--- name: research-methodology description: Systematic approach to gathering book research including source evaluation, citation formatting, fact-checking, and research organization. Use when conducting research, evaluating sources, or managing citations. version: 1.2.0 tags: [research, citations, fact-checking, sources, bibliography] changelog: - 1.2.0 (2025-11-27): Flexible source targets (quality over quantity), removed rigid 10+ quota - 1.1.0 (2025-11-26): Optimized for rapid research (3-4 hrs/chapter), removed interviews, strengthened source authentication requirements - 1.0.0 (2025-11-26): Initial release --- # Research Methodology Skill This skill provides systematic procedures for gathering, evaluating, and organizing research for book writing. ## When to Use This Skill - Beginning research on a new book topic - Evaluating source credibility and relevance - Organizing research notes and citations - Fact-checking claims during writing or editing - Managing bibliography and references - Planning research timelines for rapid book generation (target: 1 week) - Managing digital research assets ## Research Workflow ### Phase 1: Planning (10% of research time) 1. **Define Research Questions** - What are the core questions this book answers? - What subsidiary questions emerge from the core? - What knowledge gaps need filling? 2. **Set Source Targets** - **Quality over quantity**: Use as many sources as needed for conceptual reliability - Guideline: 5-15 sources per major section (adjust based on topic depth) - Niche topics may have fewer authoritative sources — that's acceptable - Balance: Prioritize Tier 1, supplement with Tier 2, avoid Tier 3 - Aim for diverse perspectives (avoid echo chambers) 3. **Establish Timeline** - Research sprint: 3-4 hours per chapter section (rapid generation mode) - Full book research: 5-7 days maximum - Source evaluation: real-time (as you discover sources) - Synthesis: continuous (don't wait until end) ### Phase 2: Discovery (40% of research time) 1. **Initial Exploration** - **START ONLY WITH AUTHORITATIVE SOURCES**: Academic databases (Google Scholar, JSTOR, PubMed), official documentation, peer-reviewed journals - **NEVER use Wikipedia or user-editable platforms** as research sources (content can be edited by anyone, unreliable) - Identify key terms, concepts, seminal works from authenticated sources - Map the intellectual landscape using Tier 1 sources 2. **Deep Dive** - Follow citations backward (what influenced this?) - Follow citations forward (who built on this?) - Use academic databases: Google Scholar, JSTOR, PubMed, IEEE Xplore - Access official documentation and technical standards 3. **Authority Identification** - Who are the recognized authorities in this field? - What institutions lead this research area? - Which papers/books are most cited by other Tier 1 sources? ### Phase 3: Evaluation (20% of research time) Apply source evaluation criteria (see below) to all discovered sources. ### Phase 4: Synthesis (30% of research time) 1. **Pattern Recognition** - What themes emerge across sources? - Where do sources agree/disagree? - What narratives compete? 2. **Knowledge Integration** - Connect findings to research questions - Identify supporting evidence for key claims - Document gaps and uncertainties ## Source Evaluation Criteria ### Tier 1: Highly Authoritative (Prioritize) - **Academic Journals**: Peer-reviewed papers in reputable journals - **Academic Books**: Published by university presses or major academic publishers - **Official Documentation**: Government reports, technical standards, official statistics - **Expert Sources**: Published works by recognized domain experts **Verification Checklist**: - [ ] Author has relevant PhD or equivalent expertise - [ ] Published by recognized institution/press - [ ] Peer-reviewed or editorially reviewed - [ ] Cited by other Tier 1 sources - [ ] Methodology clearly documented ### Tier 2: Reliable (Use with verification) - **Reputable News**: Major newspapers, established news organizations - **Trade Publications**: Industry-specific magazines and journals - **Professional Blogs**: Recognized experts in their field - **Technical Documentation**: Official software/product documentation **Verification Checklist**: - [ ] Cross-referenced with at least one Tier 1 source - [ ] Author expertise verified through credentials or body of work - [ ] No obvious bias or conflicts of interest - [ ] Recent publication (within 5 years for technical topics) ### Tier 3: Supplementary (Avoid) - **General Blogs**: Personal opinion pieces (only if from recognized experts) - **Social Media**: Trends and public opinion data (only for cultural context) - **Opinion Pieces**: Clearly labeled as commentary (only from credentialed authors) **Usage Guidelines**: - Never cite as primary source - Never use as factual reference - Always trace to primary