--- name: novelty-matrix description: | Create a novelty/prior-work matrix comparing the submission’s contributions against related work (overlaps vs deltas). **Trigger**: novelty matrix, prior-work matrix, overlap/delta, 相关工作对比, 新颖性矩阵. **Use when**: peer review 中评估 novelty/positioning,需要把贡献与相关工作逐项对齐并写出差异点证据。 **Skip if**: 缺少 claims(先跑 `claims-extractor`)或你不打算做新颖性定位分析。 **Network**: none (retrieval of additional related work is out-of-scope unless provided). **Guardrail**: 明确 overlap 与 delta;尽量给出可追溯证据来源(来自稿件/引用/作者陈述)。 --- # Novelty Matrix (overlap vs delta) Goal: make novelty/positioning concrete by aligning each contribution against the closest prior work. ## Inputs Required: - `output/CLAIMS.md` Optional: - A provided list of related work (titles/URLs/DOIs) or the submission’s reference list ## Outputs - `output/NOVELTY_MATRIX.md` ## Output format (recommended) - Rows: contributions/claims (from `output/CLAIMS.md`) - Columns: closest related works (provided or cited by the paper) - For each row/column, record: - `overlap`: what is the same - `delta`: what is different/new - `evidence`: where this is supported (paper statement / citation / method difference) ## Workflow 1. Extract the contribution list from `output/CLAIMS.md`. 2. Pick ≥5 closest related works (or state explicitly why you cannot). 3. For each contribution, compare to each related work: - identify overlap - identify delta - attach evidence (quote/section/citation pointer) 4. Summarize: - which contributions look clearly novel - which ones look like incremental variants ## Definition of Done - [ ] Matrix includes ≥5 related works or explains why unavailable. - [ ] Every “delta” entry has a short evidence pointer (not just opinion). ## Troubleshooting ### Issue: no related works list is available **Fix**: - Use the paper’s own citations as the initial related set; if even that is missing, mark `needs_related_work_list` and stop. ### Issue: overlap/delta becomes vague **Fix**: - Force each cell to reference a concrete axis (problem setting, method component, training data, evaluation protocol, result).