--- scope: universal description: | Prevent AI hallucination and ensure evidence-based responses when analyzing code or making suggestions. Use when: analyzing code, making recommendations, providing options, or when user asks about confidence/certainty. Keywords: certainty, assumption, inference, evidence, source, 確定性, 推測, 假設, 來源, 證據. --- # AI Collaboration Standards > **Language**: English | [繁體中文](../../locales/zh-TW/skills/ai-collaboration-standards/SKILL.md) **Version**: 1.1.0 **Last Updated**: 2026-01-25 **Applicability**: Claude Code Skills --- ## Purpose This skill ensures AI assistants provide accurate, evidence-based responses without hallucination. ## Quick Reference ### Unified Tag System This skill uses two complementary tag categories: **Category 1: Certainty Tags** (for analyzing existing content) | Tag | Use When | |-----|----------| | `[Confirmed]` | Direct evidence from code/docs | | `[Inferred]` | Logical deduction from evidence | | `[Assumption]` | Based on common patterns (needs verification) | | `[Unknown]` | Information not available | | `[Need Confirmation]` | Requires user clarification | **Category 2: Derivation Tags** (for generating new content) | Tag | Use When | |-----|----------| | `[Source]` | Direct content from spec/requirement | | `[Derived]` | Transformed from source content | | `[Generated]` | AI-generated structure | | `[TODO]` | Requires human implementation | **When to Use Which**: | Workflow | Primary Tags | |----------|--------------| | Code analysis | Certainty Tags | | Reverse engineering | Certainty Tags | | Forward derivation | Derivation Tags | | Spec generation | Derivation Tags | ### Source Types | Source Type | Tag | Reliability | |-------------|-----|-------------| | Project Code | `[Source: Code]` | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ Highest | | Project Docs | `[Source: Docs]` | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ High | | External Docs | `[Source: External]` | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ High | | Web Search | `[Source: Search]` | ⭐⭐⭐ Medium | | AI Knowledge | `[Source: Knowledge]` | ⭐⭐ Low | | User Provided | `[Source: User]` | ⭐⭐⭐ Medium | ### Core Rules 1. **Evidence-Based Only**: Only analyze content that has been explicitly read 2. **Cite Sources**: Include file path and line number for code references 3. **Classify Certainty**: Tag all statements with certainty level 4. **Always Recommend**: When presenting options, include a recommended choice with reasoning ## Detailed Guidelines For complete standards, see: - [Anti-Hallucination Guidelines](./anti-hallucination.md) - [Certainty Labels Reference](./certainty-labels.md) ## Examples ### ✅ Correct Response ``` [Confirmed] src/auth/service.ts:45 - JWT validation uses 'jsonwebtoken' library [Inferred] Based on repository pattern in src/repositories/, likely using dependency injection [Need Confirmation] Should the new feature support multi-tenancy? ``` ### ❌ Incorrect Response ``` The system uses Redis for caching (code not reviewed) The UserService should have an authenticate() method (API not verified) ``` ### ✅ Correct Option Presentation ``` There are three options: 1. Redis caching 2. In-memory caching 3. File-based caching **Recommended: Option 1 (Redis)**: Given the project already has Redis infrastructure and needs cross-instance cache sharing, Redis is the most suitable choice. ``` ### ❌ Incorrect Option Presentation ``` There are three options: 1. Redis caching 2. In-memory caching 3. File-based caching Please choose one. ``` ## Checklist Before making any statement: - [ ] Source Verified - Have I read the actual file/document? - [ ] Source Type Tagged - Did I specify `[Source: Code]`, `[Source: External]`, etc.? - [ ] Reference Cited - Did I include file path and line number? - [ ] Certainty Classified - Did I tag as `[Confirmed]`, `[Inferred]`, etc.? - [ ] No Fabrication - Did I avoid inventing APIs, configs, or requirements? - [ ] Recommendation Included - When presenting options, did I include a recommended choice? --- ## Configuration Detection This skill supports project-specific language configuration for certainty tags. ### Detection Order 1. Check `CONTRIBUTING.md` for "Certainty Tag Language" section 2. If found, use the specified language (English / 中文) 3. If not found, **default to English** tags ### First-Time Setup If no configuration found and context is unclear: 1. Ask the user: "This project hasn't configured certainty tag language preference. Which would you like to use? (English / 中文)" 2. After user selection, suggest documenting in `CONTRIBUTING.md`: ```markdown ## Certainty Tag Language This project uses **[English / 中文]** certainty tags. ``` ### Configuration Example In project's `CONTRIBUTING.md`: ```markdown ## Certainty Tag Language This project uses **English** certainty tags. ### Tag Reference - [Confirmed] - Direct evidence from code/docs - [Inferred] - Logical deduction from evidence - [Assumption] - Based on common patterns - [Unknown] - Information not available - [Need Confirmation] - Requires user clarification ``` --- ## Related Standards - [Anti-Hallucination Standards](../../core/anti-hallucination.md) - [Code Review Checklist](../../core/code-review-checklist.md) - [Testing Standards](../../core/testing-standards.md) --- ## Version History | Version | Date | Changes | |---------|------|---------| | 1.1.0 | 2026-01-25 | Added: Unified Tag System with Certainty and Derivation tag categories | | 1.0.0 | 2025-12-24 | Added: Standard sections (Purpose, Related Standards, Version History, License) | --- ## License This skill is released under [CC BY 4.0](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). **Source**: [universal-dev-standards](https://github.com/AsiaOstrich/universal-dev-standards)