--- name: aif-ci description: Generate CI/CD pipeline (GitHub Actions / GitLab CI) with linting, static analysis, tests, security. Use when user says "ci", "setup ci", "github actions", "gitlab ci", "pipeline". argument-hint: "[github|gitlab] [--enhance]" allowed-tools: Read Edit Glob Grep Write Bash(git *) Questions disable-model-invocation: true metadata: author: AI Factory version: "1.0" category: ci --- # CI — Pipeline Configuration Generator Analyze a project and generate production-grade CI/CD pipeline configuration for GitHub Actions or GitLab CI. Generates separate jobs for linting, static analysis, tests, and security scanning — adapted to the project's language, framework, and existing tooling. **Three modes based on what exists:** | What exists | Mode | Action | |-------------|------|--------| | No CI config | `generate` | Create pipeline from scratch with interactive setup | | CI config exists but incomplete | `enhance` | Audit & improve, add missing jobs | | Full CI config | `audit` | Audit against best practices, fix gaps | --- ## Step 0: Load Project Context Read the project description if available: ``` Read .ai-factory/DESCRIPTION.md ``` Store project context for later steps. If absent, Step 2 detects everything. **Read `.ai-factory/skill-context/aif-ci/SKILL.md`** — MANDATORY if the file exists. This file contains project-specific rules accumulated by `/aif-evolve` from patches, codebase conventions, and tech-stack analysis. These rules are tailored to the current project. **How to apply skill-context rules:** - Treat them as **project-level overrides** for this skill's general instructions - When a skill-context rule conflicts with a general rule written in this SKILL.md, **the skill-context rule wins** (more specific context takes priority — same principle as nested CLAUDE.md files) - When there is no conflict, apply both: general rules from SKILL.md + project rules from skill-context - Do NOT ignore skill-context rules even if they seem to contradict this skill's defaults — they exist because the project's experience proved the default insufficient - **CRITICAL:** skill-context rules apply to ALL outputs of this skill — including generated CI workflow files and audit reports. Templates in this skill are **base structures**. If a skill-context rule says "CI MUST include step X" or "workflow MUST have job Y" — you MUST augment the templates accordingly. Generating CI config that violates skill-context rules is a bug. **Enforcement:** After generating any output artifact, verify it against all skill-context rules. If any rule is violated — fix the output before presenting it to the user. --- ## Step 1: Detect Existing CI & Determine Mode ### 1.1 Scan for Existing CI Configuration ``` Glob: .github/workflows/*.yml, .github/workflows/*.yaml, .gitlab-ci.yml, .circleci/config.yml, Jenkinsfile, .travis.yml, bitbucket-pipelines.yml ``` Classify found files: - `HAS_GITHUB_ACTIONS`: `.github/workflows/` contains YAML files - `HAS_GITLAB_CI`: `.gitlab-ci.yml` exists - `HAS_OTHER_CI`: CircleCI, Jenkins, Travis, or Bitbucket detected ### 1.2 Determine Mode **If `$ARGUMENTS` contains `--enhance`** -> set `MODE = "enhance"` regardless. **Path A: No CI config exists** (`!HAS_GITHUB_ACTIONS && !HAS_GITLAB_CI && !HAS_OTHER_CI`): - Set `MODE = "generate"` - Proceed to **Step 1.3: Interactive Setup** **Path B: CI config exists but is incomplete** (e.g., has only tests, no linting): - Set `MODE = "enhance"` - Read all existing CI files -> store as `EXISTING_CONTENT` - Log: "Found existing CI configuration. Will analyze and add missing jobs." **Path C: Full CI setup** (has linting + tests + static analysis): - Set `MODE = "audit"` - Read all existing CI files -> store as `EXISTING_CONTENT` - Log: "Found complete CI setup. Will audit against best practices and fix gaps." ### 1.3 Interactive Setup (Generate Mode Only) **Determine CI platform** from `$ARGUMENTS` or ask: If `$ARGUMENTS` contains `github` -> set `PLATFORM = "github"` If `$ARGUMENTS` contains `gitlab` -> set `PLATFORM = "gitlab"` Otherwise: ``` AskUserQuestion: Which CI/CD platform do you use? Options: 1. GitHub Actions (Recommended) — .github/workflows/*.yml 2. GitLab CI — .gitlab-ci.yml ``` **Ask about optional features:** ``` AskUserQuestion: Which additional CI features do you need? Options (multiSelect): 1. Security scanning — Dependency audit, SAST 2. Coverage reporting — Upload test coverage 3. Matrix builds — Test across multiple language versions 4. None — Just linting, static