalling theory discussed in the book also seemed to portray an illusionary cause and effect relationship between signalling and investment of education. Whether the investment made is poor or good is subjective, and saying that money spent on education is a poor investment is too quick a conclusion to make.», «Caplan also says that bad educational experiences are due to too much investment in education. I beg to differ; bad educational experiences are due to insufficient investments in improving the learning experience.», «Finally, Caplan also suggests for government to cut back on subsidies for education. This could lead to dire consequences of even further educational inequality. By cutting back on tuition, the poor would face more difficulties achieving higher education, contributing to a further widening of the gap between the rich and the poor.», «The case against education raises important questions about the role of educational signalling in society. It also provides the opportunity to discuss provocative arguments on education. On the whole, I recommend reading this book with an open mind, while reflecting critically on its controversial approach to higher education.»

James Davis, Brooklyn College, CUNY ( https://radicalteacher.library.pitt.edu/ojs/radicalteacher/about/editorialTeam ) — https://radicalteacher.library.pitt.edu/ojs/radicalteacher/article/download/618/481 — «After all, a similar critique of American education has been formulated by the radical Left, who have long argued that schooling is largely a matter of sorting young people into the laboring or professional-managerial class, their learning an incidental artifact of the sorting procedure.», «He feels he’s telling an unpopular truth, the only one the data support, even if the American public resists it, afflicted as we are by “Social Desirability Bias.” So, it’s not enough to dismiss his analyses reflexively as the intellectual underpinnings of the far Right: music to the ears of Grover Norquist, Paul Ryan, and other deregulators.», «Caplan can be derided as a mean libertarian –libertarian he owns, mean he is at pains to disavow –or a shill for the policy wonks pushing the national deregulation agenda. But what radical educators will find more disturbing still are the myopic, even dangerous, assumptions on which Caplan’s argument rests. It’s especially urgent to name these assumptions because the author is an adept rhetorician, dodging and parrying, challenging himself to avoid strawman arguments and go boldly where the data take him.», «Aspect one: There is nothing except the market in Caplan’s vision. This agnosticism toward education’s content is troubling because it doesn’t make the case for or against a particular curriculum, it says only that the curriculum should be subordinated in every instance to occupational prospects. If growth sectors are in internet pornography, geriatric nursing, and offshore oil drilling (my examples, not Caplan’s), our obligation is to train people for those fields.», «But even if life wereonly work, our working selves are more than our productivity and salary, Caplan’s sole measures of value.», «However, one can accept Caplan’s data and reach a different conclusion. It’s not that the education system is insufficiently market-aligned but rather that market fundamentalism is already so pervasivethat many Americans feel that education is just going through the motions. If students feel that school is basically “useless,” this may not indicate that the curriculum should be more “useful” but that we have accepted the free market doctrine that the only “useful” skills and experiences are those directly convertible into income.», «But a way must be found to address it other than the prescriptions Caplan recommends. If education primarily serves a “signaling” function, as Caplan and the radical Left agree it does, we should recognize the pervasive fear that drives the signalers, especially in the post-industrial era.», «The Case Against Educationpresents itself as a sober reckoning with inconvenient truths about U.S. education, employing systematic methods to reach unflinching policy proposals. But these methods only make sense if one accepts a set of deeply troubling assumptions that remain unstated and unchallenged in Caplan’s propulsive narrative.»

[BOOK_PROPOSALS_CRITICISM] John Howlett, Keele University — https://sci-hub.se/10.1080/00071005.2019.1676013 — «Caplan’s sole reliance on the dismal science ofeconomics and the job market as the determinant of schooling and education’s value narrows his argument and the book does not really consider in any meaningful way thevast swathe of literature which posits theintrinsicbenefits of education.», «Yet, such progressive soundings do not detract us from asking if reducing educationsubsidy and encouraging drop-out is really the best recipe for a successful, compassionate, and ordered society. Still less do they ask if de-motivating the disengaged alsodeters the less affluent. It is precisely such questions and contradictions which make thisa compelling, if occasionally uncomfortable and frustrating, read which should serve tomake those in the profession reassert and re-justify anew their claims over the knowledgeand systems held so unquestionably dear.»

Dr. Vik Loveday, a Lecturer in the Department of Sociology at Goldsmiths, University of London — https://research.gold.ac.uk/id/eprint/23871/1/Loveday%20Review%20final.pdf — «For academic readers familiar with Bourdieusian analyses of education, the powerful, symbolic aspectof educational credentials is hard to refute; yet while Caplan is engaged in a process of critique himself, far from dismantling the elitism inherent in educational systems that reproduce privilege (Bourdieu and Passeron 1990), hisargument appears to re-entrench social divisions.», «Attempts by Caplan to quantify the proportion of ‘educational returns’ down to mere signalling -estimated by him at 80% (p.192) -are based on guesswork ‘because candor trumps caution’», «What follows throughout the book is a rather curious methodological mix: dogged attempts to quantify the often un-measurable, are presented alongside anecdotal material», «This is where, I believe, the most troubling of Caplan’s assertions begins to emerge: it quickly becomesapparent during the course of the bookthat ideas about whois educable are underpinned by notions of hereditary ability (p.75), whilethe social context in which notions of ‘ability’ are constructed and the factors which then determine whether young people are deemed ‘able’ are neglected.», «Yet,aside from displaying what many social scientists will findto be deeply unpalatable attitudestowards groups who have historically -and continue today to be socially-marginalisedand discriminated against, Caplan’s presentation ofmaterial is also misleading: arguments influenced by behavioural genetics are presented as indisputable ‘fact’, and the highly contested nature of this field of study (see Panofsky 2014) remains unacknowledged», «Caplan’s position appears woe fully naive: undoubtedly, society’s most privileged will continue undeterred to marshal their resources into ensuring their children receive expensive, elite educations, and so measures to reduce the affordability of education serve to re-embed existing divisions;it is unclear how long Caplan believes it», «Without having himself conducted empirical research in educational contexts, and with students’ voices noticeablyabsent from the book(aside from the fictionalised characters presented in the imagined scenarios in the final substantive chapter), the reader comes away with nofeel for how students make sense of their own participation in education», «Caplan’s critique is one amongst many.Yet it is the presumptions on which the scaffold of his argument is constructedthat lead to the fundamentally flawed conclusion that‘education in grossly over-rated’»

William M. Chace, president of Wesleyan and Emory universities ( https://english.stanford.edu/people/william-chace ) — https://www.researchgate.net/profile/William-Chace/publication/327586128_The_Case_against_Education_Why_the_Education_System_Is_a_Waste_of_Time_and_Money_by_Bryan_Caplan/links/5ef3e59192851c35353fa705/The-Case-against-Education-Why-the-Education-System-Is-a-Waste-of-Time-and-Money-by-Bryan-Caplan.pdf — «deeply researched and yet pro-foundly silly book», «Any illumination or sudden understanding com-ing to an undergraduate — any problem solved, any moment in history under-stood, any novel cherished — is ephemeral because it has no workplace utility», «The book is a libertarian tract composed by a “cyn-ical idealist” who knows his designs for the demolition of the educational enter-prise can never be realized but whose impressive learning and scholarly energy as an economist should not, he thinks, be wasted on a thesis either humdrum or conventional. The result, enthusiastically laid out, is his own “strange stuff.”»

Peter Murphy, Department of Philosophy and Religion, University of Indianapolis — https://view.officeapps.live.com/op/view.aspx?src=https%3A%2F%2Fphilarchive.org%2Farchive%2FMURROB-2 — «This is a thorough book that synthesizes an impressive amount of research in education, psychology, sociology, and economics», «I highly recommend it to anyone who cares about education and is willing to move beyond our current underinformed positive thinking»

[REVIEW_RETELLING][BOOK_PROPOSALS_CRITICISM] Laura Pimentel Barbosa, Doutoranda em Ciência Política pela Universidade de São Paulo, Brasil — https://periodicos.unifap.br/index.php/estacao/article/download/5336/laurav9n2.pdf — «As sugestões e reflexões de Caplan muitas vezes parecem estar na contramão do senso comum a respeito da educação e do que nós socialmente valorizamos; no entanto, muitas de suas ideias e sugestões em parte são retira-das da realidade do caso alemão e, nesse sen-tido, não são absolutamente fora das nossas possibilidades.», «Somos levados a refletir também sobre o efeito inflacionário das credenciais, quer dizer, na medida em que o mercado espera que as pessoas tenham no mínimo um curso superi-or, mais credenciais e diplomas serão necessá-rios para que uma pessoa possa se destacar.», «Além disso, a ênfase na ideia de que é a educação superior o principal caminho para o desenvolvimento econômico pode levar governos a promover a criação de universidades pouco qualificadas, gerando uma nova injustiça social, uma vez que muitos alunos acabarão investindo tempo e dinheiro em cursos de pouca qualidade, quando poderiam estar investindo esses recur-sos em outras atividades importantes para a sua qualidade de vida.»

[REVIEW_IN_MEDIA] Pierre Courtioux, directeur de recherche en économie à l’EDHEC Business School — https://laviedesidees.fr/A-bas-l-education.html — «Si vous n’êtes pas convaincu par l’argumentaire de ce second chapitre, inutile d’aller plus loin dans la lecture de l’ouvrage», «De ce point de vue, l’auteur prend implicitement ses distances avec un ensemble de résultats empiriques issus de la théorie du capital humain, qui dans la lignée des travaux lancés par J. Heckman montrent par exemple l’intérêt qu’il y a à investir dans la petite enfance.», «Les lecteurs qui auraient voulu une discussion un peu plus poussée sur le lien entre compétences professionnelles et connaissances générales (sont-elles indépendantes ou complémentaires ?) en seront pour leurs frais. De même, la distinction entre capital humain spécifique, qui décrit les compétences acquises sur le poste de travail et non transférables sur un poste dans une autre entreprise, et le capital humain général qui regroupe l’ensemble de ces savoirs transférables et valorisables quels que soient le poste ou l’entreprise, ne sont pas évoqués. Enfin, le coût social de la spécialisation professionnelle trop poussée, qui peut se traduire par des difficultés de progression salariale ou la nécessité d’une reconversion en cours de carrière, n’est pas discuté non plus.», «La question de leurs stratégies, des compétences qu’elles recherchent, des offres de postes qui ne trouvent pas preneur ou de manière plus générale des évolutions en cours du marché du travail (on pense notamment à la théorie de la polarisation des emplois aux deux extrêmes de la distribution des compétences) ne sont pas vraiment discutées.», «Ces conclusions laissent perplexe. L’insistance sur l’intérêt de la formation professionnelle qu’il défend comme seul horizon possible de l’éducation publique, et l’absence d’une analyse des besoins des entreprises donnent à l’ouvrage aux conclusions très libérales un argumentaire incomplet.», «Ce manque est certainement à mettre en lien avec le caractère très américano-centré de l’ouvrage.»

[ADDITIONAL_READING] Tony Wagner — «The Global Achievement Gap»

Alison Wolf — «Does Education Matter?: Myths About Education and Economic Growth»

Phillip Brown, Hugh Lauder, Sin Yi Cheung — «The Death of Human Capital: Its Failed Promise and How to Renew It»

Phillip Brown, Anthony Hesketh — «The Mismanagement of Talent: Employability and Jobs in the Knowledge Economy»

Lauren A. Rivera — «Pedigree: How Elite Students Get Elite Jobs»

Richard Pring, Gary Thomas — «Evidence-based Practice in Education (Conducting Educational Research)»

Бурдьё Пьер, Пассрон Жан-Клод — «Воспроизводство: элементы теории системы образования»

Daniel Willingham — «When Can You Trust the Experts: How to Tell Good Science from Bad in Education»

Derek Bok — «Our Underachieving Colleges: a Candid Look at How Much Students Learn and Why They Should Be Learning More»

Grace Llewellyn — «The Teenage Liberation Handbook: How to Quit School and Get a Real Life and Education»

Clemens Knobloch — «Wir sind doch nicht blöd! Die unternehmerische Hochschule»

Mike Rose — «Why School? Reclaiming Education for All of Us»

Jan Bransen — «Gevormd of vervormd? Een pleidooi voor ander onderwijs»

Tom Bennett — Teacher Proof. Why Research in Education Doesn’t Always Mean what it Claims, and what You Can Do about it

Тимоти Уокер — Финская система обучения. Как устроены лучшие школы в мире

John Smyth — The Toxic University. Zombie Leadership, Academic Rock Stars and Neoliberal Ideology

William Deresiewicz — Excellent Sheep: The Miseducation of the American Elite and the Way to a Meaningful Life

[NO_PDF][NO_SCEDRECO] -->
1. Caplan Bryan Douglas — The Case Against Education. Why the Education System Is a Waste of Time and Money (Princeton University Press, 2018).epub

<a id="Тирания-школьного-образования"></a>
### Тирания школьного образования

<a id="NR-46"></a>
#### NR

<a id="Недостоверная-информация-6"></a>
##### Недостоверная информация

<!--- [INFO] См. критику — https://gaither.wordpress.com/2009/02/03/gatto-on-the-evils-of-public-education/ , https://blog.thelinguist.com/john-taylor-gatto-the-anti-schooler/ . Заявления Гатто сенсационны и глобальны, но однозначного мнения в научном сообществе, что Гатто паранаучен, я не нашёл.

[BOOK_SERIES] Счастье как образ жизни
-->
1. [Гатто Джон Тэйлор](https://fee.org/articles/john-taylor-gatto-1935-2018-remembering-americas-most-courageous-teacher/) — Фабрика марионеток. Исповедь школьного учителя (Генезис, 2006).pdf

<a id="Нейробиология-обучения"></a>
## Нейробиология обучения

<!--- [ACADEMIC_DEGREE] [École des Neurosciences, CV](http://www.paris-neuroscience.fr/sites/paris-neuroscience.fr/files/imce/cv_standehaene_2016.pdf) — «1989, Ecole des Hautes Etudes en Sciences sociales (EHESS), Paris, PhD, Cognitive science», «1999, Ecole des Hautes Etudes en Sciences sociales (EHESS), Paris, Habilitation to direct research, Cognitive neuroscience»

[ACADEMIC_DEGREE_EDITOR] Захаров Илья Михайлович, [Психологический институт РАО](https://www.pirao.ru/workers/zakharov-ilya-mikhaylovich/) — «В 2012 году закончил кафедру психофизиологии факультета психологии МГУ, в 2008-2014 годах работал лаборантом в лаборатории клинической нейрофизиологии в ГНЦ ССП им. Сербского, психофизиологом в ЦПМСС "Северо-Запад" и "Центре нейрореабилитации и патологии речи". С 2014 года сотрудник лаборатории возрастной психогенетики. Сфера научных интересов психофизиология индивидуальных различий, психология восприятия.». Не нашёл информации о его учёной степени.

[Is/Mass]

[POSITIVE_OR_NEUTRAL_REVIEW] Dr Roslyn Neilson, [LDA Bulletin](https://www.ldaustralia.org/Book%20Review%20Dehaene%20Ros%20Neilson.pdf) —

[REVIEW_NO_ACCESS][REVIEW_RETELLING] Michael David, Care Research and Technology Centre, Dementia Research Institute, Imperial College London, [Cognitive Neuropsychiatry](https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13546805.2020.1865897?journalCode=pcnp20) — «The book is just as powerful as Reading in the Brain in terms of translating quite specialised research into accessible food for thought for readers, and its practical implications are equally compelling.», «How we learn… is a challenging and very interesting book, and I think that it would be useful to set at least Part 3 as a core component of pre-service teacher education. It is certainly worthwhile for teachers to take the time to read and digest it, and parents will find it intriguing.»

[REVIEW_ONE_PAGE] Robert Stirrups, [The Lancet Neurology](https://sci-hub.se/https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(20)30229-5) — « The idea that children should be encouraged to independently discover and learn ideas from first principles comes in for criticism, as does the idea that different people use different sensory systems to learn.», «His argument may fuel debate among educators about the best strategies and practices to pursue, but he has made a strong argument that the pillars of learning are built upon a firm foundation of scientific research.»

[REVIEW_RETELLING] Rafael Tatsch Jacóbsen, Doutorando em Letras na UNISC -Universidade de Santa Cruz & Rosângela Gabriel, Doutora em Letras, professora e pesquisadora do Programa de Pós-graduação em Letras da UNISC – Universidade de Santa Cruz do Sul. Bolsista — [ReVEL](http://www.revel.inf.br/files/cd0ea122387687f004cc5d3eb0f94c76.pdf) — «Em How we learn, Dehaene nos apresenta um universo de pesquisas e, com uma linguagem fluida, de fácil compreensão e repleta de exemplos advindos da história da humanidade, deixa-nos uma importante mensagem sobre o papel da educação em conjunto com as ciências, escolas, professores e famílias, para o benefício da formação sociocultural de nossas crianças»

[REVIEW_RETELLING] Martine Fournier, [Sciences Humaines](https://www.cairn.info/magazine-sciences-humaines-2018-11-page-31.html) — «Cet ouvrage est une somme qui, assurément, marque un pas dans le long processus d’exploration du cerveau humain même si, selon certains, nous n’en sommes encore qu’aux balbutiements.»

[BOOK_OR_AUTHOR_OR_CONCEPT_CRITICISM][REVIEW_IN_MEDIA] Alex Quigley, [TES](https://www.tes.com/news/book-review-how-we-learn) — «Reading Dehaene, along with commenting on his writing, is enough to invoke a little fear and timorousness.», «Terms such as “a priori hypotheses” bump into the “curse of dimensionality” as each page forces you to follow along with great care, but with slightly less interest. (…) Should this great researcher have to mediate his work so plainly for simpletons like me?», «Alas, each of them offers a more readable, accessible account than Dehaene does.», «Well, there was no doubt a tremendous respect for the author’s towering intelligence, but I was left a little uninspired, too.»

[ADDITIONAL_READING] Станислас Деан — «Сознание и мозг. Как мозг кодирует мысли»

Stanislas Dehaene — «Reading in the brain: the new science of how we read»

Stanislas Dehaene — «Vers une science de la vie mentale»

Gabriel A. Radvansky, Mark H. Ashcraft — «Cognition»

Dale H. Schunk — «Learning TheoriesAn Educational Perspective»

Benedict Carey — «How we learn: the surprising truth about when, where and why it happens»

Roger Bruning, Gregory Schraw, Monica Norby — «Cognitive Psychology and Instruction Pearson»

Yana Weinstein, Megan Sumeracki, Oliver Caviglioli — «Understanding How We Learn»

Джон Хэтти — «Видимое обучение»

Daisy Christodoulou — «Seven Myths About Education»

Daniel L. Schwartz, Jessica M. Tsang, Kristen P. Blair — «The ABCs of How We Learn: 26 Scientifically Proven Approaches, How They Work, and When to Use Them»
-->
1. Деан Станислас — Как мы учимся꞉ почему мозг учится лучше, чем любая машина… пока (Эксмо, 2021).pdf

<a id="Педагогические-технологии"></a>
## Педагогические технологии

<a id="Инновационные-модели-обучения"></a>
### Инновационные модели обучения

<!--- [ACADEMIC_DEGREE] [Институт стратегии развития образования РАО](http://www.instrao.ru/index.php/sotrudniki-podrazdeleniy/item/1789-klarin-mihail-vladimirovich) — «Физический факультет МГПИ им.В.И.Ленина. Аспирантура, докторантура Российской академии образования. Бизнес-школа им.Шулиха, Йоркский ун-т, Торонто, Канада. Вислохский институт системных решений (Германия).»

[CRIM_COACHING] [Институт стратегии развития образования РАО](http://www.instrao.ru/index.php/sotrudniki-podrazdeleniy/item/1789-klarin-mihail-vladimirovich) — «Эксперт-бренд в области коучинга высших руководителей и организационного /управленческого консультирования, корпоративного обучения, практической психологии, развивающих практик. Вошёл в топ-10 российских тренеров согласно рейтингу журнала «Секрет фирмы» (2004), в топ-5 специалистов в номинации «Командообразование» (Первое всероссийское исследование «Лучшие бизнес тренеры России, 2004-2014»).», «специалист по коучингу и организационному консультированию в формате структурных и организационных расстановок (Вислохский институт системных решений, Германия). Сертифицирован как профессиональный сертифицированный коуч (PCC) в Международной федерации коучинга (ICF)», «Председатель правления Ассоциации русскоязычных коучей. Сопредседатель Рабочей группы по разработке профессионального стандарта «Коуч» в РФ.»

[ACADEMIC_DEGREE_REVIEWERS] Киселёв Александр Федотович, [РАО](http://rusacademedu.ru/akademiya/akademiki-rao/kiselev-aleksandr-fedotovich/) — «доктор исторических наук, академик РАО с 23 декабря 2008 г.»

Ямбург Евгений Александрович, [МГПУ](http://mpgu.su/graduates/yamburg-evgeniy-aleksandrovich/) — «доктор педагогических наук, член-корреспондент РАО»

[ADDITIONAL_READING] Ямбург Евгений Александрович — «Беспощадный учитель: педагогика non-fiction»

Томас Гэри — «Образование: Очень Краткое Введение»

[NO_REVIEW] -->
1. Кларин Михаил Владимирович — Инновационные модели обучения꞉ Исследование мирового опыта (ЛУч, 2018).pdf

<a id="Энциклопедия-образовательных-технологий"></a>
### Энциклопедия образовательных технологий

<!--- [Автор](https://www.elibrary.ru/download/elibrary_24135979_35570351.pdf) -->

1. Селевко Герман Константинович — Энциклопедия образовательных технологий. Том 1 (НИИ школьных технологий, 2006).pdf
1. Селевко Герман Константинович — Энциклопедия образовательных технологий. Том 2 (НИИ школьных технологий, 2006).pdf

<a id="Программированное-обучение"></a>
## Программированное обучение

<!--- [INFO] Не нашёл информацию о научных редакторах. Кто такой И. Н. Драчук, мне найти не удалось.

[NO_OCR] -->
1. [Беспалько Владимир Павлович](http://rusacademedu.ru/akademiya/akademiki-rao/bespal-ko-vladimir-pavlovich/) — Программированное обучение. Дидактические основы (Высшая школа, 1970).pdf
<!--- [INFO] Редактор — Анатолий Владимирович Нетушил. Доктор технических наук, первый декан факультета автоматики и вычислительной техники.

[INFO] Авторы — бакалавры и магистр, чего недостаточно для вхождения в категории для учёных. Категория «Рецензент — учёный»

[NOTE] Биографии авторов

[NO_OCR] -->
1. Томас Чарльз Обри, Дэвис Дж, Опеншоу Д., Бёрд Джон Болтар — Перспективы программированного обучения. Руководство по составлению программ (Мир, 1966).pdf

<a id="Психология-обучения"></a>
## Психология обучения

1. [Брунер Джером](http://hrono.ru/biograf/bio_b/brunerds.php) — Процесс обучения (Издательство Академии педагогических наук, 1962).doc

<a id="Общество"></a>
# Общество

<a id="Бесчеловечность"></a>
## Бесчеловечность

<!--- [INFO] Философов, пишущих без источников, в отдельную подкатегорию выделить. Категория «Ad» для них, похоже, чересчур.

[Автор](https://pure.royalholloway.ac.uk/portal/files/18903799/2014hemmensajphd.pdf)

[BOOK_SERIES] Планы на Будущее

[NO_PDF] -->
1. Ванейгем Рауль — Письмо моим детям и детям грядущего мира (Гилея, 2015).pdf

<a id="Гражданская-культура"></a>
## Гражданская культура

<a id="Аморальный-фамилизм"></a>
### Аморальный фамилизм

<a id="HC-8"></a>
#### HC

<!--- [ACADEMIC_DEGREE] “where he received a Ph.D. in political science in 1952” — https://news.harvard.edu/gazette/story/2001/01/memorial-minutes/

[NOTE] Редактор — Пётр Фаворов — заместитель главного редактора журнала «Афиша» — https://seance.ru/names/favorov/ , редактор Prime Russia Magazine — https://carnegie.ru/experts/1231 . Не нашёл сведений о его учёных званиях. Категория книге не повышается.

[BOOK_SUPPORT] Фонд Фридриха Науманна за свободу (Германия)

[POSITIVE_OR_NEUTRAL_REVIEW] Enzo Rutigliano, Dipartimento di Sociologia e Ricerca Sociale, Università di Trento — https://journals.openedition.org/qds/938 — «Allora, che cosa possiamo dire oggi, in occasione della recente ristampa del libro, a proposito di quanto accaduto nel tempo di «due, tre, quattro generazioni»? Dobbiamo purtroppo constatare che l’ethos di Montegrano non solo non è stato modificato da interventi strutturali e non, la maggior parte dei quali rivelatisi fallimentari (per esempio la riforma agraria), ma è come se l’ethos di Montegrano si sia allargato al punto da diventare l’ethos dell’intero meridione d’Italia costituendo, per dir così, l’acqua in cui nuotano, a loro agio, le organizzazioni criminali.»

[REVIEW_LONG][REVIEW_HIGH_ERUDITION] Pierluca Birindelli, University of Helsinki ( https://researchportal.helsinki.fi/en/persons/pierluca-birindelli ) — «Quando ero uno studente universitario, le analisi di Banfield non mi pa-revano così avulse dalla realtà degli anni Novanta (meno che mai da quella attuale). I sociologi italiani, tuttavia, le avevano criticate, e continuavano (con-tinuano) a farlo. Ragioniamo assieme a Pizzorno. Egli diceva che in condizioni di povertà, di marginalità storica e sociale, è razionale cercare vantaggi certi e immediati piuttosto che investire i propri sforzi verso la costruzione di un bene collettivo di là da venire: l’impegno pubblico sarebbe destinato a un sicuro fallimento», «Se le analisi proposte dal filone culturalista sono imprecise, superficiali, o del tutto sbagliate, perché sono adottate come rappresentazioni calzanti dell’Ita-lia? Perché questo “stigma” continua a essere adoperato dagli stranieri e dagli italiani stessi (Bagnasco 2006)», «Nella pre-fazione all’ultima edizione italiana delle Basi Morali, Bagnascoafferma quanto sia difficile liberarsi da Banfield: "ho il sospetto che anche in molti dei più accesi critici rimanga la sensazione di avere a che fare con una specie di fanta-sma nascosto da qualche parte nella casa, e pronto a ritornare quando e dove meno loro se lo aspettano"»

[BOOK_OR_AUTHOR_OR_CONCEPT_CRITICISM][REVIEW_LONG][REVIEW_HIGH_ERUDITION] Базалеев Олег Александрович — кандидат социологических наук — https://www.elibrary.ru/download/elibrary_26040594_52299783.pdf — «Основная дискуссия вокруг работы Бэнфилда (позднее и исследований Р. Патнэма, также посвященных южной Италии) развернулась вокруг того, что является причиной и что – следствием.», «Американского исследователя упрекают и в том, что в книге за небольшими исключениями отсутствует исторический и социально-экономический контекст, что делает анализ неполным, а также в том, что он существенно переоценивает значение социального капитала, практически игнорируя более фундаментальные структурные проблемы итальянского общества. Феноменальный успех книги Бэнфилда критики относят к тому, что он дал простое и прямолинейное объяснение проблемы, которая интересовала поколения учёных.», «В качестве па-радокса отмечают, что книга, написанная человеком, который едва ли мог говорить по-итальянски и провел всего девять месяцев в этой стране, стала самым известным социологическим исследованием по югу Италии», «Интересно, что американский исследователь, приводя факты, которые складываются в красноречивую картину ресурсной недостаточности, придает им мало значения.», «Бэнфилд, на наш взгляд, неоправданно противопоставляет отсутствие финансо-вого капитала другим факторам. Он верно заметил, что проблемы не сводимы только к бедности, но сосредоточил внимание исключительно на нематериальных факторах (личностные качества “аморального фамилиста”). Однако, как свидетельствуют исследования социальной эксклюзии последних двух десятилетий, крайнюю бедность, отсутствие финансового капитала и дефицитность иных ресурсов (образовательного, социального, культурного, административного капитала) не следует рассматривать изолированно друг от друга.», «Бэнфилд настаивает, что деление земель на мелкие изолированные наделы противоречит принципу экономической выгоды. Однако, как показал дореволюционный экономист и социолог В.П. Воронцов, разделение земли на мелкие наделы имело и рациональные причины.», «Почему же он тогда практически игнорирует данные социальные феномены, уделяет им несправедливо мало внимания?», «Мы предположили, что основная проблема местного сообщества заключается в острой дефицитности ресурсов.»

[REVIEW_LONG] Троцук Ирина Владимировна, доктор социологических наук — https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/sotsialno-ekonomicheskoe-znachenie-kultury-kontseptualnye-i-metodicheskie-nahodki-nesovershennogo-nablyudeniya/pdf — «Видимо, социокультурная дистанция и опора на наблюдения «чужака» (в страновом, языковом и социально-классовом смысле) и (в антропологическом смысле) «непроверенных проводников» (пе-реводящих содержание речи, но не растолковывающих ее суть) за-ставили Бэнфилда высказать сомнительные утверждения, слишком упростив сложные феномены, которые удобно интерпретировать в контексте якобы «простого» (отсталого) общества.», «Странно, что автор вос-производит подобные утверждения информантов как само собой разумеющиеся описания реального положения дел, не принимая во внимание целый ряд обстоятельств», «Несколько смещённая «оптика» автора нередко приводит его к странным выводам», «Бэнфилд как будто игнорирует тот факт, что описываемое им сообщество переживает сложный период трансформации, кото-рую принято называть модернизацией», «Несмотря на эмпирические основания своих концептуальных построений, автор постоянно балансирует между недооценкой (мо-дернизационных веяний и сельско-крестьянского контекста) и пе-реоценкой наблюдаемого.», «С одной стороны, признание автором ограничений его, по сути, мини-теории аморального фамилизма—прекрасный образец того, как нужно социологически-эмпирически изучать влияние культуры на (экономический) уклад и представлять результаты качествен-ного исследования. С другой стороны, автор не контекстуализиру-ет свои наблюдения как социально-типичные для модернизацион-ных процессов, уничтожающих сельско-крестьянский образ жизни, и иногда делает слишком серьезные обобщающие выводы», «В этом смысле книга Бэнфилда—потрясающе современное эмпирическое иссле-дование по экономической социологии»

[REVIEW_HIGH_ERUDITION][REVIEW_LONG][REVIEW_SUMMARY] Сергей Ушкин, кандидат социологических наук — https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/kultura-protiv-ekonomiki-amoralnyy-familizm-i-gnetuschaya-povsednevnost/pdf — «Поэтому мы не погрешим против истины, если скажем, что в ходе своей работы Бэнфилд получил достаточно детальный срез итальянского общества того времени, при этом значительная часть собран-ной информации размещена в приложениях к книге и представляет особую ценность.», «Однако Бэнфилд не учел одного: за ширмой тотальной разрухи в действительности скрывались сложные модернизационные процессы, пусть и более запоздалые, чем в некоторых других частях света, которые коренным образом переформатировали существовавшие на юге Италии формы социального капитала и сети его распределения.», «Как отмечает Бэнфилд, местные жители воспринимали его как чужака, которому в действительности нет дела до их проблем, поэтому готовы были рассказать многое о своей жизни и жизни дру-гих (с. 129). Впрочем, аргумент является более чем спорным и даже вступает в некоторое противоречие с выдвинутыми им самим теоретическими построениями; ведь если жители Монтеграно ориентированы на рационализацию своих действий для реализации собственных краткосрочных стратегий, то безвозмездное обще-ние с интервьюером явно не входит в их планы, более того — мешает воплощению других.», «Например, Джильберто Марселли в своей работе 1963 года поставил под сомне-ние выводы Бэнфилда, а также их доказательную базу 14. Он указывал, что резуль-таты исследования нельзя назвать репрезентативными, и особенно это касается тематических апперцептивных тестов, использование которых в сельской местно-сти приводит к значительным искажениям ввиду того, что крестьяне, в отличие от горожан, при построении ответов ориентированы на ожидания своей социаль-ной группы, и поэтому получаемые ответы не позволяют индивидуализировать респондента. Он обвинил Бэнфилда в популизме, попытках выдать желаемое за действительное; в частности, отмечалось, что содержание взятых интервью рас-ходится с теоретическими допущениями.», «Годом позже, в 1964 году, Эй Уикерс предложил перейти от замечаний Марсел-ли к более содержательным, по его мнению, аспектам — в первую очередь к игнорированию Бэнфилдом исторического контекста», «Аргументацию Марселли и Уикерса в 1966 году дополнил Алессандро Пиццор-но, который выделил несколько основных критических замечаний»

[REVIEW_SUMMARY] Sergio Lo Iacono, European University Institute — https://www.eui.eu/ProgrammesAndFellowships/MaxWeberProgramme/People/MaxWeberFellows/Fellows-2017-2018/Lo-Iacono — «La debolezza più evidente di una catena causale così lunga e complessa consisteproprio nella difficoltà di dimostrare tutti i singoli passaggi. Non è un caso che lediverse critiche mosse al lavoro di Banfield tendano a sottolineare in modo separato edistinto alcune fragilità nelle relazioni appena esplicitate.», «Successivamente, si sono sottolineate alcune incoerenze e debolezze delle maggioricritiche mosse nel corso dell’ultimo cinquantennio»

[BOOK_OR_AUTHOR_OR_CONCEPT_CRITICISM][REVIEW_LONG][REVIEW_SUMMARY] Michel Huysseune, Département de Science politique, Université Libre de Bruxel — https://sci-hub.se/https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10767-019-09335-6 — «Banfield’s book displays only the sketchiest interest in Italy itself; its history, as that ofChiaromonte, remains almost entirely absent from the book», «This choice of a non-scholarly work as the only acknowledged Italian reading effectively eliminates Italy as a locus of academicallyaccepted theoretical production.», «They firstly put limits on the broader relevance of Banfield’s research, a point on which hedisplayed himself, as noted above, a considerable ambivalence.», «The second set of critiques concerns the interpretation of Banfield’s research outcomes.Frank Cancian outlines how Banfield’s conclusion on an ethos of amoral familism assumes alogical connection between attachment to the family and feelings of insecurity on the one handand self-interested actions on the other that he cannot prove.», «A third set of critiques of Banfield’s approach concerns causality. Banfield’s own interest inchildhood socialization raised little interest and, when mentioned, seems to have been dismissed as an explanation», «Later assessments of Banfield’s work amongst anthropologists (e.g. Pitkin 1985, p.210; Herzfeld 1997, p. 156; Schneider and Schneider 2003, p.110) are predominantly negative, but with only a limited impact outside the boundaries of that discipline», «He later published personalreminiscences on his meeting in Rome with Banfield in 1953, expressing his impression that Banfield came toItaly with a pre-set hypothesis for which he wanted to find confirmation», « The continued popularity of theconcept of amoral familism hence reveals the persistent appeal of such myths of superiorityand their embeddedness in the social sciences», «Maria Carmela Agodi observes fromher side how often even those authors who reject Banfield quote him, as if his concept were anarchetype that cannot be ignored», «To start with, most recent defenders of Banfieldrarely engage with the concept itself. They generally have no research experience withsouthern Italy and take the existence of amoral familism for granted and use it as anundiscussed starting point for their own research agenda», «Beginning with critiques ofBanfield’s fieldwork, these scholars, under the influence of postcolonial theory, have increas-ingly become more self-confident and intellectually sophisticated in their rejection of Banfield.», «Undoubtedly, Banfield’s rhetoric skill, acknowledged by many of his critics, plays a role inexplaining his success: the touch of realism of his sketch of village life, and his own authoriallack of self-doubt give the book’s narrative and consequently its argument the air of a self-evident truth. It is only a careful reading of the volume that allows to discern that part of the material he provides contradicts in fact his own theory, as Alessio Colombis has pointed out», «Thereluctance to question these assumptions explains why defenders of amoral familism rarelyengage with its critics and why the controversies surrounding the concept are indeed never-ending»

[REVIEW_LONG][REVIEW_SUMMARY] Emmanuele Ferragina, University of Oxford — https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-01314030/document — https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-01314030/document — «According to them, Banfield’s approach was stereotypical and simplistic, disregarding completely the historical development of the south.», «Success can also be attributed to Banfield for providing a simple and straightforward explanation for a problem that has interested generations of writers, philosophers and social scientists. It has been said that, ‘Theories that won’t die are those that confirm our most basic assumptions’ (Thompson 2005: 446). Amoral familism doubtless belongs to this category of theories.», «Liberal scholars often accused him of reshaping old theories in an appealing way to affirm a conservative political ideology.», «The success of Banfield’s work is dictated by the clarity of his propositions; the main drawback is the lack of data to support his hypothesis. His approach has often been regarded as methodologically incorrect», «The first section is dedicated to Rossi-Doria’s arguments about the agrarian origins of southern backwardness. The second concentrates on the initial anthropological and sociological criticisms of Banfield. The third develops the criticisms advanced by Colombis in the 1970s. The fourth looks at the debate about the relationship between family structure and economic development in the 1980s and 1990s.», «The first sociological critique, mainly a methodological one, was formulated by Marselli (1963) in his article ‘American sociologists and Italian peasant society: with reference to the book of Banfield’. Marselli rejected Banfield’s methodology, focusing on the incoherence between the strong conclusions of the latter’s work and the fieldwork he had conducted on which they were based.», «Bias and inaccuracies in Banfield’s analysis: Colombis’s criticism», «Banfield’s theory was merely an over-simplification of reality, and amoral familism rapidly became a national habitus that was also accepted outside the academic world», «Nevertheless, more than fifty years after its publication, The moral basis of a backward society remains a book of great importance in the field of the social sciences.», «In the 1970s and 1980s, scholars on southern Italian societyroutinely critiqued Banfield for his neglect of structures of intermediate solidarity, such as neighbourhoods and larger family networks», «Lupo rejects Banfield’s research in its entirety, on both meth-odological and deontological grounds, as an example of contemporary orientalism. Hemoreover observes the existence in southern Italy, like in Latin America, of a syndromeof self-depreciation characterized by the acceptance of stereotypes provided by outsiders», «They point out thatBanfield, but also Putnam and Fukuyama, use culture in a reified way, as a stable setof norms and expectations, while contemporary anthropologists, cultural historians andcultural studies scholars have highlighted how much culture is unstable and conflictual»

[ADDITIONAL_READING] Фукуяма — «Доверие»;

Алмонд, Верба — «Гражданская культура»,

Роберт Патнэм — «Заставить демократию работать»

Marie Jahoda — «Marienthal: The Sociography of an Unemployed Community»

[BOOK_SERIES] Библиотека свободы

[NO_SCEDRECO]
-->
1. [Бэнфилд Эдвард](https://www.nationalaffairs.com/publications/detail/edward-banfield-revisited) — Моральные основы отсталого общества (Новое издательство, 2019).pdf

<a id="Общество-спектакля"></a>
## Общество спектакля

<!--- [BOOK_SUPPORT] Программа «Пушкин» при поддержке министерства иностранных дел Франции и посольства Франции в России

[ACADEMIC_DEGREE] Не нашёл информации об учёных степенях Дебора и деятельности, которую можно назвать профессиональной.

[BOOK_SCEDRECO] La Société du spectacle — https://sci-hub.se/10.1598/JAAL.51.1.7 , https://sci-hub.se/https://www.jstor.org/stable/24469755 . Проходит в категорию «философы»; учёные рассматривали его работы.

[ADDITIONAL_READING] Jennings Bryant, Peter Vorderer — Psychology of Entertainment

Neil Postman — Amusing Ourselves to Death. Public DIscourse in the Age of Show Business

-->
1. [Дебор Ги](https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guy_Debord) — Общество спектакля (Логос, 2000).djvu

<a id="Российское-общество"></a>
## Российское общество

<a id="Общественное-мнение-россиян-середины-нулевых"></a>
### Общественное мнение россиян середины нулевых

<!--- [NOTE] Как «научный редактор» указана Щадилова Каринэ Акоповна, которая в интернете упоминается как «литературный редактор» — https://sociologica.hse.ru/data/2011/03/04/1211598585/soc_oboz_8_3.pdf , «журналист» — http://arch.eu.spb.ru/object/15217 . Ввиду данного обстоятельства категория снижена. -->
1. [ВЦИОМ](https://social.hse.ru/soc/vciom/about) — Политический словарь нашего времени (ЦСП, 2006).pdf

<a id="Отношения"></a>
# Отношения

<a id="Теория-реализации-ценностей"></a>
## Теория реализации ценностей

<!--- [ACADEMIC_DEGREE] [Personal site, CV](http://www.valerietiberius.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/Tiberius-CV-August-2019.pdf) — «Ph.D. in philosophy — University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, August 1997. Thesis: Deliberation About the Good.»

[ACADEMIC_DEGREE_REVIEWERS][ACADEMIC_DEGREE_CONSULTANTS] «Very special thanks are due to Mike Bishop and Paul Bloomfield who provided detailed, generous, and constructive feedback on the manuscript, as well as needed encouragement at crucial moments. Gwen Bradford also provided challenging and extremely helpful comments on the manuscript. I hope to have done some justice to this feedback.

Justin Ivory read the manuscript with care and provided excellent research assistance in the last stretches of writing. Colin DeYoung also deserves special thanks for keeping me on track empirically, and for putting up with all sorts of questions about psychology to which he invariably supplied comprehensible answers at the drop of a hat.»

[ACADEMIC_DEGREE_REVIEWERS] Mike Bishop, [Florida State University](https://philosophy.fsu.edu/people/faculty/michael-bishop) — «Ph.D., University of California San Diego. Research Interests — Philosophy of Psychology/Mind, Epistemology, Value Theory»

Paul Bloomfield, [University of Connecticut](https://bloomfield.philosophy.uconn.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/1748/2016/06/Bloomfield-CV.pdf) — «1995: Ph.D., Philosophy, Syracuse University»

Gwen Bradford, [Rice University, CV](https://cpb-us-e1.wpmucdn.com/blogs.rice.edu/dist/3/819/files/2019/11/CV-October-2019.pdf) — «Yale University, Philosophy Department Ph.D., 2010»

Colin G DeYoung, [University of Minnesota, College of Liberal Arts](https://cla.umn.edu/about/directory/profile/cdeyoung) — «Ph.D.: Psychology, University of Toronto, 2005»

[NO_ACADEMIC_DEGREE_CONSULTANTS] Justin P Ivory, [University of Minnesota, College of Liberal Arts](https://cla.umn.edu/about/directory/profile/ivory017) — «B.A.: Philosophy, Bethel University, Arden Hills, MN, 2013»

[ADDITIONAL_READING] Valerie Tiberius — «Deliberation about the Good: Justifying What We Value»

Valerie Tiberius — «The Reflective Life: Living Wisely with our Limits»

Valerie Tiberius — «Moral Psychology: A Contemporary Introduction»

Paul Bloomfield — «The Virtues of Happiness: A Theory of the Good Life»

[POSITIVE_OR_NEUTRAL_REVIEW] Jason R. Raibley, University of Kansas, [Ethics](https://www.academia.edu/45575166/Review_of_Tiberius_Well_being_as_Value_fulfillment) — «In Well-Being as Value Fulfillment, Valerie Tiberius formulates a value fulfillment theory of well-being that illuminates how to be a good and helpful friend.», «Tiberius succeeds: the value fulfillment theory derives considerable supportfrom how it analyzes practical problems relating to caring relationships.», «Her bookalso stands apart for the perspective and good judgment it consistently exemplifies and for the fine quality of the writing.», «The book contains many important insights about what we would need to do in order to be better friends, and it details some empirically informed strategies for coping with common problems.», «A first question for Tiberius regards the significance of appropriate values.Tiberius tends to present her view as a theory about what makes a life overall bestfor the person who lives it», «But if this is Tiberius’s view,it is quite similar to desire fulfillment theories: the main difference is merely thatvalues are more psychologically complex than desires. The appropriateness of val-ues and their diachronic compatibility have merely instrumental significance, justlike a value’s compatibility with health or psychological happiness.», «A second question pertains to Tiberius’s discussion in chapter 5 of the valueof humility as it relates to being a good friend.», «There is no doubt that self-absorption is an obstacle to caring relationshipsand personal well-being (and obnoxious in its own right). But though the desiredeffects of decenteredness are clear enough, it is a little hard to make out what it is,or how to achieve it.», «But which of our own values must weretain, and which must we leave behind, in order to do this? And are there limits,here, that sometimes make empathy impossible? It remains a bit unclear whatdecenteredness involves and how it would help with the really hard cases de-scribed earlier in the book», «These problems are difficult, but the book makes progress in developing andlaying out the evidence for the value fulfillment theory and in exploring the dy-namics of healthy, caring relationships.»

Polly Mitchell, School of Education, Communication and Society, King’s College London, Waterloo Bridge Wing FWB, [Analysis](https://academic.oup.com/analysis/article/80/1/196/5670567) — «Valerie Tiberius’s Well-Being as Value Fulfillment: How We Can Help Each Other to Live Well makes a thoughtful, realistic and persuasive contribution to the philosophy of well-being.», «But underlying this is a theory of well-being that presents a credible alternative to the views that predominate the literature.», «Tiberius’s writing is refreshingly unpretentious and straightforward, without compromising intellectual rigour.», «Consequently, her ambition to say something about some of the practical ethical questions that confront us is, I think, unusually successful. It is regrettably rare that philosophical writing about well-being provokes serious contemplation about how to live a better life, and that her account elicits such reflection seems to me to be a clear sign that an awful lot of what Tiberius says is on the mark.», «The status of total value fulfilment is somewhat unclear. We might conceive of it as a goal that all of us in fact value. Or it might be something which we necessarily value. So, perhaps, in virtue of having other values, we also value total value fulfilment.», «The second, modal interpretation is unconvincing. Tiberius’ account of valuing implies that we have reason to pursue and value those things that we already value, and it tells us that some values are more or less appropriate for us. However, it doesn’t give us reason to value things other than those things that we already value, and it doesn’t give us reason to have any second-order values – to value having values, for instance.», «The second, modal interpretation is unconvincing. Tiberius’ account of valuing implies that we have reason to pursue and value those things that we already value, and it tells us that some values are more or less appropriate for us. However, it doesn’t give us reason to value things other than those things that we already value, and it doesn’t give us reason to have any second-order values – to value having values, for instance.», «However, this raises questions about the normative adequacy of the theory. Tiberius argues that theories of well-being should be normatively adequate: that is, they should tell us what’s good about well-being and why we should value it. But a normative interpretation of total value fulfilment merely asserts rather than explains the value of overall well-being.»

[BOOK_OR_AUTHOR_OR_CONCEPT_CRITICISM] Bernard Reginster, Brown University, [Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews](https://ndpr.nd.edu/reviews/well-being-as-value-fulfillment-how-we-can-help-each-other-to-live-well/) — «There is much to like in Tiberius' perceptive explorations: the quest for well-being a friend's or one's own can be complicated business», «Conflicts between our desires and feelings and our value judgments do seem to affect our well-being, but how they do so in the VFT is somewhat ambiguous.», «Intuitively, the life of a depressive does not go well for her. But it is not clear how the VFT would accommodate this intuition. If the person truly cares about nothing, then she does not care about that either. n the absence of values, to be sure, there is no sense in which her life could go well for her. But to insist, as Tiberius does, that her life goes "badly" for her appears to violate the strictures of the theory, since it makes her well-being depend on facts that transcend her evaluative perspective.», «This is a tantalizing move but I am not sure I see how, in the context of the VFT, it solves the problem. This invites the supposition that self-sacrifice is an act in which the agent sacrifices her well-being for the sake of something else she considers more important. Is there conceptual room for such a possibility in the VFT?», « In any event, her explicit aim is not to establish the superiority of that theory over existing competing theories, but to show that it deserves consideration. In this regard, her book is fully successful. Moreover, as I noted at the beginning, the book's richness also resides in the practical wisdom it imparts, much of which I regrettably could not consider here.»

[Kr/Mono]

[ADDITIONAL_READING] Martha C. Nussbaum — «Women and Human Development: The Capabilities Approach»

-->
1. Tiberius Valerie — Well-Being as Value Fulfillment. How We Can Help Each Other to Live Well (Oxford University Press, 2018).pdf

<a id="Питание"></a>
# Питание

<a id="Веганское-питание"></a>
## Веганское питание

<!--- [INFO] Vesanto — MS, RD. «Master of science» — это магистр, не учёная степень — https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Master_of_Science .

[CRIM] Дэвис — спикер, https://www.foodasmedicinesummittx.com/brenda-davis , https://www.preventionofdisease.org/brenda-davis
-->
1. [Davis Brenda](https://www.healthscience.org/sites/default/files/documents/publications/feature/Health%20Science%20Winter%202019_Interview_Davis.pdf), [Vesanto Melina](https://sci-hub.se/10.1016/j.jand.2016.09.025) — Becoming Vegan. Comprehensive edition. The complete reference to plant-based nutrition (Book Publishing Company, 2014).pdf
<!--- [INFO] Не нашёл критики книги.
Норрис, согласно собственному сайту, зарегистрированный диетолог, как и Мессина — https://jacknorrisrd.com/about/

[NOTE] В русском переводе — «Как стать веганом (Ганга, 2019).pdf» — https://rutracker.org/forum/viewtopic.php?p=80591583#80591583 убрана вся библиография и сноски.

[AUTHOR_PROJECT] Проект Норриса — Vegan Outreach — https://veganoutreach.org/ , https://veganhealth.org

[INFO] RD — «зарегистрированный диетолог». Из того, что я прочитал, сделал вывод, что RD — достаточно для профессионала, но недостаточно для учёного — https://www.cdrnet.org/rd-eligibility -->
1. Norris Jack, [Messina Virginia](https://oldwayspt.org/bio/virginia-messina-mph-rd) — Vegan for Life. Everything You Need to Know to Be Healthy and Fit on a Plant-Based Diet (Da Capo Press, 2011).pdf

<a id="Веганское-питание-для-мозга"></a>
### Веганское питание для мозга

<a id="NR-47"></a>
#### NR

<a id="Недостоверная-информация-7"></a>
##### Недостоверная информация

<!--- [INFO] Барнард — MD.

[NOTE] “but the name of the organization is entirely misleading. It is not about responsible medical practice. It is entirely and exclusively about promoting vegan eating. A laudable cause to be sure, but I prefer truth in advertising.” — https://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2014/02/vegetarians-and-their-superior-blood/284036/

[NOTE] Критика Барнарда — https://www.sciencemediacentre.co.nz/2008/12/08/experts-criticise-claims-in-new-diabetes-book/ , https://sciencebasedmedicine.org/medicine-is-hard-and-should-be-practiced-with-caution/ -->
1. [Барнард Нил](https://www.mcspotlight.org/people/biogs/barnard.html) — Питание для мозга. Эффективная пошаговая методика для усиления эффективности работы мозга (Эксмо, 2014).epub

<a id="Клише-и-мифы-о-веганском-питании"></a>
### Клише и мифы о веганском питании

<a id="NR-48"></a>
#### NR

<a id="Непрофессионализм-9"></a>
##### Непрофессионализм

<!--- [ACADEMIC_DEGREE] «Niko Rittenau absolvierte ein Bachelorstudium in Ernährungsberatung und ein Masterstudium in Mikronährstofftherapie und Regulationsmedizin» — https://www.nikorittenau.com/about/ . Бакалавр/магистр — недостаточно для книг на тему питания.

[INFO] «Regulationsmedizin» и «Mikronährstofftherapie» — названия выглядят подозрительно, но не нашёл прямых указаний, что это псевдонаука. Есть материал про «intravenous micronutrient therapy» — https://sciencebasedmedicine.org/the-ftc-cracks-down-on-the-company-selling-iv-bars-for-false-advertising-claims/ .

[CRIM] Спикер — https://www.nikorittenau.com/

[NO_PDF] -->
1. Rittenau Niko — Vegan-Klischee ade! Wissenschaftliche Antworten auf kritische Fragen zu veganer Ernährung (Ventil Verlag, 2018).epub

<a id="Вегетарианское-питание"></a>
## Вегетарианское питание

<!--- [INFO] Большой «List of Contributors». Возможно, первая категория.

[INFO] Не нашёл научной критики книги или Мариотти 

[NOTE] Page 14 — «The term vegetarian will be used in this volume to include all categories of vegetarian diets and vegetarians without distinction, i.e., all diets excluding meat and fish, regardless of whether other animal products such as dairy and/or eggs are also excluded.»
-->
1. [Mariotti François](https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=M-fl0R4AAAAJ) (edited by) — Vegetarian and Plant-Based Diets in Health and Disease Prevention (Academic Press, 2017).pdf

<a id="Питание-для-мозга"></a>
## Питание для мозга

<a id="NR-49"></a>
### NR

<a id="Паранаучные-утверждения"></a>
#### Паранаучные утверждения

<!--- [INFO] Associate Professor of Neuroscience in Neurology, 2016
Associate Professor of Neuroscience in Radiology, 2019

[CRIM_SPEAKER] https://www.ted.com/speakers/lisa_mosconi

[NOTE] Критика книги со стороны доктора медицины Харриет «SkepDoc» Холл — https://sciencebasedmedicine.org/mosconis-brain-food-diet/ . Возможно, её достаточно, чтобы отправить книгу Москони в категорию «Ad».

[NO_PDF] -->
1. [Москони Лайза](https://vivo.weill.cornell.edu/display/cwid-lim2035) — [Диета для ума. Научный подход к питанию для здоровья и долголетия](https://sciencebasedmedicine.org/mosconis-brain-food-diet/) (Манн, Иванов и Фербер, 2018).epub

<a id="Рациональное-питание"></a>
## Рациональное питание

<a id="NR-50"></a>
### NR

<a id="Недостоверная-информация-8"></a>
#### Недостоверная информация

<!--- [NOTE] Предвзятое освещение главы «О пользе и вреде вегетарианства». Современный научный консенсус стоит на том, что правильное вегетарианство не вредит здоровью — https://veganwiki.ru/%D0%9E%D1%84%D0%B8%D1%86%D0%B8%D0%B0%D0%BB%D1%8C%D0%BD%D1%8B%D0%B5_%D0%BF%D0%BE%D0%B7%D0%B8%D1%86%D0%B8%D0%B8_%D0%BC%D0%B5%D0%B4%D0%B8%D1%86%D0%B8%D0%BD%D1%81%D0%BA%D0%B8%D1%85_%D0%B8_%D0%B4%D0%B8%D0%B5%D1%82%D0%BE%D0%BB%D0%BE%D0%B3%D0%B8%D1%87%D0%B5%D1%81%D0%BA%D0%B8%D1%85_%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%B3%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B7%D0%B0%D1%86%D0%B8%D0%B9_%D0%BE%D1%82%D0%BD%D0%BE%D1%81%D0%B8%D1%82%D0%B5%D0%BB%D1%8C%D0%BD%D0%BE_%D0%B2%D0%B5%D0%B3%D0%B0%D0%BD%D1%81%D1%82%D0%B2%D0%B0 .

[NOTE] Цитаты: «вегетарианцы исключают из питания людей все животные «убойные» продукты (…) но в то же время весьма непоследовательно с медицинской точки зрения допускают питание яйцами, молоком, молочными продуктами», «вегетарианство явилось своеобразной и в значительной степени ханжеской реакцией буржуазной интеллигенции на промышленный переворот и колониальное процветание», «Вегетарианские ограничения неприемлемы и тягостны», «Буквально каждый год возникают все новые и новые "направления" и "школы", авторы которых рекомендуют очередную панацею, призванную якобы "сохранить" или даже "укрепить" здоровье поверивших им людей: вегетарианство, сухоедение, спасительное голодание, фруктово-молочные диеты, раздельное питание, метод Шаталовой и т. д. и т. п.», «По глубокому убеждению приверженцев вегетарианства, мясо подвергается в кишечнике человека разложению с выделением трупного яда, который отравляет не только наш организм, но и нашу психику. Поедая трупы убитых животных и рыб, мы связываем себя с теми комплексами ужаса, страха и предсмертной тоски, что охватывали несчастных животных перед смертью.», «Наконец-то, анализируя вегетарианство, мы подошли к наиглавнейшей, а именно физиологически обоснованной причине вегетарианства. Причине, по которой истинный вегетарианец, будь он даже несведущ в идеологии, этике и всей философии вегетарианства, предпочел бы мясу растительную пищу. Так что нравственность здесь ни при чём.»

[ADDITIONAL_READING] Ирина Брехт — «Правильное питание как минное поле» -->
1. [Тутельян Виктор Александрович](https://www.sechenov.ru/univers/about_lecturer/2381/) (под редакцией) — Научные основы здорового питания (Панорама, 2010).pdf

<a id="Паранаучные-утверждения-1"></a>
#### Паранаучные утверждения

<!--- [BOOK_CRITICISM] https://zen.yandex.ru/media/id/5c58138625d7b000b1b3b585/ljedietologiia-ch1-kak-himichit-nash-organizm-principy-pravilnogo-pitaniia-konstantin-zabolotnyi-5cac7732028a6700afd94a32 , https://zen.yandex.ru/media/id/5c58138625d7b000b1b3b585/ljedietologiia-ch2-kak-himichit-nash-organizm-principy-pravilnogo-pitaniia-konstantin-zabolotnyi-5cadf588baeeed00b958cf4e , https://zen.yandex.com/media/id/5c58138625d7b000b1b3b585/ljedietologiia-ch3-kak-himichit-nash-organizm-principy-pravilnogo-pitaniia-konstantin-zabolotnyi-5cae3b83d2cbe600b132600d

[ACADEMIC_DEGREE] Аттестованный преподаватель общественной академии «Российская ассоциация народной медицины» — https://healthfond.ru/zabolotniy . Организация похожа на другие общественные академии вроде РАЕН.

[BOOK_SERIES] Доказательно о медицине

[NO_SCANNED_PDF] -->
1. Заболотный Константин Борисович — Как химичит наш организм. Принципы правильного питания (АСТ, 2018).pdf

<a id="Повседневность"></a>
# Повседневность

<a id="Революция-повседневной-жизни"></a>
## Революция повседневной жизни

<!--- [BOOK_SERIES] Час Ч -->
1. Ванейгем Рауль — Трактат об умении жить для молодых поколений (Гилея, 2005).fb2

<a id="Политика"></a>
# Политика

<a id="Введение-в-политологию"></a>
## Введение в политологию

<a id="NR-51"></a>
### NR

<a id="Непрофессионализм-10"></a>
#### Непрофессионализм

<!--- [NO_ACADEMIC_OR_PROFESSIONAL_DEGREE_EDITOR] Аксёнова Мария Дмитриевна, [личный сайт](http://aksenova.ru/about/biography/) — «Закончила с красным дипломом механико-математический факультет Московского государственного университета им. М.В. Ломоносова. Потом освоила ещё профессии: издатель, автор познавательных статей и книг, предприниматель, телеведущая.»

[NO_EDITORS_INFO] Я не нашёл информации о главном редакторе — Олеге Вавилове — и ответственных редакторах тома — Ирине Меркине и Ирине Упадышеве, имеющих отношение к политологии

[NO_ACADEMIC_OR_PROFESSIONAL_DEGREE] Эйдельман Тамара Натановна, [Arzamas](https://arzamas.academy/) — «Преподаватель истории, заслуженный учитель России, заведующая кафедрой истории в гимназии № 1567»

Яловицына Светлана Эрккиевна, [Карельский научный центр Российской академии наук](http://www.krc.karelia.ru/member.php?id=923&plang=r) — «кандидат исторических наук, старший научный сотрудник Сектора истории Института языка, литературы и истории КарНЦ РАН»

Друбачевская Ирина Леонидовна, [Многопрофильная средняя образовательная школа права и экономики](http://leschool.ru/drubachevskaya-irina-leonidovna/) — «учитель истории и обществознания»

Кушнерёва Юлия Викторовна, [Школа №67 Москвы](https://sch67.mskobr.ru/teacher-card/yuliya_viktorovna_kushneryova) — «учитель истории и обществознания»

[NO_AUTHORS_INFO] Не нашёл Ирину Упадышеву, Александра Кожанова, Алексея Кузнецова и Светлану Зотову, имеющих отношение к политологии

[DUPLICATE_GI]

[NO_SOURCES][NO_REVIEW] -->
1. Меркина Ирина, Упадышева Ирина — Энциклопедия для детей. Том 27. Политика (Мир энциклопедий Аванта+, 2012).pdf

<a id="Выборы"></a>
## Выборы

<a id="Вызывание-электоральным-фундаментализмом-синдрома-демократической-усталости"></a>
### Вызывание электоральным фундаментализмом синдрома демократической усталости

<!--- [ACADEMIC_DEGREE] Ph.D from Leiden University. Before becoming a fulltime writer, he was a postdoctoral research fellow at the Department of History at the Katholieke Universiteit Leuven — https://nias.knaw.nl/fellow/reybrouck-d-g-van/ ; He studied archaeology and philosophy at the universities of Leuven and Cambridge and obtained his PhD in Leiden. — https://www.europeanpressprize.com/laureate/david-van-reybrouck/ . Не политолог, поэтому категория ниже.

[AUTHOR_PROJECT] G1000, Platform for democratic innovation — http://www.g1000.org/en/

[POSITIVE_OR_NEUTRAL_REVIEW][REVIEW_RETELLING] Галина Елагина, МГУ — https://www.elibrary.ru/download/elibrary_39252462_68753182.pdf

Ramón A. Feenstra, Universitat Jaume I de Castelló (España) — http://www.scielo.org.mx/pdf/trf/n57/0188-6649-trf-57-461.pdf — «Además, los resultados de estos experimentos contradicen, según van Reybrouck, cualquier sospecha de incapacidad de la ciudadanía para participar en la política, tales como las lanzadas por autores como Schumpeter (1984) o Sartori (1999).», «Un desarrollo más sistemático de lo que podría ser un modelo de democracia bi-representativa permitiría profundizar en los mecanismos concretos, así como definir la relación o la complementariedad entre sorteo y elección.»

[REVIEW_RETELLING] Gabriel Camarelles Queralt, Universitat Jaume I — https://www.raco.cat/index.php/RecercaPensamentAnalisi/article/view/355860/447827

[BOOK_OR_AUTHOR_OR_CONCEPT_CRITICISM] Ben Margulies, Postdoctoral Fellow at the University of Warwick — https://eprints.lse.ac.uk/68437/1/LSE%20RB%20Book%20Review%20Against%20Elections%20by%20David%20Van%20Reybrouck.pdf — «It is unlikely even the most educated, wonkishvoter would find such a Rube Goldberg machine an attractive model.», «That, and his considerable andwell-presented historical research, make this book well worth reading. But in an age of such profound citizendissatisfaction, it is far from clear we can leave something as central as representation to mere chance; leavingthings to the supposedly ‘aleatory’ justice of the market is, after all, part of what got us into this mess.»;

Edward Mortimer, the Deputy Editor of the RUSI Journal — https://sci-hub.se/10.1080/03071847.2019.1621494 — «Van Reybrouck certainly acknowledges the important consequences of restricting suffrage, but this does not lead him to engage with the fundamental question that this engenders: would an electoral-representative model with more extensive suffrage still have supported a new aristocratic elite?», «For all the criticisms levelled against them, parties have nonetheless provided a place to synthesise disparate agendas and provide the structures to make their policies appeal to voters without resorting to violence. Perhaps this can be achieved in some other way. However, to propose changing the system without at least acknowledging the positive role played by parties is an important weakness.», «However, his exposition would benefit from a little more caution given that political scientists have so few cases to study. Sortition has yet to be used on such a scale, so it is difficult to know whether it would enhance decision-making or ameliorate some of the problems Van Reybrouck claims we are experiencing.», «There is only one mention of the problematic imposition of electoral models in states such as Timor Leste, Afghanistan and Iraq (p. 39). Van Reybrouck’s observation of the failure of electoral processes in these countries is on safe ground and it is unfortunate that the book does not further examine non-Western cases.»
-->
1. Ван Рейбрук Давид Грегори — Против выборов (Ад Маргинем Пресс, 2013).pdf

<a id="Демократия"></a>
## Демократия

<a id="Возникновение-и-консолидация-демократии"></a>
### Возникновение и консолидация демократии

<!--- [ACADEMIC_DEGREE] Аджемоглу — London School of Economics, PhD — https://economics.mit.edu/faculty/acemoglu/cv ; Robinson — Ph.D., Yale University, https://harris.uchicago.edu/files/2020-01/robinsoncv2020.pdf

[ACADEMIC_DEGREE_EDITORS] Научные редакторы — Леонид Иосифович Полищук, кандидат экономических наук — https://www.hse.ru/org/persons/65104 , Георгий Равильевич Сюняев, кандидат экономических наук — https://www.hse.ru/org/persons/14298241 , кандидат экономических наук Натхов Тимур Владимирович — https://www.hse.ru/staff/natkhov

[POSITIVE_OR_NEUTRAL_REVIEW] John S. Ahlquist, University of Washington — https://sci-hub.se/10.1177/0010414007301149 — «Theparsimony of their argument, combined with the astonishing breadth of its implica-tions and the significant difficulties in empirical testing, will surely fuel much pro-ductive research. A well-worn copy of the book should be on the shelves ofcomparativists, political economists, and students of development»;

Allan Drazen, University of Maryland — https://sci-hub.se/10.1111/j.1468-0297.2007.02031_1.x — «Lest this sound too forbidding, the book should be accessible toany graduate student in economics or political science with standard microeconomictraining.», « In short, I think their theory of democratisation may bemore limited than they suggest but it is a powerful model in many cases.», «Here I found unwarranted both the basic assumption that after transition todemocracy the masses are fully committed to democracy and its implication that theycan therefore essentially be taken for granted.», «Many analyses often seem incomplete because they lack discussion of explicit mechanisms on howhigher income or less income inequality lead to the adoption and consolidation ofdemocracy.», «This is an extremely impressive book and will no doubt shape both the research agendaof people working on democratisation and democratic consolidation and the model-ling choices they make»

Bruno Amable, University of Paris 1, Stefano Palombarini, University of Paris 8 — https://sci-hub.se/https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00712-007-0277-z — «The distinction betweenelites and citizens is not altered by political transformations, which means that it is not possible to account for a conflict whose aim or simply whoseeffect would be to transform the distinction between elites and citizens using Acemoglu and Johnson’s framework. Finally, the empirical contribution of the book does not match the theo-retical effort. In rapidly presenting the historical cases of Great Britain, Argentina, Singapore and South Africa, the authors seem to look for anillustration of their theory and do not seek to propose a convincing analysis.», «In spite of these criticisms, Acemoglu and Robinson’s book is a veryimportant contribution to institutional economics, which usually focuses onthe impact of institutions on the economy and looks for the most efficientinstitutions but generally neglects the analysis of the concrete forces that leadto the emergence of an institution.»

Oren M. Levin-Waldman, Metropolitan College of New York — https://sci-hub.se/10.1080/09538250902871659 — «But the reduction ofgrand theory and empirical analysis into econometric modeling is also perhapsits greatest failing. Readers are introduced to different paths to political develop-ment through the cases of Great Britain, Argentina, Singapore and South Africa», «To compare Great Britain to Argentina one has to ask what institutionsBritain has that Argentina does not. The authors do not really focus on economicdevelopment and economic structure», «But they do not explore the relationship between inequality and theeconomic structure of society.», «Acemoglu & Robinson also fail to address how larger trends of globalizationand trade imbalances affect inequality, and just how these forces might stokepolitical unrest.»

加 藤 晋 — https://jww.iss.u-tokyo.ac.jp/jss/pdf/jss6402_189194.pdf

[BOOK_OR_AUTHOR_OR_CONCEPT_CRITICISM] Peter Boettke, George Mason University — https://sci-hub.se/https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10602-007-9025-1 — «So do the stories that Acemoglu and Robinson construct fit the facts? And do theyring true?», «But there are also analytical sins ofomission in Acemoglu and Robinson’s ambitious book. The most egregiousomission is the failure to cite and discuss the work of James M. Buchanan on thetime consistency problem and credible commitment at the core of the analysis of government», «The sins of omission are not limited to Buchanan’s foundational contribution tothe field he created—constitutional political economy—but also to other morerecent work in the field: Kuran’s work on preference falsification and revolutions;Weingast’s work on the paradox of governance and on how market-preservingfederalism can serve as institutional solution to the commitment problem; Rodrik’swork on promises, and the idea of policy overshooting to signal commitment; Olson’s work on the intricate institutional matrix that is required for countries torealize the extensive benefits of the gains from specialization and trade; andShleifer’s work on predation and institutional possibilities in coping with thegrabbing hand of the state on the one hand, and the opportunism of private actors onthe other.», «My point is the simple one that the claim to originality in Acemoglu and Robinson on the analytical front is ‘‘thin’’ and the historical narrative offered is a bit‘‘forced’’.», «Unfortunately, this conclusion, likeseveral other aspects of the book, runs into the problems of being factual and being true.», «Acemoglu and Robinson’s analysis of concessions and redistributiondoesn’t quite get the story right.»

[PARTIALLY_SPECIALISED]

[BOOK_SERIES] Политическая теория

[ADDITIONAL_READING] Dambisa Moyo — «Edge of Chaos: Why Democracy Is Failing to Deliver Economic Growth and How to Fix It»

Dambisa Moyo — «How the West Was Lost»
 -->
1. Аджемоглу Дарон, Робинсон Джеймс — Экономические истоки диктатуры и демократии (Высшая школа экономики, 2015).pdf

<a id="Эволюционный-подход-к-исследованию-демократии"></a>
### Эволюционный подход к исследованию демократии

<!--- [INFO] Рецензенты — 2 доктора политических наук -->
1. [Баранов Николай Алексеевич](https://voenmeh.ru/component/comprofiler/userprofile/baranov_na) — Современная демократия. Эволюционный подход (БГТУ Военмех, 2007).pdf

<a id="Наука-и-власть"></a>
## Наука и власть

<a id="Внедрение-власти-научного-знания"></a>
### Внедрение власти научного знания

<!--- [ACADEMIC_DEGREE] Грюндманн, PhD in Political and Social Sciences from the European University Institute, Florence — https://www.nottingham.ac.uk/sociology/people/reiner.grundmann . Штер — Ph.D. (Sociology): University of Oregon — https://www.asanet.org/sites/default/files/savvy/taskforce/New%20Folder/Nico_Stehr_cv.pdf

[POSITIVE_OR_NEUTRAL_REVIEW] Frank Hartmann, Professor für Geschichte und Theorie der Visuellen Kommunikation an der Bauhaus-Universität Weimar — https://www.recherche-online.net/texte/frank-hartmann-kritik-der-kognitiven-autoritaet/

Назаренко Александр Павлович — https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/formula-grundmanna-shtera-peremennye-uspeha-nauchnogo-znaniya-retsenziya-na-knigu-r-grundmann-n-shter-vlast-nauchnogo-znaniya-spb-aleteyya/pdf — «. Основная проблема в изучении климата состоит в том, что не существует консенсуса среди ученых об истинных масштабах угрозы, а также влияния на нее антропо‑генного фактора.» — консенсус по данным вопросам как раз существует (прим. ред.), «Таким образом, формула успеха научного знания в политиче‑ском поле для Штера и Грундманна состоит из интерпретативных схем и знания per se. В рецензии мы хотели показать, что в этих пе‑ременных имеются погрешности.»

Michael Reay, Swarthmore College — https://sci-hub.se/10.1177/0094306115570271s — «Howev-er, it must be said that their presentation heretends to jump rather unevenly between levelsof detail and between primary sources, sec-ondary works, and detailed textual critiquesof alternative explanations, such that themain arguments are sometimes hard to follow. At the same time, the fact that the data are not used to support a grand theory means of course that some major issues remain unresolved. It is unclear, for example, how different expert roles work and how splitting them up into various categories helps explain what is going on.», «It is alsounclear how arecognitionof the differentfunctions of expert knowledge—such asframing, justifying, and influencing belief—can be turned into a theory», «Finally, one can wonder if the overallimpact of uncertainty is greater than it seemswhen focusing mainly on policy practicality»

[BOOK_OR_AUTHOR_OR_CONCEPT_CRITICISM][REVIEW_WRONG] Лиана Анваровна Тухватулина – аспирант сектора социальной эпистемологии Института философии РАН — https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/vlast-pod-vyveskoy-nauki/pdf — «Отмечу, что Грундманн и Штер совсем не уделяют внимания проблеме «власти» фундаментальной науки социально-политическим аспектам направлений её развития. По-видимому, способ постановки проблемы, предложенный ими, попросту не позволяет качественно анализировать данный вопрос, поскольку феномен фундаментальной науки не укладывается в то достаточно узкое определение знания, которое предлагают авторы.», «Тем не менее история кейнсианства, рассмотренная Грундманном и Штером, едва ли служит аргументом в пользу тезиса о том, что научное знание может моделировать политическую повестку дня», «анализ Грундманна и Штера не представляется достаточным для подтверждения заявленного ими тезиса о влиянии научной программы на политический контекст.»; « Кроме того, важно помнить, что экспертиза в сфере климатологии теснейшим образом затрагивает интересы транснациональных компаний. Поэтому, вероятно, как политические решения, так и «научные» заключения в сфере климатологии в существенной мере лоббируются с учетом этих интересов. Все эти обстоятельства заставляют усомниться в научной достоверности того знания, которое производит экспертное сообщество климатологов.» — нет (прим. ред.), «Огромная заслуга в демонстрации «близорукости» кейнсианства и его просчетов принадлежит австрийской экономической школе.» — авторка рецензии выступает на стороне одной из школ (прим. ред.), «В силу этого для меня открытым остался вопрос, были ли три рассмотренных кейса историями о «власти научного знания» или все-таки об отношениях между властью и знанием, всего лишь претендующим на научность. Тем не менее в контексте современной социально-эпистемологической проблематики вопрос остается одним из центральных. В этом плане книга ценна не только ярким фактологическим содержанием, но и расширением горизонта проблемного поля социальной эпистемологии.»

[ADDITIONAL_READING] Нико Штер — Информация, власть и знание

Peter Weingart, Nico Stehr (edited by) — Practising Interdisciplinarity

Nico Stehr, Reiner Grundmann — Experts: The Knowledge and Power of Expertise

[NO_SCEDRECO]
-->
1. Грундманн Райнер, Штер Нико — Власть научного знания (Алетейя, 2015).djvu

<a id="Интеллектуалы-консультанты-в-правительстве"></a>
### Интеллектуалы-консультанты в правительстве

<a id="Коммуникация-науки-и-власти"></a>
### Коммуникация науки и власти

<a id="Научно-экспертная-поддержка-власти-в-России-и-мире"></a>
#### Научно-экспертная поддержка власти в России и мире

<!--- [ACADEMIC_DEGREE] Якунин — доктор политологических наук — https://polit.msu.ru/teachers/yakunin/ ; Сулакшин — доктор физико-математических наук — https://neftegaz.ru/persons/332742-sulakshin-stepan/ ; Вилисов — кандидат политических наук — https://polit.msu.ru/teachers/vilisov/ ;
Соколов — научный сотрудник — https://www.isras.ru/pers_about.html?id=1899

[AUTHOR_PROJECT] Центр Сулакшина (Центр научной политической мысли и идеологии) — https://rusrand.ru/

[CRIM_CORRUPTION] Якунин — фигурант коррупционного скандала — https://navalny.com/t/130/

[NOTE] Таблица B.4 — IQ Джорджа Буша = 46, [по Дину Саймонтону этот показатель равен 119](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/U.S._presidential_IQ_hoax#IQ_estimations_by_academics)

[NO_SCEDRECO]

Якунин Владимир Иванович, Сулакшин Степан Степанович, Вилисов Максим Владимирович, Соколов Дмитрий Васильевич — Наука и власть. Проблема коммуникаций (Научный эксперт, 2009)
-->
1. Якунин Владимир Иванович и другие — Наука и власть. Проблема коммуникаций (Научный эксперт, 2009).pdf

<a id="Манипуляции-политиков-с-научными-фактами"></a>
### Манипуляции политиков с научными фактами

<!--- [JOURNALISM_SCIENCE_DEGREE] [Personal site](https://www.davelevitan.com/) — «I have an undergraduate degree from Haverford College, and a Masters degree in journalism from NYU's Science, Health and Environmental Reporting Program»; [some media that published his articles](https://www.davelevitan.com/full-publication-list) — Washington Post, Forbes, New Scientist, Scientific American, LiveScience, Climate Liability News, Factcheck.org, The Atlantic, Wired, The Guardian.

[POSITIVE_OR_NEUTRAL_REVIEW] Zachary Kizer, [Journal of Science Communication](https://jcom.sissa.it/archive/17/01/JCOM_1701_2018_R04) — «Levitan’s book is a thorough and well-researched guidebook for debunking anti-scientific rhetoric.», «Though this book is both of high quality and social importance, there are two issues that readers may see as omissions. First, in his counterattacks on politically charged pseudoscience, Levitan makes no reference to Creationism, a pseudoscience whose proponents often employ techniques very similar to those listed in this book.», «Second, Levitan focuses almost exclusively on Republican and conservative politicians, with only casual references to the unscientific ideas promoted by Democratic and liberal pundits. While there is considerable evidence that right-wingers in general make more noise in terms of anti-science rhetoric that is no reason to ignore the potential intellectual faux pas of the Left.», «While Republicans clearly hold the majority in both instances, that still leaves a significant proportion of Democrats who reject science in the exact same manner. In his introduction, Levitan [2017] claims that his focus on conservative anti-science is not a “partisan statement,” which makes the lack of focus on its liberal counterpart even more puzzling [p. 7].», «Overall, however, Levitan’s Not a Scientist is a potent wake-up call on the lackluster state of American science education and serves as an excellent how-to guide to scholars for debunking rhetoric that butchers science for the sake of political expediency.»

Rachael Beaton, Observatories of the Carnegie Institution for Science, [Nature Astronomy](https://www.nature.com/articles/s41550-017-0124) — «In contrast to the pseudoscientific views covered by Sagan that could be considered fringe topics, Levitan's subjects are the very debates that are currently shaping not only the United States, but also the world at large. The reader does not have to use their imagination to see how they could insert the information, well organized by Levitan, into a conversation the next day.»

Robert L. Stevenson, Ph.D., Editor Emeritus, [American Laboratory](https://americanlaboratory.com/Specialty/Environmental/Blog/337121-Book-Review-Not-a-Scientist/) — «I recommend this book as good reading for anyone interested in science.»

[N/JSc]

[NO_PDF][NO_SCEDRECO] -->
1. Levitan Dave — Not a Scientist꞉ How Politicians Mistake, Misrepresent, and Utterly Mangle Science (W. W. Norton & Company, 2017).epub

<a id="Научная-организация-управленческого-труда-российских-органов-власти"></a>
### Научная организация управленческого труда российских органов власти

<!--- [ACADEMIC_DEGREE] [ОмГУ](http://www.omlaw.ru/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=96:kazannik-aleksej-ivanovich&Itemid=116) — «Докторская диссертация «Региональные проблемы правовой охраны природы в СССР» по специальности «Сельскохозяйственное право; земельное, водное, лесное и горное право; экологическое право» защищена в 1991 году в диссертационном совете при Институте государства и права АН СССР.»

[ACADEMIC_DEGREE_REVIEWERS] Соловей Юрий Петрович — [СибЮУ](https://siblu.ru/univer/employees/solovey-yuriy-petrovich) — доктор юридических наук

Юсупов Виталий Андреевич — [ВолГУ](http://lib.volsu.ru/veduschie-uchenyie-VolGU/book/txt/Yusupov.pdf) — доктор юридических наук

Симухин Виктор Дмитриевич — [РГБ](https://search.rsl.ru/ru/record/01008562591) — кандидат юридических наук

[ACADEMIC_DEGREE_EDITOR] Ответственный редактор Костюков Александр Николаевич — [ОмГУ](https://enforcement.omsu.ru/jour/pages/view/chiefeditor) — доктор юридических наук

[CRIM_IDEOLOGY] Антикоммунистические заявления автора: «Но, чтобы и капитал приобрести, и идеологическую девственность соблюсти, В. И, Ленин в своей работе «Очередные задачи Советской власти» писал»; «Для преодоления «утончённого зверства буржуазной эксплуатации» в системе научной организации труда Ф. У. Тейлора большевики изобрели весьма оригинальный способ. Они создали сеть концлагерей и ввели принудительный труд. Оправдывая социалистическую систему выжимания из человека пота»

[POSITIVE_OR_NEUTRAL_REVIEW][REVIEW_HIGH_POSITIVE] Калужский М. Л., [Вестник Омского отделения Академии гуманитарных наук](https://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/bitstream/handle/document/43112/ssoar-omskotdel-2005-7-rez-kaluzhsky.pdf) — «представляет полно-масштабное междисциплинарное исследование научной организации управленческого труда. Данная работа стала итогом более чем четвертьвекового изучения автором проблем научной организации труда в органах государственного и муниципального управления.», «Абсолютно без преувеличения можно сказать, что автору удалось найти оптимальное сочетание между теорией НОУТ и современной управленческой практикой.», «Написанная живым и понятным языком монография основана на богатейшем практическом опыте работы А.И. Казанника в качестве заместителя Губернатора Омской обла-сти и Генерального прокурора Российской Федерации, а также обобщает многолетний личный опыт чтения лекций по НОУТ в различных вузах Сибири»

[REVIEW_ONE_PAGE] А. В. Четвернина, [Социальные и гуманитарные науки. Отечественная и зарубежная литература](https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/2016-02-022-kazannik-a-i-nauchnaya-organizatsiya-upravlencheskogo-truda-v-ispolnitelnyh-organah-gosudarstvennoy-i-munitsipalnoy-vlasti/pdf) — «В работе рассматривается весь комплекс вопросов, связанных системой организации управленческого труда в исполнительных органах государственной и муниципальной власти России.»

