{ "namespace": "event-assessment", "expanded": "Event Assessment", "refs": [ "http://www.foo.be/docs/intelligence/Tversky_Kahneman_1974.pdf", "http://www.foo.be/docs/intelligence/PsychofIntelNew.pdf" ], "description": "A series of assessment predicates describing the event assessment performed to make judgement(s) under a certain level of uncertainty.", "version": 2, "predicates": [ { "value": "alternative-points-of-view-process", "expanded": "Alternative points of view process", "description": "A list of procedures or practices which describe alternative points of view to validate or rate an analysis. The list describes techniques or methods which could reinforce the estimative language in a human analysis and/or challenge the assumptions to reduce the potential bias of the analysis introduced by the analyst(s).", "uuid": "3016ceb4-6142-509d-aba0-891e90b777b8" } ], "values": [ { "predicate": "alternative-points-of-view-process", "entry": [ { "value": "analytic-debates-within-the-organisation", "expanded": "analytic debates within the organisation", "uuid": "c920129b-574b-517b-9e41-87283b2d2019" }, { "value": "devils-advocates-methodology", "expanded": "Devil's advocates methodology", "uuid": "f2a3c77e-422a-5c70-9e6c-b3977f5a9f3f" }, { "value": "competitive-analysis", "expanded": "competitive analysis", "uuid": "344dfc4a-a02e-5c4b-9216-ee529b0f8cb9" }, { "value": "interdisciplinary-brainstorming", "expanded": "interdisciplinary brainstorming", "uuid": "3cc0ee72-ad56-52d9-b9fe-0341ffafbfb1" }, { "value": "intra-office-peer-review", "expanded": "intra-office peer review", "uuid": "351e7981-0ded-5cb5-b1b6-6ad5f709a93e" }, { "value": "outside-expertise-review", "expanded": "Outside expertise review", "uuid": "65aafb59-7e72-51c0-afb8-92ca810a82e2" } ] } ], "uuid": "e9279d6f-b066-59ec-af58-569225b4d04d" }