--- name: landing-page description: Use when designing or rewriting a high-converting landing page (single-offer page) for SaaS/apps/services. Covers structure, layout patterns, conversion strategies, copywriting, SEO/AEO, and common pitfalls. --- # Landing Page (High‑Conversion) — Web Design Skill A landing page is not a homepage. A homepage serves multiple intents. A landing page wins one intent: **one offer → one audience → one primary action**. ## Before you design/write Gather (ask if missing): ### 1) Page purpose - What is the ONE primary action? (trial, demo, buy, waitlist, download) - What’s the offer? (exactly what do they get?) - What counts as conversion? (click, signup, purchase) ### 2) Audience + context - Who is the ICP? - What problem are they trying to solve? - Top 3 objections (why they don’t convert today) - Traffic source: ads / search / social / email - What do visitors already know when they land? ### 3) Proof + assets - Any proof points: logos, testimonials, numbers, case studies - Screenshots, demo video, product GIFs - Guarantees / refund / cancellation terms ### 4) Constraints - Brand voice: casual vs professional - Design direction: minimal editorial vs playful 3D vs glass UI - Mobile priority? --- ## Core structure (what it should include) ### Above the fold (must) 1) **Headline** (outcome + audience) 2) **Subheadline** (clarifies “how” + adds specificity) 3) **Primary CTA** (clear verb + what they get) 4) **One proof signal** (logo strip / stat / short testimonial) 5) **Hero visual** (product screenshot/video) *or* a strong illustration ### Mid page (argument) 6) **Problem → solution** (1 section) 7) **Benefits** (3–5, outcome-driven) 8) **How it works** (3 steps) 9) **Social proof** (testimonials/case study) ### Bottom (objection handling) 10) **FAQ** (6–12 Q/A) 11) **Risk reversal** (trial, cancel anytime, guarantee) 12) **Final CTA** (same as top) --- ## Layout types (pick one) ### A) Classic hero + sections (most common) Best when: - product is understandable with a hero screenshot ### B) Long-form story (sales page) Best when: - you need to educate + overcome skepticism ### C) Minimal conversion page Best when: - high-intent traffic (email → known users) - short offer (download, waitlist) ### D) Comparison landing page Best when: - search intent includes alternatives (“X vs Y”, “best for…”)—usually paired with SEO pages --- ## High‑conversion strategies (practical) ### 1) Match message to source If traffic is from ads: - mirror the ad headline in the hero - use the same promise and visual tone ### 2) Make the next step obvious - one primary CTA - avoid multiple competing CTAs above the fold ### 3) Write benefit-first - Features: what it does - Benefits: what that means for them ### 4) Use specificity - ❌ “Save time and streamline” - ✅ “Cut your weekly reporting from 4 hours to 15 minutes” ### 5) Reduce risk Pick at least one: - free trial - free plan - no credit card - cancel anytime - money-back guarantee ### 6) Objection handling is a section, not a footer - add FAQ earlier if it’s a high-friction offer - put proof right next to the claim it supports --- ## Copywriting templates ### Headline formulas - “{Outcome} without {pain}” - “The {category} for {audience}” - “Ship {result} in {time}” ### Subheadline rules - 1–2 sentences - clarify what it is + who it’s for ### CTA rules - Verb + what they get - Avoid weak CTAs: “Learn more”, “Submit” Examples: - “Start free trial” - “Book a demo” - “Get the checklist” ### Benefit bullets Format: - **Benefit** — proof/detail Example: - **Faster iteration** — generate 3 layout variants in one click. --- ## Section-by-section workflow (designer-friendly) Work in this order: 1) Hero 2) Benefits 3) How it works 4) Proof 5) FAQ 6) Final CTA Rule: don’t rebuild the whole page each time. Iterate section-by-section to keep control. --- ## SEO + AEO checklist (when relevant) ### When landing pages should NOT be indexed - ad-only campaigns - highly time-bound offers Use: - `noindex` (or keep it behind a non-indexed path) ### When they SHOULD be indexed - evergreen offers - search intent matches the promise Add: - clear title + meta - internal links from homepage/feature pages - FAQ in plain Q/A for AEO Optional: - FAQ schema (if appropriate) --- ## Common pitfalls - Too many CTAs above the fold - Vague value prop (“streamline”, “optimize”) - Big feature list with no outcomes - Proof hidden at the bottom - Mobile layout breaks readability - No clear next step --- ## Output format (when generating a landing page) Return: 1) **Page outline** (sections + order) 2) **Hero copy** (headline, subheadline, CTA, proof line) 3) **Benefits section** (3–5 bullets) 4) **How it works** (3 steps) 5) **FAQ** (6–12 Q/A) 6) **SEO/AEO** (indexing recommendation + title/meta if indexed) 7) **Layout recommendation** (A/B/C/D + why) --- ## Quick questions (if user says “make a landing page”) - What’s the ONE primary CTA? - Who is the ICP and what’s the main pain? - Any proof (numbers/testimonials/logos)? - What’s the offer and risk reversal? - Where is traffic coming from?