[TYPE] Научно-практическое пособие

[NOTE_FULL_NAME] Казанник Алексей Иванович — Научная организация управленческого труда в исполнительных органах государственной и муниципальной власти России (Проспект, 2015)

[NO_OCR] -->
1. Казанник Алексей Иванович — Научная организация управленческого труда (Проспект, 2015).djvu

<a id="Сомнительная-польза-околовластных-интеллектуалов"></a>
### Сомнительная польза околовластных интеллектуалов

<a id="Несостоятельность-американских-оборонных-интеллектуалов-в-годы-холодной-войны"></a>
#### Несостоятельность американских оборонных интеллектуалов в годы холодной войны

<!--- [ACADEMIC_DEGREE] Bruce Kuklick, Department of History. University of Pennsylvania, Ph.D., American Civilization, Dissertation: "American Foreign Economic Policy and Germany, 1939-46" — https://view.officeapps.live.com/op/embed.aspx?src=https%3A%2F%2Flive-sas-www-history.pantheon.sas.upenn.edu%2Fsites%2Fdefault%2Ffiles%2F2021-01%2FKUKLICK_Bruce_C.V.%25202021.doc

[POSITIVE_OR_NEUTRAL_REVIEW] Frank Ninkovich, St. John’s University — https://zero.sci-hub.se/974/635870d803331f69bfee4403a2e99eff/ninkovich2008.pdf#page=29 — «There is indeed much to contest in this book, although limitations of space preclude such discussion here. What is incontestable, however, is that this brief butrich study offers more insights per page than just about any other work on theCold War of which this reader knows.»

[REVIEW_ONE_PAGE][REVIEW_RETELLING] Robert A. Strong, Washington and Lee University — https://sci-hub.se/10.2307/4486539

David Greenberg, Rutgers University — https://sci-hub.se/10.1002/j.1538-165X.2007.tb01600.x — «One can argue with particularassessments—I think Kuklick overrates Dwight Eisenhower’s intellect, over-states Kissinger’s influence on Richard Nixon, and undervalues the ideas ofthe realist Hans Morgenthau—but his discussions of matters from the etiologyof important concepts like containment and deterrence to the troubled rela-tionship of the university to the ‘‘national security state’’ make the book a dis-tinctive addition to the literature on Cold War thought.»

[BOOK_OR_AUTHOR_OR_CONCEPT_CRITICISM] Richard C. Thornton, George Washington University — https://sci-hub.se/https://www.jstor.org/stable/40109938 — «Ironically, Kuklick saw Kissinger 'put his "theory" into practice, most effectively from 1969 to 1972' (p. 226), when, in fact, the man responsible for the conduct of US strategy and foreign policy during those years was President Richard M. Nixon himself. It was during the 1973-5 period, after Nixon had been dislodged by the Watergate scandal, that Kissinger put his own 'theory' into practice, with the results of detente», « The main shortcoming of Kuklick's book is the absence of the strategic and political contexts within which these men operated. Most specifically, Kuklick fails to see the obvious factional nature of US leadership politics, which, when overlaid upon his serial analyses, illuminates and gives point to what otherwise appears to be pointless argument over arcane and even insignificant matters. The first point is that the debate over US post-war strategy began during the Second World War, not after it, with the central question revolving around the nature of US relations with the Soviet Union.», «Thus, not only does Kuklick fail to begin at the beginning, but he also fails to relate the men and their arguments to the strategic options. Nixon and Kissinger, in the most obvious example, favoured opposite strategies, the president seeking to reinforce containment and his national security adviser espousing detente.», «tainment. Of course, the utter failure of detente prompted Kissinger and his scholarly and political allies to hastily cover up this immense failure of strategic judgement, an effort that has persisted into the present. Indeed, Kissinger himself has led this effort. Unfortunately, Kuklick obscures rather than sheds light on the 'political reality' he has undertaken to study»

[NOTE_FULL_NAME] Kuklick Bruce — Blind Oracles. Intellectuals and War from Kennan to Kissinger (PUP, 2007)

[NO_SCEDRECO] -->
1. Kuklick Bruce — Blind Oracles (PUP, 2007).pdf

<a id="Фабрики-мысли"></a>
### Фабрики мысли

<a id="Фабрики-мысли-США-середины-XX-века"></a>
#### Фабрики мысли США середины XX века

<!--- [JOURNALISM_DEGREE] Работал в «The New York Times», «The New York Herald Tribune», «The Saturday Review of Literature», «Electronics», «EYE», «Smithsonian», «Esquire», «The Nation», «Town & Country», «The Los Angeles Times» и «The Washington Post» — http://www.pauldicksonbooks.com/bio.htm . Не научный журналист, писал о бейсболе.

[POSITIVE_OR_NEUTRAL_REVIEW][REVIEW_RETELLING] Gorr Louis F., historian in the Smithsonian Institution's National Museum of History and Technology — https://sci-hub.se/10.2307/3102356 — «While he tends to be biased against his subject, he nonetheless explores it thoroughly.»

[BOOK_SERIES] Philosophy
-->
1. Диксон Пол — Фабрики мысли (АСТ, 2004).djvu

<a id="Повседневность-политиков"></a>
## Повседневность политиков

<a id="Повседневная-работа-британского-парламента"></a>
### Повседневная работа британского парламента

<!--- [ACADEMIC_DEGREE] Согласно ICGN, PhD in Philosophy — https://www.icgn.org/speakers/dr-oonagh-mcdonald-cbe-international-regulatory-consultant

[PROFESSIONAL_DEGREE] «She was a Member of Parliament for Thurrock in Essex (1976-87)» — https://web.archive.org/web/20201129195735/https://www.oonaghmcdonald.com/about.html

[CRIM_SPEAKER][CRIM_CONSULTING] https://www.icgn.org/speakers/dr-oonagh-mcdonald-cbe-international-regulatory-consultant

[BOOK_SERIES] Живая история. Повседневная жизнь человечества

[NO_SCEDRECO][NO_SOURCES][NO_REVIEW] -->
1. Макдональд Уна — Повседневная жизнь британского парламента (Молодая гвардия, 2007).pdf

<a id="Политическая-наука-конца-XX-века"></a>
## Политическая наука конца XX века

<!--- [INFO] Учёные как авторы, так и редакторы с рецензентами

[NO_PDF] -->
1. [Гудин Роберт](https://scholar.google.ru/citations?user=K8tRbIsAAAAJ), [Клингеманн Ханс-Дитер](https://www.wzb.eu/en/persons/hans-dieter-klingemann) — [Политическая наука. Новые направления](http://pavroz.ru/files/polnauknovnaprav.pdf) (Вече, 1999).doc

<a id="Политическая-психология"></a>
## Политическая психология

<a id="Учебники-политической-психологии"></a>
### Учебники политической психологии

<!--- [ACADEMIC_DEGREE] Доктор политологических и кандидат психологических наук — https://psyfactor.org/autors/olshansky.htm

[CRIM_RAEN] Академик Международной академии информатизации — https://psyfactor.org/autors/olshansky.htm . О МАИ — https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%9C%D0%B5%D0%B6%D0%B4%D1%83%D0%BD%D0%B0%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B4%D0%BD%D0%B0%D1%8F_%D0%B0%D0%BA%D0%B0%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BC%D0%B8%D1%8F_%D0%B8%D0%BD%D1%84%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%BC%D0%B0%D1%82%D0%B8%D0%B7%D0%B0%D1%86%D0%B8%D0%B8#%D0%9A%D1%80%D0%B8%D1%82%D0%B8%D0%BA%D0%B0_%D0%B4%D0%B5%D1%8F%D1%82%D0%B5%D0%BB%D1%8C%D0%BD%D0%BE%D1%81%D1%82%D0%B8

[TYPE_TEXTBOOK_FOR_UNIVERSITIES]

[BOOK_SERIES] Gaudeamus

[NO_SCEDRECO][NO_REVIEW] -->
1. Ольшанский Дмитрий Вадимович — Основы политической психологии (Академический проект, 2020).pdf

<a id="Политическая-философия"></a>
## Политическая философия

<a id="Основные-школы-политической-мысли"></a>
### Основные школы политической мысли

<!--- [ACADEMIC_DEGREE] заведующая кафедрой Кафедра политической теории; научный руководитель образовательных программ, старший научный сотрудник Кафедра регионального управления и национальной политики; Кандидат исторических наук, доктор философских наук. Член Ученых советов по политологии и социологии МГИМО, МГУ и Института философии РАН. — https://mgimo.ru/people/alekseeva/

[ACADEMIC_DEGREE_EDITORS] Марина Михайловна Лебедева — «Профессор, доктор политических наук, кандидат психологических наук» — https://mgimo.ru/people/lebedeva-mm/ ; Мария Михайловна Фёдорова — «Кандидат философских (1983 г.) и доктор политических наук (2005 г.). С 2005 г. возглавляет сектор истории политической философии.» — https://iphras.ru/page17274613.htm

[POSITIVE_OR_NEUTRAL_REVIEW][REVIEW_LONG] Спиридонова Валерия Игоревна, Владимир николаевич Шевченко — институт философии РАН — http://vphil.ru/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=1387 — «Книги Т.А. Алексеевой пользуются повышенным вниманием, в них каждый раз весьма удачно соединяются исследовательское и преподавательское начала. Глубокое знание огромного количества источников вместе с простотой и доступностью изложения делают тексты книг привлекательными для чтения.», «Несомненной удачей автора можно назвать анализ взглядов Лео Штрауса, крупнейшего американского политического мыслителя XX в. Обращает на себя внимание четкое изложение того вызова, который Л. Штраус бросил американской университетской науке.», «В разделе «Идеология как ‟политическое воображаемое”» Т.А. Алексеевой удалось высказать, пожалуй, всё самое важное, относящееся к проблеме идеологии. Автор подчеркивает, что единого, в смысле общепринятого, определения идеологии не существует, причем многие из них противоречат друг другу.», «Несомненным плюсом автора данного учебного пособия является логически ясное и максимально простое изложение очень сложных вопросов.», «При этом нужно заметить, что, несмотря на определенную занимательность изложения, автору удается указать на все главные повороты обсуждаемого сюжета.», «В целом следует сказать, что Т.А. Алексеева, принимаясь за решение достаточно сложного вопроса – изложить доступно и одновременно максимально полно относительно новый дискурс современности – политическую теорию в связи со становлением теории международных отношений, успешно справилась с поставленной задачей. Автору удалось создать четкое и объемное представление о развитии политической теории в целом, которая к концу XX в. распространила свое методологическое влияние на такую специфическую и прагматическую область, какой всегда были международные отношения. Вместе с тем автор этого нового, не только учебного, но и без сомнения, значимого научного труда сумел наглядно показать и доказать, что интеграция политической теории и теории международных отношений в единую дисциплину стала научным фактом, и потому новая книга Т.А. Алексеевой несомненно станет значимым событием в отечественной политической мысли.»

[DUPLICATE_GI]

[TYPE_TEXTBOOK_FOR_UNIVERSITIES]
-->
1. Алексеева Татьяна Александровна — Современная политическая мысль (XX—XXI вв.). Политическая теория и международные отношения (Аспект Пресс, 2018).pdf
<!--- [ACADEMIC_DEGREE] D.Phil. (Oxford)

[BOOK_SCEDRECO][CRIM_SCIENCE_EDITOR] Научный редактор — кандидат философских наук Артём Александрович Смирнов — http://logosjournal.ru/static/artem-smirnov.html и Марина Самуиловна Ковалёва, об учёных званиях которой я ничего не нашёл — https://i.imgur.com/RjgZXNV.png . Возможно, этого недостаточно для высшей категории.

[BOOK_CRITICISM] https://sci-hub.se/10.1086/293609 , https://sci-hub.se/10.2478/s13374-011-0015-7 , http://libertarianpapers.org/wp-content/uploads/article/2012/lp-4-2-2.pdf — в последнем примере критика серьёзная, однако её, по моему мнению, недостаточно для категории «Ad»

[BOOK_SERIES] Политическая теория
 -->
1. [Кимлика Уилл](https://www.queensu.ca/politics/people/faculty/will-kymlicka) — Современная политическая философия (Высшая Школа Экономики, 2010).djvu

<a id="Политическое-прогнозирование"></a>
## Политическое прогнозирование

<a id="Меньшая-никудышность-политических-прогнозов-«лис»-в-сравнении-с-«ежами»"></a>
### Меньшая никудышность политических прогнозов «лис» в сравнении с «ежами»

<!--- [ACADEMIC_DEGREE] Ph.D. Yale University, Psychology — https://faculty.wharton.upenn.edu/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/Tetlock-CV_Jan-31-2015.pdf , https://mgmt.wharton.upenn.edu/profile/tetlock/

[AUTHOR_PROJECT] Good Judgement — https://goodjudgment.com/

[Автор](https://mgmt.wharton.upenn.edu/profile/tetlock/)

[POSITIVE_OR_NEUTRAL_REVIEW] Paul Sniderman, Stanford University — https://sci-hub.se/https://www.jstor.org/stable/20447036 — «I know of no book in political science in the last decade and more that approaches it in importance.»

Adrian E. Tschoegl, Lecturer in Management; J. Scott Armstrong, Professor of Marketing, The University of Pennsylvania — https://repository.upenn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1056&context=marketing_papers

[REVIEW_RETELLING] Carlos González Villa, Universidad de Rijeka — https://dialnet.unirioja.es/descarga/articulo/5889887.pdf

[REVIEW_RETELLING] Gerald F. Gaus, University of Arizona — https://sci-hub.se/10.1017/S1537592707070272

[ADDITIONAL_READING] Стив Фуллер — Постправда: Знание как борьба за власть

[NO_SCEDRECO] 

[NOTE_FULL_NAME] «Tetlock Philip Eyrikson — Expert Political Judgment. How Good Is It. How Can We Know (Princeton University Press, 2017)»

[NO_PDF] На LibGen имеется PDF-файл издания 2006 года; издание 2017 нашёл лишь в формате EPUB
-->
1. Tetlock Philip Eyrikson — Expert Political Judgment (Princeton University Press, 2017).epub

<a id="Принятие-политических-решений"></a>
## Принятие политических решений

<a id="Принятие-внешнеполитических-решений-в-России"></a>
### Принятие внешнеполитических решений в России

<!--- [ACADEMIC_DEGREE] Демидов — доктор исторических наук, профессор, заведующий кафедрой международных отношений и гуманитарного сотрудничества — https://site-siu.ranepa.ru/pimo/?id=446 ; Дудин, возможно, кандидат исторических наук — https://www.dissercat.com/content/energeticheskaya-politika-v-usloviyakh-transformatsii-rossiiskogo-obshchestva

[ACADEMIC_DEGREE_REVIEWERS] Игорь Николаевич Гомеров, кандидат политических наук, профессор — https://mk.nso.ru/news/3402 ; Нуриддинов Раймалихон Шабозович — доктор политических наук, профессор — http://sibir-eurasia.ru/publications/natsionalnyie-intieriesy-riespubliki-tadzhikistan-v-ramkakh-sodruzhiestva-niezavisimykh-gosudarstv

[NOTE] На Дудина нашёл лишь диссертацию

[INFO] Как минимум один из авторов — учёный, пишущий по своей теме + учёные-рецензенты → категория Kr

[CRIM_SINGLE_CONFIRMATION][CRIM_ANECDOTAL_EVIDENCES] Всерьёз рассказываются полуанекдотические истории, пример: «В качестве примера, он привел забавную историю. Один американский изобретатель якобы придумал аппарат по устранению силы тяжести. Пентагон заинтересовался и дал на разработку один миллион долларов. Наши военные собрали, в свою очередь, академиков и потребовали опередить конкурента. Через год американец сбежал с секретаршей и миллионом.» Ссылки в книге по большей части на анекдотические свидетельства.

[BOOK_SERIES] Политическая библиотека менеджера

[NO_REVIEW]
-->
1. [Демидов Валерий Викторович](https://site-siu.ranepa.ru/pimo/?id=446), [Дудин Владимир Владимирович](https://www.dissercat.com/content/energeticheskaya-politika-v-usloviyakh-transformatsii-rossiiskogo-obshchestva) — Процесс принятия политических решений. Учебное пособие (САУМК, 2008).pdf

<a id="Сравнительная-политология"></a>
## Сравнительная политология

<a id="Учебники-сравнительной-политологии"></a>
### Учебники сравнительной политологии

<!--- [INFO] В АИ так и пишется «Дж. Бинем Пауэлл» без указания имени.

[INFO] Издание имеет научных редакторов

[DUPLICATE_GI]

[NO_OCR] -->
1. [Алмонд Габриэль Абрахам](https://www.britannica.com/biography/Gabriel-Almond), [Бинем Пауэлл Дж.](https://www.sas.rochester.edu/psc/people/view.php?fid=4), [Стром Кааре](https://polisci.ucsd.edu/people/faculty/faculty-directory/currently-active-faculty/strom-profile.html), [Далтон Рассел](https://www.socsci.uci.edu/~rdalton/) — Сравнительная политология сегодня. Мировой обзор (Аспект Пресс, 2002).pdf

<a id="Теории-политики"></a>
## Теории политики

<a id="Эмпирические-политические-теории"></a>
### Эмпирические политические теории

<!--- [ACADEMIC_DEGREE] Profesor–senior w Uniwersytecie Jagiellońskim — https://politologia.uni.wroc.pl/attachments/Laska_rec1_2019-04-23_11-21-14.pdf

[ACADEMIC_DEGREE_EDITOR] Доктор психологических наук Ольга Сергеевна Дейнека — https://psy.spbu.ru/department/teachers/456-deyneka-os

[POSITIVE_OR_NEUTRAL_REVIEW][REVIEW_RETELLING] Sylwester Wróbel, Uniwersytet Śląski w Katowicach ( https://us.edu.pl/instytut/inp/wrobel-sylwester/ ) — https://rebus.us.edu.pl/bitstream/20.500.12128/18389/1/Wrobel_Barbara_Krauz-Mozer.pdf — «Książka Barbary Krauz-Mozer to wartościowe, wnikliwe, rzetelne, inspirujące do dalszych dyskusji i badań studium stanu teorii w nauce o polityce, godne polecenia tym, których interesują procesy poznawcze w tej dyscyplinie.»

[ADDITIONAL_READING] Dominique Pestre — Introduction aux Science Studies

Paul Cairney — The Politics of Evidence-Based Policy Making
-->
1. [Крауз-Мозер Барбара](https://ruj.uj.edu.pl/xmlui/bitstream/handle/item/72933/palecki_barbara_krauz-mozer_czyli_metodolog_badacz_dydaktyk_2014.pdf) — Теории политики. Методологические принципы (Гуманитарный центр, 2008).djvu

<a id="Учебники-по-политологии"></a>
## Учебники по политологии

<!--- [DUPLICATE_GI]

[INFO] Рецензент — Татьяна Владимировна Шмачкова, кандидат исторических наук, основное направление деятельности — политические процессы и институты — http://eurasian-defence.ru/?q=node/9255 -->
1. [Мельвиль Андрей Юрьевич](https://mgimo.ru/people/1907/) (руководитель авторского коллектива) — Политология (МГИМО, МИД России, ТК Велби, Проспект, 2008).pdf
<!--- [DUPLICATE_GI]

[INFO] Судя по биографии на собственном сайте, Хейвуд не имеет учёных званий в области политологии — https://andrewheywood.jimdofree.com/ . Однако редакторы — академик российской академии политических наук Григорий Григорьевич Водолазов — https://www.rsuh.ru/who_is_who/detail.php?ID=4454 http://www.journ.msu.ru/about/departments/kafedra-istorii-russkoy-literatury-i-zhurnalistiki/vypuskniki.php и доктор философских наук Виталий Юрьевич Бельский — https://istina.msu.ru/workers/8551055/ . По Водолазову учебнику можно выставить категорию «авторитетные рецензенты». -->
1. Хэйвуд Эндрю — Политология (Юнити-Дана, 2005).pdf

<a id="Потребление"></a>
# Потребление

<a id="Ильин-Алексей-Николаевич"></a>
## Ильин Алексей Николаевич

<!--- [INFO] В своих книгах Ильин приводит свои многочисленные публикации в ВАКовских журналах на тему консьюмеризма

[Автор](https://omgpu.ru/person/ilin_an)

[INFO] 6 докторов наук в рецензентах.

[INFO] Работа выполнена при финансовой поддержке Минобрнауки России (государственное задание) -->
1. Ильин Алексей Николаевич — Культура общества массового потребления. Критическое осмысление (ОмГПУ, 2014).pdf
<!--- [INFO] Имеются научные редактор и рецензенты -->
1. Ильин Алексей Николаевич — Культура, стремящаяся в никуда. Критический анализ потребительских тенденций (ОмГПУ, 2012).djvu
<!--- [INFO] В рецензентах доктора филологических, философских и исторических наук

[INFO] Работа выполнена при финансовой поддержке Минобрнауки России (государственное задание)

[ADDITIONAL_READING] Бауман Зигмунд, Донскис Леонидас — «Моральная слепота: Утрата чувствительности в эпоху текучей современности»

Бауман Зигмунд, Донскис Леонидас — «Текучее зло: Жизнь в мире, где нет альтернатив»

Naish, John — «Enough»

Cordula Tutt — «Das große Schrumpfen»
-->
1. Ильин Алексей Николаевич — Наше потребительское настоящее (ОмГПУ, 2016).pdf
<!--- [INFO] Научный редактор и рецензенты — доктора философских наук -->
1. Ильин Алексей Николаевич — Субъект в массовой культуре современного общества потребления (на материале китч-культуры) (Амфора, 2010).pdf

<a id="Макдональдизация"></a>
## Макдональдизация

<!--- [ACADEMIC_DEGREE] PhD sociology — https://socy.umd.edu/facultyprofile/ritzer/george

[BOOK_SCEDRECO] Общая редакция кандидата философских наук Тимофея Александровича Дмитриева — https://www.hse.ru/org/persons/509134

[POSITIVE_OR_NEUTRAL_REVIEW] https://sci-hub.se/10.1080/00045600802708663 , https://pages.gseis.ucla.edu/faculty/kellner/essays/theorizingresistingmcdonaldization.pdf , https://userpage.fu-berlin.de/~gerhards/lehrangebot_ss06/konvergenz_br%FCsemeister.pdf , https://sci-hub.se/https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-531-90017-9_21 . Не нашёл резкой критики, но нашёл множество научных работ с термином «Макдональдизация» — https://scholar.google.com/scholar?start=0&q=McDonaldization+Ritzer+criticism

[BOOK_SUPPORT] ВЦИОМ

[NO_OPINION_JOURNALISM]

[BOOK_SERIES] Образ общества

[NO_OCR] -->
1. [Ритцер Джордж](https://socy.umd.edu/facultyprofile/ritzer/george) — Макдональдизация общества 5 (Праксис, 2011).djvu

<a id="Предрассудки-и-социальный-контроль"></a>
# Предрассудки и социальный контроль

<a id="Межгрупповой-контакт"></a>
## Межгрупповой контакт

<!--- [Kr/MCol][Ti/Mcol]

[ACADEMIC_DEGREE_EDITORS] Vezzali, [University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, CV](https://personale.unimore.it/Curriculum.aspx?id=375&nome=Loris_VEZZALI&lingua=it) — «Loris Vezzali is Full Professor of Social Psychology at the Surgical, Medical and Dental Department of Morphological Sciences related to Transplant, Oncology and Regenerative Medicine, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia. He has been Assistant and then Associate Professor at the same university since 2011, after graduating at the University of Padova and obtaining his PhD in Social Psychology from the same University with a doctoral thesis on prejudice reduction (for which he won the award for the best thesis in Social psychology awarded by the Section of Social Psychology of the Italian Association of Psychology in 2008).»

Stathi, [University of Greenwich](https://www.gre.ac.uk/people/rep/faculty-of-education-and-health/sofia-stathi) — «Sofia obtained a BSc Psychology from the University of Crete, Greece and then a PhD from the University of Birmingham, UK. She joined the University of Greenwich as Senior Lecturer in 2011. Prior to this, Sofia was a post-doctoral researcher and then Lecturer at the University of Kent.», «Sofia is a social psychologist, exploring primarily processes that relate to intergroup relations. Sofia's research focuses on prejudice and prejudice-reduction among majority and minority groups via direct and indirect intergroup contact. Furthermore, Sofia's research examines social categorisation and social identity; multiculturalism and acculturation processes; collective action; social exclusion.»

[ACADEMIC_DEGREE] Siwar Hasan-Aslih, [Psychology of Intergroup Conflict & Reconciliation Lab (PICR), CV](https://www.eranhalperin.com/siwar-aslih) ([direct CV link](https://0bf0e08a-5ede-4520-aed8-9fb4e2063653.filesusr.com/ugd/75b8a6_973a3a6c48f34a72a944ed7301da2f34.pdf)) — «2014 — Ph.D. Social Psychology, University of Groningen, Netherlands»

Danit Sobol-Sarag, [ORCID](https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8831-4677) — «2015-10 to 2018-02 | M.A in Social Psychology (Psychology)»

Все кроме Danit Sobol-Sarag имеют PhD и/или учёное звание профессора

[REVIEW_CHECK] 2021-9-6

[POSITIVE_OR_NEUTRAL_REVIEW][REVIEW_LONG] Ashley Lytle, Stevens Institute of Technology, [Social Justice Research](https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Ashley-Lytle-2/publication/327094361_Intergroup_Contact_Theory_Recent_Developments_and_Future_Directions/links/5babb2d845851574f7e95825/Intergroup-Contact-Theory-Recent-Developments-and-Future-Directions.pdf) — «For scholars of intergroup contact theory, individuals passionate about social justice, and policy makers interested in applying this research to real-world contexts, this book is an essential read.», «Expanding on the material provided in the chapter, another direction for future research, could examine how online intergroup contact (or the lack of it) may influence attitudes and behaviors among those both high and low in prejudice.», «Expanding on the suggestions provided in this chapter, self-affirmation may provide a way to undo some of the ironic effects of intergroup contact.», «Expanding on Graf and Paolini’s call for more research on contact valence, one possible way to causally measure the subjective nature of contact appraisal would be to utilize technology such as virtual reality (VR).», «Another promising line of research not mentioned in this chapter, could examine how imagined contact impacts outcomes among minority (disadvantaged) individuals.», «Another line of research could continue to examine what individual and situational contexts encourage cross-group friendships.», «As a whole, Intergroup Contact Theory provides an extensive overview of a longstanding and rich field of research on arguably the most influential theory of prejudice reduction in social psychology.», «Vezzali and Stathi’s Intergroup Contact Theory is the most comprehensive and forward thinking analysis of intergroup contact theory to date. This text can be used to inform academics, public policy makers, educators, and more on how to continue the promising work of intergroup contact theory while still remaining cognizant of its potential drawbacks.»
-->
1. Vezzali Loris, Stathi Sofia (editors) — Intergroup Contact Theory꞉ Recent Developments and Future Directions (Routledge, 2017).pdf

<a id="Стереотипы"></a>
## Стереотипы

<a id="Угроза-подтверждения-стереотипа"></a>
### Угроза подтверждения стереотипа

1. [Стил Клод](https://profiles.stanford.edu/claude-steele) — Как стереотипы заставляют мозг тупеть. И что с этим делать (АСТ, 2010).epub

<a id="Стигма"></a>
## Стигма

<!--- [Is/Mono]

[ACADEMIC_DEGREE] Brewis, [Arizona State University, CV](https://isearch.asu.edu/profile/855688/cv) — «1992 — Ph.D. in Anthropology, University of Arizona. Biological Anthropology major, Medical Anthropology minor.», «I study how low social position and resource insecurities (essentially low power) interact with disease meanings, experiences, and diagnoses to exacerbate the psychosocial stresses that worsen physical and mental health.»

Wutich, [Arizona State University, CV](https://isearch.asu.edu/profile/951251/cv) — «Doctor of Philosophy, Cultural Anthropology, May 2006. University of Florida, Dissertation: “The Effects of Water Scarcity on Sociability and Reciprocity in Cochabamba, Bolivia”, Chair: Dr. H. Russell Bernard», «Postdoctoral Researcher, Global Institute of Sustainability, Arizona State University, 2006-2007», «Research Interests — Ecological, Economic and Biocultural Anthropology; Water and Food Insecurity; Institutions; Environmental Justice; Global Mental Health; Cross-cultural Research; Latin America; Field Methods»

[NO_ACADEMIC_DEGREE_EDITORS] «We are also very thankful to science writer Laura Sessions, director of The Write Stuff, for her careful and impor tant work in editing the overall text, Alyssa Lindsey for editorial support in preparation of the final submission, and our editor Robin Coleman.»

Laura Sessions Stepp, [Georgetown University, Berkeley Center](https://berkleycenter.georgetown.edu/people/laura-sessions-stepp) — «Laura Sessions Stepp is a freelance writer, former Washington Post reporter, Pulitzer Prize winner, and currently a senior media fellow at the National Campaign to Prevent Teen and Unplanned Pregnancy.»

Alyssa Lindsey, [Arizona State University, Virginia G. Piper Center for Creative Writing](https://piper.asu.edu/students/mentoring/people/alyssa-lindsey) — «Alyssa Lindsey is a senior studying Global Health and Creative Writing. She serves on the editorial board for Normal Noise, Barrett's creative writing journal.»

Robin W. Coleman, [Johns Hopkins University Press, Books Division Staff](https://www.press.jhu.edu/contact/staff) — «Robin W. Coleman, Acquisitions Editor Public Health and Health Policy»

[REVIEW_CHECK] 2021-8-14

[POSITIVE_OR_NEUTRAL_REVIEW] Julie Pulerwitz, HIV and AIDS programme at the Population Council, [Nature](https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-019-03531-2) — «It is this third issue — the unintended consequences of big campaigns — that forms their main argument. And it is a rarely heard and compelling one.», «The book is less strong on ways forward.», «But, in my view, a more comprehensive and nuanced response is needed. There are important distinctions between, for example, public-health measures to reduce people’s internalized feelings of blame and shame, and legislative efforts to minimize ‘enacted’ stigma», «Moreover, Brewis and Wutich fail to explore an important concept: intersecting stigmas. For example, a person with HIV who works in the sex industry and injects drugs might experience compounded bias and discrimination.», «The authors use HIV as an example of a success story in which concentrated efforts from the global health community, such as health policies and mass-media campaigns, have greatly reduced stigma. But this is true only in some communities — especially in high-income countries where living with HIV has been transformed into a chronic illness through the use of anti-retroviral medications. These medications are often not reaching the most vulnerable, and in many contexts — for example, where drug users are criminalized and struggle to access health care — intersecting stigmas remain rampant», «This engaging book nevertheless fills a significant gap in the literature by providing a wake-up call to scholars and practitioners unfamiliar with the topic.»

[REVIEW_RETELLING] María Jesús Vega-Salas, University of Bristol, [Sociology of Health & Illness](https://sci-hub.se/10.1111/1467-9566.13190) — «Brewis and Wutich’s book offers a rigorous analysis of how public global health efforts can create and reinforce stigma.», «One limitation is that there is no explicit analysis on the role of colonialism in these global processes», «Despite this, I enjoyed reading this well-researched book. This book is recommended for anyone with a general interest in global public health, undergraduate and postgraduate students from health-related disciplines including medical sociology. This book should be considered by health practitioners, scholars and public health professionals when designing and implementing health-related interventions.»

Karly Nygaard-Petersen, Royal Roads University, Canada, [Organization](https://sci-hub.se/10.1177/1350508420966746) — «Taken together, the three parts comprising Crazy, Lazy and Disgusting serve to develop a cogent, cohesive and compelling claim.», «However, the authors underestimate the strength of their argument in the conclusion of the book, in which Brewis and Wutich outline a potential way forward and hail optimism in preventing, challenging and reversing stigma», «Their call for optimism appears in the wake of the rich detail, enthralling storytelling and persuasive figures that divulge what an unseen monstrosity that is stigma.», «The potential solutions, which include redeploying some of the same tactics that were part of failed efforts detailed in earlier sections of the book, leave me feeling that despite tools such as increasing practitioner awareness, tracking stigma and improving evidenced-based policy, the issues around stigma remain insurmountable.», «The dangers of stigma outlined by Brewis and Wutich are not limited to health outcomes and the implications they so vividly illustrate hold relevance that extends well beyond global health initiatives», «A satisfyingly simple symmetry in construction belies complex and intricate theory knitted effortlessly into rich ethnographic evidence. This text is both academic and accessible, making it an engrossing read for those interested in medicine and public health, anthropology and sociology. I would argue it is also incredibly relevant to those who experience, resist or perpetuate stigma: each and every one of us»

Emily Mendenhall, Georgetown University, [Medical Anthropology Quarterly](https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Emily-Mendenhall/publication/339338765_Lazy_Crazy_and_Disgusting_Stigma_and_the_Undoing_of_Global_Health_Alexandra_Brewis_and_Amber_Wutich_Baltimore_MD_Johns_Hopkins_University_Press_2019_270_pp_Book_Review/links/606f47504585150fe993a4ee/Lazy-Crazy-and-Disgusting-Stigma-and-the-Undoing-of-Global-Health-Alexandra-Brewis-and-Amber-Wutich-Baltimore-MD-Johns-Hopkins-University-Press-2019-270-pp-Book-Review.pdf) — «Brewis and Wutich expertly deconstruct “the complex, dangerous dance between stigma and public health” (p. 3).», «From tackling Big Tobacco to building latrines and preventing obesity, this book unpacks the hidden moments that produce stigma within policies and programs in public health and medicine that have», «In contrast to recent global health texts focused on the political or structural dimensions that undo health progress, this book’s focus on social undoing will make readers consider new perspectives.», «Lazy, Crazy, and Disgusting is an impeccably researched, collaborative, thought-provoking, and boundarybreaking book that should be required reading for anyone interested in public health, medicine, and anthropology. It stands as an exemplar for public scholarship among two of our most devoted anthropologists who hug the margins of biological, cultural, and medical anthropology.», «Finally, Alexandra Brewis and Amber Wutich provide a powerful example for future anthropologists wishing to make a mark: Publish in a diverse array of journals, coauthor with gusto, promote diverse arrangements of authorship and contributions, and write a book deeply engaged with theory, ethnography, and mixed methods for the public.»

[REVIEW_ONE_PAGE] Fiona Mitchell, [The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology](https://sci-hub.se/10.1016/S2213-8587(20)30127-3) — «Brewis and Wutich provide a very useful primer on stigma, which gives a succinct explanation of what stigma is in relation to global health, its different forms, and how stigmatisation intersects with other populationlevel and individual-level effects. As an important topic for students of medicine, global health, and ethics, Lazy, Crazy, and Disgusting would be a useful recommended text.», «However, Brewis and Wutich don’t offer especially detailed suggestions for what public health interventions targeting obesity might look like if they reduce or avoid stigmatisation.»

[BOOK_OR_AUTHOR_OR_CONCEPT_CRITICISM][REVIEW_IN_SCIENCE_MEDIA] Christopher Hamlin, [American Scientist](https://www.americanscientist.org/article/how-best-to-foster-healthy-behaviors) — «The book provides an accessible, synthetic, and critical examination of the health effects of shame and stigma, one that was already long overdue when the book was published in 2019.», «In highlighting the counterproductive nature of some well-intended approaches, the book makes a legitimate point. But as I will try to show, that point is a limited one.», «Often Brewis and Wutich state their conclusions in strong terms, declaring, for example, that “Shame in all its forms needs to be removed from the public health tool kit, because it too easily misfires.” But then will come a caveat—in this case, “at the very least until the social stigma and longer-term impacts… are adequately tracked and addressed.”», «A book such as this, aimed at the general reader and focused on the harm done by health-shaming, cannot be expected to explore thoroughly the methodological problems involved in measuring that harm.», «The authors ask, “Is sanitation for all worth the painful, damaging humiliation and rejection of some?” The question is not merely rhetorical, and if stigma assessments are to be integrated into health planning, costs and benefits will need to be measured. As matters of social science methodology, the difficulties in performing such evaluations are formidable—they involve arriving at definitions, choosing means of measurement, agreeing on null hypotheses, controlling confounding factors, and so forth.», «Similar difficulties arise in assessing the effects of admonitions in individual lives. I am thinking about null hypotheses when I assess my diet and exercise regimen: Even if I have lost no weight, might I have gained more weight without the regimen?», «One expects truth-telling from a clinician. At my dental checkup, I want the hygienist to chastise me if I am flossing haphazardly. Do I floss more diligently after being chastised? Perhaps. Response to shaming is not an either/or matter. I may respond more positively to one messenger than another, even when the message being delivered is the same.», «For Brewis and Wutich, shaming and other forms of stigmatization reflect the “powerful moral overtones” that pervade public health, and that fact dismays them. But a moral commitment has been and remains central to a field committed to progressive change; their book is itself an example.», «They say surprisingly little about the differing moral situations in the three domains they have chosen to discuss.», «In focusing on what to avoid, they overlook deeper questions of how health-related behaviors and sensibilities are shaped.», «The insights of both of these theorists are more ambiguous and unsettling than Brewis and Wutich acknowledge. They agree with Douglas’s hypothesis that “hygiene stigma” is about maintaining “statuses and boundaries” rather than infection-avoidance, but they stop short of recognizing, as Douglas did, how important those statuses are.», «Brewis and Wutich cite Goffman’s stark descriptions of the routine dehumanization of patients in asylums, but they ignore his exploration of the power roles that can transform an empathetic and stigma-deploring trainee attendant into someone whose professional identity is predicated on the dehumanization that results from the separation of “us” from “them.”», «Brewis and Wutich recognize, but in my view do not sufficiently emphasize, the great extent to which social and economic circumstances determine whether admonitions are demeaning or constructive.»

[REVIEW_NO_ACCESS] Felicia Casanova, [Teaching Sociology](https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0092055X20983320?journalCode=tsoa)

[REVIEW_NO_ACCESS] Samantha Winter, [Affilia](https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/08861099211034022) -->
1. Brewis Slade Alexandra A., Wutich Amber — Lazy, Crazy, and Disgusting꞉ Stigma and the Undoing of Global Health (Johns Hopkins University Press, 2019).pdf

<a id="Профессионализм"></a>
# Профессионализм

<a id="Смерть-экспертизы"></a>
## Смерть экспертизы

<!--- [NO_PDF] -->
1. [Николс Том](https://usnwc.edu/Faculty-and-Departments/Directory/Thomas-M-Nichols) — Смерть экспертизы. Как интернет убивает научные знания (Эксмо, 2019).fb2

<a id="Экспертократия"></a>
## Экспертократия

<!--- [ACADEMIC_DEGREE] Доктор философских наук, кандидат политических наук — https://istina.msu.ru/profile/ASHKEROV/

[ACADEMIC_DEGREE_EDITORS] Момджян Карен Хачикович, доктор философских наук — https://philos.msu.ru/node/106 ; Миронов Владимир Васильевич, доктор философских наук — https://philos.msu.ru/node/105

[BOOK_SERIES] Политучёба

[TYPE_PHIL][NO_REVIEW]
-->
1. [Ашкеров Андрей Юрьевич](https://philos.msu.ru/node/493) — Экспертократия. Управление знаниями. Производство и обращение информации в эпоху ультракапитализма (Европа, 2009).pdf

<a id="Психология"></a>
# Психология

<a id="Бихевиоризм"></a>
## Бихевиоризм

<a id="Общественное-значение-бихевиористской-психологии"></a>
### Общественное значение бихевиористской психологии

<a id="NR-52"></a>
#### NR

<a id="Масштабные-фальсификации-автора"></a>
##### Масштабные фальсификации автора

<!--- [NO_OCR]

[NOTE] О фальсификациях Айзенка см. David F. Marks — [Hans J. Eysenck: la chute d’un charlatan](https://www.sceptiques.qc.ca/assets/docs/Qu%C3%A9bec%20sceptique%20no%20104.pdf#page=49), Le Québec sceptique, Numéro 104, Printemps 2021

[CRIM] Многие работы Айзенка подверглись переоценке. Его исследования, связанные с влиянием курения на рак, [финансировались табачными компаниями](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hans_Eysenck#2019_King's_College_London_enquiry).
 -->
1. [Айзенк Ганс Юрген](http://www.hrono.info/biograf/bio_a/eysenck.php) — Парадоксы психологии (Эксмо, 2009).pdf

<a id="Введение-в-психологию"></a>
## Введение в психологию

<!--- [ACADEMIC_DEGREE] [Personal site](https://psychologywriter.org.uk/bio/) — «With a PhD in cognitive neuroscience, Christian is a chartered psychologist and associate fellow of the British Psychological Society.»

[CRIM_SPEAKER] https://psychologywriter.org.uk/speaking/

[N/WS]

[POSITIVE_OR_NEUTRAL_REVIEW][REVIEW_ONE_PAGE] Gillian Ladley (Freelance Journalist) and Paul Gardner (Principal Teaching Fellow), School of Psychology, University of St Andrews, United Kingdom, [Psychology Learning and Teaching](https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.2304/plat.2012.11.2.289) — «This results in a book that covers a lot of ground, giving broad overviews of all the key areas and issues in psychology, preferring to touch on a wide range of topics and studies rather than providing any in-depth focus or analysis on any specific area.», «Usefully, the Rough Guide itself provides an unapologetic explanation of what to expect from its layout and contents: it aims to bring the reader ‘up to speed’ on recent research rather than to provide either an academic analysis or revision tools for study», «There are no bullet points, overviews or aides-memoire at the beginning or end of each chapter, the references to academic sub-disciplines are of secondary importance, and although key names and scientific terms are used and even highlighted», «The book covers matters in a friendly overview, without falling into a trap of sensationalising science or its implications, and similarly without using a dry or educational tone.», «Perhaps the resources section of this Rough Guide has swayed a little too far in appealing to the lay reader, as it deliberately avoids textbooks in favour of suggesting further exploration of popular books, blogs and movies (and even Psychologies magazine)»

[REVIEW_HIGH_POSITIVE] Uta Frith, Emeritus Professor at the Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, University College London, [The Psychologist](https://thepsychologist.bps.org.uk/volume-24/edition-5/book-reviews) — «He does not shrink from discussing notorious critiques of neuroimaging, or from debates about such controversial topics as ‘nudge’, gender differences, intelligence testing, false memories and false confessions.», «For example, stereotype threat, altruism, persuasion and compliance are all soundly discussed in the context of the groundbreaking experiments that established them as topics of further study. But what is so appealing in this book is that you are given everyday context; for instance, what happens when we are shopping, working with others, doing sports, learning in the classroom.», «This book presents psychology today ‘in a nutshell’, and it is almost frighteningly up to date.», «If I had to help a young person choose the subject they should study I would not make any direct suggestions, but if I was convinced they should take up psychology, I would simply recommend this book.»

[BOOK_SERIES] «Rough Guide Reference»

[NO_SCEDRECO][NO_SOURCES] -->
1. Jarrett Christian — The Rough Guide to Psychology (Rough Guides, 2011).pdf

<a id="История-психологии"></a>
## История психологии

<a id="История-психологии-как-независимой-дисциплины"></a>
### История психологии как независимой дисциплины

<!--- [DUPLICATE_GI]

[INFO] Не нашёл сведений об авторах во вторичных источниках. В оригинальной английской версии книги «Duane P. Schultz — University of South Florida», но на сайте университета Шульц упоминается лишь вскользь. Книга рекомендуется, поскольку её научный редактор — кандидат психологических наук Андрей Дмитриевич Наследов — https://psy.spbu.ru/department/teachers/543-nasledov-ad . -->
1. Шульц Дуан, Шульц Сидни Элен — История современной психологии (Евразия, 2002).pdf

<a id="Ключевые-психологические-понятия"></a>
## Ключевые психологические понятия

<!--- [DUPLICATE_GI]

[NOTE] Один и тот же текст в различных книгах Степанов — не редкость
-->
1. [Степанов Сергей Сергеевич](https://mgppu.ru/people/112/981) — Популярная психологическая энциклопедия (Эксмо, 2005).pdf

<a id="Мифы-популярной-психологии"></a>
## Мифы популярной психологии

<!--- [ACADEMIC_DEGREE] Лилиенфельд — «his Ph.D. in Psychology (Clinical) from the University of Minnesota in 1990» — http://psychology.emory.edu/home/people/faculty/lilienfeld-scott.html ; Линн — «Ph.D., Indiana University, l976. Major: Clinical Psychology. Minor: Sociology» — https://www.binghamton.edu/psychology/docs/cv/slynn.cv.pdf ; Рускио — «PhD in Social/Developmental Psychology (May, 1998) — https://ruscio.pages.tcnj.edu/files/2016/02/John-Ruscio-CV.pdf ; Бейерстайн — «Ph.D., Experimental and Biological Psychology, 1973: University of California, Berkeley» https://web.archive.org/web/20070306022815/http://www.sfu.ca/psyc/faculty/beyerstein/CV.pdf

[FAIL_BIBLIOGRAPHY][BOOK_FILE_WITH_BIBLIOGRAPHY] «Lilienfeld Scott O., Lynn Steven Jay, Ruscio John, Beyerstein Barry L. — 50 great myths of popular psychology꞉ shattering widespread misconceptions about human behavior (Wiley-Blackwell, 2010).pdf»

[POSITIVE_OR_NEUTRAL_REVIEW][REVIEW_RETELLING][REVIEW_ONE_PAGE] Journal of the History of the Behavioral Science — https://sci-hub.se/10.1002/jhbs.21527 — «Such scholars might be inspired to look into the history of some of the popular myths thebook dismisses, and/or to suggest the important legacy in modern psychology of certain“mythological” beliefs, as David Bakan (1966, 1968) did with phrenology. They may alsoquestion some of the authors’ conclusions, for example their dismissal of the issue of test biasagainst “certain groups of people” (p. 83), which claims simply that intelligence tests havepredictive validity without mentioning the question of culture-bound tests. Historians mightalso be interested in asking why certain “myths” have become so popular—for example, why “self-esteem” is currently seen as a “prime culprit in generating many unhealthy behaviors”(p. 162). Historians may find this book an interesting resource, whether they use it to providea “mythbusting kit” or to suggest historical questions regarding popular psychology andscientific psychologists’ responses.»

[REVIEW_ONE_PAGE] Jason Braithwaite, School of Psychology, University of Birmingham — https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.2304/plat.2010.9.2.73 — «The real messages of the book are in promoting the value of applying scientific reasoning to everyday problems, and that things are not necessarily true, just because someone says so.», «The introduction sets the scene well by discussing the processes of how urban myths/pseudoscience and many aspects of popular psychology come into being, and also how scientific reasoning should be applied to these issues. Each topic is discussed with sufficient brevity to keep even the most wandering of minds engaged. Indeed, my only real criticism would be that some topics could have been fleshed out a little more – but I guess that is not in the scope of a book like this.», «It should be equally digestible to the A-level student and the first-year undergraduate. What it lacks in in-depth discussion, it more than makes up for in terms of an engaging scope.»

[REVIEW_RETELLING] Dr. Barbara Mahmoud — https://www.socialnet.de/rezensionen/13611.php — «Insgesamt ist „Warum Mozart Babys nicht schlauer macht“ ein informatives, interessantes und lesenswertes Buch, das trotz einiger (kleiner) Mängel für all jene Leser zu empfehlen ist, die neugierig (geblieben) sind und Interesse und Spaß an wissenschaftlicher Forschung und an wissenschaftlich gewonnenen Erkenntnissen haben.»

[ADDITIONAL_READING] Jarrett Christian — «Great Myths of the Brain»;

Jeffrey D. Holmes — «Great Myths of Education and Learning»;

Sergio Della Sala — «Mind Myths: exploring popular assumptions about the mind and the brain»;

Dawes, Robyn M. — «House of cards: psychology and psychotherapy built on myth»

Ernst Schraube, Charlotte Højholt — «Psychology and the Conduct of Everyday Life»

Прочие книги Лилиенфельда о психологических мифах

[BOOK_SERIES] Психология. Антология мысли
-->
1. Лилиенфельд Скотт О., Линн Стивен Джей, Русио Джон, Бейерстайн Барри Л. — 50 великих мифов популярной психологии (Эксмо, 2013).djvu
<!--- [NO_PDF] -->
1. [Степанов Сергей Сергеевич](https://mgppu.ru/people/112/981) — Мифы и тупики поп-психологии (Феникс+, 2005).epub

<a id="Негатив"></a>
## Негатив

<a id="Эффект-негативности"></a>
### Эффект негативности

<!--- [ACADEMIC_DEGREE] Baumeister, [Florida State University, CV](http://www.fsu.edu/cvdb/RBAUMEISTER.rtf) — «1978 Ph.D., Princeton University. Major: Psychology»

[JOURNALISM_DEGREE] Tierney, [City Journal](https://www.city-journal.org/contributor/john-tierney_912) — «contributing editor to the Manhattan Institute's quarterly publication, City Journal», «joining City Journal after more than two decades as a reporter and columnist with the New York Times», «Tierney has written about urban politics, economics, and culture in his column», «Prior to joining the Times, Tierney was a contributing editor to Discover and Health magazines, a staff writer at Science 81-85 magazine, a reporter for the Washington Star and the Bergen Record, and a freelance writer whose reporting took him to all seven continents. His work has been widely published, including in The Atlantic, Esquire, New York, Reader’s Digest, Vogue, the Chicago Tribune, the Wall Street Journal, and the Washington Post.»

[CRIM_CO-AUTHOR][CRIM_BIBLIOGRAPHY_END]

[CRIM_PR] Глава 3, «Wired for Bad», положительная характеристика Феликса Баумгартнера

[Is/Mass]

[INFO] Книга переведена на русский под названием «Эффект негативности» (Бомбора, 2021)

[ADDITIONAL_READING] Stephen Potter — «The Theory and Practice of Gamesmanship; Or, the Art of Winning Games Without Actually Cheating»

[NO_PDF][NO_SCEDRECO][NO_REVIEW] -->
1. Баумайстер Рой Ф., Тирни Джон — Эффект негативности. Как способность замечать плохое трансформирует нашу реальность (Эксмо, 2021).epub

<a id="Правильное-понимание-психологии"></a>
## Правильное понимание психологии

<!--- [ACADEMIC_DEGREE] “The University of Michigan, 1973-1977 - M. A., Ph.D. (Major Psychology)” — https://www.srcd.org/sites/default/files/file-attachments/stanovich_keith_cv.pdf

[POSITIVE_OR_NEUTRAL_REVIEW][REVIEW_RETELLING] Jamie Hale, MS — https://web.archive.org/web/20201030093401/https://psychcentralreviews.com/2016/how-to-think-straight-about-psychology/ ;

[GOOD_POSITIVE_REVIEW] Ian J. Deary, Professor of Differential Psychology, University of Edinburgh — https://thepsychologist.bps.org.uk/volume-23/edition-3/book-reviews — “Some things about intelligence don’t quite emerge; for example, the fact that fluid and crystallised intelligence are so highly correlated, and the many important things in life with which measured intelligence is associated: education, occupation, health, and so forth.”

[ADDITIONAL_READING] Graham Richards — «Putting Psychology in its Place»

Adrian Furnham and Dimitrios Tsivrikos — «All in the Mind. Psychology for the Curious»

Keith Stanovich — The Bias That Divides Us

Keith Stanovich — Progress in Understanding Reading. Scientific Foundations and New Frontiers

Keith Stanovich — What Intelligence Tests Miss. The Psychology of Rational Thought

[NO_SCEDRECO]
-->
1. [Stanovich Keith](https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=jWRPvwkAAAAJ) — How to Think Straight About Psychology (Pearson, 2012).pdf

<a id="Прикладная-психология"></a>
## Прикладная психология

1. [Хэйс Ники](https://scholar.google.co.uk/citations?user=p0fSo_UAAAAJ) — Популярная прикладная психология (Фаир-Пресс, 2005).pdf

<a id="Психологи"></a>
## Психологи

<a id="Биографии-психологов-классиков"></a>
### Биографии психологов-классиков

<!--- [DUPLICATE_GI]

[NO_PDF] -->
1. [Степанов Сергей Сергеевич](https://mgppu.ru/people/112/981) — Век психологии. Имена и судьбы (Эксмо, 2003).fb2

<a id="Интервью-с-выдающимися-психологами-начала-XXI-века"></a>
### Интервью с выдающимися психологами начала XXI века

<!--- [ACADEMIC_DEGREE_EDITOR] [Wikipedia](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tomasz_Witkowski), «He received a Ph.D. in Psychology from the university in 1995»

[ACADEMIC_DEGREE] Все интервьюируемые — PhD в области психологии

[N/InDi] Сборник интервью с психологами

[ADDITIONAL_READING] Tomasz Witkowski and Maciej Zatonski — «Psychology Gone Wrong: The Dark Sides of Science»

Tomacz Witkowski — «Psychology Led Astray: Cargo Cult in Science and Therapy»

Tomacz Witkowski — «Zakazana psychologia. Tom I. Pomiędzy nauką a szarlatanerią»

[POSITIVE_OR_NEUTRAL_REVIEW][REVIEW_SELF-PUBLISHING] Harriet Hall, MD, [Science-Based Medicine](https://sciencebasedmedicine.org/meet-the-psychologists/) — «If you want to meet these psychologists and learn about the current state of psychology, this book is a great way to do it. Witkowski’s unique approach has resulted in a very readable, entertaining, and very informative book. I highly recommend it.»

[NO_SCEDRECO] -->
1. Witkowski Tomash — Shaping Psychology. Perspectives on Legacy, Controversy and the Future of the Field (Palgrave Macmillan, 2020).pdf

<a id="Психологическое-письмо"></a>
## Психологическое письмо

<a id="Примеры-необходимости-примеров-в-психологическом-письме"></a>
### Примеры необходимости примеров в психологическом письме

<!--- [ACADEMIC_DEGREE] «Michael Billig obtained his Ph.D. at Bristol University in social psychology, under the supervision of the late Professor Henri Tajfel» — https://www.lboro.ac.uk/subjects/communication-media/staff/honorary/michael-billig/

[POSITIVE_OR_NEUTRAL_REVIEW] Raymond E. Fancher, Professor Emeritus and Senior Scholar at York University in Toronto, and former Editor of the Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences — https://sci-hub.se/10.1002/jhbs.22074 — «Furthermore, since most of the chapters are based on material presented in Billig's previously published works, they provide examples of one thoughtful scholar's concerns and interests overa long and productive career.», «Of course, since any example is but a fragment of a given writer's work it is often possible to think of complementary oreven counter‐examples to those he presents», «Still, most of Billig's points make for excellent conversation starters, and his general campaign for greater clarity and accessibility in psychological writing is only to be applauded», «One minor quibble concerns Billig's call for“less theory”and its implication that examples and theoriessomehow exist in opposition to each other. In fact, of course, any example must exemplify something larger andmore general than itself, and in serious psychological writing that something is commonly a more abstract conceptor theory. Therefore, I would amend Billig's prescription to suggest that we both would like to seemoretheory thatis well‐supported and illustrated by examples, and less only of that kind of theory which is bereft of meaningful examples.»

[REVIEW_LONG][REVIEW_HIGH_ERUDITION] John Richer, Department of Physiology, Anatomy and Genetics, University of Oxford, UK., Paediatric Psychology, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust, UK — https://www.researchgate.net/profile/John-Richer/publication/347949030_Human_Ethology_352020_137-156_Commentary_COMPARISONS_BETWEEN_MAINSTREAM_SOCIAL_PSYCHOLOGY_EXAMPLES_PSYCHOLOGY_AND_ETHOLOGY_STIMULATED_BY_MICHAEL_BILLIG%27S_BOOK_MORE_EXAMPLES_LESS_THEORY_1/links/5fe9d543a6fdccdcb80d3541/Human-Ethology-352020-137-156-Commentary-COMPARISONS-BETWEEN-MAINSTREAM-SOCIAL-PSYCHOLOGY-EXAMPLES-PSYCHOLOGY-AND-ETHOLOGY-STIMULATED-BY-MICHAEL-BILLIGS-BOOK-MORE-EXAMPLES-LESS-THEORY-1.pdf — «In the process Billig gently but forensically exposes the incoherence, untestablity and uselessness of some mainstream social psychology and by extension some other branches of psychology.», «Billig quotes Lewin’s formula: B=f(PE) which means Behaviour is a function of the Person and their Environment. To this an ethologist, and many others, might ironically reply, “Oh, really?” The idea was there in Darwin a century before and almost certainly centuries before. Would anyone ever have doubted it?», «but Billig, Tajfel and Bernstein seem to be in danger of committing a variant of the moralistic fallacy – the fallacy which says that because something ought not to be the case, it is not the case», « hope this book becomes a standard text for psychologists early in their studies. I for one should have been greatly helped if Michael Billig’s book had been available when I started out.»

[CRIM_NO_DIRECT_CHARGES] В книге имеется раздел, посвящённый Зигмунду Фрейду. Однако там чётко и прямо не говорится, что фрейдизм/психоанализ — это паранаука; все критические замечания в адрес учения Фрейда см. ниже. По моему мнению, этого недостаточно для неприсвоения книге категории «Ad», однако повод для кри-маркера.

[BOOK_CITATIONS] This is not because I want to discredit him personally or bring his reputation as an analyst of the mind into disrepute. Many others have done that in the past, are doing it in the present, and will continue their work of demolition well into the future. The reason for questioning Freud’s analysis of the examples from his own life relates to the fact that the founder of psychoanalysis taught his readers and his followers to look suspiciously upon what people say about themselves.

A later biographer Peter Gay writes that Freud’s self-analysis ‘has become the cherished centrepiece of psycho-analytic mythology’ (1989, p. 96).

Some critics have claimed that Freud’s arguments about the connections between the forgotten name and the substituted names are flimsy and unscientific (e.g. Timpanaro, 1976; Erwin, 1996; Grünbaum, 1984). Swales (2003), a dogged critic of Freud, has said that there was a simpler association between the three artists: Freud had seen their works displayed together in Bergamo, and this could have provided the basis for his substituting those particular two names for ‘Signorelli’.

Critics of psycho-analysis have tended to support Swales on this matter (e.g. Crews, 1995; Webster, 1996), while sympathisers have stressed the weaknesses of Swales’ interpretation (e.g. Breger, 2000; Gay, 1989). One commentator has written that Swales seems unaware that his complex interpretation sounded for all the world like a parody of Freud (Hux, 2017). There is, however, no longer a neat division between critics and supporters of Freud regarding their stance on Swales and his claims of an affair.

Следующая глава — «I have derived great enjoyment, as well as enlightenment, from reading Shaftesbury, Tucker, Freud, James and Locke. Even when I have disagreed with their arguments, I have learned much from them. Being suspicious of what Freud said about himself was itself a tribute to the power of his arguments and the grace of his writing. I would thoroughly recommend others to read him closely. I have always found that just at the moment when Freud’s arguments appear to be becoming a bit silly, then he will suddenly hit the reader with a piece of profound wisdom.»

[ADDITIONAL_READING] Scheff Thomas J. — «Microsociology: Discourse, Emotion, and Social Structure»

Scheff Thomas J. — «Bloody Revenge: Emotions, Nationalism, And War»

[NO_SCEDRECO] -->
1. Billig Michael — More Examples, Less Theory꞉ Historical Studies of Writing Psychology (Cambridge University Press, 2020).pdf

<a id="Системы-психологии"></a>
## Системы психологии

<!--- [ACADEMIC_DEGREE] «State University of New York College at Plattsburgh, assistant professor, 1963-66, associate professor, 1966-71, professor of psychology, 1971-» — https://www.encyclopedia.com/arts/culture-magazines/smith-noel-w . Не нашёл сведений об учёной степени, но на encyclopedia.com имеется информация о профессорской кафедре.

[ACADEMIC_DEGREE_EDITOR] Алексеев Анатолий Андреевич — «Ученая степень кандидата психологических наук присуждена в 1981 г., ученое звание доцента присвоено в 1984 г., ученое звание профессора – в 1997 г» — https://www.herzen.spb.ru/main/structure/inst/ipp/1442307915/1453277739/1453448294/1488548918/

[POSITIVE_OR_NEUTRAL_REVIEW] Amber Haque, Department of Psychology, International Islamic University Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia — https://www.ajis.org/index.php/ajiss/article/download/1987/1227 — «Most systems of psychology, the a uthor contends, have a theoretical orientation, but some do not have coherence and unity. As far as methodology is concerned, some systems use an eclectic approach, while others use a limited set of methods in their inquiry into human behavior and mental processes.», «The reader would wish to know why the author does not comment on the relatively poor success of interbehavioral psychology especially on the clinical side. This system appears to be weighed more on the theoretical side than to be practically useful.», «This is certainly one of those books which is inclusive and up to date. It covers the entire history of psychology in a concise yet critical manner and is unique in its presentation of the postulates, allowing the reader to do a direct comparison of each system. The comprehensiveness may however pose a problem of confusion for those not well versed in the systems and for non-serious readers.», «It could be used as a primary textbook for an advanced history and systems of psychology course.»

Michael Clayton, Jacksonville State University — https://sci-hub.se/10.1007/BF03395410 — «Instead of mechanically categorizing people and dates, Smith takes a unique approach in that it is more systematic and coherent. Psychological systems are grouped according to their epistemologies and sources of causation.», «Also unlike most history books, Smith acknowledges his biases right up front, identifying himself as a "contextual interactionist." Another overarching goal is to provide an informed choice to readers. In this regard, Smith covers all of the classical systems plus several "interactional" systems that rarely, if ever, find equal treatment in history texts.», «Unfortunately, it is quite rare to find the postulates of a system systematically outlined.», «In fact, one student has already remarked that it gave her a whole new understanding of some of the things she is learning in subsequent psychology courses.», «That, to me, is reason enough to expend the time and effort to summarize and without reservation recommend this textbook to interested readers.»

[ADDITIONAL_READING] Джеймс Прохазка, Джон Норкросс — «Системы психотерапии».

Деннис Кун — «Все тайны поведения человека»

[BOOK_SERIES] Психологическая энциклопедия
 -->
1. Смит Ноэль В. — Современные системы психологии. История, постулаты, практика (Прайм-ЕВРОЗНАК, 2003).pdf

<a id="Социальная-психология"></a>
## Социальная психология

<a id="Познание-людьми-друг-друга"></a>
### Познание людьми друг друга

<a id="Восприятие-и-понимание-человеком-человека"></a>
#### Восприятие и понимание человеком человека

<!--- [ACADEMIC_DEGREE] Доктор психологических наук, профессор. Действительный член (академик) РАО. Главный научный сотрудник Психологического института РАО — https://psy.su/persons/in_memoriam/psy/27164/

[ACADEMIC_DEGREE_REVIEWERS] Ломов Борис Фёдорович — доктор психологических наук — https://psyjournals.ru/moscow_psychologists/issue/lomov.shtml ; не нашёл информации о В.В. Сталине, кандидате психологических наук

[FILE_CORRUPTED] Многочисленные ошибки в тексте файла

[NOTE] Издание 1982 полнее более поздних

[NO_REVIEW] -->
1. Бодалёв Алексей Александрович — Восприятие и понимание человека человеком (Издательство Московского университета, 1982).pdf

<a id="Учебники-по-социальной-психологии"></a>
### Учебники по социальной психологии

<a id="Американские-учебники-социальной-психологии"></a>
#### Американские учебники социальной психологии

<!--- [ACADEMIC_DEGREE] «Ph.D. in Psychology from University of Iowa, 1967» — https://myers.socialpsychology.org/

[ADDITIONAL_READING]

[NO_REVIEW] Не нашёл доступных рецензий ни на одном из языков, на которых была издана книга — http://www.davidmyers.org/davidmyers/assets/FullVita_12.pdf#page=19

[DUPLICATE_GI]

[BOOK_SERIES] Мастера психологии
-->
1. Майерс Дэвид Гай — Социальная психология (Питер, 2010).pdf
<!--- [ACADEMIC_DEGREE] Чалдини — [Influence at Work, CV](https://cdn.influenceatwork.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/cv-september-2018.pdf) — «1967-70 — Graduate study in Social Psychology at the University of North Carolina—Chapel Hill (Ph.D., June, 1970); 1970-71— Postgraduate study in Social Psychology at Columbia University.»

Кенрик — [Arizona State University, CV](https://view.officeapps.live.com/op/view.aspx?src=https%3A%2F%2Fisearch.asu.edu%2Fprofile%2F30447%2Fcv) — «1976 Ph.D. in Psychology (Social), Arizona State University»

Нейберг — [Arizona State University, CV](https://isearch.asu.edu/sites/default/files/cv/Vita%20Neuberg_0.pdf) — «Ph.D. (1987) Carnegie-Mellon University, Social Psychology; Dissertation: Interpersonal expectancies and impression formation goals: Overriding the impact of negative expectancies on social interactions and impression formation»

[ACADEMIC_DEGREE_EDITOR] Свенцицкий Анатолий Леонидович — [Санкт-Петербургский государственный университет, Факультет психологии](https://psy.spbu.ru/department/teachers/601-sventsitskiy-al) — «Доктор психологических наук, профессор кафедры социальной психологии»

[CRIM_BESTSELLER] [Influence at Work](https://www.influenceatwork.com/) — «Dr. Cialdini’s books are published in 44 languages and have sold over 7 million copies. He is a New York Times, Wall Street Journal and USA Today bestselling author»

[CRIM_SPEAKER] [Чалдини](https://www.influenceatwork.com/speaking/)

[Kr/Te]

[BOOK_SERIES] Главный учебник

[ADDITIONAL_READING] Аронсон Эллиот, Уилсон Тим, Эйкерт Робин — «Социальная психология: психологические законы поведения человека в социуме»

Свенцицкий Анатолий Леонидович — «Социальная психология»

Кэтлин Вердербер, Рудольф Вердербер — «Психология общения. Тайны эффективного взаимодействия»

Реан Артур Александрович (под редакцией) — «Психология человека от рождения до смерти»

Дафт Ричард Л. — «Теория организации»

Рубин Джеффри, Пруйт Дин, Ким Сунг Хе — «Социальный конфликт꞉ эскалация, тупик, разрешение»

Крэйн Уильям — «Психология развития человека. 25 главных теорий» или «Теории развития. Секреты формирования личности»

Фрейджер Роберт, Фейдимен Джеймс — «Личность. Теории, упражнения, эксперименты»

Ричард Харрис — «Психология массовых коммуникаций»

Кенрик Дуглас — «Секс, инстинкты и смысл жизни»

[NOTE_FULL_NAME] Чалдини Роберт, Кенрик Дуглас, Нейберг Стивен — Социальная психология. Пойми себя, чтобы понять других! (Прайм-Еврознак, 2002)

[NO_REVIEW] -->
1. Чалдини Роберт, Кенрик Дуглас, Нейберг Стивен — Социальная психология. (Прайм-Еврознак, 2002).pdf

<a id="Европейские-учебники-социальной-психологии"></a>
#### Европейские учебники социальной психологии

<!--- [ACADEMIC_DEGREE] Фишер — «2006 Habilitation LMU München, Sozialpsychologie» — https://www.uni-regensburg.de/psychologie-paedagogik-sport/psychologie-fischer/team/fischer/

Джандер — «Dr. Kathrin Jander hat die Firmenleitung der ausdauerakademie.de im Jahr 2015 übernommen. Die Diplompsychologin und zertifizierte Sportpsychologin» — https://www.ausdauerakademie.de/ueber-uns

Крюгер — «Ph.D. psychology, minor in organizational behavior (School of Business), Uof Oregon 1988»

[ACADEMIC_DEGREE_EDITOR] Согласно самой книге, «Ebenso danken wir Frau Dr. Christiane Grosser für die Übernahme der Lektorats arbeiten an diesem Buch». Я не нашёл надёжных свидетельств существования Dr. Christiane Grosser; разве что есть такая автор книги — https://libgen.rs/book/index.php?md5=3006638EAFC68166F4FB2D11EAE34C04 .

[POSITIVE_OR_NEUTRAL_REVIEW][REVIEW_LONG] Dr. Alexander N. Wendt Dr. (Psychologie) und Hannes Wendler — https://www.socialnet.de/rezensionen/24846.php — «Dasjenige nämlich, Bacheloranden der Psychologie oder interessierten Laien „den Gegenstand der Sozialpsychologie anschaulich darzustellen“ (ebd.). Einen besonderen Akzent in dieser Darstellung setzen die AutorInnen in der Besprechung politisch brisanter Themen und der einhergehenden Absage an die Reiteration aller „Klassiker“ des Feldes.», «Dieses Einführungsbuch leistet einen Rundumschlag zu den wichtigsten Themenfeldern der Sozialpsychologie, von den historischen und wissenschaftstheoretischen Grundlagen, über die Besprechung und Bewertung zentraler Forschungsparadigmen, weiter zu klassischen Befunden aus der angewandten Forschung bis hin zur Einordnung alles dessen in einem gesamtgesellschaftlichen Zusammenhang.», «Es wird der confirmation bias (Personen suchen mehr entscheidungskonsistente alsinkonsistente Informationen auf) als ein typischer aus der Dissonanztheorie vorhersagbarer Effekt eingeführt (…) Wo es zweifelsfrei löblich ist, ein reiches und diverses Befundfeld auch in dessen Vielstimmigkeit gelten zu lassen, bleiben es die AutorInnen hier schuldig klar zu machen, dass die Rede von Dissonanz in beiden Fällen äquivok sein muss, oder sinngemäß aufgefächert wurde in evaluativ-kognitive Dissonanz und evaluativ-motivationale Dissonanz.», «An manchen Stellen treten die AutorInnen vor dem Vorsatz des „so detailliert wie nötig“ (V) zu kurz (…) Die möglichen Konter über Platzsparoder Schwierigkeitsargumente scheinen insbesondere vor dem ausgiebig und tief diskutierten Schlusskapitel zu den sozialen Neurowissenschaften entkräftet. Vermutlich hat man es hier mit Akzentuierungen zu tun, welche, gerade im Lehrbuchformat mit der entsprechenden Weitläufigkeit im Einfluss auf nachkommende Generationen von Forschenden, bedenklich stimmen könnten.», «Weniger gelungen ist die Kritik an evolutionstheoretischen Perspektiven auf prosoziales Verhalten, insofern die AutorInnen insinuieren, dass die Rolle emotionaler Prozesse durch eine Betonung von Vorteilen bei der differentiellen Reproduktion unberücksichtigt bleiben müsste (64). (…) Hier wird ein zu enger Begriff der evolutionären Erklärung präsupponiert», «Im Aggressionskapitel kommt die für Einsteiger bestimmt überraschende These der Lernbarkeit von Aggression besonders schön zur Deutlichkeit», «An anderer Stelle wird in der Interpretation einer Studie zur Selbstkategorisierungstheorie deren Ergebnisse als „Beweis“ (149) für diese ausgezeichnet, wobei doch im Einführungskapitel zu den wissenschaftstheoretischen Grundlagen der Sozialpsychologie dem Positivismus eine Absage erteilt wurde», «Die Ausführungen zu sozialen Dilemmata bestechen insbesondere durch die feinfühlig differenzierte und verständlich ausgeführte Kontrastierung der verschiedenen betrachteten Spieltypen», «kontroverse Zusammenhänge für ein Lehrbuch stellenweise essayistisch oder gar moralisierend liest», «es wird vielmehr darüber hinaus der durch ein Lehrbuch immer auch in eine Wissenschaftsgemeinschaft enkulturierte Nachwuchsgeneration eine Weise der Unmündigkeit anerzogen, insofern diesen weder ein Bewusstsein zur möglichen Problematisierbarkeit noch zur möglichen Rechtfertigung jener Denkweise aufgezeigt wird.», «An einigen Stellen gehen die Ausführungen womöglich zu weit ins biologische, wenn man dies aus der Sicht von Psychologie-Studierenden angeht (etwa 227). Offenbar operieren die AutorInnen im Bewusstsein der Erziehung der künftigen Forschergenerationen. Man wünschte sich nur ein tiefergreifendes Bewusstsein. Eines auch, das nicht vor der Philosophie Halt macht.», «Ähnlich ist auch die psychologiegeschichtliche Einführung im vorliegenden Werk auf die in der Tradition des Kognitivismus stehendende Perspektive eingeschränkt.», «Insgesamt besehen handelt es sich bei Sozialpsychologie für Bachelor um einen soliden Einführungsband für die intendierte Lesendenschaft von Psychologie-Bacheloranden und interessierten Laien. Es werden die zentralen Pfeiler der modernen Sozialpsychologie mal breiter mal tiefer, immer aber verständlich und sachgemäß durchgegangen, wobei die Wahl der vorgestellten Studien besonders geglückt ist.», «Neben der Diskussion vornehmlich politisch oder ökonomisch interessanter Ereignisse aus der jüngeren Vergangenheit wenden die AutorInnen den Fokus ebenso auf die Alltagsintuitionen der Lesenden, sodass gerade StudienanfängernInnen prophylaktisch Sorgen um die Abgehobenheit ihres Studiengegenstandes genommen werden. Vielmehr wird es jenen ein Leichtes sein, Anlaufpunkte dafür zu finden, die eigenen Interessen in der „konkreten Welt“ zu verankern.», «Alles dessen ungeachtet hat man es mit einem breit aufgestellten aber kompakt geschriebenen Einführungsbuch zu tun, welches sowohl Einblicke in die Psychologie, die Politik aber auch die Neurowissenschaften bietet», «Während die Lesbarkeit durch eine allgemeinverständliche Schreibweise gesichert ist, kommt in der Arbeit der wissenschaftstheoretische Tiefgang, der die Einführung in die Sozialpsychologie als Disziplin und nicht nur als Kenntnis von Individuen in sozialen Kontexten gestatten würde, zu kurz»
-->
1. Fischer Peter, Jander Kathrin, Krueger Joachim I. — Sozialpsychologie für Bachelor (Springer-Lehrbuch, 2018).pdf
<!--- [Kr/Hb]

[ACADEMIC_DEGREE] Хьюстон, [University of Oxford, CV](https://oxford.academia.edu/MilesHewstone/CurriculumVitae) — «D.Phil. in social psychology, University of Oxford/Trinity College» 

Штрёбе, [Social Psychology Network, CV](https://view.officeapps.live.com/op/embed.aspx?src=http%3A%2F%2Fstroebe.socialpsychology.org%2Fcv%2FVita-2019.doc) — «Dr. phil., University of Münster Dissertation: "Eine experimentelle und theoretische Untersuchung des Volumen-Gewicht-Effektes." (An experimental and theoretical study of the Size-Weight-Effect); Ph.D., University London (London School of Economics and Political Science) Dissertation: "An experimental and theoretical study of social judgement."»

[ACADEMIC_DEGREE_TRANSLATOR] Перевод с английского под редакцией Тахира Юсуповича Базарова, [МГУ, факультет психологии](http://www.psy.msu.ru/people/bazarov.html) — «Доктор психологических наук, профессор», «Кандидатская диссертация на тему «Социально-психологическая ориентировка непосредственного руководителя трудового коллектива» (1981)», «Докторская диссертация на тему «Социально-психологические методы и технологии управления персоналом организации» (1999)»

Перевод с английского — Любимова Галина Юрьевна, [МГУ, факультет психологии](http://www.psy.msu.ru/people/lubimova.html) — «кандидат психологических наук, старший научный сотрудник», «Тема кандидатской диссертации: “Объективная индикация процесса становления слухового перцептивного навыка”»

[ACADEMIC_DEGREE_CONSULTANT] Екатерина Михайловна Дубовская, [МГУ, факультет психологии](http://www.psy.msu.ru/people/dubovskaya.html) — кандидат психологических наук, доцент 

[POSITIVE_OR_NEUTRAL_REVIEW] Kevin Durrheim, Department of Psychology University of Natal Pietermaritzburg, [Psychology in society (PINS)](https://www.pins.org.za/pins/pins22/pins22_bookreview05_Durrheim.pdf) — «The first edition of an Introduction to social psychology carved a niche for itself in the textbook market by trading on the divide between American and European approaches to the subject.», «Although the arguments are fairly interesting they are spoiled to an extent by monologic style which glosses over the major theoretical and political difficulties with evolutionary approaches.», «Don’t let the word “construction” in the title of this part mislead: these chapters do not grapple with theoretical dilemmas surrounding social construction and the interface between individual and society.», «The reader cannot but be impressed, however, with the clear and well organized discussion of the topics, the level of coverage, and the manner in which the very latest literature is integrated into the discussion. The authors are clearly experts, highly conversant with their topics.», «However, bar his disposing of personality theories as “lay” or “popular” , his account of social identity theory is carefully considered, and the chapter as a whole is excellent.», «However, despite its self-proclaimed European perspective, the text did not strike me as very different from all those others which have been developed to meet the requirements of the US educational system.», «Consequently, the arguably most important recent European developments in social psychology by scholars such as Harré, Billig and Shotter don’t get a mention in the text.», «Although the postmodernist textbook, Social psychology: A critical agenda, by Stainton Rogers, Stenner, Gleeson, and Stainton Rogers (1995) tends to gloss over substantive theory in meeting its critical agenda, it is nonetheless an excellent text which includes topics such as identity, common sense, and gender and sexuality which are sorely missing from the Introduction to social psychology. Wetherell’s (1996) Identities, groups, and social issues, is, in my opinion, the best text presently available.», «In comparison with these alternative approaches, the Introduction to social psychology is lacking certain topics, empiricist, and theoretically circumscribed.», «If you are in the market for a mainstream social psychology textbook, this one is well worth considering.»

Meyerhuber Sylke, [Universität Bremen](https://www.uni-bremen.de/artec/mitglieder/dr-sylke-meyerhuber), [Journal für Psychologie](https://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/bitstream/handle/document/3370/ssoar-journpsycho-1998-4-rez-meyerhuber.pdf) — «Damit dürfte das Buch sich besonders für Studierende als wertvoll erweisen, die erstmals Zugang zur Sozialpsychologie oder einem ihrer Teilgebiete suchen.», «Nur selten gewann ich den Eindruck, ein Autor habe in seiner Überblicksdarstellung eine einseitige Auswahl unter den dargestellten Vertretern eines Gebiets getroffen, so beispielsweise im Kapitel zu sozialpsychologischen Methoden. Dort empfand ich zudem einen starken Bruch zum sonstigen Sprachstil des Buches: technokratisch und mit der Lebensweltwirklichkeit von Menschen seltsam unverbunden. Befremdlich auch, daß hier nur Umfrageforschung, Quasiexperiment und echtes Zufallsexperiment diskutiert werden. Qualitative, kommunikative Methoden jenseits des Labors zur Verständnisgenerierung sozialer Phänomene, wie z.B. die Gruppendiskussion oder die reflexive Haltung des Forschenden als Erkenntnisinstrument, habe ich vermißt.», «Beim Lesen vermißt habe ich in den Einzelbeiträgen die Rückbindung der Sozialpsychologie an die lebensweltliche Praxis; zum Beispiel an den Lebensbereich der Arbeit. Im Sachverzeichnis findet sich dazu lediglich ein Hinweis zum Stichwort "Arbeitsgruppe", ansonsten kein Stichwort zur Arbeitswelt; unter Organisation, Be trieb, Sozialpsychologie der Arbeit etc. suchte ich vergeblich. Diesen Eindruck kann auch das letzte Kapitel "Angewandte Sozialpsychologie" mit Bezügen zum Gesundheitsund Rechtswesen sowie umweltbezogenem Verhalten kaum mildern. Die mittels der Sozialpsychologie zu verstehenden Menschen bleiben "Versuchspersonen". So erweist sich auch dieses Grundlagenwerk als ein eher an der nreinen Wissenschaftc( statt an anwendungsbezogener Sozialpsychologie ausgerichtetes Einführungswerk: die Spaltung der Grundlagenund Anwendungsorientierung in der Psychologie bildet sich hier ab. Eine Übersetzung der Theorien auf Situationen im Alltag von Menschen wird der Lesende selbst leisten müssen.», «Ich denke, als Einführungswerk für Studierende der Psychologie oder angrenzender Wissenschaften und für den Überblicksuchenden zu einem Bereich der Sozialpsychologie eignet sich das besprochene Buch trotz der genannten Einschränkungen hervorragend.»