Tier 1 source before including in manuscript ### Sources to Avoid - **Wikipedia and user-editable platforms** (anyone can edit, no authentication, unreliable) - **Content farms** (sites generating low-quality content for SEO) - **Outdated information** (>5 years unless historical context) - **Sources with clear undisclosed bias** - **Anonymous or unverifiable authors** - **Predatory journals** (check DOAJ, Beall's List) - **Press releases** without independent verification - **User forums and Q&A sites** (Reddit, Quora, Stack Overflow for facts) - **Crowdsourced content** without editorial oversight ## Citation Format Standards ### APA 7th Edition - In-text: (Author, Year) or Author (Year) - Single author: (Smith, 2020) - Two authors: (Smith & Jones, 2020) - Three or more: (Smith et al., 2020) - Direct quote: (Smith, 2020, p. 42) ### MLA 9th Edition - In-text: (Author Page) or Author (Page) - Single author: (Smith 42) - Two authors: (Smith and Jones 42) - Three or more: (Smith et al. 42) ### Chicago 17th Edition - In-text: Superscript numbers with corresponding footnotes/endnotes ## Fact-Checking Procedures ### Verification Workflow 1. **Identify Claims Requiring Verification** - Mark all factual statements in manuscript - Prioritize: statistics, dates, quotes, technical facts - Tag with confidence level: [VERIFY-HIGH], [VERIFY-MEDIUM], [VERIFY-LOW] 2. **Cross-Reference** - Check claim against minimum 2 independent sources - For critical claims: require 3+ sources - Document which sources confirm/contradict 3. **Document Confidence** - High: 3+ Tier 1 sources agree, recent data - Medium: 2 Tier 1 or 3+ Tier 2 sources agree - Low: Single source or conflicting sources - Flag: Unverifiable or conflicting ### Verification Standards | Confidence | Criteria | Action | |------------|----------|--------| | **High** | 3+ Tier 1 sources agree, recent (<2 years), methodology clear | Use without qualification | | **Medium** | 2 Tier 1 or 3+ Tier 2 sources agree, <5 years old | Use with standard citation | | **Low** | Single source or conflicting sources, methodology unclear | Present with explicit uncertainty | | **Unverified** | No reliable sources found or significant conflict | Flag for additional research or remove | ## Research Organization ### Directory Structure ``` research/ ├── [topic-1]/ │ ├── primary-sources.md │ ├── synthesis.md │ ├── bibliography.md │ ├── fact-checks.md │ └── assets/ ├── [topic-2]/ │ └── ... ├── cross-references.md └── research-log.md ``` ## Quality Assurance Checklist ### Before Moving to Writing Phase **Source Quality**: - [ ] Sufficient sources for conceptual reliability (5-15 per section, topic-dependent) - [ ] Tier 1 sources prioritized (majority when available) - [ ] No sources from "avoid" category (NO Wikipedia, user-editable platforms) - [ ] All sources authenticated and verified - [ ] Diverse perspectives represented (avoid echo chamber) - [ ] Source gaps documented if topic has limited authoritative coverage **Citation Completeness**: - [ ] Citations formatted correctly and consistently - [ ] Access dates recorded for all web sources - [ ] DOIs included for all academic papers (where available) - [ ] Page numbers noted for all direct quotes **Time Efficiency**: - [ ] Research time target met (3-4 hours per chapter section) - [ ] No time wasted on Wikipedia or unverified sources - [ ] Citation metadata captured immediately (no backtracking) ## Common Pitfalls to Avoid 1. **Over-reliance on Secondary Sources**: Always trace to primary source 2. **Confirmation Bias**: Actively seek sources that challenge assumptions 3. **Using Wikipedia**: Start ONLY with academic databases, peer-reviewed journals 4. **Outdated Information**: Check publication dates for technical topics 5. **Missing Citations**: Record source immediately 6. **Incomplete Metadata**: Capture all citation elements on first pass 7. **Assuming AI Accuracy**: Verify all AI-provided facts with primary sources ## Time Budget Quick Reference ``` Chapter section (3,000-5,000 words): 3-4 hours Major chapter (10,000-15,000 words): 8-12 hours Full book research varies by depth: - Light research (established topics): 30-40 hours (5-7 days) - Standard research (mixed sources): 50-70 hours (1-2 weeks) - Deep research (novel/technical): 80-120 hours (2-4 weeks) Efficiency keys: - Academic databases only (no Wikipedia browsing) - Parallel research (multiple topics simultaneously) - Immediate citation capture (no backtracking) ``` ### Timeline Realism > **⚠️ Note:** Research timelines depend heavily on: > - Topic familiarity (established vs. cutting-edge) > - Source availability (abundant vs. niche) > - Depth required (overview vs. comprehensive) **Adjust expectations based on actual source landscape, not arbitrary deadlines.** --- **Skill Version**: 1.2.0 **Last Updated**: 2025-11-27 **Maintained By**: Universal Pedagogical Engine Team