# Example Output ## Scenario User asks: "Review these draft Particulars of Claim for an E&W contract claim before counsel sees them." Access state: user-supplied source mode. Claude has the draft PoC, contract, two key emails, and a chronology. No current CPR source has been retrieved. ## Good Output Shape ```yaml access_mode: user_supplied_source pleading_reviewed: "Draft Particulars of Claim v3" rule_status: cpr_pd16: verify_current_rule pre_action_protocol: verify_current_rule element_map: cause_of_action: breach_of_contract law_basis: "User-supplied pleading theory; verify_current_law" elements: - element: "Contract formation / parties" pleaded_facts: "Paras 3-5 identify the parties and agreement date." source: "Contract front page and signature block" gap: "" - element: "Term relied on" pleaded_facts: "Para 9 pleads clause 4 delivery obligation." source: "Contract clause 4" gap: "" - element: "Breach" pleaded_facts: "Para 15 alleges delivery occurred five days late." source: "Email AB-004; delivery record missing" gap: "Delivery record needed to prove actual delivery date." - element: "Loss caused by breach" pleaded_facts: "Para 21 pleads loss generally." source: source_missing gap: "No pleaded causal route from delay to claimed losses." issues: - paragraph: 21 severity: major confidence: high issue: "Loss is not particularised." rule_or_source_checked: "Draft and supplied documents only; CPR/PD16 to verify." next_step: "Add heads of loss, amounts or method of calculation, and source documents." - paragraph: 24 severity: critical confidence: medium issue: "Interest claimed but no basis/rate/period pleaded." rule_or_source_checked: verify_current_rule next_step: "Confirm statutory/contractual basis and plead period." questions_for_lawyer: - "Is there a standstill agreement or limitation issue not shown in the draft?" - "Is specific performance sought, or damages only?" ``` ## Bad Output To Avoid ```text The claim is viable. ``` This skill reviews pleading structure and gaps; it does not certify merits.