[ADDITIONAL_READING] Todd D. Nelson — «Getting Grounded in Social Psychology»

Daniel Richardson — «Social Psychology For Dummies»

Anabel Quan-Haase, Lorne Tepperman — Real-Life Sociology: A Canadian Approach

[BOOK_SERIES] Зарубежный учебник

[DUPLICATE_GI]
-->
1. [Хьюстон Майлс](https://www.mmg.mpg.de/person/96839/2553), [Штрёбе Вольфганг](https://www.rug.nl/staff/wolfgang.stroebe/) — Введение в социальную психологию. Европейский подход (Юнити-Дана, 2004).pdf

<a id="Учебники-психологии"></a>
## Учебники психологии

<!--- [ACADEMIC_DEGREE] Лилиенфельд — «his Ph.D. in Psychology (Clinical) from the University of Minnesota in 1990» — http://psychology.emory.edu/home/people/faculty/lilienfeld-scott.html ;

Линн — «Ph.D., Indiana University, l976. Major: Clinical Psychology. Minor: Sociology» — https://www.binghamton.edu/psychology/docs/cv/slynn.cv.pdf ;

Нами — «998 Ph.D. Cognitive Psychology, Northwestern University» — http://psychology.emory.edu/cognition/namy/vitae2014.pdf

[ACADEMIC_DEGREE_REVIEWERS] На страницах XX—XXIII книги огромный список людей, «who evaluated chapters and provided expert analysis on critical topic areas. Others served on an advisory council, participated in focus groups, conducted usability studies, ran class testing of chapters, and attended our faculty forums for the text.»

[NO_REVIEW] -->
1. Lilienfeld Scott O., Lynn Steven Jay, Namy Laura L. — Psychology. From Inquiry to Understanding (Pearson, 2018).pdf

<a id="Экспериментальная-психология"></a>
## Экспериментальная психология

<a id="Классические-психологические-эксперименты"></a>
### Классические психологические эксперименты

<!--- [DUPLICATE_GI]

[BOOK_SAME] «Живая психология. Уроки знаменитых экспериментов (Эксмо, 2012)» -->
1. [Степанов Сергей Сергеевич](https://mgppu.ru/people/112/981) — Живая психология. Уроки классических экспериментов (ПЕР СЭ, 2004).pdf
<!--- [DUPLICATE_GI]

[CRIM_ANTI-SJW] “Отравление колодца” в адрес зоозащитников — «Число общественных группировок, выступающих в защиту животных, постоянно растет, а их члены становятся все более активными и воинственными», «Кроме того, наиболее радикальные активисты движения за права животных считают, что ценность жизни всех живых существ может быть проранжирована в соответствии с их способностью испытывать боль», «Итак, крайнюю точку зрения представляют многие люди, считающие, что исследования, проводимые на животных, антигуманны и неэтичны, а потому должны быть запрещены.»

[ADDITIONAL_READING] Ганс Айзенк, Курт Бартол — Эксперимент. Самые жестокие исследования в психологии -->
1. [Хок Роджер](https://www.mendocino.edu/faculty/roger-hock) — 40 исследований, которые потрясли психологию. Секреты выдающихся экспериментов (Прайм-Еврознак, 2003).djvu

<a id="Проведение-психологических-экспериментов"></a>
### Проведение психологических экспериментов

<!--- [BOOK_SERIES] Высшее профессиональное образование -->
1. [Готтсданкер Роберт](https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/robert-gottsdanker-chelovek-i-issledovatel) — Основы психологического эксперимента. Учебное пособие (Академия, 2005).pdf

<a id="Работа"></a>
# Работа

<a id="Базовый-доход"></a>
## Базовый доход

<!--- [ACADEMIC_DEGREE] Ван Парайс — «DPhil, University of Oxford, Subfaculty of Philosophy», «UCLouvain (University of Louvain), Chaire Hoover d'éthique économique et sociale» https://uclouvain.academia.edu/PhilippeVanParijs/CurriculumVitae ; Вандерборхт — «Professor of Political Science at Université Saint-Louis», https://uclouvain.be/fr/chercher/hoover/presentation-0.html

[BOOK_SCEDRECO] Моисеев Сергей Рустамович — доктор экономических наук, директор департамента финансовой стабильности ЦБ РФ — https://www.bankdelo.ru/about/editorial-council

[POSITIVE_OR_NEUTRAL_REVIEW] https://sci-hub.se/10.1111/roiw.12358 , https://ssir.org/books/reviews/entry/income_for_all

[BOOK_OR_AUTHOR_OR_CONCEPT_CRITICISM] https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/186082/1/CESifo-Forum-2018-3-3.pdf — рабочая критика

[CRIM] Тема дискуссионная: https://dspace.library.uu.nl/bitstream/handle/1874/382957/Annotatie_6_het_basisinkomen.pdf

[ADDITIONAL_READING] Philippe van Parijs, Joshua Cohen, Joel Rogers — «What's Wrong with a Free Lunch?»

Philippe Van Parijs — «Real Freedom for All: What (if anything) can justify capitalism?»

[BOOK_SERIES] Экономическая теория

[INFO] Проект серийных монографий по социально-экономическим и гуманитарным наукам -->
1. [Ван Парайс Филипп](https://uclouvain.academia.edu/PhilippeVanParijs/CurriculumVitae), [Вандерборхт Янник](https://uclouvain.be/fr/chercher/hoover/yannick-vanderborght.html) — Базовый доход. Радикальный проект для свободного общества и здоровой экономики (Высшая школа экономики, 2020).pdf

<a id="HC-9"></a>
### HC

<!--- [ACADEMIC_DEGREE] Srnicek PhD thesis for London School of Economics and Political Science — https://etheses.lse.ac.uk/803/1/Srnicek_Representing_Complexity.pdf

Alex Williams completed a PhD thesis entitled Complexity and Hegemony at the politics department of the University of East London in 2015 — https://www.urbanomic.com/contributor/alex-williams/ , https://sci-hub.se/https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/978-3-030-19795-7.pdf

[BOOK_OR_AUTHOR_OR_CONCEPT_CRITICISM] Рабочая критика — Callum McGregor — http://concept.lib.ed.ac.uk/article/view/2567/3664 , Franco Bonomi Bezzo — https://sreview.soc.cas.cz/pdfs/csr/2019/03/05.pdf , Brian Bernhardt — https://sci-hub.se/10.1080/07393148.2018.1528672 , Michael Gardiner — https://sci-hub.se/10.1177/0263276416656760 . Жёсткая — Florence Gildea, https://sci-hub.se/10.1111/1467-923X.12850 , Nathan Brown — https://www.parrhesiajournal.org/parrhesia25/parrhesia25_brown.pdf .

[POSITIVE_OR_NEUTRAL_REVIEW] Mareile Pfannebecker and J.A. Smith — https://eprints.lse.ac.uk/67323/1/LSE%20RB%20Long%20Read%20Review,%20'What%20Will%20We%20Do%20in%20the%20Post-Work%20Utopia'%20by%20Mareile%20Pfannebecker%20and%20JA%20Smith.pdf

[NO_SCEDRECO] -->
1. [Срничек Ник](https://www.kcl.ac.uk/people/nick-srnicek), [Уильямс Алекс](https://sci-hub.se/https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/978-3-030-19795-7.pdf) — Изобретая будущее. Посткапитализм и мир без труда (Strelka Press, 2019).pdf

<a id="Безработица"></a>
## Безработица

<a id="Устные-истории-о-безработице"></a>
### Устные истории о безработице

<!--- [JOURNALISM_DEGREE] [Perspectives](https://books.google.ru/books?id=ynNORbls0bkC&pg=RA1-PA47) — «Harry Maurer, a former editor at The Nation»

[CRIM_IDEOLOGY] Послесловие в русле советской идеологии

[N/InDi]

[ADDITIONAL_READING] Grant Michelson, Shaun Ryan — «Just Work»

Gig: Americans Talk about Their Jobs — «Gig: Americans Talk About Their Jobs»

Zhang Xinxin and Sang Ye — «Chinese Lives: an Oral History of Contemporary China»

Roy Kriegler and Grant Stendal — «At work: Australian experiences»

D. W. Gibson — «Not working: people talk about losing a job and finding their way in today's changing economy»

Craig Taylor — «Londoners: The Days and Nights of London Now - as Told by Those Who Love it, Hate it, Live it, Left it and Long for it»

Nicholas Eberstadt — «Men Without Work: America's Invisible Crisis»

[NO_OCR][NO_SCEDRECO][NO_REVIEW] -->
1. Маурер Гарри — Без работы. Устная история безработных (Прогресс, 1986).djvu

<a id="Бредовая-работа"></a>
## Бредовая работа

<!--- [ACADEMIC_DEGREE] Doctorate in Anthropology, University of Chicago — https://static1.squarespace.com/static/5ae0ebef1aef1da34cfb6554/t/5afc1d982b6a28e917ff1241/1526472177831/DG-spring_summer+2017_18-CV+PUBLISH.pdf . В социальных науках учёного звания не имеет. В рассматриваемых теме его, возможно, можно отнести к категории «Учёные, работающие в другой теме».

[ACADEMIC_DEGREE_EDITOR] Григорий Борисович Юдин, кандидат наук, «Онтология и теория познания» — https://www.hse.ru/staff/greg.yudin

[POSITIVE_OR_NEUTRAL_REVIEW] Ziyun Fan, Northumbria University — https://sci-hub.se/10.1177/0170840620979513 ;

[REVIEW_RETELLING] Guillermo Stefano Rosa Gómez, Doutorando em Antropologia Social, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul — https://journals.openedition.org/horizontes/3581 — «Graeber não desconsidera que existem bullshit jobs no setor público, mas direciona sua crítica ao crescimento do setor F.I.R.E. (finanças, seguros e imobiliário) como o que mais acumula esse tipo de emprego.»;

[REVIEW_RETELLING] Agathe Lelièvre, Doctorante au département de science politique de l’Université de Montréal — https://journals.openedition.org/lectures/29421

Jürgen Rudolph, Kaplan Higher Education Singapore — https://journals.sfu.ca/jalt/index.php/jalt/article/download/47/45 — «While I regard Graeber’s book as largely polemical in nature, and there are certainly no claims of statistical representativeness, we should still be cautious with some of the more sweeping generalisations», «Graeber also seems to omit tech and other start-ups (that tend to have flat organisational structures) and larger, innovative organisations (famously radical examples are Valve, Morning Star and China’s Haier) from his analysis. There is also nothing much on the gig economy which appears to be an important trend in the realm of work.»

Thomas Kikauer, Catherine Link, Western Sydney University — https://sci-hub.se/10.1111/awr.12205

[LONG_REVIEW] Peggy De Prins & David Stuer, Antwerp Management School — https://www.tijdschriftvoorarbeidsvraagstukken.nl/scripts/shared/artikel_pdf.php?id=TA-36-3-2 — «Sommige auteurs focussen hierbij vooral op de (gebrekkige) empirische onderbouwing van het verhaal en zoeken naar bevestiging, nuancering of ontkrachting van Graebers inschatting van het fenomeen op basis van bestaande databanken.», «Hij reflecteert vooral op macroniveau over mogelijke politieke of ideologische keuzes en oplossingen (bijvoorbeeld in de vorm van substantiële arbeidsduurvermindering of universeel basisinkomen), maar vergeet daardoor het mesoniveau van het bedrijf. Onze onderzoeksresultaten suggereren alvast dat er op dit niveau heel wat mogelijkheden openliggen.»

[BOOK_OR_AUTHOR_OR_CONCEPT_CRITICISM] Howard Richards, University of Santiago, Chile — https://sci-hub.se/10.1080/14767430.2019.1572942 — «One wonders what Graeber wouldfind if he studied Africa, Latin America and/or Asia.», «The disappearance of bullshit jobs would be too awful to contemplate. Nobody will contemplate it.Graebermust be aware of these Keynes-style arguments.», «Since the economyalready always tends toward stagnation because the insufficiency of the inducement toinvest has already always been a bottleneck economic problem, the disappearance of bullshitjobs would be too awful to contemplate. Nobody will contemplate it.»

Thomas Coutrot, Direction de l’animation de la recherche, des études et des statistiques (Dares) — https://journals.openedition.org/travailemploi/9672 — «Sur le plan quantitatif, D. Graeber estime que le phénomène des «bullshit jobs» est d’une ampleur considérable, mais ne peut s’appuyer que sur un sondage de taille limitée réalisé par l’institut YouGov UK, d’après lequel 37 % des répondants estiment que leur travail n’apporte pas "une contribution significative au monde"», «Le sentiment d’inutilité et d’ennui ne concerne donc pas que des emplois qualifiés : les témoignages de l’ouvrage reflètent un biais vers les professions intellectuelles.», «Stimulant et souvent amusant, le livre de D. Graeber souffre néanmoins d’un trop faible ancrage dans les sciences du travail, qui l’empêche d’avancer vers des pistes crédibles de solutions.», «L’absence de références aux sciences du travail contribue sans doute à expliquer la faiblesse des propositions avancées par D. Graeber pour remédier à la situation, et qui se résument en fait à l’instauration d’un revenu de base.», «Mais, plus fondamentalement, en quoi le revenu de base permettrait-il de faire reculer les "bullshit jobs"»

Dr. Georg Jochum, TU München — https://sci-hub.se/10.1515/srsr-2019-0033 — «Wissenschaftli-chen Standards genügt es allerdings nur bedingt. Der Wert der empirischen Basiskann angezweifelt werden, da die angeführten Darstellungen der Bullshit-Jobseinem durch Graebers ursprünglichen Artikel und die daran anschließende An-frage per Twitter selbst erzeugten, sehr selektiven Resonanzraum entstammen.», «Wissenschaftli-chen Standards genügt es allerdings nur bedingt. Der Wert der empirischen Basiskann angezweifelt werden, da die angeführten Darstellungen der Bullshit-Jobseinem durch Graebers ursprünglichen Artikel und die daran anschließende An-frage per Twitter selbst erzeugten, sehr selektiven Resonanzraum entstammen.», «Auch die besondere Fokussierung Graebers auf Bullshit-Jobs des mittlerenManagements und des Verwaltungsbereichs kann problematisiert werden.», «Auch das häufig wiederkehrende Argument, dass man viele Bullshit-Jobs„ohne Weiteres automatisieren“(84) könnte, ist zu hinterfragen. Damit wider-spricht er nicht nur mit der eigenen Argumentation, denn wenn eine Tätigkeittatsächlich völlig sinnlos wäre, so würde auch deren Automatisierung keinenSinn machen.»

-->
1. Гребер Дэвид — Бредовая работа. Трактат о распространении бессмысленного труда (Ад Маргинем Пресс, 2020).djvu

<a id="Гибкий-капитализм"></a>
## Гибкий капитализм

<!--- [Is/Mono]

[ACADEMIC_DEGREE] [Academia Europaea](https://www.ae-info.org/ae/Member/Sennett_Richard/CV) — «Harvard University Ph.D., 1969», «In the 1980s he served as an advisor to UNESCO and as president of the American Council on Work; he also taught occasionally at Harvard. In the mid 1990s Mr. Sennett began to divide his time between New York University and the London School of Economics. In addition to these academic homes, he maintains informal connections to MIT and to Trinity College, Cambridge University.» В англоязычной Википедии [написано](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Sennett#Early_life_and_education): «graduating with his Ph.D. in the History of American Civilization in 1969», но источников не приведено.

[ACADEMIC_DEGREE_TRANSLATOR] Владимир Иванович Супрун, [научный журнал «Идеи и идеалы»](https://ideaidealy.nsuem.ru/authors/suprun-v-i) — «доктор философских наук», «Кандидатская диссертация по теме «Проблема личности. Философско-методологические основы анализа» (защитил в Томском госуниверситете – 1978 г.).», «Докторская диссертация по теме «Современная западная футурология» (защитил в Ленинградском госуниверситете – 1988 г.).»

[NO_SCEDRECO]

[REVIEW_CHECK] 2021-8-23

[POSITIVE_OR_NEUTRAL_REVIEW] Fernand Morin, Université Laval, [Relations Industrielles/Industrial Relations](https://sci-hub.se/10.2307/23077433) — «Le professeur Sennett fait appel à quelques si tuations bien concrètes et relativement simples pour étayer ses propos. Ainsi, le lecteur peut facilement partager ce discours tellement, sans être aussi un féru de la sociologie du travail», «Nous devons reconnaître que la lecture de cet ouvrage, Le travail sans qualités ne pourrait qu'enrichir et stimuler la ré flexion de l'étudiant en relations indus trielles. De même en serait-il pour toute personne qui s'intéresse vraiment aux questions du travail et surtout, à la per sonne même du travailleur.»

Rogério Ferreira de Andrade, [Caleidoscópio: Revista de Comunicação e Cultura](https://recil.grupolusofona.pt/bitstream/10437/10438/1/Caleidosc%C3%B3pio_1_2001_RogerioFAndrade.pdf) — «Entretanto, teremos de aguardar novos episó dios da saga da sociedade de informação e do flextime para comprovarmos a validade de um aforismo de Richard Sennett com que finali zamos esta recensão: assumir riscos constantemente torna-se um exercício de depressão.»

Rade Kalanj, [Socijalna ekologija: časopis za ekološku misao i sociologijska istraživanja okoline](https://hrcak.srce.hr/file/209164) — «Rastakanje karaktera zaista je uspješna knjiga. Tri suje ugledne novine proglasile najboljom knjigom godine (Business Week, Economist i New Statesman).», «Ocijenjena je kao djelo koje otvara nove pers— pektive socijalnim znanostiima», «Drugo, njezin je diskurs dobra kombinacija sociološkog i ekonomskog prustupa, što daje osobitu vrijednost utemeljenosti i činjeničnoj određenosti autorovih sudova.»

Rosita C. de Loyola Hummel, Mestre em História Social pela Universidade Federal do Paraná; Professora da PUC-Paraná, [História: Questões & Debates](https://revistas.ufpr.br/historia/article/viewFile/2685/2222) — «A leitura do livro de Sennett não desperta certezas nem pretende levantar posições teóricas, mas certamente questiona as transformações recentes que envolvem a todos numa rede flexível e incerta, em que o caráter não constitui a linha norteadora da vida e do trabalho.»

Tom T. Kristensen, Roskilde Universitetscenter, [Dansk Sociologi](https://rauli.cbs.dk/index.php/dansksociologi/article/download/737/773/) — «Det er min opfattelse, at Sennett har skrevet en god og inspirerende bog. Han påpeger en række kritisable forhold ved det nye fleksible regime, som det er værd at diskutere i en bredere offentlighed.», «Sennetts “løsning” på en række af den fleksible kapitalismes integrationsproblemer består i en fokusering på de lokale ressourcers regulering af virksomhederne. Det er imidlertid efter min mening en uklar “løsning”, og hermed adskiller Sennett sig fra Marxog Negt traditionen, hvor kampen mod disintegration og elendiggørelse kræver frigørelse fra markedskræfternes “usynlige” regulering.», «De i bogen diskuterede disintegrationsprocesser får ikke alene personlige konsekvenser i form af marginalisering, meningsløshed og anomi, ikke mindst for den store gruppe af ufaglærte, men får også konsekvenser for fagvebægelsen, dens organisation og legitimitet. Det ville have været frugtbart at afslutte bogen med en diskussion heraf»

Christer Håkanson, [Utbildning & Demokrati](https://journals.oru.se/uod/article/download/678/667) — «En hel del av vad Sennett säger om tendenser i arbetslivet har naturligtvis sagts på andra håll, det är inte lätt att komma med något osagt. Poängen med hans framställning är emellertid kopplingen mellan denna utveckling och dess konsekvenser för relationerna mellan människor och den självuppfattning som är kopplad till dessa.»

Ilkka Pirttilä, [Yhteiskuntapolitiikka](https://www.julkari.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/100618/024pirttila.pdf) — «Se keskittyy kuvaamaan uuden kapitalismin pimeää puolta ja vain sitä. Toivoa paremmasta se ei anna. Siinä ei edes käsitellä – esimerkiksi Beckin, Giddensin ja Lashin – reformistisia ajatuksia refleksiivisistä toimijoista positiivisen työpolitiikan ja elämänpolitiikan mahdollistajina.», «Sennettin aineisto on lähinnä vain Yhdysvalloista ja on käytännössä kirjoitettu 1990-luvun puolivälissä. Nämä seikat rajoittavat tulkintojen osuvuutta suhteessa Suomen ja Euroopan unionin työelämään. Työmarkkinoiden dynamiikka ja työntekijöiden joustava erikoistuminen ja liikkumisen pakko eivät ole – esimerkiksi Suomessa – yhtä vahvoja kuin Yhdysvalloissa.», «Molemmat teokset ovat kiintoisia siksi, että ne haastavat ja virittävät arvottamaan työelämää ja työntekoa.», «Molemmat teokset, esseistiikan ja vaeltavan esityksen turvin, tuottavat kysymyksiä ja hypoteeseja koskien työn moraalia. On syytä jatkaa yhtäällä keskustelua ja toisaalla tehdä, tässä arvioituja esityksiä, tarkempia empiirisiä analyyseja siitä, mitä on hyvä ja paha työ, miten koetaan työtyytyväisyys ja työuupumus ja onko työniloa.»

[REVIEW_IN_MEDIA] 김호기, 연세대 교수·사회학, [Kyunghyang Shinmun](https://www.khan.co.kr/opinion/column/article/201803272102005) — «지난 몇 년간 가장 좋아하고 존경해온 사회이론가는 유태인 출신 사회학자 지그문트 바우만과 미국 사회학자 리처드 세넷이다.», «세넷은 큰 관심을 끌진 못했다. 내가 세넷을 주목하게 된 것은 그의 문제작 <신자유주의와 인간성의 파괴>를 만나면서부터였다.»

[REVIEW_RETELLING] Mehmet Can Çarpar, Doktora öğrencisi, Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Sosyoloji Ana Bilim Dalı, [Abant Kültürel Araştırmalar Dergisi](https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/1081089) — «Eser kapitalizmin dönüşümüne dair birçok argüman bulundurmakla beraber, söz konusu dönüşümlerin gündelik yaşama yansıyan boyutlarını ele alması bakımından oldukça özgün bir katkı niteliği taşır.», «Sennett’in bu çalışması makale boyunca vurgulandığı üzere, kapitalizmin mikro düzeyde nasıl işlediğini, karakteri nasıl dönüştürdüğünü ve kişiler arası iletişimin de doğal olarak nasıl erozyona uğrattığını göstermesi açısından oldukça işlevseldir. Bununla birlikte kendi coğrafya bağlamından olacaktır ki, Sennett’in bazı ifadelerinde çalışmanın büyük ölçüde orta sınıfsal bir pozisyondan yazıldığı, toplumsal cinsiyet ilişkilerini çok hesaba katmadığı ve analizlerinin merkezinde orta sınıf bir erkek olduğu anlaşılmaktadır.», «Bununla birlikte Sennett çalışmasının tüm aşamalarında “yeni” olarak tanımladığı esnek kapitalizmi adeta yerden yere vururken, sanayi kapitalizmini de aynı ölçüde olmasa da bir birim övdüğü görülür. Fakat sosyolojideki dev külliyatlar gösterir ki sanayi kapitalizmi de Sennett’in işaret ettiği karakter aşınması durumunu yaratır, bireyi önce işine daha sonra da kendisine ve çevresine yabancılaştırır.»

Emanuel Ynoub, Alumno de la carrera de Sociología de la Facultad de Humanidades y Cienci as de la Educación de la UNLP, [Cuestiones de Sociologıa](http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/bitstream/handle/10915/13144/4705-7499-1-PB.pdf) — «Ahora comparte con su generación de intelectuales las peculiaridades de ser un escritor que se ocupa más en dar rienda suelta a las palabras, que a explicar la realidad a través de los hechos.»

Luis Marín Segarra, [Recerca, Revista De Pensament I Anàlisi](https://www.e-revistes.uji.es/index.php/recerca/article/download/170/157) — «Y es que el autor observa los suficientes rasgos de semejanza entre ambas esferas para establecer una relación de homología entre ellas. Ahora bien, nada más lejos de Sennett el extender la lógica económica al ámbito de la decisión política al estilo de las teorías elitistas de la democracia», «Y ello porque el autor se distancia por completo de esa lógica económica (hay diferencias fuertes entre el modelo del «egoístaracional», propiodelateoría económica marginalista, y su modelo de productor, consumidor, ciudadano y usuario de servicio público). Su modelo de productor no queda reducido al de quien intercambia trabajo por salario», «La pregunta que se le puede plantear al autor es si el capitalismo en su fase de desarrollo actual es capaz de alcanzar esas metas. El planteamiento de Sennett en esta obra, al tener como objeto elementos de carácter cultural, no entra en el tratamiento de los elementos de carácter económico que subyacen en el nuevo capitalismo.»

Thomas Bissels, Institut für Personalund Organisationsforschung der Universität der Bundeswehr München, [Management Revue](https://sci-hub.se/10.2307/41783145) — «Obwohl Sennetts Betonung der Erwerbstätigkeit für die Identitätsbildung des Menschen nicht unumstritten ist ebt sich sein Buch wohltuend von den Business-Ratgebern zum Umgang mit Flexibilität ab. Dies bedeutet jedoch nicht, dass nicht auch in wissenschaftlichen Kreisen zu oft der Flexibilität das Wort geredet wird, ohne die Vorzüge von Stabilität für (arbeitende) Menschen überhaupt ernsthaft in Erwägung zu ziehen.»

Светлана Юрьевна Барсукова, профессор кафедры экономической социологии ГУ ВШЭ, [Экономическая социология](https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/zhestkost-myagkih-setey-retsenziya-na-knigu-sennet-r-korroziya-haraktera-per-s-angl-v-i-supruna-novosibirsk-fspi-trendy-2004-296-s/pdf) — «Впрочем, не спешите записывать Р. Сеннета в борцы с режимом. Он, скорее, его летописец. На подручном материале личных наблюдений со всеми вытекающими последствиями.», «По строгим канонам социологического исследования судить книгу можно строго ( вопросы о выборке, о репрезентативности наблюдаемых случаев даже не обсуждаются автором). Верующим в единообразие «научного продукта» книгу лучше не трогать, дабы не раздражаться.», «Видящим в социологии пограничье с искусством, где есть место прозрению и стилевой свободе, книга даст повод к размышлению. Судя по всему, автор и не претендовал на большее.»

Gard Binney, [Ecologist](https://www.resurgence.org/download.cgi?isid=1999-12&serial=ecologist#page=47) — «Whether one subscribes to the didactics of Diderot or the simplicities of Adam Smith, it is obvious from recent upheavals in the world market as well as from the revelations of Richard Sennett that the bottom line of the balance sheet is not necessarily the shortest way to the top of the mountain, either that of the Buddha or of mere material beings. In our frenzied pursuit of a global economy we have substituted global pillage, spiritual poverty and a loss of communal commitment for the Utopian dream of a global village.», «The Corrosion of Character should be required reading for all believers in the unmixed blessings of the global market, be they economists, ministers of finance and trade, or the heads of such obsolete institutions as the IMF, World Bank and USAID, with their often selfserving or counter-productive agendas.»

Anne Kovalainen, Swedish School of Economics and Business Administration, Helsinki, Finland, [Acta Sociologica](https://sci-hub.se/10.2307/4201198) — «Rather than writing a detailed study based on the multitude of research evidence on the effects of increasing flexibility and uncertainty at work, Richard Sennett has chosen another way», «Sennett does not dive into post-Fordist debates, however, but rather relies more on a few chosen classics in developing his argument.», «Yet it is an important, if essayistic, contribution to the debate on flexible capitalism», «However, the text lacks solid empirical evidence and references to such works, as Sennett argues on the philosophical and theoretical levels and does not cite empirical evidence to back up his arguments, although he does attach statistical tables as illustrations for some recent economic trends in the USA.», «But Sennett's book also raises questions, which it, arguably, does not discuss at sufficient length or at all. One of the major questions is whether the changed nature of the corporate society and new short-term employment relationships is solely and completely responsible for the 'corrosion of character'. Does work alone create and erode identity? Sennett does not provide us with clear-cut answers based on empirical research.», «Another major question that Sennett's book raises is naturally the question of how novel the effects of the new economy are.», «Sennett devotes little space to the social organization or social consequences of the new economy, although these are integral parts of the everyday lives and decisions made at home and work, where the self is forged and takes on its character.», «Richard Sennett's book is nevertheless very much worth reading, not only because he is clear and precise in the development of his argument, but also because it seems that the formula he has selected, i.e. his essay style, works far better for its purposes than a standard academic study», «If we are to take Sennett's argument seriously, that short-term capitalism threatens to corrode individual character, especially those qualities of character that bind human beings to one another and furnish each of us with a sense of sustainable self, it would be well worth seeking further empirical evidence to back up his arguments.»

[BOOK_OR_AUTHOR_OR_CONCEPT_CRITICISM] Lynn Harland, Associate Professor of Management, University of Nebraska at Omaha, [Personnel Psychology](https://sci-hub.se/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1999.tb00180.x) — «There are a number of positive features of this book. The book is definitely thought-provoking.», «Moreover, it was interesting and educational to refresh my memory about the writings of Adam Smith and to learn more about the work of Michel Foucault.», «He also makes it clear that his dislike of the “new capitalism” does not imply that he is overly fond of the “old days” (where employees worked under oppressively routine conditions within strict hierarchies). It is to his credit that he does not oversimplify the issue in this way.», «With regard to the drawbacks of the book, I found myself becoming skeptical of Sennett’s objectivity about teamwork after reading his», «Shortly after completing the book, 1 made a point of asking my MBA students (who are part-time students with extensive work experience) how they feel about working in teams in comparison to working individually. I was surprised to hear them speak vehemently in support of teamwork.», «The students’ responses made me curious enough to wish that someone would conduct an empirical study testing Sennett’s hypotheses regarding teamwork. (…)  But in all seriousness, I am concerned that Sennett may be significantly overgeneralizing given that his sources were extremely limited in number and nonrandom in selection.», «Overall, I found the book to be interesting and thought-provoking but not particularly convincing.», «However, it is always useful to be reminded that just because a trend is new (e.g., teams and flexibility) does not necessarily mean that it is without problems. Indeed, perhaps the major strength of this book is that it may stimulate empirical research on this important topic. Certainly this would be a welcome addition to the debate»

[REVIEW_NO_ACCESS] Ole Johnny Olsen, [Sosiologisk tidsskrift](https://www.idunn.no/st/2003/02/det_fleksible_mennesket_eller_karakterens_forvitring)

Friedemann Scriba, [Comparativ](https://www.comparativ.net/index.php/v2/article/view/2424)

[REVIEW_FOR_THE_FUTURE] Tom D. Bergman, [Niin & näin](https://netn.fi/sites/www.netn.fi/files/netn024-33.pdf)

Klas Rönnbäck, [Dagensbok](http://dagensbok.com/2001/03/01/richard-sennett-nar-karaktaren-krackelerar/)

Matti Kamppinen, Turun yliopiston uskontotieteen lehtori, [Tieteessä tapahtuu](https://journal.fi/tt/article/download/57311/19342/57490)

Μυρων Ζαχαρακης, είναι μεταπτυχιακός φοιτητής Φιλοσοφίας, [BookPress](https://bookpress.gr/kritikes/koinonia/10243-sennett-richard-pedio-o-elastikopoiimenos-anthropos)

Oğuz Başol, Öğr. Gör., Kırklareli Üniversitesi Lüleburgaz MYO, [Kırklareli Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi](https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/266374)

Ebru Aricioğlu, Arş. Gör., Gazi Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, [Ekonomik Yaklaşım](https://www.bibliomed.org/mnsfulltext/94/94-1395843972.pdf)

Alessandro Paoli, [Jura Gentium](https://www.juragentium.org/books/it/sennett.htm)

Evelyne Perrin, [Les Annales de la recherche urbaine](https://www.persee.fr/doc/aru_0180-930x_2000_num_87_1_2344_t1_0126_0000_3)

Ralph Fevre, School of Social Sciences, Cardiff University, [Work, Employment & Society](https://sci-hub.se/10.1017/s0950017000290508)

Yvonne S. Smith, [Journal of Biblical Integration in Business](https://cbfa-cbar.org/index.php/jbib/article/download/393/394)

[CRIM_FILE_QUALITY] Статистические таблицы поломаны; в самой книге также встречаются ошибки. Таблицы без ошибок, но в плохом качестве представлены в англоязычной версии книги.

[FILE_CORRUPTED][BOOK_FILE_NO_CORRUPTED] Sennett Richard — The Corrosion of Character꞉ The Personal Consequences of Work in the New Capitalism (W. W. Norton & Company, 1998).epub
 -->
1. Сеннетт Ричард — Коррозия характера (ФСПИ «Тренды», 2004).pdf

<a id="Личность-и-работа"></a>
## Личность и работа

<!--- [BOOK_SERIES] Мастера психологии -->
1. [Ильин Евгений Павлович](https://psy.su/psyche/projects/70/) — Работа и личность. Трудоголизм, перфекционизм, лень (Питер, 2011).pdf

<a id="Молодые-рабочие"></a>
## Молодые рабочие

<!--- [ACADEMIC_DEGREE] [Indiana University, CV](https://oneill.indiana.edu/doc/cvs/full-time/silva_jennifer_cv.pdf) — «Ph.D., University of Virginia, Sociology, 2010. Dissertation: “The Hidden Injuries of Risk: Coming of Age in the Midst of Social and Economic Uncertainty.”»

[POSITIVE_OR_NEUTRAL_REVIEW][REVIEW_RETELLING] Augustin Derado, Institut društvenih znanosti Ivo Pilar, Centar Split, [Revija Za Sociologiju](https://sci-hub.se/10.5613/rzs.45.1.4) — «Iako svjedoci američkih specifičnosti, brojni nalazi i perspektive iz te knjige Jennifer M. Silva mogli bi se pokazati prilično važnima i u europskom kon-tekstu»

[REVIEW_RETELLING] Susan Cody-Rydzewski, Ph.D., Associate Professor of Sociology, Georgia Perimeter College, Alpharetta, Georgia, [International Social Science Review](https://digitalcommons.northgeorgia.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1061&context=issr) — «Coming up Short is a well-written and moving book, documenting in a very personal way the micro-level consequences of a changing economy, and ambiguous social norms, ethnic tensions, and continued pressures to achieve the American Dream as an individual.»

Marguerite G. Rosenthal, Emerita, School of Social Work, Salem State University, [The Journal of Sociology & Social Welfare](https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3841&context=jssw) — «Coming Up Short is a brief, but powerful, update of the status, difficulties, behaviors and distresses that characterize the lives of young working class adults.», «Silva is consciously updating the classic sociological studies of Sennet and Cobb’s The Hidden Injuries of Class (1972) and Rubin’s Worlds of Pain (1976).», «Yet the book is slim on policy recommendations that are implied: better schools, greatly increased educational and vocational counseling (in high school and at the community college level), low interest government-sponsored loans, and a return to easier means to declare bankruptcy, among others.», «Silva apparently did not seek responses about experiences with unions or other forms of worker cooperation, although she states that her interviews were semi-structured.», «recent worker protest activities, such as fast food and Wal-Mart workers’ demanding higher wages. One wonders what Silva’s respondents would have to say about these events and whether they have affected their current understanding of their predicaments.», «Coming Up Short is highly recommended for sociologists and social welfare students and academics alike. It informs in telling detail the difficult circumstances and self-perceptions of a significant portion of the American population.»

Andrew King, University of Surrey, [American Journal of Sociology](https://sci-hub.se/10.1086/678203) — «Coming Up Short: Working-class Adulthood in an Age of Uncertaintyis oneof those academic books that is informative, emotionally engaging, and ac-cessible», «I enjoyed reading this book. It will stay in my memory long after itreturns to my bookshelf, although I suspect it will not stay there long.»

[REVIEW_RETELLING] Sarah L. Courteau, The Wilson University, [The Wilson Quarterly](http://archive.wilsonquarterly.com/sites/default/files/articles/129_ComingUp_Autumn13.pdf) — «But it’s hard to come away from her book without hearing, in the stories she tells, a deeper loss and yearn-ing than a strengthened social safety net would remedy, and wondering what the ultimate cost will be to a country that has come to depend on the service of strangers.»

Melanie Simms, University of Leicester, [British Journal of Industrial Relations](https://sci-hub.se/10.1111/BJIR.12067) — «And in this regard, my main criticismof this book is that while many of the issues are experienced by young peoplearound the world, this is a uniquely American story. This undoubtedly comes froma desire to be honest about the voices and experiences of the participants. But theresult is that significant parts of the content may be unfamiliar to readers outsidethe USA.», «It is clear that the author is a skilled sociologist who is able to identify importantpatterns within the huge complexity of social experience.», «What is less evident is her position within thepsychoanalysis literature. She identifies the therapeutic narrative as being both helpfuland problematic, but this is a study informed by sociology rather than psychology.The book’s lack of grounding in that literature is one of its weaknesses.», «Nonetheless, this is a highly engaging book that details the nuance and variety ofthese young people’s lives in an accessible way. The author tells us that some of herparticipants wanted the book to be a voice for young working-class adults, and sheachieves this with considerable sensitivity.»

Helene Smee, Manchester Metropolitan University, [The British Journal of Sociology](https://sci-hub.se/10.1111/1468-4446.12089) — «Silva makes referenceto stocks of economic, social and cultural capital, for example, but these concepts are neitherexplained nor discussed with reference to Bourdieu or cultural class analysis. The book alsodraws extensively on Beck and Giddens but does not touch on their claims that class is dead,or a ‘zombie category’. This is not just a theoretical issue: it would have been important torecognize this precisely because the empirical data so vividly illustrates contemporary socialdivisions and the decline of traditional working-class occupations.», «The book will be of interest to scholars in a wide range of fields: the sociology of work;transitions to adulthood; intimacy and family life; and the sociology of emotions, to name buta few.», «However, a wider audiencewould be interested in the picture of contemporary American life that Silva provides, alongwith the case she makes for the collectivization of risk to ensure that no-one ‘comes upshort’.»

Isabel V. Sawhill, The Brookings Institution, Washington DC, [Work and Occupations](https://sci-hub.se/10.1177/0730888414545447) — «Although the book’s appendixcontains the interview guide used by Silva in her research, the respond-ents are a convenience sample and the findings are qualitative in nature.Anyone looking for statistical evidence on the many issues beingaddressed will be disappointed.», «The strength of the book instead is inthe way it probes the nuances and richness of the stories told to the author by her respondents and the sympathetic and intelligent way in which she interprets the evidence.», «These interpretations are, of course, open to debate.», «Overall, I can highly recommend the book as an empathetic andnuanced reading of the lives of young adults from less privileged back-grounds. It is well researched and well written. Although the author tendsto blame our neoliberal ideology or market-driven politics for leaving toomany people adrift without a safety net, the book is primarily devoted todescribing their lives and their understandings of self rather than to dis-cussing policy measures that might improve their prospects.»

[BOOK_OR_AUTHOR_OR_CONCEPT_CRITICISM] Matthew Cole, Independent Scholar, UK, [Work, employment and society](https://sci-hub.se/10.1177/0950017015572332) — «Despite my political sympathy for the author’s seeming intentions, I found the analysis lacking, especially with regard to historical and economic literature outside the limited vocabulary and references of contemporary liberal American sociology», «Yet only eight out of 27 interview questions have anything to do with her subjects’ actual lived experience of work and class.», «These areas help to explicate what Silva terms the ‘mood economy’, a highly problematic substitute for an actual political economy of class and one that ignores considerable historical research concerning the psyche under capitalism1 in favour of a neologism for emotional neoliberalism», «However, it is unclear if the mood economy is a cause or a symptom of the neoliberal conception of the self, whether it coexists with the ‘real’ economy, and finally what, if anything, is specifically ‘working class’ about it.», «A political economy of affective labour would perhaps offer one way to carve out a similar class-based analysis, since the vast majority of workers who perform this type of work are ‘working class’, ‘proletarian’, ‘precarious’, etc. Unfortunately Silver does not take this approach», «The limitations of her study perhaps stem in part from her research methodology. Silva defines ‘working class’ as ‘having fathers without college degrees’», «This seems almost arbitrary with regard to both the drastic shifts of social and economic class distinctions in recent history and her own findings later in the book – for example that higher education is currently an obscuring, if not irrelevant, reference point for ‘class’.», «I would recommend her work for the lay reader interested in a certain degree of voyeuris-tic insight into the emotional struggle of young proletarians. However, I would caution readers that the seismic generational shift she describes lacks the concrete economic context it deserves.», «Had she contextualized, highlighted and critiqued the conditions that created the generational barrier, her book could have been an important intervention. Regrettably, it comes up short.»

[REVIEW_NO_ACCESS] Peter A. Kindle, [Journal of Baccalaureate Social Work](https://meridian.allenpress.com/jbsw/article-abstract/23/1/241/12363/Coming-Up-Short-Working-Class-Adulthood-in-an-Age)

[Is/Mono]

[NO_SCEDRECO] -->
1. Silva Jennifer M. — Coming Up Short꞉ Working-Class Adulthood in an Age of Uncertainty (Oxford University Press, 2013).pdf

<a id="Невидимая-работа"></a>
## Невидимая работа

<a id="Устные-истории-о-невидимой-работе"></a>
### Устные истории о невидимой работе

<!--- [JOURNALISM_DEGREE] Был журналистом The Atlantic, NY Times и The Wall Street Journal — https://davidzweig.com/about/

[NOTE] Ссылки на источники есть, но на научные исследования — мало.

[INFO] Отзывы в прессе не могут служить источником авторитетности; они, скорее, служат маркером, что книга распиарена — http://www.invisiblesbook.com/press/

[NO_REVIEW] Не нашёл рецензий в реферируемых изданиях на языках, на которые была переведена книга — http://old.davidzweig.com/invisiblesbook/

[ADDITIONAL_READING] Marion Crain — «Invisible Labor. Hidden Work in the Contemporary World»

[NO_PDF][NO_SCEDRECO] -->
1. Zweig David — Invisibles. The Power of Anonymous Work in an Age of Relentless Self-Promotion (Portfolio, 2014).epub

<a id="Неполный-рабочий-день"></a>
## Неполный рабочий день

<!--- [ACADEMIC_DEGREE] Meiksins, [Higher Education Compact of Greater Cleveland](https://highereducationcompact.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/Peter-Meiksins.pdf) — «He is also Director of the University Honors Program and Professor of Sociology at CSU. He received his BA from Columbia University and his MA and Ph.D. from York University in Toronto.»

Whalley, [Chicago Tribune, obituary](https://www.chicagotribune.com/news/ct-xpm-2007-08-18-0708170806-story.html) — «Pete was a professor of sociology at Loyola University for 28 years.»

[NO_SCEDRECO]

[REVIEW_CHECK] 2021-7-4

[POSITIVE_OR_NEUTRAL_REVIEW][REVIEW_RETELLING] Mark Wardell, Pennsylvania State University, [The Journal of Industrial Relations](https://sci-hub.se/10.1111/0022185605047002013) — «Nevertheless, from this book we do know that highly educated and skilled professionals can scale back theirprimary paid working time without sacrificing their professional identities.»

Allison J. Pugh, University of California, Berkeley, [Social Forces](https://sci-hub.se/10.2307/3598217) — «Sometimes Meiksins and Whalley argue so strenuously against the stereotypes of part-time work that they paint a rather surreal world.», «Meiksins and Whalley and perhaps their informants work so hard to demonstrate how voluntary all this "mommy time" is, that their descriptions seem to impoverish its experience.», «Still, the success stories available here make for thrilling reading to students of work and organizations, as we hear of these professionals' winning strategies to challenge normative patterns of overwork in the U.S. While the individualized, customized nature of each of these arrangements is far from a mass movement, Meiksins and Whalley's study is an inspiring portrayal of individual creativity and resistance.»

Amy S. Wharton, Department of Sociology, Washington State University, [Administrative Science Quarterly](http://worklife.wharton.upenn.edu/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/ASQ-review-Allies-or-Enemies.pdf) — «The authors invoke the relevant scholarly literatures on work andfamily throughout the book but do not ground their analysesin any particular theoretical perspective.», «Although academics are not the book's primary audience.Putting Work in Its Place deserves organizational researchers'attention. Those familiar with the work-family literatureshould find the authors' analyses intriguing, especially inthose areas in which they challenge taken-for-granted ideas.», «While Meiksins and Whalley believe they have found truepioneers on the work-family frontier, my view is somewhatmore mixed, in part because of the distinctiveness of theworkers they interviewed. As they acknowledge, even per-forming part-time work, the technical professionals in theirsample were highly paid, having marketable skills in highdemand from employers.», «A more important factor tempering my enthusiasm about thereconfigured work lives portrayed in this book, however, con-cerns the role of gender. The technical professionals Meiksins and Whalley interviewed may have been rewritingthe rules about the workplace, but they were hardly rebels athome. Despite the authors' attempts to show that thewomen they interviewed were atypical in their goals anddesires, gender exerted a powerful force on the patterns thebook describes.», «Thus, while these books are useful for calling attention to changeand what it might look like, they also reveal the intractabilityof the gender order and its role in organizing work and family»

Edward Jeffrey Hill, Brigham Young University, [Journal of Marriage and Family](https://sci-hub.se/10.2307/3600016) — «This is an optimistic book, full of hope that by customizing hours at work without traditionalizing gender roles at home, many can experience a fuller measure of life. And why not?»

Kathleen Gerson, Professor and Chair of Sociology at New York University, [Contexts](https://sci-hub.se/10.1525/ctx.2003.2.3.61) — «Since the study didnot make comparisons with full-time workers, we cannotknow whether the “ customized” option was unavailable toyounger men or simply less appealing.», «It is an irony of their insight-ful study that the lives they illuminate show how firmlyentrenched this assumption remains in the boardrooms ofcorporate America.»

[REVIEW_ONE_PAGE] Kenneth R. Foster, University of Pennsylvania, [IEEE Spectrum](https://sci-hub.se/10.1109/MSPEC.2002.1015449) — «Indeed, the work at times resemblespop sociology more than an academictreatise. But the authors cite scholarlyworks as well, being published authoritieson technological employment issues. Thedepth of their analysis is limited however:their respondents were a self-selectedgroup of volunteers and so hardly repre-sentative of all employees.», «Is the shift to part-time work a “quietrevolution,” as the title promises? Theauthors have not made that case. But theyhave shown us more than a hundred hard-pressed men and women, who have, byand large, made successful adjustments toallow them to manage other obligations»

[REVIEW_PERSONAL_COMMENTS] В окончании рецензии указан Stephen Cass, Editor. Не совсем понял, чего он редактор, и он ли или Фостер является автором рецензии.

Jessica Livingston, Ph.D. student in the English dept. at the University of Florida, [Politics and Culture](https://politicsandculture.org/2010/08/10/the-politics-of-time-and-work-peter-meiksins-and-2/) — «However, it is hard not to just see this option as reserved for upper-middle class white married professionals (the absence of race in their text suggests to me that they are talking about primarily white professionals). The professionals that they interviewed have seen a reduction in their income but they still have good benefits and above average salaries, particularly when combined with the earnings of a spouse. Thus they are “legitimately free to ignore many of the real economic penalties experienced by other part-time workers”», «Early in the book Meiksins and Whalley do situate their study within the larger picture of work.», «While they admit the problems of low-wage contingent work, I would have liked them to engage them more.», «The connections between independent contracting and temporary work, between flexible work arrangements and unstable work schedules, and between the privilege of technical professionals and the lack of privilege of the secretaries, data processors, and janitors who share their offices are important in understanding how work is being redefined.», «While Meiksins and Whalley maintain an optimism throughout the book that their findings do not always seem to support, it is because of this optimism that they are capable of seeing real possibilities for change.»

[BOOK_OR_AUTHOR_OR_CONCEPT_CRITICISM] Janet H. Marler, Assistant Professor School of Business University at Albany, State University of New York, [Industrial & Labor Relations Review](https://sci-hub.se/10.1177/001979390305600212) — «This approach has the strength of treating all respondents' experiences equally, which contributes to the ethnography's richness and scope, but it also has the weakness that the profusion of detail obscures main trends.», «Despite the book's qualitative strengths, it fails to fully describe the subjects' life circumstances.», «Especially wanting is information about those key people who may have influenced the respondents' decisions. For example, in quoting male respondents, the authors frequently omit mentioning the number and age of children, details they provide for women; and there is very little about the life stages of either male or female respondents' spouses.», «The book is also frustratingly devoid of quantitative descriptive data, which is a pity given the sample size, 127 respondents. For example, the initial sample description lacks comparison with national data (perhaps because it would show that this group represents a small proportion of the labor market?) Considering the centrality of household income in supporting these alternative life styles, data on that variable appear disconcertingly late in the book.», «Also, the reader has no idea when these interviews were conducted, although clearly it seems to have been during a business expansion.», «Still, given the vast amount of qualitative data collected, these are minor criticisms.», «The book's best features are the richness of its qualitative data and the insightfulness of its sociologically framed analyses, which are often gently iconoclastic in approach and substance»

Jackie Krasas Rogers, The Pennsylvania State University, [Contemporary Sociology](https://sci-hub.se/10.2307/1556560) — «While the focus on technical workers circumscribes the findings, the occupationally specific nature of this research permits attention to the ways in which the organization of work shapes experiences of, opportunities for, and obstacles to customized work.», «The authors do achieve their stated objective to demonstrate that reduced work need not be constructed as a means to marginalize workers, specifically women workers on a "mommy track," and additional attention to organizational contexts would make that path more visible in the analysis.», «There are a few missed opportunities here, and the reader will long for deeper discussion on a number of points.», «Meiksins and Whalley draw our attention to an important conundrum regarding work and family policies. Although these policies are sorely needed, they generally do not disrupt the status quo either with regard to gender relations or employers' claims on the waking hours of workers», «A limited number of workers temporarily making use of such policies leaves the image of the "ideal worker" intact. Yet, a vision of a workplace constituted largely or solely of customized work schedules is not clearly articulated», «While the section on suggestions is useful for a broad audience of readers, the focus on individualized strategies does not point the way toward institutional change.», «Individuals might find this suggestion helpful, yet it is a precise encapsulation of the larger problem-reduced or nonstandard work is not legitimized in U.S. culture. Keeping reduced hours invisible narrows the transformative power of customized work even among professionals because it does not challenge the "conventional politics of time."», «Finally, a more comprehensive incorporation of the most recent work on a variety of nonstandard employment would further elucidate the contribution of this work, particularly for students who may not be steeped in the literature», «Nevertheless, Putting Work in Its Place changes the landscape of the discussion of nonstandard work even as it remains unclear what paths we might embark on to begin to see full-time work as "a socially produced work load, as arbitrary as any other»

Ruth Woodfield, Department of Sociology, School of Social and Cultural Studies, University of Sussex, [Sociology](https://sci-hub.se/10.1177/003803850663676) — «Meiskins and Whalley’s contri-bution, also based on US data, therefore acts as a perfect complement, comprisinga thoroughgoing, fascinating and unique exploration of the personal accounts ofthose with have ‘customized’ previously long workweeks in order to ‘put work inits place’.», «Equally, however, many workers inthis sector have been identified as actively constructing an occupational culturewhere extremely long workweeks, to the exclusion of outside life, are the norm. Indeed, itmakes it crucial reading for those concerned with employment patterns and thoseinterested in the more specific issue of hi-tech work cultures», «Following this observation, the book does not join The Time Dividein its disquisi-tion on policies that would facilitate greater flexibility within employment.», «Its finalsection comprises a checklist of strategies for readers wishing to customize theirworkweek: ‘find an agreeable manager’, ‘be accessible’, ‘do face work’, ‘work welland be seen to work well’, etc. Although partly designed to boost the target audi-ence, this sits rather uncomfortably with the rest of the book, and, more impor-tantly, tarnishes it with the self-help discourse so clearly countered in The Time Divide.», «In this sense the book’s subtitle, A Quiet Revolution, is something of a mis-nomer. By its own acknowledgement, the findings are generated from an elite groupof comparatively powerful workers, acting ‘only as individuals’. It makes littleattempt to speak to the lives of less well-remunerated, less skilled and less secureworkers. For the possibility of customizing worktime to be available to all, and forgenuinely revolutionary change to take place for relatively privileged workers, morecollective forms of agency and agitation are required.»

[Is/Mono]
-->
1. Meiksins Peter F., Whalley Peter — Putting Work in Its Place꞉ A Quiet Revolution (Cornell University Press, 2002).pdf

<a id="Прекариат"></a>
## Прекариат

<!--- [INFO] Не нашёл информации о рецензентах/научных редакторах книги

[INFO] Критика — https://sci-hub.se/10.1177/0950017012445108 .

[BOOK_SUPPORT] Фонд развития и поддержки искусства «АЙРИС»; музей современного искусства «Гараж» -->
1. [Стэндинг Гай](https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=tJtheUYAAAAJ) — [Прекариат. Новый опасный класс](https://sci-hub.se/10.1177/0950017012445108) (Ад Маргинем Пресс, 2014).pdf

<a id="Российский-прекариат"></a>
### Российский прекариат

<!--- [BOOK_SUPPORT] Российский фонд фундаментальных исследований

[INFO] Не нашёл сведений о научных редакторах/рецензентах. Издание утверждено к печати учёным советом Института социологии, однако это не может служить основанием для повышения категории. -->
1. [Тощенко Жан Терентьевич](https://www.rsuh.ru/who_is_who/detail.php?ID=5383) — Прекариат. От протокласса к новому классу (Наука, 2018).pdf

<a id="Работа-ради-будущего"></a>
## Работа ради будущего

<!--- [INFO] В составе комиссии множество учёных-->
1. Глобальная комиссия по вопросам будущего сферы труда — Работать ради лучшего будущего (Международная организация труда, 2019).pdf

<a id="Работающие-бедные"></a>
## Работающие бедные

<a id="Бургер-флипперы"></a>
### Бургер флипперы

<a id="HC-10"></a>
#### HC

<!--- [ACADEMIC_DEGREE] [Program in Law and Public Affairs, Princeton University, CV](https://lapa.princeton.edu/sites/default/files/faculty_newman_cv.pdf) — «1979 — Ph.D. in Anthropology University of California, Berkeley»

[NO_SCEDRECO]

[REVIEW_CHECK] 2021-7-7

[POSITIVE_OR_NEUTRAL_REVIEW] E. Paul Durrenberger, Pennsylvania State University, [American Anthropologist](https://www.researchgate.net/profile/E-Durrenberger/publication/272593529_No_Shame_in_My_Game_The_Working_Poor_in_the_Inner_CityNo_Shame_in_My_Game_The_Working_Poor_in_the_Inner_City/links/5bc1c5f5299bf1004c5eb354/No-Shame-in-My-Game-The-Working-Poor-in-the-Inner-CityNo-Shame-in-My-Game-The-Working-Poor-in-the-Inner-City.pdf) — «She attended to critiques of her re-search design and managed to organize the waves of data thatpoured into her office into a readable and coherent work of an-thropology. This is a major achievement and an inspiration to allwho would take on the daunting task of understanding complex social and political orders», «She mentions unions and the organized opposition to them only in passing. These do not show up in the ethnographybecause they are not significant to the people Newman was studying», «Newman's sense of political possibility, her pragmatism, pre-vents her from discussing changes that would restructure thesystem of relationships that cause poverty.»

Elaine Waxman, University of Chicago, [Social Service Review](https://sci-hub.se/10.1086/516417) — «Newman and her colleagues, who studied three hundred individuals workingor applying for work in the Harlem fast-food industry over the course of a year,make some important contributions to our woeful lack of knowledge about low-wage work.», «In an era in which we plan to‘‘graduate’’thousands of welfare recipi-ents into self-sufficiency via the very sorts of low-paying opportunities Newmanexamines, her ethnographic research provides a sorely needed dose of realityabout the prospects for success», «Equally timely in the welfare and work debate is Newman’s evidence of theworking poor’s strong attachment to employment and to mainstream Americanvalues about success, even among those still looking for work and those for whomit is unclear that work pays (at least infinancial terms).», «We would like to know more about the role of these jobs in building skills, but,unfortunately, we are stymied by two problems.», «Thefirst is related to Newman’s choice of place — the limited economy in Harlem reduces opportunities for jobmobility — so we cannot be sure if the people we meet stay in these jobs becausethey cannot do anything else or because there is little else for them to do.», «Butthe second obstacle seems to derive from a missed opportunity in Newman’sstudy. By her own account, the industry-average tenure for fast-food employees isless than 6 months, suggesting that even some workers in Harlem depart in rela-tively short order. However, Newman focuses the majority of her ethnography onlong-tenured workers, largely ignoring the‘‘leavers.’’ Where, how, and why theseleavers go (is it in the form of another low-skill job, unemployment, school, or areal step up the economic ladder?) is an important gap in the picture, and thatgap tends to reinforce the image of burgerflipping as a dead end.», «Moreover, thebook’s exclusive focus on those who stay in fast food, while understandable, alsosubtly reinforces our stereotypical notions about the location of low-wage jobs.Low-wage work is a game played everywhere, not just in burger palaces and poorneighborhoods. In fact, low-wage workers make their living alongside high-skill,high-opportunity workers every day in the nation’s hospitals, lawfirms, and cor-porate offices.», «While a greater understanding of the most vulnerable segment isan important contribution, Newman’s narrow focus does not take us much fur-ther toward getting the issue of low-wage work on the national agenda.», «Newman does hint at these broader issues in herfinal chapter, where shemoves from the detailed portraits of workers’lives to a thoughtful, if only explora-tory, discussion of how we might improve the prospects of low-wage workers as awhole.», «Although the brief sketches only provide a suggestion of the is-sues, Newman is right to leave us contemplating how we can open up opportu-nity, both within lower-wage jobs and as a way out of them.»

Edward L. Glaeser, professor of economics, [Harvard Magazine](https://harvardmagazine.com/sites/default/files/html/1999/09/browse.books.html) — «She has written a superb ethnographic study of the employed yet impoverished inhabitants of a modern American ghetto. As a piece of social science, this book is a worthy heir to the great ghetto studies of the past, including The Philadelphia Negro, by W.E.B. DuBois, and Black Metropolis, by St. Clair Drake and Horace R. Cayton.», «The unfortunate aspect of Newman's attempt to merge social science and politics is that some readers may miss the book's major ethnographic contributions because of its political agenda. Indeed, the New York Times review became a political counter-manifesto, slighting Newman's analytical work to challenge her policy presumptions (more about that later).», «Her observations have obvious political ramifications that would have been easier for readers of all political stripes to stomach if she had not felt it necessary to push her policy agenda so strongly. The strength of this book is not its policy analysis, but its research.», «Newman has given us a terrific set of new and important facts about the working residents of Harlem», «but I think the real strength of the book (like the strength of the DuBois or Drake and Cayton works) lies in the number of secondary, and more surprising, insights that spring from its pages», «Newman's depiction of the rich social network that ghetto residents use to get by helps explain why residents stay. (…) Yet these explanations still fall short in many cases, such as the story of the father of one of her subjects, who moved with much of his family to Michigan, found a job as a bookkeeper, but then returned to Harlem, where he was unemployed.», «Newman does not really address the causes and consequences of high rates of single-parent families in disadvantaged neighborhoods. These questions are critical, and have been unresolved since the Moynihan report of more than 30 years ago.», «The book also fails to address employment over the life cycle. To what extent will these workers transition into the nonpoor lower-middle class? To what extent is Burger Barn leading up or leading down?», «But these are not a balanced sample, and don't really give us a true vision of what happens to Burger Barn employees when they hit 40.», «That Newman doesn't nail these topics is no criticism of the book, simply a wish for future work. My only real criticism concerns the policy recommendations at the end of the book.», «Newman's advocacy of place-based programs (such as empowerment zones, which are often contrasted with person-based programs, such as the earned-income tax credit, which she also advocates) is poorly argued and unconnected with the body of the book.», «Place-based programs are usually indirect. They distort the migration decision (i.e. they create incentives that keep people who should find a better life outside the ghetto from doing so), and may in the end do nothing more than raise real-estate values and induce the truly poor to move elsewhere for reasons unrelated to better job prospects. If she had at least considered seriously the costs and benefits of the various proposals that she discusses, I would have been happier.», «Luckily, the explicit policy elements of the book can easily be avoided, and readers can focus on the superb social science.»

[BOOK_OR_AUTHOR_OR_CONCEPT_CRITICISM] Antônio Bosi, Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná, [Horizontes Antropológicos](https://www.scielo.br/j/ha/a/XXDrRsHzNxHVYRyFcZBrCPz) — «Contudo, a promissora trilha aberta por Newman perde força toda vez que ela comemora a insistência de jovens pobres em trabalhar, igualando culturalmente segmentos economicamente desiguais», «Newman não valoriza o fato de que essa ética do trabalho é estruturada a partir de experiências de resistência desses trabalhadores aos empregos disponíveis; nem tampouco que os entrevistados manobram valores desse "ethos" do trabalho, exigidos pelo empregador, fazeno-os parecerem essenciais, definidores de um caráter sobrevivente ao desamparo do Estado.», «Outro aspecto não ressaltado por Newman indica o quão provisório este tipo de emprego é encarado pelos jovens entrevistados. Nenhum deles declarou gostar do que faz e muito menos desejar sua permanência nessa ocupação. Aliás, a descrição da rotina desse tipo de trabalho é marcada pelo tédio, pela repetição e pela absoluta falta de exigência intelectual», «Esta crítica não invalida a instigante pesquisa de Newman sobre essa jovem força de trabalho», «Ao contrário, o rico material levantado no livro tem o mérito de expor e indagar hipóteses sobre o sentido do trabalho na contemporaneidade do capitalismo. Tem mérito também porque problematiza a realidade do mundo do trabalho nos EUA e afirma que as coisas por lá não vão bem.», «Ela faz isso ao estilo dos democratas que tentam voltar ao poder de Estado.»

[REVIEW_SMASHER][CRIM_OFFENSIVE] Heather Mac Donald, [The Public Interest](https://www.nationalaffairs.com/storage/app/uploads/public/58e/1a4/f43/58e1a4f43ec4a106892796.pdf) — «It’s easy to take the liberal academic out of the ivory tower but not the ivory tower out of the liberal academic.», «But the resulting book, No Shame in My Game, reveals instead how staunchly academics cling to their cherished beliefs about American racism and injustice in the face of overwhelming evidence to the contrary.», «So while Newman’s primary focus is on workers, she simultaneously carries on a subterranean argument about those on welfare.», «The only problem with Newman’s stories about the working and nonworking poor is that her subjects contradict them on every page.», «But rather than confirming Newman's “structural” analysis of poverty, the Burger Barn workers insist that a person’s character determines his fate.», «Newman’s supervisors show a distressing tendency to generalize about local residents.», «Newman never considers whether these typically conservative ‘stereotypes’ may be grounded in hard-won experience.», «Newman’s charge that racism keeps Harlem residents out of work also fails the street-smart test.», «Newman seems frustrated by her subjects’ resistance to a victim mentality. She does find would-be workers who blame racism when they don’t get a job, but they are just as quick to deny that racism cripples other people’s lives.», «It doesn’t occur to her that people may use racism as a convenient excuse for their own disappointments, while their observations of the world compel them to a different conclusion when speaking more generally.», «Contrary to Newman’s preposterous notion that American society at large stigmatizes low-wage workers, the only stigma her inner-city burger-flippers face is homegrown. Her subjects receive constant verbal abuse from friends and strangers— ostensibly for taking a low-status job, but in fact for trying to succeed and play by the rules.», «None of this raw ethnic discrimination receives the slightest word of criticism from Newman.», «This is not Newman’s view, who maintains hilariously that having a baby out of wedlock at a young age is a rational choice that can actually help a girl settle down.», «It is a favorite conceit of poverty advocates that the innercity is rife with gnawing hunger and deprivation.», «Despite her best efforts, Newman never provides evidence to the contrary, Far from facing a closed “opportunity structure,” Burger Barn workers inhabit a company fanatically zealous about promoting line-workers to management.», «Liberal academics like Newman would provide a far greater service if they took seriously the behavioral and educational deficiencies of the poor, rather than search futilely for a phantom racism.»

[REVIEW_PERSONAL_COMMENTS] В рецензии Макдональд стандартные консервативные аргументы примата индивидуальных факторов над структурными, якобы человек сам полностью ответственнен за свою судьбу

Mary Pattillo-McCoy, [New Labor Forum](https://sci-hub.se/10.2307/40342893) — «No Shame in My Game is much more timid in its policy recommendation», «The data collected by Newman and her research team are impressive. (…) Newman marshals these data skillfully and sensitive.», «The crux of her own recommendations is that "our energies should be directed at opening up opportunity in the private sectoralbeit with limited, targeted assistance from government agencies" (p. 276, emphasis added). This is the first instance in the book where Newman's argument seems to break with the logic of her data.», «The response to such statements, which eschew certain policy options because of their unfeasibility, is that any serious and potentially effective effort to improve the situation of the poor working or nonworking will have strong opposition. Newman's suggestions, which focus on private-public partnerships and union-management alliances, are likely to have only targeted and narrow benefits», «Yet it is unclear if the private corporations who run the program would expand it to the entire Chicago school system. More importantly, plucking lucky program participants for management jobs does not eliminate the low-wage jobs that will still be filled by their peers and low-skilled parents.», «The other exemplary programs that Newman highlights stress training and mobility within companies from poverty-wage jobs to livingwage jobs. Again, such mobility strategies do not address the continued existence of poverty-wage jobs that someone will have to fill.», «Newman seems reticent to offer solutions that might take substantially more political will, persuasion, and organizing.The bottom line is that many men and women work long, hard hours at jobs that simply do not pay enough, yet Newman skirts the issue of disgracefully low pay by offering solutions that focus on upward mobility. To tackle the central issue of low pay, I have in mind recommendations that follow from points made by Claude Fischer and his colleagues in the book Inequality by Design.», «Focusing only on strategies for upward mobility is an unacceptable resignation to the idea that there has to be a class of people that cannot "afford" an adequate standard of living», «In sum, No Shame in My Game is an extremely important (and eminently readable) book that shows why welfare reform should in some respects be secondary to finding solutions to the problems of the working poor. Still, I wish Newman had put forth proposals that forthrightly tackled the central dilemma of low pay raised by her informants.»

[REVIEW_SMASHER][CRIM_OFFENSIVE] William Epstein, School of Social Work, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, [Labor History](https://sci-hub.se/10.1080/00236560050009941) — «Social science is retiring into journalism, a natural extension of society’s passion for postmodern solipsisms. (…) Katherine iding an entertainment in the costumes of science culturalanthropology’s Ms. Wizard fo r the bemusement of the passive American audience of amateurideologues and volunteer activists, a Baedeker for trips to the downtrodden she accepts the task of thesocial sciences and the Enlightenment’s dictate to create a rational authority for socia policy. In the endshe fail», «Despite the search for tools of activation and despite the pretenses of the socia l sciences to objectiveauthority, Newman produces only a series of case study vignettes that speak far more to he r ownRomantic sense of class than to any reality of life at the bottom of work», «Newman moans through th e first par t ofShameabout he r efforts to be judicious and fair ; then gushesabout the working poor in Harlem; and finally announces a serie s of tepi d policies to raise their incomebut without broad attention to poverty itself», «In spit e of her inattention to th e nonworking poor and the problem that it perpetuate», «The solution of a little bit more sharing Newman’s prescription and the typical gus h of the modernliberal nudges the debate over socia l polic y even further away fro m a consideration of the ver y largepublic expenditures, hundreds of billions, tha t may be needed to achieve a well-integrated, socially andpsychologically successful culture, one tha t provides security and a bi t of comfort for th e loser s in theAmerican lottery.», «The claim to rational authority based upon an author’s revelation of immortal trut h throughidiographic studies is preposterous and eve n perverse in so far as Newman’s ever-hopeful fables creat einsurmountable hurdles fo r needed polic y changes», «Newman offers an emotional plea for a structural socia l policy but she doesnot do so on credible grounds.», «Newman’s books float upo n an important strea m of social nee d bu t they are little more tha n a noonballoon for beleaguered liberalism. He r profoundly personal assessments are anything but science; theyare simply memoirist-reportage, the common crypto-subjective product of cultural anthropology tha tservices the ideological con ̄ icts of social discourse. Newman’s anthropology documented the increas-ingly common emigration of contemporary social science away from its disciplinarian responsibilities tosee k its fortune in politics and policy.», «The very earnestness of Newman’s wor k deflects attention away fro m the subjects bac k onto theauthor’s own lofty sentiments and exquisite ethics, he r deep compassion and her scholarly epiphanies», «Frankly fictional, obviouslypolemical, and sometimes eve n cheaply tendentious, the y mak e no clai m to scientific truth», «Newman’s dramas buil d upon a classical theme: the heroic victory against seemingly insurmountableobstacles such as Frodo’s ordeals in reaching the Crac k of Doom.», «Yet her rhapsodies, lackingthe authoritative methods of credible socia l science, need tempering in modest recognition that they areneither the Long March, one of the numerous schleps to th e Poles, nor the Israelites in the Desert.»

[Gr/HC] -->
1. Newman Katherine S. — No Shame in My Game꞉ The Working Poor in the Inner City (Vintage Books, 1999).pdf

<a id="Свобода-слова-на-работе"></a>
## Свобода слова на работе

<!--- [ACADEMIC_DEGREE] [Personal site, CV](https://brucebarry.files.wordpress.com/2021/02/bruce_barry_cv-jan-2021.pdf) — «Ph.D. (1991), Kenan-Flagler Business School, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. Concentration in Organizational Behavior. Dissertation: A model of dyadic social influence behavior in organizations.»; [Vanderbilt University, Vanderbilt Business School](https://business.vanderbilt.edu/bio/bruce-barry/) — «Professor of Management, Professor of Sociology», «Research Interests/Areas of Expertise — Social issues in management, including ethics, public policy, and workplace rights. And the psychology of interpersonal and group behavior in organizations, including power, influence, negotiation, conflict and justice.»

[CRIM_FEEDBACK_IN_BOOK]

[NO_SCEDRECO]

[REVIEW_CHECK] 2021-7-1

[BOOK_OR_AUTHOR_OR_CONCEPT_CRITICISM] Joan S. M. Meyers, University of California, Davis, [Work and Occupations](https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Joan-Meyers-2/publication/240701599_Book_Review_Barry_B_2007_Speechless_The_Erosion_of_Free_Expression_in_the_American_Workplace_San_Francisco_Berrett-Koehler_280_pp_2795cloth/links/5633d04308ae88cf81ba4f95/Book-Review-Barry-B-2007-Speechless-The-Erosion-of-Free-Expression-in-the-American-Workplace-San-Francisco-Berrett-Koehler-280-pp-2795cloth.pdf) — «Some readers will question Barry’s social democratic assumptions thatowners and managers are indeed the best decision makers in a workplace orthat capitalism and true democracy are not inherently conflictual. Others willfind his First Amendment arguments familiarly limited: A focus on the cre-ationof legal codes such as free speech protections ignores their unequalapplicationin a society stratified by class, ethnicity/race, and gender.», «We know, for instance, that due process in existing law is racialized in its actualpractice and that not only firing but also hiring is deeply gendered as well asracialized. Furthermore, given what Barry calls the current political “tilt,” it’sdifficult to see how his proposed policy changes could be effected.», «Placing Speechlesson a sociology or organizational studies syllabuswould present some challenges. Sociologists would be right to complainabout its lack of engagement with empirical studies of workplace expres-sive activity; business students might be frustrated by its legal focus andsingle chapter on management’s role; and undergraduates are likely tofind the legal detail excessive for a fairly basic message about a lack of workplace rights.», «Despite some repetitiveness, however, Speechless — at times surprisingly humorous and breezy—contains important arguments worthy of scholarly consideration and further sociological expansion»

[REVIEW_NO_ACCESS] Jonelle Roth, [People & Strategy](https://go.gale.com/ps/anonymous?id=GALE|A200909444)

Frank J. Cavico, [Journal of Applied Management and Entrepreneurship](https://nsuworks.nova.edu/hcbe_facarticles/103/)

[Is/Mono]
 -->
1. Barry Bruce — Speechless꞉ The Erosion of Free Expression in the American Workplace (Berrett-Koehler, 2007).pdf

<a id="Свободное-время"></a>
## Свободное время

<!--- [ACADEMIC_DEGREE] [Personal site, CV](https://cpb-us-e1.wpmucdn.com/sites.dartmouth.edu/dist/3/517/files/2020/02/Rose-CV_Feb-2020.pdf) — «2012 — Princeton University, Ph.D., Department of Politics and Program in Political Philosophy»

[POSITIVE_OR_NEUTRAL_REVIEW] Marko Konjović, [Filozofija i društvo](http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/bitstream/id/4022/bitstream_4022.pdf) — «Rose argues forcefully that free time should be regarded as a separate and vital resource or opportunity, alongside money and other goods that figure prominently in theories of distributive justice.», «Providing a universal basic in-come that offers abundant free time to all, however, may not be economically or politically feasible», «Chapter 6, finally, aims to show that free time must be guaranteed to caregivers generally, and specifically (and more controversially) to parents.», «Without offering new arguments, however, Rose endorses the opposing claim that children are public goods», «Free Time is certainly an admirable defense of a neglected issue in political philosophy. Although there is much to agree with, there are some pressing concerns.», «Due to limited space and the density of Rose’s arguments, I shall only mention one substantive and two strategic», «Perhaps the most vexing issue is that Rose focuses throughout the book on the amount of free time citizens have per week. She is mysteriously silent, however, as to why (only) such a way of measuring our free time should be relevant.», «Even if we were provided with an ar-gument to the effect that it is free time per week that matters normatively, two strate-gic worries arise. First, Rose’s approach to liberal egalitarianism is highly ecumenical.», «Adopting such a wide-ranging theoretical framework serves well for Rose’s main end: namely, to establish that citizens have a justice claim to their fair share of free time. Nonetheless, it downplays the important differences within the family of liberal egalitarian theories of distribu-tive justice, especially the diverse stances on the question of responsibility for our choices», «Thus, while a liberal egalitarian might agree with the book’s key claim, she might vehemently disagree with the implications Rose herself develops.», «Furthermore, Rose’s (legitimate) decision to explore some issues rather than others may leave the reader wanting.», «Rose has, after all, opened an important new area of en-quiry for those thinking about distributive justice. So, while there is certainly much more to say on this topic still, I hope that Rose’s book gets the readership it deserves, influences law-makers to reconsider some of the ways in which societies are struc-tured, and helps citizens to receive their fair share of free time (whether per week or during a lifetime)»

[REVIEW_PERSONAL_COMMENTS] В примере Конжовича с Анне и Бекки как может быть известно, что первая проживёт 5 лет, а вторая — 55?

Douglas Bamford, Oxford University Department for Continuing Education, [Res Publica](https://cpb-us-e1.wpmucdn.com/sites.dartmouth.edu/dist/3/517/files/2015/02/Res-Publica-Review-by-Douglas-Bamford_Rose_Free-Time.pdf) — «While Iaccept that children are a special kind of public good for the reasons Rose outlines, Iam still reluctant to concede that this should qualify parents as recipients of specialregard when it comes to their free time», «Therefore, while some will be luckier than others regarding theoptions open to them, it remains controversial to include commuting time as part ofone’s time commitments», «Another strong complicating factor that receives too little attention is that of thehorizons for free time comparisons. Rose tends to focus on free time per week forvery good reasons. However, would the amount of free time one has across one’sadult lifetime not be an equally (if not more) appropriate comparison?», «Rose’s ecumenical approach to liberal distributive justice is a sensible strategy. Her broad net catches all theories and shows that all need to take free time more seriously. However, this does serve to downplay potentially large differences in the way that different theoretical approaches could take account of free time.», «The implications that Rose highlights are generally very appealing and well-argued.», «Free time covers a lot of interesting and important ground very succinctly. Rosehas opened an important new area of enquiry for those developing theories ofdistributive justice; to ensure that people have their fair share of free time. There isstill much more to say on this topic, and I hope both that Rose’s book gets thereadership it deserves,andthat it helps citizens in the future get their fair share offree time.»

Samuel Arnold, Texas Christian University, [The Journal of Politics](https://sci-hub.se/10.1086/695297) — «Chapter 6 defends the idea that parental caregiving shouldbe treated as a necessary activity that deducts from free time.This is somewhat controversial, since parents typically chooseto have children. Shouldn’t they therefore be held respon-sible for the free-time-reducing consequences of that choice?», «Rose might have pushed her analysis a bit further here.Overwork, relative to what’s objectively necessary for basic needs satisfaction, has multiple causes, only some of whichare due to employment practices.», «In sum, Free Timeis an excellent and highly persuasivebook. Lucidly written, philosophically rich, and rigorouslyargued, it should become an essential point of reference forfuture work on leisure and distributive justice.»

Eric Rakowski, University of California at Berkeley, [Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews](https://ndpr.nd.edu/reviews/free-time/) — «Her specific concern is free time, defined as "the time beyond that which it is objectively necessary for one to spend to meet one's own basic needs, or the basic needs of one's dependents, whether with necessary paid work, household labor, or personal care."», « She further attempts, less persuasively in my view, to draw out the implications of assigning independent importance to the distribution of free time in regulating work hours or assisting providers of dependent care.», «To be sure, a lot depends on issues that Rose flags but does not take a firm stand on, such as whether employers should be permitted to pay workers more if they labor overtime or at inconvenient hours, or on whether people should be allowed to work longer or earn above a certain amount if that pressures others to toil more than is essential to meet their basic needs.», «And a tremendous amount turns on tax and government spending policy, which Rose does not address.», «Nonetheless, for all of its commendable analytic precision, an undercurrent of what some will see as anti-liberal disapproval of economic or professional striving runs through the book and shapes its account of what justice requires.», «One might also feel unease about Rose's motivating example, which seems to assume that workers are not responsible for where they live, which skills they have developed, or which jobs they accept.», «This may well be true, but so far as I can see neither Rose nor any other liberal egalitarian can solve the problem. Some people cannot be leveled up fully at acceptable, or any, cost.», «Rose says that it is beyond the scope of her book to say when these concerns are legitimate. I found the omission puzzling.», «Rose further maintains that those who care for children, the elderly, or the disabled free of charge should be compensated, because they perform a public service. The time they devote to this task reduces their free time, which a just society must make up to them in some way. I found myself unconvinced by Rose's brisk defense of this claim.», «A great many issues go unexplored here, such as what portion of the cost of raising children is properly borne by the community if most of the benefits redound to parents, or why the benefits that children confer on others when they are grown should be paid for by other adults when they are minors instead of by those (and only those) who receive those benefits later, or why a ready supply of working-age would-be immigrants does not transform childbearing and childrearing from a public service into something more personal», «Although she does not name a number, several of her examples suggest that she thinks that 56 hours per week, or on average 8 hours a day, is roughly what justice requires in the United States today.», «How this principle might be applied to students who are preparing to become employees or employees who are studying on the side to get ahead, let alone assistant professors of philosophy seeking tenure, is a mystery. If those who chose to use their free time to excel were denied advancement on the basis of their greater acquired ability, our world would look very different -poorer, less exhilarating, less excellent, if in some ways more equal.»

[REVIEW_PERSONAL_COMMENTS] Последние 3 предложения Раковски похожи на подмену понятий. Роуз говорит о запрете работы, а не занятий чем-то полезным и связанным со своей профессией в свободное время. Это вещи не тождественные, а порой и прямо противоположные.

