--- name: deal-memo-writer description: "Write deal memos for PE acquisitions and CRE investments. Structure company/property overview, investment thesis, financial analysis, risks, and recommendation. Use when preparing deal memos, writing investment summaries, or documenting deal rationale." --- # /deal-memo-writer -- Deal Memo Writer Write structured deal memos for PE acquisitions and CRE investments. > Before executing, read `_shared/plugin-context.md` for Nexus domain vocabulary, MCP tool references, and quality standards. ## Prerequisites **Required**: Deal data -- either from MCP tools or provided manually (financials, company/property info, market context). **Optional MCP Connections** (enhance automation): - **Nexus MCP** (`nexus.syntari-ai.com/api/mcp`) -- `nexus_get_deal`, `nexus_run_model` for deal data and financial model outputs - **BigData.com MCP** (via `financial-analysis` plugin) -- company tearsheets, financials, SEC filings for research - **PitchBook MCP** -- comparable transactions, market sizing - **S&P Global / Kensho MCP** -- Capital IQ financial data **Graceful Degradation**: If MCP tools are not connected, provide deal details manually. Paste financials, upload documents, or describe the deal in conversation. The memo structure and analytical frameworks work identically with manual input. ## When to Use - Documenting a deal for IC review - Creating a preliminary deal summary after initial screening - Writing up deal rationale after first-round diligence - Generating CRE investment memos with property-specific analysis - Preparing a condensed one-pager for deal committee - Converting raw deal data into formatted investment narrative ## Memo Structure ### Executive Summary (1 page) - Deal overview: target, sector, size, structure - Key thesis points (3-4 bullets) - Headline financial metrics - Recommendation (proceed/pass/more diligence) ### Company/Property Overview (1-2 pages) - Business description / property description - History and key milestones - Market position and competitive landscape - Management team / tenant roster ### Investment Thesis (1-2 pages) - Market opportunity and TAM - Competitive advantage / moat - Value creation plan - Return expectations - Key risks and mitigants ### Financial Analysis (2-3 pages) - Historical financial performance - Pro forma projections - Return analysis (IRR, MOIC for PE; cap rate, cash yield for CRE) - Sensitivity tables - Comparable transactions ### Risk Assessment (1 page) - Key risks with severity rating (Critical / High / Medium / Low) - Mitigation strategies - Downside scenario analysis ### Recommendation & Next Steps - Clear recommendation with supporting rationale - Conditions or open items - Timeline for next steps ## Data Shapes ### Deal Memo ```typescript interface DealMemo { dealName: string dealType: 'pe_acquisition' | 'cre_investment' status: 'draft' | 'review' | 'approved' | 'rejected' sections: { executiveSummary: string companyOverview: string investmentThesis: string financialAnalysis: string riskAssessment: string recommendation: string } financials: { enterpriseValue?: number // PE: total enterprise value equity?: number // PE: equity check size irr?: number // Projected IRR (%) moic?: number // Projected MOIC (x) capRate?: number // CRE: going-in cap rate (%) noi?: number // CRE: net operating income ($) } createdBy: string createdAt: string } ``` ## Workflow ### Step 1: Gather All Inputs - **With Nexus MCP**: Use `nexus_get_deal` to pull deal data. Use `nexus_run_model` for financial model outputs. - **With BigData.com MCP**: Use `bigdata_company_tearsheet` for target company profiles and financials. - **Without MCP**: Collect deal data, financial analysis, market research, and diligence findings from the user. ### Step 2: Draft Each Section Write with professional analytical tone, data-driven assertions, balanced risk perspective. ### Step 3: Financial Tables Format all financial data with monospaced font, consistent decimals, proper currency formatting. Use `Intl.NumberFormat` conventions ($X.XM, X.Xx for multiples, X.X% for percentages). ### Step 4: Review Cross-check all figures, ensure internal consistency, verify market data citations. ## Sample Output ``` ======================================================= CONFIDENTIAL -- INVESTMENT MEMORANDUM ======================================================= Target: Meridian Data Solutions, Inc. Sector: Enterprise Software (Data Infrastructure) Structure: Control Buyout (85% equity) EV: $420M (8.2x LTM EBITDA) Sponsor: SVP Growth Equity Fund IV EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ----------------- Meridian Data Solutions is a mission-critical data infrastructure platform serving 340+ enterprise clients across financial services and healthcare. We recommend proceeding to final diligence based on: 1. 92% recurring revenue with 118% NRR -- best-in-class retention 2. $2.1B TAM growing 14% CAGR -- significant whitespace 3. EBITDA margin expansion opportunity: 38% -> 48% via sales efficiency 4. Platform stickiness: <2% annual logo churn, 18-month implementation RETURN ANALYSIS ----------------- Base Upside Downside Entry EV/EBITDA 8.2x 8.2x 8.2x Exit EV/EBITDA 10.0x 11.5x 8.0x Revenue CAGR 12% 16% 8% EBITDA Margin 48% 52% 42% Gross IRR 28.4% 35.1% 14.2% Net IRR 23.1% 29.6% 10.8% MOIC 2.8x 3.5x 1.8x RECOMMENDATION: PROCEED to Phase II diligence > Outstanding items: management reference calls, IT security audit > Timeline: 4 weeks to final IC presentation ======================================================= ``` ## Workflow Chain This skill is step 3 in the PE deal chain: `/deal-screener` -> **`/deal-memo-writer`** -> `/financial-modeling`. Also participates in document analysis and autonomous diligence chains. ## Related Skills - `/deal-screener` -- Screen and score deals before memo writing - `/financial-modeling` -- LBO, DCF, M&A models to support deal memo financial analysis - `/om-parser` -- Parse CRE offering memorandums for property deal data - `/cre-underwriter` -- Full CRE underwriting model for CRE investment memos - `/competitive-analysis` -- Competitor analysis for the market position section ## Confidence Calibration Every deal memo must include a calibrated confidence assessment: ``` ## Confidence Assessment - **Score**: 0.XX (0.0 = no confidence, 1.0 = full confidence) - **Calibration**: conservative | neutral | optimistic - **Confidence Drivers**: [what supports the score -- e.g., "audited financials available", "management meetings completed", "multiple data sources cross-referenced"] - **Data Gaps**: [what's missing that would improve confidence -- e.g., "no customer reference calls", "industry comps limited to 3 transactions"] ``` **Three-pass calibration**: Generate analysis from conservative, neutral, and optimistic perspectives. High consistency across passes = high confidence. Divergence = flag for human review. Typical confidence ranges: - **0.85+**: Full diligence materials, audited financials, management access, market data confirmed - **0.65-0.84**: Preliminary diligence, unaudited financials, limited management interaction - **0.40-0.64**: Screening-stage data only, significant assumptions required - **Below 0.40**: Insufficient data for a credible memo -- request additional information before drafting