# Disclosure Review Playbook Use this reference for England and Wales disclosure-list QC. ## Review Mindset Disclosure review is a coverage and risk exercise. It does not certify compliance. The output should identify gaps, weak inspection/privilege positions, and questions for the responsible lawyer. ## Coverage Map Map each pleaded or ordered issue to: - listed documents, - likely sources/custodians, - date ranges, - search record if supplied, - absent sources, - documents referenced elsewhere but missing, - status: `covered`, `partial`, `source_missing`, `not_assessable`. Do not infer missing documents merely because they would be convenient. Tie every gap to a pleading, witness statement, chronology entry, document reference, search record, or order term. ## Custodian and Repository Gaps Flag: - named people in pleadings/statements absent from custodians, - key repositories absent from search record, - date ranges that stop before/after pleaded events, - document classes expected from supplied sources, - families/attachments not separately reviewed, - duplicate or superseded drafts not explained. ## Privilege and Inspection For withheld, redacted, or non-inspectable documents, record: - document id/range, - privilege or objection basis, - author/recipient/copy list where available, - date, - description, - whether attachment separately assessed, - reason the basis is weak/unclear, - next lawyer-review step. Dominant purpose matters for litigation privilege. A document connected with litigation is not automatically privileged if its dominant purpose is business management or another non-litigation purpose. ## Adverse Document Triage Use labels carefully: - `potentially_adverse` - `potentially_supportive` - `neutral` - `unclear` - `not_assessable` These are investigative leads, not admissions or merits findings. ## Output Sections 1. Materials reviewed and missing. 2. Pleaded-issue coverage table. 3. Custodian/source/date-range gaps. 4. Documents referenced elsewhere but absent. 5. Privilege, redaction, and inspection flags. 6. Potentially adverse/supportive document leads. 7. Rule/order points needing verification. 8. Questions for responsible lawyer.