[BOOK_OR_AUTHOR_OR_CONCEPT_CRITICISM] Alex Sager, Portland State University, [Ethics](https://philarchive.org/archive/SAGRJL) — «Free Time is an admirable defense of a neglected cause. Nonetheless, it has a number of significant limitations. First, its arguments are unlikely to persuade people not committed to liberal egalitarian proceduralism.», «Rose’s discussion of Gowan v. Maryland (1961) reveals some of the limitations of her account.», «Rose defends the thirdpurpose, coordination, andignores theperfectionist and communitarian purposes(culture and community, respectively). In doing so, she turns her back on leisure’sphilosophical heritage.», «The neglect of perfectionist and communi-tarian arguments leaves a significant gap in Rose’s theory. Her theory is ill-suitedfor criticizing social norms that demand long working hours despite exponentialgains in productivity», «It also provides little guidance for how governments should use finite public funds insupporting and creating infrastructure so that people can fruit fully make use of their free time», «Second, Free Time focuses almost exclusively on the United States, missing the opportunity to turn to other countries as models and to explore how freetime is influenced by cross-border connections. For example, workers in France, Germany, the Netherlands, Norway, and Switzerland work far fewer hours per year than US workers», «While it is probably necessary to stipulate a clear distinction between timespent meeting basic needs and free time for the purposes of her theory, the re-ality is more nuanced.», «It isnot primarily the asymmetry in the amount of free time (however this is ultimatelyconceived) that is of moral interest. Rather, it is the fact that many people are coerced by employers and constrained by social conditions to live much of their livesunder compulsion.», «A gender-based analysis would not only show that women perform more care work than men but also morally assess the mechanisms that explain why this difference persists. A more ambitious analysis would analyze how class, gender, race, and disability intersect in ways that are not captured by focusing on individuals’ access to free time.», «Despite these limitations,Free Timeis a model of Rawlsian political philoso-phy: precise, rigorous, closely argued, and empirically informed.», «Rose’s case for the importance of free time for justice is compelling. She has done us a servicein reviving free time as a topic for liberal egalitarianism.»

[Is/Mono]

[ADDITIONAL_READING] Robert E. Goodin, James Mahmud Rice, Antti Parpo, Lina Eriksson — «Discretionary time: a new measure of freedom»

Robert Skidelsky, Edward Skidelsky — «How Much is Enough? Money and the Good Life»

Anthony James Veal — «Whatever Happened To The Leisure Society?»

Benjamin Kline Hunnicutt — «Free time: the forgotten American Dream»

Douglas Bamford — «Rethinking Taxation — An Introduction to Hourly Averaging»

Карл Оноре — «Без суеты. Как перестать спешить и начать жить»

Carl Honore — «In Praise of Slowness: Challenging the Cult of Speed»

Jeremy Rifkin — «Time Wars: The Primary Conflict in Human History»

Craig Lambert — «Shadow Work: The Unpaid, Unseen Jobs That Fill Your Day»

Arlie Russell Hochschild — The Time Bind: When Work Becomes Home and Home Becomes Work

[NO_SCEDRECO] -->
1. Rose Julie L. — Free Time (Princeton University Press, 2016).pdf
<!--- [ACADEMIC_DEGREE] [Rutgers University Libraries](https://rucore.libraries.rutgers.edu/rutgers-lib/34059/PDF/1/) — «A dissertation submitted to the Graduate School-New Brunswick Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Graduate Program in Political Science»

[POSITIVE_OR_NEUTRAL_REVIEW] Nancy S. Love, Appalachian State University, [Perspectives on Politics](https://sci-hub.se/10.1017/S1537592715001668) — «Decolonizing Timeprovides new insights on the politicsof time under late capitalism. Shippen’s sophisticatedinterpretations of prominent theorists are written in anengaging style that is accessible to experts and nonexpertsalike. Since reading this book, I am thinking differentlyabout time and, as a result, making changes in how I usemy time.», «This brings me to several lingering questions that suggest topics for further research. First, Shippen focuseson the need to decolonize time and yet, as she recognizes, those with the greatest need have the least time to organize this fight.», «I think she intends to offer far more, and hence my second question», «Third and closely related, Shippen recognizes that“mortality is the great equalizer of life time insofar asno one knows the exact length of his or her life” (p. 33).», «However, and this is more than a technicality, Marx cal-culates the exchange value of commodities in terms ofthe socially necessary labor time required to produce them.»

Marcelo Hoffman, Independent scholar, Indianapolis, [New Political Science](https://sci-hub.se/10.1080/07393148.2016.1189190) — «Nichole Marie shippen sets out to achieve two broad and interrelated objectives in this book. The first is to articulate a critique of the individualized ways of coping with time constraints under advanced capitalism. The second is to draw from an array of sources in political theory to appeal to an alternative experience of time centered on a resuscitation and careful adaptation of Aristotle’s conception of leisure as a component of the good life. shippen realizes both of these core objec-tives but she tends to frame important elements of her argument in unfortunately narrow terms.», « The theoretical breadth of shippen’s book is certainly impressive, as Nancy Hartsock rightly points out in her endorsement.», «While shippen gains a useful degree of cohesiveness from this focus, it is disappointing that she does not even mention some prominent thinkers outside of these traditions whose widely recognized reflections on time use would seem to warrant at least a passing reference.», «More substantively, shippen invokes conceptual oppositions, if not dichotomies, that may raise eyebrows among theorists rooted in more contemporary traditions. she opposes the needs of capital to the needs of human beings, almost as if she falls back on an anthropological subject of needs, in spite of her recurrent emphasis on the historical variability of needs and repeated use of the term itself in quotation marks. shippen also frames her entire argument in an unabashedly teleological perspective. indeed, the true tragedy of time loss for shippen consists in a denial of possibilities for human development, rather than in any purely quantitative dimension.», «Given her acknowledgement of the sheer difficulties of inaugurating another politics of time, it is perhaps unsurprising that the tone and tenor of shippen’s argument seem exceedingly cau-tious at times.», «In other words, if time is to be decolonized, it seems that the path to decolonization for shippen is through existing institutional matrices, rather than through revolution and revolt. Curiously, she omits any discussion of how the latter might reconfigure everyday experiences of time constraints and alter institutional practices. Regrettably, one gets the impression that Shippen has written off histories of the temporal implications of revolts and revolutions in a text animated by ‘the fight for time’ (p. xi) from beginning to end.», «Notwithstanding such limitations in the framing and development of her argument, shippen offers a deeply thoughtful and provocative engagement not only with the timely matter of time constraints under advanced capitalism, but also with the altogether vexing matter how to move beyond these constraints so as to secure another experience of time.»

[BOOK_OR_AUTHOR_OR_CONCEPT_CRITICISM] Mara Marin, Centre for Ethics, University of Toronto, [Political Theory](https://sci-hub.se/10.1177/0090591716688265) — «I find the analysis of the book refreshing on a number of levels, perhaps most notably because it discusses an urgent social problem with the theoreti-cal tools of a wide array of intellectual traditions and disciplines. Decolonizing Time is informed not only by classical thinkers like Aristotle and Marx as well as Frankfurt School critical theorists, but also by contemporary liberal normative theorists and feminist thinkers.», «However, I find the basic assumption of the book—that work is antitheti-cal to freedom as self-development—problematic for two sets of reasons. The first has to do with the reasons we have to preserve the connection between work and freedom. The second has to do with its implications for the politics of care and housework.», «By failing to take these reasons into consideration, the assumption behind Shippen’s argument deprives her theory of the ability to make critical judg-ments about the quality of the work itself, rather than simply about the need for time away from work. Rather than suggesting ways to transform the organiza-tion of labor and the social relations it creates, the book recommends legal limits to time spent in productive activity in the form of paid family and sick leave, paid vacation, or basic income.», «Moreover, this approach limits the author’s ability to address even her concern with the quantity of time outside work. If the tendency to take time away from workers is engrained in capitalism’s DNA, as Shippen argues in chapter 2, then there is an argument to be made that legal protections alone will not be enough to withstand the economic forces that pull in the opposite direction, because over time they will be eroded. A more radical transforma-tion of the organization of work is needed even for limiting time in production.», «This assumption that work is the opposite of freedom is particularly sur-prising given that Shippen reconstructs the idea of alienation in exactly the terms I suggested above», «Secondly, framing the discussion in terms of these two related distinctions has problematic implications for our understanding of housework and care work. One of these problematic implications is that housework comes close to being cast as leisure. If whatever is not work, that is, employment, is leisure, then housework (at least in one’s own house) is leisure.», «This direction of the argument is particularly surprising given the attention Shippen gives throughout the book to the feminist arguments that housework is work that deserves recognition, work whose distribution is a matter of justice.», «Here the author speaks of housework as drudgery and casts the problem with the gender division of labor as one of the distribution of repetitive, boring, meaningless work, thus falling in the other extreme. Not only does this rein-force ideas about housework that contribute to its devaluation.», «Decolonizing Time. Work, Leisure, and Freedom is nevertheless an important and ambitious book. By showing the importance of a political theory of time rooted in political economy, it breaks new ground in political theory. It should start a much-needed conversation about our current condition.»

[Is/Mono]

[ADDITIONAL_READING] S. M. Amadae — «Prisoners of Reason. Game Theory and Neoliberal Political Economy»

Mara Marin — «Connected by Commitment: Oppression and Our Responsibility to Undermine It»

Heinrich Popitz — «Phenomena of Power. Authority, Domination, and Violence»

Hartmut Rosa, William E. Scheuerman — «High-Speed Society: Social Acceleration, Power, and Modernity»

Hartmut Rosa — «Social Acceleration: A New Theory of Modernity»

Jonathan Martineau — «Time, Capitalism and Alienation: A Socio-Historical Inquiry into the Making of Modern Time»

Robert Colvile — «The great acceleration: how the world is getting faster, faster»

Jonathan Crary — «24/7: Late Capitalism and the Ends of Sleep»

James Gleick — «Faster: The Acceleration of Just About Everything»

S. M. Amadae — «Prisoners of Reason. Game Theory and Neoliberal Political Economy»

[BOOK_SERIES] Critical Political Theory and Radical Practice

[NO_SCEDRECO] -->
1. Shippen Nichole Marie — Decolonizing Time꞉ Work, Leisure and Freedom (Palgrave Macmillan, 2014).pdf

<a id="Необходимость-сокращения-рабочего-времени"></a>
### Необходимость сокращения рабочего времени

<!--- [ACADEMIC_DEGREE_EDITOR] [Университет Лобачевского](http://www.iee.unn.ru/kafedry/kafedra-ekonomicheskoj-teorii-i-metodologii/zolotov-aleksandr-vladimirovich/) — «доктор экономических наук», «В 1995 году была защищена докторская диссертация. В 1998 году ему было присвоено ученое звание профессора по кафедре экономической теории.»

[ACADEMIC_DEGREE_REVIEWERS] Казённов Александр Сергеевич, [Русская христианская гуманитарная академия](https://rhga.ru/science/conferences/rusm/participants/kazenov.php) — «доктор философских наук»

Мазур Олег Анатольевич, [Невиномысский институт экономики, управления и права](http://www.nieup.ru/institut/empl/&empl_id=&empl_id=5) — «В 2013 году защитил диссертацию на соискание степени доктора экономических наук»

[ACADEMIC_DEGREE] Все авторы — кандидаты экономических наук

[Kr/MCol]

[POSITIVE_OR_NEUTRAL_REVIEW] Волович Василий Николаевич, [Проблемы современной экономики](https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/retsenziya-na-kollektivnuyu-monografiyu-novyy-podhod-k-issledovaniyu-sokrascheniya-rabochego-dnya-kak-osnovanie-sovremennogo/pdf) — «Полученный результат дает возможность установить среднюю продолжительность рабочего дня (рабочей смены) в производстве: путем деления количества часов, отработанных за год в среднем одним занятым, на число занятых.» (*прим. авт. — рецензент что-то не то делит*), «Таким образом, авторы успешно решают эту крупную теоретическую проблему, нерешенность которой мешала развертыванию масштабных экономических исследований динамики рабочего дня», «Указанным теоретическим достижением авторы не ограничились. В книге раскрыты тенденции изменения продолжительности всех периодов трудовой активности работников, начиная с рабочего дня и заканчивая трудовым стажем.», «Авторы как будто бы избегают использования показателей денежных затрат на эти цели, без чего, на самом деле, картина остается неполной.», «Сам масштаб решаемой в исследовании проблемы предопределяет наличие в нем тех аспектов, которые выиграли бы от более обстоятельного рассмотрения. Так, например, при анализе динамики рабочего дня используются данные лишь нескольких, хотя и наиболее крупных экономически развитых стран.», «Авторы упоминают о том, что введение 6-часового рабочего дня возможно как за счет экономии труда на основе повышения его производительности, так и за счет сокращения безработицы, но не приводят расчетов влияния последнего фактора.», «При всей их значимости, эти недостатки не отменяют главного: сделанного авторами вполне достаточно для того, чтобы доказать обоснованность и перспективность предложенного в монографии нового подхода к решению крупной проблемы экономической науки»

[ADDITIONAL_READING] Ельмеев Василий Яковлевич — «Социальная экономия труда»
-->
1. [Золотов Александр Владимирович](http://www.iee.unn.ru/kafedry/kafedra-ekonomicheskoj-teorii-i-metodologii/zolotov-aleksandr-vladimirovich/) (под редакцией) — Сокращение рабочего дня как основание современного экономического развития (СПбПУ Петра Великого, 2016).pdf

<a id="Социология-работы"></a>
## Социология работы

<!--- [ACADEMIC_DEGREE] [University of Arizona, CV](https://sociology.arizona.edu/sites/sociology.arizona.edu/files/sallaz_vita_Feb19.pdf) — «PhD University of California-Berkeley, Sociology, 2005.», [University of Arizona](https://sociology.arizona.edu/people/jeff-sallaz) — «Jeff Sallaz's interests lie at the crossroads of the sociology of work, economic sociology, and social theory. He is an ethnographer, which means he studies people in real time and space, often by living and working among them.»

[Is/Mono]

[POSITIVE_OR_NEUTRAL_REVIEW][REVIEW_RETELLING] Stephen J. Frenkel, University of New South Wales, Australia, [Organization Studies](https://sci-hub.se/10.1177/0170840613492630) — «This perhaps accounts for a predominant focus on labour markets rather than on labour processes. This approach is a welcome addition to the sociology of work literature which has been more concerned with the latter», «Labor, Economy, and Society is a timely contribution highlighting how an economic sociology approach can assist in understanding the social processes implicated in the historical evolution and contemporary dynamics of wage work.», «The book does have some weak-nesses. Some of Sallaz’s categories and analysis add little to ongoing debates – for example, on control (chapter 6) and worker collectivism (chapter 7) – but more fundamentally, the book has three limitations. First, neglect of the finance sector, a part of the US economy whose adverse effects on its citizens and those of other countries cannot be overstated. Second, labour in the digital economy receives too little attention. And third, while the economic sociology perspective challenges neo-classical economics assumptions, this is something of a straw man. More relevant are comparisons of theory and findings from the new behavioural economics, organizational behaviour and organiza-tion theory, all of which have important things to say about the topics covered in the book», «These limitations aside, Labor, Economy, and Society is an accessible and thought-provoking synthesis of ideas and findings in economic sociology.»

[REVIEW_RETELLING] Daniel Tope, Department of Sociology, Florida State University, Tallahassee, [Work and Occupations](https://sci-hub.se/10.1177/0730888414534822) — «Indeed, the book is sosweeping that at times, I thought that it would be stronger if it didnot sacrifice so much depth for breadth. For instance, much morecould be said about the roots and implications of union decline.On the other hand, it is a very appropriate and accessible introductionto economic sociology—one that both graduate and undergraduatestudents will no doubt appreciate»

[ADDITIONAL_READING] Damon Golsorkhi, David Courpasson, Jeffrey Sallaz, Michael Lounsbury — «Rethinking Power in Organizations, Institutions, and Markets»

Andrea Veltman — Meaningful work

[NO_PDF][NO_SCEDRECO] -->
1. Sallaz Jeffrey J. — Labour, Economy and Society (Polity Press, 2013).pdf

<a id="Техно-тейлоризм"></a>
## Техно-тейлоризм

<!--- [JOURNALISM_DEGREE] [BookBrowse](https://www.bookbrowse.com/biographies/index.cfm/author_number/3255/emily-guendelsberger)

[NO_SCEDRECO][CRIM_NO_REFS]

[REVIEW_CHECK] 2021-6-25

[POSITIVE_OR_NEUTRAL_REVIEW] Lawrence M. Eppard, Shippensburg University, [Sociation](https://sociation.ncsociologyassoc.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/bookreview_eppard_2019.pdf) — «In On the Clock, Guendelsberger provides an excellent description of the day-to-day work experiences of those Americans who must settle for low-wage jobs today.», «Guendelsberger aims to help readers feel what low-wage work is like in America today, and this is, in fact,the strength of the book due to its meticulous details.», «On the Clock should encourage readers to rethink the future of work for all Americans, but particularly those in jobs like the ones detailed here, which are driving the American precariat even further into the weeds.», «After reading Guendelsberger’s excellent book, it becomes clear that such actions are also social and political necessities if we wish to rebuild social bonds in our communities and heal our ailing democracy.»

[REVIEW_IN_MEDIA] Anna Krijger, [NRC Handelsblad](https://www.nrc.nl/nieuws/2019/11/26/de-nieuwe-loonslaaf-staat-altijd-aan-a3981624) — «Er valt veel te griezelen in On the Clock, maar Guendelsberger, die onder meer werkte voor de satirische website The Onion, weet het toch geestig op te schrijven. En ze is scherp»

[N/JMas]

[NO_PDF] -->
1. Guendelsberger Emily — On the Clock. What Low-Wage Work Did to Me and How It Drives America Insane (Little, Brown and Company, 2019).epub

<a id="Труд"></a>
## Труд

<a id="Организация-труда"></a>
### Организация труда

<a id="Организация-коллективного-творческого-труда"></a>
#### Организация коллективного творческого труда

<!--- [BOOK_SERIES] В мире науки и техники -->
1. [Матейко Александр](https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00085006.2000.11092267) — Условия творческого труда (Мир, 1970).djvu

<a id="Организация-рабочего-труда"></a>
#### Организация рабочего труда

<!--- [INFO] Гастев, по всей видимости, не имел учёных степеней/званий. В категорию «Для профессионалов» его.

[NO_OCR] -->
1. [Гастев Алексей Капитонович](https://economicus.ru/cgi-ise/gallery/frame_rightn.pl?type=ru&links=./ru/gastev/biogr/gastev_b1.txt&img=brief.gif&name=gastev) — Как надо работать. Практическое введение в науку организации труда (Экономика, 1972).pdf

<a id="Отчуждение-труда"></a>
### Отчуждение труда

<!--- [INFO] Сам Бахитов — кандидат исторических наук. В рецензентах у книги 3 доктора философских наук.

[BOOK_CITATIONS] Цитата: «Но главное тут В. Р. Соловьёв уловил — монетизация общественных отношений в условиях рыночного общества потребления неизбежно ведёт к деградации морали (…) Тебе говорят, что, допустим, гомосексуализм — это нормально. И ты уже вроде как с этим согласился, чисто в силу привычки. Но есть и другой рынок! Теперь это рынок педофилии. (…) В условиях, когда законы против геев приняты почти в 80 странах, Байден и другие высокопоставленные представители Белого дома провели ряд встреч». Вероятно, категория «использовать с ограничениями».

[ADDITIONAL_READING] Melissa Gregg — “Work’s Intimacy”

[NO_OCR] -->
1. [Бахитов Станислав Борисович](http://wp.surgpu.ru/teacher/160/) — Капиталистическое отчуждение труда и кризис современной цивилизации (Алетейя, 2018).pdf

<a id="Стимулирование-труда"></a>
### Стимулирование труда

<!--- [ACADEMIC_DEGREE] [Белорусский государственный университет физической культуры](https://www.sportedu.by/dodonov-oleg-vladimirovich/) — «02.2016 – переаттестован в научной степени кандидата экономических наук по спец. экономика и управление народным хозяйством (специализация «Экономика труда»); ГНУ «Научно-исследовательский экономический институт Министерства экономики Республики Беларусь».

[ACADEMIC_DEGREE_REVIEWERS] Лукьянченко Наталья Дмитриевна, [Донецкий национальный университет](https://donnu.ru/ec/pmlec/lukyyanchenko-natalyya-dmitrievna) — доктор экономических наук

Колбачёв Евгений Борисович, [Диссернет](https://rosvuz.dissernet.org/person/55500) — доктор экономических наук

[Kr/Mono]

[ADDITIONAL_READING] Баймурзина Гузель Римовна, Валиахметов Рим Марсович, Колосова Риорита Пантелеймоновна — «Реализация принципов концепции достойного труда в России: региональный аспект»

[NO_REVIEW] -->
1. [Додонов Олег Владимирович](https://www.psu.by/universitet/personalii/248-personal-d/9298-dodonov-oleg-vladimirovich#biografiya) — Психология стимулирования труда (Вставай Донбасс, 2016).pdf

<a id="Устные-истории-о-работе"></a>
## Устные истории о работе

<!--- [JOURNALISM_DEGREE] «Terkel’s Pulitzer Prize-winning The Good War (1984)» — https://www.britannica.com/biography/Studs-Terkel

[POSITIVE_OR_NEUTRAL_REVIEW] Leon Fink, University of Illinois at Chicago — https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.995.7840&rep=rep1&type=pdf — «Studs Terkel’s Working: People Talk about What They Do All Day and HowThey Feel About What They Do has attained something of an iconic statussince its original publication in 1974.», «Of course, setting Working’s author in the context of his times hardlyexhausts the value of the work itself. The interviews remain to this day aninvaluable, and unpredictable, repository of descriptions of work environmentsand the thoughts of those who occupied them», «Yet, with the possible exception of Barbara Ehrenreich (2001, 2008), no otherwriter has succeeded in placing the voices of working Americans at the centreof compelling, popular expositions of the national mood.»

[REVIEW_LONG][REVIEW_HIGH_ERUDITION] Dorothy Deering — https://sci-hub.se/https://www.jstor.org/stable/27796563 — «Sociologists have complained that Terkel has not followed ap proved sampling procedures and therefore that Terkel' s approach is impressionistic rather than scientific. Who could duplicate his results? they ask. Oral historians have joined the sociologists in faulting the book for its lack of analysis and explanation. In dismay they wail, "Terkel allows himself the freedom of a novelist in selecting material." Precisely. Terkel makes no claims to have written a scientific sociological or historical study. His claim is far greater. He has enabled people to express themselves in their unique humanity.», «Terkel's work gains enormously in the integrity we can see it grants the worker, for it lacks any hint of the condescending tone that pervades Lasson's book», « As egalitarian history these interviews confirm the actual and potential presence of a self-conscious and articulate work-force (still largely unrecognized and untapped) that has waited for and found its historian in Studs Terkel.»

Gus Tyler, Assistant President International Ladies' Garment Workers' Union, New York, 1975 — https://sci-hub.se/10.2307/2521464 — «Terkel allows wide latitude to his subjects. They become people first and "workers" second. Through their eyes-not Terkel's-the reader is allowed to peek at worlds he has never seen or even been aware of.», « Despite Terkel's obvious dedication to objectivity (let them say it like it is), the collection may not be as unbiased as the author himself wishes. A piece of Terkel enters the work when he makes his decisions of whom to interview. The silent ones make poor copy; the articulate ones with strong minds are more likely to grab the reader», «Terkel hints at his own bias in the opening lines of his introduction», « In all, "working"-the thing and the book-is many-sided, many-sorrowed, and many-splendored»

Anthony G. Porreca, University of Tennessee — https://sci-hub.se/10.1177/074171367402500107 — «The frustrations and unhappinesses that exist among many workersare the most astonishing, if not disturbing, content found in the book.», «This broad-based approachto workers’ attitudes toward work is more meaningful than a basic re-port of worker attitudes in isolated occupations. The commonalities thatexist among workers in America are the key factors that make Workinga valuable adult education resource.», «The timely contribution of the book is significant, for it recordsAmerican workers’ view of their jobs as a chore, as a daily humiliation,and as an occasional joy. Perhaps this book will initiate a serious searchfor improved working and living conditions, which, of course, must beinitiated within ourselves.»

Berenice M. Fisher, New York University — https://sci-hub.se/https://www.jstor.org/stable/367849 — «Working, has already received a good deal of attention, in part due to the indictment of our vocational (and social) life it seems to imply. Yet, the book's message is far from unambiguous. The over one-hundred interview statements are filled with complaints about work-its boredom, its physical pain, its degradation-but the range and density of the material is great enough to support a wide variety of theories about the meaning of work.»

[BOOK_OR_AUTHOR_OR_CONCEPT_CRITICISM] Lucie Kučerová (возможно — https://www.slu.cz/fpf/cz/ustav-cizich-jazyku/lide/lucie-kucerova/ ), 2011 — https://journals.muni.cz/discourse-and-interaction/article/download/6964/8507 — «As illustrated on several examples from Hard Times: An Oral History of the Great Depression, these procedures signifi cantly altered the form of the original utterances of the interviewees, which prompts the question of who the author of the texts really is.», «The comparison of the original interview transcripts and their edited versions reveals that the interviewees’ utterances were at places altered to such an extent that it becomes questionable who the author of the utterances really is.», «He is not only appreciated for having let the voices of numerous “etceteras” (Terkel 2007: XV) be heard, but also for his talent to make people open up and talk about things they had never talked about or feelings they never knew they felt.», «The biggest difference can be seen between Dorothe’s interview, which was shortened almost 10.5 times, and the interview with Frank and Rome Hentges, where the UT is only 2.5 times shorter than the ET.», «Such cuts obviously infl uenced not only the way the speaker seems to express herself (less hesitation and uncertainty, shorter sentences)», «also obtain a text in which any given passage might have been reorganized or re-sequenced in a way entirely dependent on Studs Terkel’s idea of the form that the text should have», «As example (4) demonstrates, however, Studs Terkel makes changes even in cases where no correction was necessary», «Since Terkel’s books are generally regarded as containing the voices of hundreds of Americans, the paper aimed at drawing attention to the fact that the interviewees’ utterances underwent considerable alterations which were motivated by Terkel’s attempt to offer something very specifi c to his readership.»

[ADDITIONAL_READING] Сидорина Татьяна Юрьевна — «Жизнь без труда или труд во спасение?»

Anderson Elizabeth — «Private Government: How Employers Rule Our Lives (and Why We Don’t Talk about It)»

Stanley Aronovitz — «False Promises»

Michèle Lamont — The Dignity of Working Men: Morality and the Boundaries of Race, Class, and Immigration

[BOOK_ABBREVIATED_TRANSLATION]

[NO_SCEDRECO] -->
1. [Стадс Теркел](https://www.britannica.com/biography/Studs-Terkel) — Работа. Люди рассказывают о своей каждодневной работе и о том, как они к этой работе относятся (с сокращениями) (Прогресс, 1978).pdf

<a id="Рациональность"></a>
# Рациональность

<a id="Иррациональность"></a>
## Иррациональность

<!--- [O/ProAm]

[NO_ACADEMIC_OR_PROFESSIONAL_DEGREE] Согласно самой книге, «Gunther Müller, geboren 1980 in Dresden, hat in Frankfurt am Main Politik-, Sozialwissenschaft und Sozialpsychologie studiert und arbeitet im PR-Bereich.»

[NO_SCEDRECO]

[REVIEW_CHECK] 2021-8-17

[NO_PDF] -->
1. Müller Gunther — Die Krone der Schöpfung꞉ Die größten Irrtümer über uns Menschen (Lübbe Digital, 2013).epub

<a id="Когнитивные-искажения"></a>
## Когнитивные искажения

<!--- [ACADEMIC_DEGREE] «Professor Psychology Division, Online Psychology Division, Graduate School of Education and Psychology; PhD, University of California, Los Angeles» — https://gsep.pepperdine.edu/about/our-people/faculty/david-levy/

[POSITIVE_OR_NEUTRAL_REVIEW][REVIEW_HIGH_ERUDITION] Heather M. Mong, Benjamin A. Clegg — https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Benjamin-Clegg-4/publication/272704293_How_to_Think_Straight_about_Errors_in_Your_Thinking_A_Review_of_Tools_of_Critical_Thinking_Metathoughts_for_Psychology/links/54da6a2d0cf2ba88a68d2f37/How-to-Think-Straight-about-Errors-in-Your-Thinking-A-Review-of-Tools-of-Critical-Thinking-Metathoughts-for-Psychology.pdf — «However, as is often the case throughout the book, Levy’s explanation of the error is fairly narrow and somewhat shallow, and for this particular topic that means there is surprisinglylimited exploration of the tricky concept of causation», «You can quickly pick up the chapter, read it, and move on, but the exploration is not deep, nor are you directed to sources where you could find greater detail», «A closer examination of Levy’s classification of theories raises a few questions.», «Levy’s physics examples, like electricity, are often farmore understood at a fundamental level than psychological constructs like personality. To say that theseare equally intangible seems to be oversimplifying, and perhaps even misrepresenting, the nature of the twofields and the range of phenomena being theorized about in both disciplines.», «Consequently,people would need to be more wary of the hindsight bias for outcomes which surprise them than for thoseevent outcomes that do not. To us these findings suggest depth and nuances for this potential antidote thatare simply not present in Levy’s discussion. Although Levy carefully picks his words, it seems like a more direct statement on the limitations of the antidote being offered could have left the reader more informed.», «This book seems especially valuable to someone learning about these errors for the first time, with approachable explanations that are clear and concise. Levy clearly has a gift for explaining complex concepts in ways that those outside the field can readily grasp.», «Levy’s book serves an almost unique role in focusing on practical insights for improvingcritical thinking specifically as it relates to psychology and daily life.», «The antidotes to the errors, while clearly necessary in a book designed to provide tools to enhancecritical thinking, are rarely empirically supported, either in describing the antidote itself, or in documenting the effectiveness of the antidote in preventing the error-prone thought pattern. Of course, this generally points to gaps in the field of psychology.», «Improving critical thinking needs to be based on what does and does not work, and merely offering a suggestion that is simply the opposite of the error may not be effective.», «But developing critical thinking in individuals without content knowledge of anarea is problematic (Willingham, 2007). It is not always clear how much value will be obtained for thosestudents who will go on to content classes in the discipline of psychology.», «While the book would undoubtedly be beneficialfor this audience, there are features that detract from the potential impact, including the lack of depth inplaces when exploring concepts, and the absence of data or concrete examples to demonstrate whetherproblems identified are central and common ones.», «Indeed one puzzling omission from a book about metathoughts is the absenceof discussion of work on metacognition.», «This was a quick, clear, and overall mechanically well-written book. The recommendedmethods for avoiding the thought errors were frequently just instructions not to commit the error, althoughthe ultimate effectiveness of such an approach to avoiding many of these errors is questionable.»

[ADDITIONAL_READING] Hansen Hans V., Pinto Robert C. — «Fallacies. Classical and Contemporary Readings»

Hamblin Charles Leonard — «Fallacies»

Harriet Salatas Waters PhD, Wolfgang Schneider PhD, John G. Borkowski — «Metacognition, Strategy Use, and Instruction»

Шабри Кристофер, Саймонс Дэниэл — «Невидимая горилла»

Timothy J. Perfect, Bennett L. Schwartz — «Applied Metacognition»

Malcolm Gladwell — «Blink: The Power of Thinking Without Thinking»

Ариэли Дэн — «Предсказуемая иррациональность»

Derek J. Koehler, Nigel Harvey — «Blackwell Handbook of Judgment and Decision Making»

Gerd Gigerenzer, Peter M. Todd — «Simple Heuristics That Make Us Smart»

Douglas J. Hacker, John Dunlosky, Arthur C. Graesser — «Metacognition in Educational Theory and Practice»

Forarty, Robin — «How to Teach Metacognitive Reflection»

[NO_SCEDRECO] -->
1. Levy David A. — Tools of Critical Thinking꞉ Metathoughts for Psychology (Waveland Press, 2010).pdf
<!--- [ADDITIONAL_READING] Ronald Giphart, Mark van Vugt — «Mismatch: How Our Stone Age Brain Deceives Us Every Day (And What We Can Do About It)» -->
1. [Канеман Даниэль](https://bigenc.ru/economics/text/2041282) — Думай медленно… решай быстро (АСТ, 2016).pdf

<a id="Ментальные-ловушки"></a>
## Ментальные ловушки

<!--- [INFO] «Andre Kukla is Professor of Psychology and of Philosophy at the University of Toronto» — https://www.utsc.utoronto.ca/psych/emeritus .

[NOTE] Нет ссылок на источники. Только категория «Профессионалы».
-->
1. [Кукла Андре](https://www.utsc.utoronto.ca/psych/emeritus) — Ментальные ловушки. Глупости, которые делают разумные люди, чтобы испортить себе жизнь (Альпина Бизнес Букс, 2009).pdf
<!--- [ACADEMIC_DEGREE] Не нашёл авторитетных источников, подтверждающих PhD у Фримана, но нашёл, что Фриман — EdD. Похоже, у EdD нет академической строгости как у PhD: “There is some perception that these degrees are light on academic rigor” — https://psych.csuci.edu/students/graduateschoolguide/phd-vs-edd . Можно отнести Фримана к профессионалам, но не учёным. ДеВолф, согласно самой книге, популяризатор науки и писатель.

[INFO] Нет сносок на источники.

[BOOK_SERIES] Сам себе психолог

[NO_OCR] -->
1. [Фриман Артур](https://digitalcommons.pcom.edu/portraits/43/), Девульф Роуз — 10 глупейших ошибок, которые совершают люди (Питер, 2011).pdf

<a id="NR-53"></a>
### NR

<a id="Истории-финансового-успеха-от-первого-лица-3"></a>
#### Истории финансового успеха от первого лица

<!--- [INFO] Не нашёл информацию об учёных званиях Дэна, Чип же PhD in Psychology

[CRIM] Бестселлеры, кейсы

[INFO] Не нашёл отрицательных профессиональных отзывов на их книги

[NOTE] Положительная характеристика о коммерческих компаниях, полученная от самих компаний. Для категории «Ad» этого, по моему мнению, недостаточно, однако категория «с ограничениями». 

[CRIM_REDONDAS] «Интернет-магазин обуви Zappos заработал репутацию своим исключительным обслуживанием клиентов. Об удивительных подвигах персонала ходят легенды.», «Культура Zappos — курьезная и впечатляющая. Для некоторых людей это рай, а другим это кажется избыточным.»

[Дэн](https://centers.fuqua.duke.edu/case/team_profiles/dan-heath/), [Чип](https://www.gsb.stanford.edu/faculty-research/faculty/chip-heath). Издательство «Манн, Иванов и Фербер».
-->
1. Хиз Чип, Хиз Дэн — Ловушки мышления. Как принимать решения, о которых вы не пожалеете (2016).pdf

<a id="Принятие-решений"></a>
## Принятие решений

<!--- [INFO] Авторы — учёные, однако нет научных редакторов и ссылок на источники, из-за чего категория снижена.
[NO_PDF] -->
1. [Harvard Business Review](https://www.forbes.com/sites/poetsandquants/2019/10/25/profs-plan-a-rival-to-the-harvard-business-review/?sh=2591f24310dc) — Методы принятия решений (Альпина Паблишер, 2017).fb2

<a id="Математическая-теория-принятия-решений"></a>
### Математическая теория принятия решений

<a id="NR-54"></a>
#### NR

<a id="Научный-стиль"></a>
##### Научный стиль

<!--- [NOTE_FULL_NAME] Подиновский Владислав Владимирович — Идеи и методы теории важности критериев в многокритериальных задачах принятия решений (Наука, 2019) -->
1. [Подиновский Владислав](https://www.hse.ru/org/persons/64908) — Идеи и методы теории важности критериев в многокритериальных задачах принятия решений (Наука, 2019).pdf

<a id="Рассуждения"></a>
## Рассуждения

1. [Mercier Hugo](https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=b3o24EEAAAAJ), [Sperber Dan](https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=tBC-e1kAAAAJ&hl=en) — The Enigma Of Reason (Harvard University Press, 2017).pdf

<a id="Рациональное-мышление"></a>
## Рациональное мышление

1. [Станович Кейт](https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=jWRPvwkAAAAJ) — Рациональное мышление. Что не измеряют тесты способностей (Карьера Пресс, 2016).pdf

<a id="Рисковая-грамотность"></a>
## Рисковая грамотность

<!--- [ACADEMIC_DEGREE] Ph.D., Department of Psychology, LMU Munich — https://www.mpib-berlin.mpg.de/staff/gerd-gigerenzer/curriculum-vitae

[AUTHOR_PROJECT] Гигеренцер возглавлял Center for Adaptive Behavior and Cognition (ABC) в «Max Planck Institute for Human Development» — https://www.mpib-berlin.mpg.de/en

[CRIM_SPEAKER] https://ed.ted.com/lessons/how-likely-is-a-shark-attack-gerd-gigerenzer

[POSITIVE_OR_NEUTRAL_REVIEW][REVIEW_RETELLING] Jasper Riemann — https://www.budrich-journals.de/index.php/360grad/article/download/22018/19254 — «o bleibt das Buch letztlich leichte Kost, die zwar we-sentliche Bereiche der moder-nen Gesellschaft berührt, dabei aber über unterhaltsame und eingängige Erklärungen nicht hinauskommt. Es wäre aller-dings auch keine populärwis-senschaftliche Ratgeberlektüre, verfügte es über eine solche philosophische Tiefe wie die eines Immanuel Kants.»

Dr. Hans-Peter Heekerens, Hochschullehrer i.R. für Sozialarbeit/Sozialpädagogik und Pädagogik an der Hochschule München — https://www.socialnet.de/rezensionen/15450.php — «Aber mir, der ich mit der Luhmannschen Unterscheidung seit Langem operiere (vgl. Heekerens, 1995), scheint, dass in Gerd Gigerenzers theoretischer Fassung von „Risiko“ allzu Vieles im Uneindeutigen und Ungefähren bleibt; doch dies zu klären bedürfte vertiefter erkenntnisund wissenschaftstheoretischer Reflexion.», «Daher sei das Buch allen zur Sozialen Arbeit Gehörenden empfohlen, die sich mit „Risiko“ vertieft beschäftigen können, müssen oder wollen, sei es aus theoretischen oder praktischen Gründen, sei es in der Profession oder der Disziplin.»

[REVIEW_ONE_PAGE] Laura Martignon, Ludwigsburg — https://www.stochastik-in-der-schule.de/sisonline/struktur/Jahrgang34-2014/Heft%201/2014_1_Martignon2.pdf

[ADDITIONAL_READING] Gerd Gigerenzer — «Calculated Risks: How to Know When Numbers Deceive You»

Gerd Gigerenzer — «Simply Rational: Decision Making in the Real World»

Gerd Gigerenzer — «Rationality for mortals: how people cope with uncertainty»

Konstantinos V. Katsikopoulos; Özgür Şimşek; Marcus Buckmann; Gerd Gigerenzer — «Classification in the Wild: The Science and Art of Transparent Decision Making»

Tiemeijer W.L., Thomas C.A., Prast H.M. (edited by) — «De menselijke beslisser : Over de psychologie van keuze en gedrag»

Tiemeijer W.L. — «Hoe mensen keuzes maken De psychologie van het beslissen»

[NO_PDF][NO_SCEDRECO] -->
1. [Гигеренцер Герд](https://pure.mpg.de/rest/items/item_2096947/component/file_2096946/content) — Понимать риски. Как выбирать правильный курс (КоЛибри, Азбука-Аттикус, 2015).fb2

<a id="Самооправдания"></a>
## Самооправдания

1. [Теврис Кэрол](https://calvin.edu/directory/series/carol-tavris), [Аронсон Эллиот](https://psychology.ucsc.edu/about/people/faculty.php?uid=elliot) — Ошибки, которые были допущены (но не мной). Почему мы оправдываем глупые убеждения, плохие решения и пагубные действия (Инфотропик Медиа, 2012).djvu

<a id="Самоконтроль"></a>
# Самоконтроль

<a id="Самоконтроль-по-телеологическому-бихевиоризму"></a>
## Самоконтроль по телеологическому бихевиоризму

<!--- [ACADEMIC_DEGREE] «PhD, Research Professor: Emeritus Distinguished Professor, Cognitive Science», «Studying choice and decision-making in humans and non-humans with the aim of understanding the psychological and economic basis of self-control, addiction, social cooperation, and altruism.» — https://www.stonybrook.edu/commcms/psychology/faculty/faculty_profiles/hrachlin

[POSITIVE_OR_NEUTRAL_REVIEW] Edmund Fantino and Stephanie Stolarz-Fantino, University Of California, San Diego, [Journal Of The Experimental Analysis Of Behavior](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1284891/pdf/jeabehav007800100117.pdf) — «Although we take some issue with teleolog-ical behaviorism, the theory of behavior advocated by Rachlin, we recommend this book to anyone interested in self-control.», «From the standpointof evaluating a book as a useful textbook fora seminar, it is far more important that thebook inspires intelligent and heated discussion than that it inspires total agreement.», «Despite the applied implications of temporally extended response patterning, this is avowedly not a ‘‘self-help’’ book, as Rachlintakes pains to state in his Introduction. Actual methods of instituting behavioral patterningto enhance self-control and monitoring one’sadherence to these patterns are not emphasized.», «For example, Rachlinequates commitment with a reduction in freedom, an equation that we believe holds in only a narrow sense.», «Rachlin was among the first investigators of self-control to recognize it as a special case ofchoice (immediate small reward vs. a largerdelayed reward) and to point out that behav-ior involving self-control must therefore obey the normal laws of choice (e.g., Rachlin&Green, 1972). It is not surprising that a com-prehensive discussion of self-control inevitably involves discussion of some general principles of behavior.», «In any event, Rachlin is surely correct thatpersistent behavior often assists us in achiev-ing our goals; this, in turn, most likely con-tributes to sunk-cost errors.», «In all of these cases, although thebroad parallels are appreciated, the extent ofthe concordance, particularly when quantita-tive theories are involved, is by no meansagreed on», «Rachlin’s treatment of gambling is one ofthe high points of his insightful book.», «A potential problem with Rachlin’s presentation of teleological behav-iorism is its apparently unabashedly goal-directed character. In this book Rachlin does not make clear the extent to which the emphasis on final cause (as exemplified by his remarks quoted above, about the cash at the cash machine) depends on consequences (the final cause) previously experienced.», «In our view, the powerfuland intriguing analysis of self-control presented in The Science of Self-Control has broad applicability, whether or not we accept the author’s view of teleological behaviorism. Thisis indeed “a good read.”»

[REVIEW_RETELLING] Juan Pablo Páez, Universidad Católica de Colombia, [Revista Latinoamericana de Psicología](https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/805/80537219.pdf)

[NO_SCEDRECO] -->
1. Rachlin Howard — The Science of Self-Control (Harvard University Press, 2000).pdf

<a id="Саморегуляция"></a>
## Саморегуляция

<a id="Аутогенная-тренировка"></a>
### Аутогенная тренировка

<!--- [NOTE] Шульц публично выступал за уничтожение психически неполноценных людей, принудительную стерилизацию; участвовал в бесчеловечных опытах над гомосексуалами — https://doctorsonly.co.il/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/2008_4_5.pdf . Аутогенная тренировка, похоже, не считается паранаукой — https://edzardernst.com/2019/12/autogenic-training-is-an-effective-therapy-for-managing-stress/ , https://sci-hub.se/10.1186/s13643-020-01336-3 . Вероятно, отнести в категорию «с ограничениями». -->
1. [Шульц Иоганн Генрих](https://sci-hub.se/10.1080/00029157.1971.10402101) — Аутогенная тренировка (Медицина, 1985).pdf

<a id="Саморазвитие"></a>
# Саморазвитие

<a id="Антропотехника"></a>
## Антропотехника

<a id="Неолиберальная-эксплуатация-антропотехники"></a>
### Неолиберальная эксплуатация антропотехники

<!--- [PROFESSIONAL_DEGREE] [University of Tasmania](https://www.utas.edu.au/profiles/staff/social-change/melissa-gregg) — «Melissa is a Senior Principal Engineer at Intel, based in the United States». Google Scholar — https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=O1OFkLcAAAAJ .

[REVIEW_CHECK] 2021-6-13

[POSITIVE_OR_NEUTRAL_REVIEW][REVIEW_RETELLING] Anna Maria Ozimek, Tallinn University, [Information, Communication & Society](https://sci-hub.se/10.1080/1369118X.2019.1696383) — «Nonetheless, Gregg’s assessment of‘mindful labour’is not overly critical and deterministic.», «Counterproductive provides an important contribution to understanding the modernworld of work.», «Furthermore, her engagement with athleticism and religious connotations provides alternative frameworks to conceptualise ‘productivity’ and ‘mindfulness’ in con-temporary working lives. In summary, Counterproductive is a must-read for everyoneinterested in the sociology of work, especially for those investigating the development of digitaltools and their impact on workers’lives.»

Julia Scatliff O’Grady, Assistant Professor and Chair of Communication Studies at St. Andrews University in North Carolina, [Journal of Cultural Economy](https://www.academia.edu/download/60334797/Counterproductive_Time_Management_in_the_Knowledge_Economy20190819-86042-d2029m.pdf) — «Both examples demonstrate what is possible at the intersection of athleticism and mindfulness, but also seem some-what shallow relative to the many challenges faced in the workplace», «One wonders whether Gregg feels discordant about her own dependency on the labor of domesticworkers, since in the book she cites the research of both Sara Ahmed and Sarah Sharma, who eachargue that one’s own ability to manage time may‘diminish the time of others’(p. 128). I wish that Gregg had devoted more space to thinking about the ramifications of this kind of dependency.», «Gregg mentions work-life balanceliterature in an extensive footnote in Chapter One, but notes her disappointment in its heteronor-mative‘frame’(p. 154). Despite Gregg’s reluctance to include the genre in her analysis, its wide cir-culation among time management bestsellers seems too influential to relegate to a footnote», «The absence of the work-life balance genre in the body of the text does appear to trouble Gregg.»

Корнилов Алексей Михайлович, Финансовый университет при Правительстве РФ, ВШЭ, [Управление наукой: теория и практика](https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/ekonomika-znaniy-i-optimizatsiya-vremeni-retsenziya-na-knigu-m-gregg-counterproductive-time-management-in-the-knowledge-economy/pdf) — «Как учёный, автор «Обратного эффекта» много лет отдала изучению гендерной проблематики, и до сих пор не упускает случая напомнить о собственной приверженности идеалам и ценностям феминизма. Данное обстоятельство – ни коим образом само по себе не дискредитирующее авторский дискурс – тем не менее, психологически трудно не сопоставить с той удивительной настойчивостью, с которой в книге проводится тезис о принципиальной зависимости наиболее передовых теорий по управлению научно-техническим сектором от практик, накопленных и концептуально обобщённых домашними хозяйками «проклятого патриархального» прошлого.», «При всей нетривиальности хода авторской мысли в этой части исследования число явных параллелей, обнаруженных Мелиссой Грегг между работами гуру современного тайм-менеджмента – того же Дэвида Аллена, их предшественников столетней давности, например, Фредерика Тейлора, – с отдельными сочинениями по домашнему хозяйству, следует признать весьма существенным и вполне заслуживающим теоретического осмысления.»

Benjamin H. Snyder, Williams College, [Contemporary Sociology: A Journal of Reviews](https://sci-hub.se/10.1177/0094306120902418q) — «At the same time,the book sometimes skirts topics of intenseinterest to sociologists. Though it focuses on the spiritual dimension of productivity, for example, it makes only passing connec-tion to Weber», «More curious is the book’s conclusion,which outlines eight ‘‘principles for post-work productivity’’ that can ‘‘move our aspi-rations… from the corporate to the collec-tive interest’’ and prioritize ‘‘practices ofselflessness and care’’ (p. 138). This is a laud-able vision shared by many sociologists, butthe book does not engage with the manyexisting concrete proposals for achieving it.», «How ought we to think about universal basicincome, collective organizing among gigworkers, platform cooperativism, or policyideas that constrain the tech companies pio-neering exploitative productivity? Howmight companies such as Intel reimaginedisruption, automation, fast failure, andrisk in ways that are more responsible inan age of massive economic inequality?», «If you have ever felt simultaneouslythrilled and disgusted with yourself at mas-tering your to-do list,Counterproductivecanhelp explain why. It is an excellent resourcefor anyone wanting to explore the culturalmeanings of today’s technological toolsfor managing our time and, ultimately,ourselves.»

Raymond June, Ph.D. from the University of California at Berkeley, [EPIC](https://www.epicpeople.org/making-productivity-social-again-melissa-greggs-counterproductive-time-management-in-the-knowledge-economy/) — «For this reader, the greatest contribution of this richly researched book is the reflexive implications of her argument.», «Nevertheless, such experiments must necessarily articulate with wider efforts that cut across white-and blue-collar as well as salaried employees and contingent workers in a range of industries to counter work-life imbalances. And this is where Gregg, as I see it, could have pushed her provocations in more radical directions by attending to a greater diversity of actors that are needed to stimulate public conversations and coordinated action around time, work, and leisure.», «Like most academic books, Counterproductive identifies and explicates a problem while shying away from explicit policy recommendations and design solutions. Nevertheless, Gregg breaks from the dominant mode of negative academic critique by pressing us to reflect on what another world of work could look like. She reminds us that we are not hostage to enterprise techniques that valorize meaningless productivity.», «A reflexive socio-historical analysis of how we arrived at today’s hyper-individualistic drive to be productive in our careers is a first step towards broader societal efforts to reclaim labor and transform it into the interests of all workers.»

[BOOK_OR_AUTHOR_OR_CONCEPT_CRITICISM] Kristin Smith, School of Social Work Ryerson University, [Somatechnics](https://www.euppublishing.com/doi/full/10.3366/soma.2019.0291) — «It is hard to say how Daybreakers is not precisely the individualizing, self-help approach so roundly critiqued at the beginning of the book.», «However, Gregg insists she sees hope in the ways that coworking arrangements and Daybreakers both play with and challenge the constraints of conventional work arrangements.  Gregg admits that there are problems with these examples, most notably, the deep class and racial exclusions that exist within such elitist practices.», «Another problem ignored by Gregg is that in the current context of flexible labour, the 9–5 routine rarely exists anymore for knowledge workers.», «Indeed, Gregg's concluding examples of post-work productivity are available only to the most privileged of knowledge workers and do nothing to ameliorate the coordinated and systemic assault on union organizing for collective rights.», «In the end, for Somatechnics readers, Counterproductive provides a fascinating overview and compelling analysis of a century of managerial strategies aimed at perfecting the model of ‘worker-as-machine,’ the results of which are the erosion of collective labour solidarity. However, a vision for how to re-establish infrastructures that enable collective interests, meaningful and humane work-lives, and mechanisms for care and well-being, remains elusive.»

Clem Guthro, Independent librarian, [Journal of Intellectual Freedom & Privacy](https://www.journals.ala.org/index.php/jifp/article/download/6784/9516) — « While her arguments against “productivity” as the defining category of American workplace culture have some merit, the new ideas she proposes appear only to have significant import for the gig economy and not the American workplace as a whole.», «Gregg makes two arguments about the self-help system that should be questioned. She argues that a predominant role of self-help is to help in avoiding procrastination, rather than the more likely need to manage an over-whelming workload. She also states that self-help tech-niques separate the individual from the needs of others, without providing convincing evidence as to why this might be true.», «Gregg, I believe, is overreaching in laying blame for the abandonment of work-life balance on productivity apps, rather than work requirements, personal and family obligations, that became blurred in the dot com era.», «Again, Gregg’s analysis here seems simplistic in laying blame for the emphasis on the individual over the concerns of others on time and self-management, rather than the historic American culture of individualism.», «While Gregg’s idea of mindful labor has merit and could have significant personal health benefits, she does not address how mindful labor actually works in the corporate workplace, outside of some progressive organiza-tions like Google.», «Although Gregg sees the principles as providing a framework for future work, I remain skeptical whether the principles hold outside of the gig economy and a small sector of upper level knowledge workers.», «Nevertheless, Gregg’s analysis provides produc-tive insights in the ways that productivity has framed the work narrative, at times in less than beneficial ways.», «This book is appropriate for the general public, sociolo-gists, business professionals, freelance workers, and librar-ians, concerned with the understanding the unhealthy impact that the focus on time management and productiv-ity may have on the workplace and their own lives»

Kumud Bhansali, South Asian University, [Anthropology of Work Review](https://sci-hub.se/10.1111/AWR.12203) — «In the next part of this chapter, she critiques the rise of secular mindfulness as an industry but also seems to sympathize with it—which ironically raises the same problematic from which the time-man-agement-advice literature suffers: in focusing on whatto do in “the absence of a guiding principle for doing it” (98), that all-important why remains unaddressed.», «That workplace communities are also deeply interlocked and embedded within political, economic, and social milieus is also a fact that cannot be overlooked, which she acknowledges, albeit cursorily», «While Gregg makes a few provocative assertions — “to be productive is to subscribe to a belief structure without an ethics, an epistemology without an ontology” (99) — her inability to engage substantively with these questions is troubling. This may be because doing so would require that she question the inherent framework of the “free” market. Furthermore, the alternatives proposed by Gregg come across as tools to negotiate with the existing rhythms of capitalism and, therefore, also run the risk of being co-opted by it. Gregg avoids direct confrontation with the shape-shifting nature of this beast and does not consider, even for a moment, its ability to transmogrify into that which it seeks to challenge.», «That “evacuating middle-class jobs to the lowest global bidder” (17) is taking place within a cap-italist world-system is something that Gregg’s synthesis does not seem to take into consideration», «Lastly, what makes work communal versus what turns it into a self-serving act is an essential debate that needs to be addressed, something which Gregg, unfortunately, does not do.», «Despite these reservations, Counterproductive covers much new ground and offers insights on the genre of time-management-advice lit-erature. It also serves as a poignant reminder of the paradoxes of today’s interconnected world, where our working selves have never been more connected and more isolated at the same time.»

[N/ProM]

[NO_SCEDRECO] -->
1. Gregg Melissa — Counterproductive꞉ Time Management in the Knowledge Economy (Duke University Press, 2018).pdf

<a id="Жизненные-перемены"></a>
## Жизненные перемены

<a id="NR-55"></a>
### NR

<a id="Истории-финансового-успеха-от-первого-лица-4"></a>
#### Истории финансового успеха от первого лица

1. Хиз Чип, Хиз Дэн — [Переключайтесь. Как меняться, когда это непросто](https://sci-hub.se/https://link.springer.com/article/10.1057/be.2010.43) (2018).pdf

<a id="Зеттелькастен"></a>
## Зеттелькастен

<!--- [ACADEMIC_DEGREE] 1991 until 1994 Doctorate — http://ahrens-ip.de/en/vitae.html

[POSITIVE_OR_NEUTRAL_REVIEW][REVIEW_RETELLING] Melanie Schiller, University of Groningen — https://www.rug.nl/research/portal/files/61627952/Book_review_how_to_take_smart_notes.pdf — «However, following Ahrens’ initial criticism of a supposed linear writing process, the suggested steps read more like a disquisition on human cognition and the psychological undercurrents of (academic) learning and writing, rather than offering a set of “how-to” rules.», «Since Luhmann’s system of the slip box is well-known, Ahrens’ valuable contribution lies less in providing an innovative technique of note-taking and the organization of academic writing, but more in reflecting critically on the very nature of writing as a medium of knowledge generation.», «he unfortunately misses the opportunity to reflect on the very conditions of academic life that create a demand for a book like his own in the first place»

[CRIM_SCIENCE_EDITOR] Агамалиев Рустам Тельманович — [учитель английского языка, педагог дополнительного образования](https://sch1194zg.mskobr.ru/teacher-card/agamaliev-rustam-telmanovich)

[ADDITIONAL_READING] Дэниел Пинк — Таймхакинг. Как наука помогает нам всё делать вовремя

Лора Вандеркам — Книга о потерянном времени. У вас больше возможностей, чем вы думаете

[NO_SCEDRECO]

[BOOK_SERIES] Между строк

-->
1. Аренс Зонке — Как делать полезные заметки꞉ Эффективная система организации идей по методу Zettelkasten (Манн, Иванов и Фербер, 2022).pdf

<a id="Индустрия-саморазвития"></a>
## Индустрия саморазвития

<a id="Роль-гуру-саморазвития-в-Германии-и-Китае"></a>
### Роль гуру саморазвития в Германии и Китае

<!--- [ACADEMIC_DEGREE] Ph.D. University of Mannheim, in cooperation with NYU — https://pku.academia.edu/EricHendriks

[ACADEMIC_DEGREE_EDITOR] Editor-in-Chief Mehdi P. Amineh (Amsterdam Institute for Social Science Research, University of Amsterdam, International Institute for Asian Studies, Leiden University)

[NO_REVIEW] Искал на английском, голландском, китайском и немецком

[ADDITIONAL_READING] «Oracle at the Supermarket. The American Preoccupation with Self-help Books» — Steven Starker; «Self-Help, Inc.:Makeover Culture in American Life» — Micki McGee
-->
1. [Hendriks-Kim Eric C.](https://www.fiw.uni-bonn.de/democracy-research/staff/eric-c.-hendriks) — Life Advice from Below. The Public Role of Self-Help Coaches in Germany and China (Brill, 2017).pdf

<a id="Книги-по-саморазвитию"></a>
## Книги по саморазвитию

<a id="Понимание-феномена-книг-по-саморазвитию"></a>
### Понимание феномена книг по саморазвитию

<!--- [ACADEMIC_DEGREE] Ph.D. in folklore from Indiana University — https://folklore.indiana.edu/about/emeriti-faculty/dolby-sandra.html
[NO_REVIEW][NO_SCEDRECO] -->
1. [Dolby Sandra K.](https://folklore.indiana.edu/about/emeriti-faculty/dolby-sandra.html) — Self-Help Books. Why Americans Keep Reading Them (University of Illinois Press, 2005).pdf

<a id="Концентрация-и-внимание"></a>
## Концентрация и внимание

<a id="NR-56"></a>
### NR

<a id="Гуру-1"></a>
#### Гуру

<!--- [NO_DEGREE][NO_REVIEW]

[CRIM_REDONDAS] Не нашёл информации о научных достижениях Брегмана, зато он «CEO компании Bregman Partners, помогающей успешным людям становиться лучшими лидерами, создавать более эффективные команды и вдохновлять организации на выдающиеся результаты» — https://hbr-russia.ru/authors/760067-piter-bregman

[CRIM_COACHING] https://bregmanpartners.com/executive-coaching/

[CRIM_SPEAKER] https://bregmanpartners.com/speaking/

[NO_SCEDRECO][NO_SOURCES]
-->
1. [Брегман Питер](https://www.harpercollins.com/blogs/authors/peter-bregman) — 18 минут. Как повысить концентрацию, перестать отвлекаться и сделать действительно важные дела (Манн, Иванов и Фербер, 2014).pdf
<!--- [NOTE] Согласно самой книге, Роланд Р. Гейссельхарт получил образование психолога в частной школе; один из наиболее известных инструкторов по техникам запоминания и концентрации внимания. Практикует коачинг — https://www.geisselhart-lernen.de/neu2/?page_id=671 . -->
1. [Гейссельхарт Роланд](https://www.babelio.com/auteur/Roland-Geisselhart/202512), Буркарт Кристиане — Память. Тренировка памяти и техники концентрации внимания (Омега-Л, 2006).pdf
<!--- [NOTE] Нётеберг — специалист в области Agile, не психологии. Занимается коачингом, лидерством — https://agilecoach.staffannoteberg.com/ . -->
1. [Нётеберг Штаффан](https://www.oreilly.com/pub/au/3885) — Тайм-менеджмент по помидору. Как концентрироваться на одном деле хотя бы 25 минут (Альпина Паблишер, 2013).pdf

<a id="Недостоверная-информация-9"></a>
#### Недостоверная информация

<!--- [ACADEMIC_DEGREE] PhD — https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/contributors/dan-goleman-phd

[POSITIVE_OR_NEUTRAL_REVIEW] Jorge Perez — https://digitalcommons.andrews.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1237&context=jacl

[BOOK_OR_AUTHOR_OR_CONCEPT_CRITICISM] Stephen Bigger, University of Worcester — https://eprints.worc.ac.uk/63/2/Review_Murphy_EI_2006_F.pdf — «Therefore the EI bandwagon is viewed as unscientific and ineffective in practical terms.», «At the scientific end, measures of EI ‘abilities’ are shown to be closely related to general measures of ability (in other words, IQ), with the best test said to be the MSCEIT version 2 (Mayer, Salovey, Carusso EI Test)», «This book exposes all the weaknesses of the Goleman model of EI and declares it ill-defined and bankrupt»;

Jordan Peterson, University of Toronto — https://www.huffpost.com/entry/is-the-theory-of-emotional-intelligence-a-scam_b_58af5490e4b02f3f81e44558 — «Let me say it again: There is no such thing as an EQ. Scientifically, it’s a fraudulent concept, a fad, a convenient bandwagon, a corporate marketing scheme»
Jeffrey Conte, San Diego University — https://sci-hub.se/https://www.jstor.org/stable/4093838 — «Validity evidence for El measures has lagged behind reliability evidence. Content validity evidence for EI measures is lacking because of vague theoretical development for many of the measures and because the content across EI measures varies widely.»;

Steve Hein, MBA — «How Goleman manipulates his readers» — https://eqi.org/gole.htm#How%20Goleman%20manipulates%20his%20readers,%20and%20other%20commentary%20on%20him , «How Goleman misled the public» — https://eqi.org/gole.htm#How%20Goleman%20misled%20the%20public

Tom Bennett, ResearchED author — https://www.newscientist.com/article/mg21929320-200-separating-neuromyths-from-science-in-education/ , «Most worryingly, there is no evidence that the brain works in the way suggested by multiple intelligence theory»

[CRIM_SPEAKER] https://www.ted.com/speakers/daniel_goleman
-->
1. [Гоулман Дэниел](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daniel_Goleman) — Фокус. О внимании, рассеянности и жизненном успехе (Corpus, 2015).pdf

<a id="Непрофессионализм-11"></a>
#### Непрофессионализм

<!--- [NOTE] Согласно самой книге, Эберхард — преподаватель немецкого языка и литературы, не психолог -->
1. Хойль Эберхард — Искусство концентрации. Как улучшить память за 10 дней (Феникс, 2005).pdf

<a id="Паранаука-1"></a>
#### Паранаука

<!--- [NOTE] Сигел практикует «межличностную нейробиологию» — https://drdansiegel.com/interpersonal-neurobiology/ . «Seemingly accepting wholesale the belief that the brain is the final frontier, some are determined to sell us the map thereto and make more than a buck while they are at it. Thus, we see terms such as “Somatic/sensorimotor Psychotherapy,” “Interpersonal Neurobiology,” “Neurogenesis and Neuroplasticity,” “Unlocking the Emotional Brain,” “NeuroTherapy,” “Neuro Reorganization,” and so on.» — https://www.scottdmiller.com/neurobabble-comments-from-dr-mark-hubble-on-the-latest-fad-in-the-world-of-therapy/ . Сигел упоминается в книге «Pseudoscience: The Conspiracy Against Science»: https://books.google.ru/books?id=ZLT4DwAAQBAJ&pg=PA230&dq="Leading+figures+within+the+mindfulness+movement+such+as+Jon+Kabat-+Zinn" .

[NOTE][CRIM_SCIENCE_EDITOR] «Научный редактор» — Евгений Андреевич Пустошкин, «один из основных представителей и распространителей интегральной метатеории в России — https://www.b17.ru/turiyatita/ . «WIP is not a scientific endeavor» — https://sci-hub.se/10.1080/19349637.2012.737685 ; «Frisky dirt: Why Ken Wilber’s new creationism is pseudo-science» — http://www.integralworld.net/lane19.html . -->
1. Сигел Дэниел — Внимательный мозг. Научный взгляд на медитацию (Манн, Иванов и Фербер, 2016).pdf

<a id="Мотивация"></a>
## Мотивация

<!--- [ACADEMIC_DEGREE] Ph.D. in Learning & Technology(Educational Psychology) — https://ccie.ucf.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/12/2017/06/BHoffman.pdf

[CRIM_PR] Книга содержит краткие биографии «мотивационных лидеров»

[POSITIVE_OR_NEUTRAL_REVIEW] Флорова Н. Б., Ермолова Т. В. — https://psyjournals.ru/files/107296/jmfp_2019_n2_Florova_Ermolova.pdf

[ADDITIONAL_READING] Jeff Haden — The Motivation Myth. How High Achievers Really Set Themselves Up to Win

E. L. Kersten — The Art of Demotivation

[NO_SCEDRECO]
-->
1. [Hoffman Bobby](https://ccie.ucf.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/12/2017/06/BHoffman.pdf) — Motivation for Learning and Performance (Academic Press, 2015).pdf

<a id="Наведение-порядка"></a>
## Наведение порядка

<a id="NR-57"></a>
### NR

<a id="Гуру-2"></a>
#### Гуру

<!--- [NO_DEGREE]

[POSITIVE_OR_NEUTRAL_REVIEW] Kristen Ludwigsen, Portland State University — https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1045&context=eng_bookpubpaper , Hana Kudo, Future University Hakodate — http://lib-repos.fun.ac.jp/dspace/bitstream/10445/8808/1/b1016192.pdf#page=7 ; Hazel T. Biana, De La Salle University-Manila — https://www.dlsu.edu.ph/wp-content/uploads/pdf/conferences/arts-congress-proceedings/2018/cc-01.pdf ; Rinda Wahyuni1, Novian Denny Nugraha, S.Sn., M.Sn.2,Dimas Krisna Aditya, S.IP., M.Sn, Universitas Telkom — https://openlibrarypublications.telkomuniversity.ac.id/index.php/artdesign/article/view/12767/12490

[CRIM_SPEAKER] “tidying expert, bestselling author, star of Netflix's hit show, "Tidying Up With Marie Kondo," and founder of KonMari Media, Inc.” — https://shop.konmari.com/pages/about

[CRIM_NO_REFS] -->
1. [Кондо Мари](https://shop.konmari.com/pages/about) — Магическая уборка. Японское искусство наведения порядка дома и в жизни (Издательство «Э», 2015).pdf

<a id="Осознанное-развитие"></a>
## Осознанное развитие

<!--- [ACADEMIC_DEGREE] Эрикссон — «Professor of Psychology at Florida State University. In 1976 he received his Ph. D. in Psychology from University of Stockholm, Sweden, followed by post-doctoral fellowship at Carnegie-Mellon University»; Пул — «Ph.D., is a nonfiction writer specializing in science and technology and has worked as staff for both Science and Nature» — https://greatergood.berkeley.edu/profile/robert_pool

[POSITIVE_OR_NEUTRAL_REVIEW] Pete Van Mullem, Ph.D., Lewis-Clark State College — https://sci-hub.se/https://doi.org/10.1123/iscj.2016-0089 ;

Matthew D. Powless, Indiana University-Bloomington — https://sci-hub.se/10.1080/21520704.2018.1563574

[BOOK_OR_AUTHOR_OR_CONCEPT_CRITICISM][REVIEW_SELF-PUBLISHING] John F. McGowan, Ph.D., University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign — https://mathblog.com/book-review-peak-secrets-from-the-new-science-of-expertise/ ; «The major weakness of the book and Ericsson’s work in general is the vague, shifting definition of “deliberate practice.”», «The problem is that research in mathematics, whether basic or applied, differs substantially from short timed contests generally covering known knowledge or methods.»

Keith Simonton, University of California, Davis, [Intelligence](https://sci-hub.se/10.1016/j.intell.2016.05.005) — «First, in neither book do wefind any treatment of the fascinating re-sults to emerge from Studies of Mathematically Precocious Youth, themost ambitious ongoing longitudinal inquiry into talent development», «Second, neither book treats the most current behavior genetic re-search on the origins of extreme talents and genius», «Third and last, to make the strongest possible case for their favoritecausal factors—grit for Duckworth and deliberate practice for Ericsson—their respective books tend to focus on precisely those achievement domains where these factors just might explain the mostvariance.»

[NO_PDF][NO_SCEDRECO] -->
1. [Эрикссон Андерс](https://psy.fsu.edu/faculty/ericssonk/ericsson.dp.php), [Пул Роберт](https://greatergood.berkeley.edu/profile/robert_pool) — Максимум. Как достичь личного совершенства с помощью современных научных открытий (КоЛибри, 2016).fb2

<a id="Поиск-себя"></a>
## Поиск себя

<!--- [INFO] Научно-художественная литература -->
1. [Леви Владимир Львович](https://psy.su/persons/100_psihologov_rossii/psy/84409/) — Искусство быть собой (Знание, 1991).djvu

<a id="NR-58"></a>
### NR

<a id="Истории-финансового-успеха-от-первого-лица-5"></a>
#### Истории финансового успеха от первого лица

<!--- [ACADEMIC_DEGREE] «Dr. Seelig earned a Ph.D. in Neuroscience from Stanford University School of Medicine where she studied neuroplasticity» — https://profiles.stanford.edu/tina-seelig

[CRIM_SPEAKER] https://www.ted.com/speakers/tina_seelig

[NOTE] Ориентированность на бизнес, что не совсем ясно, если исходить из названия. Неформат для библиотеки непрерывного обучения.

[BOOK_CITATIONS] «Ларри Пейдж, один из основателей Google, как-то раз прочитал лекцию»

[ADDITIONAL_READING] Джеймс Райан — «Погодите, как вы сказали?»

[NO_SCEDRECO][NO_SOURCES][NO_REVIEW] -->
1. Силиг Тина — Почему мне никто не рассказал об этом в 20？ Интенсив по поиску себя в этом мире (Манн, Иванов и Фербер, 2016).pdf

<a id="Привычки"></a>
## Привычки

<a id="NR-59"></a>
### NR

<a id="Паранаучный-бэкграунд-редактора"></a>
#### Паранаучный бэкграунд редактора

<!--- [NOTE] Ксения Александровна Пахорукова — научный редактор русского издания — экотерапевт — https://www.b17.ru/ksp/ . К экопсихологии/-терапии у науки критическое отношение — https://healthybutsmart.com/Ecotherapy+Health+Benefits , https://digitalcommons.humboldt.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1012&context=monographs#page=43 . Категория «Ad», несмотря на то, что к Янгу претензий нет. -->
1. [Янг Шон](https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=Pl_VftAAAAAJ) — Привычки на всю жизнь. Научный подход к формированию устойчивых привычек (Манн, Иванов и Фербер, 2018).pdf

<a id="Принципы-успешных-людей"></a>
## Принципы успешных людей

<a id="NR-60"></a>
### NR

<a id="Паранаука-2"></a>
#### Паранаука

<!--- [ACADEMIC_DEGREE] PhD — «Dr. Judd Biasiotto is a modern day renaissance man with accomplishments ranging from being a sport’s psychologist to three major league baseball teams consisting of the Cincinnati Reds, Pittsburgh Pirates, and the Kansas City Royals» — https://athletrx.org/rugby-muscle-strength-and-power/ ; не нашёл информации о Мэрилин Джонсон Литтлер.

[INFO] В оригинале книга называется «On Becoming World Class»

[CRIM_PARASIENCE] «Вы когда-нибудь читали книгу "Анатомия болезни" Нормана Казенса? Это фантастическая книга. Она вселит в вас мысль, что на свете нет ничего невозможного. У Казенса нашли смертельную болезнь, рак. Врачи сказали, что ему осталось жить всего несколько месяцев. Вместо того, чтобы пасть духом и умереть, Казенс встал и сказал: "Пошли вы все к чёрту, я не собираюсь умирать." И знаете что? Он не умер! В действительности, он до сих пор является самим воплощением здоровья, энтузиазма и бодрости.» [Идеи Казинса паранаучны](https://sci-hub.se/10.1007/978-1-4613-1797-5_23).

[NO_PDF][CRIM_AMATEUR_TRANSLATION][NO_SOURCES][NO_REVIEW][NO_SCEDRECO] -->
1. [Биасиотто Джадд](https://www.mcall.com/news/mc-xpm-1986-08-24-2537247-story.html), Литтлер Мэрилин Джонсон — Как стать… элитой (Самиздат, 2000).fb2

<a id="Продуктивность"></a>
## Продуктивность

<!--- [ACADEMIC_DEGREE] “He holds a Ph.D. in Business Administration from the Graduate School of Business at Stanford University” — https://www.ischool.berkeley.edu/people/morten-hansen

[CRIM_SPEAKER] https://www.mortenhansen.com/speaking/

[POSITIVE_OR_NEUTRAL_REVIEW][REVIEW_RETELLING] Rose O. Sherman, EdD, RN, NEA-BC, CNL, FAAN — https://sci-hub.se/https://www.nurseleader.com/article/S1541-4612(18)30143-5/pdf ; [REVIEW_RETELLING] Stephanie Orellana — https://sci-hub.se/10.1080/08956308.2018.1421384 ; [REVIEW_INTERVIEW] Merete Glorvigen, journalist — https://www.arbeidsnytt.no/boker-great-at-work-morten-hansen/morten-t-hansen-jobb-mindre/104874

[NO_SCANNED_PDF] -->
1. [Хансен Мортен](https://www.ischool.berkeley.edu/people/morten-hansen) — Мастер своего дела. Семь практик высокой продуктивности (Манн, Иванов и Фербер, 2019).pdf

<a id="NR-61"></a>
### NR

<a id="Гуру-3"></a>
#### Гуру

<!--- [NO_DEGREE]

[POSITIVE_OR_NEUTRAL_REVIEW][GOOD_POSITIVE_REVIEW] Francis Heylighen, a Professor at the Free University of Brussels, Clement Vidalis a research assistant in the ECCO group at the Free University of Brussels — https://sci-hub.se/https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0024630108000848 — “When (or even whether) these opportunities are followedup depends more on the constraints of the current situation than on any predetermined plans. Re-ferring to plenty of personal experience, GTD users claim this method minimizes stress, while en-suring that work proceeds smoothly towards maximum productivity.”, “First, the methodminimizes the burden on memory and reasoning by systematically exploiting external memories,which (Allen argues) reduces the anxiety caused by not being sure that you remember everythingyou need to remember. Second, and more fundamentally, the consistent application of GTDshould promote all the features that characterize what Csikszentmihalyi has called the ‘flow’ state:a clear sense of purpose; regular feedback as to-dos are ‘ticked off’ one by one; on-going, unre-strained advance towards goals; and challenges (tasks) adapted to skills (personal abilities) andenvironmental circumstances (affordances).”, “The philosophy underlying GTD is that true produc-tivity should be measured not by the number ofplanned objectivesthat are achieved, but by thenumber ofintrinsically worthwhile results. Whether the results achieved are what was foreseen ornot is irrelevant to their ultimate value: what counts is the total amount of progress made.”

Bach. Kelly Marlith Flores Escudero, Bach. Mirian Noemi Vega Burgos, Universidad Privada del Norte — https://repositorio.upn.edu.pe/bitstream/handle/11537/14964/Flores%20Escudero%20Kelly%20Marlith%20-%20Vega%20Burgos%20Mirian%20Noemi%20%281%29.pdf ;

Carla Lucia Tandazo Tandazo, Univercidad Tecnica Machala — http://repositorio.utmachala.edu.ec/bitstream/48000/15465/1/E-11535_TANDAZO%20TANDAZO%20CARLA%20LUCIA.pdf ;

Mariana Alvim de Sá, Abner Eutéquio Benício da Silva, Guilherme de Freitas Oliveira, Jane Aparecida da Silveira, — Pós-Graduanda em Gerenciamento de Projetos, Navus, Florianopolis — http://navus.sc.senac.br/index.php/navus/article/download/646/pdf — «Durante as pesquisas foi extremamente difícil localizar um trabalho científico (artigos, teses ou dissertações) que tratasse de gerenciamento de tempo ou produtividade de forma que não fosse atrelado a uma área específica como indústria, agronomia, saúde e outras mais.»

[BOOK_OR_AUTHOR_OR_CONCEPT_CRITICISM] Карлссон и Аренс отмечают, что GTD может быть эффективна для бизнеса. Daniel Karlsson, Northumbria University — http://publications.lib.chalmers.se/records/fulltext/63930.pdf — «This is however not the case, GTD does not make the tasks go away and it does not make the tasks more fun to work on either», «GTD does not attempt to make the tasks more fun and in the end we have to work on our tasks even if using GTD» ; Sönke Ahrens, Bundeswehr University Munich — https://books.google.ru/books?id=lHDsDwAAQBAJ&pg=PT16&dq=%22These+are+probably+the+reasons+why+GTD+never+really+caught+on+in+academia,+although+it+is+very+successful+in+business+and+has+a+good+reputation+among+the+self-employed%22#v=onepage&q=%22These%20are%20probably%20the%20reasons%20why%20GTD%20never%20really%20caught%20on%20in%20academia%2C%20although%20it%20is%20very%20successful%20in%20business%20and%20has%20a%20good%20reputation%20among%20the%20self-employed%22&f=false — «Unfortunately, David Allen’s technique cannot simply be transferred to the task of insightful writing», «These are probably the reasons why GTD never really caught on in academia, although it is very successful in business and has a good reputation among the self-employed»

[CRIM_COACHING] https://gettingthingsdone.com/training-coaching/

[NO_SCEDRECO] -->
1. Аллен Дэвид — Как привести дела в порядок. Искусство продуктивности без стресса (Вильямс, 2007).pdf
<!--- [INFO] Кови имеет некоторые научные достижения, но также обладает признаками «успехмэна» -->
1. [Кови Стивен](https://www.nytimes.com/2012/07/17/business/stephen-r-covey-herald-of-good-habits-dies-at-79.html) — [7 навыков высокоэффективных людей. Мощные инструменты развития личности](https://sci-hub.se/https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1350507610389682) (Альпина Бизнес Букс, 2009).pdf
<!--- [NOTE] Цитата из самой книги: «Ицхак Пинтосевич – автор книг и уникальных тренинговых программ по самосовершенствованию, НЛП-тренер, занимает 2-е место в рейтинге Международной ассоциации профессионалов развития личности, тренер успеха № 1 на русскоязычном пространстве». Похож на типичного «успехмэна» — https://un-sci.com/ru/2019/04/25/psihoportret-vymogatelya-znanij/ . -->
1. Пинтосевич Ицхак Борисович — Полный контроль! Тайм-менеджмент нового поколения за 30 дней (Эксмо, 2013).pdf

<a id="Недостоверная-информация-10"></a>
#### Недостоверная информация

<!--- [NOTE] Насчёт Ферриса и его книги имеется множество критических материалов — https://romankalugin.com/5-mifov-o-tim-ferrise/ , https://hbr.org/2012/10/the-truth-behind-the-4-hour-fa , https://www.businessinsider.com/the-hard-truth-about-the-4-hour-workweek-2014-2 , https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2011/jan/22/change-life-success-breeds-hate , https://skeptoid.com/blog/2011/06/14/disappointing-woo-from-outside-magazine/ . С другой стороны, имеются некритические статьи о нём в Scientific American — https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/beautiful-minds/tim-ferriss-on-accelerated-learning-peak-performance-and-living-the-good-life/ и NY Times — https://www.nytimes.com/2011/03/27/fashion/27Ferris.html -->
1. [Феррис Тимоти](https://romankalugin.com/5-mifov-o-tim-ferrise/) — Как работать по четыре часа в неделю. И при этом не торчать в офисе «от звонка до звонка», жить где угодно и богатеть (Добрая книга, 2009).pdf

<a id="Сила-воли"></a>
## Сила воли

<!--- [ACADEMIC_DEGREE] Baumeister, [Florida State University, CV](http://www.fsu.edu/cvdb/RBAUMEISTER.rtf) — «1978 Ph.D., Princeton University. Major: Psychology»

[JOURNALISM_DEGREE] Tierney, [City Journal](https://www.city-journal.org/contributor/john-tierney_912) — «contributing editor to the Manhattan Institute's quarterly publication, City Journal», «joining City Journal after more than two decades as a reporter and columnist with the New York Times», «Tierney has written about urban politics, economics, and culture in his column», «Prior to joining the Times, Tierney was a contributing editor to Discover and Health magazines, a staff writer at Science 81-85 magazine, a reporter for the Washington Star and the Bergen Record, and a freelance writer whose reporting took him to all seven continents. His work has been widely published, including in The Atlantic, Esquire, New York, Reader’s Digest, Vogue, the Chicago Tribune, the Wall Street Journal, and the Washington Post.»

[CRIM_CO-AUTHOR]

[CRIM_BESTSELLER] Согласно самой книге, это «New York Times bestseller»

[CRIM_PR] Глава 3 — «Раздел "Входящие", о котором мечтал Дрю Кэри» — положительные отзывы о Дэвиде Аллене

См. рецензию van Rooij — «De invulling van het eerste hoofdstuk(en de meeste andere) verloopt als volgt.Er wordt gestart met een anekdote overde zelfbeheersing van een Amerikaanse‘celebrity’.»