analysis, and tests ``` Store choices: - `PLATFORM`: github | gitlab - `WANT_SECURITY`: boolean - `WANT_COVERAGE`: boolean - `WANT_MATRIX`: boolean ### 1.4 Read Existing Files (Enhance / Audit Modes) Read all existing CI files and store as `EXISTING_CONTENT`: - All `.github/workflows/*.yml` files - `.gitlab-ci.yml` - Any included GitLab CI files (check `include:` directives) Determine `PLATFORM` from existing files. --- ## Step 2: Deep Project Analysis Scan the project thoroughly — every decision in the generated pipeline depends on this profile. ### 2.1 Language & Runtime | File | Language | |------|----------| | `composer.json` | PHP | | `package.json` | Node.js / TypeScript | | `pyproject.toml` / `setup.py` / `setup.cfg` | Python | | `go.mod` | Go | | `Cargo.toml` | Rust | | `pom.xml` | Java (Maven) | | `build.gradle` / `build.gradle.kts` | Java/Kotlin (Gradle) | ### 2.2 Language Version Detect the project's language version to use in CI: | Language | Version Source | Example | |----------|---------------|---------| | PHP | `composer.json` -> `require.php` | `>=8.2` -> `['8.2', '8.3', '8.4']` | | Node.js | `package.json` -> `engines.node`, `.nvmrc`, `.node-version` | `>=18` -> `[18, 20, 22]` | | Python | `pyproject.toml` -> `requires-python`, `.python-version` | `>=3.11` -> `['3.11', '3.12', '3.13']` | | Go | `go.mod` -> `go` directive | `go 1.23` -> `'1.23'` | | Rust | `Cargo.toml` -> `rust-version`, `rust-toolchain.toml` | `1.82` -> `'1.82'` | | Java | `pom.xml` -> `maven.compiler.source`, `build.gradle` -> `sourceCompatibility` | `17` -> `[17, 21]` | For matrix builds: use the minimum version from the project config as the lowest, and include the latest stable version. For non-matrix builds: use the latest version that satisfies the constraint. ### 2.3 Package Manager & Lock File | File | Package Manager | Install Command | |------|-----------------|-----------------| | `composer.lock` | Composer | `composer install --no-interaction --prefer-dist` | | `bun.lockb` | Bun | `bun install --frozen-lockfile` | | `pnpm-lock.yaml` | pnpm | `pnpm install --frozen-lockfile` | | `yarn.lock` | Yarn | `yarn install --frozen-lockfile` | | `package-lock.json` | npm | `npm ci` | | `uv.lock` | uv | `uv sync --all-extras --dev` | | `poetry.lock` | Poetry | `poetry install` | | `Pipfile.lock` | Pipenv | `pipenv install --dev` | | `requirements.txt` | pip | `pip install -r requirements.txt` | | `go.sum` | Go modules | `go mod download` | | `Cargo.lock` | Cargo | (built-in) | Store: `PACKAGE_MANAGER`, `LOCK_FILE`, `INSTALL_CMD`. ### 2.4–2.7 Tool Detection Detect project tools by scanning config files and dependencies. For the complete tool-to-command mapping → read `references/TOOL-COMMANDS.md` Categories: **Linters & Formatters** (PHP-CS-Fixer, ESLint, Prettier, Biome, Ruff, golangci-lint, clippy, Checkstyle), **Static Analysis** (PHPStan, Psalm, Rector, mypy, tsc), **Test Frameworks** (PHPUnit, Pest, Jest, Vitest, pytest, go test, cargo test) with coverage flags, **Security Audit** (composer audit, npm audit, pip-audit, govulncheck, cargo audit). ### 2.8 Services Detection Check if tests require external services (database, Redis, etc.): ``` Grep in tests/: postgres|mysql|redis|mongo|rabbitmq|elasticsearch Glob: docker-compose.test.yml, docker-compose.ci.yml ``` If services are needed, they will be configured in the CI pipeline as service containers. ### 2.9 Build Output Does the project have a build step? | Language | Has Build | Build Command | |----------|-----------|---------------| | Node.js (with `build` script) | Yes | `npm run build` / `pnpm build` | | Go | Yes | `go build ./...` | | Rust | Yes | `cargo build --release` | | Java | Yes | `mvn package -DskipTests -B` / `./gradlew assemble` | | PHP | Usually no | — | | Python | Usually no | — | ### Summary Build `PROJECT_PROFILE`: - `language`, `language_version`, `language_versions` (for matrix) - `package_manager`, `lock_file`, `install_cmd` - `linters`: list of {name, command, config_file} - `static_analyzers`: list of {name, command} - `test_framework`, `test_cmd`, `coverage_cmd` - `security_tools`: list of {name, command} - `has_build_step`, `build_cmd` - `has_typescript`: boolean (for typecheck job) - `services_needed`: list of services for CI - `source_dir`: main source directory (src/, app/, lib/) --- ## Step 3: Read Best Practices & Templates ``` Read skills/ci/references/BEST-PRACTICES.md ``` Select templates matching the platform and language: **GitHub Actions:** | Language | Template | |----------|----------| | PHP | `templates/github/php.yml` | | Node.js | `templates/github/node.yml` | | Python | `templates/github/python.yml` | | Go | `templates/github/go.yml` | | Rust | `templates/github/rust.yml` | | Java | `templates/github/java.yml` | **GitLab CI:** | Language | Template | |----------|----------| | PHP | `templates/gitlab/php.yml` | | Node.js | `templates/gitlab/node.yml` | | Python | `templates/gitlab/python.yml` | | Go | `templates/gitlab/go.yml` | | Rust | `templates/gitlab/rust.yml` | | Java | `templates/gitlab/java.yml` | Read the selected template: ``` Read skills/ci/templates//.yml ``` --- ## Step 4: Generate Pipeline (Generate Mode) Using the `PROJECT_PROFILE`, best practices, and template as a base, generate a customized CI pipeline. ### 4.1 GitHub Actions Generation **One workflow per concern** — each file has its own triggers, permissions, concurrency: | File | Name | Jobs | When to create | |------|------|------|----------------| | `lint.yml` | Lint | code-style, static-analysis, rector | Linters or SA detected | | `tests.yml` | Tests | tests (+ service containers) | Always | | `build.yml` | Build | build | `has_build_step` | | `security.yml` | Security | dependency-audit, dependency-review | `WANT_SECURITY` | **Why one file per concern:** - Each check is a **separate status check** in PR — instantly see what failed - Independent triggers — security on schedule, tests on push/PR, build only after tests - Independent permissions — security may need `security-events: write` - Can disable/re-run one workflow without touching others - Branch protection rules can require specific workflows (e.g. require `tests` but not `security`) **When to keep single file:** Only for very small projects with just lint + tests (2 jobs). As soon as there are 3+ concerns — split. **Every workflow gets the same header pattern:** ```yaml name: on: push: branches: [main] pull_request: concurrency: group: ${{ github.workflow }}-${{ github.ref }} cancel-in-progress: true permissions: contents: read ``` **Per-file job organization:** **`lint.yml`** — all code quality checks in parallel: | Job | Purpose | When to include | |-----|---------|-----------------| | `code-style` | Formatting (CS-Fixer, Prettier, Ruff format, rustfmt) | Formatter detected | | `lint` | Linting (ESLint, Ruff check, Clippy, golangci-lint) | Linter detected | | `static-analysis` | Type checking / SA (PHPStan, Psalm, mypy, tsc) | SA tools detected | | `rector` | Rector dry-run (PHP only) | Rector detected | All jobs run in parallel (no `needs`). If only one tool detected (e.g. Go with just golangci-lint) — single job in the file is fine. **`tests.yml`** — test suite: | Job | Purpose | When to include | |-----|---------|-----------------| | `tests` | Unit/integration tests | Always | | `tests-` | Tests requiring service containers | `services_needed` detected | Matrix builds (multiple language versions) only in this file. **`build.yml`** — build verification: | Job | Purpose | Notes | |-----|---------|-------| | `build` | Verify compilation/bundling | Can depend on external workflow via `workflow_run` or just run independently | **`security.yml`** — security scanning: | Job | Purpose | Extra triggers | |-----|---------|---------------| | `dependency-audit` | Vulnerability scan | `schedule: cron '0 6 * * 1'` (weekly) | | `dependency-review` | PR dependency diff | Only on `pull_request` | **Per-job rules:** 1. Each job gets its own setup (checkout, language setup, cache, dependency install) 2. Use language-specific setup actions with built-in cache: - PHP: `shivammathur/setup-php@v2` with `tools:` parameter - Node.js: `actions/setup-node@v4` with `cache:` parameter - Python: `astral-sh/setup-uv@v5` (if uv) or `actions/setup-python@v5` (if pip) - Go: `actions/setup-go@v5` (auto-caches) - Rust: `dtolnay/rust-toolchain@stable` + `Swatinem/rust-cache@v2` - Java: `actions/setup-java@v4` with `cache:` parameter 3. Use `fail-fast: false` in matrix builds 4. Upload coverage as artifact when `WANT_COVERAGE` **Matrix builds** (when `WANT_MATRIX`): Only the `tests` job uses a matrix. Lint/SA jobs run on the latest version only. ```yaml tests: name: Tests (${{ matrix.-version }}) strategy: fail-fast: false matrix: -version: ``` **Combining linter jobs:** If the project has both a formatter AND a linter from the same ecosystem, combine them into one job: - PHP: `php-cs-fixer` check + other lint -> `code-style` job - Node.js: `eslint` + `prettier` -> `lint` job. **Biome replaces BOTH ESLint and Prettier** — if Biome is detected, use only `npx biome check .