# Fictional example output

Unique daily cap ownership totals $700: shared1 $600 plus b3 $100. Summing three campaign rows to $1,300 would double count the shared budget.

c2 violates the supplied Channel-Intent naming convention. c1/c2 have the same supplied targeting summary; this flags a possible governance duplicate, not demonstrated self-competition or wasted spend. Verify query eligibility, keyword inventories, and objectives before consolidating.

Prepare a mapping of source IDs, proposed destination, budget owner, dependencies, and prior settings only after the intended cleanup is defined. Keep c3's separate brand role visible. Naming correction can be proposed independently of a structural merge; no performance uplift forecast is supportable. No renames, merges, or deletions were applied.