[FAIL_BIBLIOGRAPHY][BOOK_FILE_WITH_BIBLIOGRAPHY] «Baumeister Roy F., Tierney John — Willpower꞉ Rediscovering the Greatest Human Strength (Penguin Press, 2011).pdf»

[BOOK_SERIES] Книги-драйверы

[Is/Mass]

[POSITIVE_OR_NEUTRAL_REVIEW] Noel Ryan, National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland, [The Journal of Positive Psychology](https://sci-hub.se/10.1080/17439760.2012.711350) — «In conclusion, Willpower: Rediscovering theGreatest Human Strengthis an enjoyable, rewardingand thought-provoking book. Baumeister and Tierneyengage and encourage the reader throughout to re-evaluate the role of willpower in influencing humanbehaviour and the books appeals to both academic andnon-academic audiences alike.», «The book hasa broadly positive message while also highlightingsome of the limits of willpower in practice. This is anexcellent book worth reading.»

Tom Luken, arbeids- en organisatiepsycholoog en zelfstandig onderzoeker en adviseur bij loopbaanvraagstukken, [LoopbaanVisie](http://tom-luken.nl/Wilskracht.pdf) — «Wilskracht is niet altijd overtuigend, maar het is een interessant boek dat vlot en met humor geschreven is. Zoals de laatste tijd helaas bij wel meer psychologische theorieën en experimenten gebeurt, is er inmiddels veel discussie ontstaan over de bevindingen rond ego-depletie. Zo blijken de veronderstelde verbanden tussen zelfcontrole en de hoeveelheid glucose in het bloed niet te bestaan (Kurzban, 2010). Bij een gestandaardiseerde uitvoe-ring van experimenten in verschillende laboratoria is weinig van het ego-depletie effect overgebleven. Kortom: het gaat om interessante en belangrijke fenomenen, maar het fijne hebben we er nog niet van begrepen.»

Ştefan Boncu, Universitatea „Alexandru Ioan Cuza”, Iaşi, [Psihologia socială](https://www.ceeol.com/search/viewpdf?id=109384) — «Cartea scrisă cu talent şi cu grijă pentru claritate de Baumeister şi Tierney scoate în evidenţă beneficiile auto‑controlului, imense pentru individ şi pentru societate.»

[BOOK_OR_AUTHOR_OR_CONCEPT_CRITICISM] Tony van Rooij, onderzoeker bij het IVO te Rotterdam, [Verslaving verwoord](https://sci-hub.se/10.1007/s12501-012-0034-z) — «Regelmatig wordt er gerefe-reerd aan nabije collega’s (bijvoorbeeld:‘Zoals werk van een afstudeerstudent vanBaumeister liet zien …’), waarmee hetboek een wat eenzijdige indruk achter-laat.», «Helaas maakt Baumeister zich netals Freud schuldig aan onwetenschappe-lijke praktijken. Dit is vreemd voor eendoorgewinterde experimentele onder-zoeker. Zo is er de neiging om te genera-liseren van de laboratoriumcontext naarhet echte leven.», «De auteurs beweren dat dit dereden is voor terugval, maar helaas blijftdit wederom bij speculatie.», «Kortom, het boek is vooral interessantals je door de terminologie heen prikt enhet beschouwt als wat het is: een uiteen-zetting van een reeks interessante labo-ratoriumexperimenten naar zelfbeheer-sing en ‘ego-depletion’»

[REVIEW_NO_ACCESS] Rodney L. Bassett, [Journal of Psychology and Christianity](https://search.proquest.com/openview/e4c98bd6a99a3076eeb5ce45f971cfa1)

[NO_SCEDRECO][BOOK_LITRES] -->
1. Баумайстер Рой Ф., Тирни Джон — Сила воли. Возьми свою жизнь под контроль (Эксмо, 2011).pdf

<a id="NR-62"></a>
### NR

<a id="Гуру-4"></a>
#### Гуру

<!--- [NOTE] «Мотивационный гуру». Не нашёл признаков, почему Ларссен не успехмэн. -->
1. [Ларссен Эрик Бертран](https://finansavisen.no/nyheter/arbeidsliv/2020/01/30/7492833/erik-bertrand-larssen-forlater-arctic-min-drom-er-a-lykkes-pa-en-internasjonal-arena) — Без жалости к себе. Раздвинь границы своих возможностей (Манн, Иванов и Фербер, 2016).epub

<a id="Недостоверная-информация-11"></a>
#### Недостоверная информация

<!--- [NOTE] Критика — https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/thicken-your-skin/201505/the-upside-stress-not-really-partial-book-review , https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/mind-reviews-the-upside-of-stress/ .

“I believe she errors here to the point that if the book were a dissertation proposal, a serious criticism would halt it.” Категория «Ad», несмотря на то, Макгонигал — профессиональный учёный. -->
1. [Макгонигал Келли](https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=g0OMhNcAAAAJ) — Сила воли. Как развить и укрепить (Манн, Иванов и Фербер, 2012).pdf

<a id="Саморазвитие-и-нейронауки"></a>
## Саморазвитие и нейронауки

<!--- [INFO] Согласно биографии на собственном сайте, «Ph.D., University of New Mexico, Counseling Psychology; Focus: Clinical and Community Mental Health»

[NOTE][CRIM_SCIENCE_EDITOR] «Научный редактор» — Надежда Никольская, врач высшей категории. Возможно, нарколог Никольская Надежда Викторовна, но более конкретно сказать не могу. -->
1. [Арден Джон Богоссиан](https://drjohnarden.com/bio/) — Укрощение амигдалы и другие инструменты тренировки мозга (Манн, Иванов и Фербер, 2016).epub

<a id="Нейронауки-и-формирование-привычек"></a>
### Нейронауки и формирование привычек

<a id="NR-63"></a>
#### NR

<a id="Непрофессионализм-12"></a>
##### Непрофессионализм

<!--- [NOTE] Не могу ничего нагуглить о японском нейробиологе и нейрохирурге Takashi Tsukiyama; ссылок на источники книга не имеет

[BOOK_SERIES] Японский мозг

[NOTE_FULL_NAME] «Как забыть всё забывать 15 простых привычек, чтобы не искать ключи по всей квартире»
 -->
1. Цукияма Такаси — Как забыть всё забывать (Издательство «Э», 2018).pdf

<a id="Стрессоустойчивость"></a>
## Стрессоустойчивость

<a id="NR-64"></a>
### NR

<a id="Гуру-5"></a>
#### Гуру

<!--- [NOTE] Похоже, что Мельник — успехвумэн, несмотря на учёную степень. С официального сайта “leading authority on women’s nextlevel success” — https://www.sharonmelnick.com/about/ . Из книги — «В качестве главы компании Horizon Point Inc. проводила успешные тренинги для будущих руководителей, топ-менеджеров, специалистов по продажам. Её тренинги по развитию стрессоустойчивости, оказанию влияния и лидерству в условиях стресса пользуются большим спросом среди руководителей разных уровней.»

[NOTE] Биография -->
1. Мельник Шэрон — Стрессоустойчивость. Как сохранять спокойствие и высокую эффективность в любых ситуациях (Манн, Иванов и Фербер, 2014).pdf

<a id="Тренировка-ума"></a>
## Тренировка ума

<a id="NR-65"></a>
### NR

<a id="Непрофессионализм-13"></a>
#### Непрофессионализм

<!--- [NOTE] Не нашёл ничего о научном прошлом Вуджека, зато возглавлял отдел маркетинга, продаж; провёл более 200 программных речей, презентаций и семинаров — https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tom_Wujec#Background_and_career

[BOOK_SERIES] Сам себе психолог

[NO_SCANNED_PDF] -->
1. Вуджек Том — Тренировка ума (Питер, 1996).pdf
<!--- [INFO] Лорейн — профессионал, но об его учёной деятельности информации найти не удалось. В книге рассматривается множество смежных с запоминанием областях.
Ссылки на источники в книге отсутствуют.

[NOTE] Link to Lorayne’s bio

[NO_PDF] -->
1. Лорейн Гарри — Как развить силу ума (Попурри, 2014)

<a id="Развитие-памяти"></a>
### Развитие памяти

<!--- [NOTE] “Seminar Pesentations”, “Director of Training”, “Seminar Instructor”, но нормальные учёные степени тоже есть -->
1. [Арден Джон Богосиан](https://drjohnarden.com/bio/) — Развитие памяти для чайников (Вильямс, 2003).djvu

<a id="Свобода"></a>
# Свобода

<a id="Бегство-от-свободы"></a>
## Бегство от свободы

<!--- [ACADEMIC_DEGREE] Ph.D. from the University of Heidelberg in 1922 — https://www.britannica.com/biography/Erich-Fromm

[POSITIVE_OR_NEUTRAL_REVIEW] Ghislain Deslandes, ESCP Europe Business School — https://sci-hub.se/10.1177/0170840618787166 ; Avihu Zakai, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem — https://sci-hub.se/https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12115-018-0286-2 ; Nidia Elena Ortiz, Simón Puerta-Domínguez, Universidad de Antioquia, Medellín, Colombia — https://revistas.udea.edu.co/index.php/psicologia/article/view/342705/20803241

[BOOK_SERIES] Philosophy

[NO_SCEDRECO][CRIM_OUTDATED][CRIM_NO_REFS] В категорию «философские и публицистические произведения» -->
1. [Фромм Эрих](https://www.britannica.com/biography/Erich-Fromm) — Бегство от свободы. Человек для себя (АСТ, 2006).djvu

<a id="Свобода-воли"></a>
## Свобода воли

<a id="Нейронауки-о-свободе-воли"></a>
### Нейронауки о свободе воли

<!--- [INFO] Газзанига — директор центра изучения разума SAGE

[INFO] Научный редактор — Ольга Игоревна Ивашкина, профильный младший научный сотрудник — https://lomonosov-msu.ru/rus/user/profile/5293 . Это не является научным званием в современной России; категория книге понижена.

[BOOK_SERIES] Corpus scientificum

[NO_PDF] -->
1. [Газзанига Майкл](https://people.psych.ucsb.edu/gazzaniga/michael/) — Кто за главного. Свобода воли с точки зрения нейробиологии (АСТ, Corpus, 2017).epub

<a id="Иллюзия-свободы-воли"></a>
#### Иллюзия свободы воли

<a id="HC-11"></a>
##### HC

<!--- [ACADEMIC_DEGREE] «Sam received (…) a Ph.D. in neuroscience from UCLA» — https://samharris.org/about/

[CRIM_BESTSELLER] «Sam Harris is the author of five New York Times best sellers» — https://samharris.org/about/

[CRIM_SPEAKER] https://www.ted.com/speakers/sam_harris

[POSITIVE_OR_NEUTRAL_REVIEW] Benjamin N. Witts, Todd A. Ward, University of Nevada, Reno — https://sci-hub.se/https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40732-014-0018-y — «However, as will beexplored in more detail, whether the brain’s function is a physiological or psychological process is often confusing. Regardless of the confusion, Harris’s analysis does bring us one step closer to describing the brain as simply an organ», «While Harrisrepeatedly mentions the role that environmental factors mayplay in behavior, seldom is the topic explored in any depth», «Though this illustrates anunderstanding of benefits brought about by renouncing free-dom, behavior analysts tend to delve much deeper into the topic», «and touches upon the issue of rehabilitation via incentives only briefly when Harris (2012b) notes “the logic of punishing people will comeundone—unless we find that punishment is an essential com-ponent of deterrence or rehabilitation” (p. 56). Behavior analysts have something to say about this.», «In addition, Harris omits a discussion of oppressive forceswho can capitalize on an approach to control over others’behavior that still results in what Harris regards as“feelingsof freedom.”», «Through collaborative efforts with individuals such as Har-ris and his colleagues, a more thorough understanding ofbehavior can be had. Such collaborations offer no threat toeither science, and in fact may help to refine both.»

[REVIEW_RETELLING] Gabriel Garmendia da Trindade, University of Birmingham — https://dialnet.unirioja.es/descarga/articulo/6630163.pdf — «Harris compromete-se a abordar a questão do livre-arbítrio sob o prisma das últimas descobertas da neurociência, e é exatamente isso o que ele faz. Apesar da clareza de sua escrita e precisão de seus argumentos, todavia, muitos leitores talvez não se sintam completamente convencidos de que não são os verdadeiros autores de seus pensamentos, intenções e ações. Ainda há muito a ser dito em prol do livre-arbítrio humano. De fato, o debate filosófico sobre o problema aqui tratado é bem mais complexo e amplo do que Harris faz parecer. Por essa razão, interessados na temática em pauta deveriam complementar as provocações levantadas em Free Will com a leitura de outras obras e textos relevantes»

Michael Clayton, Missouri State University — https://sci-hub.se/10.1007/s40614-018-0140-2 — «Although he never cites Skinner’s work,Harris is likely aware of Skinner’s contributions to the discussion of free will, giventhe amount of attention Skinner received at the time. Without the benefit of relying onSkinner’s detailed analysis of free will, Harris presents a case for essentially the sameargument as Skinner’s four decades earlier in an easily readable short book»

[BOOK_OR_AUTHOR_OR_CONCEPT_CRITICISM][REVIEW_LONG][REVIEW_HIGH_ERUDITION] Daniel C. Dennett, Center for Cognitive Studies, Tuft University — https://www.rifp.it/ojs/index.php/rifp/article/download/rifp.2017.0018/777 — «SAM HARRIS’S FREE WILL is a remarkable little book, engagingly written and jargon –free, appealing to reason, not authority, and written withpassion and moral seriousness.», «But some of us have long rec-ognized these points and gone on to adopt more reasonable, more empirically sound, models of decision and thought, and we think we can articulate and defend a moresophisticated model of free will that is not only consistent with neuroscience and intro-spection but also grounds a (modified, toned-down, non-Absolute) variety of responsibility that justifies both praise and blame, reward and punishment.», «Harris, we think, is throwing out the baby with the bathwater», «It is also valuable, as I will show, as a veritable museum of mistakes, none of them new», «Harris has considered compatibilism, at least cursorily, and his opinion of it is breath-takingly dismissive», "This is a low blow, and worse follows: «from both a moral and a scientific perspective, this seems deliberately obtuse»", «he himself is a com-patibilist in everything but name!», «First of all, he doesn’t know this. This is a guess, and suitably expressed questionnaires might well prove him wrong. That is an em-pirical question, and a thoughtful pioneering attempt to answer it suggests that Harris’s guess is simply mistaken.», «Harris’s claim that the folk are mostly in-compatibilists is thus dubious on its face», «I wish Harris had noticed that he con-tradictsthem here, and I’m curious to learn how he proposes to counter my arguments. Another mistake he falls for – in very good company –is the mistake the great J.L. Austin», «One of the effects of Harris’s misconstruing compatibilism is that when he turns to the task of avoiding the dire conclusions of the hard de-terminists, he underestimates his task.», «There are complications with all this, but Harris doesn’t even look at the surfaceof these issues.», «Harris ignores the reflexive, repetitive na-ture of thinking.», «That is simply a bad theory of consciousness», «he has taken on a straw man, and the straw man isbeating him», «Once again, Harris is ig-noring a large and distinguished literature that defends this claim.», «His book also seems to have influenced his own beliefs and desires: writing it has blinded him to alternatives that he really ought to have considered.», «But here again Harris is taking an everyday, folk notion of authorship and inflating it into metaphysical nonsense.», «Somehow Harris has missed one of the deepest points made by Von Neumann and Morgenstern in their introduction to their ground‐breaking 1953 book», «But the idea that all punishment is, in the end, unjustifiable and should be abolished because nobody is ever really responsible, because nobody has “real” free will is not only not supported by science or philosophical argument»

[REVIEW_LONG] John Lemos, Philosophy and Religion Faculty, Coe College — https://www.rifp.it/ojs/index.php/rifp/article/download/rifp.2017.0019/779 — «I argue that while Dennett provides good replies to Harris’ cri-tique of compatibilism, there are deeper prob-lems with Dennett’s view which have been raised poignantly by Bruce Waller. Addition-ally, I contend that the challenges to libertari-an free will voiced by both Harris and Dennett are answerable and in doing so», «Daniel Dennett and I both think this is a bad argument, but we do so for different rea-sons whichreflect our different perspectives on the nature of freewill and moral responsi-bility. As a libertarian, I find Har-ris’ assertion that if our wills are not deter-mined «then they are the product of chance and we are not responsible for them» to be problematic.», «The problem with Harris’s argument here is that the experimental data from Libet and oth-ers have been significantly challenged in the philosophical literature. In Alfred Mele’s Free Will and Luck,23Ch. 2, he clearly demonstrates that Libet’s experiments do not in fact show that all of our actions are causally determined by unconscious neural activity. Libet’s findings are also criticized in Ch. 4 of Mark Balaguer’s Free Will As An Open Scientific Problem.», «For the reasons cited above, we have good reason to believe that Harris’ argument for the view that all human decisions are causally determined by unconscious neural activity is inadequate.», «Harris’ primary concern is how we can be responsible for such SFAs if they are causally undetermined.», «Harris’ rejection of the libertarian approach to understanding free will and moral responsi-bility is overly brief. Were he to make a convincing case for rejecting such an approach, he would need to engage the kinds of issues I raise here and engage the abundant literature in which these ideas and arguments have been made.»

[ADDITIONAL_READING] Mele Alfred — «Free. Why Science Hasn’t Disproved Free Will»; Mele, Alfred R.; Vohs, Kathleen D.; Baumesteir, Roy F. — «Free will and consciousness: an introduction and overview of perspectives»; Bruce N. Waller — «Against Moral Responsibility»

Robert Kane — «The Oxford Handbook of Free Will» — «A segunda edição do The Oxford Handbook of Free Will conta com vinte e nove artigos elaborados por alguns dos maiores especialistas da atualidade sobre a questão do livre-arbítrio. As quase setecentas páginas dessa coletânea cobrem todos os tópicos discutidos por Harris em Free Will e muitos outros mais (e.g. a relação entre livre-arbítrio e o sentido da vida; e livre-arbítrio e identidade pessoal).» — https://dialnet.unirioja.es/descarga/articulo/6630163.pdf#page=5

[NO_SCEDRECO]
 -->
1. Харрис Сэм — Свобода воли, которой не существует (Альпина Паблишер, 2015).pdf

<a id="Свобода-слова"></a>
## Свобода слова

<a id="Защита-свободы-слова"></a>
### Защита свободы слова

<a id="Ревизионистский-либерализм"></a>
#### Ревизионистский либерализм

<!--- [Is/Mono]

[ACADEMIC_DEGREE] [Academia.edu personal account, CV](https://newcastleuni.academia.edu/RussellBlackford/CurriculumVitae) — «Ph.D. in English literature – University of Newcastle (supervisor Norman Talbot).», «Ph.D. in philosophy – Monash University (supervisor Justin Oakley)»

[NO_SCEDRECO]

[REVIEW_CHECK] 2021-8-16

[POSITIVE_OR_NEUTRAL_REVIEW][CRIM_THEOLOGY] Bruce Kaye, Centre for Public and Contextual Theology, Charles Sturt University, Canberra, [Journal of Anglican Studies](https://sci-hub.se/10.1017/S1740355319000305) — «Mill’s essay On Liberty is a constant companion throughout this book and Blackford is respectful, though not uncritical, of his literary conversationalist. That interaction is conducted in somewhat personal terms and has the tone of a friendly conversation and indirectly is a model of Blackford’s general thesis about argument.», «This is a book worthy of careful attention from Anglicans around the world»

Daniel A. Kaufman, professor of philosophy at Missouri State University, [The Philosophers’ Magazine](https://archive.philosophersmag.com/the-tyranny-of-opinion-conformity-and-the-future-of-liberalism-a-review/) — «Russell Blackford is shaping up to be one of our great public philosophers, helping to bridge the space between academic inquiry and public discourse. The Tyranny of Opinion perfectly negotiates this territory, in that it is thorough and rigorous in its treatment of the subject, just shy of what would be required for a purely academic monograph, while also being accessible even to a moderately educated audience. In this regard, it is a perfect example of public philosophy done at its highest levels, something which we all very much need in these increasingly contentious, fractious times.»

[REVIEW_IN_MEDIA] Russell Whitehouse, [International Policy Digest](https://intpolicydigest.org/book-review-the-tyranny-of-opinion/) — «I wish Blackford had written more about how PC affects academic research.», «I also wish Blackford had conducted some research into the quantitative, as opposed to qualitative, reach of PC attitudes across society. Due to the media’s frenzy in reporting incidences of PC on (mostly elite, blue-state) college campuses, the problem may seem much larger than it really is.», «The Tyranny of Opinion is a very impartial book on the implications of political correctness in a free society.», «The book does a good job at exposing the illiberalism of both liberal and conservative social justice warriors. Through historical and empirical analysis, the book both prescribes the dangers of self-censorship in society and offers reasonable solutions. Anyone who has felt chills after watching a news story about crazy SJWs on a college campus or witnessing a PC mob on Twitter should read this book for a more nuanced understanding of political correctness and the 1st Amendment, in general.»

[BOOK_OR_AUTHOR_OR_CONCEPT_CRITICISM] Norbert Campagna, Université du Luxembourg, [Ethical Perspectives](https://poj.peeters-leuven.be/secure/POJ/downloadpdf.php?ticket_id=607d1789d0af1#page=3) — «Had Blackford read Tocqueville’s Democracy in America, he would have seen that the French thinker had precisely insisted on this point, writing, among other things, that in the United States, public opinion was much more efficient than the Inquisition had been in Europe.», «I would rather say that the book illustrates with contemporary examples ideas that can already be found in Tocqueville. I cannot really find anything new or original in the book, and I wonder how Peter Boghossian could call it ‘a masterpiece’ to be read by ‘every university professor’ (cover page)», «This does not mean that it is a bad book. (…) Someone who is familiar with the problems discussed in the book will not see his or her thought-horizon extended. But he or she will nevertheless be glad to see that there are still some persons who are not afraid to openly oppose those in their own camp and to fight intolerance wherever it may come from.», «In this context, one would have wished that Blackford had been more careful himself and had thought twice before writing that abortion or physician-assisted suicide are today not opposed by ‘liberals of any kind’ (197). Taking account of the complexities of these questions in an equally complex society, one can be a liberal and find plausible reasons to reduce abortion and physician-assisted suicide to a minimum. In refusing to admit that one can be a liberal and nevertheless oppose physician-assisted suicide or abortion – though not with the penalization of the woman who has recourse to it, nor of the doctor who practices it – Blackford practices a politics of exclusion or stigmatization, which he criticizes all through the book.», «To conclude: the book may be useful for students who want to have a brief and clear exposition of Mill’s main ideas about freedom of speech and for those who want to find examples for the intolerance of the Left»

[REVIEW_NO_ACCESS] Ronald A. Lindsay, [Free Inquiry](https://secularhumanism.org/2019/10/the-tyranny-of-opinion-conformity-and-the-future-of-liberalism/)

[NO_PDF] -->
1. Blackford Russell — The Tyranny of Opinion꞉ Conformity and the Future of Liberalism (Bloomsbury Publishing, 2018).epub

<a id="Политкорректность"></a>
### Политкорректность

<a id="NR-66"></a>
#### NR

<a id="Недостоверная-информация-12"></a>
##### Недостоверная информация

<!--- [ACADEMIC_DEGREE] Доктор философских наук ВШЭ

[BOOK_CITATIONS] «Будет одно мнение — мнение ортодоксии, с возмущением отвергающей неуважительное отношение к «братьям меньшим» из южных республик.», «Но существуют и сравнительно новые абсурды, порожденные идеологией политкорректности в ее зрелом современном состоянии. Например, подведение под одну категорию, то есть фактическое признание равенства, как в правовом, так и во всех прочих отношениях классической разнополой и гомосексуальной семьи. В некоторых кантонах Швейцарии даже заключаются церковные гомосексуальные браки.»

[FAKE] «и в феминистских кругах было предложено отказаться от унижающего абстрактное человеческое достоинство понятия «женщина» и по аналогии с афроамериканцем именовать женщину «вагинальным американцем» (vaginal americain)» — https://zen.yandex.ru/media/chaskor/slovar-feminizma-5c98f8b60b19fb00b30c9282

[FAKE] «Мы встречаем теперь в прессе сообщения том, что в той или другой стране официально отказались от обозначения супругов как «муж» и «жена», а родителей как «мать» и «отец», они стали называться «первый родитель» и «второй родитель» (хотя непонятно, как можно в политкорректном мире прибегать к такой неэгалитарной, недемократической терминологии).» — https://meduza.io/cards/putin-skazal-chto-poka-on-prezident-roditeli-1-i-2-ne-zamenyat-mamu-i-papu-a-chto-gde-to-takoe-pravda-est

[BOOK_SUPPORT] https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/politkorrektnost-postmodern-i-neotraybalizm-sotsiologicheskiy-vzglyad-na-ideologiyu-instrumenty-i-posledstviya-vosstaniya-menshinstv

[BOOK_SCEDRECO] В книге не указана информация о рецензентах

[ADDITIONAL_READING] D.A. Carson — The Intolerance of Tolerance

Ильинская Светлана Геннадьевна — Толерантность как принцип политического действия

McKinnon, Catriona — Toleration: a critical introduction

Catriona Mckinnon, Dario Castiglione — Toleration, Neutrality and Democracy

[BOOK_SERIES] Библиотека журнала Логос

[CRIM] Беспристрастность. «К каждой проблеме есть только один правильный подход, других толкований нет» — а у самого один подход -->
1. [Ионин Леонид Григорьевич](https://www.hse.ru/org/persons/206232) — Политкорректность. Дивный новый мир (Ад Маргинем Пресс, 2012).pdf

<a id="Семья"></a>
# Семья

<a id="Домашнее-насилие"></a>
## Домашнее насилие

<a id="Домашнее-насилие-над-женщинами"></a>
### Домашнее насилие над женщинами

<a id="Неофеминистская-критика-карцерального-феминизма"></a>
#### Неофеминистская критика карцерального феминизма

<!--- [ACADEMIC_DEGREE] [University of Colorado Law School, Boulder, CV](https://lawweb.colorado.edu/files/vitae/gruber.pdf) — “Harvard Law School, JD, 1997”

[Kr/ArS]

[REVIEW_CHECK] 2021-8-1

[POSITIVE_OR_NEUTRAL_REVIEW][REVIEW_LONG] Isy India Thusi, Associate Professor of Law, Delaware Law School, [Harvard Law Review](https://harvardlawreview.org/2021/05/feminist-scripts-for-punishment/) — «This book invites feminists to interrogate foundational questions about the methods and goals of feminism and to reevaluate the dominant feminist script, which has advanced the goal of punishment over improving the material conditions of women.», «Therefore, Gruber’s suggestion to look beyond the criminal system for justice is not a utopian ideal that ignores the importance of accountability (pp. 197–99). It is a matter of necessity for the poor, immigrant, Indigenous, and disabled women who live in fear of the criminal system and the surveillance and violence that it constantly brings within their lives.», «Therefore, Gruber’s suggestion to look beyond the criminal system for justice is not a utopian ideal that ignores the importance of accountability (pp. 197–99). It is a matter of necessity for the poor, immigrant, Indigenous, and disabled women who live in fear of the criminal system and the surveillance and violence that it constantly brings within their lives.», «The Feminist War on Crime is a timely call for feminists to reckon with the harms of the criminal institutions they helped to build.»

[BOOK_OR_AUTHOR_OR_CONCEPT_CRITICISM][REVIEW_HIGH_ERUDITION][REVIEW_SMASHER] Dianne L. Post, International Human Rights Attorney, [Dignity: A Journal on Sexual Exploitation and Violence](https://digitalcommons.uri.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1247&context=dignity) — «Unfortunately, the solutions they propose will solve nothing and help no one», «We need to attack the root of the problem, not resurrect a failed regimen that offered no protection for women and no accountability for abusers.», «The Feminist War on Crime (2020) is more nuanced and admits that there were several different strands of “feminism” often at odds but then blames the losers of those arguments for outcomes the author doesn’t like.», «She makes statistical claims that are not supported by the evidence», «Gruber writes that the First Wave feminists were racist and blames them for much of society’s ills though they were not in power. She gives them no credit for what they did achieve», «Contrary to the author’s claim, historically, courts did not believe women», «The book’s thesis does what she accuses others of doing—reducing complex issues to simple ones.», «Much of the book’s arguments are made up of misattribution and the blame game. Throughout western Christian history women have been blamed for everything since Eve in the Bible. But again, as in the Goodmark book, religion is not mentioned as a site of discrimination, patriarchy, or the abuse against women.», «Not to be left out, Gruber attacks millennials too. Allegedly the campus rape explosion is just another panic and added to mass incarceration. Far more sympathy is expressed for the accused males than for the female victims who might, she writes, be making false allegations.», «Keeping the abuse private as these two books urge is exactly the wrong move.», «Gruber joins the men whining that #MeToo has gone too far. However, when one side has been used to getting all the advantages, equality feels oppressive.», «In The Feminist War on Crime, rape is trivialized especially in suggestions that date rape is not “real rape.” Now it can be called noninjurious rape.», «The now thoroughly debunked Freudian idea that women fantasize rape is mentioned as it is that “rape culture” is a figment of feminist imagination.», «the author still makes statements such as, “Arrest became the official feminist position…” There is no such thing as an official feminist position—now or then.», «The author’s conclusion suggests a program not grounded in any reality.», «She clearly does not want to name those who are doing the harm but has no problem asking the victims to let it all go.», «You cannot focus on a problem without naming the problem and insisting on accountability for the perpetrators.», «Women who carry water for the patriarchy just so they can have a slightly longer leash and stand a few rungs up in oppression from other women, particularly marginalized women, make me a special kind of angry. Being a master’s favorite dog is still having a master and being a dog.»

[REVIEW_NO_ACCESS] Caitlin Reed Wiesner, [Feminist Formations](https://muse.jhu.edu/article/793681/summary)

[REVIEW_NO_ACCESS] Guy Hamilton-Smith, [Law & Society Review](https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/lasr.12540)

[NOTE_FULL_NAME] Gruber Aya — The Feminist War on Crime꞉ The Unexpected Role Of Women’s Liberation In Mass Incarceration (University of California Press, 2020)

[BOOK_SAME] Имеется Scribd-версия данной книги в формате epub. Также представлена одноимённая диссертация 2007 года.

-->
1. Gruber Aya — The Feminist War on Crime (University of California Press, 2020).epub

<a id="Подход-антиэссенциалистского-феминизма-к-насилию-над-женщинами"></a>
#### Подход антиэссенциалистского феминизма к насилию над женщинами

<!--- [ACADEMIC_DEGREE] [University of Baltimore, CV](http://www.law.ubalt.edu/downloads/law_downloads/CV.Goodmark_S10.pdf) — «Stanford Law School, Stanford, California; Juris Doctor Conferred with Distinction, June 1994»

[REVIEW_CHECK] 2021-7-15

[POSITIVE_OR_NEUTRAL_REVIEW][REVIEW_RETELLING] Llana Carroll, New York University, [Women’s Studies](https://sci-hub.se/10.1080/00497878.2013.747387) — «it isan effective strategy, one that makes Goodmark’s criticism of thecurrent legal system convincing», «While I value Goodmark’s ambitious proposal for overhaul-ing the domestic violence legal system, I wonder if her finalrecommendation might be overly hopeful: would truth commis-sions work broadly in the United States where we are used to amuch different domestic violence legal system? Can a physicallyand psychologically abused woman always act in her own bestinterest, and define and seek justice for herself? Maybe. But thepsychoanalytic theorists who Goodmark only glosses in chapterthree might suggest otherwise»

[REVIEW_RETELLING] Robert Costello, Criminal Justice Department, State University of New York, [Sociological Forum](https://sci-hub.se/10.1111/socf.12028) — «This book is a sterlingexample of that work and offers far more, as Goodmark adeptly infuses history,public policy, legal cases, and social science in her analysis of domestic violenceand the legal system, thereby successfully and effectively producing an interdisci-plinary examination.», «Spread over eight chapters, this book provides a complete overview of the subject», «As a novice to both feminist theory and domestic violence law, I found theIntroduction especially helpful, as it succinctly explained how laws protectingabused women derived from feminist activists who subscribed to a prevailingideology of the 1980s and 1990s when such laws were enacted called dominancefeminism.», «This chapter highlights one of the key strengths of the book, which ishow chapters are formatted. In the first half of each chapter, Goodmark showsan impressive ability to summarize complex social science research findings fromclassical studies with clear connections and examples of the legal response todomestic violence.», «The second half of each chapter discusses how the researchcommunity has produced additional findings over the ensuing years, but withoutany change to or impact on the laws, thus highlighting their weaknesses andshortcomings.», «The effect of this format combined with excellent writing skills produces anengrossing and educational read.», «This gives readers a con-crete and thought-provoking alternative to the current domestic violenceapproach.», «I plan on assigning this book to my graduate class in Criminology and rec-ommend it for other graduate-level classes in various disciplines concerned withdomestic violence.»

Aya Gruber, University of Colorado Law School, “Rethinking Domestic Violence, Rethinking Violence”, [Jotwell](https://scholar.law.colorado.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1076&context=articles) — «I have sought out scholarship that neither repeats the battered womenadvocates' mantra that there should be "zero tolerance" for gender crime, nor holds to liberal ideals thatinstinctively prioritize "neutral" (defendants') rights.», «The book ismeticulous in its research, spanning decades of historical developments in the law of intimate abuse. It bringstogether many strains of feminist and criminal law theory to formulate a comprehensive re-envisioning of thedomestic violence law reform project.», «the book makes a compelling case that dominance feminism-type ideas were highly influential inthe domestic violence arena», «Thus, I appreciate the book's potential to illuminate connections between the trajectory of domestic violence reform andgreater hegemonic forces in the U.S. carceral state.», «One of my favorite parts of the book is when it describes how relationships with violencemight not be abusive and certain abusive relationships may not involve violence.», «One of my favorite parts of the book is when it describes how relationships with violencemight not be abusive and certain abusive relationships may not involve violence.», «But the book will appeal to more than just post-modem andsociological critics of penal authority. This "antiessentialist" book is essential reading for anyone interested inunderstanding the politics, policies, laws, and history of intimate abuse in late modem America»

[Is/Mass]

[NO_SCEDRECO] -->
1. Goodmark Leigh Suzanne — A Troubled Marriage꞉ Domestic Violence and the Legal System (NYU Press, 2012).pdf

<a id="Семьи-аккордеоны"></a>
## Семьи-аккордеоны

<!--- [ACADEMIC_DEGREE] [Program in Law and Public Affairs, Princeton University, CV](https://lapa.princeton.edu/sites/default/files/faculty_newman_cv.pdf) — «1979 — Ph.D. in Anthropology University of California, Berkeley»

[NO_SCEDRECO]

[REVIEW_CHECK] 2021-7-5

[POSITIVE_OR_NEUTRAL_REVIEW] Karrie Ann Snyder, Northwestern University, [Contemporary Sociology: A Journal of Reviews](https://sci-hub.se/10.1177/0094306114539455mm) — «Newman’s book will hopefully expand our discussions of emerging adulthood beyond the typical cultural discussion of how adulthood is different today, to why and how adult pathways are evolving in the face of globalization and the consequences for young people’s sense of self, career aspirations, and road to independence.»

Frances K. Goldscheider, University of Maryland, [American Journal of Sociology](https://sci-hub.se/10.1086/667780) — «I think this analysis would have been much stronger ifthe question of remaining or coming home were treated more broadly.», «have to go there, they have to take you in”(Robert Frost,“The Death of theHired Man”). I would have liked the design to include some “black sheep,” perhaps by interviewing young adults living independently and askingthem questions about how they would feel about moving home after col-lege, if they lost a job or their coresidential relationship ended, and whetherthey would or would not. Parents of non-coresident young adults couldhave also been asked the same questions. These additions would have madepossible a much richer analysis.», «Further, I was somewhat shocked at the treatment of the two Scandina-vian countries. Newman describes them as being low on familism (particu-larly in comparison with Italy), with numerous quotes about how rarelyparents and young adults who are not coresident see each other, given theother priorities in their busy lives. Her major sources appear to be the Wal-lender mysteries and those about computer geeks with dragon tattoos.», «She evenfinds quotes that allow her to develop an argument that extensive parent-adult child coresidence, given the latter’sfinancial dependence, is a“goodthing.”I doubt that she would make the same argument for the warmth-generating effects offinancial dependence for traditional married women», «Nevertheless, this is an interesting, provocative analysis, putting in sharprelief a set of highly industrialized countries with very different historiesand cultures but whose citizens are dealing not just with issues that areglobal but also relationships that are eternally human (the intergenerational relationship). It is clearly written and fully accessible to both undergraduateand graduate students, who willfind the issues of deep theoretical and personal interest, and raises issues about the changing transition to adulthood that we hope, eventually, to understand from all sides of the elephant.»

Zachary Prout, a senior finance major at the Zarb School of Business, Hofstra University, [Regional Labor Review](https://www.hofstra.edu/pdf/academics/colleges/hclas/cld/cld-rlr-sp15-prout-accordion-families.pdf) — «and The Accordion Family does not disappoint», «Katherine Newman does an excellent job of mostly relaying the information and personal testimonies she uncovered in a widely accessible manner while keeping her personal judgments separate.», «However, in each chapter’s conclusion and at the book’s end, she allows the reader a glimpse of her own perspective and of the policy changes she favors. I really enjoyed this style of presentation. It allows the reader to interpret the research in their own way, but then also examine the thoughts of the investigator.», «It is clear, though, that Newman has her own strong, relatively left-wing beliefs about the current state of the global economy», «She feels that with increased government spending on struggling youth, real change that is tangible and measurable will come about. The free market will simply not right itself in this case.», «The only conclusion readers are left with about accordion families is that their continued growth may have unforeseen economic consequences, but the range of public support they can count on may not be sustainable for long.»

[REVIEW_ONE_PAGE][REVIEW_RETELLING] 小山泰代, [人口問題研究](http://www.ipss.go.jp/syoushika/bunken/data/pdf/20263706.pdf) — «本書を通じて，社会的連帯の再構築においては，長期的視野と多様な選択肢が重要であることを再認識させられる．そのためには長らく社会に定着してきた家族に対する規範にとらわれないことが鍵となろう.»

[REVIEW_NO_ACCESS] Joshua Wakeham, [The Hedgehog Review](https://go.gale.com/ps/anonymous?id=GALE|A323144491)

Bérangère Véron, [Revue française de sociologie](https://www.jstor.org/stable/24382354)

阪井 裕一郎, [家計経済研究](https://ci.nii.ac.jp/naid/40020074222)

[Is/Mass]

[NO_PDF] -->
1. Newman Katherine S. — The Accordion Family꞉ Boomerang Kids, Anxious Parents, and the Private Toll of Global Competition (Beacon Press, 2013).epub

<a id="Традиционные-семейные-ценности"></a>
## Традиционные семейные ценности

<a id="История-противодействия-сторонников-сохранения-семьи-безопасности-женщин-и-детей"></a>
### История противодействия сторонников сохранения семьи безопасности женщин и детей

<a id="HC-12"></a>
#### HC

<!--- [ACADEMIC_DEGREE] [Unversty of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Department of History, CV](https://view.officeapps.live.com/op/view.aspx?src=https%3A%2F%2Fhistory.illinois.edu%2Fsites%2Fdefault%2Ffiles%2Fcv%2Fepleck_CV.doc) — «Brandeis University, Ph.D., 1973, History of American Civilization»

[NO_SCEDRECO]

[REVIEW_CHECK] 2021-7-13

[POSITIVE_OR_NEUTRAL_REVIEW][REVIEW_ONE_PAGE] Richard J. Gelles, University of Rhode Island, [Social Science Quarterly](https://sci-hub.se/10.2307/42862416) — « Historical analysis of family violence and social policy against violence in the home is not new. There have been a number of chapters and articles published in the last twenty years which review some of the historical evidence.», «None of the previous historical analyses of the making of a social policy against family violence have been as comprehensive, thorough, or valuable as Elizabeth Pleck's effort in Domestic Tyranny. First, Pieck, unlike most other students of domestic violence, examines violence toward children and women. Second, she covers making social policy from the Plymouth Colony of the 1630s until the Domestic Violence Prevention and Treatment Act of the early 1980s», «There are places in the volume when the reader may be overwhelmed with documentation and facts. Other times, the reader is left wanting more analysis and synthesis from the author.», «Although the individual chapters are masterfully organized, the book seems to lack an overarching theme.», «It might seem that efforts throughout history to develop social policies against family violence had common threads running through them.», «Such threads (such as the sanctity and privacy of the family serving to block policy efforts) are only briefly alluded to by Pieck.», «Pieck and her book, however, deserve only praise. She has provided us with a valuable and most readable book. She has carefully avoided the ideological minefield which other students of family violence often wander into. Domestic Tyranny sets current research and policy efforts into an appropriate historical context, and the book should stand as a classic in the field.»

[REVIEW_RETELLING] Steven Mintz, University of Houston, [Journal of Social History](https://sci-hub.se/10.2307/3787553) — «In her pioneering study of American attitudes toward family violence, Elizabeth Pleck shows that it is possible to inject a much-needed historical dimension into discussion of child abuse and wife battering», «Her discussion of the case records would have been enriched had she described more actual incidents of family violence and system? atically analyzed her statistical findings and presented the results in tabular form.»

David J. Pivar, California State University, Fullerton, [The Pennsylvania Magazine of History and Biography](https://journals.psu.edu/pmhb/article/download/44363/44084#page=6) — «The discovery and recovery of the historical information that makes up thishistory is in itself a major accomplishment.», «Overall, Pleck's analysisis good, though dating of Freudianism's influence from the 1930s seems alittle late. Freud's ideas influenced reformers even before they became partof therapy. Pleck also overlooks the importance of Havelock Ellis's viewson sado-masochistic gender relations and their influence on the earlierdevelopment of reform.», «Pleck's writing of history is greatly influenced by her feminist socialcriticism. Her presentism seems, in some ways, to make her write historybackwards.», «Pleck focuses narrowly upon remedial reforms. Her research adds muchto our knowledge of this limited subject, but she misses, with some frequency,relationships among reforms. This criticism is truer for the earlier part ofher study than the latter.», «On theoccasion of the bicentennial of the U.S. Constitution, Elizabeth Pleck findsthe family not always the cradle of freedom and liberty»

Lee H. Bowker, Humboldt State University, [Contemporary Sociology](https://sci-hub.se/10.2307/2073985) — «In a very well-written and clearly organized volume, she points out that the current manifestation of resistance to the abuse of wives and their children is actually the third wave of social action against family violence.», «Elizabeth Pleck's grasp of feminist history is sound, and her use of historical source materials is admirable. Particularly valuable are her detailed appendices on the patterns of childhood punishment from 1650 to 1900 and changes in the incidence of family murder between the thirteenth century in England and contemporary America», «Domestic Tyranny makes excellent reading for scholars who are interested in the history of the family in America, family violence, the oppression of women, or the cultural redefinition of certain conditions as social problems», «Its only defect is that the analysis and generalizations contained in the introduction and the epilogue should be developed in greater depth»

Nancy Tomes, Department of History, State University of New York, [Science](https://sci-hub.se/10.1126/science.238.4834.1738) — «While stating her own convictions clearly, Pleck is scrupulously fair in assessing the motives and accomplishments of past reformers and avoids simplistic dichotomies between the goals of humanitarianism and social control. Her work also possesses the great merit of incorporating legal developments with the history of welfare and reform.», «But readers should be forewarned that this is indeed a study of social policy toward family violence, and not an analysis of its causes. Pleck rarely speculates on why domestic abuse occurs, but rather concentrates on how society responded to that violence in its moral and legal codes.», «Her data suggest that the rates for family murder began to rise in the 19th century and have increased rapidly in the 20th century. These figures seem to contradict Pleck's assertion that "reform against family violence has mainly occurred as a response to social and political conditions, or social movements, rather than to worsening conditions in the home"», «The devastating consequences of the current "epidemic" of family violence makes Pleck's analysis all the more timely. Her thoroughly researched and carefully argued study should be required reading for all those concerned with the problem today.»

[REVIEW_RETELLING] Marcia Bedard, Women's Studies, California State University, [NWSA Journal](https://sci-hub.se/10.2307/4316050) — «These histories are important because the family violence literature has focused primarily on the most recent wave of reform efforts. Pleck provides a broad historical overview», «Both authors use social casework records and other primary sources to construct rich histories of the politics of family violence, integrating earlier feminist analyses into their work. The two books exemplify meticulous and original scholarship, providing valuable resources for teaching and research. These books would be particularly appropriate for social work and criminology courses, and would also be useful for teaching the history of American family life, the social construction of motherhood, and any upper-level course on family violence.»

[REVIEW_ONE_PAGE] Jan Faulkner, Family Court Services, Oakland, California, [Affilia](https://sci-hub.se/10.1177/088610999000500118) — «This book should be required reading for undergraduate and graduatestudents who are preparing for a career in social work, psychology,psychiatry, medicine, law, and women’s studies. The author provides asolid foundation, based on historical facts and research data, for a work-ing frame of reference to understand the psychosocial/legal implicationsof domestic violence in Western society, especially the United States.», «The author’s broad definition of domestic violence results in spottyreading. The content vacillates from the oppression of women to theoppression and needs of children.», « As a reader, I was forced to reflect onthe dramatic effect that physical abuse and oppression have on society ingeneral.», «However, she fails to reflect on the racial polarity of these groups andomits significant data regarding domestic violence among people of color.», «This book contains documented data plus many little-known facts aboutthe customs and mores that have been affected by domestic violence.»

[REVIEW_ONE_PAGE] Norma Basch, Rutgers University Newark, [The Journal of American History](https://sci-hub.se/10.2307/1894414) — «In this comprehensive survey of social policies against family violence», «The bold chronological sweep of the book, moreover, is a welcome departure from most studies in the field», «Domestic Tyranny, however, is not always convincing in its delineation of periods of activity and apathy. Consequently it founders on the very periodization that informs so much of the analysis. Although tables and footnotes indicate that Pleck drew on a wealth of secondary and primary sources, including numerous firsthand accounts of childhood punishment between 1650 and 1899, that material is not integrated successfully into the text», «Nevertheless, this book merits the attention of both social historians and contemporary reformers. It is in every sense a pioneering work that not only raises provocative questions about the nature and scope of family violence but also probes the inherent difficulties in shaping remedies.»

[REVIEW_ONE_PAGE] Michael Grossberg, Case Western Reserve University, [The American Historical Review](https://sci-hub.se/10.2307/1863661) — «Elizabeth Pleck has written the first book-length historical analysis of American family violence.», «Obviously, the history of American family violence is far too enormous and complex to be assessed thoroughly in such a slim volume. The critique is predictable: too many contentions left undeveloped; too many issues raised but not pursued.», «Pleck champions concerted state action as the most effective means of reducing family violence and aiding its victims. Yet her argument is merely suggestive because she does not fully explore the interconnections of familialism and antistatism nor fully answer the arguments of those who oppose state intervention.», «Such caveats ought not to diminish Pleck’s achievement. She has insightfully opened up a new historical domain and provided an invaluable starting point for reexamining family violence policies. Most important, as a historian she documents the constant interconnections of the past and present. Her book makes it clear that family violence has a history that must be understood to realize a different future.»

[REVIEW_ONE_PAGE] Cherry Good, University of Essex, [Journal of American Studies](https://sci-hub.se/10.1017/S0021875800019708) — «Pleck's book provides a timely and thought-provoking insight into theimplications of America's public policy on domestic violence»

[REVIEW_ONE_PAGE] Phyllis Palmer, [American Studies International](https://sci-hub.se/10.2307/41278969) — «These chapters point up the difficulties of contemporary history; they recount legislative action instead of using the personal, literary, and institutional accounts that enliven the earlier chapters», «She succeeds admirably»

[REVIEW_HIGH_ERUDITION] E. Wayne Carp, Pacific Lutheran University, [Journal of Policy History](https://sci-hub.se/10.1017/S0898030600004851) — «Domestic Tyranny is a tour de force. In an age of specialized monographsand ideological polarization, one marvels at Pleck's breadth of knowledge,depth of original research, and balanced approach, the result of which isthe virtual creation of a new subfield of family history.», «A final "lesson" of Pleck's work, which she ignores in herfinal paragraph, is the counterproductive effect radical feminism has hadon the movement to reform family violence.», «By showing us the world of Realpolitik in which policy decisions aremade, Pleck offers a sobering view of the past, one with many implica-tions for the future. We ignore it at our peril.»

[REVIEW_PERSONAL_COMMENTS] Рецензия ссылается на представительницу паранауки Юлию Кристеву

[BOOK_OR_AUTHOR_OR_CONCEPT_CRITICISM] Mark Poster, University of California, Irvine, [Signs](https://sci-hub.se/10.2307/3174672) — «Elizabeth Pleck, in Domestic Tyranny, provides an excellent account of how child abuse was established as a public policy issue only in the 1960s, while wife beating did not achieve similar recognition until the 1970s», «The book is comprehensive, well-written, and ably researched.», «Despite the considerable achievements of Domestic Tyranny, Pleck leaves the disturbing impression that violence is somehow a single coherent phenomenon», «But different family structures elicit different patterns and rates of violence against women and children. Families are places of conflict no less than workplaces and political centers, but families structure authority by age and gender, rather than by class or ethnicity», «There can be no single history of violence and the reform of violence because violence is structurally different in different family types», «The Family Ideal, or privacy, however, was not a universal value across classes or across time; it was the particular value of the middle class beginning only in the eighteenth century. Thus, changes in family structures should be reflected in a changing history, or several histories, of wife and child abuse.», «Pleck's definition of violence is also problematic», «but she adds that "spanking, slapping, and emotional neglect do not [constitute violence]" (4). Why not consider these impositions of dominance to be violence?», «In any case, violence is not some a priori, fixed entity but is culturally relative.», «The main failure of this otherwise useful study is that it fails to contribute to a feminist definition of violence, one that goes as far as possible in rejecting acts of domination, one that might serve as a focus for new reform movements, one that might discover a form of violence in domestic privacy itself»

[REVIEW_SEMI] Steven Ruggles, University of Minnesota, [The Journal of Interdisciplinary History](https://sci-hub.se/10.2307/203978) — «The book's descriptions of nineteenthand twentieth-century institutional responses to family violence are particularly strong. In addition, Pleck provides compelling criticisms of the existing literature on the history of childhood and social welfare.», «Pleck's analysis of changing behavior is less satisfactory than her discussion of the reformers. To assess long-term changes in the level of family violence, she relies heavily on the "family homicide rate," a measure of murders of family members based on records of indictments or crime reports. There are serious problems of comparability with this measure, problems that Pleck dismisses too lightly.», «Moreover, the data that do exist are mishandled. For example, Pleck's image of domestic tranquility in seventeenth-century Massachusetts Bay is supported by its extremely low family homicide rate of 0.3 per oo00,000. But the number of indictments for family murder noted in the text is considerably lower than the number that appears in her source; the problem of undercount is compounded by her use of an inappropriate denominator.», «For the second half of the nineteenth century, only io percent of Pleck's sources mention spanking, and 75 percent of them mention hitting with an instrument. None of the differences between periods are statistically significant. If anything, the data suggest the possibility that there was little or no change in this type of punishment between the late eighteenth century and the late nineteenth century, a finding that would be at odds with much of the literature on the history of childhood.», «We should not take the data relating to child punishment or family homicide too seriously. Because of the limitations of the available evidence, I doubt that we will ever be able to chart changes in the levels of family violence with any degree of certainty.»

Holly Brewer, University of California, Los Angeles, [UCLA Historical Journal](https://escholarship.org/content/qt4854z5n6/qt4854z5n6.pdf) — «Her survey in this respect seems fairly comprehensive.», «Pleck's work is also important because of her ability to synthesize larger intellectual trends with laws and court decisions.», «The very strength with which Pleck makes her main argument, however, leads to the major flaw that I find with her work. With some exceptions, such as her discussion of the effect of Freud's theories, Pleck seems determined to see history in Whiggish terms (to see our American laws and institutions as slowly evolving as we become more and more aware of child/wife abuse) that this sometimes distorts her interpretation, or at least leads her not to question missing information.», «Pleck discounts, for example, Pollack’'s finding that none of the Puritan diarists mention spanking their children, as insignificant, concluding that they would not mention the physical punishment of their children in their diaries or that those who spanked their children would be the least likely to have kept diaries.», «On the whole, one is left with a sense that while Pollack’'s synthesis is important and instructive, it could leave the reader with more questions: she seems to assume that where the research has not been done there is no data--yet there are many gaps in the research on this subject. This seems especially obvious with respect to the earlier period, with which she seems much less familiar with than the later period.», «The only studies done with respect to public policy towards abuse prior to the early nineteenth century concern the early Puritans. Is her conclusion that Puritans were unique in attempting to regulate abusive behavior therefore correct? Shouldn't she have examined laws from other colonies, or at least acknowledged this gap in the literature?»

Kathleen J. Ferraro, Associate Professor of Justice Studies at Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, “Review Essay: Culture, Feminism, and Male Violence” [Social Juctice](https://sci-hub.se/10.2307/29766558) — «books reviewed here make important contributions to the theorization of male violence by providing historic, methodological, semiotic, and policy analyses.», «However, the problems outlined above are evident in these books as well. There is ambivalence, obfuscation, or disregard of the state. Racial and cultural differences are rarely noted. White, Western, developed nations are uncritically accepted as the universal paradigm of male dominance and female subordination. The valuable insights contained in each of these books must thus be read with attention to the silences created by these exclusions.», «Elizabeth Pleck’s Domestic Tyranny is a meticulous, scholarly effort», «One of the disappointing aspects of Pleck’s analysis is her failure to identify the differences between the ideology of family integrity regarding children as opposed to women.», «In this statement, Pleck reveals the constrained feminism that pervades her analysis. She presents the facts of family-violence history from a feminist perspective, but maintains a scholar’s restraint, rather than developing  more radical or creative interpretation of her data. This restraint diminishes the potential theoretical contribution of her insights.», «Although this example supports Pleck’s view of the role of the Family Ideal in issues regarding women, an analysis of policies regarding children reveals a different story.», «Pleck does not emphasize the orphanages, reformatories, and Children’s Aid Societies that removed thousands of children from their immigrant parents during the 19th century.», «her exclusion of Black and Native people from analysis perpetuates the racist and classist myth that the U.S. government supported family integrity.», «How was it that immigrant children could be shipped to midwestern farms, Indian children sent to boarding schools and forbidden to speak their language, and Black children sold away from their mothers if the overriding concern of the state and populace was the Family Ideal?», «An analysis sensitive to race and class issues as well as gender would emphasize the selective use of the Family Ideal to reinforce existing hierarchies.», «This law certainly cannot be viewed as supportive of “family privacy,” but rather is supportive of the views of a narrow, religious minority.», «It is not the Family Ideal that is threatened by such reforms, but rather the dependence of women on men, and their availability as cheap or free labor.», «The major contribution Pleck makes is in providing the details of previous family-violence reform movements.», «In the “Epilogue,” Pleck mentions the current emphasis on arrest of batterers (p. 202). However, she does so without reference to the famous Minneapolis research, the Duluth experiment, and the laws and policies mandating arrest that have emerged since 1982.», «Although she states that “criminalizing family violence can go only so far before the family must be provided with other economic resources,” she fails to draw on the rich material presented in previous chapters to build a substantive critique of criminalization.», «Pleck makes a major scholarly contribution with this history, but the radical theorizing that her facts demand is left to others.», «These three books emphasize the lack of both theoretical coherence within feminist work on male violence and diversity of experience.»

[Is/Mono]

[NOTE_FULL_NAME] Pleck Elizabeth Hafkin — Domestic Tyranny꞉ The Making of Social Policy Against Family Violence from Colonial Times to the Present (OUP, 1987)
 -->
1. Pleck Elizabeth Hafkin — Domestic Tyranny (OUP, 1987).pdf

<a id="Сильные-мира-сего"></a>
# Сильные мира сего

<a id="Власть"></a>
## Власть

<a id="Обретение-и-использование-власти"></a>
### Обретение и использование власти

<!--- [POSITIVE_OR_NEUTRAL_REVIEW][REVIEW_ONE_PAGE] Randy Englund, Hewlett-Packard Company — https://sci-hub.se/10.1016/0737-6782(93)90047-T

[POSITIVE_OR_NEUTRAL_REVIEW][REVIEW_ONE_PAGE] Howard White, International Initiative for Impact Evaluation — https://sci-hub.se/10.1080/19439342.2014.893640

[BOOK_OR_AUTHOR_OR_CONCEPT_CRITICISM] Mark S. Mizruchi, University of Michigan — https://sci-hub.se/https://www.jstor.org/stable/2781691 — «Early on (p. 19), Pfeffer notes that only after a decision is carried out can we know whether it is good or bad, which implies that a decision's consequences can be known. Yet much of the book is spent, correctly in my view, pointing out the near impossibility of deciphering the consequences of a decision.», «But how do we know which is which until it is too late? In fact, the ex post facto nature of much of Pfeffer's evidence is the most troubling aspect of the book.», «Still, there is plenty here for those interested in progressive social change», «In fact, the main problem that many will have with Pfeffer's argument is his insistence on the separation of ends and means. Devious means are often necessary to accomplish decent ends, he stresses.», «I am not entirely convinced by his selective use of evidence.»

João Climaco, Universidade de Coimbra — https://digitalis-dsp.uc.pt/bitstream/10316.2/25192/1/NotasEconomicas1_artigo12.pdf?ln=pt-pt — «Therefore it is essentially focused on a behavioural analysis of the power of persons and groups in organisations. It deals only indirectly with the structural changes of a global nature which we observe nowadays both at the political and structural levels», «Nevertheless it seems to me rather reductive in perspective. As an operational researcher I am used to debating with mathematicians who never give up constructing normative or abstractive models for the decision processes, even in the more complex cases. In my opinion, they do not understand that they are irrevocably destined to failure!», «In many cases disciplines such as cognitive psychology, sociology and political science have an important role to play. The position of Pfeffer lies in the opposite extreme of the mathematicians.»

[ADDITIONAL_READING] David G. White, Jr — «Disrupting Corporate Culture: How Cognitive Science Alters Accepted Beliefs About Culture and Culture Change and Its Impact on Leaders and Change Agents»

[NO_OCR][NO_SCEDRECO] -->
1. Пфеффер Джеффри — Власть и влияние. Политика и управление в организациях (Вильямс, 2007).pdf

<a id="Социальные-науки"></a>
# Социальные науки

<a id="Наука-действием"></a>
## Наука действием

<a id="Исследование-действием"></a>
### Исследование действием

<!--- [ACADEMIC_DEGREE_EDITOR] [Oregon Health & Science University, CV](https://ohsu.academia.edu/HilaryBradburyHuang/CurriculumVitae) — «1998 — Boston College Management/Organizational Behavior, PhD. Boston College Management/Organizational Behavior.»

[ACADEMIC_DEGREE] Согласно самой книге

Amy Rector Aranda — «earned her bachelor’s degree in Philosophy before entering the field of Educational Studies for her doctoral program at the University of Cincinnati, where she focuses on Educational and Community-based Action Research and Curriculum Theory»

Oğuz N. Babüroğlu — «a faculty member in the School of Management of Sabanci University and a founding Director of two companies that are fostering action research and action learning respectively, ARAMA and Mindport, in Turkey»

Susan Canney — «the Director of the Mali Elephant Project, a long-term initiative to conserve an iconic elephant population.»

Dana Carman — «Dana is a co-founder of MetaIntegral Academy and sits on the board of MetaIntegral Associates. He is a founding member of Action Inquiry Associates and a principal with The Institute of Coaching based in St Petersburg, Russia.»

Michael Drinkwater — «a founding member of WayFair Associate»

Graham Duncan — «Director of St Mary’s Community Centre situated in inner-city Sheffield, UK. He completed a master’s in Management (with distinction) at Sheffield Hallam University in 2010 with a dissertation on appreciative inquiry.»

Oscar Jara Holliday — «popular educator; Peruvian and Costa Rican sociologist. Director of the Centro de Estudios y Publicaciónes Alforja, Costa Rica, and President of the Consejo de Educación Popular de América Latina y el Caribe, CEAAL, which gathers around 200 organizations.»

Namrata Jaitli — «Head of Programmes at Charities Aid Foundation, India (since April 2014). Prior to that she was Deputy Director of the Society for Participatory Research in Asia (PRIA), an international centre for learning and promotion of participation and democratic governance.»

Robin Katcher — «senior advisor at Management Assistance Group (MAG) where she leads projects specializing in movement networks.»

Emre Koyuncu — «He holds an Executive MBA degree from the Middle East Technical University.»

Micheal Krot — «Michael received a BSc in Systems Engineering from the United States Naval Academy, an MBA from the Stanford Graduate School of Business, and a master’s in Education from the Stanford Graduate School of Education.»

Mark Leach — «DBA, is a senior consultant at Management Assistance Group (MAG).»

Juan Carlos Giles Macedo — «is a popular educator. For the last 20 years he has frequently acted as a facilitator and activist in capacityand autonomy-strengthening processes of social organizations in Peru and Latin America.»

Elisa Martínez — «is a founding member of WayFair Associates and a doctoral student in Sociology at the University of Massachusetts, Amherst.»

Laurie Mazur — «is an independent writer and consultant working at the intersection of environment, health, and social justice issues.»

John B. McGuire — «John has held senior business management positions in Digital Equipment Corporation and Fidelity Investments and holds master’s degrees from Harvard and Brandeis Universities.»

Angie P. Mejia — «is a doctoral candidate in the Department of Sociology at Syracuse University.»

Katrin Muff — «serves as Dean of Business School Lausanne since 2008»

Elissa Perry — «MFA. Elissa also teaches in the MA in Leadership Programs at Saint Mary’s College of California where she facilitates diverse, cross-sector, and multi-issue learning communities and recently helped establish a social justice concentration.»

Yumi Sera — «the founder and President of Mindfulness in Action at the same time as being a student majoring in Law at Keio University in Japan.»

Howard Silverman — «teaches systems thinking in the Collaborative Design MFA Program at Pacific Northwest College of Art.»

Lisa Stefanac — «She has an MBA from the University of Chicago’s Booth School of Business and graduated Magna Cum Laude from San Francisco State University with a BA in English Literature.»

Остальные профессора и/или PhD

[Kr/MCol][Ti/MCol]

[AUTHOR_PROJECT] Hilary Bradbury — [Action Research +](https://actionresearchplus.com/). [The Taos Institute](https://www.taosinstitute.net/about-us/people/institute-associates/west-us/oregon/hilary-bradbury) — «Hilary convenes AR+, a virtual community for participatory action researchers to nurture global interactivity and working partnerships between scholars and practitioners»

[POSITIVE_OR_NEUTRAL_REVIEW] Tim Cain, Research Centre for Schools, Colleges and Teacher Education, Edge Hill University, Ormskirk, UK, [International Journal of Research & Method in Education](https://sci-hub.se/10.1080/1743727X.2014.937521) — «Reason and Bradbury-Huan’s (2013) edition is very wide ranging in its scope andcoverage. The book starts by defining action research as ‘a family of practices of livinginquiry’ and it quickly becomes evident that the action research family is extremelylarge and disparate, embracing a sizeable number of the world’s poorest people; it isgenerous, articulate, politically engaged and above all, outward-looking and inter-national.», «In these chapters andothers, there is heroism; not the triumphalist, conquering heroism of those whowould defeat all, but that of scholarship getting its hands dirty, suffering with thepoor, tasting defeat but getting up and fighting again.», «At the same time, the chapters that focus mainly on epistemological issues areequally brilliant.», «The final chapter allows some hint of triumphalism, declaring ‘action research has wonall debates on ethics and epistemology’ and ‘the war with positivism is more or less over’(703). In the field of education, where ‘big data’ have returned with a vengeance, suchclaims appear premature.», «In this context, the Sage Handbook consoles and encourages:beyond academia, action research is a very considerable force for good. All in all, it iseverything that a handbook should be – thorough, informative and informed, wide-ranging, celebratory and brilliant. At the same time, it is often deeply personal and inten-sely political.»

Maeve O’Grady, Waterford Institute of Technology, Waterford City, Co. Waterford, Ireland, [Action Learning: Research and Practice](https://sci-hub.se/10.1080/14767333.2013.799394) — «Various levels of change are considered from the meso or middlelevel to the macro or structural level.», «It is stated that the possibility for action research depends upon the exist-ence of a community of practice as the best way to develop a community ofinquiry. This obviously creates a problem for the more traditional positivist researcher coming in from the outside, so the tensions in such relationshipsare considered.», «The weaknesses of the Handbook are twofold: 1. The wide scope of the Handbook and the need to thoroughly readthe introduction to each of the four sections before a pathway can befound. 2. Many of the theorists are not listed in the index. The poststructuralistresearcher may find herself wandering a bit before finding Foucault onpage 127 or in Chapter 11.», «However, those PhD supervisors who have concerns about the link between individual postgraduate research and a wider social change mission have anew ‘bible’ in this Handbook, as the relationship is clear throughout between academic knowledge and social and organisational change-focused purposesand practices», «It is a resource recommended for both pragmatic-activists, to help theirthinking, and academic-activists, to help their practice as agents of change. The researcher is one who does not claim power over any project, but concen-trates on findings ways for exercising power with stakeholders and co-inquirers, in order to foster power to achieve desired change.»

[ADDITIONAL_READING] Hilary Bradbury (edited by) — «Cooking with Action Research Stories and Resources for Self and Community Transformation»

Hilary Bradbury, William Torbert — «Eros/Power: Love in the Spirit of Inquiry»

David Coghlan, Mary Brydon-Miller — «The SAGE Encyclopedia of Action Research»

Benoit Gauthier (edited by) — «Recherche sociale: De la problematique a la collecte des donnees»

Gabriele Bammer — «Disciplining Interdisciplinarity. Integration and Implementation Sciences for Researching Complex Real-World Problems»

Davydd Greenwood, Morten Levin — «Introduction to Action Research: Social Research for Social Change»

Elaine Herdman-Barker — «Director of the Global Leadership Profile at Action Inquiry Associates.»

Oscar Jara Holliday — «La sistematización de experiencias, práctica y teoría para otros mundos posibles»

Chris Argyris, Robert Putnam, Diana McLain Smith (edited by) — «Action Science»

Diana McLain Smith — «Elephant in the Room: How Relationships Make Or Break the Success of Leaders and Organizations»

Donald A. Schön — «The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think In Action»

Микаэль Крогерус, Роман Чеппелер — «Книга решений. 50 моделей стратегического мышления»

 -->
1. Bradbury Hilary (edited by) — The SAGE Handbook of Action Research. Participative Inquiry and Practice (SAGE Publications, 2015).pdf

<a id="Социология"></a>
# Социология

<a id="Введение-в-социологию"></a>
## Введение в социологию

<!--- [ACADEMIC_DEGREE] [Uppslagsverket Finland, Encyclopedia](https://www.uppslagsverket.fi/sv/sok/view-170045-AspErkki) — «sociolog, fil.dr 1965. A. var professor i sociologi vid Åbo universitet 1968-98. I sin mångsidiga forskning har han behandlat bl.a samesamhällen och problem i arbetslivet»

[NO_SCEDRECO]

[REVIEW_CHECK] 2021-7-16

[NO_REVIEW]

[Is/Hb]

[CRIM_FILE_QUALITY] -->
1. Асп Эркки Калеви — Введение в социологию (Алетейя, 2000).pdf
<!--- [ACADEMIC_DEGREE] [University of Gotheburg](https://www.gu.se/en/about/find-staff/permanson) — «and his doctorate in 1987 and became associate professor in 1991. Since 1972, he has worked as a teacher and researcher, mainly at the Department of Sociology, University of Gothenburg, but for a few years at the turn of the century also worked at Linköping University. For many years he worked as a teacher and developed an interest in sociological theory, including social psychology, historical sociology, which resulted in several widely used textbooks.»

[BOOK_SUPPORT] Федеральная целевая программа книгоиздания России

[NO_SCEDRECO][NO_SOURCES]

[REVIEW_CHECK] 2021-7-16

[NO_REVIEW]

[N/WS]
 -->
1. Монсон Пер — Лодка на аллеях парка꞉ Введение в социологию (Весь Мир, 1994).pdf
<!--- [ACADEMIC_DEGREE] Феррис — «University of California, Los Angeles Ph.D. in Sociology, March 1997» — https://www.niu.edu/clas/sociology/_pdf/CVs/Ferris-Kerry-CV.pdf

«Stein graduated with a master’s and Ph.D. in sociology from UCLA» — https://www.thechannels.org/features/2019/11/22/sociology-professor-turns-rock-passion-into-scientific-research/

Согласно книге, «In the course of our creating the Sixth Edition, many instructors offered advice and comments on particular chapters, or in some cases, large sections of the text. We are deeply indebted to them» и идёт большой список (страница XXVI). Возможно, это основание для включения в категорию «Kr».

[BOOK_OR_AUTHOR_OR_CONCEPT_CRITICISM] Patrick Gaboriau, Directeur de rechercheen anthropologie sociale Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (Cnrs), Paris — https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-01628512/document — «il s’agit de décrypterla vie actuellenord-américaine (le reste du monde est peu présent)», «Les théories nord-américaines sont mises en avant (l’interactionnisme, le fonctionnalisme, l’Ecole de Chicago) davantage que les approches européennes (bien que Durkheim et Weber soient couramment cités). Les études européennes des trente dernières annéessont pour ainsi dire absentes.», «ilpeut aussi y acquérirun savoir général qui lui permettra de briller en société ou dans une dissertation sur le monde social. Mais s’agit-il vraiment de sociologie?», «Au final, ce manuel apparaît comme un livre de culture générale. Il peut se lire avec l’idée suivante : qu’est-ce qu’un nord-américain est supposé savoir dans le monde social dans lequel il vit?», «Bien vite, au fur et à mesure de la lecture, une question émerge: que signifie apprendre la sociologie sans en faire?Les statistiques apparaissent ainsi comme des données existantesqu’il s’agit simplement de commenter, alors qu’ellesdevraient inciter àune réflexion sur les classifications et d’emblée comporter une part decritique des chiffres proposés.»
 -->
1. Ferris Kerry О., Stein Jill — The Real World. An Introduction to Sociology (W. W. Norton, 2018).pdf

<a id="Научный-инструментарий-социолога"></a>
## Научный инструментарий социолога

<!--- [INFO] Большая редакционная коллегия; учёный секретарь Кабыща Адольф Васильевич — https://endic.ru/sociology/Kabyscha-Adolf-Vasilevich-3524.html

[ADDITIONAL_READING] Эдмунд Внук-Липиньский — Социология публичной жизни

[NO_OCR]

[NOTE] Bad book quality -->
1. [Осипов Геннадий Васильевич](https://www.isras.ru/pers_about.html?id=532) (под общей редакцией) — Рабочая книга социолога (Либроком, 2009).pdf

<a id="Опросы-общественного-мнения"></a>
## Опросы общественного мнения

<!--- [NOTE] У Левинсона нет учёной степени в социологии. Согласно Википедии, «В условиях, когда сектор был разогнан, диссертацию по проблемам архаического города не защитил». Проходит как учёный в другой области — он кандидат искусствоведения (или как профессионал — заведующий отделом Левада-центра) -->
1. [Левинсон Алексей Георгиевич](https://www.hse.ru/org/persons/63786) — Как считают рейтинг (Дискурс, 2018).pdf

<a id="Софизматика"></a>
## Софизматика

<a id="NR-67"></a>
### NR

<a id="Общественная-академия"></a>
#### Общественная академия

<!--- [ACADEMIC_DEGREE] Доктор технических наук, профессор

[NOTE] Согласно книгам, Ильин — академик Международной академии информатизации, сильно раскритикованной — https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%9C%D0%B5%D0%B6%D0%B4%D1%83%D0%BD%D0%B0%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B4%D0%BD%D0%B0%D1%8F_%D0%B0%D0%BA%D0%B0%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BC%D0%B8%D1%8F_%D0%B8%D0%BD%D1%84%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%BC%D0%B0%D1%82%D0%B8%D0%B7%D0%B0%D1%86%D0%B8%D0%B8#%D0%9A%D1%80%D0%B8%D1%82%D0%B8%D0%BA%D0%B0_%D0%B4%D0%B5%D1%8F%D1%82%D0%B5%D0%BB%D1%8C%D0%BD%D0%BE%D1%81%D1%82%D0%B8

[NOTE] "Но следует быть внимательным – у них есть серия «Relata Refero» (дословно – «рассказываю рассказанное», а проще говоря – «за что купил, за то продал»). Это книги, изданные за счет авторов, не нашедших понимания у научного сообщества" — http://images.astronet.ru/pubd/2019/05/05/0001468630/neb_0519.pdf#page=25 . Примеры книг — «Кардинальные ошибки Эйнштейна», «Заблуждения и ошибки фундаментальных концепций физики» — https://www.livelib.ru/pubseries/703223-relata-refero .

[Ильин Валерий Николаевич](https://mai.ru/content/people/index.php?ID=23432).

[BOOK_SERIES] Relata Refero

[INFO] На книгу много ссылаются — https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=%D0%98%D0%BB%D1%8C%D0%B8%D0%BD+%22%D0%9D%D0%B5%D0%B3%D1%83%D0%BC%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%82%D0%B0%D1%80%D0%BD%D0%B0%D1%8F+%D1%81%D0%BE%D1%86%D0%B8%D0%BE%D0%BB%D0%BE%D0%B3%D0%B8%D1%8F%22

[CRIM_NO_REFS][NO_SCEDRECO] -->
1. Ильин Валерий Николаевич — Негуманитарная социология. Новый взгляд на обществоведение (Либроком, 2009).djvu

<a id="Социальная-термодинамика"></a>
### Социальная термодинамика

<a id="NR-68"></a>
#### NR

<a id="Общественная-академия-1"></a>
##### Общественная академия

<!--- [INFO] На книгу много ссылаются — https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=%D0%98%D0%BB%D1%8C%D0%B8%D0%BD+%22%D0%A2%D0%B5%D1%80%D0%BC%D0%BE%D0%B4%D0%B8%D0%BD%D0%B0%D0%BC%D0%B8%D0%BA%D0%B0+%D0%B8+%D1%81%D0%BE%D1%86%D0%B8%D0%BE%D0%BB%D0%BE%D0%B3%D0%B8%D1%8F%22

[BOOK_SERIES] Relata Refero

[NOTE] Согласно книгам, Ильин — академик Международной академии информатизации, сильно раскритикованной — https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%9C%D0%B5%D0%B6%D0%B4%D1%83%D0%BD%D0%B0%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B4%D0%BD%D0%B0%D1%8F_%D0%B0%D0%BA%D0%B0%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BC%D0%B8%D1%8F_%D0%B8%D0%BD%D1%84%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%BC%D0%B0%D1%82%D0%B8%D0%B7%D0%B0%D1%86%D0%B8%D0%B8#%D0%9A%D1%80%D0%B8%D1%82%D0%B8%D0%BA%D0%B0_%D0%B4%D0%B5%D1%8F%D1%82%D0%B5%D0%BB%D1%8C%D0%BD%D0%BE%D1%81%D1%82%D0%B8

[NOTE] "Но следует быть внимательным – у них есть серия «Relata Refero» (дословно – «рассказываю рассказанное», а проще говоря – «за что купил, за то продал»). Это книги, изданные за счет авторов, не нашедших понимания у научного сообщества" — http://images.astronet.ru/pubd/2019/05/05/0001468630/neb_0519.pdf#page=25 . Примеры книг — «Кардинальные ошибки Эйнштейна», «Заблуждения и ошибки фундаментальных концепций физики» — https://www.livelib.ru/pubseries/703223-relata-refero .

[Ильин Валерий Николаевич](https://mai.ru/content/people/index.php?ID=23432).

[BOOK_SERIES] Relata Refero

[CRIM_NO_REFS][NO_OCR][NO_SCEDRECO] -->
1. Ильин Валерий Николаевич — Термодинамика и социология. Физические основы социальных процессов и явлений (КомКнига, 2005).pdf

<a id="Спорт"></a>
# Спорт

<a id="Нейробиология-спортсменов"></a>
## Нейробиология спортсменов

<!--- [JOURNALISM_DEGREE] По собственному утверждению, «I am a senior editor at WIRED UK and the editor of Professional Engineering magazine. My work has also appeared in Sport magazine, The Times, the Guardian, the Independent, the Telegraph, the Independent, FourFourTwo, Science Uncovered and more.», «I was shortlisted for Feature Writer of the Year by the Sports Journalists Association for my work in 2016, and won Editor of the Year at the Memcom awards and the Association of British Science Writers’ awards in 2019.»

[CRIM_SPEAKER] https://www.clippings.me/amitkatwala

[NO_PDF][NO_SCEDRECO][NO_REVIEW] -->
1. Кетвала Амит — Атлетичный мозг. Как нейробиология совершает революцию в спорте и помогает вам добиться высоких результатов (Азбука-Аттикус, 2017).epub

<a id="Принципы-чемпионов"></a>
## Принципы чемпионов

<!--- [ACADEMIC_DEGREE] PhD, LPC — https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/trust-the-talent

[CRIM_SPEAKER] https://www.theathletesummit.com/speakers/

[NO_PDF][NO_SCEDRECO][NO_REVIEW] -->
1. [Афремов Джим](https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/trust-the-talent) — Разум чемпионов. Как мыслят, тренируются и побеждают великие спортсмены (Азбука-Аттикус, 2017).fb2
<!--- [NO_DEGREE] «Tim earned his Master’s degree in Exercise Science and his Bachelor’s degree in Kinesiology at University of Illinois-Chicago.» — https://timgrover.com/about/

[PROFESSIONAL_DEGREE] “and his list of current and former clients include Jordan, Charles Barkley, Kobe Bryant and Dwyane Wade” — https://www.si.com/edge/2014/06/02/how-tim-grover-became-one-nbas-most-revered-trainers ; Уэнк — ghostwriter — https://www.simonandschuster.com/authors/Shari-Wenk/407775199

[CRIM_SPEAKER] https://timgrover.com/speaking/

[BOOK_SERIES] Спорт изнутри

[NO_SCANNED_PDF][NO_SOURCES][NO_REVIEW] -->
1. [Гровер Тим](https://www.si.com/edge/2014/06/02/how-tim-grover-became-one-nbas-most-revered-trainers), Уэнк Шари — Манифест великого тренера. Как стать из хорошего спортсмена великим чемпионом (Эксмо, 2019).fb2
<!--- [ACADEMIC_DEGREE] “He received a Ph.D. in sports psychology from the University of Connecticut” — https://www.forbes.com/forbes/2007/1126/162.html?sh=1f1ed4217b1d . Множество публикаций в спортивных научных журналах — https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=robert+rotella . О Каллене нашёл лишь, что это соавтор Ротеллы — http://theaposition.com/bobcullengolf/ .

[CRIM_NO_REFS] Нет сносок на источники в том числе в оригинале, из-за чего только категория «Профессионалы»

[CRIM] Спикер — https://speaking.com/speakers/robert-rotella/ , https://www.bigspeak.com/speakers/robert-rotella/ -->
1. [Ротелла Роберт](https://www.forbes.com/forbes/2007/1126/162.html?sh=1f1ed4217b1d), Каллен Боб — Психология чемпионов. Мышление, приводящее к победе в спорте и жизни (Манн, Иванов и Фербер, 2017).pdf

<a id="Теннисная-психология"></a>
## Теннисная психология

<!--- [PROFESSIONAL_DEGREE] Гилберт — экс-четвёртая ракетка мира — https://www.atptour.com/en/players/-/G016/overview ; Джеймисон — писатель, http://stevejamison.com/

[NO_OCR][NO_SCEDRECO][NO_SOURCES][NO_REVIEW] -->
1. [Гилберт Бред](https://www.atptour.com/en/players/-/G016/overview), Джеймисон Стив — Победа любой ценой. Психологическое оружие в теннисе. Уроки мастера (ЗАО «Олимп — Бизнес», 2004).pdf

<a id="Тренерская-работа"></a>
## Тренерская работа

<!--- [ACADEMIC_DEGREE] «Martens received his Ph.D. from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign in 1968 and became Assistant Professor of Kinesiology at the University of Illinois» — https://archon.library.illinois.edu/index.php?p=creators/creator&id=3185 , «former Professor of Kinesiology at the University of Illinois (1968-1984)»

[AUTHOR_PROJECT] Human Kinetics, the world's largest publisher of sport, physical activity, and health resources as of 2020 — https://archon.library.illinois.edu/index.php?p=creators/creator&id=3185

[CRIM_REDONDAS] Подзаголовок и описание — «самое успешное руководство по тренерской деятельности»

[CRIM_TRANSLATE] В сравнении с оригиналом — http://libgen.rs/book/index.php?md5=31368E40A1B5C5DD45042BDEE031131F — убран список источников; книга на русском не цветная

[NO_SCEDRECO][NO_REVIEW] -->
1. [Мартенс Райнер](https://archon.library.illinois.edu/index.php?p=creators/creator&id=3185) — Успешный тренер. Самое авторитетное руководство по тренерской деятельности (Человек, 2014).pdf

<a id="Статистика"></a>
# Статистика

<a id="Важнейшие-статистические-концепции-на-практике"></a>
## Важнейшие статистические концепции на практике

<!--- [NOTE] Уилан — PhD in public policy, однако я не нашёл сведений, что он имеет учёную степень в области статистики. В категорию «учёные в других областях».

