--- name: nosql-expert description: "Expert guidance for distributed NoSQL databases (Cassandra, DynamoDB). Focuses on mental models, query-first modeling, single-table design, and avoiding hot partitions in high-scale systems." metadata: scope: [root] auto_invoke: "Working with nosql expert" --- # NoSQL Expert Patterns (Cassandra & DynamoDB) ## Overview This skill provides professional mental models and design patterns for **distributed wide-column and key-value stores** (specifically Apache Cassandra and Amazon DynamoDB). Unlike SQL (where you model data entities), or document stores (like MongoDB), these distributed systems require you to **model your queries first**. ## When to Use - **Designing for Scale**: Moving beyond simple single-node databases to distributed clusters. - **Technology Selection**: Evaluating or using **Cassandra**, **ScyllaDB**, or **DynamoDB**. - **Performance Tuning**: Troubleshooting "hot partitions" or high latency in existing NoSQL systems. - **Microservices**: Implementing "database-per-service" patterns where highly optimized reads are required. ## The Mental Shift: SQL vs. Distributed NoSQL | Feature | SQL (Relational) | Distributed NoSQL (Cassandra/DynamoDB) | | :--- | :--- | :--- | | **Data modeling** | Model Entities + Relationships | Model **Queries** (Access Patterns) | | **Joins** | CPU-intensive, at read time | **Pre-computed** (Denormalized) at write time | | **Storage cost** | Expensive (minimize duplication) | Cheap (duplicate data for read speed) | | **Consistency** | ACID (Strong) | **BASE (Eventual)** / Tunable | | **Scalability** | Vertical (Bigger machine) | **Horizontal** (More nodes/shards) | > **The Golden Rule:** In SQL, you design the data model to answer *any* query. In NoSQL, you design the data model to answer *specific* queries efficiently. ## Core Design Patterns ### 1. Query-First Modeling (Access Patterns) You typically cannot "add a query later" without migration or creating a new table/index. **Process:** 1. **List all Entities** (User, Order, Product). 2. **List all Access Patterns** ("Get User by Email", "Get Orders by User sorted by Date"). 3. **Design Table(s)** specifically to serve those patterns with a single lookup. ### 2. The Partition Key is King Data is distributed across physical nodes based on the **Partition Key (PK)**. - **Goal:** Even distribution of data and traffic. - **Anti-Pattern:** Using a low-cardinality PK (e.g., `status="active"` or `gender="m"`) creates **Hot Partitions**, limiting throughput to a single node's capacity. - **Best Practice:** Use high-cardinality keys (User IDs, Device IDs, Composite Keys). ### 3. Clustering / Sort Keys Within a partition, data is sorted on disk by the **Clustering Key (Cassandra)** or **Sort Key (DynamoDB)**. - This allows for efficient **Range Queries** (e.g., `WHERE user_id=X AND date > Y`). - It effectively pre-sorts your data for specific retrieval requirements. ### 4. Single-Table Design (Adjacency Lists) *Primary use: DynamoDB (but concepts apply elsewhere)* Storing multiple entity types in one table to enable pre-joined reads. | PK (Partition) | SK (Sort) | Data Fields... | | :--- | :--- | :--- | | `USER#123` | `PROFILE` | `{ name: "Ian", email: "..." }` | | `USER#123` | `ORDER#998` | `{ total: 50.00, status: "shipped" }` | | `USER#123` | `ORDER#999` | `{ total: 12.00, status: "pending" }` | - **Query:** `PK="USER#123"` - **Result:** Fetches User Profile AND all Orders in **one network request**. ### 5. Denormalization & Duplication Don't be afraid to store the same data in multiple tables to serve different query patterns. - **Table A:** `users_by_id` (PK: uuid) - **Table B:** `users_by_email` (PK: email) *Trade-off: You must manage data consistency across tables (often using eventual consistency or batch writes).* ## Specific Guidance ### Apache Cassandra / ScyllaDB - **Primary Key Structure:** `((Partition Key), Clustering Columns)` - **No Joins, No Aggregates:** Do not try to `JOIN` or `GROUP BY`. Pre-calculate aggregates in a separate counter table. - **Avoid `ALLOW FILTERING`:** If you see this in production, your data model is wrong. It implies a full cluster scan. - **Writes are Cheap:** Inserts and Updates are just appends to the LSM tree. Don't worry about write volume as much as read efficiency. - **Tombstones:** Deletes are expensive markers. Avoid high-velocity delete patterns (like queues) in standard tables. ### AWS DynamoDB - **GSI (Global Secondary Index):** Use GSIs to create alternative views of your data (e.g., "Search Orders by Date" instead of by User). - *Note:* GSIs are eventually consistent. - **LSI (Local Secondary Index):** Sorts data differently *within* the same partition. Must be created at table creation time. - **WCU / RCU:** Understand capacity modes. Single-table design helps optimize consumed capacity units. - **TTL:** Use Time-To-Live attributes to automatically expire old data (free delete) without creating tombstones. ## Expert Checklist Before finalizing your NoSQL schema: - [ ] **Access Pattern Coverage:** Does every query pattern map to a specific table or index? - [ ] **Cardinality Check:** Does the Partition Key have enough unique values to spread traffic evenly? - [ ] **Split Partition Risk:** For any single partition (e.g., a single user's orders), will it grow indefinitely? (If > 10GB, you need to "shard" the partition, e.g., `USER#123#2024-01`). - [ ] **Consistency Requirement:** Can the application tolerate eventual consistency for this read pattern? ## Common Anti-Patterns ❌ **Scatter-Gather:** Querying *all* partitions to find one item (Scan). ❌ **Hot Keys:** Putting all "Monday" data into one partition. ❌ **Relational Modeling:** Creating `Author` and `Book` tables and trying to join them in code. (Instead, embed Book summaries in Author, or duplicate Author info in Books).