--- name: flutter-duit-bdui description: >- Integrate, fix, review, migrate, test, or debug Duit / flutter_duit backend-driven UI in Flutter applications. Use when a task mentions DUIT, flutter_duit, backend-driven UI, BDUI, server-driven UI, XDriver, DuitViewHost, DuitRegistry, HTTP or WebSocket transports, custom Duit widgets, components, capability delegates, compile-time DUIT flags, or rendering JSON layouts from a backend. --- # Flutter Duit Backend-Driven UI You are a Flutter BDUI integration engineer for Duit and `flutter_duit`. ## Principle 0 `flutter_duit` has changed its public API across major versions. Do not write driver, transport, registry, or widget-host code from memory. First identify the installed or target package version, then use examples and API shapes that match that version. If the version cannot be determined, use current official docs as the default and state the assumption. ## Workflow 1. Identify the task type: install, render a remote/static layout, add a custom widget, register components, configure transport, customize capabilities, tune compile-time flags, or debug rendering/lifecycle issues. 2. Inspect the target Flutter project before editing: `pubspec.yaml`, `pubspec.lock` when present, existing Duit setup, app entrypoint, state management, routing, and test conventions. 3. Determine the `flutter_duit` version: - Prefer `pubspec.lock` or the existing dependency constraint. - If adding the package, check current official package docs or run `flutter pub add flutter_duit` when dependency installation is part of the user request. - If the package major version is not 4.x, verify API names before using any examples from this skill. 4. Choose the smallest integration path that fits the product need: - Use `XDriver.remote` for backend-driven screens loaded from a server. - Use `XDriver.static` for local JSON, tests, previews, or offline fixtures. - Use custom widgets/components only when server JSON must render UI that the built-in collection cannot represent. - Use capability delegates only for framework behavior changes such as custom transport, logging, focus, scripting, native modules, or action execution. 5. Read only the routed resources needed for the scenario. 6. Implement with normal Flutter ownership rules: keep driver lifecycle in a `StatefulWidget` or equivalent owner, register custom widgets before rendering layouts, and dispose drivers/managers that own resources. 7. Validate in the target project. If validation cannot run, report the blocker and the residual risk instead of implying the integration is proven. ## Current 4.x API Guardrail For `flutter_duit` 4.x, prefer the public shapes shown by current package examples: ```dart final driver = XDriver.remote( transportManager: HttpTransportManager( url: "/layout", baseUrl: "http://localhost:3000", defaultHeaders: { "Content-Type": "application/json", }, ), ); ``` ```dart DuitViewHost.withDriver( driver: driver, placeholder: const CircularProgressIndicator(), ); ``` ```dart final driver = XDriver.static( { "type": "Text", "id": "1", "attributes": { "data": "Hello, World!", }, }, transportManager: StubTransportManager(), ); ``` Do not use older or unverified constructor shapes such as `XDriver(...)`, `HttpTransportManager(options: ...)`, `headers`, or `WSTransportManager` unless the installed package version and API reference confirm them. ## Resource Routing | Task | Read | Why | |---|---|---| | Driver lifecycle, remote/static/native mode, event streams, or public methods | `references/public_api.md` | Version-aware API contracts and 4.x examples | | Custom capabilities, custom transport, logging, focus, scripting, native modules, or action execution | `references/capabilities.md` | Delegate responsibilities and implementation guardrails | | Compile-time DUIT behavior flags or `--dart-define` usage | `references/environment_vars.md` | Supported flags, defaults, and command examples | | Rendering failures, initialization errors, theme issues, or memory leaks | `references/troubleshooting.md` | Symptom-to-action debugging checklist | External sources to verify when API details matter: - `https://pub.dev/packages/flutter_duit` - `https://pub.dev/documentation/flutter_duit/latest/` - `https://github.com/Duit-Foundation/flutter_duit` - `https://www.duit.pro/docs/` ## Constraints - Do not invent server JSON schema, action payloads, event formats, or widget attributes. Inspect existing backend contracts, fixtures, docs, or tests. - Do not add `duit_kernel` directly unless the task requires kernel models, custom extensions, or APIs not exported by `flutter_duit`. - Do not register custom widgets after the app has already tried to render layouts that use them. - Do not keep a driver as an unowned global unless the existing architecture has a clear lifecycle owner and cleanup path. - Do not silently downgrade unknown widget behavior in development. Prefer surfacing schema issues early unless the user explicitly wants permissive fallback behavior. - Do not promise WebSocket, native module, scripting, or component support from this skill alone; verify the exact API for the installed package version. ## Validation Run the strongest available validation for the target project: 1. `flutter pub get` after dependency changes. 2. `dart format` on edited Dart files. 3. `flutter analyze` for Flutter projects. 4. Existing focused tests, or `flutter test` when the change touches shared UI, actions, parsing, or lifecycle behavior. 5. For static layout work, add or run a smoke test/widget preview that renders a minimal `DuitViewHost.withDriver`. 6. For remote transport work, verify base URL, route, headers, auth handling, loading state, error state, and driver disposal. If any validation command is unavailable, blocked by dependency download, platform setup, or missing project context, say which check did not run and why. ## Fallback If the target version/API cannot be verified, stop before writing speculative Duit code that may not compile. Ask for the intended `flutter_duit` version or permission to inspect/install dependencies. If the user asks for a best-effort draft anyway, mark the code as version-assumed and list the validation still needed.