# New light shed on Otero epithet case; Officials, students clarify circumstances ## Sources say sophomore Ehrman did not make comments ### New sources have come forward indicating that sophomore Michael Ehrman did not make homophobic remarks directed at Otero Resident Fellow Dennis Matthies, as was reported in The Daily in articles on Monday and Tuesday. The Daily regrets the error. One of the students at Otero on the night of Jan. 19, Bret Scher, said yesterday that Ehrman "never opened his mouth." Scher had not been implicated in the incident. In a letter given to The Daily on Jan. 31, Dean of Students Michael Jackson described an incident involving three students. "[W]hen they reached the RF cottage they yelled: 'Fag got! You are going to die of AIDS. You're going to get what's coming to you, you're going to get what's coming to you. Damn faggot!" But Jackson said last night, "The first two guys (Scher and Ehrman) basically said they didn't say anything." "I'm not sure if what they said [to Rickfordl is the truth,"he said. Judicial Affairs Officer Sally Cole said Mon day the decision to make the incident public came after extended discussion by University officials. She said, "I hope people view it as a positive example of appropriate ways to respond to offensive conduct that cannot be regulated by a judicial process." Jackson said last night that the Universi ty's investigation failed to determine exactly who said what during the incident. The Daily reported on Monday that William Shepherd, the head advising associate in Otero, said, "I watched the three of them walk ... to Madera. The entire time, one of them continued to scream comments, including, 'Faggot! Hope you die of AIDS'... Shepherd said that he made it clear to Uni versity officials when he was contacted by them that he had "no idea who said what." First-year law student Keith Rabois, who was part of the group of three students, said one of them said things "reasonably close" to Jackson's description of the statements. Rabois told The Daily Sunday night the comments were "mostly about faggots being bad in general." "I'm a first-year law student," Rabois said. "I know exactly what you can say and what you can't." Flyers were posted at the Law School Mon day night that showed a crossed-out picture of Rabois, along with the words "Homophobia is Ugly." The flyers have since been taken down. A poster also circulated among the law stu dents, inviting them to write comments. Almost all of the comments expressed anger or embarrass ment. Several law students said yes terday that they acknowledged free speech rights, but said com ments like the epithets had no place at the University. "We're just generally out raged," said second-year law stu dent Tim Teter. The incident has raised ques tions about the controversial Grey interpretation of the Funda mental Standard, which limits certain kinds of offensive speech. For several reasons, the inter pretation was not relevant to the comments made Jan. 19. The most important reason was that Matthies was not home at the time the student made the homophobic comments, as had previously been thought. The speech code only prohibits face-to face discriminatory harassment intended to injure an individual. Jackson's letter to The Daily said the epithets were "mostly directed at the Resident Fellow." He did not note that Matthies was not home at the time the remarks were made. Even if Matthies was home, the comments could not have led to a successful University prose cution because the code only pro hibits speech between students, not between a student and a fac ulty member, according to the Grey interpretation. Judicial Affairs Officer Sally Cole said the "ambiguity" in the interpretation needs to be "clari fied" and that she and Jackson will send a report about the situa tion to Kennedy. Cole said she wasn't sure whether the interpretation had been intended to be limited to stu dents only. "When it was legislat ed in 1990 by the [Student Con duct Legislative Council], the issue just never came up," she said.