# Dispute resolution ## The ODR platform is gone. Delete every reference to it. The EU Online Dispute Resolution platform was shut down by **Regulation (EU) 2024/3228**; operation ended **20 July 2025**. A link to `ec.europa.eu/consumers/odr` is today a dead link presented to consumers as a right they can exercise, which is itself a misleading commercial practice risk under artt. 20-22 Codice del Consumo. Rules that follow from this and admit no exception: - if an existing text, footer, order confirmation email, shop plugin or PDF terms mentions the *piattaforma ODR*, *piattaforma europea di risoluzione delle controversie online*, or links `ec.europa.eu/consumers/odr`, it is **removed**, not rewritten - never re-add it, whatever an Italian shop template, a plugin default or a stale guide says - search the whole project, not just the terms page: `odr`, `consumers/odr`, `risoluzione delle controversie online`, `piattaforma europea` - replace it with a reference to a real, currently operating ADR body — or with nothing, if the trader is not bound to one ## Italian ADR framework **Codice del Consumo (D.Lgs 6 settembre 2005 n. 206), Parte V Titolo II-bis, articles 141 to 141-decies**, inserted by **D.Lgs 6 agosto 2015 n. 130** transposing Directive 2013/11/EU. Status as at 2026-08-05, confirmed on mimit.gov.it. Eight authorities keep the registers (*elenchi*) of accredited ADR bodies, split by sector: | Authority | Sector | |---|---| | Ministero delle Imprese e del Made in Italy (MIMIT) | general consumer disputes | | Ministero della Giustizia | organismi di mediazione | | CONSOB | financial markets | | IVASS | insurance | | ARERA | energy, water, waste | | AGCOM | electronic communications | | Banca d'Italia | banking and credit | | ART | transport | Practical consequence: "the ADR body" is not one national institution. Which body is competent depends on the sector, and for a general online shop it is an ADR body listed by MIMIT — not an authority the trader gets to name freely. Instruments in practice: - **conciliazione paritetica** — a negotiated procedure run jointly by a company and consumer associations under a protocol. Only available if the trader has signed such a protocol. A trader that has not signed one must not claim it. - **mediazione** before an organismo registered with the Ministero della Giustizia, often hosted at a **Camera di Commercio**. The Camere di Commercio also run consumer conciliation services. - **arbitrato** — binding, and for that reason not something to impose on a consumer in standard terms. ## Information duty Article **49 comma 1** Codice del Consumo requires the trader, before a distance contract is concluded, to inform the consumer of the possibility of recourse to an out-of-court complaint and redress mechanism to which the trader is subject, and how to access it. [[UNVERIFIED: the exact lettera of art. 49 comma 1 carrying this item, and the exact comma of art. 141-sexies obliging a trader that adheres to an ADR body to state that on its website and in its general terms. The range 141 to 141-decies and D.Lgs 130/2015 were confirmed on mimit.gov.it; the sub-numbering was not. Verify on normattiva.it before citing a lettera or comma in an output.]] Two positions, and only two: 1. **The trader adheres to an ADR body.** Name the body, give its address and website, and state how the consumer starts the procedure. Do this on the site and in the general terms. 2. **The trader adheres to no ADR body.** Say so plainly, point to the ordinary courts and to the consumer's forum rule. Do not invent an adherence to sound compliant. ## Consumer forum For a consumer contract the competent court is the one of the consumer's place of residence or elected domicile — a mandatory rule of Italian consumer law. A choice-of-forum clause in standard terms fixing the trader's seat is **vessatoria** and unenforceable against the consumer (unfair terms regime, artt. 33 ff Codice del Consumo). Do not write "Foro competente in via esclusiva: [[città della sede]]" into B2C terms. It reads as authoritative, it is void, and the clause itself is an unfair-practice exposure. ## Template — clause for general terms ```html
I reclami possono essere inviati a [[indirizzo]]. Rispondiamo entro [[termine]] giorni dal ricevimento.
Per la risoluzione stragiudiziale delle controversie il consumatore può rivolgersi a [[denominazione dell'organismo ADR]], iscritto nell'elenco tenuto da [[autorità competente]], con sede in [[indirizzo]], sito web [[URL]]. La procedura si avvia [[modalità]].
[[Denominazione]] non aderisce ad alcun organismo di risoluzione extragiudiziale delle controversie. Resta impregiudicato il diritto del consumatore di rivolgersi all'autorità giudiziaria ordinaria.
Il contratto è regolato dalla legge italiana. Restano applicabili le disposizioni imperative più favorevoli previste dalla legge del Paese di residenza abituale del consumatore. Per le controversie con i consumatori è competente il giudice del luogo di residenza o di domicilio eletto del consumatore.
``` ## Checkpoints - [ ] Project-wide search for `odr`, `consumers/odr`, `risoluzione delle controversie online`, `piattaforma europea` returns nothing — including shop plugin templates and transactional emails - [ ] The ADR position is one of the two honest variants, not an invented adherence - [ ] If a body is named, it is actually on the register of the competent authority - [ ] Complaint address is a monitored inbox with a stated response time - [ ] No exclusive forum clause at the trader's seat in B2C terms - [ ] Choice-of-law clause preserves mandatory consumer protections of the consumer's country - [ ] No arbitration clause imposed on consumers - [ ] All `[[…]]` placeholders resolved or reported as open