--- name: four-bbs-roadmap description: Use during quarterly or annual roadmap planning, when Engineering wants tech debt work while PMs want features and Leadership wants moonshots, to force explicit resource allocation --- # The Four BBs Strategy Framework ## Overview A strategic allocation framework to categorize product work into **four distinct buckets**, ensuring balanced roadmap between maintenance, growth, and innovation. **Core principle:** If I gave you 100 focus points, how much goes in each bucket? ## The Four Buckets ``` ┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ RISK │ │ Low ◄─────────────────────────────► High │ │ ┌───────────────────────┬───────────────────────┐ │ │ │ BRILLIANT BASICS │ BIG BETS │ Differen- │ │ │ │ │ tiator │ │ │ Non-negotiable │ Large, risky │ │ │ │ tech debt, hygiene │ initiatives for │ │ │ │ "Brilliant" not │ significant growth │ │ │ │ just "debt" │ │ │ │ ├───────────────────────┼───────────────────────┤ │ │ │ BREAD AND BUTTER │ BREAKING BAD │ Transform- │ │ │ │ │ ational │ │ │ Core features, │ Existential pivots, │ │ │ │ incremental │ moonshots, │ │ │ │ optimizations │ redefine identity │ │ │ └───────────────────────┴───────────────────────┘ │ │ Incremental Foundational │ └─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ ``` ## Example Allocation | Role | Brilliant Basics | Bread & Butter | Big Bets | Breaking Bad | |------|-----------------|----------------|----------|--------------| | Mature Product | 20% | 50% | 25% | 5% | | Growth Stage | 15% | 40% | 35% | 10% | | Pivot Mode | 10% | 20% | 30% | 40% | ## Common Mistakes - Calling foundational work "tech debt" (demotivating) - Getting stuck in Bread & Butter without investing in Big Bets - No explicit allocation conversation with stakeholders --- *Source: Anuj Rathi (Jupiter Money, Swiggy, Flipkart) via Lenny's Podcast*