# AI Automated Decision-Making Assessment Template ## Organisation: Cerebrum AI Labs --- ## SECTION 1: AI DECISION SYSTEM IDENTIFICATION | Field | Value | |-------|-------| | System Name | | | Description | | | Category | Credit / Employment / Healthcare / Public Admin / Insurance / Education / Other | | Data Subjects Affected | | | Monthly Decision Volume | | | Assessment Date | | --- ## SECTION 2: ART. 22 APPLICABILITY ### 2.1 Is There a Decision? | Question | Response | |----------|----------| | Does the AI output directly determine an outcome? | Yes / No | | Or is it advisory input for a human decision? | Advisory / Determinative | ### 2.2 Is the Decision Solely Automated? | Question | Response | |----------|----------| | Is there human involvement in the decision chain? | Yes / No | | If yes, does the reviewer have authority to change the decision? | Yes / No | | Does the reviewer have domain expertise? | Yes / No | | Does the reviewer have all relevant information? | Yes / No | | Is sufficient time allocated for review? | Yes / No | | Does the reviewer exercise genuine discretion? | Yes / No | | What is the override rate? | ___% | | **Determination**: Is the decision solely automated? | Yes / No | ### 2.3 Legal or Significant Effects? | Effect Type | Applicable? | Description | |-------------|------------|-------------| | Legal effects | Yes / No | | | Access to services | Yes / No | | | Financial impact | Yes / No | | | Health/safety impact | Yes / No | | | Freedom/autonomy | Yes / No | | | **Determination**: Legal or significant effects? | Yes / No | ### 2.4 Art. 22 Conclusion | | | |---|---| | **Art. 22 triggered?** | Yes / No | | If yes, exception relied upon | Art. 22(2)(a) Contract / (b) Law / (c) Consent / None | | Special category data used? | Yes / No | | If yes, Art. 22(4) condition | Art. 9(2)(a) / Art. 9(2)(g) | --- ## SECTION 3: HUMAN OVERSIGHT ASSESSMENT | Element | Assessment | |---------|------------| | Oversight level | HITL / HOTL / HIC / Autonomous | | Reviewer authority to override | Yes / No | | Reviewer domain competence | Yes / No | | Reviewer access to all information | Yes / No | | Sufficient time for review | Yes / No | | Reviewer exercises discretion | Yes / No | | Override rate | ___% | | Average review time | ___ seconds | | Daily volume per reviewer | ___ decisions | | Automation bias countermeasures | Yes / No — Describe: | | Training provided | Yes / No | | Monitoring dashboard | Yes / No | | **Effectiveness determination** | Effective / Nominal / Insufficient / Absent | --- ## SECTION 4: CONTESTATION MECHANISM (Art. 22(3)) | Element | Assessment | |---------|------------| | Contestation mechanism exists | Yes / No | | Mechanism is accessible | Yes / No | | Response timeframe | ___ days | | Independent reviewer assigned | Yes / No | | Data subject can submit evidence | Yes / No | | Written outcome provided | Yes / No | | Further appeal options indicated | Yes / No | | Contestation rate | ___% | | Overturn rate | ___% | | **Contestation compliant?** | Yes / No | --- ## SECTION 5: ART. 22(3) SAFEGUARDS | Safeguard | Implemented? | Details | |-----------|-------------|---------| | Right to human intervention | Yes / No | | | Right to express point of view | Yes / No | | | Right to contest the decision | Yes / No | | | Explanation of decision provided | Yes / No | | | Notification of automated decision | Yes / No | | --- ## SECTION 6: RISK ASSESSMENT | Factor | Assessment | |--------|------------| | Art. 22 triggered without valid exception | Yes / No | | Human oversight insufficient | Yes / No | | Contestation mechanism non-compliant | Yes / No | | Special category data without Art. 22(4) | Yes / No | | High decision volume | Yes / No | | Vulnerable data subjects | Yes / No | | **Overall Risk Level** | Low / Medium / High / Critical | --- ## SECTION 7: REMEDIATION ACTIONS | # | Action | Priority | Owner | Deadline | Status | |---|--------|----------|-------|----------|--------| | 1 | | | | | | | 2 | | | | | | --- ## SECTION 8: APPROVAL | Role | Name | Date | |------|------|------| | System Owner | | | | DPO | | | | Legal Counsel | | | **Next Review**: _______________