--- name: price-target-summary description: Retrieve analysts' price target summary for any stock using Octagon MCP. Use when evaluating analyst sentiment, upside/downside potential, consensus expectations, and tracking target trends over time. --- # Price Target Summary Retrieve aggregated analyst price target data across multiple timeframes using the Octagon MCP server. ## Prerequisites Ensure Octagon MCP is configured in your AI agent (Cursor, Claude Desktop, Windsurf, etc.). See [references/mcp-setup.md](references/mcp-setup.md) for installation instructions. ## Workflow ### 1. Identify the Stock Determine the ticker symbol for the company you want to analyze (e.g., AAPL, MSFT, GOOGL). ### 2. Execute Query via Octagon MCP Use the `octagon-agent` tool with a natural language prompt: ``` Retrieve the analysts' price-target summary for the stock symbol . ``` **MCP Call Format:** ```json { "server": "octagon-mcp", "toolName": "octagon-agent", "arguments": { "prompt": "Retrieve the analysts' price-target summary for the stock symbol AAPL." } } ``` ### 3. Expected Output The agent returns price target data across timeframes: | Timeframe | Number of Analysts | Average Price Target | |-----------|-------------------|---------------------| | Last Month | 9 | $305.72 | | Last Quarter | 16 | $312.80 | | Last Year | 48 | $282.91 | | All Time | 229 | $219.71 | **Key Insights**: Trend analysis comparing timeframes **Data Sources**: octagon-stock-data-agent (aggregating StreetInsider, TheFly, Benzinga, etc.) ### 4. Interpret Results See [references/interpreting-results.md](references/interpreting-results.md) for guidance on: - Analyzing target trends - Calculating upside/downside potential - Understanding analyst coverage - Evaluating consensus strength ## Example Queries **Basic Query:** ``` Retrieve the analysts' price-target summary for the stock symbol AAPL. ``` **With Current Price Context:** ``` What are the analyst price targets for TSLA compared to its current price? ``` **Trend Focus:** ``` How have analyst price targets for NVDA changed over the past year? ``` **Coverage Analysis:** ``` How many analysts cover Microsoft and what are their price targets? ``` **Range Request:** ``` What are the highest and lowest analyst price targets for AMZN? ``` ## Understanding Price Targets ### What Price Targets Represent | Aspect | Description | |--------|-------------| | Definition | Analyst's expected stock price | | Timeframe | Typically 12 months forward | | Basis | Fundamental and technical analysis | | Purpose | Guide for fair value | ### Types of Price Targets | Type | Description | |------|-------------| | Average | Mean of all targets | | Median | Middle value | | High | Most bullish target | | Low | Most bearish target | | Consensus | Weighted average | ## Timeframe Analysis ### Understanding Timeframes | Timeframe | What It Shows | |-----------|---------------| | Last Month | Most recent sentiment | | Last Quarter | Near-term trend | | Last Year | Annual evolution | | All Time | Historical context | ### Trend Interpretation | Pattern | Interpretation | |---------|----------------| | Rising targets | Growing optimism | | Falling targets | Increasing concern | | Stable targets | Consensus maintained | | Diverging targets | Uncertainty/debate | ## Calculating Potential ### Upside/Downside ``` Upside = (Target Price - Current Price) / Current Price × 100% ``` ### Example Calculation - Current Price: $270.01 - Average Target: $312.80 - Upside: ($312.80 - $270.01) / $270.01 = 15.8% ### Interpreting Potential | Upside | Interpretation | |--------|----------------| | >20% | Significant upside expected | | 10-20% | Moderate upside | | 0-10% | Near fair value | | <0% | Downside risk | ## Analyst Coverage ### Coverage Levels | Analysts | Coverage Level | |----------|----------------| | 30+ | Heavily covered | | 15-30 | Well covered | | 5-15 | Moderate coverage | | <5 | Limited coverage | ### Coverage Implications | Level | Characteristics | |-------|-----------------| | Heavy | More consensus reliability | | Moderate | Good perspective diversity | | Light | Less reliable consensus | | Minimal | Limited institutional interest | ## Consensus Strength ### Evaluating Consensus | Factor | Strong Consensus | Weak Consensus | |--------|------------------|----------------| | Range | Tight (low to high) | Wide spread | | Recent Changes | Aligned direction | Mixed revisions | | Analyst Count | Many participants | Few analysts | ### Standard Deviation | Spread | Interpretation | |--------|----------------| | Narrow | High agreement | | Moderate | Normal debate | | Wide | Significant disagreement | ## Target Revisions ### Revision Trends | Pattern | Signal | |---------|--------| | Upgrades increasing | Improving outlook | | Downgrades increasing | Deteriorating outlook | | Mixed revisions | Uncertainty | | No changes | Status quo | ### Revision Triggers | Catalyst | Common Result | |----------|---------------| | Strong earnings | Target increases | | Weak earnings | Target decreases | | Guidance change | Aligned revision | | Sector news | Coordinated moves | ## Data Sources ### Common Publishers | Source | Description | |--------|-------------| | StreetInsider | Financial news aggregator | | TheFly | Real-time news | | Benzinga | Market intelligence | | Sell-side Firms | Investment bank research | ### Source Considerations | Factor | Note | |--------|------| | Timeliness | Recent targets more relevant | | Reputation | Weight by analyst track record | | Conflicts | Consider investment banking ties | | Methodology | Different valuation approaches | ## Common Use Cases ### Investment Decision ``` Should I buy AAPL based on analyst targets? ``` ### Valuation Check ``` Is MSFT overvalued relative to analyst expectations? ``` ### Sentiment Tracking ``` How has analyst sentiment on GOOGL changed this year? ``` ### Peer Comparison ``` Compare analyst targets for major cloud stocks. ``` ## Analysis Tips 1. **Compare to current price**: Calculate upside/downside potential. 2. **Track trend direction**: Rising or falling targets over time. 3. **Consider coverage**: More analysts = more reliable consensus. 4. **Check range**: Tight = agreement, wide = uncertainty. 5. **Time weight**: Recent targets more relevant. 6. **Use with fundamentals**: Targets are opinions, not facts. ## Integration with Other Skills | Skill | Combined Use | |-------|--------------| | stock-quote | Current price vs. target | | analyst-estimates | Targets + earnings expectations | | income-statement | Fundamentals behind targets | | stock-performance | Price trend vs. target evolution |