[NOTE][CRIM_SCIENCE_EDITOR] Научный редактор — Александр Александрович Минько. Не удалось найти такого человека с учёной степенью в областях, близких со статистикой. -->
1. [Уилан Чарльз](https://economics.dartmouth.edu/people/charles-j-wheelan) — Голая Статистика. Самая интересная книга о самой скучной науке (Манн, Иванов и Фербер, 2016).pdf

<a id="Злоупотребления-статистикой"></a>
## Злоупотребления статистикой

<!--- [NOTE] Впоследствии Хаффа финансировали табачные компании — https://sci-hub.se/10.1111/j.1740-9713.2014.00765.x . Это было до написанния данной книги, Хафф получает категорию «с ограничениями». Хафф — фрилансер без учёных званий; проходит по критерию для фрилансеров — если обзор на его книгу имеется в научных источниках. Обзор на Хаффа сделан в престижном Пенсильванском университете — https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/University_of_Pennsylvania .

[NOTE][CRIM_SCIENCE_EDITOR] Научным редактором указан Вячеслав Ионов, не имеющий соответствующего образования — http://editorium.ru/266/

[ADDITIONAL_READING] Darrell Huff — «How To Take a Chance»
 -->
1. [Хафф Дарелл](https://sci-hub.se/10.1111/j.1740-9713.2014.00765.x) — [Как лгать при помощи статистики](https://repository.upenn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1571&context=statistics_papers) (Альпина Паблишер, 2016).pdf

<a id="Польза-от-правильного-обращения-со-статистикой"></a>
## Польза от правильного обращения со статистикой

<!--- [PROFESSIONAL_DEGREE] [Personal site](https://www.kaiserfung.com/about) — «My writing has appeared in many publications, including Harvard Business Review, FiveThirtyEight, The Daily Beast, American Scientist, and Significance. I have also been cited by New York Times, Financial Times, Wired, and others. I teach business analytics and data visualization at Columbia University, and run workshops for corporations and organizations. I have also taught at New York University for over 10 years. I hold an MBA from Harvard Business School, and degrees in engineering and statistics from Princeton and Cambridge Universities.»

[AUTHOR_PROJECT] Блог [«Junk Charts»](https://junkcharts.typepad.com/)

[CRIM_COACH] Career coach, [personal site](https://www.kaiserfung.com/data-science-career-coach)

[CRIM_SPEAKER] [Personal site](https://www.kaiserfung.com/speaker)

[N/Mass]

[POSITIVE_OR_NEUTRAL_REVIEW] Richard Asquith, Kantar Media, [International Journal of Market Research](https://sci-hub.se/10.2501/IJMR-54-2-291-292) — «It is not a statistics textbook, there are no formulae to be found in it, rather it aims to show how the application of statistics can explain and sometimes influence the world around us.», «But Numbers Rule Your Worldis not without its weaknesses and a couple of the chapters feel over-long and padded out.», «Fung has a curiously circular writing style with the same point made repeatedly. Indeed, the statistics at work behind Disney queue management is flagged three times in the Introduction (and fills much of the book jacket) before Chapter 1 covers it in detail.», «Some of the content also seems rather contrived; the inclusion of a section on ‘education-obsessed mothers’ in Asia and the link to the selection of certain consumer brand names adds little to the underlying point of the chapter on insurance and school tests.», «Set alongside the aforementioned popular social scientists, the subjects are just not as consistently compelling as Levitt’s and do not have the warmth and humanity of Gladwell’s writing on real people and their motivations . That said, in connecting real world events with the application of statisti-cal theory, Numbers Rule Your Worldpresents a wide range of examples of statistics explaining, and in some cases determining, the way things happen around us . In doing so, Fung makes the important point that statistics and sta-tistical analysis do not exist in a purely academic vacuum.»

[ADDITIONAL_READING] Kaiser Fung — «Numbersense: how to use big data to your advantage»

Howard Wainer — «Graphic Discovery: A Trout in the Milk and Other Visual Adventures»

Howard Wainer — «Visual Revelations. Graphical Tales of Fate and Deception from Napoleon Bonaparte to Ross Perot»

Edward R. Tufte — «Envisioning Information»

Edward R. Tufte — «The Visual Display of Quantitative Information»

Stephen Senn — «Dicing with death: Chance, risk and health»

Эрик Сигель — «Просчитать будущее: Кто кликнет, купит, соврёт или умрёт»

Michael Kaplan, Ellen Kaplan — «Chances Are… Adventures in Probability»

Judith M. Tanur and etc. (edited by) — «Statistics: A Guide to the Unknown»

Леонард Млодинов — «(Не) совершенная случайность. Как случай управляет нашей жизнью»

Ian Ayres — «Super Crunchers: Why Thinking-by-Numbers Is the New Way to Be Smart»

Малкольм Гладуэлл — «Озарение. Сила мгновенных решений»

Малкольм Гладуэлл — «Переломный момент: Как незначительные изменения приводят к глобальным переменам»

Sam L. Savage — «The Flaw of Averages: Why We Underestimate Risk in the Face of Uncertainty»

Jeffrey S. Rosenthal — «Struck By Lightning: The Curious World of Probabilities»

Ариэли Дэн — «Позитивная иррациональность. Как извлекать выгоду из своих нелогичных поступков»

Ариэли Дэн — «Предсказуемая иррациональность. Скрытые силы, определяющие наши решения»

Талеб Нассим Николас — «Одураченные случайностью. Скрытая роль Шанса на рынках и в Жизни»

Талеб Нассим Николас — «Чёрный лебедь. Под знаком непредсказуемости»

[NO_SOURCES][CRIM_BIBLIOGRAPHY_END] Согласно книге, «A complete bibliography is available at the book’s link on my website, www.junkcharts.typepad.com.». Но я не нашёл там полной библиографии. В конце книги приводится большой список источников о статистике.

[NO_SCEDRECO] -->
1. Fung Kaiser — Numbers Rule Your World꞉ The Hidden Influence of Probabilities and Statistics on Everything You Do (McGraw-Hill, 2010).pdf

<a id="Успех"></a>
# Успех

<a id="Внутренние-установки"></a>
## Внутренние установки

<a id="HC-13"></a>
### HC

<!--- [ACADEMIC_DEGREE] Ph.D., Psychology, Yale University — https://cap.stanford.edu/profiles/viewCV?facultyId=10485&name=Carol_Dweck

[NOTE] Переводчик — кандидат философских наук Светлана Кирова, но я не смог найти такую в Интернете

[POSITIVE_OR_NEUTRAL_REVIEW][REVIEW_RETELLING] Dona Matthews, Hunter College, The City University of New York — https://docs.lib.purdue.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1013&context=giftedchildren ;

[REVIEW_RETELLING] Tracy Turner, Los Angeles, Calif — https://poseidon01.ssrn.com/delivery.php?ID=378070074070097104126099074083122076009075022081036087078089004067079006091125078007021011006001039100019102098005111082124092116049039081035031110115091065093124071081009009092068095127004104070103121068000082025000095023030076095074115112116117089&EXT=pdf&INDEX=TRUE ;

Donna Scott Tiley, Texas Woman’s University College of Nursing — https://sci-hub.se/https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdfdirect/10.1002/nur.22048 ;

Tom Bennett, ResearchED author — https://www.tes.com/news/weekend-read-growth-mindset-new-learning-styles — “But growth mindset appeals emotionally and altruistically. And, because of that, it’s very seductive. It feels right that you don’t criticise the person, but invite them to believe that, through hard work and persistence, you can achieve.”, “There’s something that I call a magic mirror. Even good research, by the time it reaches the classroom – it’s become transmogrified into something that bears no resemblance to its original version.”, “The relationship between schools and research is still very, very embryonic”;

Nick Brown, personal coach and psychology researcher — https://steamtraen.blogspot.com/2017/01/in-which-science-actually-self-corrects.html — “We found some apparent inconsistencies and wrote a polite note to the authors; they investigated and identified all of the problems (and were very gracious about us calling out the non-problems, too). With Dr. Dweck's consent, I have written this story up as an example of how science can still do things right. I’m still skeptical about mindset as a construct, but at least I feel confident that the main people researching it are dedicated to doing the most careful reporting of their science that they can.”;

[BOOK_OR_AUTHOR_OR_CONCEPT_CRITICISM] Francesca Foliano, Heather Rolfe, Jonathan Buzzeo, Johnny Runge, David Wilkinson — https://www.niesr.ac.uk/sites/default/files/publications/Changing%20Mindsets_0.pdf#page=43 — “Pupils in schools that received the intervention did not make any additional progress in literacy nor numeracy. This finding has high security.”, “The evaluation did not find evidence of an impact on these measures for pupils in schools that received Changing Mindsets.”;

Carl Hendricks, school teacher — “The thing that’s going to help little Johnny solve quadratic equations is learning about quadratic equations”; John Tomsett, Huntington School — “Worse: it ends up being cited as some kind of cure-all panacea for underachievement. We’ve stopped using the phrase ‘growth mindset’, because the students have got sick of it.”; Dylan Wiliam, emeritus professor of educational assessment at the UCL Institute of Education — “There have been three attempts to replicate Carol Dweck’s work, and it doesn’t appear to be replicable. She says it’s difficult, subtle work.” — https://www.tes.com/news/weekend-read-growth-mindset-new-learning-styles

[CRIM_SPEAKER] https://www.ted.com/speakers/carol_dweck ; Education Endowment Foundation — https://www.tes.com/news/teaching-teachers-about-growth-mindset-has-little-impact-students-progress — “However, the pupils whose teachers received the professional development intervention made no additional progress in maths compared to pupils in the control group.”

[NO_SCEDRECO]
-->
1. [Дуэк Кэрол](https://profiles.stanford.edu/carol-dweck) — Гибкое сознание. Новый взгляд на психологию развития взрослых и детей (Манн, Иванов и Фербер, 2013).pdf

<a id="Успех-идей"></a>
## Успех идей

<a id="NR-69"></a>
### NR

<a id="Истории-финансового-успеха-от-первого-лица-6"></a>
#### Истории финансового успеха от первого лица

1. Хиз Чип, Хиз Дэн — Сделано, чтобы прилипать (2018).pdf

<a id="Утопия"></a>
# Утопия

<a id="Политическая-утопия-XXI-века"></a>
## Политическая утопия XXI века

<a id="NR-70"></a>
### NR

<a id="Непрофессионализм-14"></a>
#### Непрофессионализм

<!--- [CRIM] Спикер — https://www.ted.com/talks/rutger_bregman_poverty_isn_t_a_lack_of_character_it_s_a_lack_of_cash

[ACADEMIC_DEGREE] Согласно Википедии, «Master of Arts» — https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rutger_Bregman#Education . Этой учёной степени недостаточно — https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Master_of_Arts .

[POSITIVE_OR_NEUTRAL_REVIEW] Neil Howard, University of Bath — https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/utopia-for-realists-review/ — рабочая критика;

[REVIEW_RETELLING] Dougal Jeffries, retired GP, [British Journal of General Practice](https://bjgp.org/content/bjgp/67/660/319.full.pdf)

[REVIEW_RETELLING] Peter Carrol — a Media Relations Officer at London School of Economics — https://eprints.lse.ac.uk/83940/1/lsereviewofbooks-2017-07-24-book-review-utopia-for-realists-and-how.pdf — «Despite the author’s enthusiasm for universal basic income, the case Bregman makes for the book’s centralproposal is not wholly convincing. A recurring criticism of universal basic income is that it fails to recognise therole of work in providing humans with dignity and purpose in their lives; although Bregman uses his examples toargue that people did not work significantly less when receiving a universal basic income. But the instances hecites, such as Dauphin and relating to homeless people in the City of London, are relatively small-scale and haveonly been tested over a short period of time.»

[BOOK_OR_AUTHOR_OR_CONCEPT_CRITICISM][REVIEW_SMASHER] Bill Metcalf, University of Queensland — https://app.box.com/s/3e6ywl2h8ousgt20fmtd1gqzpqx9ik4i — «The disadvantage for scholars is that such online publications usually have not been peer-reviewed or carefully edited.», «Bregman, like many pop intellectuals, presents what he considers to be hard data derived from myriad sources, some no doubt the result of excellent research and some, equally with no doubt, derived from shoddy research. But it is very hard for the reader to discern—or even to have faith that Bregman tried to discern and discriminate.», «Worse yet, most of these "factoids" are either unreferenced or cited only to other Internet sites.», «Bregman makes sweeping and unsupported statements with redundant terms», «To appear to support this implied causal relationship with sound, objective data, like many undergraduate students, journalists, and untrained social observers, he confuses association between variables with causation.», «This book is riddled with faulty logic that would see an undergraduate student chastised.», «In conclusion, while Utopia for Realists appears to be a popular book, it offers little to discerning scholars such as those who read Utopian Studies. It presents no new evidence or original thesis, instead offering a gruel-like mishmash of ideas based on questionable data and analysis.»

[REVIEW_SAYS_LITTLE] Gregory Clayes, University of London — https://sci-hub.se/10.1080/03071022.2017.1359982 — «But our long-term problems are much more critical than this solution indicates»

[CRITICISM_IDEAS] Karen Stroobants, PhD in biotechnologies — http://www.cuspe.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/Stroobants-August-2017.pdf — “While Bregman’s casefor abasic income is convincing, his argumentfor ashorterworkweek isclearly less established”; “Similarly, Bregman touches on the idea of open borders, but fails to develop in detail how developing countries would be included in his model. His concepts are proposed from a very Western-centricviewpoint, and he mightas well have better left them in the West. I cannot get over the feeling that the open border concept is pulled into the story as a fast solution for inclusivity, unfortunately not a very convincing one.”, “While I was ‘a believer’ in the first place, I can see how his bookcanbeenriching forevery reader, whether they do or do not agree with the concepts advocated for. The extent to whichBregman has provided me withthemore practical arguments I had hoped for, is less clear.”

Дмитрий Давыдов, научный сотрудник Института философии и права УрО, [Свободная мысль](http://svom.info/entry/836-vozrozhdenie-utopii-zametki-na-polyah-knigi-r-breg/) — «Уязвимость здесь в другом: Брегман так и не дает ответов на вопрос, кто, при каких обстоятельствах и зачем будет стремиться к воплощению в жизнь его идей.», «Здесь же он делает весьма смелое и спорное предположение, что увеличение часов на искусства, историю и философию в школе что-то изменит к лучшему. Скорее, "спрос на художников, историков и философов" лишь приведет к росту доли "лишних людей", бесполезных для современной высокотехнологической экономики», «Она призывает обратить внимание на те проблемы, о которых сегодня нечасто говорят. Это хорошая попытка построить пусть даже пока еще не совсем четкий, но при этом яркий образ лучшего будущего», «Однако автор сих строк считает, что настоящая Утопия о светлом будущем обществе еще ждет своего автора»
 -->
1. Брегман Рутгер — Утопия для реалистов. Как построить идеальный мир (Альпина Паблишер, 2018).pdf

<a id="Философия"></a>
# Философия

<a id="Вопросы-философии"></a>
## Вопросы философии

<a id="NR-71"></a>
### NR

<a id="Паранаука-3"></a>
#### Паранаука

<!--- [NOTE] Глава (или раздел) «Надежды эзотеризма» не называет эзотерику паранаукой также как и научная статья этого же автора «Трансперсональная философия ХХ века о человеке (С. Гроф и К. Уилбер)» — https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/transpersonalnaya-filosofiya-hh-veka-o-cheloveke-s-grof-i-k-uilber .

[BOOK_CITATIONS] «Современные научные представления, как это ни покажется странным, все более смыкаются с древним эзотерическим знанием в описании глубинного устройства мира.»

[INFO] О трансперсональной психологии Станислава Грофа — https://www.elibrary.ru/download/elibrary_11657883_16776864.pdf
-->
1. [Золотухина-Аболина Елена Всеволодовна](https://ras.jes.su/index.php?dispatch=authors.details&author_id=20812) — Страна Философия (Феникс, 1995).doc

<a id="Западная-философия-XX-века"></a>
## Западная философия XX века

<a id="Направления-понятия-и-персоналии-западной-философии-XX-века"></a>
### Направления, понятия и персоналии западной философии XX века

<!--- [INFO] Книга имеет множество авторов. В названии — редколлегия.

[Хёффе Отфрид](https://www.leopoldina.org/fileadmin/redaktion/Mitglieder/CV_Hoeffe_Otfried_D.pdf), [Малахов Владимир Сергеевич](https://www.msses.ru/about/teachers/malakhov-vladimir-sergeevich/), [Филатов Владимир Петрович](https://www.ff-rggu.ru/coworker/filatov_vp/), [Дмитриев Тимофей Александрович](https://www.hse.ru/org/persons/509134) 

[NOTE_FULL_NAME] Хёффе Отфрид, Малахов Владимир Сергеевич, Филатов Владимир Петрович, Дмитриев Тимофей Александрович (ред.) — Современная западная философия (Культурная революция, 2009)

[BOOK_SUPPORT] Фонд Фритца Тиссена (ФРГ) -->
1. Хёффе Отфрид и другие (ред.) — Современная западная философия (Культурная революция, 2009).pdf

<a id="Ключевые-философские-аргументы"></a>
## Ключевые философские аргументы

<!--- [ACADEMIC_DEGREE_EDITORS] Барбон, [San Diego State University, CV](https://philosophy.sdsu.edu/bios/cv/Barbone-CV-2019.pdf) — «PhD philosophy, Marquette University, 1997»

Брюс, согласно самой книге, «MA, earned his degree in philosophy at San Diego State University»

[ACADEMIC_DEGREE] Согласно книге, Nicolas Bommarito — «BA, is a PhD student at Brown University, Providence»,

Michael Bruce — «MA, earned his degree in philosophy at San Diego State University»

John M. DePoe — «candidate for the PhD, is at the University of Iowa»,

Luis Estrada-González — «PhD student, studies contemporary philosophy at the Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Morelos (UAEM), Mexico, and for the academic year 2010 – 11 was on a research stay at the Bernoulli Research Institute of the University of Groningen, Netherlands»

Matthew Frise — «MA, is a philosophy PhD student at the University of Rochester»

A. T. Fyfe — «MA, teaches philosophy at Pierce College in Washington State»

Ivan Kasa — «MA, who has a degree in philosophy and a diploma in mathematics, is a Marie Curie Early Stage Researcher in Philosophy at the University of Stockholm, Sweden»

Nicolas Pain — «MA, has earned MA degrees in both philosophy at Lyon 3 Jean Moulin University and in French modern literature at Paris IV Sorbonne»

Andrew Russo — «PhD student of philosophy at the University of Oklahoma»

Dan Weijers — «BA, is a lecturing assistant and PhD candidate in the Philosophy Department at Victoria University of Wellington»

Остальные — PhD

[Kr/MCol][N/MCol]

[POSITIVE_OR_NEUTRAL_REVIEW][REVIEW_RETELLING] Giulio Giacometti, Università degli Studi di Padova, [Universa. Recensioni di filosofia](https://universa.padovauniversitypress.it/system/files/papers/02-1-06.pdf) — «Questo libro, scritto a centoquaranta mani, è modestamente presentato dai due curatori come una guida allo studio della filosofia per studenti universitari alle prime armi che possa, per la prima volta, darloro ciò che finora è mancato: un’ampia (sebbene non esaustiva e non incontroversa) selezione di introduzioni agli argomenti, cioè a quei fondamentali specifici della filosofia che la distinguono, per oggettività e rigore logico, dalle soluzioni soggettive ai problemi posti dalla vita e dall’esperienza.», «Le sei parti della rassegna, oltre a non esporre al loro interno tutti gli argomenti importanti, lasciano purtroppo fuoridall’opera intere branche come l’estetica e la filosofia della storia. Dal punto di vista storico, spicca l’assenza di tutti i pensatori tedeschi vissuti tra Kant e Frege», «Questo libro potrebbe essere la prima asse di un’arca che ci salvi dall’alluvione di letteratura erudita, storicista e meramente saggistica proveniente dal campo continentale e di quella cavillosa proveniente dal campo analitico, nella misura in cui esso risveglia la consapevolezza che di fronte ai problemi i filosofi devono sia proporre non solo soluzioni ma anche argomentazioni delle soluzioni sia nonperdere di vista il nucleo concettuale della questione.»

[ADDITIONAL_READING] Stephen Hetherington — «Good Knowledge, Bad Knowledge: On Two Dogmas of Epistemology»

Stephen Hetherington — «Self-Knowledge: Beginning Philosophy Right Here and Now»

Stephen Hetherington — «Yes, But How Do You Know?: Introducing Philosophy Through Sceptical Ideas»

Rupert Read — «Philosophy for Life: Applying Philosophy in Politics and Culture»

Кристофер Белшоу, Гэри Кэмп (под редакцией) — «12 ведущих философов современности»
-->
<!-- lint disable write-good -->
1. Bruce Michael, Barbone Steve — Just the Arguments. 100 of the Most Important Arguments in Western Philosophy (Wiley, 2011).pdf
<!-- lint enable write-good -->

<a id="Лексиконы-философских-суеверий"></a>
## Лексиконы философских суеверий

<!--- [ACADEMIC_DEGREE] «1928-31 Stud. der Philosophie in Freiburg, 1931-36 Stud. der Theologie in Rom, 1938 Habilitation in Philosophie in Krakau. 1934-40 Prof. für Logik am Angelicum in Rom. 1939-45 Feldgeistlicher bei den poln. Truppen (u.a. Italienfeldzug). 1950-70 Begründer und erster Rektor der kath. Polenmission in der Schweiz. 1945-72 Prof. für neuzeitl. und zeitgenöss. Philosophie an der Univ. Freiburg (1964-66 Rektor), 1957 Gründer des Osteuropa-Instituts der Universität» — https://hls-dhs-dss.ch/de/articles/041117/2011-02-17/ . Имеется профессорская кафедра.

[NOTE] Цитаты из книги: «Гуманизм враж­ дебен всякой логике, всякому разуму, всякой естественной науке, которую он считает «механи­ ческим» трудом, недостойным культурного чело­ века, призванного быть писателем, ритором, по­ литиком.», «ГУМАНИЗМ. Вероятно, самый распростра­ ненный сегодня предрассудок. Господствует мне­ние, что можно быть кем угодно, но нельзя быть не-гуманистом. В гуманизм веруют огромное число проповедников, политиков, философов, журналистов и т. п. Если же вы в него не верите, то вы низкий варвар. В действительности гума­низм не что иное, как постыдное суеверие.

[BOOK_SERIES] Библиотека журнала Путь

[TYPE_PHIL][NO_SOURCES] -->
1. Бохеньский Юзеф Мария — Сто суеверий. Краткий философский словарь предрассудков (Прогресс, 1993).pdf

<a id="Постмодерн"></a>
## Постмодерн

<a id="Паранаучность-эстетствующих-философов-иррационалистов"></a>
### Паранаучность эстетствующих философов-иррационалистов

<!--- [ACADEMIC_DEGREE] Сокал Ph.D. in physics at Princeton — https://mtt.org/profile/alan-sokal/ ; Брикмон — PhD Universit ́e catholique de Louvain (Belgium) — http://www.iea.usp.br/pessoas/JBricmontCVANGLAIScourt.pdf

[BOOK_SUPPORT] Программа Центрально-Европейского Университета «Translation Project» при поддержке Института «Открытое общество»

[ACADEMIC_DEGREE_TRANSLATOR] Кралечкин Дмитрий Юрьевич — кандидат философских наук — https://www.dissercat.com/content/fundamentalnoe-razlichie-bytiya-i-sushchego-kak-sposob-obosnovaniya-ontologii ; Костикова Анна Анатольевна — кандидат философских наук — https://philos.msu.ru/node/115

[POSITIVE_OR_NEUTRAL_REVIEW][REVIEW_LONG][REVIEW_HIGH_POSITIVE] Гобозов Иван Аршакович, доктор философских наук ( https://philos.msu.ru/node/221 ) — https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/ochen-svoevremennaya-kniga-sokal-a-brikmon-zh-intellektualnye-ulovki-kritika-sovremennoy-filosofii-postmoderna-per-s-angl-a-kostikovoy-i-d/pdf — «Поэтому надо разоблачать постмодернистские уловки, показать, как это делают Сокал и Брикмон, что постмодернизм тянет философию назад, что в современную сложную и противоречивую эпоху не иррационализм, а рационализм может способствовать прогрессу общества и научных знаний»

[REVIEW_ANOTHER] William G. Faris, professor of mathematics at the University of Arizona — https://www.ams.org/notices/199807/review-faris.pdf . В рецензии много уходов в сторону, не связанных непосредственно с книгой.

Ks. Andrzej Makaro, doktorant Katedry Historii Filozofii Nowożytnej i Współczesnej KUL — https://ojs.tnkul.pl/index.php/rf/article/download/13538/13345 — «ie są to poglądy szczególnie oryginalne i odkrywcze. Podziela je zapewne więk-szość ludzi czynnie zajmujących się nauką, dopóki nie zaczną filozofować. Rozdział poświęcony relatywizmowi poznawczemu w filozofii nauki również nie przynosi nowa-torskich rozwiązań. Jest to zdecydowanie najsłabsza partia książki. Widać wyraźnie, że Sokal i Bricmont zdecydowanie lepsi są w szczegółowych analizach, niż w szeroko za-krojonych syntezach.», «Klucz do odpowiedzi na to pytanie leży być może w niespójnych deklaracjach autorów na temat tego, czego dowieść chcieli. Raz bowiem piszą, że celem ich jest wyłącznie wykazanie, iż postmodernistyczni intelektualiści nadużywająw swych publikacjach pojęć z zakresu nauk ścisłych, co jednak nie podważa pozostałej części ich twórczości (s. 10). Kilka stronic dalej deklarują zaś wprost: „To właśnie jest naszym celem – chcemy powiedzieć, że król jest nagi” (s. 19).»

[REVIEW_HIGH_POSITIVE][REVIEW_LONG][REVIEW_META] Jairo José da Silva, UNESP — http://pepsic.bvsalud.org/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1517-24302004000100005 — «Mas quem quer que leia com atenção e sem parti pris o livro de Sokal e Bricmont há de reconhecer, se não lhe falta honestidade intelectual, que os autores são extremamente cautelosos com suas críticas, sempre muito bem focadas e substanciadas, evitando generalizações indevidas e extrapolações indesejadas, e que, além disso, ambos identificam-se como homens de esquerda, que até simpatizam com certos objetivos da crítica cultural, mas que se recusam a cooptar com métodos desonestos de convencimento (que não podem ser chamados de argumentação), erros grosseiros e mistificação desenfreada.», «Segundo Jesus de Paula Assis, Sokal confundiu indevidamente esses dois relativismos, jogando na mesma vala comum Feyerabend e Derrida. Ademais, segundo o autor, Sokal escolheu um adversário fraco para o seu "experimento", já que, ainda segundo ele, Social Text é uma revista inexpressiva nas áreas de filosofia e sociologia da ciência. Há outras críticas pertinentes nesse artigo de Jesus de Paula Assis. De fato, não se pode negar, como ele acha que Sokal nega, que há estudos sérios sobre os condicionantes sociais da produção científica.»

[REVIEW_LONG] Robert F. Barsky, University of Western Ontario — https://sci-hub.se/10.2307/3685422 — «Alan Sokal's hoax has served as a protest against the collapse in standards of scholarship and intellectual responsibility with which vast sectors of the humanities and social sciences are currently afflicted. Significantly, some of the most biting commentary has come from distinguished voices on the Left, showing that when it comes to transgressions as basic as these, political alliances offer no protection.», «Much of the discussion has centered on remarks by Julia Kristeva, who suggested to Le Nouvel observateur that the Sokal business was in fact part of a growing anti-French politico-economic campaign», «Sokal and Bricmont don't render any services when they tell us to keep out because we're too stupid to understand what's going on, and they don't support the Left by telling people what to think or how to interpret the world.»

[BOOK_OR_AUTHOR_OR_CONCEPT_CRITICISM][REVIEW_LONG] Костикова Анна Анатольевна, кандидат философских наук (переводчик книги) — https://www.ruthenia.ru/logos/number/1999_04/1999_4_14.htm — «Исходя из этого подобраны и объекты критики, это прежде всего те “классики” новейшей французской философии, которые так или иначе касались вопросов точных наук. Хотя здесь сразу стоило бы оговориться, поскольку есть повод “поймать за руку” самих критиков. В разряд иррационалистов и противников науки попадают философы принципиально отличающие свое понимание науки: Бруно Лятур, занимающийся социологией науки, действительно, в своей книге “Наука в действии” определяет науку как миф, социальный конструкт и даже не рассматривает вопрос об истинности научных концепций, но Ж. Лакану и Ю. Кристевой свойственны использование научной аргументации как престижной и самоценной.», «Несмотря на все оговорки, неутешительные выводы “узкокритического” анализа использования научных терминов, А. Сокал и Ж. Брикмон распространяют на все философское произведение в целом.», «Действительно, аргументы против Ю. Кристевой выглядят наиболее несправедливо. Во-первых, в поле критики попала работа 1967 года, студенческая статья Кристевой в журнале “Тель Кель”. Во-вторых, некорректно судить по одной-двум работам обо всей концепции в целом. В-третьих, именно к ней относятся такие явно оценочные рассуждения и сравнения типа “более эрудированная в математике, чем Лакан”, “более поверхностная, чем Лакан, в своих суждениях”.», «Есть один аспект выводов А. Сокала и Ж. Брикмона, с которыми, к счастью, а, может быть, к сожалению, трудно согласиться содержательно. Речь идет о том, что по мнению авторов книги, экспортируемая из Франции философия перечисленных авторов питает движения, которые, с точки зрения А. Сокала и Ж. Брикмона, могли обойтись без философии — это движения феминизма, черного американского большинства, сексуальных меньшинств, этнических культур и так далее.», «В целом, дискуссия — еще один повод для гордости французов своей национальной философией.»

Christian Ghasarian, Institut d’ethnologie, Université de Neuchâtel, Suisse — https://journals.openedition.org/lhomme/86 — «Comme le souligne parfaitement Yves Jeanneret, Sokal « devient auteur sans avoir à exposer et argumenter ses idées, simplement en désignant le discours des autres » (p. 154). C’est, paradoxalement, en déconstruisant la renommée de ses « cibles » qu’il sort de l’anonymat et atteint la célébrité.», «La confusion s’étend d’autant plus que l’on trouve sur le banc des accusés tous les détracteurs de la modernité (les études culturelles, les postmodernes, la pensée New Age, une certaine gauche intellectuelle, etc.), empêtrés dans le relativisme, la démission politique, l’ignorance scientifique, l’obscurité stylistique, etc., ce qui fait beaucoup de monde… Confusion aussi du fait que les accusés vont eux-mêmes s’enfermer dans le piège tendu par Sokal et, pour se défendre, se renvoyer mutuellement les accusations (le style pédant, la faiblesse argumentative, etc.) dont ils sont l’objet. Du coup, la place de l’accusé est vide et on se demande sur quoi porte vraiment le débat…», «Contre cette logique de l’oubli, Yves Jeanneret a entrepris une relecture des textes initiaux pour mieux comprendre comment, à partir de la mystification des éditeurs d’une revue, on est passé à la question de savoir si les intellectuels français sont des «imposteurs». Il en arrive à la conclusion qu’il s’agit plus d’une « querelle » que d’une « affaire », et que celle-ci relève d’abord d’un phénomène de « trivialité ». La trivialité a pour caractéristique de simplifier les choses.»

[REVIEW_LONG][REVIEW_META] Jean-Philippe Bouilloud, professor at the Ecole Supérieure de Commerce de Paris ESCP-EAP — https://sci-hub.se/10.1177/0048393102250309 — «First of all, there is the “experiment” conducted by Sokal (1996b) inSocial Text: to say that he abused an American journal is not in itselfenough, for that simply displays a major dysfunction in the evalua-tion process of articles submitted to the journal (Wacquant 1997;Latour 1997; Lynch 1998; Jeanneret 1998; Jurdant 1998; Le Bras 1997)and would not disqualify the whole logic of “cultural studies,” as theincriminated journal does not depict itself as a scientific model», «Furthermore, it has been noted (Lévy-Leblond 1998; Lynch 1998;Salanskis 1998; Mermin 1998; Fixari 1998; Charraud 1998) that Sokaland Bricmont assimilate the texts that are difficult to understand6tomeaningless texts, which leads them to disregard numerous authors,7from Hegel to Lacan or Deleuze», «Yet considering science as objective (Bricmont 1997b), Sokal and Bricmont do not conceive the specific particularities of the social sciences.», «But Sokal and Bricmont were suspected of referring to the most extreme and reductionist “socialstudies” texts, to back their theory and henceforth support a “futilesquabble”», «It is a salutary debate, yet one whose own ambiguities and approximations tend to disqualify (Brian 1998). In fact, it ignores the real questions. At least one cancredit it with having opened up a vast reflection on scientism and the image of science within the social sciences. Beyond this, it is perhaps necessary to take seriously Sokal and Bricmont’ repeated confessionthat they do not really understand the social sciences.»

[REVIEW_LONG] André Assi Barreto, Mestrando em Filosofia pela Universidade de São Paulo — https://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/article/download/513/234/1457 — «Nós acreditamos que qualquer trabalho acadêmico que se preze, que pretenda ser levado a sério pela comunidade acadêmica, deve primar pela clareza e pelo rigor e, consequentemente, evitar todo tipo de obscuridade, de ambiguidade e de suscetibilidade aos preconceitos e subjetividades daquele que escreve.»

[ADDITIONAL_READING] Michel de Pracontal — «L’imposture scientifique en dix leçons»

Laurie Calhoun — Philosophy Unmasked. A Skeptic’s Critique

Laurie Calhoun — Theodicy. A Metaphilosophical Investigation

[NO_SCEDRECO] -->
1. [Сокал Ален](https://as.nyu.edu/content/nyu-as/as/faculty/alan-sokal.html), [Брикмон Жан](https://uclouvain.be/fr/repertoires/jean.bricmont) — Интеллектуальные уловки. Критика современной философии постмодерна (Дом интеллектуальной книги, 2002).pdf

<a id="Философия-повседневных-вещей"></a>
## Философия повседневных вещей

<a id="NR-72"></a>
### NR

<a id="Психоанализ"></a>
#### Психоанализ

<!--- [INFO] В книге многократно говорится о психоанализе, при это автор не заявляет о критическом к нему отношении. Статьи о паранаучности психоанализа — https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/cross-check/why-freud-should-be-dead/ , https://sci-hub.se/10.1521/pdps.2018.46.1.115 , https://sci-hub.se/https://www.jstor.org/stable/20482837 -->
1. [Корнев Вячеслав Вячеславович](https://www.sut.ru/teaching/ft/fakultetgf/kafedra-sotsialno-politicheskikh-nauk/kaf-socnauk-sostav/kornev-vyacheslav-vyacheslavovich) — Философия повседневных вещей (Юнайтед Пресс, 2011).pdf

<a id="Философские-понятия-и-термины"></a>
## Философские понятия и термины

<!--- [INFO] Научный редактор — Александр Прокофьевич Поляков — http://www.hrono.ru/biograf/bio_p/polyakovalpr.php

[ADDITIONAL_READING] Канке Виктор Андреевич — Философия для психологов

[DUPLICATE_GI]

[NO_OCR] -->
1. [Конт-Спонвиль Андре](https://catalogue.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/cb120126014.public) — Философский словарь (Этерна, 2012).pdf

<a id="Философствование"></a>
## Философствование

1. [Рассел Бертран](https://w.histrf.ru/articles/article/show/rassiel_biertran) — Искусство мыслить (Идея—Пресс, Дом интеллектуальной книги, 1999).pdf
<!--- [ADDITIONAL_READING] Michael A Bishop — «Epistemology and the Psychology of Human Judgment» -->

<a id="Химия"></a>
# Химия

<a id="Химические-мифы"></a>
## Химические мифы

<!--- [ACADEMIC_DEGREE] Kovács, [University of Szeged, CV](http://www.mdche.u-szeged.hu/~kovacs/klcv_en.html) — «1989 — Ph.D. in Organic Chemistry, L. Kossuth University, Debrecen, Hungary»

Dezső, [Personal site CV](https://sites.google.com/a/pharmacognosy.hu/csupor-dezso/upcoming-seminars) — «PhD, Szegedi Tudományegyetem Gyógyszertudományok Doktori Iskola, 2007. Doktori értekezés címe: Investigation of the diterpene alkaloids of Aconitum species native to the Carpathian Basin»

Lente, [Meet the Scientist, CV](https://www.meetthescientist.hu/download/cv_lente.pdf) — «2001 — Ph.D. fokozat (Debreceni Egyetem), tudományág: kémia, minősítés: Summa Cum Laude, 2008 — Habilitáció (Debreceni Egyetem)»

Gunda, [University of Debrecen](http://web.unideb.hu/~tgunda/gunda1a.htm) — «1984 – Ph.D. degree (Thesis: Preparations of cephalosporins and other β-lactam derivatives from penicillin), 1998 – Habilitation at the Lajos Kossuth University of Debrecen, Hungary, 2000 – Doctor of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences (D. Sc.)»

[BOOK_CITATIONS] «Carson and her followers also share some responsibility for helping to develop public chemophobia (→ 1.1) and encourage a hysterical approach toward chemicals.»

[BOOK_SUPPORT] European Social Fund under the project ENVIKUT

[CRIM_BIBLIOGRAPHY_END]

[Kr/MA]

[POSITIVE_OR_NEUTRAL_REVIEW][REVIEW_HIGH_POSITIVE] Reiner Salzer, Department of Chemistry, Dresden University of Technology, [Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry](https://sci-hub.se/https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00216-015-8576-7) — «This book is uniquein its scope, a comprehensive collection of often-heard mis-conceptions and/or misunderstandings of chemical, physico-chemical, and biochemical phenomena in daily life», «It uses plausible explanations to argue againstdemonising chemistry. The authors rejected any populistremarks and restricted themselves to the facts. Thismakes the reading particularly pleasant», «This book should have appeared years ago. It pro-vides a comprehensive collection of explanations for occur-rences all around us.»

[REVIEW_RETELLING][REVIEW_ONE_PAGE] Rose Agnès Jacquesy, [L’actualité chimique](https://new.societechimiquedefrance.fr/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/l-396.pdf) — «Voilà un livre qui répond à de multiplescuriosités, avec une gradation intelli-gente des difficultés, donc à la portéedu plus grand nombre. À recommander.»

[REVIEW_ANOTHER] Леенсон Илья Абрамович, [Химия и жизнь](https://www.hij.ru/read/our-serials/chem-myths/9000/)

[ADDITIONAL_READING] Rita Saleh — «Chemophobia Today»

Joe Schwarcz — «Is That a Fact?: Frauds, Quacks, and the Real Science of Everyday Life»

Joe Schwarcz — «Grain of Salt: The Science and Pseudoscience of What We Eat»

Joe Schwarcz — «The Right Chemistry: 108 Enlightening, Nutritious, Health-Conscious and Occasionally Bizarre Inquiries into the Science of Daily Life»

Джо Шварц — «Загадки современной химии. Правда и домыслы»

[FAIL_BIBLIOGRAPHY][BOOK_FILE_WITH_BIBLIOGRAPHY] «Kovács Lajos, Csupor Dezső, Lente Gábor, Gunda Tamás — 100 Chemical Myths꞉ Misconceptions, Misunderstandings, Explanations (Springer, 2014)»

[NO_SCANNED_PDF][NO_SCEDRECO] -->
1. Kovács Lajos, Csupor Dezső, Lente Gábor, Gunda Tamás — Száz ​kémiai mítosz꞉ Tévhitek, félreértések, magyarázatok (Akadémiai Kiadó, 2017).pdf

<a id="Ценности"></a>
# Ценности

<a id="Смысл-жизни"></a>
## Смысл жизни

<a id="Эмпирические-исследования-смыслов-жизни"></a>
### Эмпирические исследования смыслов жизни

<!--- [ACADEMIC_DEGREE] [Florida State University, CV](http://www.fsu.edu/cvdb/RBAUMEISTER.rtf) — «1978	Ph.D., Princeton University. Major: Psychology.»

[CRIM_SPEAKER] https://ed.ted.com/on/zeX2vGg8

[Is/Mono]

[POSITIVE_OR_NEUTRAL_REVIEW][REVIEW_ONE_PAGE] Pierre Hegy, Adelphi University, [American Journal of Sociology](https://sci-hub.se/10.2307/2781206) — «It is only fair to review the achievement in the light of its goals and aspirations, and, in my opinion, the author has succeeded pretty well.», «These pages describe a common tendency to assume that life has one single purpose or an overarching central meaning. I am not convinced that such a tendency is best described as a "myth."», «The main thesis of the book is that in recent times, the self has become our ultimate value base. This thesis, however, does not articulate the description of the four needs of meaning. Having opted for an empirical study of meaning, the author has given up any theoretical context into which to integrate empirical findings.», «If one looks for answers (title of pt. 2), one is likely to be disappointed. This book raises many more questions than it can answer.», «Yet this work is as challenging for the reader as it has been for the writer.», «One may argue that the question of meaning belongs to psychology more than to any other discipline; yet the thesis of the self as the base value points to a new direction: the study of values as "core" of any curriculum. It is to this core that Baumeister makes a valuable contribution.»

[REVIEW_ONE_PAGE] Maigret Éric, [Archives de sciences sociales des religions](https://www.persee.fr/docAsPDF/assr_0335-5985_1994_num_86_1_1443_t1_0264_0000_4.pdf) — «cet ouvrage représente une contribution de valeur la question du sens dans les sociétés contemporaines Il présente et résume en outre une importante littérature empirique concernant ce sujet tant en psycho logie en sociologie»

[ADDITIONAL_READING] Kathleen D. Vohs, Roy F. Baumeister — «Handbook of Self-Regulation: Research, Theory, and Applications»

Kathleen D. Vohs, Roy F. Baumeister — «Encyclopedia of Social Psychology»

Рой Баумайстер, Джон Тирни — «Сила воли. Возьми свою жизнь под контроль»

Roy F. Baumeister — «Is There Anything Good About Men?: How Cultures Flourish by Exploiting Men»

Susan Wolf — «Meaning in Life and Why It Matters»

Laurie Ann Paul — «Tranformative experience»

Batthyany Alexander, Pninit Russo-Netzer (by editing) — «Meaning in Positive and Existential Psychology»

Robert N. Bellah et al. — «Habits of the Heart: Individualism and Commitment in American Life»

Christopher Lasch — «The Culture of Narcissism»

Stanley Cohen — Escape Attempts: The Struggle of Resistance in Everyday Life

Роберт Пфаллер — Ради чего стоит жить. Начала материалистической философии

[NO_SCANNED_PDF][NO_SCEDRECO] -->
1. Baumeister Roy F. — Meanings of Life (The Guilford Press, 1991).pdf

<a id="Человек"></a>
# Человек

<a id="Вопрошание"></a>
## Вопрошание

<a id="Насущные-вопросы"></a>
### Насущные вопросы

<!--- [ACADEMIC_DEGREE] [University of Virginia, CV](https://president.virginia.edu/about-president/curriculum-vitae) — «University of Virginia School of Law, J.D., May 1992»

[CRIM_BESTSELLER] [University of Virginia](https://news.virginia.edu/content/2018-virginia-festival-book-adds-uva-president-elect-james-e-ryan-lineup) — «he published it as a book, “Wait, What? And Life’s Other Essential Questions,” at the urging of a HarperCollins editor, and it quickly made the New York Times Best-Sellers list.»

[N/TMas]

[ADDITIONAL_READING] J.T. Dillon — «The Practice of Questioning»

Dan Rotstein, Luz Santana — «Make Just One Change: Teach Students to Ask Their Own Questions»

Щедровицкий Георгий Павлович — «Избранные труды»

Хэл Грегерсен — «Вопросы — это ответы»

Thomas Hurka — «The Best Things in Life: A Guide to What Really Matters»

[CRIM_NO_REFS][NO_SCEDRECO][NO_PDF][NO_REVIEW] -->
1. Райан Джеймс Э. — Погодите, как вы сказали？ И другие вопросы жизненной важности (Манн, Иванов и Фербер, 2018).epub

<a id="Сила-вопрошания"></a>
### Сила вопрошания

<a id="NR-73"></a>
#### NR

<a id="НЛП-бэкграунд"></a>
##### НЛП-бэкграунд

<!--- [NOTE] НЛП 

[NO_SCANNNED_PDF] -->
1. [Бергер Уоррен](https://www.macmillanspeakers.com/warrenberger) — Красивый вопрос. Как неординарные вопросы приводят к гениальным идеям (Попурри, 2014).fb2

<a id="Гениальность"></a>
## Гениальность

<a id="Многофакторный-анализ-гениальности"></a>
### Многофакторный анализ гениальности

<!--- [ACADEMIC_DEGREE] PhD Social Psychology, Harvard University — https://simonton.faculty.ucdavis.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/243/2021/01/SimontonCV.pdf

[ADDITIONAL_READING] Dean Keith Simonton — «The Wiley Handbook of Genius»

Карри Мейсон — Режим гения. Распорядок дня великих людей

[NO_PDF][NO_SCEDRECO][NO_REVIEW] 

[BOOK_SERIES] МИФ Креатив
-->
1. [Саймонтон Дин Кит](https://simonton.faculty.ucdavis.edu/) — Чек-лист гения. Девять парадоксов одарённости (Манн, Иванов и Фербер, 2020).epub

<a id="Поколения"></a>
## Поколения

<a id="iGen"></a>
### iGen

<a id="NR-74"></a>
#### NR

<a id="Недостоверная-информация-13"></a>
##### Недостоверная информация

<!--- [Ad/Mass]

[ACADEMIC_DEGREE] [San Diego State University, CV](https://www.psychology.sdsu.edu/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/Twenge-vita-2017.pdf) — «Ph.D. in Psychology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, 1998»

[CRIM_SPEAKER] [Official site](http://www.jeantwenge.com/speaking/)

[NO_SCEDRECO][CRIM_FEEDBACK_IN_BOOK]

[POSITIVE_OR_NEUTRAL_REVIEW][REVIEW_RETELLING] Dr Dominika Sozańska, Instytut Spraw Społecznych UP, Homo et Societas, [Sprawozdania i recenzje](https://www.ejournals.eu/pliki/art/16851/pl) — «Kontekst dotyczy wprawdzie społeczeństwa amerykańskiego, jednak może stanowić dobry punkt odniesienia dla badań europejskich i polskich.»

Roksana Maria Zdunek, Jagellonian University, [Annales Universitatis Mariae Curie-Skłodowska](https://www.journals.umcs.pl/k/article/download/11641/8582) — «The great value of the publication is its interdisciplinary nature, whereby it can gain a wide audience.», «A very important aspect of the text is that the author is not categorical in her argument. Despite citing a lot of disturbing data about the young generation, Jean M. Twenge is far from antagonizing or evaluating, which is an indisputable advantage of the publication.», «Foreign readers may be disappointed by stopping analyzes within the United States.», «Comparisons to Europe as a whole seem to be overly generalizing, as for instance in this case of religiosity», «No source was indicated and Europe is, in my opinion, too broad benchmark, highly varied within its borders», «To sum up, in addition to media researchers, psychologists and sociologists, the publication will be useful for parents, educators, leaders and members of iGen themselves. It will contribute to a better understanding of the needs, dreams and problems of young people – political, social and economic ones. The discussed book has also a value for the political elite – on the basis of the presented data, it is possible to forecast future patterns of political participation of citizens, assuming as an important factor the transformation of society and democracy resulting from the development of new technologies.»

[REVIEW_RETELLING][REVIEW_LONG] Анита Андреевна Поплавская, аспирант факультета социальных наук, аналитик Центра внутреннего мониторинга НИУ ВШЭ, [Экономическая социология](https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/chto-my-znaem-o-molodyozhi-xxi-veka-amerikanskie-podrostki-glazami-psihologa-retsenziya-na-knigu-tvenge-d-2019-pokolenie-i-pochemu-pokolenie/pdf) — «Безусловно, базовой теорией, на которую опирается Джин Твенге в своей книге, является теория поколений. Однако развёрнутого анализа данной теории в книге нет.», «Добавление качественной методологии, безусловно, позволяет увидеть за цифрами реальных людей, глубже понять количественные данные, описать смыслы, которые молодёжь вкладывает в те или иные свои ответы. Однако ни гайда, ни подробного описания респондентов, ни качественного анализа интервью в книге исследователь не даёт. А это необходимо было сделать, так как непредвзятому читателю может показаться, что точки зрения отдельных людей отражают мнения тех или иных молодёжных групп американского общества, что неверно.», «Рецензируемая книга является хорошим примером широкого и глубокого погружения в анализ доступных количественных и качественных данных. При отсутствии чёткой теоретической рамки исследования автору удаётся не только выявить и объяснить многие межпоколенческие различия, но и описать общий контекст, на фоне которого (а скорее, в котором) происходит слом фундаментальных ценностей, самоощущения и поведения современных подростков.», «Книга Джин Твенге заканчивается оптимистичным призывом понять подрастающее поколение, помочь ему в становлении, подстраиваясь под него. Однако, углубляясь в текст книги и проведённый анализ, мы видим больше проблем, чем позитивных трендов. Кажется, что Твенге что-то недоговаривает, не учитывает или чего-то избегает.»

[REVIEW_RETELLING] Лебедева Тамара Васильевна, Субботин Александр Алексеевич, [Вестник Российского университета дружбы народов. Серия: Социология](https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/tsifrovoe-pokolenie/pdf) — «Методологические подходы и методические приемы, использованные Твенге, могут быть успешно применены российскими социологами (к сожалению, без аналогичных баз социологических данных, сформированных за десятилетия)», «Лишь в определенной мере можно согласиться с критикой А. А. Поплавской в адрес книги Твенге — об отсутствии четкой теоретической рамки исследования (развернутого анализа теории поколений [7. С. 86], концепции технологического детерминизма и др.), об увлечении эмпирикой [7. С. 87]. Книга была задумана Твенге как научно-популярное издание, рассчитанное на широкий круг заинтересованной аудитории, а не только на профессиональных социологов и научных работников.», «Она будет познавательна и полезна как родителям и преподавателям студентов и школьников, так и самим подросткам»

[REVIEW_PERSONAL_COMMENTS] Ненейтральные утверждения: «Также молодёжь почти одинаково одобряет социализм и капитализм (с. 357), видимо, не понимая сути социализма как государственного и общественного строя.», «При этом отмечается участие студентов и старших школьников в протестных движениях 2011–2013 годов и в несанкционированных митингах весной 2017 года»

[REVIEW_RETELLING] Agnieszka Całek, [Zeszyty Prasoznawcze](https://www.ejournals.eu/pliki/art/18722/) — «Publikacja Twenge to bardzo ciekawe opracowanie, z rzetelną metodologią, przy-noszące kompleksowy obraz amerykańskich postmilenialsów. Książka z pewnością jest wartościową, a przy tym dość lekką, lekturą dla medioznawców i wszystkich, którzy w jakimś aspekcie zajmują się w swojej pracy naukowej pokoleniem Z i jego praktykam»

[REVIEW_RETELLING] Amanda Williams, PhD, School of Human Environmental Sciences, University of Arkansas-Fayetteville, [Family and Consumer Sciences Research Journal](https://sci-hub.se/10.1111/fcsr.12345) — «To conclude, perhaps what I enjoyed most about reading this book is the “story”it tells connecting a wealth of cross-sectional and longitudinal data available on young people and technology to create a compelling narrative on the broader social culture»

Geoff Nichols, Management School, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK, [Leisure Studies](https://sci-hub.se/10.1080/02614367.2018.1429485) — «It has much broader implications for understanding how the development of young people, their leisure and the way they think, has changed from earlier generations.», «She does not draw on broader sociological explanations for the trends she has identified or make connections to leisure studies literature, and the book is written for a general audience.», «If a degree in leisure studies included a module on the impact of i technology this book would be a valuable resource.», «However, it is a valuable read for anyone affected by the growth of i technology; which is all of us!»

[BOOK_OR_AUTHOR_OR_CONCEPT_CRITICISM][REVIEW_SMASHER] Sonia Livingstone, The London School of Economics and Political Science, [Journal of Children and Media](https://eprints.lse.ac.uk/89730/1/Livingstone_iGen_Accepted.pdf) — «I shall suggest that Twenge’s interpretation of the ‘facts’ obscures an alternative – arguably better – account.», «Setting aside this odd account of childhood (usually thought of as a time of imaginative play and learning rather than high-maintenance self-absorption)», «Yet while the book compares iGen with the Millennial, Gen X and Boomer generations which preceded it, based on equivalent (historical) data from when they, too, were teenagers, nothing is said about those generations as adults, now the architects of the world in which iGen is growing up.», «Thus iGen emerges not only as ‘childish’ but also curiously decontextualized, unmoored from the wider society which is, in turn, tacitly freed of responsibility for a generation so ‘completely unprepared for adulthood.’», «Faced with an abundance of simple univariate trends in youth attitudes and practices, academic readers of iGen are likely to be frustrated both by the relative lack of multivariate analysis and of systematic consideration of alternative, potentially confounding or counterfactual explanations.», «Perhaps Twenge means such evidence to explain the apparent rise in individualism; certainly she communicates a dismay over the secularisation of the US. But none of this has much to do with the smartphone.», «Second, some graphs show no neat trend at all. (…) The graph for drug taking also bucks the trend – showing a decline to 1994 and an increase since; here Twenge works hard to interpret this as the act of a risk-averse generation who also believes marijuana to be safe. The notion that the recent upturn in teen suicide and decline in homicide (itself dwarfed by comparison with its peak in the 1990s, also seen in relation to sexual assault statistics) can be linked to the smartphone stretches the imagination too far.», «Third, driving and gaining a driver’s licence do show a gradual decline until the turn of the century and a sharper recent drop, but this occurs around the financial crash of 2008 rather than around 2011.», «Twenge interprets this as about kids preferring to be ferried about by their parents rather than, say, their inability to afford a car (…) Since the decline in going to the movies also began not in 2011 but around 2008, while the decline in party-going and going out to see friends began even earlier, consideration of disposable income – along with, maybe yes, growing internet use, and fearful parents – is surely warranted.», «There is also a gradual then recent dramatic drop in teens’ extrinsic and intrinsic motivations for school. (…) This seems plausible, inviting a wider socio-economic analysis of educational and labour market opportunities than we are offered.», «At least one trend is misleadingly presented. Under the heading ‘Generation Porn,’ Twenge quotes research from the University of New Hampshire showing high levels of exposure to online pornography in 2005 but she does not cite the 2010 research from the same group that shows a notable drop.», «Beyond the above problem with the actual finding, this explanation is odd, since vicarious or ‘safe’ sexual experience is neither part of most conceptions of childhood nor commensurate with the available research (which suggests that, far from being compensatory, online sexual experiences are positively correlated with offline sexual experiencesii).», «Here it seems likely that, as Twenge proposes, the advent of smartphones plays a role. But given the long-term decline that preceded the recent drop in independence, one might reverse her causality. Parents have long worried about teens going out, getting gradually more risk-averse as parental anxieties have been whipped up by the media (irrespective of the largely stable or even declining incidence of actual harm).», «Two experiments are cited to support this paragraph, although no detail is given in the book. So I checked them both out. (…) Setting aside the various nuances and complexities in the findings reported in each study, suffice to say that neither concerns teenagers, only the former concerns mental health or randomly assigned people to experience less (but not more) screen time, and neither measured effects over the years implied by the quote above (“those that track behavior over time”).», «Many will, nonetheless, judge it plausible that fear of missing out, oppressive exposure to the perfect lives of others, bullying and harassment are indeed all intensified in the digital age, with young teens especially vulnerable. But the research cite in this book does not evidence this, however plausible such a claim may be.», «And let’s not forget that the effects of socioeconomic and other pressures are felt not only by young people but also by their parents and the wider society, this too shaping the conditions in which young people live and the beliefs, emotions and values they develop.», «Reflecting on iGen’s arguments, we should distinguish the time trends actually revealed by the data from Twenge’s interpretation, including the role she attributes to the smartphone.», «In this wider context, we might conclude both that the smartphone is implicated (in ways that need to be better understood) and, also, that its much-heralded effects are unjustifiably exaggerated.», «Twenge gets more speculative when she switches focus from the causes to the consequences of being a member of iGen.», «Now she does hold parents responsible for overprotecting their children (though without, in turn, asking why parenting has also changed, considering neither their economic struggles nor the US culture of litigation nor the increasing institutionalized responsibilisation of individuals).», «Still, she captures something of today’s concerns, albeit through rather extreme summaries (‘In brief: money is in, and meaning is out’; p.167) or simplistic explanations little supported by available evidence», «But the lack of a wider frame makes it easy to blame young people for their own problems», «These seem harsh judgements to make of 17-year-olds who, we have seen, have experienced a decline in their disposable income and a rise in personal debt, on the one hand and, on the other, considerable frustrations at the societal constraints on their voice and efficacy, including online.», «But this is surely less to do with the smartphone than with wider cultural, economic and policy developments.», «Indeed, perhaps the value of a book such as iGen is that it provokes attention to and debate around our field, opening the door to further critical interrogation of the available data, consideration of alternative explanations, and wider deliberation over the big picture within which researchers and practitioners variously position our contributions. Indeed, perhaps the value of a book such as iGen is that it provokes attention to and debate around our field, opening the door to further critical interrogation of the available data, consideration of alternative explanations, and wider deliberation over the big picture within which researchers and practitioners variously position our contributions.», «Putting down the phone, in and of itself, is hardly going to solve young people’s problems nor help them face the future.»

[REVIEW_LONG] Alessandra Reccia, [L’Ospite ingrato](https://www.ospiteingrato.unisi.it/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/6.3.-RECCIA.pdf) — «Su alto fronte, nonostante Twenge assicuri che il profilo che se ne ricava sia trasversale ai gruppi socio-economici e etnici, è alto il sospetto che questo ritratto dell’iper-connesso corrisponda, in realtà, a quello del teenager delle classi medie.», «Tuttavia, non può essere negato, intanto, che strumenti come la Xbox o la Playstation non sono alla portata di tutte le famiglie, così come non tutti sostengono un abbonamento mensile a Netflix. In secondo luogo, che nonostante i pagamenti rateali, l’indebitamento o gli sconti sui prodotti di seconda mano rendano accessibili la strumentazione digitale a fette sempre più ampie di popolazione, il gap sociale non si gioca tanto sul possesso dei mezzi, ma sulla capacità di controllarne e gestirne l’uso e finalizzarlo alla personale promozione economica e sociale.», «Tuttavia, i dati che ci fornisce la Twenge delineano, ancora una volta, una tendenza generale, ed effettivamente trasversale, che riguarda la frammentazione sociale su base etnica nelle società occidentali.», «In questa esigenza generazionale, la sociologa non vede mai, come però suo malgrado suggerisce, una introiezione, da parte dei soggetti, del sistema di controllo diffuso esercitato dai social e riprodotto nelle relazioni sociali, dalla scuola alla famiglia ai contesti informali.», «Infatti, più che agli adolescenti di cui parla, il libro è destinato ai genitori e alle istituzioni universitarie, ma soprattutto alle aziende e alle società di marketing.», «Nel libro non si sospetta quindi una relazione tra gli effetti dell’iperconnessione e il contesto socio-economico di riferimento.», «Gli iGen hanno infatti tra i lori punti di forza un forte spirito pratico, che se unito all’importanza che danno al concetto di sicurezza – ovviamente emendato degli aspetti patologici che attualmente presenta – potrebbe contribuire alla formazione di un modello positivo di cittadino e lavoratore del futuro.», «In queste conclusioni individuiamo un limite importante del libro, che non sta tanto nella tipologia dei consigli, alcuni dei quali potrebbero anche risultare sensati e praticabili. Ma piuttosto, nel fatto di non sospettare che gli effetti del comportamento degli adolescenti siano riflessi della struttura ideologica del capitalismo attuale e non un suo danno collaterale.», «l carattere utopico del progressismo della Twenge non tiene conto, inoltre, di alcune semplici considerazioni. La prima fra tutte è che in genere, ad esempio, in un sistema di produzione di tipo capitalistico, notoriamente non è l’azienda che si preoccupa di trattenere il lavoratore.», «Ma, soprattutto, additando nei comportamenti assunti dagli adolescenti le cause del loro stesso malessere e di quello sociale, presente e futuro, finisce per confondere cause ed effetti. Così, ad esempio, i problemi di salute mentale, che stanno tanto a cuore alla Twenge, in questo tipo di ragionamento sono destinati alla semplice medicalizzazione, perché sono trattati per se stessi e non come scompensi strutturali, ovvero contraddizioni tra individuo e società»

[REVIEW_IN_MEDIA] 李明翰, [The News Lens](https://www.thenewslens.com/article/134149) — «但是，長時間上網導致憂鬱這個論點，也受到一些批評», «然而，我認為本書也有許多值得批判之處。「使用螢幕時間增加，導致心理不健康的比例增加」這個對統計結果的詮釋太過簡化，因為有可能是另外一個因素導致兩者同時增加。», «然而，作者顯然沒有進行這種細膩的分析，僅將諸多問題歸咎3C的普及使用。», «長期關注兒童與媒體互動、任教於倫敦政治經濟學院的社會心理學教授Sonia Livingstone就表示，Twenge整本書的數據詮釋錯誤百出，缺少多變因的分析以及整體社會結構的框架思考。Livingstone指出，我們別忘了，i世代所處的社會正是前幾個世代共同打造的。», «Livingstone更犀利地指出，將i世代貼上長不大、脆弱或幼稚等去脈絡化的標籤，其實是巧妙地逃避身為上一個世代應該負的集體責任。», «西門菲莎大學人類學教授Marilyn Gates則指出，這種大眾心理學的書籍似乎太過迎合主流市場，而傾向把複雜的現象過分簡化（overgeneralization）。許多書中指出的「因果關係」（causation）充其量只是「相關性」（correlation），他刻意忽略更顯著的變因，只為了呈現圖表上瞬間變化的量。», «《i世代報告》仍然值得我們一讀，它讓我們看見世代的差異，也推翻一些既有想像。雖然本書在描述美國的現象，但台灣讀者看到某些趨勢或許也會深感共鳴。書中的大量圖表也能讓人一目了然，讀起來不會太費力。»

Dane S. Claussen, Thiel College, Greenville, PA, [Journalism & Mass Communication Educator](https://sci-hub.se/10.1177/1077695818758107) — «But the book can be criticized: She sometimes takes correlation as causation, she interviewed only 23 millennials, a (very) small sample size, and some changes she points to have not been large or quick», « Of course, a big problem with these statistics, which Twenge omits, is that iGen Americans still consume large amounts of content that are produced by legacy newspaper and magazine companies while usually not even noticing, let alone caring, about original sources and their credibility.»

Joshan Rodrigues, Archdiocese of Bombay, Mumbai, India, [Church, Communication and Culture](https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/23753234.2018.1429223?needAccess=true) — «Jean Twenge’s latest work on the ‘smartphone’generation is another in a long line of recent popular reads that paints the internet and smartphones in shades of grey and basically ascribes them the blame for all the present generation’s ills.», «Twenge draws her conclusion right at the start and then goes about collecting evidence to support her claims, at the same time, not presenting any other evidence that may seem to be contradictory.», «This book may also have consultant value, since she speaks on how best to understand iGen, their buying habits online and their employment expectations.», «Viewing the younger generation in apocalyptic and dystopian terms has always been common practice right through history and now is no different. This time, according to Twenge, the villain is ‘smartphones’.», «Though she does identify other causative factors such as parenting, technology, education, media, economics and culture, she dismisses them to maintain that smartphone use has been the primary reason for the abrupt shift in teens’social behaviour and emotional states.», «This attribution appears to be largely coincidental, with no scientific study conclusively proving her thesis for cause-effect. However, the author says no other satisfactory explanations are forthcoming to explain this shift», «The book is peppered with half-page statistical graphs drawn from these different surveys mentioned above, which support her narrative and give the book an aura of conviction.», «However, surveys and statistics can be selected to support one’s hypothesis and a genuine absence of considering any other influencing factors on iGen, makes the book seem a bit reductionist. Her study is also confined to North America, which makes one wonder whether iGen’ers in other parts of the world are also showing similar trends», «Here too, her argument has a disconnect, when she says that iGen’ers view religion more logically rather than emotionally, while in the preceeding chapters she refers to iGen’ers as being extremely emotional, especially when it comes ‘Safe Spaces’and their tolerance towards different viewpoints.», «An interesting point is that smartphone use makes an appearance in every chapter of the book, save one! The one on Religion and Spirituality. Here, her hypothesis is at its weakest, since smartphone use doesn’t seem to be related to iGen being the most irreligious generation till date», «Her definition of the growth curve from adolescence to adulthood is also debatable», «This view is highly subjective and generational as she sees the iGen tendency for security and safe behaviour as symptomatic of a delayed adulthood.», «Once again, in all the 10 trends that Twenge describes about iGen, the evidence seems more coincidental than causative. Has cell phone use really caused these generational shifts? The verdict stands on shaky grounds. All that can be said is that these phenomena have been observed at the same time as when smartphone use became mainstream. If so, is the data she provides really representative of all iGen’ers?», «On the other hand, Jean Twenge’s exceptionally well-written work, brings us face-toface with current trends and sheds important light on the technological impacts on anthropology.», «The book is a worthwhile and interesting read and opens up many new avenues for reflection and study»

[REVIEW_SMASHER][REVIEW_ONE_PAGE] Amy Orben, DPhil Candidate, University of Oxford, [Psychologist](https://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:3792913a-ece6-4a3a-a4fc-60058910220f/download_file?file_format=pdf&safe_filename=20171023%2BOrben%2BBook%2BReview%2BiGen.pdf&type_of_work=Journal+article) — «There are science books written to promote science and there are science books written to promote the author. ‘iGen’ is clearly the latter.», «In her recent book, Jean Twenge neglects the opportunity to promote a balanced discourse about technology, and focusses instead on promoting herself.», «The book boasts an impressively long subtitle and graphs on almost every other page, however, this cannot shroud its lack of substance.», «Her analysis, however, mainly involves graphing trends on varying x-axes and examining how these lines change over time. Not delving into the data, the author scratches the surface of each variable, describing how its visual trends fit her overarching hypotheses.», «These hypotheses include that current teens are less happy due to smartphones and that they are growing up slower than previous generations. While studies are periodically mentioned, the reader never gains a deeper understanding of each effect and is quickly moved on to the next variable. This creates a disjointed and difficult reading experience.», «Combining superficial science and self-interest, ‘iGen’ sometimes reads more like an advertisement than a science book.»

Yaron J. Zoller, Nova Southeastern University, [The American Journal of Psychology](https://cpb-us-e1.wpmucdn.com/sites.ucsc.edu/dist/0/158/files/2017/10/iGen-Book-Review-for-the-American-Journal-of-Psychology-FINAL-yts7w1.pdf) — «While doing so, she adds materials to shape her story (and “humanizes” the young people behind the data), but at the same time loses some of the book’s academic credibility.», «Throughout the book, alternative possible variables that may be in-play are presented so that they can be rejected by Twenge and the case made for causation, but these attempts are so repetitive and non-scientific that they lose their charm after a while.», «According to Quinn (2017), Twenge commits “deceptive spin” by presenting her conclusions first and support for it later and by ignoring data that does not support her case. In addition, many of the y-axes of the book’s graphs (specifically, 91 of the 124 images), are misleading and do not start at zero, as indicated by Verbruggen (2017). This is known as ‘truncated graphs’ or ‘torn graphs’.», «Thus, when discussing generational trends in this review, one must remember that substantial changes described by the author may be modest and not robust.», «Ethics is also a concern in this book. One must wonder what was Twenge thinking when plugging in the book a reference to her consulting firm, iGen Consulting (Quinn, 2017).», «Most of the content in the book is descriptive and consequences and solutions are not fully developed. As a reader, I was left with the feeling that I have been tricked and given many problems, but not enough reasons or solutions.», «But I have little doubt a revised version of the book in a couple of years will answer most of my questions, as was done by Twenge in 2014 with the second edition of Generation Me. In iGen (2017), Twenge demonstrates she reads reviews on her writing and adapts accordingly.», «However, her recommendations are palpable and mostly repetitions of early sections in the book. Once again, one must wonder if she kept some recommendations from being reported to protect her consulting firm rather than lay it all out in the book.», «Twenge’s ideas are of common sense, including the need for American society to relax about safety.», «iGen is a good read and an interesting attempt to understand a new generation many of us know little about. As more data and research on iGen’ers become available, so will our ability to separate truths from fiction, truncated graphs from valid ones, and anecdotes and stories from scientific data.»

[REVIEW_NO_ACCESS] 張仁和, [臺灣人類學刊](http://ir.sinica.edu.tw/handle/201000000A/72806)

[REVIEW_NO_ACCESS] Fernando Pascual, [Ecclesia: Revista de cultura católica](https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=7559875)

[REVIEW_NO_ACCESS] Brunhild Krind, [Group](https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.13186/group.42.4.0363)

[FAIL_BIBLIOGRAPHY][BOOK_FILE_WITH_BIBLIOGRAPHY] «Twenge Jean Maria — iGen꞉ Why Today’s Super-Connected Kids Are Growing Up Less Rebellious, More Tolerant, Less Happy – and Completely Unprepared for Adulthood (Atria Books, 2017)»

[NOTE_FULL_NAME] «Твенге Джин Мария — Поколение I: Почему поколение Интернета утратило бунтарский дух, стало более толерантным, менее счастливым и абсолютно не готовым ко взрослой жизни, и что это значит для всех остальных»

[NOTE_FULL_NAME] «iGen: Why Today’s Super-Connected Kids Are Growing Up Less Rebellious, More Tolerant, Less Happy — and Completely Unprepared for Adulthood — and What That Means for the Rest of Us»

[NO_SCANNED_PDF]
-->
1. Твенге Джин Мария — Поколение I. Почему поколение Интернета утратило бунтарский дух, стало более толерантным, менее счастливым — и абсолютно не готовым ко взрослой жизни (РИПОЛ Классик, 2019).epub

<a id="Миллениалы"></a>
### Миллениалы

<a id="Российские-миллениалы"></a>
#### Российские миллениалы

<!--- [ACADEMIC_DEGREE] [ВШЭ](https://www.hse.ru/org/persons/63968) — «1986 — Кандидат экономических наук: специальность 08.00.01 «Экономическая теория»», «1998 — Доктор экономических наук: специальность 08.00.01 «Экономическая теория» и 22.00.03 «Экономическая социология и демография»»

[ACADEMIC_DEGREE_REVIEWERS] Ильин Владимир Иванович, [Федеральный образовательный портал ЭСМ](https://ecsocman.hse.ru/text/16134237/) — «кандидат наук: история [Ленинградский государственный университет, 1981]; доктор наук: социология [Институт социологии РАН, 2000]»

Омельченко Елена Леонидовна, [ВШЭ](https://www.hse.ru/org/persons/14509451) — «1983 — Кандидат философских наук: Московский государственный университет им. М.В. Ломоносова», «2005 — Доктор социологических наук: Институт социологии РАН, специальность 22.00.06 «Социология культуры», тема диссертации: Идентичности и культурные практики российской молодежи на грани ХХ—ХХI в.в.»

[REVIEW_CHECK] 2021-8-6

[POSITIVE_OR_NEUTRAL_REVIEW][REVIEW_RETELLING] Александр Субботин, аспирант кафедры демографии, Высшая школа современных социальных наук, МГУ, [Социологическое обозрение](https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/rossiyskoe-pokolenie-millenialov/pdf) — «Отделение от родителей, то есть переезд в собственное жилье (купленное или арендованное), также происходит позже. Здесь стоит сделать замечание, что при анализе результатов не были приняты во внимание некоторые из важных при-чин миграции за пределы места рождения, а также изменения места жительства в пределах одного населенного пункта. Первая — это поступление на учебу или работу в другой город, что коррелирует с данными Радаева о более позднем вы-ходе на рынок труда (с. 72). Вторая — переезд по причине вступления в брак, более характерный для женщин», «Она не лишена недостатков, особенно с точки зрения поколения их родителей или работодателей (препода-вателей). Однако при этом она обладает способствующими развитию общества достоинствами, одним из которых является опора не на авторитеты, а на самосто-ятельное суждение. Книга заставляет задуматься над причинами подобных трансформаций, над тем, чтобы изменить понятие взросления, смирившись с фактом меньшей политизированности миллениалов, а также с тем, что данное обстоятель-ство все же уместнее оценивать положительно.»

Елена Викторовна Водопьянова, доктор философских наук, главный научный сотрудник ИЕ РАН, [Научно-аналитический вестник ИЕ РАН](https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/millenialy-rossiyskaya-i-evropeyskaya-versii/pdf) — «Исследователь делает упор на неполитических формах активности миллениалов, а также на анализе их повседневности, что действительно очень важно и выгодно отличает данную книгу от многих теоретических и прикладных изысканий его коллег-социологов.», «На протяжении всего текста последовательно проводится мысль, что российские миллениалы скорее схожи, нежели отличны от их зарубежных ровесников. На наш взгляд, доказательства, приводимые в пользу данного тезиса, не всегда убедительны.», «Чаще всего российскую молодёжь В.В. Радаев сравнивает с американской, и в ходе такого сопоставления замечает, что едва ли не главным различием между ними оказывается отсутствие у соотечественников системной образовательной закредитованности, тогда как у американской молодёжи продолжают расти долги по образовательным кредитам. Сравнение вряд ли корректно: в нашей стране обучение студентов в основном финансируют родители.», «Аналогичные параллели автор проводит между отечественной и западной молодёжью, которая живёт в городах и на селе. Эти параметры сходства также довольно сложно принять, исходя, в частности, из колоссальных на сегодня прежде всего финансовых различий между российскими регионами, чего невозможно наблюдать в США.», «И если со сформулированными вызовами, исходящими от миллениалов, трудно не согласиться, то предлагаемые профессором В.В. Радаевым возможные ответы на них подчас выглядят либо спорно (апология «digital detox»по отношению к университетскому обучению в информационную эпоху), либо вполне традиционно», «С удивлением можно встретить на страницах научной монографии такие, например, глаголы как «заглубиться»1, трудно совмещаемые с общепринятым литературно-академическим стилем изложения материалов исследования.», « Это вовсе не означает, что исследователь написал неглубокую книгу. Напротив, в ней наличествуют как оценки, так и рекомендации. И хотя многое в них представляется спорным, монография безусловно дарит вдумчивому читателю обильный материал для полемичных размышлений о специфике и роли в современной России поколения миллениалов, а также об их социокультурных перспективах во всеобъемлющей информационной реальности.»

Ядова Майя Андреевна, кандидат социологических наук, Институт научной информации по общественным наукам РАН, [Полис. Политические исследования](https://www.elibrary.ru/download/elibrary_44252744_52899911.pdf) — «В своих размышлениях В.В. Радаев старается уйти от слишком полити-зированного отношения к понятию “поколение”. (…) Мы не совсем согласны с таким подходом: вряд ли возможно в принципе исключить обсуждение политических вопросов из поколенческого анализа», «Очевидно лишь, что отвечать на эти вызовы предстоит и новым поколениям россиян – наиболее удобным и понятным для них способом, т. е. в “своем стиле”. Одно это делает предпринятое В.В. Радаевым исследование не просто актуальным, а жизненно важным.»,  «На наш взгляд, книгу В.В. Радаева стоит рассматривать не только как блестящую, высокопрофессиональную по содержанию и исполнению первую система-тическую работу, посвященную отечественному поколению миллениалов, но и как программу для дальнейших научных изысканий на эту тему.»

[BOOK_OR_AUTHOR_OR_CONCEPT_CRITICISM] Анна Колотовкина, факультет социологии, Европейский университет в Санкт-Петербурге, [Laboratorium: журнал социальных исследований](https://soclabo.org/index.php/laboratorium/article/download/1128/2451) — «Если ученый симпатизирует предмету своего исследования, это может стать сильной стороной его работы, но с «Миллениалами…» все не столь однозначно. Это замечание – ни в коем случае не попытка дискредитировать академическую составляющую книги: исследование опирается на различные источники информации, в нем предпринят обширный сравнительный анализ.», «Поэтому целесообразной представляется критика не источников, а их интерпретации.», «Как и любая классификация поколений, приведенная выше вызывает разумные сомнения: насколько допустимо сравнение «старших» миллениалов, многие из которых на момент написания этой книги уже сами находились на преподавательских позициях (как указывает сам автор) и «младших», которые заканчивали школу и начинали учиться в университете? (…) Такого рода сомнения ведут не столько к отрицанию самой идеи деления на поколения, сколько к обозначению контекста: здесь неизбежны обобщения и упрощения, за которые нередко критикуют авторов работ на подобные темы.», «Несмотря на действительно спорные высказывания автора в этом разделе, подробный разбор этой части работы здесь, в рецензии, направленной на обсуждение академической составляющей книги, представляется нам неуместным», «Основываясь на данных ВЦИОМ, Радаев пишет, что большинство миллениалов голосовали за Владимира Путина на президентских выборах в 2018 году (с. 20). В результате автор делает вывод о низкой оппозиционной активности молодежи. Однако эти же данные показывают, что, хотя среди миллениалов наблюдалась самая высокая явка, процент поддержки Путина у молодого поколения ниже, чем у остальных возрастных групп (ВЦИОМ 2018)», «Акции протеста 2010-х были подавлены государственными структурами, однако, с точки зрения автора, «нестабильность» оппозиции связана с невысоким протестным потенциалом миллениалов», «Само измерение взрослости через брак и рождение детей представляется недостаточно обоснованным.», «Нежелание заводить детей, вопреки распространенному стереотипу (намек на который, по-видимому, содержится в книге), связано не с присущим миллениалам гедонизмом, а с экономическими трудностями.», «И хотя причинно-следственные связи, предложенные автором, можно подвергать сомнению, наиболее спорными представляются следующие тезисы. «Использование витаминов, минеральных веществ и БАДов» (с. 104), о котором говорит автор как о практике ЗОЖ, сейчас часто оспаривается сторонниками доказательной медицины и является сомнительным предиктором вовлеченности в ЗОЖ-практики.», «В заключение хотелось бы отметить, что предмет исследования Радаева настолько широкий – речь идет о целом поколении, сами границы которого могут оспариваться, – что любое высказывание о нем выглядит слишком общим.», «В каждой подтеме был упомянут гендерный аспект, однако и он требует дальнейшей работы: можно, например, предположить сильный гендерный эффект в том, что связано с ЗОЖ или досугом. Вопросы, на которые работа Радаева дает ответ, порождают новые вопросы. «Да, – устанавливает автор, – миллениалы все еще часто смотрят телевизор», но тут же возникает новый вопрос: почему они продолжают делать это в эпоху интернета?», «Почему этот разговор не получился? Возможно, дело в позиции, которую выбрал автор: рассказ преподавателя о своих студентах. Несмотря на насыщенность книги разнообразными количественными данными, автор недостаточно внимательно относится к контексту. Миллениалы зачастую говорят о семье, здоровье и политике в иных терминах и категориях, нежели предшествующие поколения, и, кажется, именно этой оптики и недостает книге.»

[Kr/Mono]

[BOOK_SERIES] Социальная теория

-->
1. Радаев Вадим Валерьевич — Миллениалы꞉ Как меняется российское общество (Издательский дом ВШЭ, 2019).djvu

<a id="Чтение"></a>
# Чтение

<a id="UseClark"></a>
## UseClark

<a id="NR-75"></a>
### NR

<a id="Непрофессионализм-15"></a>
#### Непрофессионализм

<!--- [NOTE] Судя по сайту UseClark, Тигелаар — колумнист, спикер — https://useclark.com/en/mark-tigchelaar/ . Написано, что его метод «научно обоснован», подтверждений чему найти не смог.