` in a single `lint` job - Python: `ruff check` + `ruff format --check` -> `lint` job (Ruff handles both) - Rust: `cargo fmt` + `cargo clippy` -> can be separate (fmt is fast, clippy needs compilation) **Do NOT combine** lint/SA with tests — they should fail independently with clear feedback. Use the templates in `templates/github/` and `templates/gitlab/` as a base for generating workflow files. Follow the header pattern (name, on, concurrency, permissions) and per-file job organization described above. ### 4.2 GitLab CI Generation Output file: `.gitlab-ci.yml` For GitLab-specific pipeline structure, cache strategy, report format integration, and language-specific patterns → read `references/GITLAB-PATTERNS.md` Pipeline stages: install → lint → test → build → security ### 4.3 Service Containers If `services_needed` is not empty, add service containers to the test job. For GitHub Actions and GitLab CI service container syntax → read `references/SERVICE-CONTAINERS.md` ### Quality Checks (Before Writing) Verify generated pipeline before writing: **Correctness:** - [ ] Every job has checkout/setup/install steps - [ ] Cache is configured for the correct lock file - [ ] All commands match tools actually present in the project - [ ] Matrix versions match the project's version constraints - [ ] Service containers have health checks **Best practices:** - [ ] `concurrency` group set (GitHub Actions) - [ ] `permissions: contents: read` set (GitHub Actions) - [ ] `interruptible: true` set (GitLab CI) - [ ] `workflow.rules` defined (GitLab CI) - [ ] Jobs are parallel where possible (no unnecessary `needs`) - [ ] `fail-fast: false` on matrix builds **No over-engineering:** - [ ] No jobs for tools not present in the project - [ ] No matrix builds if the project only targets one version - [ ] No security scanning unless requested or tools are installed - [ ] No build job if the project has no build step --- ## Step 5: Enhance / Audit Existing Pipeline When `MODE = "enhance"` or `MODE = "audit"`, analyze `EXISTING_CONTENT` against the project profile and best practices. ### 5.1 Gap Analysis Compare existing pipeline against `PROJECT_PROFILE`: **Missing jobs:** - Linter installed but no lint job in CI? - SA tool installed but no SA job? - Tests exist but no test job? - Security tools installed but no security job? **Configuration issues:** - No caching configured? - No concurrency group (GitHub Actions)? - Using deprecated actions (e.g., `actions-rs` instead of `dtolnay/rust-toolchain`)? - Hardcoded language versions instead of variable/matrix? - Missing `fail-fast: false` on matrix? - Using `policy: pull-push` on all GitLab jobs instead of `pull` on non-install jobs? **Missing features:** - No coverage reporting when coverage tools are available? - No JUnit/codequality report integration (GitLab)? - No path filtering for monorepos? - No `workflow_dispatch` trigger (GitHub Actions)? ### 5.2 Audit Report & Fix For audit report format, fix flow options, and display templates → read `references/AUDIT-REPORT.md` Present results as tables with ✅/❌/⚠️ per check. Categorize recommendations by severity (CRITICAL, HIGH, MEDIUM, LOW). Ask user to choose: fix all, fix critical only, or show details first. **If fixing:** preserve existing structure, job names, and ordering conventions. --- ## Step 6: Write Files ### 6.1 Generate Mode — Write Pipeline **GitHub Actions:** ``` Bash: mkdir -p .github/workflows Write .github/workflows/lint.yml # If linters/SA detected Write .github/workflows/tests.yml # Always Write .github/workflows/build.yml # If has_build_step Write .github/workflows/security.yml # If WANT_SECURITY ``` Only create files for detected concerns. If only lint + tests — two files. If the project is trivially small (single lint + single test job) — a single `ci.yml` is acceptable. **GitLab CI:** ``` Write .gitlab-ci.yml ``` GitLab CI uses a single `.gitlab-ci.yml` — stages and DAG (`needs:`) handle separation. ### 6.2 Enhance / Audit Mode — Update Existing Edit existing files using the `Edit` tool. Preserve the original structure and only add/modify what's needed. --- ## Step 7: Summary & Follow-Up ### 7.1 Display Summary Display summary using format from `references/AUDIT-REPORT.md` (Summary Display Template section). Show platform, files created, features, and quick start commands. ### 7.2 Suggest Follow-Up Skills Suggest: `/aif-build-automation` for CI targets in Makefile/Taskfile, `/aif-dockerize` for containerization.