--- title: Verifying scoring calculations using the classic assessment engine description: You can review scores and risk ratings in your questionnaires to help ensure the accuracy and consistency of risk scoring by verifying the correct application of weights, normalized values, scoring methods, and risk rating scales. Based on the different weights you assign, Third-party Risk Management aggregates these values and produces a composite score. locale: en-US canonical_url: https://www.servicenow.com/docs/r/australia/governance-risk-compliance/third-party-risk-management/tprm-verif-q.html release: australia product: Third-party Risk Management classification: third-party-risk-management topic_type: concept last_updated: "2026-09-10" reading_time_minutes: 6 breadcrumb: [Scoring calculations using the classic assessment engine, Reference, Third-party Risk Management, Governance, Risk, and Compliance] --- # Verifying scoring calculations using the classic assessment engine You can review scores and risk ratings in your questionnaires to help ensure the accuracy and consistency of risk scoring by verifying the correct application of weights, normalized values, scoring methods, and risk rating scales. Based on the different weights you assign, Third-party Risk Management aggregates these values and produces a composite score. ## Verification checklist The \[sn\_vdr\_risk\_asmt.vendor\_assessor\] or \[sn\_vdr\_risk\_asmt.vendor\_manager\] role is required to perform all related actions by using the Vendor Management Workspace or VRM Classic user interface. For full descriptions of assessment configuration and set up, see [Classic assessment configuration](https://raw.githubusercontent.com/ServiceNow/ServiceNowDocs/australia/markdown/australia/governance-risk-compliance/third-party-risk-management/tprm-ongoing-config.md). Here are some of the configurations that you can check while reviewing scores and risk ratings:
| Configurations | Description |
|---|---|
| Scoring method | Verify that the correct scoring method has been selected. You can select or update scoring methods for risk area domains, risk area criteria, and component criteria. For example, confirm that Min Risk is used instead of Average Risk if that aligns better with your assessment goals. For more information, see [Define a third-party risk domain](https://raw.githubusercontent.com/ServiceNow/ServiceNowDocs/australia/markdown/australia/governance-risk-compliance/third-party-risk-management/tprm-risk-domain-define.md), [Define third-party risk area criteria](https://raw.githubusercontent.com/ServiceNow/ServiceNowDocs/australia/markdown/australia/governance-risk-compliance/third-party-risk-management/tprm-risk-domain-criteria-df.md), and [Define component criteria](https://raw.githubusercontent.com/ServiceNow/ServiceNowDocs/australia/markdown/australia/governance-risk-compliance/third-party-risk-management/tprm-component-criteria-define.md). |
| Weights | Verify the accuracy of weights applied to risk areas, risk criteria, risk components, and questions.You can apply custom weights to reflect the importance and priority of different types of risk. Weight values for questions must be whole integers. Using decimals results in incorrect scores. For example, use 56 and not 0.56. For more information on how to assign or update weights, see [Define a third-party risk domain](https://raw.githubusercontent.com/ServiceNow/ServiceNowDocs/australia/markdown/australia/governance-risk-compliance/third-party-risk-management/tprm-risk-domain-define.md), [Define third-party risk area criteria](https://raw.githubusercontent.com/ServiceNow/ServiceNowDocs/australia/markdown/australia/governance-risk-compliance/third-party-risk-management/tprm-risk-domain-criteria-df.md), [Define component criteria](https://raw.githubusercontent.com/ServiceNow/ServiceNowDocs/australia/markdown/australia/governance-risk-compliance/third-party-risk-management/tprm-component-criteria-define.md), and [Define a question](https://raw.githubusercontent.com/ServiceNow/ServiceNowDocs/australia/markdown/australia/governance-risk-compliance/third-party-risk-management/tprm-questions-create.md). |
| Scoring calculations | Verify that calculations, normalized values, and unanswered questions are behaving as expected. For example, confirm that you’re accounting for unanswered questions not being included as part of the scoring calculation. For information on the different formulas used to calculate scores and ratings, see [Scoring calculations using the classic assessment engine](https://raw.githubusercontent.com/ServiceNow/ServiceNowDocs/australia/markdown/australia/governance-risk-compliance/third-party-risk-management/vendor-ratings-scoring.md). For information on how to use normalized values to calculate assessment scores for Choice or Multiple Selection questions with the scored check box not selected [Normalize the scores for metrics](https://raw.githubusercontent.com/ServiceNow/ServiceNowDocs/australia/markdown/australia/governance-risk-compliance/third-party-risk-management/set-max-norm-input.md). |