# Objection Log — Blank Template Track objections during a hearing. ``` PROCEEDING: [style of cause] DATE: [YYYY-MM-DD] JUDGE / ARBITRATOR: [name] TIME | WITNESS | STATEMENT / EVIDENCE | OBJECTION | RULING | NOTES ─────┼─────────┼──────────────────────┼───────────┼────────┼────── | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | ``` ## Common Objection Vocabulary ### Hearsay "Objection, hearsay." "Objection, hearsay — no exception applies and the principled test is not met because [X]." ### Relevance "Objection, relevance." "Objection, the question calls for evidence not relevant to any issue in this proceeding." ### Beyond Scope "Objection, this exceeds the scope of direct." "Objection, this exceeds the pleading." ### Argumentative "Objection, argumentative." "Objection, counsel is arguing with the witness." ### Compound Question "Objection, compound question." ### Leading (on direct) "Objection, leading question on direct examination." ### Speculation "Objection, calls for speculation." ### Improper Character Evidence "Objection, this is character evidence not going to any recognized purpose." ### Improper Opinion "Objection, lay opinion outside the recognized categories." ### Improper Expert Opinion "Objection, this witness is not qualified to give this opinion." "Objection, this opinion exceeds the scope of the expert's qualifications / disclosed opinions." ### Privilege "Objection, privileged. This calls for solicitor-client privileged communication." ### Ambiguity "Objection, ambiguous — I cannot determine what the witness is being asked." ### Asked and Answered "Objection, asked and answered." ### Assumes Facts Not in Evidence "Objection, the question assumes a fact not established in evidence." ## Objection Discipline - Object at the time — waiting waives - State the specific ground - Do not argue the objection unless invited - Once ruled on, comply with the ruling and preserve the record - If necessary, request that the record reflect the ruling ## After the Hearing For each ruling against you: - Note it in this log - Consider whether it's grounds for appeal or JR - Rulings on questions of law are more likely to be appealable than rulings on weight