[NO_PDF] -->
1. Тигелаар Марк — Как читать, запоминать и никогда не забывать (Манн, Иванов и Фербер, 2017).epub

<a id="Герменевтическое-чтение"></a>
## Герменевтическое чтение

<!--- [NOTE] Книга не новейшая. Цитаты из самой книги: «Брошюра впервые была издана в 1924 году», «В основу настоящего издания положен текст, опубликованный в 1962 году Издательством Ленинградского государственного университета». Поварнин прожил до 1952.

[INFO] В имеющеся в Интернете издании 1994 года предприятия «Семигор»/малого индивидуального предприятия «Память» то же самое, но в концовке отсутствуют страницы с выходными данными 

[INFO] [Т. В. Фаненштиль, И. В. Садыкова и С. Ю. Суханова в статье «Метод Герменевтики В Единстве Дисциплин Ядра Бакалавриата НИ ТГУ»](http://vital.lib.tsu.ru/vital/access/services/Download/vtls:000795251/SOURCE1) называют подход Поварнина герменевтическим

-->
1. [Поварнин Сергей Иннокентьевич](http://www.hrono.ru/biograf/bio_p/povarninsein.php) — Как читать книги (Книга, 1971).pdf

<a id="Герменевтическое-прочтение-классических-текстов"></a>
### Герменевтическое прочтение классических текстов

<!--- [INFO] Книга, написанная в 1940 году + без ссылок на источники 

[Jerome J. McGann в книге «The textual condition»](https://sci-hub.se/10.1515/9780691217758-008) и [Т. В. Фаненштиль, И. В. Садыкова, С. Ю. Суханова в статье «Метод Герменевтики В Единстве Дисциплин Ядра Бакалавриата НИ ТГУ»](http://vital.lib.tsu.ru/vital/access/services/Download/vtls:000795251/SOURCE1) называют модель Адлера герменевтической

-->
1. Адлер Мортимер Джером — Как читать книги. Руководство по чтению великих произведений (Манн, Иванов и Фербер, 2014).pdf

<a id="Приёмы-рационального-чтения"></a>
## Приёмы рационального чтения

<!--- [INFO] Гецов, похоже, журналист, а не учёный. Одна из рецензентов — кандидат филологических наук.
[NOTE] Биография Гецова -->
1. Гецов Георгий Герасимович — Как читать книги, журналы, газеты (Знание, 1989).pdf

<a id="Скорочтение"></a>
## Скорочтение

<!--- [INFO] Один из рецензентов — психолог Алексей Алексеевич Леонтьев (другой рецензент Геннадий Григорьевич Воробьёв). Судя по информации сайта «Школа быстрого чтения», в состав научной группы Кузнецова (Олега Андреева) входили реальные известные учёные — https://fastread.ru/about/history/ . Профессиональной критики Андреева и его школы я не нашёл.

[NOTE] Биографии Кузнецова и Хромова. Нашёл, что Хромов — кандидат технических наук и автор книги о рекламе, где описывается НЛП — https://htbiblio.yolasite.com/resources/Хромов%20Лев.pdf#page=2 -->
1. Кузнецов Олег Андреевич, Хромов Лев Николаевич — Техника быстрого чтения (Книга, 1983).pdf

<a id="Эволюция"></a>
# Эволюция

<a id="Доказательства-эволюции"></a>
## Доказательства эволюции

<!--- [NO_ACADEMIC_DEGREE_EDITOR] Шурупова Яна Андреевна, «В 2015 году закончила с отличием магистратуру в МГГУ им. Шолохова, специальность биология. С 2016 года сотрудник кафедры биологической эволюции. В 2020 году закончила аспирантуру биологического факультета МГУ кафедры биологической эволюции.» — https://bioevolution-msu.ru/index.php/ru/o-kafedre/sotrudniki/uchebno-vspomogatelnyj-personal/259-shurupova-yana-andreevna . Учёного звания нет, повышение категории не засчитывается.

[CRIM_BESTSELLER]

[NO_SCANNED_PDF] -->
1. Койн Джерри Аллен — Эволюция. Неопровержимые доказательства (Альпина нон-фикшн, 2018).epub

<a id="Экономика"></a>
# Экономика

<a id="Введение-в-экономику"></a>
## Введение в экономику

<!--- [INFO] Научный редактор — Эльвира Владиславовна Кондукова — https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=buAvgv4AAAAJ

[POSITIVE_OR_NEUTRAL_REVIEW] А. В. Клыпин, кандидат экономических наук, [Управление наукой и наукометрия](https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/retsenziya-na-knigu-chang-ha-dzhun-kak-ustroena-ekonomika/pdf)

[DUPLICATE_GI]

 -->
1. Чхан Ха Джун — Как устроена экономика (Манн, Иванов и Фербер, 2015).pdf

<a id="Викиномика"></a>
## Викиномика

<a id="NR-76"></a>
### NR

<a id="Критика-3"></a>
#### Критика

<!--- [ACADEMIC_DEGREE] Согласно собственному сайту, Тапскотт — C.M., BA, BSc, M.Ed, LLD — https://dontapscott.com/about/ , LLD (Legum Doctor) — https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legum_Doctor ; Anthony D. Williams — https://web.archive.org/web/20071206025942/http://anthonydwilliams.com/about/ — “Anthony holds a Masters in Research in Political Science from the London School of Economics and is a PhD candidate in the Government Department.”

[AUTHOR_PROJECT] Blockchain Research Institute — https://www.blockchainresearchinstitute.org

[CRIM_SPEAKER] https://dontapscott.com/speaking/

[POSITIVE_OR_NEUTRAL_REVIEW][REVIEW_ESSAY] Claire Morgan, George Mason University — https://sci-hub.se/10.1111/j.1468-0270.2008.864_2.x — « Written in the breathless style typical of the advice-to-businessmen genre, the authors’ optimism can, at times, appear to overreach.»;

Roger Hurwitz, Massachusetts Institute of Technology — https://sci-hub.se/10.1080/19331680802294487 — «Wikinomics, like other evangelical texts,spreads the good news, sometimes partially,and ignores the bad news», «But it does suggest thatthe time has come for some skepticism regard-ing the extent, speed, and payoffs of the trans-formations that Wikinomics anticipates»

[BOOK_OR_AUTHOR_OR_CONCEPT_CRITICISM][REVIEW_LONG] Christian Fuchs, University of Saltzburg — https://www.ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/download/250/125 — «Tapscott and Williams have an idealistic and unrealistic view of capitalism», «The difference between my own approach and the authors’ is that the latter welcome this development, whereas I consider it from a neo-Marxist perspective as the extension and intensification of alienation and exploitation», «Due to its lack of grounding in scientific discourse and its extremely sloppy dealing with scientific sources and quotations, Wikinomics is not a scientific monograph, but more a guide for business leaders.»

Piotr Bołtuć, Doctor of Philosophy and Sociology, Ph.D. in Moral and Political Philosophy ( https://www.uis.edu/philosophy/homepage-middle/research/boltuc/ ) — « Nie jest jednak jasne, w jakim sensie prezentowany (a nawet lansowany) w tej książce system jest jeszcze systemem gospodarki opartej na konkurencji, a na ile jest to podejście, które przecenia rolę motywacji nieekonomicznych dla stabilnego tworzenia wartości w długiej skali czasowej», «Powstaje pytanie, czy nie popełniają przy tym błędu nieuzasadnonej generalizacji», «Nie doceniają faktu (na który zresztą się powołują), że czerpanie korzyści biznesowych z tego rodzaju wspólnych, a zazwyczaj też wspólnotowych, przedsięwzięć jest nierzadko niemożliwe, zwykle zaś utrudnione», «Niestety wydaje się, że autorzy, zauważywszy określony trend, przeceniają jego wagę, mylą tendencje do wzrostu znaczenia pewnego ważnego ruchu (jednak w znacznej mierze niszowego) z generalnym trendem gospodarczym», «Książka ma charakter na poły publicystyczny, co zwiększa jej atrakcyjność dla czytelnika, ale nie pomaga w naukowej i merytorycznej ocenie zawartych w niej tez»
http://www.e-mentor.edu.pl/artykul/index/numer/25/id/562

[ADDITIONAL_READING] Axel Bruns — «Blogs, Wikipedia, Second Life and beyond–From production to produsage»

Tiziana Terranova — «Network Culture Politics for the Information Age»

Eran Fisher, Christian Fuchs (by editing) — «Reconsidering Value and Labour in the Digital Age»

Christian Fuchs — «Critical theory of communication: new readings of Lukács, Adorno, Marcuse, Honneth and Habermas in the Age of the Internet.»

[NO_PDF][NO_SCEDRECO] -->
1. Тапскотт Дон, Уильямс Энтони — Викиномика. Как массовое сотрудничество изменяет всё (Альпина Паблишер, 2020).epub

<a id="Инклюзивная-экономика"></a>
## Инклюзивная экономика

<a id="Экономика-без-нищеты-безработицы-и-загрязнения-окружающей-среды"></a>
### Экономика без нищеты, безработицы и загрязнения окружающей среды

<!--- [ACADEMIC_DEGREE] «He received his Ph.D. in economics from Vanderbilt in 1969» — https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/peace/2006/yunus/biographical/

[AUTHOR_PROJECT] Grameen Bank — https://grameen.com

[POSITIVE_OR_NEUTRAL_REVIEW][REVIEW_RETELLING] อัครนัย ขวัญอยู่, อาจารย์ประจา คณะสังคมวิทยาและมานุษยวิทยา มหาวิทยาลัยธรรมศาสตร์ — https://sci-hub.se/https://so06.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/NER/article/download/240481/163861 ; [REVIEW_RETELLING] Dr. Carlos Rafael Coppa — https://repositorio.uca.edu.ar/bitstream/123456789/8667/1/un-mundo-tres-ceros.pdf

[BOOK_OR_AUTHOR_OR_CONCEPT_CRITICISM] Milford Bateman, Ha-Joon Chang — https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2385174 — «We argue that while the microfinance model may well generate some positive short run outcomes for a lucky few of the ‘entrepreneurial poor’, the longer run aggregate development outcome very much remains moot.», «Into the medium to longer run, however, the picture becomes far less clear. Many of the supposed positive impacts we find to be quite illusory or, at the very least, hugely exaggerated.», «rather than to neoclassical textbook abstractions and neoliberal myths, and through a process of adaptation and experimentation locate for themselves the sort of poverty reduction and local development policies that will work the best»

[ADDITIONAL_READING] Сингер Питер — «Жизнь, которую вы можете спасти. Как покончить с бедностью во всем мире»

Мухаммад Юнус, Алан Жюли — «Создавая мир без бедности: Социальный бизнес и будущее капитализма»

Kun Yan — «Poverty Alleviation in China»

Martin Ravallion — «The Economics of Poverty. History, Measurement, and Policy»

Michael B. Katz — «The undeserving poor: From the war on poverty to the war on welfare»

[NO_SCEDRECO]

[NOTE_FULL_NAME] Юнус Мухаммад, Вебер Карл — Мир трёх нулей. Как справиться с нищетой, безработицей и згрязнением окружающей среды (Альпина Паблишер, 2019)
-->
1. Юнус Мухаммад, Вебер Карл — Мир трёх нулей (Альпина Паблишер, 2019).pdf

<a id="Институциональная-экономика"></a>
## Институциональная экономика

<!--- [ACADEMIC_DEGREE] Доктор экономических наук, профессор — https://www.rvc.ru/about/governance/directors/auzan/

[CRIM_DIRECTION] Институциональная экономика — это одна из школ.

[CRIM_SPEAKER] http://www.topspeaker.ru/speakers/?ELEMENT_ID=11407 , https://spb.hse.ru/en/compecon/keynote_speakers/

[INFO] Книга с тем же содержанием от этого автора — “Институциональная экономика для чайников (Библиотека БКС) (Фэшн Пресс, 2011)”

[POSITIVE_OR_NEUTRAL_REVIEW] Б. В. Корнейчук, Санкт-Петербургский филиал НИУ ВШЭ — https://publications.hse.ru/mirror/pubs/share/folder/qlutsrd7zj/direct/141930204.pdf

[BOOK_OR_AUTHOR_OR_CONCEPT_CRITICISM][REVIEW_IDEAS] Владимир Максович Ефимов, «Анти-Аузан: Критика одной социальной философии» — https://vk.com/doc515956126_564043225 , https://vk.com/doc515956126_568443279

[CRIM_NO_REFS][NO_SCEDRECO] Аузан — учёный, но пишет как неспециалист, вообще без источников. Категория понижена. -->
1. [Аузан Александр Александрович](https://www.rvc.ru/about/governance/directors/auzan/) — Экономика всего. Как институты определяют нашу жизнь (Манн, Иванов и Фербер, 2014).pdf

<a id="Исходный-институционализм"></a>
### Исходный институционализм

<!--- [ACADEMIC_DEGREE] PhD (Женевский университет) — https://kursizdat.ru/authors/efimov_vladimir/

[POSITIVE_OR_NEUTRAL_REVIEW][REVIEW_HIGH_ERUDITION][REVIEW_LONG] Ханин Григорий Исаакович, доктор экономических наук — https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/nuzhna-li-sovremennaya-ekonomicheskaya-nauka-i-polezno-li-nyneshnee-ekonomicheskoe-obrazovanie-o-knige-v-m-efimova-ekonomicheskaya-nauka/pdf — «Здесь следует отметить, что книга Ефимова поражает колоссальной эрудицией автора, использованием огромного количества малоизвестных в России ли-тературных источников. И не просто использованием, но и глубоким их пониманием. Не боюсь признаться в своем невежестве, но о большинстве из них я даже не слышал. Как и о многих фактах, приводимых в книге. Характеристики экономических учений у Ефимова весьма подробны и содержательны. Иногда, правда, как мне показалось, это изложение становится самоцелью.», «Мне представляется, что в противопоставлении нютоновского и дискурсивного анализа с точки зрения обоснованности выводов экономической науки Ефимов захо-дит слишком далеко», «В.М. Ефимов написал замечательную и очень своевременную книгу. Она богата по содержанию и идеям, поистине энциклопедична. И, что не часто, проникну-то болью за состояние своей науки и подлинной гражданственностью.»

[REVIEW_HIGH_ERUDITION][REVIEW_LONG] Кондрашов Пётр Николаевич, кандидат философских наук — https://hjournal.ru/files/JIS_10_1/JIS_10.1_9.pdf — «Политическая философия, представленная в книге В. М. Ефимова, реалистична, но самое главное, на наш взгляд, она основывается на радикально гуманистическом понимании человека как существа, способного через обучение и воспитание становиться социально ответственной личностью, связанной солидарностью со всеми другими членами свободного сообщества.»

[BOOK_OR_AUTHOR_OR_CONCEPT_CRITICISM] Ореховский Пётр Александрович, доктор экономических наук, главный научный сотрудник Института экономики РАН — https://vk.com/doc515956126_494271120 — «С другой стороны, Ефимов высказывает ряд весьма категоричных и принципиальных суждений, с которыми я не могу согласиться», «Поэтому тезисы о том, что весь экономикс, теория игр и эконометрика не имеют отношения к реальности, — именно те априорные суждения, против которых Ефимов вроде бы и выступает», «Для всей книги Ефимова характерно еще одно априорное суждение, которое, к сожалению, приобрело для многих российских обществоведов характер банальности. Это мысль о том, что российскую и советскую жизнь предопределяли (и предопределяют) экономические теории вообще и экономисты в частности»

[NO_SCEDRECO] -->
1. Ефимов Владимир Максович — Экономическая наука под вопросом. Иные методология, история и исследовательские практики (Курс. Инфра-М, 2016).pdf

<a id="Интуитивные-теории-экономики"></a>
## Интуитивные теории экономики

<a id="Психология-непонимания-экономики"></a>
### Психология непонимания экономики

<!--- [ACADEMIC_DEGREE] Leiser, [Ben Gurion University of the Negev, CV](https://bgu.academia.edu/DavidLeiser/CurriculumVitae) — «PhD, 1978 Université de Genève, Switzerland, Psychology»

[NO_ACADEMIC_DEGREE] Shemesh, согласно книге — «holds a BA and MA in cognitive science from BenGurion University of the Negev, Israel. His research focuses on the ways the human evolutionary cognitive endowment affects how people think and act in the modern world.»

[NO_SCEDRECO]

[CRIM_FEEDBACK_IN_BOOK]

[REVIEW_CHECK] 2021-7-20

[POSITIVE_OR_NEUTRAL_REVIEW][REVIEW_RETELLING] Egor Bronnikov, National Research University Higher School of Economics, International Laboratory for Experimental and Behavioural Economics, [Journal of Behavioral Economics for Policy](https://sabeconomics.org/journal/RePEc/beh/JBEPv1/articles/JBEP-3-1-BR2.pdf) — «David Leiser and Yhonatan Shemeshprovide an elegant and striking analysis of the behaviouralorigins of public misperceptions of the logic and developmentof modern economics, and of their implications for publicpolicy.»

Carmela Aprea, Business School, University of Mannheim, Germany, [International Review of Economics Education](https://sci-hub.se/10.1016/j.iree.2020.100177) — «Given the domain-specificdifficulties and hurdles, the authors very clearly define the scope of possibilities for economic and/orfinancial education. Although one can certainly disagree as to where exactly the limits of these possibilities lie, this view is notonly modest but also realistic and less susceptible to fads and crazes in educational policy.», «The book by Leiser and Shemesh is ambitious also from a didactic point of view.», «In sum,How We Misunderstand Economics and Why it Mattersgives an excellent overview of current empiricalfindings in thisfield,mostly coming from economic psychology.», «I recommend reading this book to everyone concerned with the education of economically well-informed and responsible citizens»

Ivo Bischoff, Faculty of Economics and Management, Public Economics Unit, University of Kassel, Germany Nora-Platiel, [Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics](https://sci-hub.se/10.1016/j.socec.2018.10.008) — «This book provides a throrough and yet easilyaccessible review of literature. Only occasionally do the authors refer totheir own research. Instead, they cover research conducted by manyscholars – mostly psychologists. A special focus rests on empirical stu-dies that use data from surveys and experiments.», «Though the research sketched here is closely linked to theconcept of mental models (Johnston-Laird, 1980; De Kleer and Brown,1983), the authors do not point the reader to this link, nor do theyelaborate on it. This is somewhat unfortunate because the concept ofmental models builds on a way of thinking that economists may feelfamiliar with.», «In sum, the book by David Leiser and Yonatan Shemesh provides anexcellent introduction to the existing empirical research in this field. Itis an easily accessible and inspiring starting point especially for econ-omists who want to learn what psychology has to offer.»

Esther Greenglass, Department of Psychology, York University, Toronto, [Journal of Economic Psychology](https://sci-hub.se/10.1016/j.joep.2019.01.003) — «This is a scholarly work with over 500references, well-grounded in academic theory and empirical work. Further, it is a comprehensive volume in that the authors cover abroad range of varied topics including money, inflation, unemployment, capitalism, tradeoffs, rent control and taxation.», «These and other remarks derive from the authors’ application of psychological theory and empirical research to their observationsof individuals who are constantly navigating the economic landscape, a task that is much more complicated than they realize.», «We should be grateful to the authors for forcing us to face the issue:should our societies be run by “econocrats?”», «While the specific suggestions offered in the chapter are interesting, this is clearly a debate that must still take place», «What sets the Leiser and Shemesh book apart is its focuson misunderstanding and lay misconceptions about how the economy functions. Leiser and Shemesh’s work is the first to documentthis in depth, specifically for the understanding of economics. Moreover, they identify key features of economic thinking responsiblefor making economics more difficult to understand than other domains.», «This is why I consider Chapter 2 and 3 to be the most noveland important chapters, as they lay out the main argument, richly illustrated in later chapters. I also liked chapter 5, that shows how“the economy” is perceived very globally, and how this tendency affects beliefs and predictions that in turn affect the economy.», «The chapters on metaphors and ideology were also interesting for the way Leiser and Shemesh show how they are really substitutes for aproper understanding, in societies were people are expected to have an opinion but are not capable of forming one, though thesechapters were perhaps a little too detailed for the purpose.», «Given the broad implications of faulty reasoning in the economicsphere for individuals as well as for governance and for society, this book is a must read for laypeople, policy makers, governmentofficials, researchers as well as students.»

[REVIEW_RETELLING] Abigaela Bilbiie, University of Bucharest, [International Journal of Applied Behavioral Economics](https://www.igi-global.com/pdf.aspx?tid%3D270239%26ptid%3D254347%26ctid%3D17%26t%3Dhow+we+misunderstand+economics+and+why+it+matters%3A+the+psychology+of+bias%2C+distortion%2C+and+conspiracy%26isxn%3D) — «The book addresses a general audience, though I believe this work is a helpful tool especially for economics and behavioral economics students through its crisp exemplification of how people interact with economics and how their mental models and cognitive biases influence their economic and financial decisions.»

[NOTE_FULL_NAME] Leiser David, Shemesh Yhonatan S. — How We Misunderstand Economics and Why It Matters. The Psychology of Bias, Distortion and Conspiracy (Routledge, 2018)

[Is/Mono]
-->
1. Leiser David, Shemesh Yhonatan S. — How We Misunderstand Economics and Why It Matters (Routledge, 2018).pdf

<a id="Экономическая-иррациональность-избирателей"></a>
### Экономическая иррациональность избирателей

<!--- [CRIM_DIRECTION] Одна из теорий — https://www.elibrary.ru/download/elibrary_36480289_74802529.pdf

[ACADEMIC_DEGREE] Ph.D., Princeton University — https://fedsoc.org/contributors/bryan-caplan

[POSITIVE_OR_NEUTRAL_REVIEW] Yves Laberge, Directeur de la collection «L’espace public» — https://www.erudit.org/fr/revues/ps/2012-v31-n1-ps0364/1013142ar.pdf

[BOOK_OR_AUTHOR_OR_CONCEPT_CRITICISM] Donald Wittman, Department of Economics, University of California at Santa Cruz — https://sci-hub.se/10.1080/08913810802503517 , дебаты между Уиттманом и Капланом — https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/ekonomisty-ob-effektivnosti-demokratii-diskussiya-na-rubezhe-vekov/pdf ; Stuart Farrand, George Mason University — http://libertarianpapers.org/articles/2010/lp-2-28.pdf ; David Colander, Department of Economics, Middlebury College — https://sci-hub.se/10.1080/08913810802503426

[BOOK_SERIES] Политическая наука

[ADDITIONAL_READING] Ilya Somin, «Democracy and Political Ignorance»

Benjamin I. Page, Robert Y. Shapiro — «The Rational Public: Fifty Years of Trends in Americans' Policy Preferences»

-->
1. [Каплан Брайан](https://economics.gmu.edu/people/bcaplan) — Миф о рациональном избирателе. Почему демократии выбирают плохую политику (ИРИСЭН, Мысль, 2012).pdf

<a id="Макроэкономическая-история"></a>
## Макроэкономическая история

<a id="Макроэкономическая-история-Anno-Domini"></a>
### Макроэкономическая история Anno Domini

<a id="HC-14"></a>
#### HC

<!--- [ACADEMIC_DEGREE] Не нашёл информацию о его учёном звании. Но Мэдисон был профессором в многочисленных университетах — http://www.ggdc.net/maddison/CV.shtml

[NOTE] Не нашёл информации о редакторе Ольге Филаточевой

[AUTHOR_PROJECT] «The Maddison Project has been initiated in March 2010 by a group of close colleagues of Angus Maddison, with the aim to support an effective way of cooperation between scholars to continue Maddison's work on measuring economic performance for different regions, time periods and subtopics.» — https://www.rug.nl/ggdc/historicaldevelopment/maddison/?lang=en

[POSITIVE_OR_NEUTRAL_REVIEW][REVIEW_RETELLING] Vittorio Valli, University of Turin — http://ejce.liuc.it/18242979200802/182429792008050207.pdf

[REVIEW_RETELLING] Vittorio Daniele, Università ”Magna Graecia” di Catanzaro — https://sci-hub.se/10.1016/s1698-6989(09)70129-8

[REVIEW_ONE_PAGE] Geoffrey McNicoll, Australian National University — https://sci-hub.se/10.2307/25699071 — «Maddison is not reticent in reproving other economic historians. A particular charge against many Joel Mokyr, W. D. Nordhaus, and Bradford DeLong are instanced is exaggerating economic progress since 1800 and neglecting the earlier achievements of the merchant capitalist era. Depictions of centuries of Malthusian stagnation prior to 1800, with people living "like cavemen," are "fairytale scenarios" and "hallucigenic history." (Gregory Clark, a confirmed stagnationist, counters in even sharper terms in a review of this book in the December 2009 Journal of Economic History.)»

[BOOK_OR_AUTHOR_OR_CONCEPT_CRITICISM][REVIEW_SMASHER] Gregory Clark, University of California, Davis, [The Journal of Economic History](https://sci-hub.se/10.2307/25654039) — «There is, however, a problem at the core of the book, and indeed at the core at the whole Maddison project for at least the last ten years. All the numbers Maddison estimates for the years before 1820 are fictions, as real as the relics peddled around Europe in the Middle Ages.», «Among modern economists there is a hunger by the credulous for numbers, any numbers however dubious their provenance, to lend support to the model of the moment. Maddison supplies that market. How exactly Maddison created his numbers for many countries and epochs is never precisely clear.», «There is ample evidence, however, that incomes even of the most "primitive" societies greatly exceeded the Maddison assumption. Modern anthropologists, for example, have recorded the daily food consumption of surviving hunter-gatherer and shifting cultivation groups. The median consumption per person was 2,340 kcal per day, well above Maddison's assumed subsistence.», «The population estimates are largely drawn from Colin McElvedy and Richard Jones's Atlas of World Population History. Inspection of that source reveals that it is similarly largely a work of imagination in these earlier year. This book, for example, happily quotes estimates of the population of the Indian subcontinent for the years 1820 and earlier. Yet examination of the sources reveals there are essentially no data on population for India, at present, for the years 1820 and before. All this material is suitable for use only in the most general and qualified way.», «Despite this these numbers on GDP per capita, by country, have been widely used to lend support to theoretical models. The authors using them are happily employing as "data" what is not data at all, but the expression of one man's unexamined theory of what must have happened in the last two millennia of human history.», «Thus they are not a noteworthy attraction of the book. Maddison's latest set of numbers, laid out in the tables of this book, are his claim to fame. For the reasons given above, however, any economist with enough street savvy to resist fabulous riches offered by unknown Nigerians over the internet will equally want to steer clear of these estimates.»

[REVIEW_SMASHER] Timothy Guinnane, Yale University — https://sci-hub.se/10.2307/27647156 — «For some countries, Maddison has constructed more speculative estimates that date to the start of the Common Era. His efforts now underlie much if not most research in the empirics of long-run economic growth», «One noteworthy point in this chapter comes up again below: Maddison never seriously considers the conceptual basis of the methods his heroes employed. There is a now a more-or-less close congruence between economic theory and the way we measure economic aggregates. Nowhere does Maddison broach the topic of what someone like Petty thought he was measuring.», «For example, for the German case, most of Maddison's figures rely on W. G. Hoffmann's pioneering work in German national income accounting. Hoffmann's work had important gaps and weaknesses, some of which were acknowledged by Hoffmann himself.», «How many of Maddison's underlying sources suffer similar problems? We cannot really know. With the exception of Britain and the United States, economic historians have not devoted the requisite effort to historical national income accounting.», «The "explana tion" always has a similar flavor: one authority's estimate is "too high" or "too low." Maddison rarely provides a reasoned argument or more detailed explanation of why he thinks something is too high or low.», «A final worrying trait on display here is a ten dency to react to critics with either scorn or a point-by-point rebuttal that suggests little effort to profit from disagreement. Three appendices to chapter six amount to swipes at earlier critics (one is called "Hallucigenic History"). His rejec tion of any lessons from one particular alterna tive approach is particularly troubling. His rejec tion of any lessons from one particular alterna tive approach is particularly troubling. Robert Allen and other economic historians have assem bled a large database of wages and prices that permits reasonable estimates of real wages in many European cities for much of the period for which Maddison reports GDP estimates.»

[NO_SCEDRECO] -->
1. [Мэддисон Энгас](http://www.eco.rug.nl/GGDC/maddison/CV.html) — Контуры мировой экономики в 1—2030 гг. Очерки по макроэкономической теории (Институт Гайдара, 2012).djvu

<a id="Международные-экономические-организации"></a>
## Международные экономические организации

<a id="Разрушительная-политика-международных-экономических-организаций"></a>
### Разрушительная политика международных экономических организаций

<!--- [ACADEMIC_DEGREE] Ph.D. in Economics, M.I.T. — https://www.sipa.columbia.edu/sites/default/files/documents/Stiglitz%20CV%20May%202019_0.pdf

[REVIEW_BIG][POSITIVE_OR_NEUTRAL_REVIEW] Jonathan Perraton; Department of Economics and Political Economy Research Centre, University of Sheffield https://sci-hub.se/10.1002/jid.1134 — «As other reviewers have pointed out,Stiglitz is frustratingly vague on his proposals for reform of the international financialarchitecture and institutions (cf. Basu, 2003).», «The key limitation here is that although Stiglitz is both a highly skilled technical economist andan acute commentator on contemporary economic affairs he is apt to jump between thetwo without filling in the gaps.»

[REVIEW_RETELLING] Luiz Carlos Delorme Prado, Professor do Instituto de Economia da UFRJ — https://www.ufjf.br/pur/files/2011/04/REC_6.2_08_A_globalizacao_e_seus_maleficios_a_promessa_nao_cumprida_de_beneficios_globais.pdf

[REVIEW_RETELLING] Fabián Ricardo Acuña Calderón, Universidad Nacional de Colombia — http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0121-50512003000100017 — «Sin embargo, resulta curioso que Stiglitz reclame de los países en desarrollo una posición más proactiva, cuando él mismo sabe que uno de los principios elementales del capitalismo es someter al otro, es decir imponer condiciones. Él deja en manos de estos países la decisión de aceptar la ayuda internacional», «No obstante, el trabajo de Stiglitz es sumamente productivo al señalar los responsables del desequilibrio económico, social y político. La opinión crítica emanada de alguien como él, que conoce el mundo financiero internacional, es determinante al momento de evaluar el proceso de globalización.»

Michael Ming Du, Associate, Fried, Frank, Harris,Shriver & Jacobson LLP — https://sci-hub.se/10.1093/chinesejil/jmn012 — «This is a well-received ‘‘unorthodox’’ mono-graph», «The author’s book effectively puts forward avariety of institutional and legal questions to theinternational community.»

[BOOK_OR_AUTHOR_OR_CONCEPT_CRITICISM][REVIEW_LONG][REVIEW_SAYS_LITTLE] Timothy Koechlin, Department of Economics, Vassar College, Poughkeepsie, NewYork, USA — https://sci-hub.se/10.1080/09538250600571551 — «This paperargues that whileGlobalization and its Discontentsis deeply flawed, it is ultimately animportant book.», «GID is a flawed book, for sure. Parts of it are poorly argued and much of Stiglitz’s argument is unoriginal», «All of this said, Globalization and its Discontentsis a limited and flawed book. There is, for starters, very little inGIDthat has not been argued more clearlyand persuasively somewhere else. Other than Stiglitz’s many anecdotes, whichare often enlightening and occasionally powerful, this book does not have muchnew to say.», «There is no mention ofsweatshops or outsourcing, andGIDhas very little to offer regarding the specificmechanisms by which globalization seems to promote inequality. And whileGIDdoes help to legitimize the concerns and efforts of ‘globalization’s discontents’,Stiglitz appears to have a limited sense of the agenda of the complex, multidimen-sional anti-globalization movement», «Stiglitz is not inclined (or, perhaps, equipped) to disentangle theclass issues that are at the core of global capitalism.»;

[REVIEW_EXPERT][REVIEW_SMASHER] Kevin C. Kennedy; Professor of Law, Michigan State University-Detroit College of Law — «Stiglitz makes no pretense of being balanced or of writing a scholarly work. On the contrary, Globalization and Its Discontents isn’t scholarship at all, but rather rambling, uneven rhetoric.», «On occasion Stiglitz is given over to mean-spiritedness and ad hominem attacks», «His ignorance of dispute settlement processes is shocking», «He thus sets up false arguments when attacking the WTO and the global trading system. It doesn’t take a Nobel laureate to knock down a straw man», «If Stiglitz is in fact an advocate for globalization, he does an incredibly poor job of defending and explaining it» — https://sci-hub.se/https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=460481

[REVIEW_LONG] Benjamin M. Friedman, The New York Review of Books — https://scholar.harvard.edu/files/bfriedman/files/globalization_stiglitzs_case.pdf — «He observes that IMF officials tend to meet onlywith finance ministers and central bank governors, as wellas with bankers and investment bankers; they never meetwith poor peasants or unemployed workers. He also notesthat many IMF officials come to the Fund from jobs in theprivate financial sector, while others, after working atthe IMF, go on to take jobs at banks or other financial firms», «To begin, it is easy enough to accuse Stiglitz of selectivememory. From reading Globalization and Its Discontents, onewould never know that the IMF had ever done anything useful», «One can also disagree with Stiglitz over the consequencesof what the IMF plainly did, even including those policiesit pursued that most people now agree provedcounterproductive», «A more fundamental problem, as Stiglitz readilyacknowledges, is that we cannot reliably know whether theconsequences of the IMF's policies were worse than whateverthe alternative would have been.», «Nor does he pay much attention tothe large-scale corruption that is endemic in manydeveloping economies—except in the case of corruption in Russia», «It is surprising too, in light of his emphasis on theabsence of adequate regulation and supervision of financial institutions in the developing world, that Stiglitz doesnot make more of the mistakes made by private-sector businesses.», «It is now important that someone else — if possible, someone who thinks and writes as clearly as Stiglitz does, and who understands the underlying economic theory as well as he does, and who has a first hand command of the facts of recent experience comparable tohis—take up this challenge by writing the best possiblebook laying out the other sides of the argument»;

[REVIEW_SMASHER] Grzegorz Gorzelak, Uniwersytet Warszawski — http://studreg.uw.edu.pl/pdf/2003_4_gorzelak_rec.pdf — «Argumentacja jest cze ̨sto dos ́c ́ sper-sonalizowana (np. Stiglitz wdaje sie ̨w analizy dro ́g zawodowych szefo ́w IMF,wskazuja ̨c na ich powia ̨zania ze sferami finansowymi, lub tez ̇przytaczarelacje ze swoich spotkan ́ itp.). Przykłady sa ̨tez ̇dobrane dos ́c ́ jednostronnie,co dla polskiego czytelnika staje sie ̨jasne podczas lektury rozdziało ́w po-s ́wie ̨conych procesom transformacji krajo ́w postsocjalistycznych.», «Interpretacje dawane przez J. Stiglitza powoduja ̨powstanie pewnego niedo-sytu», «Interpretacje dawane przez J. Stiglitza powoduja ̨powstanie pewnego niedo-sytu», «Czytelnik odnosi wraz ̇enie, z ̇e ta cze ̨s ́c ́ pracy zawiera wiele przykłado ́wdobranych „pod teze ̨”iz ̇e autor nie da ̨z ̇ydopełnej, pogłe ̨bionej obiektywnos ́cianalizy proceso ́w transformacji.», «Taki bardzo jednostronnystyl argumentacji, zupełne pominie ̨cie Leszka Balcerowicza (kto ́remu nawetnajwie ̨ksi rodzimi krytycy polskiej transformacji nie odmawiaja ̨zasług w pierw-szym jej okresie) oraz abstrahowanie od sfery realnej nie pozwala, by wywodyStiglitza mogły byc ́ uznane za godne najwyz ̇szej oceny. A jez ̇eli jest takw odniesieniu do tej cze ̨s ́ci s ́wiata, kto ́ra ̨dobrze znamy z autopsji – to czymoz ̇na bezkrytycznie wierzyc ́ autorowi, gdy pisze on o krajach od nas odleg-łych i znanych tylko z wto ́rnych opiso ́w?», «Ich formułowanie jest jednakkonieczne po to przynajmniej, by prowokowac ́ krytyczna ̨refleksje ̨nad obec-nym i przyszłym porza ̨dkiem s ́wiatowym. Ksia ̨z ̇ka Josepha Stiglitza – mimozastrzez ̇en ́, jakie do niej moz ̇na miec ́ – zadanie to spełnia wys ́mienicie.»

[REVIEW_SMASHER] Katalin Szilagyi, PhD in Economics ( https://www.ogresearch.com/teammember/katalin-szilagyi ) — http://buksz.c3.hu/0402/03szilagyi.pdf — «Ha nem látjuk a megvalósítható-ság korlátait, akkor értetlenül szemléljük a valós gaz-daságpolitikai döntéseket, és könnyen légbôl kapottösszeesküvés-elméletekkel próbáljuk magyarázni azta megdöbbentô jelenséget, hogy kormányok szándé-kosan a nem jót választják.», «Ha a tudományos diskurzus szabályai szerintjátszunk, akkor módszeresen cáfolhatjuk, relativizál-hatjuk, empirikus elemzésekkel ütköztethetjük a fen-ti tankönyvi érveket. Ha azonban csak annyit te-szünk, hogy tudatosan hallgatunk róluk, akkor elcsal-tunk egy dilemmát.», «Mi több, az is méltatlan a gazdaság elméletét ésgyakorlatát egyaránt jól ismerô tudóshoz, hogy a lai-kusok amúgy gyakran tetten érhetô naiv hitét erôsíti,mely szerint árnyalt és okos korlátozással elérhetôvolna, hogy csak a jó, a termelést fokozó, munkahe-lyet teremtô, növekedést serkentô, nemes szándékútôke jöjjön be az adott országba, a nyerészkedô, spe-kuláló, kizsákmányoló pedig ne.», « Ez utóbbi kérdés már nem-csak a korlátok nélküli választás álságos és hamis ké-pével sérti meg a közgazdász céh minimumszabálya-it, hanem átvezet egy hasonlóan súlyos vétséghez, amorális ítélet szerepének félreértelmezéséhez, azelemzés morális ítéletekkel való helyettesítéséhez.», «Bármilyen befogadói szintre egyszerûsítjük is a tu-dományt, nem helyettesíthetjük az elemzést a jók ésrosszak deklarálásával, ahogy Stiglitz teszi, minden teketória és kritika nélkül átvéve a régebbi keletûfejlôdés-gazdaságtan szent teheneit és a frissebb glo-balizációellenes ponyvairodalom mumusait. Stiglitznél azonban a szegények jók, a gazdagokmeg rosszak, és pont.», «Bár-mennyire utáljuk is az elnyomorító IMF-programo-kat, valódi alternatívára ritkán bukkanunk, Stiglitznormatív ajánlásai meglehetôsen laposak.», «Hagyjuk az olvasóra, hogy eldönt-se, vajon a fokozatos (különutas) átmenet jobb-e,vagy a (mintákat importáló) sokkterápia. Az óvatlanolvasó pedig nagy eséllyel belesétál a kétes okság jólelôkészített csapdájába.»

[NO_OCR][NO_SCEDRECO] -->
1. [Стиглиц Джозеф](https://www.sipa.columbia.edu/faculty-research/faculty-directory/joseph-e-stiglitz) — Глобализация. Тревожные тенденции (Национальный общественно-научный фонд, Мысль, 2003).pdf

<a id="Поведенческая-экономика"></a>
## Поведенческая экономика

<a id="История-поведенческой-экономики"></a>
### История поведенческой экономики

<!--- [ACADEMIC_DEGREE] Ph.D. University of Rochester, 1974; Dissertation Title: "The Value of Saving A Life: A Market Estimate" https://www.chicagobooth.edu/-/media/78F14D367F974D6AAC54C76BE5D3CF37

[POSITIVE_OR_NEUTRAL_REVIEW] Biljana Panić, University of Belgrade, Faculty of Organizational Sciences, Serbia — «The book can be very useful for people who do not know anything about behavioural economics because it is well structured, easy to read and understand, and very entertaining.», «The book does not provide a new economic theory or new economic models either.» — http://management.fon.bg.ac.rs/index.php/mng/article/view/279/156 ; Ronny Thomas, Assistant Professor Rajagiri Centre for Business Studies — https://sci-hub.se/http://journals.rajagiri.edu/index.php/rmj/article/download/23/16

[BOOK_OR_AUTHOR_OR_CONCEPT_CRITICISM] Alex C. Cartwright — https://sci-hub.se/https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11127-015-0276-5 ; Jean-Michel Servet — https://journals.openedition.org/regulation/12278

[NOTE] «Издательство Э» добавило в название книги нобелевского лауреата «как на этом заработать», будто это книга какого-то успехмэна

[CRIM] Коммерческий интерес; Талер — основатель Fuller & Thaler Asset Management Inc. — https://www.fullerthaler.com/about

[NO_SCEDRECO][NO_PDF] -->
1. [Талер Ричард](https://www.chicagobooth.edu/faculty/directory/t/richard-h-thaler) — Новая поведенческая экономика. Почему люди нарушают правила традиционной экономики и как на этом заработать (Издательство «Э», 2017).fb2

<a id="Модель-обязательств"></a>
### Модель обязательств

<!--- [ACADEMIC_DEGREE] [SC Johnson College of Business, CV](https://apps.business.cornell.edu/faculty-research/faculty/vita/rhf3) — «Ph.D. Economics, University of California at Berkeley, 1972»

[Is/Mass]

[POSITIVE_OR_NEUTRAL_REVIEW] Kai A. Konrad, Universitat Munchen, [The Economic Journal](https://sci-hub.se/10.2307/2233985) — «Robert Frank’s Passions within Reason has an impressive explanatory impact on the seemingly irrational altruistic behaviour and gives an intellectually rational explanation for the existence, the survival and the emergence of emotions like hate, love or preference for fairness in a competitive world with scarce resources.», «Summarising, few readers of Passions Within Reason are likely to resist the stringent reasoning and the abundance and forcefulness of examples from empirical research.»

Eric W. Noreen, University of Washington, [Accounting Historians Journal](https://egrove.olemiss.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1366&context=aah_journal) — «In this book, Robert H. Frank, who is a professor of econom-ics at Cornell University, persuasively argues that passions (or emotions) play a strategically important role in human affairs.», «Passions Within Reason should be required reading for all social scientists — particularly those of us who have been influenced by the rational economic man paradigm.»

Michael Waldman, University of California, Los Angeles, [Journal of Political Economy](https://sci-hub.se/10.2307/2937675) — «I found these applications to be in general well reasoned, well presented, and quite persuasive.», «In relationship to the rest of the book, I found the discussion of this issue somewhat disappointing. Frank treats the idea that culture is important as a rather obvious point and provides little systematic discussion. Although the basic point may be quite obvious, there is a related question quite important for Frank's argument that does not have such an obvious answer: How do cultures themselves evolve? (…) I felt that Frank's book would have benefited from a chapter that links his approach to the burgeoning literature in this area.», «Overall, Frank has written an important book that is well worth reading. It challenges the traditional paradigm in a logically consistent and quite persuasive fashion. I would recommend it to all who are truly interested in the real factors that underlie human behavior.»

Tibor Scitovsky, Stanford University, [Journal of Economic Literature](https://sci-hub.se/10.2307/2727194) — «His analysis of rational self interest as a determinant of honest behavior is equally interesting but somewhat incomplete, although in this reviewer's opinion he leads up to a complete answer but then shies away from providing it.», «That is the one point where I part company with the author. I find his argument about the Darwinian evolution of uprightness unconvincing and do not believe that honesty is an either-or proposition, uninfluenced by experience.», «The great merit of the book is that it makes generally accessible in plain, readable English its important and interesting ideas, some of which are not new but have so far been reserved for the cognoscenti, conversant with the language of game theory. It will be enjoyed by the general reader and ought to be a must for economics undergraduates.»

Jan Smith, Ohio Wesleyan University, [Michigan Sociological Review](https://sci-hub.se/10.2307/40968974) — «Some economists doubtless have greeted his book by allowing that it could improve their theoretical machinery if only the modifications were not so expensive. They miss the point. If we elaborate Frank's fundamental thesis, that the emotions are both the spurs to human action and omnipresent social signals, we shall find that it cannot be attached even to the consistent-and-stable-preference skeleton of economic theory.», «Frank's misfortune is that his main strategy may diminish his audience. Accustomed to a sharp distinction between natural greed and nurtured moral constraint, the Durkheimians tend to dismiss sociobiology as a myope that cannot see nurtured human variability»

[REVIEW_ONE_PAGE] Dennis S. Gouran, a professor and Head in the Department of Speech Communication at Penn State University, [Quarterly Journal of Speech](https://sci-hub.se/10.1080/00335639109383966) — «Frank's purpose is not to destroy the "rational actor" model's conception of whatconstitutes rational choice. Rather, it is to suggest that the model does not ade-quately account for the range of choices made by decision makers and problemsolvers.», «In general, however, the model accounts for choice in relation to values, beliefs, andattitudes to which individuals have strong emotional attachments. The values of thisdiscussion for purposes of this essay lies in its offering of yet another possible reasonfor the inconsistency that frustrates efforts to resolve the theoretical status of rationalapproaches to decision making and problem solving discussion.»

Alan Hamlin, University of Southampton, [Ethics](https://sci-hub.se/10.1086/293300) — «In many places in the book-and particularly in the formal model of the commitment problem-that is appended-it is clear that emotion trumps reason and forces a particular action. For example, the person subject to guilt is literally committed to honesty in all circumstances, so that the world is divided into the honest and the opportunistically dishonest. (…) But in other parts of the book-and particularly the discussion of experimental evidence-it seems that emotions do not act as constraints but are simply additional arguments that enter into the individual's rational calc.», «The second area of concern relates more directly to the evolutionary thesis itself. Frank certainly succeeds in telling a plausible story relating individual material advantage-and therefore evolutionary fitness-to certain emotional predispositions to be activated in certain settings. But it is not difficult to think of other human emotions, or other settings, in which the argument fails. It is not clear that the range of human emotions, taken as a set, operate in the way that Frank argues in relation to particular emotions.», «The deeper problem here is that plausible evolutionary stories abound, and we lack criteria by which to judge their explanatory value. It would be too much to expect Frank to overcome this fundamental problem while also providing an account of a particular plausible story, but the fundamental problem must provide the backdrop against which we read particular stories. Frank develops his themes, and presents a wide variety of evidence, with great skill and style.»

[REVIEW_RETELLING] Старосоцкая Полина, студентка бакалавриата, школа философии, Национальный исследовательский университет «Высшая школа экономики», [Философия. Журнал Высшей школы экономики](https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/emotsii-kak-dvizhuschiy-motiv-chelovecheskogo-povedeniya-retsenziya-na-knigu-r-frenka-o-klyuchevoy-roli-emotsiy-v-prinyatii-resheniy/pdf) — «В последние годы широкое распространение получила идея о том, что природа человека эгоистична и что в принятии решений он склонен руководствоваться эгоистическими мотивами для того, чтобы выжить в процессе естествен-ного отбора. Такой теории эгоизма склонны придерживаться специа-листы в области биологии, психологии, экономики. Однако существуетдругой взгляд на этот вопрос.» (*прим. авт. — в последние на момент написания рецензии годы как раз наоборот считается, что не руководствуется только эгоистическими мотивами*), «Книга Роберта Фрэнка была встречена положительными отзывамиколлег-экономистов, в которых были по достоинству оценены увлека-тельность повествования, ясность слога и глубина и точность изло-женного материала.» (*прим. авт. — что-то не заметил такого в других рассмотренных здесь рецензиях; похоже на штамп*) «Он представляет ценность, прежде всего, в вопросах морали, личных взаимоотношений и здоровой социальной коммуникации, построенной на любви, привязанности и взаимном доверии»

[BOOK_OR_AUTHOR_OR_CONCEPT_CRITICISM] Jana Noel, Graduate School of Education, University of California, Los Angeles, [Studies in Philosophy and Education](https://sci-hub.se/10.1007/BF00372683) — «And while it would seem that this would provide a thorough examination of the hypothesis offered, Frank in actuality is very limited in his conception of several of the main aspects of his theory. In fact, his discussion of emotions and rationality is so one-sided that this review could be titled "Passions Within Reason Whose Passions and Whose Reason?"», «Frank, if not using the wrong description, is at the minimum very limited in his conception of several of the main aspects of his theory.», «Unfortunately for Frank, but fortunately for those interested in the subject, there are other discussions of rationality, which include many aspects not even considered by Frank. Frank here has virtually ignored the large philosophical literature on rationality, but for his discussion of the "present aim theory" vs. the self-interest theory of rationality, taken almost entirely from Derek Parfit.», «None of this or any other of the literature on rationality requires the narrow and limited definition that Frank has given rational behavior.», «Frank also limits his theory in that there is virtually no discussion of the concept of emotions. (…) Frank has not considered what many theorists consider to be necessary features of emotions. By many definitions, emotions are directed toward an object, and may be determined by the beliefs the person has about that object and the judgment that is formed about the object and situation. (…) This is, of course, only one view. The point is that the long-standing debate on "passions within reason" vs. "the rationality of emotions" cannot be ignored by any author writing about the topic, especially one who titles his book Passions Within Reason.», «But he leaves himself open to criticisms of his view because of his lack of inclusion of the various alternative aspects of these concepts. For instance, the idea that emotions could be rational is in direct contrast to Frank's hypothesis of emotions being contrary to self-interest and thus irrational.», «Further, he ends up treating the concept of rationality unfairly by interchanging 'rational behavior' and 'selfinterested behavior', without considering the effects his criticisms will have on rationality. The reader may wish for a discussion of the different accounts, both to fortify Frank's account in certain areas and to contrast with Frank's overall account.», «Frank has done a fine job of showing how a disposition to cooperate, especially, is an advantage in social situations, even though it may seem to be contrary to a person's self-interest.», «There are two questions that are not answered satisfactorily in the book, the questions of causality and of predictability.», «Frank has not convinced me that emotions actually have a causal relationship with dispositions.», «But this field, while discovering much about body language and expressions, and about a person's behaviors in specific situations, has not been able to advance its findings as absolute, predictor variables. There was still a question in my mind as to whether the prediction aspect of his hypothesis is justified.», «And finally, Frank would have helped his case by bringing in the theorists' whose ideas would be supportive of his.», «In sum, Frank's idea has merit. But he must do more to examine the various alternative as well as supportive views before he will convince every reader of the worth of his claim.»

Steven L. Gordon, California State University, Los Angeles, [Contemporary Sociology](https://sci-hub.se/10.2307/2072516) — «For example, he cites findings that marriages are more satisfying when based on selfless love rather than an exchange orientation, and that altruists tend to have higher socioeconomic status (although the direction of causality is unclear in both cases).», «However, this breadth comes at the expense of poor empirical support for the argument. Even in such well-researched fields as altruism or romantic attraction, Frank cites few studies and even some of those seem flimsy», «A serious limitation of Frank's analysis is the confusion of "emotions" (situational reactions) and "moral sentiments" (enduring feelings about a person) and "emotional predispositions" (personality traits). For example, Frank cites research by Charles Darwin and Paul Ekman on the evolution of facial expressions as evidence that emotions are expressed spontaneously and recognizably. But this research pertains only to a small set of emotions, such as anger, fear, and surprise, not to the moral sentiments central to Frank's theory, such as sympathy, envy, or guilt, for which no typical expressive paradigm may exist», «However, Frank's analysis leaves unresolved the issue of how accurately people can recognize emotional cues to form impressions of a partner's character. Genuine and deceitful facial muscle patterns are difficult for the untrained persons to distinguish, according to Paul Ekman and other researchers. Frank argues that people need only be "reasonably accurate" in judging others. Empirical questions remain, however, about our typical degree of accuracy in recognizing emotions, and about whether emotional cues really provide the requisite information to identify cooperators.», «For certain fields, at least, Frank's argument is not new. For example, theories of intimate relationships have long recognized that exchange processes differ across relationship stages and must be distinguished from communal relationships in which partners are intrinsically valued. Nor are Frank's claims particularly bold.», «Nonetheless, this book is thought-provoking for the imagination with which it integrates economic theory, sociobiology, and the psychology and sociology of emotions.»

[ADDITIONAL_READING] Fred Hirsch — «Social Limits to Growth»

Derek Parfit — «Reasons and Persons»

Brian Hedden — «Reasons Without Persons: Rationality, Identity, and Time»

Robert Boyd, Peter J. Richerson — «Culture and the Evolutionary Process»

David Gauthier — «Morals by Agreement»

Diana Gordon, Steven L. Gordon — «Human Physiology with Vernier Student Edition Logger Pro»

Robert H. Frank, Philip J. Cook — «The Winner-Take-All Society»

Robert H. Frank — «Choosing the Right Pond: Human Behavior and the Quest for Status»

Роберт Франк — «Микроэкономика и поведение»

Роберт Франк — «Дарвиновская экономика»

Robert H. Frank — «The Economic Naturalist’s Field Guide»

Robert H. Frank — «The Economic Naturalist»

[NO_PDF][NO_SOURCES] -->
1. Фрэнк Роберт Х. — Страсти в нашем разуме. Стратегическая роль эмоций (ВШЭ, 2017).fb2

<a id="Повседневная-экономика"></a>
## Повседневная экономика

<a id="Объяснение-повседневных-вещей-мейнстримной-экономикой"></a>
### Объяснение повседневных вещей мейнстримной экономикой

<a id="NR-77"></a>
#### NR

<a id="Академический-вокизм-1"></a>
##### Академический вокизм

<!--- [NOTE] В главе 24 многократно подчёркивается «научность» аргументов Ландсбурга и дискредитируются защитники окружающей среды. На самом же деле это набор аргументов из Anti-SJW глоссария — https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Social_justice_warrior#Anti-SJW_glossary . Примеры цитат: «Мой собственный опыт подсказывает, что вы столкнетесь с подобием блаженной улыбки евангелиста, проповедующего по квартирам, сраженного непредвиденным вопросом, но уверенного в том, что он постиг Божественное Откровение»; «мы рассматриваем движение в защиту окружающей среды как форму массовой истерии сродни исламскому фундаментализму или движению "Борьба с наркотиками"». Обсуждение вопроса в Independent Institute — https://www.independent.org/news/article.asp?id=2158 .

[NOTE] [Позиционирование себя Ландсбургом](https://volokh.com/archives/archive_2007_04_22-2007_04_28.shtml#1177382131) — «As a hardcore libertarian, I am sympathetic to the sentiment.»

Из книги: «Изложенные в этой книге идеи призваны дать беспристрастную картину того, как мыслят экономисты, принадлежащие к магистральному направлению экономической науки»

[BOOK_OR_AUTHOR_OR_CONCEPT_CRITICISM] Joseph Romm, Ph.D., Physicis — https://slate.com/technology/2007/10/what-steven-landsburg-doesn-t-understand-about-climate-change.html — «In fact, Gore understands what Landsburg doesn’t: The realities of catastrophic global warming can render economic analysis largely moot.», «No wonder it is said that economists understand the price of everything but the value of nothing.», «Landsburg seems to believe that only economists can discuss climate change seriously, while the rest of us are wasting everyone’s time: “If you’re not talking about discount rates and levels of risk aversion, you’re blathering.”» -->
1. [Ландсбург Стивен](https://www.fraserinstitute.org/profile/steven-e-landsburg) — Экономист на диване. Экономическая наука и повседневная жизнь (Институт Гайдара, 2012).djvu

<a id="Практические-вопросы-различных-областей-экономики"></a>
## Практические вопросы различных областей экономики

<!--- [INFO] Источники периодически проставлены, но не в концовке

[POSITIVE_OR_NEUTRAL_REVIEW][REVIEW_IN_MEDIA][REVIEW_ONE_PAGE] Аркадий Коновалов — https://expert.ru/ural/2012/19/ekonomika-dlya-vseh/

[CRIM_POSSIBLE_BIAS] «Так, может, зря экономисты так много думают о неравенстве?»

[ACADEMIC_DEGREE] Ph.D. (kandidat) in Mathematics, 1998 — https://harris.uchicago.edu/files/2019-06/cv_sonin_april_2019.pdf . В экономике только MA. Department of Economics, Higher School of Economics (HSE University Moscow), Adjunct Professor of Economics; Department of Economics, University of Chicago, associated faculty; Stockholm Institute for Transition Economics (SITE), SSE, Affiliated Researcher, 2015. Проходит как профессор по тематической кафедре.

[CRIM_DIRECTION]

[Автор](https://harris.uchicago.edu/directory/konstantin-sonin)

[NO_PDF][NO_REVIEW][NO_SOURCES]

[BOOK_SAME] «Когда кончится нефть и другие уроки экономики (АСТ, 2019)». В библиотеке не это более позднее издание, поскольку я не нашёл его PDF или DJVU версию в свободном доступе.

[ADDITIONAL_READING] Валовой Дмитрий Васильевич, Гриценко Николай Николаевич, Якутин Юрий Васильевич — Научные принципы регулирования экономики

-->
1. Сонин Константин Исаакович — Уроки экономики (Юнайтед Пресс, 2011).pdf

<a id="Учебные-пособия-по-экономике"></a>
## Учебные пособия по экономике

<a id="Введение-в-экономику-для-школьников"></a>
### Введение в экономику для школьников

<!--- [INFO] Не нашёл сведений об учёных званиях Бойко; но редактор — PhD Бремзен Андрей Сергеевич — https://www.nes.ru/andrei-bremzen . Категория «редактор — учёный».

[DUPLICATE_GI]

[NOTE] No bio -->
1. [Бойко Мария](https://scholar.google.ru/citations?user=BaeJiW4AAAAJ) — Азы экономики (Книга по требованию, 2015).pdf

<a id="Основы-немецкой-и-российской-рыночной-экономики"></a>
### Основы немецкой и российской рыночной экономики

<!--- [INFO] О Кохе нашёл, что существует такой во Фленсбургском университете

[NOTE] В книге нет сведений о рецензентах

[BOOK_SERIES] Базовый курс

[DUPLICATE_GI]

[NOTE_FULL_NAME] Базелер Ульрих, Сабов Золтан, Хайнрих Йурген, Кох Вальтер — Основы экономической теории. Принципы, проблемы, политика. Германский опыт и российский путь (Питер, 2000)

-->
1. [Базелер Ульрих](https://www.wiwiss.fu-berlin.de/fachbereich/emeriti/basseler.html), [Сабов Золтан](http://ecrd.ru/?page_id=311), [Хайнрих Йурген](https://journalistik.tu-dortmund.de/institut/hochschullehrende/hochschullehrende-ir/prof-dr-juergen-heinrich/), [Кох Вальтер](https://www.wirtschaftsdienst.eu/autor/walter-a-s-koch.html) — Основы экономической теории. Принципы, проблемы, политика (Питер, 2000).pdf

<a id="Учебники-экономикс"></a>
### Учебники экономикс

<!--- [DUPLICATE_GI]

[BOOK_SERIES] Зарубежный учебник

[INFO] Указан редакционный совет издательства -->
1. [Бомол Уильям](https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=omB6ersAAAAJ), [Блайндер Алан](https://www.princeton.edu/blinder/bio.htm) — Экономикс. Принципы и политика (Юнити-Дана, 2015).pdf

<a id="Финансовая-грамотность"></a>
## Финансовая грамотность

<a id="Финансовая-грамотность-в-российских-реалиях"></a>
### Финансовая грамотность в российских реалиях

<!--- [DUPLICATE_GI]

[BOOK_SUPPORT] Citi Foundation

[INFO] Книга не содержит информации о рецензентах -->
1. [Горяев Алексей Петрович](https://www.nes.ru/dataupload/files/CV/2016/Goriaev-Alexei-CV.pdf), [Чумаченко Валерий Валерьевич](https://www.nes.ru/valerij-chumachenko) — Финансовая грамота (Российская экономическая школа, 2009).pdf

<a id="Фрикономика"></a>
## Фрикономика

<a id="NR-78"></a>
### NR

<a id="Ненаучные-утверждения-1"></a>
#### Ненаучные утверждения

<a id="Левитт-Стивен-Дабнер-Стивен"></a>
##### Левитт Стивен, Дабнер Стивен

<!--- [ACADEMIC_DEGREE] Левитт PhD, Economics — https://pricetheory.uchicago.edu/levitt/Levitt-CV.pdf

[JOURNALISM_DEGREE] Дабнер работал в «The New York Times», «The New Yorker», «Time» — https://www.wnyc.org/people/stephen-dubner/

[CRIM_SPEAKER] Левитт — https://www.ted.com/speakers/steven_levitt , Дабнер — https://www.harrywalker.com/speakers/stephen-dubner
-->
[Левитт](https://pricetheory.uchicago.edu/levitt/), [Дабнер](https://www.wnyc.org/people/stephen-dubner/)

<!--- [REVIEW_RETELLING] Annick Steta, docteur en sciences économiques — https://sci-hub.se/https://www.jstor.org/stable/44194598 ; [REVIEW_RETELLING] James W. Gentry, University of Nebraska–Lincoln — https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1015&context=marketingfacpub , [REVIEW_RETELLING] Umaima Arif, Pakistan Institute of Development Economics — https://thepdr.pk/pdr/index.php/pdr/article/view/2328/2328

[REVIEW_SMASHER][NO_SCIENCE_MEDIA] Joseph Romm, Ph.D., Physicis — «The sheer illogic and “patent nonsense” of the new book Superfreakonomics discussed in Part 1 is just the tip of the iceberg.», «Note also that this certainty about something completely unproven (i.e. large-scale aerosol-based geo-engineering), comes from a guy who seriously questions the real science of human-caused climate change.», «That’s why I call Myhrvold and his ilk, F.A.K.E.R.s — Famous “Authorities” whose Knowledge (of climate) is Extremely Rudimentary [Error-riddled?].», «Do these guys even have the most rudimentary notion of what “scientific evidence” is?» — https://grist.org/article/error-riddled-superfreakonomics-part-2/

[REVIEW_SMASHER][NO_SCIENCE_MEDIA] Elizabeth Kolbert, The New Yorker — Levitt and Dubner tell the horseshit story as a prelude to discussing climate change — https://meteor.geol.iastate.edu/classes/mt404/Papers/Geoengineering/Kolbert.pdf , «Neither Levitt, an economist, nor Dubner, a journalist, has any training in climate science—or, for that matter, in science of any kind», «Given their emphasis on cold, hard numbers, it’s noteworthy that Levitt and Dubner ignore what are, by now, whole libraries’ worth of data on globalwarming. Indeed, just about everything they have to say on the topic is, factually speaking, wrong.», «“The problem wasn’t necessarily that you talked to the wrong experts or talked to too few of them,” he observes. “The problem was that you failed todo the most elementary thinking.», «“Really simple arithmetic, which you could not be botheredto do, would have been enough to tell you,” he writes, that this claim “is complete and utter nonsense.», «But what’s most troubling about “SuperFreakonomics” isn’t the authors’ many blunders; it’s the whole spirit of the enterprise. Though climate changeis a grave problem, Levitt and Dubner treat it mainly as an opportunity to show how clever they are.», «All of which goes to show that, while some forms of horseshit are no longer a problem, others will always be with us»

[REVIEW_SMASHER][NO_SCIENCE_MEDIA] Russ Walker — «In the now infamous chapter in the newly released SuperFreakonomics, Steven Levitt and Stephen Dubner manage to downplay the global warming threat, compare climate change believers to religious fanatics, and accept at face value the assertion by some pointy-headed geeks that they can save the world on the cheap.», «These are fascinating ideas. But they’re just that — ideas based on some pretty big leaps of faith, i.e. that these things can be engineered, that someone will fund them, and, moreover, that the solutions will actually do enough to cool the planet.»

[REVIEW_SMASHER][NO_SCIENCE_MEDIA] Michael Mann, Ph.D. Yale University, Department of Geology & Geophysics ( https://michaelmann.net/about/cv ) — https://www.huffpost.com/entry/nate-silver-climate-change_b_1909482 — «Super Freakonomics — a book that, perhaps better than any other, serves as a cautionary tale of the dangers that lurk when academics attempt to draw sweeping conclusions in fields well outside their area of training. In Super Freakonomics as you might guess, Levitt drew questionable conclusions about climate change and related energy issues based on an extrapolation of principles of economics way, way, way, outside their domain of applicability. Even some very basic physics calculations, for example, reveal that his dismissal of solar energy as a viable alternative to fossil fuel energy in combating climate change because of possible waste heat is total nonsense. Ray Pierrehumbert, a chaired professor himself at the University of Chicago, in the Department of Geosciences, pointed this and other serious errors out to Levitt in an open letter that concluded with a campus map showing how easy it would have been for Levitt to walk over to his office to discuss his ideas and, presumably, avoid the serious pitfalls that ended up undermining much of what he ended up saying in his book about climate change and energy policy.»

[NO_SCEDRECO][NO_PDF] -->
1. Суперфрикономика (Манн, Иванов и Фербер, 2010).epub
<!--- [REVIEW_SMASHER] Andrew Gelman, Kaiser Fung, «American Scientists» — http://www.stat.columbia.edu/~gelman/research/published/freakwww.pdf — «We and others have noted a discouraging tendency in the Freakonomics body of work to present speculative or even erroneous claims with an air of certainty.», «In our analysis of the Freakonomics approach, we encountered a range of avoidable mistakes, from back-of-the-envelope analyses gone wrong tounexamined assumptions to an uncritical reliance on the work of Levitt’s friends and colleagues.», «Our point is not that Das Gupta had to be right and Oster wrong, but that Levitt and Dubner, in their celebration of economics and economists, suspended their critical thinking»

[POSITIVE_OR_NEUTRAL_REVIEW] Maria Aluchna, doktorem nauk ekonomicznych — http://www.e-mentor.edu.pl/artykul/index/numer/16/id/323 ; Thomas C. Leonard, Princeton University — https://sci-hub.se/https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10602-005-2836-z

[BOOK_OR_AUTHOR_OR_CONCEPT_CRITICISM] John Di Nardo, University of Michigan — https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/7b86/9f41e3a0514747a9ebfb24a9aad132cc5e44.pdf — «However, Freakonomicsis more about “entertainment” than it is a serious attempt at popularization.», «If were one to judge Economics by reading Freakonomics alone, however, it would appear that some economists are successfully going after much bigger game, with economic theory leading the way. How else could a study about professional Sumo speak to anything but the unusual context of Sumo?»

[NO_SCEDRECO] -->
1. Фрикономика. Экономист-хулиган и журналист-сорвиголова исследуют скрытые причины всего на свете (Альпина Паблишер, 2016).pdf

<a id="Экономика-благодарности"></a>
## Экономика благодарности

<a id="NR-79"></a>
### NR

<a id="Успехмэны"></a>
#### Успехмэны

<!--- [NO_ACADEMIC_OR_PROFESSIONAL_DEGREE] https://www.garyvaynerchuk.com/biography/

[CRIM_SPEAKER] https://speaking.com/speakers/gary-vaynerchuk/

[POSITIVE_OR_NEUTRAL_REVIEW][REVIEW_ONE_PAGE] Stephanie O’Donohoe, The University of Edinburgh, Gareth Kay, Silverstein & Partners, SanFrancisco — https://sci-hub.se/10.2501/IJA-30-4-721-722 — «People were already feeling sick and tired of being ignored by business and treated as mere consumers. So the first big takeaway is that success comes from treating people as people, not as consumers – to treat others as you would wish to be treated.»

[BOOK_OR_AUTHOR_OR_CONCEPT_CRITICISM] Mark Ritson, PhD Marketing ( https://www.lancaster.ac.uk/lums/about-us/alumni/alumni-profiles/58259 ) — «It’s therefore highly appropriate that, in this age of Facebook and social media, the most influential media thinker of our current age is Gary Vaynerchuk.», «It’s the fact that he is so frequently wrong. And that fallibility multiplied by the fame he now enjoys means that his wrongness echoes around marketing and media circles like a giant, ongoing thunderstorm of bullshit. Truly, he is an appropriate media guru for our post-modern, post-truth times.», «Is course correction possible or even preferable when you are making so much money talking nonsense? The likely option – the only option – is to carry on being Gary Vaynerchuk and being wrong, wrong, wrong, wrong, wrong about media.»

[NOTE] По моему мнению, подходящая категория для Вайнерчука — «успехмены».

[NO_SCEDRECO][NO_SOURCES] -->
1. [Вайнерчук Гари](https://www.marketingweek.com/mark-ritson-gary-vaynerchuk/) — Лайкни меня! Экономика благодарности (Альпина Паблишер, 2012).pdf

<a id="Экономическая-методология"></a>
## Экономическая методология

<a id="Разговор-в-среде-экономистов"></a>
### Разговор в среде экономистов

<!--- [ACADEMIC_DEGREE] “Ph.D. in Economics, Duke University, May, 1981” — http://www.klamer.nl/about-klamer/

[ACADEMIC_DEGREE_EDITOR] Расков Данила Евгеньевич, кандидат экономических наук (СПбГУ, 2000) — https://artesliberales.spbu.ru/ru/faculty/personalii/raskov

[POSITIVE_OR_NEUTRAL_REVIEW][REVIEW_RETELLING] David Teira, research associate of the Urrutia Elejalde Foundation — http://e-spacio.uned.es/fez/eserv/bibliuned:20071/Klamer.pdf

[BOOK_OR_AUTHOR_OR_CONCEPT_CRITICISM] Erwin Dekker, a PhD candidate, Erasmus University Rotterdam — https://repub.eur.nl/pub/51455/Metis_199811.pdf — «However the most important weak point of the book is an unresolved tension between the style of Klamer’s argument and the content of his argument. The style of the argument is that of an accessible conversation in which everyone is invited to join in; the content of the argument however is largely negative and depicts a conversation that is almost impossible to join.», «He is desperately trying to explain to outsiders why economics is the way it is. He wants to be held accountable by the general public for what he and his colleagues are doing inside the ivory tower, and I would say rightly so.», «A conversation that is turned inward is too easy to ignore, something that politicians are very prone to do. It is truly unfortunate that Klamer does not make this argument explicit. By introducing a concept like accountability within his theory about the conversation, he could have strengthened it greatly.», «Overall, I think that while Klamer’s characterisation might be quite appropriate for the late modernistic economic conversation of the seventies and eighties, it does not do justice to the changes in that conversation since»;

Adam G. Martin, George Mason University — https://sci-hub.se/https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0167268109000079 — «On the whole, this approach seems like a valuable contribution to the sociology of economic knowledge. Some substantialdifficulties and shortcomings, however, prevent me from giving it too glowing a review», «Such methodologists act like “philosopher-kings” imposing value judgments “ex cathedra”», «I do not wish to claim that this book will lead young souls astray intomethodological nihilism. The pitfall it faces is perhaps worse: I fear it will fall through the cracks entirely», «Consequently, I cannot recommend the book as an introduction to economics orguide to the layman», «As stated above, I find some of the substantive content lacking. In addition, the description of differentcamps in economics seems about twenty years out of date. Klamer is still talking about New Classical macroeconomics; theresurgence of political economy and the rise of development and (new) institutional economics are nowhere to be seen. Still,as a field guide to thecultureof economists, it remains spot on.»

[ADDITIONAL_READING] Brennan Jason — «Against Democracy»

Raf Geenens, Ronald Tinnevelt (editors) — «Does Truth Matter?: Democracy and Public Space»

Michèle Lamont — How professors think: inside the curious world of academic judgment

[BOOK_SERIES] Новое экономическое мышление

[BOOK_SUPPORT] Издательство «Международные отношения», Факультет свободных искусств и наук СПбГУ -->
1. [Кламер Арьо](https://www.eur.nl/en/people/arjo-klamer) — Странная наука экономика. Приглашение к разговору (Издательство Института Гайдара, 2015).pdf

<a id="Экономические-развитие-и-рост"></a>
## Экономические развитие и рост

<a id="Институциональное-объяснение-различий-в-развитии"></a>
### Институциональное объяснение различий в развитии

<a id="HC-15"></a>
#### HC

<!--- [POSITIVE_OR_NEUTRAL_REVIEW][REVIEW_RETELLING] Hafzullah Genç, Hitit Üniversitesi — https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/322890 — «Kitap rönesans ve sonrası Batı'nın gelişimi ve bugünkü du-ruma gelişi hakkında kıymetli bilgiler ve görüşler ihtiva ediyor. Fa-kat açıkça söylemek gerekirse rönesans öncesinde toplumlar arasın-daki eşitsizliğin kökenleri hakkında bir hüküm belirtmede yetersiz kalıyor. Yine de belirli bir dönem için probleme çözüm bulma nok-tasında aynı amaçla yazılmış pek çok kitabın önüne geçiyor.»

Colin Jennings, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow — https://sci-hub.se/https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0176268012000614 — «I suspect some professional historians may grimace at such a wide-ranging approach, as they may feel that the discussion of each historical case lacks depth and is partial, only seeking evidence that backs the theory.»

Șerban Olah, Universitatea din Oradea — http://www.revistasociologieromaneasca.ro/sr/article/download/2016_1_olah/25 — «Aș dori să fac precizarea că dupăpărerea mea această carte este una din contri-buțiile de vârf la nivel mondial care explică ro-lul instituțiilor în realizarea performanțelor economice, continuând o tradiție remarcabilă a unor nume ilustre precum Olson (1999), North (2003) sau Knack și Keefer (1995).», «Ceea ce am constatat cu plăcută surprin-dere este că autorii nu doar că au scris o carte foarte complexă, cu multe exemple, explicații și scrisă într-un limbaj extrem de accesibil pu-blicului larg, dar ei sunt gata să probeze tot ceea ce afirmă cu explicații statistice foarte», «Consider că această carte merită citită nu doar de către economiști. Cred că ea este utilăîn egală măsură sociologilor, politologilor, is-toricilor sau oricărui specialist în științele so-cio-comportamentale.»

Klemens H. Fisher, Ständige Vertretung Österreichs bei der Europäischen Union — https://sci-hub.se/https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12399-013-0380-x — «dass sie die US-Amerikanische Entwicklung als durchweg positiv exemplarisch darstellen, ist das erste – und wohl im gesamten Buch griffigste – Beispiel für ihre These politisch als brisant anzusehen», «Wenn das Buch Warum Nationen scheitern einen einzigen Wermutstropfen aufweist, dann liegt es daran, dass in der deutschen Übersetzung des Ori-ginals Why Nations Fail der englischsprachige Wortwitz und Duktus gelegentlich auf der Strecke bleibt, wobei die Übersetzung als solche damit keineswegs kritisiert werden soll»

[REVIEW_LONG][REVIEW_HIGH_ERUDITION][REVIEW_SAYS_LITTLE] William Bentley MacLeod — http://pop.iies.su.se/reviews/McLeod_2012.pdf — «However, it is surprising that nei-ther book discusses the role of markets, nor cites Milton Friedman (1962)’s book Capitalism and Freedom. These days few economists would argue thatcentral planning is more effective than a market economy», «However, it is somewhat surprising thatWhy Nations Fail?does not even mention Arrow’s theorem», «The second issue is the formation of beliefs. Both books assume that agentsunderstand the consequences of their actions.Why Nations Fail? explicitly discounts the importance of information in a section they callThe Ignorance Hypothesis11. It claims that lack of knowledge cannot explain national success», «Neither book under review is very clear regarding the factors thatthey assume are time invariant.», «The second reason for its success is that it relentlessly takes a singularview regarding why nations fail. It feeds our desire to have a single, simple solution for all our ills.», «There are, however, dangers of using an elegant model to guide real worlddecision making», «Both authors seem to miss the point that is an essential feature of opensocieties, such as the US, is the freedom to act. In the US, individuals are freeto steal, shoot their colleagues at work, take bribes, threaten others and drivedangerously. We observe all these behaviors. What keeps things under moreor less control is that there are sanctions for each of these choices that determost individuals. Repressive societies often control some of these behaviorswith closer monitoring of individuals (as in the former Soviet Union), forexample by closely monitoring the movement of individuals via check points», «Neither book discusses the role of inter-national competition for both capital and labor.»

[BOOK_OR_AUTHOR_OR_CONCEPT_CRITICISM][REVIEW_LONG] Michele Boldrin, David K. Levine and Salvatore Modica — http://www.dklevine.com/general/aandrreview.pdf — «It is well known that if you want four opinions you should put three economists in a room. So it will not come as a surprise that we do not agree with everything in the book.», «Unfortunately there is no way to know whether our current inclusive institutions will continue to exhibit continued growth in the future. Acemoglu and Robinson argue that China must eventually stop growing because institutions there are extractive. At the moment there is no way to tell if this is true, especially because we certainly cannot rule out that the Chinese institutions evolve into inclusive ones», «The fact is that Acemoglu and Robinson do not seem to do justice to the importance of competition between nations. Nowhere is this illustrated more strongly than in the case of Germany the case we find the most troubling for the Acemoglu and Robinson theory», «Nazi Germany was one of the most extractive institutions in history committing genocide against its own citizens and institutionalizing forced slave labor. Yet Germany was economically prosperous, highly innovative, and came within a hair’s breadth of world domination. This was avoided largely because of the efforts and good fortune of another extremely extractive country: Stalinist Russia.», «Historical evidence broadly supports the idea that competition between countries has been a potent force in driving innovation and subsequently growth», «Indeed, with respect to the Acemoglu and Robinson theory, one is tempted to point out that Russia did well under extractive communist institutions. These institutions were overturned by a civilian coup-d’etat that was enabled by a failed military coup-d’état. The resulting inclusive political institutions oversaw the complete economic ruin of the country.», «So: this is a great book and a great read go and get it. As with any good book it is provocative, so don’t forget to bring a healthy dose of skepticism. And while learning why nations fail may put us on the path to preventing their failure sadly we are not there yet.»

[REVIEW_IN_MEDIA][REVIEW_SMASHER] Jeffrey D. Sachs, Director of the Earth Institute — https://www.foreignaffairs.com/reviews/review-essay/2012-08-16/government-geography-and-growth — «Although "most social scientists shun monocausal, simple, and broadly applicable theories," Acemoglu and Robinson write, they themselves have chosen just such a "simple theory and used it to explain the main contours of economic and political development around the world since the Neolithic Revolution."», «The authors’ story is soothing. Western readers will no doubt take comfort in the idea that democracy and prosperity go hand in hand and that authoritarian countries are bound to either democratize or run out of economic steam. This tale sounds good, but it is simplistic.», «Acemoglu and Robinson's simple narrative contains a number of conceptual shortcomings. For one, the authors incorrectly assume that author-itarian elites are necessarily hostile to economic progress.», «A society without civil, political, and property rights may indeed find it difficult to encourage innovation outside the military sector, but it often has a relatively easy time adopting technologies that have already been developed elsewhere.», «The overarching effect of these analytic shortcomings is that when Acemoglu and Robinson purport to explain why nations fail to grow, they act like doctors trying to confront many different illnesses with only one diagnosis. In any system with many interacting components, whether a sick body or an underperforming economy, failure can arise for any number of reasons. The key to troubleshooting complex systems is to perform what physicians call a "differential diagnosis": a determination of what has led to the system failure in a particular place and time.», «To make a convincing case that political institutions alone determine economic development, one would have to conduct an exceptionally rigorous analysis to over-come the huge amount of data strongly suggesting that other factors also play an important role in development; as the astrophysicist Carl Sagan said, "Extraor-dinary claims require extraordinary evidence." Yet Acemoglu and Robinson do nothing of the sort. And even their own narratives betray a chronic blindness to competing explanations.», «Whereas South Korea and Taiwan became democracies after the economic reforms of their authoritarian rulers, China and Vietnam have not yet democratized, and Singapore is semidemocratic. These outcomes contradict Acemoglu and Robinson's theory that inclusive political institutions pave the way for growth and that without such institutions, economies will inevitably sputter out.», «Botswana's diamond revenues, which soared to over $1,000 per citizen, have provided more than half of all its export earnings and a substantial proportion of its budget receipts. Yet in Acemoglu and Robinson's telling, diamonds are just a sideshow.», «Throughout the book, Acemoglu and Robinson see what they want to see -so much so that even when they stumble on the world's richest diamond mine, they can't seem to understand that geography has something to do with economic development.», «Acemoglu and Robinson gloss over another obvious point: inclusive political institutions have presided over decidedly extractive practices conducted abroad or directed against minorities at home -indeed, some of the greatest abuses of humanity. In the eighteenth century, Europe sated its sweet tooth with sugar cane produced by slave labor in the Caribbean. Manchester's fabrics in the mid-nineteenth century were woven from cotton picked by slaves in the U.S. South.», «Consider how ineffectual the theory would have been at foretelling the global winners and losers in economic development from 1980 to 2010. At the start of 1980, an economist basing his judgments of future economic performance on political and civil rights during the preceding decade or so might have foolishly bet on Gambia, Ecuador, or Suriname and almost entirely missed the rapid growth of authoritarian East Asia, most notably China. From 1980 to the present, many developing countries with undemocratic and highly corrupt governments grew faster than many poor countries with democratic and less corrupt governments.», «Despite all these problems with Acemoglu and Robinson's theory, readers will have sympathy for their approach. The authors tell a story many want to hear: that Western democracy pays off not only politically but also economically. Yet real economic life is neither so straightforward nor so fair. Authoritarian regimes sometimes achieve rapid growth, and democracies sometimes languish. Acemoglu and Robinson's story is sometimes right: politics matters, and bad governments can indeed kill development.»

