{
  "@context": {
    "CIP100": "https://github.com/cardano-foundation/CIPs/blob/master/CIP-0100/README.md#",
    "hashAlgorithm": "CIP100:hashAlgorithm",
    "body": {
      "@id": "CIP100:body",
      "@context": {
        "references": {
          "@id": "CIP100:references",
          "@container": "@set",
          "@context": {
            "GovernanceMetadata": "CIP100:GovernanceMetadataReference",
            "Other": "CIP100:OtherReference",
            "label": "CIP100:reference-label",
            "uri": "CIP100:reference-uri",
            "referenceHash": {
              "@id": "CIP100:referenceHash",
              "@context": {
                "hashDigest": "CIP100:hashDigest",
                "hashAlgorithm": "CIP100:hashAlgorithm"
              }
            }
          }
        },
        "comment": "CIP100:comment",
        "externalUpdates": {
          "@id": "CIP100:externalUpdates",
          "@context": {
            "title": "CIP100:update-title",
            "uri": "CIP100:uri"
          }
        }
      }
    },
    "authors": {
      "@id": "CIP100:authors",
      "@container": "@set",
      "@context": {
        "name": "http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/name",
        "witness": {
          "@id": "CIP100:witness",
          "@context": {
            "witnessAlgorithm": "CIP100:witnessAlgorithm",
            "publicKey": "CIP100:publicKey",
            "signature": "CIP100:signature"
          }
        }
      }
    }
  },
  "authors": [],
  "body": {
    "comment": "TL;DR: EDC voted NO on gov_action1ypajyms3pcfmkx93r87dxy6jpc8u6pst90ylhxj7t0rwjj43puasq0x9jrw;\n\nProcess of going through the changes:\n\nGeneral: Have an LLM check the grammar and spelling, please; e.g. Block vs block, missing spaces after commas etc.\n\n- 24 Delegated Representative (DRep). The individual or entity registered to vote with respect to on-chain governance actions for its own behalf or on behalf of other owners of ada.\n+ 24 Delegated Representative (DRep). The individual or entity registered to vote with respect to on-chain governance actions for its own behalf or on behalf of other Ada Holders.\n\n- 26 Net Change Limit. Means the maximum amount or percentage by which the Cardano Treasury may not be reduced by in a given period.\n+ 26 Net Change Limit. Means the maximum allowed amount of Lovelace removed from the Cardano Treasury in a given period.\n\n- 28 Stake Pool Operator (SPO). An individual or entity that manifests intent through the signed transactions of a Stake Pool.\n+ 28 Stake Pool Operator (SPO). An individual or entity who directly controls the cold key(s) to a Cardano block producing node.\n\n30 Block(s) vs block(s)\n\n87 - Three independent voting bodies - DReps, SPOs, and the CC - participate in on-chain voting; anyone holding multiple roles must publicly disclose such overlaps before engaging in any on-chain governance actions.\n--- This is not enforcable. An anonymous DRep could also be an anonymous SPO.\n\n>>> Now leaning towards ABSTAIN.\n\n92 - DReps may vote on all types of governance actions.\n--- A bit of a non-sensical one. While they can vote on everything, hardforks are not determined by them.\n\n94 - DReps shall ensure that any compensation received in connection with their activities as a DRep is publicly disclosed in a timely manner through relevant governance communication channels.\n--- Again, not enforcable. What do you want to do, if you find out a DRep did not disclose it? Ban them by ledger rule?\n\n95 - DReps shall not offer or provide compensation to an Ada Holder or in exchange for being appointed as a DRep or for voting on their behalf.\n--- Again, not enforcable. Same as 94.\n\n101 - SPOs shall publicly disclose if they are simultaneously voting as a DRep on the same governance actions.\n--- This is not enforcable. An anonymous DRep could also be an anonymous SPO. \n\n>>> Now leaning towards NO.\n\n103 vs 99. Almost same content, can that be shortened?\n\n106 - ... The document hosted by such a URL shall be immutable in nature and incapable of being altered after submission of the proposed governance action for on-chain voting.\n--- This reduces the hosting options dramatically. As long as the hash is correct and the document wasn't altered, the action should be valid.\n\n135  - Treasury Withdrawal Recipients shall use treasury withdrawals for the purpose set out in Section 7, paragraph 1 above.\n--- Makes no sense.\n\n- 148 - ... owners of ada.\n+ 148 - ... Ada Holders.\n\n153 - ... no confidence will result.\n--- No proper English.\n\n357/359/1141 ada holders vs Ada Holders. (It's a definition and should be capitalized). Please check 'owners of ada' and 'ada holders' in the whole document and replace it with Ada Holders."
  },
  "hashAlgorithm": "blake2b-256"
}