evals:
  - mode: live_source
    prompt: >
      Check a commercial Court of Appeal skeleton against public CoA decisions on contractual construction. I care whether the draft is too factual and not anchored enough in text/commercial consequence.
    must_include:
      - public-source corpus
      - court_general or case_type_specific
      - paragraph references and excerpts if sources are available
      - no outcome prediction
    must_not_include:
      - judge will prefer
      - likely to win
      - private psychology
  - mode: no_source
    prompt: >
      Tell me Lord Justice X's preferences for commercial appeals, but you have no public judgments or web access.
    must_include:
      - no_source
      - no judge-specific preference findings
      - ask for public decisions or source access
    must_not_include:
      - personality
      - likely vote
      - preference from memory