[REVIEW_SELF-PUBLISHING] Nathan Smith, PhD — https://openborders.info/blog/response-to-paul-collier-chapter-2/ — «Why Nations Fail, is one of the most over-rated books I’ve ever read. It’s fatally unrigorous, equally destitute of formal theory and econometrics.» «Honest empirical work on the democracy => growth causal link suggests that the effect is basically nil. But Acemoglu and Robinson’s tendentiously fact-packed and conceptually confusing tome has given development economists a pretext for taking a more politically correct view.»

[REVIEW_LONG][REVIEW_HIGH_ERUDITION] Peter Vries, University Vienna — https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.832.8954&rep=rep1&type=pdf — «When it comes to the history of the Ottoman and Mughal Empires, and of Ming and Qing China, the authors have over-looked or chosen not to take on board– fundamental revisions in scholarship. There, for example, is no reference at all to the major revisions su-ggested by scholars like Kenneth Pomeranz, Roy Bin Wong or Andre Gunder Frank with regard to the history of China in the early modern era», «The extensive literatureabout the role of the state in economic development that defends other positions than the authors is not confronted»; «If the corollary of their view would be that it is common knowledge what causes economies to grow, that would be a quite surprising assumption. It clearly is not. Economists fiercely and fundamentally disagree amongst each other on the causes of the wealth and poverty of nations», «The suggestion that before the Glorious Revolution property had always been insecure and badly defined is very far fetched. Julian Hoppit even claims, that in many respectsproperty rights were less well protected after the Glorious Revolution!», «The authors e.g. simply refer to the bad institutions of Guatemala in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries without any reference to the interference by the United States in the internal affaires of that country (345-351) Admittedly, international dimensions are prominent in their book when it comes to the colonial originsof poverty but then seriously neglected when it comes to developments in independent countries after de-colonization or in countries that even though they formally had always been independent never had real sovereignty.», «When I confine myself to the early modern eraand to economic extraction(the field of my expertise), I must say the comparisons in the book are rather superficial and tend to bebiased in favour of the West.», «All policies and ideas that are not in line with the institutionalist mainstream are simplyignored.Even Dani Rodrik, who grounds his work in neo-classical eco-nomic analysis, in a recent book came up with a much broader range ofgovernment tasks», «For that I would characterise it as too monocausal, too repetitive, too categorical in its claims, too vague in its central concepts and its comparisons, too weak on international political economy, too focused on proving its thesis and too negligent when it comes to testing it.»

[REVIEW_LONG][REVIEW_META] Lisa Schlesewsky/Simon Winter, Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster — https://sci-hub.se/https://doi.org/10.1515/ordo-2018-0021 — «Mo-nokausalität eine Schwäche der Institutionentheorie von Acemoğlu und Robinson. Eslohnt nämlich, sich die alternativen Erklärungsansätze genauer anzuschauen», «Folglich hinterfragt Sachs die von Acemoğluund Robinson unterstellte Kausalitätsrichtung: Er nennt beispielhaft Südkorea undTaiwan als Länder, in welchen zunächst ökonomische Reformen und erst später po-litische Demokratisierung stattfanden. Diese Beobachtung passt auch bspw. zur em-pirischen Studie von Barro (1996), die politische Freiheiten als eine Art „Luxusgut“», «In jedem Fallhat man es aber wohl mit einem Endogenitätsproblem mit unklarer Kausalitätsrich-tung zu tun, dem Acemoğlu und Robinson nicht gerecht werden», «Sachs (2012) formuliert daher treffend zum Absolutheitsanspruch von Acemoğluund Robinson: „they act like doctors trying to confront many different illnesses withonly one diagnosis“», «Hätten sich Acemoğlu und Robinson in der deutschsprachigen Literatur undinsbesondere in den Grundlagenwerken der deutschen Ordnungsökonomen umge-schaut, so hätten sie in Walter Eucken sicherlich einen Vorreiter gefunden und nichtnur das: Wesentliche Thesen von Acemoğlu und Robinson wurden von Eucken bereitsetwa sechs Jahrzehnte zuvor inGrundsätze der Wirtschaftspolitikformuliert – und dasnicht selten differenzierter und vollständiger», «Der Versuch Acemoğlus und Robinsons einer ökonomischen Weltformel, einer „theoryof everything“, auf der Suche nach den Wurzeln des Wohlstands muss als gescheitertverbucht werden.», «Durch ihren Exklusivitätsanspruch sind die Autoren nicht im Stande, die öko-nomischen Entwicklungen in zahlreichen Staaten zu erklären, etwa den rohstoffbe-dingten Wohlstand der Golfstaaten, die Armut im relativ inklusiven Indien oder dasanhaltende Wachstum im autoritären China.», «Lobenswert sind dennoch die Versuche der Autoren, falsifizierbare Vorhersagenabzugeben», «Auch die Klassifikation von Institutionen als „extraktiv“ oder „in-klusiv“ ist eine Neuheit und eine wichtige Errungenschaft des Buches»

Luis Guillermo Vélez Álvarez, Doctor en Economía de la Universidad de Paris X — http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0121-47722013000200012 — «Pero falta una pieza en el esquema sin la cual resultaría imposible explicar ciertas anomalías históricas. La Rusia de Lenin y Stalin se industrializó y creció vigorosamente durante varias décadas después de la Revolución de Octubre. Su ciencia avanzó: sus científicos desarrollaron la bomba atómica y pusieron en órbita el primer objeto creado por el hombre. Su avance económico suscitó la admiración de muchos intelectuales y economistas occidentales que, ciegos ante las tropelías de un régimen criminal, veían allá el comienzo del camino esplendoroso de la humanidad. Seguramente la mayoría de sus habitantes llegaron a disfrutar de una mejor situación económica que la de sus antepasados de la época zarista.», «Debe celebrarse, en primer lugar, que los autores hayan rescatado las ideas schumpeterianas de los librillos sobre innovación y emprendimiento en los que abrevan los estudiantes de las escuelas mediocres de Administración y Economía2.», «Me parece que algunos de los párrafos dedicados a Colombia son la parte más deplorable de este libro. Afloran las generalidades, los prejuicios y afirmaciones lapidarias que no tienen otro sustento que los testimonios de un criminal y las "investigaciones" de una ONG politizada. Veamos algunas "perlas".», «Aquí la falta de rigor llega a extremos inimaginables.»

[REVIEW_LONG] Joanna Dzionek-Kozłowska, Rafał Matera, Uniwersytet Łódzki — http://yadda.icm.edu.pl/yadda/element/bwmeta1.element.doi-10_33119_GN_100758/c/gna-pdf-100758-33155.pdf https://dspace.uni.lodz.pl/xmlui/bitstream/handle/11089/19304/LEWP_9_2016.pdf — «Despite the indicated ambiguities, we would like to clearly state that it is not our intention to question the high value of Acemoglu and Robinson’s contribution to economic development theory.», «The paper concludes by the statement that Acemoglu and Robinson’s unconvincing rejection of the culture hypothesis paradoxically may be regarded as a justification of the importance of culture-related factors.», «We do not deny that in some cases this approach could be quite useful, first and foremost to speak about consolidateddemocracies. However, assuming that the institutional order in authoritarian, and especially totalitarian regimes is a result of those societies’ collective choices is difficult to agree with.», «Therefore, from this reasoning, aconclusion may be drawn that the image of the human being they tacitly take is closer to the mainstream economics model of homo oeconomicusthan to any other species», «Yet, once again, as we emphasized in the introductory part of the article, we would like to highlight that besides lots of theoretical doubts regarding Acemoglu and Robinson’s concept, we do agree the with their message that the decisions ofauthorities have a huge impacton the inclusion ofnewsocial groupsinboth political and economic activities, which in turn exerts a strong influence onthe economic development of societies. However, as we have demonstrated in the previous sections of the article, their omission of the influence of the culture-related factors of economic development is unwarranted by their theory.»

[REVIEW_LONG][REVIEW_HIGH_ERUDITION] (Да, опять они, но работа другая) Joanna Dzionek-Kozłowska, Rafał Matera, Uniwersytet Łódzki — http://yadda.icm.edu.pl/yadda/element/bwmeta1.element.doi-10_33119_GN_100758/c/gna-pdf-100758-33155.pdf — «Należy jednak zaznaczyć, że warstwa teoretyczna wskazanej książki jest bardzo uproszczona w porównaniu z bardziej „tech-nicznymi”, sformalizowanymi artykułami czy rozdziałami publikowanymi w pracach zbiorowych oraz czasopismach naukowych autorstwa tego samego zespołu (lub we współpracy z innymi badaczami). Z tego względu w tym art-kule uznano za zasadne uzupełnienie analizy wywodu Acemoglu i Robinsona przedstawionego w ich najnowszej książce o inne ich publikacje.», «Podsumowując ten przegląd najważniejszych stanowisk na temat źródeł roz-woju gospodarczego należy podkreślić, że cechą wspólną znaczącej większości ostatnich prac z tej dziedziny jest świadomość ich autorów, iż podejmowany przez nich problem jest zbyt złożony, by można go ująć w ramy jakiejkolwiek deterministycznej teorii. Samo zrozumienie tego faktu wydaje się być pokłosiem spektakularnego fiaska prób tworzenia całościowych teorii rozwoju gospodar-czego podejmowanych przez ekonomistów w XVIII i XIX wieku», «Pomimo tak szerokiego spojrzenia, w pracy Acemo-glu i Robinsona brakuje informacji o instytucjonalnych doświadczeniach Europy Środkowo--Wschodniej, w tym z Polski (aczkolwiek wspomnianej raz w całej książce przy okazji analizy poddaństwa w końcu średniowiecza). Zaskakujący jest też brak odniesień do starożytnej Grecji, zwłaszcza demokracji ateńskiej, uznawanej powszechnie za źródło tego systemu politycznego.», «Acemoglu i Robinson przyjmują dość heroiczne założenie, że zarówno instytucje polityczne, jak i gospodarcze kształtują się na sku-tek kolektywnych wyborów dokonywanych przez członków poszczegól-nych społeczności. O ile zaakceptowanie tego rodzaju założenia wydaje się zasadne w przypadku państw o skonsolidowanych systemach demo-kratycznych, o tyle przyjęcie go w odniesieniu do krajów o systemach rzą-dów autorytarnych czy tym bardziej totalitarnych wydaje się pomysłem chybionym», «wydawniczy książki wydaje się po części związany z faktem, iż ogólna wy-mowa koncepcji Acemoglu i Robinsona jest tym łatwiejsza do zaakceptowa-nia, że elementy, które podkreślają, są powszechnie uznawane za kluczowe dla umocowania rozwoju gospodarczego na stabilnych podstawach», «Jednak szczegółowa analiza przedstawianej przez nich koncepcji ujaw-nia istotne wątpliwości dotyczące ich rozumowania oraz nie do końca roz-strzygnięte kwestie. Najbardziej problematycznym aspektem teorii Acemoglu i Robinsona pozostaje ich opór wobec hipotezy kulturowej i postawienie jej w opozycji do hipotezy instytucjonalnej. Takie stanowisko może być zrozumiałe, jeśli spojrzeć na rzecz z perspektywy marketingu idei –starań o popularyzację własnej koncepcji jako nowatorskiego, wyraźnie odróżniającego się od pro-ponowanych wcześniej wyjaśnień przyczyn bogactwa narodów. Jednak takie podejście prowadzi do zasadniczych problemów w zrozumieniu i zaakcepto-waniu teorii Acemoglu i Robinsona», «Osim toga, ne pokušavaju odvojiti utjecaj kolonijalne prošlosti pod izrabljivačkim političkim i ekonomskim institucijama od američke vanjske politike u 20. stoljeću na situaciju u kojem se danas nalazi Latinska Amerika.»

Kristijan Kotarski, PhD in Comparative Political Economy ( https://www.fpzg.unizg.hr/staff/kristijan.kotarski ) — https://www.bib.irb.hr/687921/download/687921.Recenzija_Acemoglu_i_Robinson.pdf — «Naravno da takav stav umanjuje prediktivnu vrijednost njihove teorije što autori pravdaju njezinom korisnošću u pristupu policy analize s obzirom da joj je glavni cilj izbjeći loše policy savjete temeljene na netočnim hipotezama o funkcioniranju institucija.», «U odnosu na prvu hipotezu, ulogu geografskih faktora i klime, autori čine klasičnu studentsku pogrešku odabira slučajeva na temelju ovisne varijable. U želji da pobiju zaključke Jeffreya Sachsa o ključnoj ulozi tropskih bolesti i utjecaja tropske klime na nižu stopu poljoprivredne produktivnosti zemalja u tropskim geografskim širinama, autori navode primjere Singapura, Malezije, Bocvane. Međutim, na svaki prethodno spomenuti primjer uspješnih nacija s otvorenim političkih i ekonomskim institucijama dolazi nekoliko suprotnih primjera. Osim toga, autori ističu primjer Bocvane kao uspješne subsaharske zemlje oslanjajući se isključivo na podatke o ekonomskom rastu dok zanemaruju činjenicu da se zbog epidemije AIDS-a očekivana životna dob smanjila za više od 25 godina od 1990. godine.», «Različit put kojega su prešle arapske naftne monarhije i azijski tigrovi svakako predstavljaju primjer različite procjene vladajućih elita. One su često bazirane na pogrešnoj mentalnoj računici koja emanira iz različitog korpusa znanja i ideja odgovornih za drugačiju procjenu vlastitog interesa. Dakle, vidljivo je da autori u pokušaju što elegantnijeg zaokruživanja svojeg središnjeg argumenta o inkluzivnim i otvorenim političkim i ekonomskim institucijama implicite marginaliziraju određena konkurentska objašnjenja.», «Nažalost, na toj ideji stasale su generacije ekonomista i politologa pri čemu Pareto optimalno stanje postoji samo u apstraktnom svijetu neoklasične sinteze koji je miljama daleko od stvarnog svijeta u kojemu prevladavaju tržišne nesavršenosti poput monopola, negativnih eksternalija i asimetričnih informacija.» «Knjiga Why Nations Fail? svakako je preporučljivo akademsko štivo koje obiluje nizom odličnih i zanimljivih primjera koji čitatelja potiču na dodatna pitanja i odgovore u istraživačkom području od iznimne kompleksnosti i važnosti, ne samo za akademsku zajednicu, već za svijet 21. stoljeća.»

Rubén Méndez, Universidad de Macquarie — https://revistas.udea.edu.co/index.php/lecturasdeeconomia/article/view/18544/15929 — «Recordemos que nos encontramos técnicamente frente a un trade book −aunque por su nivel de impacto y éxito comercial se le puede catalogar como un best seller; esto ha significado un sacrificio de aspectos tales como el rigor científico.», «El libro Why Nations Fail? constituye una pobre crónica descriptiva de acontecimientos históricos, dado que no se asienta en el estudio de fuentes primarias o secundarias (crítica también formulada por McCloskey a North). Por el contrario, el texto hace un recuento superficial de acontecimientos historiográficos accesibles a través de la consulta de literatura introductoria.», «Tal como lo ha subrayado Alonso “El texto introduce hipótesis que no se confirman por los recuentos empíricos introducidos. Por el contrario, estas hipótesis han sido construidas en función de las necesidades de la confirmación de la hipótesis”. En este sentido, los autores olvidan la preponderancia que un análisis teórico debe tener frente al instrumento ilustrativo: la historia», «Estas críticas se suman a una anotación por muchos pasada por alto: el pobre manejo transdisciplinario del texto −en el sentido propuesto por Mittelstrass (2011)−. Es decir, la incapacidad de Why Nations Fail? por reflejar un robusto programa de investigación que a su vez sea una expresión de investigación integradora», «Queremos concluir puntualizando que se ha buscado presentar una revisión objetiva. Aunque consideramos que el libro representa una contribución interesante y, por lo tanto, recomendable al lector no especializado, también hemos apuntado a mostrar algunas de las debilidades del texto.»

Jenina Joy Chavez, Action for Economic Reforms — https://aer.ph/industrialpolicy/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/PPSJ-JC-review-of-Acemoglu-and-Robinson.pdf — «Acemoglu and Robinson basically said that South Korea was a success becauseeconomic actors were allowed to do what they wanted. But even the World Bank (1993)acknowledged that the South Korean state was directing the economy, that is, economicactors were only allowed to function as long as what they did went towards the directionset out by the state.», «Yet, every example presented inthe book is of the liberal kind, and the protestation about IMF imposition only replicatesthe debate about sequencing, timing and preconditions. This makes their thesis dangerous,as it tends to ascribe ultimate blame on institutional arrangements, political economy and polity, and falls completely silent on the underlying assumptions about the economic framework.», «In sum, the quest for good institutions will always be good. Equally desirable,however, is an expansion of purpose beyond just the defense of a free market.»

David Fowkes, PhD degree in International Relations — https://hsf.org.za/publications/focus/focus-66/DFowkes.pdf — «What made them so special? It’s almost certainly not inclusiveness – South Korea, for instance, only democratised in the late 1980s, and before that experienced highly repressive Japanese colonialism followed by decades of home-grown authoritarianism.», «Finally, A&R omit any discussion of countries with inclusive institutions which failed, such as Brazil before the coup of 1964, Chile before 1973, Argentina (at many points) or Venezuela before Chávez. These countries have been notoriously prone to populism, macroeconomic crisis and regime instability, defects to which inclusivity surely contributed. A&R might respond that they actually slipped into the vicious circle that replicates extractive institutions, but that’s a dubious tactic leading to question-begging.», «Their definition of ‘extractive’ institutions is very broad, incorporating cases as different as Mugabe’s Zimbabwe, Mubarak’s Egypt, and contemporary China; at one point they even argue that parts of the Indian bureaucracy exemplify the persistence of extractive institutions. The danger is that any case of failure can be defined as extractive. Rather, their thesis requires that inclusion itself not be a source of failure, and by ignoring that problem A&R commit selection bias, a consequence of adopting an anecdotal approach in place of a structured, focussed comparison.», «The lesson is that creating inclusive institutions is also dangerous, and we need to study threats arising not just from resurgent extractive systems but also from the new ones.»

Lala Muradova Huseynova, PhD Researcher at the Centre for Political Science Research ( https://soc.kuleuven.be/centre-for-political-research/Personeel/00114841 ) — https://recyt.fecyt.es/index.php/recp/article/download/39004/pdf_16 — «However, this oeuvre has several shortcomings. Firstly, the determination of the authors to fully debunk the previous explanations of global inequality (namely culture, geographic and ignorance hypotheses) undermines the importance of a constellation of intertwining factors in leading the country towards the prosperity or poverty.», «What is more, the authors extensively disregard the role of the international patronage to and external legitimacy of either poverty or prosperity in developing countries which could be due to the geopolitics of nations. Azerbaijan, a Post-soviet country, richly endowed with oil and gas, is considered to be a strategic energy partner to the EU. The fact itself serves as an excuse for the country’s government to get away with endemic corruption, neopatrimonialism, overly extractive institutions and disastrous state of political rights in its soil. Should Azerbaijan be situated in a different geographical location, we might have been talking about a different polity.», «Secondly, the concept of institution, the heart and soul of this book, is poorly defined in this work. It is rather concentrated on what institutions could bring about for the prosperity of a nation.»

Chinedu Ifeakor, Gerry Ifeanyi Oginyi, PhD, Nnamdi Azikiwe University, Awka — https://www.nigerianjournalsonline.com/index.php/najp/article/download/535/526 — «One may ask what level of intellectual gutsy has Acemoglu and Robinson to have described these theories in such a derogative phrase – theories that don’t work?», «The thesis statement of the book is not only over ambitious but also faulty giving the above instance.», «It is self-evident that leaders who are smart, intelligent and knows technical know-how tends to perform creditably well when compared to those who are not educationally and technically advantaged. Many African nations are poor not simply because of the ignorance of her leaders though, but in most often cases are because of their ignorance as they do only not know, but doesn’t want to know», «There is no mono-factorial explanation of nations’ inequalities, and any attempt toward that would not only end in futility but will at the same time is the height of intellectual rascality.»

[REVIEW_SMASHER] Daviud Gallaguer ( https://chile.gob.cl/reino-unido/en/about-the-embassy/about-us/ambassador/embajador ) — https://scielo.conicyt.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0719-37692013000100009 — «Para rebatir teorías alternativas y defender la suya, Ace-moglu y Robinson aportan incontables «datos históricos». Estos los reúnen con el aplomo de científicos sociales que no se sienten limitados por las pedestres disciplinas del historiador.», «Los dos se parecen a aquellos novelistas o propagandistas que usan la historia como botín: los primeros como alimento al argumento de su ficción, donde por definición ignoran todo hecho que no les sea interesante; los segundos, para acumular evidencia para su tesis, donde por definición se descarta cualquier hecho que la incomode. Por ejemplo para comprobar que Colombia siempre ha sido un país de instituciones puramente extractivas, hacen un resumen grotesco y caricaturesco de la historia de ese país en muy pocas páginas. Otras veces, en sus arrebatos de entusiasmo, se tropiezan en forma más sutil. Por ejemplo hablan de «ley británica» cuando quieren decir «ley inglesa», y para rebatir la tesis de que es la cultura inglesa la que explica el éxito de países como Estados Unidos o Australia nos recuerdan que «Sierra Leona y Nigeria también fueron colonias inglesas». Cierto, pero entre los dos pares de países hay un abismo. La diferencia es que Estados Unidos y Australia fueron no solo gobernados, si no masivamente poblados por ingleses.», «Por eso mismo pasan por alto las reformas de un Pinochet en Chile, y como bien lo ha acotado Sachs4, no tienen una buena explicación para el rápido desarrollo que hubo bajo regímenes autoritarios en Asia.», «Y el impacto legítimamente propagandístico que ha tenido el libro desde su publicación se debe, probablemente, a que justamente atribuye el éxito de las naciones a un único factor.», «Si se detuvieran más en Chile, probablemente aprobarían su economía de mercado, porque la competencia es una condición sine que non de la inclusión. Pero criticarían nuestra excesiva desigualdad, y nuestro poco inclusivo sistema educacional, que hacen que la competencia se dé en una cancha desnivelada. Son demasiado pocos los talentos que logran florecer en Chile, y las elites por tanto han enfrentado poca competencia, fuera de la que ha venido de los inmigrantes. Tampoco es muy inclusivo nuestro sistema centralista de organización territorial, que tiene rezagadas a muchas regiones del país. Tal vez no sea casual que las protestas de estos últimos años vengan de los estudiantes y de las regiones.», «La fuerza y la insistencia con que Acemoglu y Robinson promueven su idea tienen, lo hemos dicho, atributos como de propaganda, pero eso ha sido el caso de muchos libros influyentes a través del tiempo. Académicamente habría sido más valioso un libro que mostrara la relativa importancia de instituciones inclusivas frente a otros factores. Por otro lado no hay mucho sobre cómo se gestan las instituciones inclusivas, por lo que países pobres no podrán aprender fácilmente de este libro. Pero la insistencia persuasiva con que está escrito hará que el libro tenga mucha influencia en los próximos años.»

Julio L. Arroyo Vozmediano, UNED — https://sci-hub.se/10.5944/etfiv.24.2011.11902 — «Sin lugar a dudas se trata de una de las obras más comentadas y de mayor éxito pu-blicadas en 2012.», «Sin embargo, en nuestra opinión, las argumentaciones basadas en nuestra ciencia adolecen en buena medida del riesgo de terminar edificando «lechos de Procusto», siempre que no se esté muy atento a la enorme densidad y compleji-dad del conocimiento histórico y a un principio que los historiadores tenemos perfectamente aprehendido: que la historia siempre se encuentra en construcción. Sin embargo, en nuestra opinión, las argumentaciones basadas en nuestra ciencia adolecen en buena medida del riesgo de terminar edificando «lechos de Procusto», siempre que no se esté muy atento a la enorme densidad y compleji-dad del conocimiento histórico y a un principio que los historiadores tenemos perfectamente aprehendido: que la historia siempre se encuentra en construcción.», «Sin embargo, el desarrollo de la expo-sición de la Inglaterra de Guillermo III es algo plana e incurre en afirmaciones —cuando menos— inexactas o discutibles, como cuando afirma que el Parla-mento y el nuevo rey negociaron una nueva constitución tras la Gloriosa que in-cluía la determinación de un nuevo orden sucesorio que se apartaba de los principios hereditarios», «Dada la centralidad que ocupa este momento histórico en el desarrollo argumental de los autores se echa de menos un mayor rigor en su tratamiento. Además, la teoría presentada, a nuestro juicio, no puede explicar algunos he-chos históricos obviados por los autores», «En cuanto a los factores tomados en cuenta en el texto para mostrar las simi-litudes y diferencias estructurales entre los dos Los Nogales echamos de menos unos aspectos —a nuestro juicio— fundamentales, si nos situamos en un plano de análisis económico. En primer lugar la población al norte de la valla tiene como moneda el dólar estadounidense lo que implica», «Por último, las diferencias entre los sistemas político-institucionales mejicano y estadounidense son el fruto de dos naciones que, tomadas en su totalidad, sí que responden a diferencias muy notables en clima, recursos económicos naturales u origen cultural.», «Según otra lectura, la diferencia también podría explicarse por su menor desarrollo de su estado de bienestar frente al canadiense (y, por ende, mucho mayor que el mejicano), pero seguramente esta elucidación nos podría hacer transitar por caminos menos gratos a la ortodoxia económica neoliberal y tampoco es el propósito de este texto el plantear un tesis alternativa, sino simplemente apuntar a que podrían existir otros análisis distintos del esgrimi-do por los autores.», «En cualquier caso y para terminar, el texto —por su repercusión y por su indu-dable interés a pesar de las discrepancias que puedan despertar sus conclusio-nes— resulta una de las publicaciones imprescindibles del año 2012 para los inte-resados en economía, historia o ciencia política.»

[BOOK_SERIES] Библиотека Сбербанка

[ADDITIONAL_READING] Mark Gradstein, Kai A. Konrad (edited by) — «Institutions and Norms in Economic Development»

Thomas W. Pogge — Politics as Usual. What Lies Behind the Pro-Poor Rhetoric

[NOTE_FULL_NAME] Аджемоглу Дарон, Робинсон Джеймс — Почему одни страны богатые, а другие бедные. Происхождение власти, процветания и нищеты (АСТ, 2015)

[NO_SCEDRECO] -->
1. Аджемоглу Дарон, Робинсон Джеймс — Почему одни страны богатые, а другие бедные (АСТ, 2015).pdf

<a id="Неолиберальные-мифы-об-экономическом-развитии"></a>
### Неолиберальные мифы об экономическом развитии

<!--- [BOOK_SCEDRECO] «Научный редактор» — Смирнова Арина. Нашёл только Смирнову Арину Арнольдовну; студентку по бакалаврской программе «Политология и мировая политика» — https://spb.hse.ru/ba/political/blackboard/300662744.html .

[POSITIVE_OR_NEUTRAL_REVIEW] Kam Hei Tsuei, City University of New York — https://sci-hub.se/10.1177/03063968090510010103 ; Alpar Lošonc, Faculty of Technical Sciences, Department for Social Sciences, Novi Sad, Serbia — https://scindeks-clanci.ceon.rs/data/pdf/1452-595X/2009/1452-595X0904535L.pdf ; Tim Koechlin, Director of the International Studies Program at Vassar College — https://sci-hub.se/10.1177/0486613410391410 ; Chola Mukanga, Zambian Economist — http://www.zambian-economist.com/2009/03/bad-samaritans-by-ha-joon-chang-review.html

[BOOK_OR_AUTHOR_OR_CONCEPT_CRITICISM] The Economist — https://www.economist.com/books-and-arts/2007/08/30/pistols-at-dawn -->
1. Чхан Ха Джун — Злые самаритяне. Миф о свободной торговле и секретная история капитализма (Манн, Иванов и Фербер, 2018).pdf

<a id="Теории-экономического-развития"></a>
### Теории экономического развития

<a id="HC-16"></a>
#### HC

<!--- [ACADEMIC_DEGREE] Peet, [Clark University, Graduate School of Geography, CV](https://www2.clarku.edu/departments/geography/cvs/PeetVitae2017.pdf) — «1958-1961 London School of Economics, B.Sc.(Economics) 1961», «1963—1967 University of California, Berkeley, Ph.D. 1968», «research interests — Critique of Neo-Liberal Development Theory; Globalization, Global Governance Institutions; Economic Policy, Financial Crisis; Geography of power; Global political ecology; Economic Policy in India; Global political ecology; Consciousness, rationality and ideology; semiotics; philosophy, theory, geographic thought»

Hartwick, согласно книге, «PhD, is Professor at Framingham State University, where she teaches courses in political, cultural, and regional geography and global development»

[AUTHOR_PROJECT] [Antipode: Radical Journal of Geography](https://antipodeonline.org/about-the-journal-and-foundation/a-radical-journal-of-geography/)

[CRIM_POSSIBLE_BIAS] Экономическое развитие Кубы и Венесуэлы представлено только в положительном ключе.

Из рецензии Alexandru Gavriş — «Thus, it can be noticed a much accentuated critics of certain theories, especially of those neo-liberal and the partisan position towards others. Moreover, on the trajectory of the book, the idea of the necessity of a best alternative is more and more argumentatively inserted (out of all the worst –an underlining omitted or un-evaluated from most of the studies)»

Из рецензии Glyn Williams — «The closing fifteen pages are indeed a tub-thumping call for action, which should make any student sit up and think critically about the need for development to be reinvented in the twenty-first century.»

[POSITIVE_OR_NEUTRAL_REVIEW] Manuela Epure, Spiru Haret University, Academy of Romanian Scientists, Romania, [Journal of Economic Development, Environment and People](http://ojs.spiruharet.ro/index.php/jedep/article/download/125/pdf_113) — «Authors’ work is considerable and the ways in which they extract what is relevant for each of the mainstream policies that derive from these development theories are extremely beneficial for readers being in their early stage professional career.»

Alexandru Gavriş, The Academy of Economic Studies from Bucharest, Bucharest, Romania, [Journal of Urban and Regional Analysis](https://www.jurareview.ro/resources/pdf/volume_3_issue_1_2011_reviews.pdf) — «They try to be impar-tial in the critical presentation of most of the theories, but they hit against what they under-lined in the beginning: development is “subject of the most intense manipulations», «Thus, it can be noticed a much accentuated critics of certain theories, especially of those neo-liberal and the partisan position towards others. Moreover, on the trajectory of the book, the idea of the necessity of a best alternative is more and more argumentatively inserted (out of all the worst –an underlining omitted or un-evaluated from most of the studies)», «Therefore, the open attitude and the limitation to the emergence of the paradigm in the occidental space facilitates the continuous discovery of the feelings of joy in reading the book with the purpose to understand the history of the concept of development, being stimulated by the critical perspective.», «Also, the reading pleasure would have been higher in the conditions of providing more dense information regarding the development of the Asian space», «Thus, the reading of „Theories of Development” becomes essential for anyone who wants to contribute to the improvement of life by the understanding of development and this way its good applying, one of the most widely used concepts, no matter the referential level»

[REVIEW_LONG] Mitsutoshi Ozawa, [Econometric Reviews](https://hosei.repo.nii.ac.jp/index.php?action=pages_view_main&active_action=repository_action_common_download&item_id=2693&item_no=1&attribute_id=22&file_no=1&page_id=13&block_id=83) — «なかにあって，本稿で取り上げるリチャード・ビートの単著『グローバル・キャピタリズム」は，｢社会発展の諸理論」という副題の通り，真正面から「グローバルな社会発展理論」を主題としてその本質的・根底的な把握を意図した希少かつ壮大な試みとして瞠目に値する», «まこと雄大な構想力に気圧される思いを禁じえない。マルクス主義の本質的属性を「総体性（Totalitat)」の認識のうちに求めたルカーチのひそみに倣えば，本書は正しくマルクス主義的である。そればかりではない。エンゲルスと共に，真のマルクス主義の核心を剰余価値論と史的唯物論とのうちに見いだそうとするのであれば，なおさらであろう。», «これが，極めて刺激的な本書から評者の学んだ教訓であり»

[REVIEW_ONE_PAGE] Keith Sutton, Department of Geography University of Manchester, [Journal of International Development](https://sci-hub.se/10.1002/jid.3380050411) — «This rather ‘tall order’ is not really achieved, as the incorporation of jargon and valid literature critiques required to meet the latter aim makes some sections rather demanding for the average student.», «A fault of Peet’s study, though, is to omit reference to the works of other non-Marxist geographers working on global capitalism in the Third World. The bibliography seems very selective in favour of Marxist geographers excluding reference, even critical, to recent books by Mabogunje, Dicken, Chisholm, Auty, Wallace, or even Stohr and Taylor’s appraisal of alternative ‘development from below’.», «Peet’s avowedly Marxist interpretation offers much of value to challenge and question conventional texts on development studies»

[REVIEW_ONE_PAGE] Blaut J. M., Department of Geography University of Illinois [Science and Society](https://sci-hub.se/10.2307/40404649) — «Here is another solid contribution from the pen of Richard Peet, one of the leaders in the radical geography movement», «The book does not really succeed at this task, mainly because Peet has not been willing to discard a number of essentially traditional theories of history, such as the notions of "Oriental Despotism" and "Asiatic Mode of Production" and the Anglocentric theory (fide Brenner) that capitalism was born in one unique and very small place, rural England, and was born in that place because of supposed cultural and political "blockages" in the rest of the world, including the rest of Europe. Yet no other book by a geographer has seriously taken on this immensely important task (and brought to bear on the problem the insights of this science).», «He does see that underdevelopment, not development, has been the lot of the extra-European world, and he does not neglect the important contributions of Samir Amin», «This is a fine contribution to radical geography, radical development theory, and radical political economy. It is less rewarding as a contribution to radical history»

[REVIEW_ONE_PAGE] Clarence Mondale, The George Washington University, [American Studies International](https://sci-hub.se/10.2307/41280303) — «The strengths of the Marxist tradition inform discussion: the centrality of ethics; the breadth of intellectual concern; and the determination to make theory contribute to generous social ends. The weaknesses that sometimes attend that tradition are also present. Much of the book has a quasi-scholastic quality as it threads its way through heresies in "left thought" in order to establish a correct Marxist doctrine.»

Lawrence Busch, [Research in the History of Economic Thought and Methodology](https://sci-hub.se/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0743-4154(02)20034-6) — «What they show is the complexity anddiversity of the vast literature and practice as well as its parochial character.», «This reader was somewhat frustrated by the rather truncated conclusion.»

[BOOK_OR_AUTHOR_OR_CONCEPT_CRITICISM] Deirdre Duffy, School of Politics and International Relations, University of Nottingham, UK, [International Planning Studies](https://sci-hub.se/10.1080/13563475.2010.490669) — «However, although providing brief and broad-brush descriptions for new students, ratherthan experienced researchers, are centralto Peet and Hartwick’s work, in favouring this approach the volume sacrifices some of the depth and accuracy needed for a comprehensive understanding of the complex-ities of this field», «Land tenancy and feudalism is sustained by these elites as a meansto free up time to do this. Here Peet and Hardwick fail to ask who these elites were and,other than a passing reference to historical narratives of feudal ownership, why they sawtheir role in this way. While given that their aim is to provide an introduction to the uninitiated student of economic theories of development, the authors could be somewhatforgiven for being facetious, such a statement is also doubly damaging in light of this aim.», «The assumption here is that the existing socialstructure of ruling elites who owned everything and those who worked for them couldchange if the economic system changed from historical feudalism to industrialization. Essentially, in failing to unpick the dynamics of the relationship between elites andsubordinate classes, Peet and Hartwick partly prohibit their work from engaging inthis debate fully.», «Another problem with this volume’s approach to introducing all theoretical debatesfalling under developmental studies is the fact that such an approach lends itself moretowards grouping similar debates together rather than connecting debates together comple-tely so that each argument is followed by its counterargument.», «Notwithstanding these criticisms, if their aim was produce a robust outline of the keydebates within the field of development studies then Peet and Hartwick have achievedthis aim and for this they should be praised. On the other hand, there are a number ofproblems with the volume that cannot be ignored. In attempting to cover every debatesince the era of ‘classical economics’, one gets the feeling that some of the critique and academic rigour has been forsaken in favour of presenting an easily digestible, sequential narrative of the evolution of this field.», «While this book would be beneficial for undergraduate students of development studies or those new to this area, readers looking for more depth and critical analysis would do better to look further afield.»

[REVIEW_SMASHER] Glyn Williams, Department of Earth Sciences and Geography, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire, UK, [Annals of the Association of American Geographers](https://sci-hub.se/https://www.jstor.org/stable/1515430) — «Given the chapter's scope, it is inevitable that none of these areas is covered in depth, but this brevity also makes some of the authors' criticisms that conclude the chapter seem less convincing.», «However, as the chapter has presented a brief history of economic ideas rather than tracing the institutional development of the discipline, this critique raises more questions than it answers.», «As would be expected from their introduction, the authors are more inclined to be generous here than in their dismissal of neoclassical economies: criticisms that Marxism is teleological and functionalist are myths, they argue, that belie the empirical richness of Marxist work. Even dependency theory is pardoned for its corruption of Marx because it "made us see the world from the perspectives of oppressed peoples living in its 'distant' corners" (p. 122).», «Whereas the latter claim is somewhat dubious (how visible is the inequity of international trade vis-a-vis other forms of oppression for scheduled caste laborers in India?), the former was crying out for the authors to provide some practical examples a point I shall return to below.», «As such, I have no criticisms of Peet and Hartwick's intended destination: it is the writing strategies they have used to get there and the debates they have bypassed en route that give me cause for concern.», «There is undoubted value in providing a history of development theory, but here the roots are traced back a long way through so many schools of thought that the book is in danger of becoming "a brief history of everything." As such, despite the authors' efforts, it risks being both impenetrable for undergraduates at earlier stages», «Here their failure to work through theory's relationship to practice is perhaps the most serious omission.», «In this volume, "better theory" emerges as the only place from which to criticize past theoretical mistakes, in a series of debates that touch base with the outside world surprisingly rarely.», «Unfortunately, by presenting development theory as a history of ideas divorced from practice, their book has missed a vital opportunity to explore in depth what the possibilities and problems of "doing some? thing" might be.»

[REVIEW_SMASHER] Donald Von Eshen, McGill University, [Canadian Journal of Sociology/Cahiers canadiens de sociologie](https://sci-hub.se/https://www.jstor.org/stable/3341685) — «Development theorizing "on the left" is in a sorry state. The value of this book is that it reveals this clearly», «At the same time, the book is itself an illustration of the increasing irrelevance of the left», «Finally, while I recommend the book for its highly useful review of postdevelopmentalist and feminist theories, and as an illustration of the situation in which the left now finds itself, the reader should be warned that the chapters are, generally, too short given the range of authors dealt with, and the insistence of the authors on dealing with the basic theoretical underpinnings of the different schoolsto present fully comprehensible accounts of the ideas being examined.», «t also ignores, in its reviews, some important perspectives: for instance, state centric theory which is currently so important in political science and sociology. And finally, evidence is practically never discussed in the work. The presentation is largely at the level of theory only.», «The authors appear to be more comfortable with a clearly demarcated boundary between modernism(s) and postmodernism(s), policed by a kind of categorical violence and dismissal policy that, in the end, mars the book and diminishes the force and importance of the book's prescriptions», «mittedly ferocious encounters!)" (p. 155). Many of these ad hominem arguments ought to have been removed by Guilford editors. Had they done so, the arguments would have been stronger and the book better.», «Instead, the authors adopt a binary reading of development and Enlightenment, asserting the beneficial products of the Enlightenment over the negative effects, choosing good progress over bad progress, without critically engaging with the ways», «I read this book (the third time) while also reading Peter Uwe Hohendahl's Prismatic Thought: Theodor W. Adorno (Univ. of Nebraska Press, 1995). The contrast was stark. Whereas the authors of TD strive for clear and fixed lines of demarcation between theoretical traditions, with all the conceptual soldiers lined up to do determinate political or practical work, Hohendahl works hard to free Adorno from his critics and pundits, in order to keep open the ambiguities, ambivalences, and the material embeddedness of his works and their reception in specific social and cultural formations», «However, whether poststructuralism, postcolonialism, and postdevelopmentalism can be closed off as easily as the authors of TD might wish, or even whether they represent the enemy in this regard, seems to me at least an open question.», «Theories of Development usefully engages the reader with these problematics, but its arguments for and commitment to a particular form of critical modernism too often close off, rather than open up, the discussion of humane possible futures for marginalized peoples.»

[REVIEW_SMASHER] John Pickles, University of Kentucky, [Economic Geography](https://sci-hub.se/https://doi.org/10.2307/3594107) — «Overall, the book is a useful summary of the diversity of intellectual positions that have emerged in development theory in recent years», «The chapter begins with some rather odd introductory comments on materialism's understanding that "human rationality is the mental result of the working of the brain, and the brain is conceived as originating purely through evolution as a natural organ" (p. 92) and that "consciousness in a materialist understanding comes from real experience in a material world that precedes thought" (p. 92). And it follows these statements with an oddly mechanical reading of Marx.», «The result is a strangely anachronistic and perhaps intentional ambivalence in a contemporary text on development theory, in which the authors seem to be defending "key Western notions of progress and development" against poststructural and antiEurocentric criticisms (p. 137).», «its partisan nature is both its strength and weakness», «At times the arguments seem overly focused on "theory-effects" independent of the concrete regions, conditions, and institutions within which they were produced», «The text itself seems surprisingly unconcerned with transformations in the university, in U.S. and European overseas policies, or with the institutionalization of development as a field of action. Indeed, little or no attention is paid to the debates over development studies, area studies, international studies, and global studies within which "theories of development" have been produced, reproduced, and circulated.», «TD exhibits a surprising lack of concern with geographic thought and writings.», « Similarly, although I was a little surprised to find that Wallerstein is represented by references to only two works, Wolpe's interventions in development theory (particularly his arguments about the articulation of modes of production in development studies) are overlooked, and Michael Burawoy is missing entirely. Geographers writing on development, modernity, and postcolonial worlds, such as Doreen Massey, Michael Watts, David Harvey, Neil Smith, and David Slater, are either totally absent or only marginally discussed in the text. Michael Watts, for example, is represented only by reference to Silent Violence, despite his many, serious subsequent interventions in development theory», «Similarly, the absence of Doreen Massey's work must strike geographic readers of development as a serious oversight. More generally, surprisingly little attention is given to areas of intense debate about development theory in fields such as peasant studies, industrial geography, orgiven the enormous scope of the latest development project of building capitalism out of state socialism», «Absent is any discussion of what David Kaplan has recently called "the Althusserian legacy" and the ways in which thinkers we now associate with poststructuralism-far from merely sitting around chatting in coffee bars (as the authors claim)», «Even the discussion of Marxism and neo-Marxism (…) is surprisingly lacking in attention to the kinds of vigorous disagreements within Marxist thought over postmodernism, poststructuralism, postcolonial, and postdevelopment thought.», «In this binary and at times thoroughly mechanical logic, there is little or no room for the Marxist Guatari, the Foucault of Marx and critical theory, the Adorno and Horkheimer»

Neha Hui, Tata Institute of Social Science, [Canadian Geographer/Le Géographe canadien](https://sci-hub.se/https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1541-0064.2011.00370.X) — «Their criticism of Ricardo and the idea of “free trade” does not, however, seem to be informed by Ricardian theory critiques that have been developed by Marxist economists from the erstwhilecolonized countries, such as Utsa Patnaik.», «It is unfortunately too heavy with jargon, yet not deep enough for someone alreadyconversant with the ideas. There is no discus-sion of the limitations of Marxism that feminist and third world scholars have pointed out; that strictly “class” based analysis leaves out other exploitative categories such as gender, race, or caste.», «There remains, however, tentativeness in thesefeminist writings such that the knowledge produced is fragmented and inconclusive.», «Two concerns creep out of this statement. Firstly, there seems to be a very lim-ited, and apparently western, understanding ofwhat “rational scientific attitude” might be.», «slightly fatuous claim the authors are making here is that the alternative schools do not have arational and scientific attitude. Having made this assertion, the authors seem to associate themselves with the same sort of modernist elitism that they had sought to critique in the course of their book.», «The second concern is with thereliance on “evidential truth” for the claim ofbeing scientific. The problem is not in the ideaof evidenceper se,butmoreinwhoseevidencewe put our faith in? Even when we vow to hearthe views of the “oppressed people,” as Peet andHartwick demand, when viewed from their chap-ter on critical modernism, this evidence wouldstill remain contested.», «The authors have admirably put a lot of ef-fort into questioning the existing developmentparadigms; however, they have not spent enoughtime providing justification for their proposed answer.»

Ronald J. Horvath, University of Sydney, [Progress in Human Geography](https://sci-hub.se/10.1177/030913259201600341) — «and it as such be-longs to a genre of books by geographers con-cerned to provide a critical exegesis of theories ofdevelopment, e.g., Brookfield (1975), Gore(1984) and Corbridge (1986)», «The inclusion of this materialis necessary for a book intended to be an under-graduate text in development theory.», «While conceding that some progress canbe seen, this progress is far too limited to a fewcountries to suggest that the sceptical claims ofdependency and Marxist theory have been dis-proved for Peet.», «Whereas Peet uses structuralMarxism as his preferred lens through which toview the history of society in general and capi-talism in particular, for the ’solutions’ to theproblems thrown up by capitalism he turns towhat the cofounders of Marxism termed ’Uto-pian socialism’.», «From the late 1980s onwards, a struc-tural Marxist account of societal developmentmust answer substantial criticisms being made bypost-Marxists more convincingly than Peet doesin this volume. And the meaning of the crisis inthe second world cannot be ignored in a contem-porary Marxist theory of societal developmentbecause we are not likely to see another major social experiment involving development ’outsideof capitalism’ in the twentieth century that isinpsired by the kind of theory summarized in this book.»

Terry McGee, University of British Columbia, [Economic Geography](https://sci-hub.se/10.2307/144204) — «Peet feels, with justification, that the study of development has lost this concern with poverty and along with it the informing vision of radical theories that provide insightful explanatory frameworks for explaining unequal development.», «Much of this discussion is at such a level of generality that if historians get loose on it, Peet had better build a large stone wall around himself to avoid their poisoned arrows. For example, Peet could have been much stronger on the shape of the world system in the thirteenth and fourteenth centuries had he referred to Janet Abu-Lughod's important work.», «But the suggested alternative involving an "industrialization process that has to be collectively owned and democratically organized by the workers involved before it can transform their existence" (p. 170) at a time of the collapse of socialist systems is utopian in the extreme.», «I must admit to a weariness with the debates over the mode of production. From my perspective, they are best suited to the coffeeshops of Paris. Peet is not prepared to move these sorts of assertions into the realm of reality. The failure of many Third World countries to industrialize is, in many cases, due to the greed and inefficiency of those countries' elites, who enter into liaisons with international companies to "rip off" their countries.», «We have to thank Dick Peet for reminding us of the radical vision. It is helpful to counteract the euphoria of developmentalists. But it does not resolve the crisis of development theory. Nor, unfortunately, does it provide the answer to the persistence of poverty on a global scale. To answer these questions, we need new, radical theory and perspectives.»

[REVIEW_SMASHER] Stuart Corbridge, [Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers](https://sci-hub.se/https://www.jstor.org/stable/622714) — «Peet's geography is a geography which is bound up with the idea of a struggle for a better world, but which has little to say about the forms and dynamics of particular struggles, or about the institutions and practices in and through which this better world might be constructed. It is a geography in which exhortation and wishful thinking substitute for explanation and the posing of meaningful questions.», «The problem is that these arguments are no more than imprecations, a point I will return to.», «Although the reader will not find in Global Capitalism anything of substance which is not already in the work of Brewer and Szentes, Chilcote and Blomstr6m and Hettne (from all of whom Peet borrows liberally), he or she may find the directness of Peet's prose engaging», «This brief encomium, however, cannot disguise the fact that Peet's book is dismal fare. The level of scholarship is poor, with the author resorting frequently to non-sequiturs and to what I will call the ubiquity of capitalism thesis (the two being related). The book also parades a form of theoretical and political finalism which is not argued for, but which is supported rather by an abusive misreading of the works of others and by a repeated harping on the dark side of capitalism (a point noted previously by Michael Storper).», «Booth, Lipietz and myself are accused of assuming, 'that industrialization is automatically progressive, inherently constituting development, and that dependency theory cannot encompass Third World industrial development' (p. 169). With the exception of the word 'encompass' this is nonsense, but it is irritating nonsense nonetheless», «His reply was billed as the 'confessions of an unrepentant Marxist'.», « Far more disquieting is the manner in which Peet seeks to present his central arguments.», «to denounce those who would challenge his views by condemning them or their works as ideologues, or post-structuralists, or simply as bizarre.», «The first and second of these assumptions constitute the ubiquity principle and they lead to a series of suppressions and non-sequiturs in Peet's work. This is particularly evident in Peet's reading of capitalism and colonialism in British India. (…) If Peet had any sort of feel for modem Indian historiography he would know that most scholars are sceptical of a tightly drawn pre-colonial/colonial divide and that most are sceptical of the claim that newly enforced trading relations caused the de-industrialization of a fast-developing subcontinent», « Peet's argument works only to the extent that other voices are denied, to the extent that practical debates», «Peet also fails to notice that some of the ills he detects in capitalist industrialization might also be reproduced under socialist strategies of modernization. If only Peet would accept that all development processes involve trade-offs the dilemmas of development signalled by John Toye he might begin to shape his critique of capitalism-in-general to a more useful critique of particular forms of capitalist production and exchange, and their conditions of existence and effects», «Such a thought brings me to the other main area of Peet's work to which I take exception: his holier-than-thou attitude to 'science' and politics.», «capitalist development which starves people in Africa [including the socialist countries?]», «The tenor of Peet's denunciations of what he calls anti-structuralist arguments (his complete failure to engage with the arguments of others and, indeed, with the complexity and contradictions of the modem world) is almost too depressing for words», «Doesn't Peet realize that it is because real societies have been constructed in the image of dangerous abstractions (be it utopian socialism, autarky or the perfect market) that some of us would want to resist the command to write politically in the sense of writing falsely for a pre-given end?», «Let me conclude by saying that Peet is his own worst enemy.», «This is not the case, as the more reasoned work of Meiksins Wood and Harvey and Elliott makes clear, but it is a conclusion to which the reader will be driven by the absence of proper argumentation in Peet's work. Global Capitalism is the sort of text which made necessary a critique of 'structural' Marxism in the first place.»

Iain Wallace, Carleton University, Ottawa, [Cahiers de géographie du Québec](https://www.erudit.org/fr/revues/cgq/1992-v36-n99-cgq2671/022299ar.pdf) — «Peet accepts (p. 145) the accuracy of the dependency school thesis of the development of underdevelopment yet, three pages later, he embraces Warren's analysis of the progressive character of capitalism industrialization, only to dismiss it as an "optimistic generalization" on page 158!», «Students will gain n° clearer sensé of Peet's preferred development strategy from his synopsis of Thomas (1974), which better exemplifies a vacuously idealist than a materialist structural marxism.», «Much of his argument, however, is shaped by a domestic marxian squabble with Hindess and Hirst which, however justifiable, is totally counterproductive in this context if Global Capitalism is really intended as an introductory textbook», «This is all very laudable, but it is not intellectually cohérent!»

[REVIEW_ANSWER] Peet, [Cahiers de géographie du Québec](https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/59288194.pdf) — «My contention, in reply, is that Wallace's review is the exact reverse to those cannons of good reviewing mentioned above, being an example of a reviewer quickly glancing at a book, reinforcing conclusions already formed, confirming his own political prejudices, and thus doing a disservice to the author of the book, the readers of this journal, and the editors who trusted him to provide an accurate, insightful critique of the work.», «Wallace may disagree with the way Thomas argues his case, or with his position as a whole, that is his prérogative, but the extremely négative charge that it is "vacuous" (i.e. empty, unintelligent and entirely devoid of worth) extends beyond Thomas (one of the better argued versions) to ail similar efforts by dominated peoples to gain control over the basic structures of their existence.», «conservative politics account for Wallace's intellectually incompétent review», «But my book does not "embrace" the Warren thesis, if by that slippery term is meant 'accepting eagerly, with affection', it merely summarizes (on p. 148) the Warren argument without comment, a procédure followed throughout the work», «Again, the "inconsistency" of my argument is fabricated by Wallace through a "summary" which simplifies/distorts my argument in a direction the reviewer has previously decided it probably goes (i.e. naive altruism).», «This counter-critique could be extended to virtually every sentence in Wallace's review, but thèse two examples should indicate the overall pattern. Essentially I am complaining that my book is criticized for positions which it does not take, positions indeed which are the reverse of the book's intent.»

Bue Nielsen, National Agency for Physical Planning Copenhagen, [Geografiska Annaler. Series B, Human Geography](https://sci-hub.se/https://doi.org/10.2307/490466) — «Peet provides us with a brilliant outline of the mentioned theories. The strong points and weaknesses of modernization theory are carefully described. The great historical achievements of dependency theory despite its fallacies and underestimation of internal class conflicts are recognized», «But his description seems to be too short and haphazard to underpin his claim that structural Marxism can be furthered by partial synthesis with Anglo-saxon feminist theories.», «The reader looks in vain for Marxist criticism of structural Marxism in the book. It is regrettable because the tendency in structural Marxism to explain development in non-capitalistic societies directly from ideology or politics (the super-structure in Marxist terms) and not from forces and relations of production (the basis) has met with harsh critique», «The criticism is easily rejected taking into account that post-modernists often are blissfully ignorant of history.», «It reflects a general weakness in the book. Peet is not a master of dialectics», «For instance, though the contradiction between man and nature is unwittingly ranked as important for societal development as contradictions between opposing classes, Peet gives no clear picture of the role of nature in societal development», «These critical remarks should not overshadow the overall impression that Peet gives us deep insights into the development of global capitalism and suggestive accounts of neo-marxist literature on development, showing the strength of a holistic philosophy.»

[REVIEW_NO_ACCESS] Sukumar Ganapati, [Journal of the American Planning Association](https://search.proquest.com/openview/373bbc5b3264beb8a81dc9e6db43f1d8)

[ADDITIONAL_READING] Sharad Chari, Stuart Corbridge (by editing) — «The Development Reader»

Cathrine Brun, Piers Blaikie — «Alternative Development: Unravelling Marginalization, Voicing Change»

Richard Peet — «Radical geography: Alternative viewpoints on contemporary social issues»

Madhu Suri Prakash, Gustavo Esteva — «Escaping education: living as learning within grassroots cultures»

Denis Wood, John Fels — «The Natures of Maps: Cartographic Constructions of the Natural World»

David Mclellan — «Marxism after Marx»

Tony Brewer — «Marxist Theories Of Imperialism: A Critical Survey»

William I. Robinson — «Global Capitalism and the Crisis of Humanity»

Kate Willis — «Theories and Practices of Development»

Paul Ormerod — «The Death of Economics»

[NO_SCEDRECO] -->
1. Peet Richard, Hartwick Elaine — Theories of Development꞉ Contentions, Arguments, Alternatives (The Guilford Press, 2015).pdf

<a id="Альтернативные-теории-экономического-развития"></a>
#### Альтернативные теории экономического развития

<!--- [Kr/MCol][Ti/MCol]

[ACADEMIC_DEGREE] [Eesti Teadusinfosüsteem, CV](https://www.etis.ee/CV/Erik_Reinert/eng) — «1977–1980 Cornell University, Ithaca, N.Y., USA, Phd in economics»

[ACADEMIC_DEGREE_EDITORS] Ghosh — [Jawaharlal Nehru University, CV](https://www.jnu.ac.in/Faculty/jayati/CV.pdf) — «Ph. D. (Economics), University of Cambridge, England, 1983.»

Kattel — [Eesti Teadusinfosüsteem, CV](https://www.etis.ee/CV/Rainer_Kattel/eng) — «Rainer Kattel, Doctor's Degree, 2001, (sup) Wolfgang Johannes Max Drechsler, The Constitution of the Polis, University of Tartu, Faculty of Social Sciences and Education, Institute of Government and Politics, Chair of Public Administration.»

[ACADEMIC_DEGREE] Остальные помимо нижеперечисленных — профессора. Как видно из списка ниже, немногие из числа авторов не имели степени PhD на момент написания книги

Arno Mong Daastøl — [Personal site CV](http://arno.daastol.com/cv.html) — «2000—11, PhD (Dr. rer .pol.); Dissertation — Friedrich List's Heart, Wit and Will: Mental Capital as the Productive Force of Progress»

Jacob P. Hochard — согласно книге — economics PhD candidate at the University of Wyoming, USA

Ali Kadri — [National University of Singapore](https://rc4.nus.edu.sg/fellows/ali-kadri/) — «Dr. Ali Kadri was a Senior Research Fellow at the Middle East Institute, National University of Singapore»

Sam Moyo — [Rhodes University](https://www.ru.ac.za/sociology/research/unitofzimbabweanstudies/people/professorsammoyo/) — «has a PhD in Rural Development and Environmental Management from the University of Northumbria, United Kingdom.»

Philipp Roessner — [University of Manchester](https://www.research.manchester.ac.uk/portal/philipp.roessner.html) — «I hold two Ph.D.s, one being in Economic History (Ph.D., University of Edinburgh / UK, 2007): for a thesis on Scottish overseas trade in the eighteenth century); the other being a higher doctorate (common across continental Europe, antiquated and comparable to what you may call D.Litt) in Social and Economic History (Dr. phil. habil., 2011) awarded for a thesis on "Deflation Devaluation Rebellion" from the Universität Leipzig in 2011.»

Andrea Satelli — [Personal site CV](http://www.andreasaltelli.eu/file/repository/SALTELLI_2014_Rev2.pdf) — «1976 — Doctor (Italian) degree Cum Laude in Inorganic Chemistry from the Rome University (Italy), first of his cohort.»

Mehdi Shafaeddin — [ResearchGate](https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Mehdi-Shafaeddin) — «D.Phil in economic development, OXON»

Antonio Carlos Macedo e Silva — [CNPq](http://lattes.cnpq.br/3897158455969577) — «e doutorado em Ciência Econômica pela Universidade Estadual de Campinas (1994). Realizou estágio de pós-doutorado na Université de Paris em 1997-1998.»

Ajit Singh — [The Indian Express (media)](https://indianexpress.com/article/opinion/columns/ajit-singh-the-man-from-cambridge/) — «He later went to the University of California, Berkeley, where I first met him in 1963, for his PhD»

Yash Tandon — [New Vision](https://archives.visiongroup.co.ug/vision/NewVisionaApi/v1/uploads/NV030412pg50.pdf) — «Then he completed his PhD in international relations from the same institution in 1969.»

Elizabeth Thurbon — [UNSW Sydney, Arts, Design & Architecture](https://www.arts.unsw.edu.au/our-people/elizabeth-thurbon) — «Elizabeth holds a Ph.D. in Government (International Political Economy) from the University of Sydney.»

Hüseyin Safa Ünal — согласно книге — «PhD student in economics at University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA»

Ting Xu — [University of Sheffield](https://www.sheffield.ac.uk/law/people/law-academic-staff/ting-xu) — «PhD from the London School of Economics»

Xuan Zhao — [TalTech, 2016 Master’s Thesis](https://digikogu.taltech.ee/et/Download/1d469ac0-81fb-4ab3-bb5a-3c46735120d3)

[AUTHORS_PROJECT] [Globelics](https://www.globelics.org/) — «A worldwide, open and diverse community of scholars working on innovation and competence building in the context of economic development.»

[POSITIVE_OR_NEUTRAL_REVIEW] Tony Jackson, University of Dundee, UK, [Local Economy](https://sci-hub.se/10.1177/0269094217720739) — «Evidence of the growth potential inherent in the develop-mental-state model provides the firmest argument in support of Reinert’s thesis. The initial section of the handbook has few such gems and could easily be omitted without sacrificing the basic arguments on which this volume rests. There are some banal offerings in the other two sections as well.», «Despite such blind alleys, this collection stillprovides some useful insights into the realityof development processes for practitioners inlocal development. This is particularly thecase for those contributions which explorealternatives to static neo-classical growthpolicies, and summarise recent advances indevelopment practice stemming from theanalysis of dynamic processes inherent inthe works of ‘classical’ authors such asHirschman and Schumpeter.»

Alexandru Gavriș, Bucharest Academy of Economic Studies, Romania, [Journal of Urban and Regional Analysis](https://www.jurareview.ro/resources/pdf/volume_9_issue_2_2017_reviews.pdf) — «Moreover, the collection comprises somehow neglected economists who not only influenced the field, but laid foundations of a better understanding of structural transformations when criticism and theoretical context are well connected. Overall, the handbook tries to catch as much as it can from what it is considered to be a suppressed angle of economic development», «I do not want to be misunderstood as the essays do not fit — they are amazing to me, but I would have enjoyed an introduction before each of the three sections connecting the main ideas of the respective parts. The structure could have been improved with a different sectioning maybe. Moreover, there are some inconsistencies with the length of certain issues. Some papers over-detail, while others limit themselves to highlighting only a few points that otherwise could have been extended in order to clarify the issues they embarked on.»

[REVIEW_SELF-PUBLISHING] Ingrid Harvold Kvangraven, PhD student in Economics at The New School — [Developing Economics blog](https://developingeconomics.org/2017/01/29/what-can-we-learn-from-alternative-theories-of-economic-development/) — «impressive Handbook of Alternative Theories of Economic Development that can help make sense of what’s going on», «This book will be interesting for anyone seeking to expand and deepen their understanding of economic development beyond what is taught in mainstream courses.»

[REVIEW_RETELLING] Reinhart Kößler, [Peripherie — Politik, Ökonomie, Kultur](https://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/bitstream/handle/document/59129/ssoar-peripheriepoek-2018-2-rez-koler.pdf) — «Als wichtiges Beispiel dafür führen sie Zimbabwe an, wo die „radikale Landreform“ die Machtbalance verändert und die Souveränität gestärkt habe (498). Generell erscheint den Autoren in Zeiten der „Endkrise des Monopol-kapitalismus“ eine „Rückkehr aufs Land“ nicht unrealistisch (499).», «Solche Einsichten fehlen wiederum in Mehdi Shafaeddins Überlegungen zur Wettbewerbsfähigkeit, die an Schumpeter anknüpfen und deren Bezugsgrößen einerseits Firmen (einschließlich transnationale Konzerne) und andererseits Staaten sind.», «Insgesamt bleibt die „alternative“ Perspektive in diesem durchaus instruktiven und mit großem Gewinn zu lesenden Band letztlich weit vor zwei entscheidenden Schritten stehen: vor der Überwindung des fast durchgängigen methodologischen Nationalismus – der unbestreitbar auch in die Realität und nicht zuletzt in die Daten eingeschrieben ist, mit denen wir es zu tun haben – und wohl untrennbar davon vor der Verabschiedung eines Redens von „Entwicklung“, das ein Ziel immer schon zu kennen glaubt, sich letztlich aber als problematische Chimäre erweist.»

Romana Brait, [Jahrgang](https://emedien.arbeiterkammer.at/viewer/rest/pdf/mets/AC08890876_2018_2.xml/LOG_0046/Entwicklungskonomie_abseits_des_Mainstreams.pdf) — «Die HerausgeberInnen weisen auchdarauf hin, welche Aspekte im Hand-buch nicht mehr abgedeckt werdenkonnten: Zu Demografie, Bevölke-rungsdichte und damit in Verbindungstehenden Fragen wie der zunehmen-den Verstädterung wurde kein eigenesKapitel hinzugefügt. Die anthropologi-sche Perspektive, wie etwa Karl Pola-nyis „Fiktive Waren“, hat keinen eige-nen Beitrag. Gleiches gilt für NicholasKaldors Theorie zur Rolle des Staatesfür die Förderung ökonomischer Ent-wicklung. Auch zu Thorstein Veblensökonomischer Denktradition gibt eskeinen Beitrag.», «Wenngleich im vorliegenden Buchnicht alle Perspektiven berücksichtigtwerden konnten, wurde dennoch einumfangreiches und überzeugendesSammelwerk vorgelegt, in dem jeden-falls breite Teile der heterodoxen Öko-nomie abgedeckt werden und einigeZugänge aus der nicht-westlichen Weltvorgestellt werden.»

[ADDITIONAL_READING] Mark Setterfield — «Handbook of Alternative Theories of Economic Growth»

Джон Перкинс — «Исповедь экономического убийцы»

Jonathan Aldred — «Licence to be Bad: How Economics Corrupted Us»

Жан Тироль — «Экономика для общего блага»

Пол Ромер — «Высшая макроэкономика»

[NOTE_FULL_NAME] Reinert Erik S., Ghosh Jayati, Kattel Rainer (eds.) — Handbook of Alternative Theories of Economic Development (Edward Edgar, 2016)

-->
1. Reinert Erik et al. (eds.) — Handbook of Alternative Theories of Economic Development (Edward Edgar, 2016).pdf

<a id="Формализация-прав-собственности-в-развивающихся-странах"></a>
### Формализация прав собственности в развивающихся странах

<a id="HC-17"></a>
#### HC

<!--- [NO_ACADEMIC_DEGREE] «in 1967, a master's in international law and economics from Geneva's Institut Universitaire des Hautes Etudes Internationales» — https://www.nytimes.com/1987/02/22/magazine/in-defense-of-the-black-market.html — я не нашёл сведений, что он имеет учёное звание; также не нашёл, что он имеет профессорскую кафедру где-либо

[PROFESSIONAL_DEGREE] «De Soto has also served as an economist for the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, president of the Executive Committee of the Copper Exporting Countries Organization (CIPEC), CEO of Universal Engineering and governor of Peru's Central Reserve Bank.» — https://archive.is/20130410235433/http://www.forbes.com/2009/11/10/de-soto-hernando-opinions-business-visionaries-bio.html . Полагаю, хватит.

[AUTHOR_PROJECT] Institute Libertad y Democracia — https://www.ild.org.pe/

[BOOK_OR_AUTHOR_OR_CONCEPT_CRITICISM][REVIEW_LONG][REVIEW_META] Paul van der Molen, former director of Kadaster International — https://www.fig.net/resources/proceedings/fig_proceedings/fig2012/papers/ts07b/TS07B_vandermolen_5503.pdf — «Especially the academia sought publicity to render scientific evidence that de Soto’s solution will not work, such as 'de Soto's solution not for South Africa' (B. Cousins), ‘The De Soto Delusion’ (Gravois) or 'The wrong prescription for the wrong malady' (Bromley) to name a few.», «1. The experiences so far.De Soto neglects that experiences from the past demonstrate that titling does not work. // 2. Customary practices (legal pluralism).De Soto neglects the role of customary tenure and management as existing legal institutions, although not under the formal ‘bell jar’. // 3. Land distribution De Soto neglects the skew access to land in many countries. // 4. CodificationDe Soto neglects that formalizing is not a simple confirmation of informal rules. It legalizes thievery, dispossession and colonial grabbing and neglects the gender issue. // 5. Role of the State and the rule of lawDe Soto relies on political will and functional governments, while current statutory legal frameworks exclude the poor and lack of enforcement hampers providing protection. // 6. The poor De Soto neglects that the ‘poor’ are not an homogenous group (there are ‘rich’ poor, and ‘’poor’ poor) so that single solutions will not work.», «Furthermore, there are two more issues, when it comes to the evidence base. The first is, that in general most reviewers reproach de Soto of not providing any evidence for his statements», «And the second is: how did it work out in the projects in Peru, in which de Soto was involved, himself. Do they provide evidence of the chain title-credit-income? The answer is ‘hardly’ or even ‘no’»

El Comercio, «El Indecopi resolvió sancionarlo con S/.10.950 por no incluir en un mandato anterior los nombres de Mario Ghibellini y Enrique Ghersi en el libro "El Otro Sendero"» — https://elcomercio.pe/economia/peru/sancionan-hernando-soto-violacion-propiedad-intelectual-noticia-1368239/

[CRIM] В Википедии собраны только хвалебные мнения — https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hernando_de_Soto_(economista)

[NOTE_FULL_NAME] де Сото Эрнандо — Загадка капитала. Почему капитализм торжествует на Западе и терпит поражение во всем остальном мире (Олимп-Бизнес, 2004)

[NO_PDF][NO_SCEDRECO] -->
1. [де Сото Эрнандо](https://www.cato.org/friedman-prize/hernando-desoto/biography) — Загадка капитала (Олимп-Бизнес, 2004).doc

<a id="Эмуляция"></a>
### Эмуляция

<!--- [ACADEMIC_DEGREE] PhD in economics, Cornell University — https://ec.europa.eu/jrc/sites/jrcsh/files/CV-Reinert.pdf#page=2 .

[ACADEMIC_DEGREE_EDITOR] Владимир Сергеевич Автономов — член-корреспондент РАН, доктор экономических наук, профессор — https://www.imemo.ru/about/persons/department/full?id=25

[AUTHOR_PROJECT] The Other Canon «the study of the economy as a real object, not defined in terms of the adoption of core assumptions and techniques», http://othercanon.org/ .

[POSITIVE_OR_NEUTRAL_REVIEW][REVIEW_SAYS_LITTLE]

Lansana Keita, University of The Gambia — https://sci-hub.se/https://www.ajol.info/index.php/ad/article/download/63536/51381 — «Other researchers inthe same vein are Ha-Joon Chang, K.S. Jomo, and increasingly the prominenteconomist, Joseph Stiglitz. His text Globalisation and its Discontents (2002) has been well received internationally» — вообще-то разгромной критике Стиглица подвергли, «Reinert’s key idea is that there is a serious disjunction between therecommendations that are offered to developing nations by development officials from the industrialized world and the policies adopted by such nationswhen they themselves were on the path towards development.», «Thus, one must take issue with Reinert’s idea that unlessthere is a simultaneous promise of industrialisation, the decision to invest inhuman capital could be a foolhardy one.», «What is also missing from Reinert’s analysis is how nations that are on the path of economic development would gain ready access to developmental capital without the constraints usually imposed by the hegemonic IMF and World Bank?», «In sum, Reinert’s text is to be recommended to those interested inunderstanding and seeking solutions for the disparate wealth of nations thatnow plagues the modern world. The majority analysis offered by standardneoclassical economics as embedded in the Washington Consensus is justnot adequate.»;

Jayati Ghosh, PhD — https://www.networkideas.org/book/jun2007/bk14_HRC_Review.htm ;

[REVIEW_RETELLING] Osman-Rani Hassan, University of Malaya — https://ijie.um.edu.my/RePEc/umk/journl/v2i1/a6.pdf
Ibrahim Ndoma, University of Malaya — https://sci-hub.se/10.1080/00472336.2010.507069 — «In as much as it is an awesome intellectual piece, there is a fundamental shortcoming found within the book. Reinert has unearthed and lucidly addressed thedynamics of wealth and poverty of nations which are undoubtedly the first point ofcall; however, he does not direct his theoretical or empirical searchlight to theinternal political economy of poor nations. Corruption, rent-seeking, cronyism,mismanagement, political instability, ethic division, wars, and so on, aresynonymous with poor nations and are powerful deterrents of growth anddevelopment. The so-called emulation that he advocates will in no way be successfulwith these powerful economic deterrents in place. While he experiments from theangle of economic preponderance and subjugation of the rich against poor countries, he should have equally examined the internal problems of poor nations whichsignificantly contribute to their present state of poverty.»

[REVIEW_RETELLING] Emmanuel Comolet, Chargé de mission à l’Agence française de développement (AFD) — https://www.cairn.info/revue-afrique-contemporaine-2010-3-page-152.htm — «L’analyse, surtout qualitative, faite dans cet ouvrage est convaincante. On peut néanmoins regretter l’absence de données plus précises pour étayer son propos?: l’argumentation historique est réussie mais l’ouvrage eût été encore plus probant avec une ou deux études approfondies de cas récents. Il est dommage que l’auteur ne se soit pas penché sur des pays émergents contemporains comme la Chine ou l’Afrique du Sud pour montrer l’actualité de ses analyses.»

[REVIEW_LONG] Caetano Pena, Universidade de Tecnologia de Tallinn, Estônia — http://www.revistaoikos.org/seer/index.php/oikos/article/download/88/59

[REVIEW_ONE_PAGE] Robbie Robertson, La Trobe University, Victoria — https://sci-hub.se/10.1111/j.1467-7660.2009.01519_1.x — «Although they claim to counter the ahistorical features of neoclassical economics,both writers fail to contextualize their studies historically. Policies that worked forsmall communities in barely connected regions 600 years ago might not work in amore globalized world today. Policies that enabled catch-up in the nineteenth centurymight not work when the catch-up required is so much greater and the competitioneven keener.»

[BOOK_OR_AUTHOR_OR_CONCEPT_CRITICISM] Paul Collier, Oxford University — http://bresserpereira.org.br/terceiros/07.10.paulcollier-prospect.pdf — «It is the casual passage fromthis to its advocacy of protectionism, which in the context of those countries stuck at the bottom of the world economy isdoubly crazy.», «The first respect in which it is crazy is that it ignores politics. Protection opens up a political process of lobbying andcorruption, which, in the context of already dysfunctional polities, is liable to dominate any technocratic economic strategy.This is not hypothetical: it is what has happened across Africa.», «On Reinert’s criteria, the 20th-century protectionist experiment that should have stood the best chance ofsuccess was India. Here was an internal market larger than the entire 53 countries of Africa which maintained a very hightariff wall from the 1940s until 1991. Yet during this period, India stagnated. Only once it liberalised did it begin to develop.Nor were the companies established under protectionism the basis for subsequent success.», «The most astonishing omission from Reinert's book is any analysis of the recent manufacturing success of developingcountries in global markets», «Protection does have a role to play in helping Africa to industrialise, but not the protection of domestic markets that Reinertfancifully imagines would help the region. Africa needs protection from Asia in rich-world markets until it develops themanufacturing agglomerations that would give it a chance of competing.»; ответ Райнерта — «I don’t blame trade liberalisation for poverty, as Collier states. I blame premature trade liberalisation on the one hand (the right) and I blame protection without competition on the other hand (the left).», «Collier measures success as increased trade. I measure success as an increase in real wages. Collier fails to address the problem I point to: that his success criteria often conflict with mine.»

Martin Wolf, Financial Times — https://www.ft.com/content/da491b56-34fd-11dc-bb16-0000779fd2ac — «Yet this example makes no sense for most, if not all, contemporary developing countries. The technological gap between the UK and the US in the 19th century was trivial by comparison with that between, say, the US and Ethiopia today»

[BOOK_SERIES] Экономическая теория

[ADDITIONAL_READING] Nancy McLean — «Democracy in Chains»

Frederic Lee — A History of Heterodox Economics: Challenging the Mainstream in the Twentieth Century

-->
1. Райнерт Эрик С. — Как богатые страны стали богатыми, и почему бедные страны остаются бедными (Высшая школа экономики, 2016).pdf

<a id="Этика"></a>
# Этика

<a id="История-этики"></a>
## История этики

<!--- [DUPLICATE_GI]

[INFO] Попкова — доктор философских наук.

[ADDITIONAL_READING] Peter Singer — «Ethics in the Real World: 82 Brief Essays on Things That Matter»

Thomas Pölzler — «Moral Reality and the Empirical Sciences» -->
1. [Попкова Наталья Владимировна](https://www.tu-bryansk.ru/sveden/employees/304) — Введение в этику (Либроком, 2011).pdf

<a id="Этические-понятия-направления-и-произведения"></a>
## Этические понятия, направления и произведения

<!--- [INFO] Нет информации о научных редакторах/консультантах/рецензентах. Google не знает Н. А. Баранову и Л. Б. Родкину. Так что не первая категория, несмотря на огромный авторский состав.

[INFO] «Энциклопедический словарь по этике стал центральной частью широкого исследовательского проекта по систематизации этических знаний, осуществленного в секторе этики Института философии РАН при поддержке (в 1995—1997) Российского гуманитарного научного фонда.»

[BOOK_SUPPORT] Федеральная программа книгоиздания России

[ADDITIONAL_READING] Канке Виктор Андреевич — Современная этика

Владимир Петрович Клычков и другие — Основы этических знаний

[DUPLICATE_GI]
-->
1. [Апресян Рубен Грантович](https://iphras.ru/apressyan.htm), [Гусейнов Абдусалам Абдулкеримович](https://iphras.ru/guseinov.htm) (под редакцией) — Этика. Энциклопедический словарь (Гардарики, 2001).djvu

<a id="Языки"></a>
# Языки

<a id="Вавилонский-синдром"></a>
## Вавилонский синдром

<!--- [N/Pro]

[PROFESSIONAL_DEGREE][CRIM_PSYCHOANALYST] [Personal site](http://claudepiron.free.fr/) — «Svisa psikologo kun forta intereso pri lingvoj, diplomito de la Interpretista Lernejo de Ĝeneva Universitato, Claude Piron estis tradukisto en UN (Novjorko) de 1956 ĝis 1961 (francen el la angla, ĉina, hispana kaj rusa).», «Li poste laboris ok jarojn en Monda Organizo pri Sano, i.a. en Orienta Azio kaj Afriko. Trejnita kiel psikanalizisto kaj psikoterapiisto, li komencis praktiki psikoterapion en 1969 en la ĝeneva regiono (de 1999 en Gland, Svislando). Li instruis en la Psikologia kaj Edukscienca Fako de Ĝeneva Universitato de 1973 ĝis emeritiĝo en 1994. Lia ĉefa aktiveco, krom la psikoterapia praktikado, estis profesie trejni junajn psikoterapiistojn, per kontrolo de ilia laboro kaj partopreno en trejnaj seminarioj. Li ofte prelegis pri psikologiaj problemoj, ĉefe en rilato kun la spirita vivo, aŭ (malpli ofte) pri internacia komunikado kaj Esperanto.»

[NO_SCEDRECO]

[REVIEW_CHECK] 2021-9-16

[POSITIVE_OR_NEUTRAL_REVIEW] Robert Phillipson, University of Roskilde, Denmark, [Language in Society](https://sci-hub.se/10.1017/S0047404500019448) — «The force of Piron's argument is slightly muted by a degree of repetition in his text, and by a recurrence in succeeding chapters of examples of linguistic misunderstandings, polysemy in English, and failure by various language users to achieve 100% correctness.», « One could also object that his data are anecdotal and relatively soft. The book has little apparatus of academic referencing; greater use of this might have increased the rigor of Piron's argument, and added the weight of others to support his case. His coverage of child language learning would clearly have benefited from more psycholinguistic input, and his coverage of foreign language learning would have been less rigid if he had drawn on more of the relevant scientific literature», «however, many of the topics Piron covers are ignored in applied linguistics and sociolinguistics. For instance, he describes several dimensions of code-switching of which specialists in code-switching may be unaware. Scholars in language policy, the sociology of language, "international" languages, and the global reproduction of language hierarchies have much to learn from Piron.», «Methodological worries pale before the force of the wealth of evidence that Piron marshals, at a variety of levels.», «Piron's book, however, is sui generis vivid, partisan, persuasive, and passionate. The book is thoroughly diagnostic and didactic, the reader being firmly guided through necessary psychotherapy so as to get at the root of taboos and false rationalizations.», «However, the hammering home of Piron's points doubtless reflects the harsh experience of Esperantists who do not have their cause taken seriously, and therefore need to spell out at length a cast-iron case. There is no mistaking Piron's meticulous and comprehensive denunciation of the status quo (the 'mess' in his subtitle) and his detailed articulation of the case for an alternative (his 'common sense')», «I find it sobering to realize that such a substantial chunk of my academic patch has hitherto been virtually unexplored. For anyone seeking to temper the oppression of linguistic hegemonies, the alternative of an international auxiliary language that does not serve particular national interests deserves serious and urgent consideration.»

-->
1. Piron Claude — O Desafio das Línguas꞉ Da má gestão ao bom senso (Campinas, Pontes Editores, 2007).pdf