# CCP Classification Scratchpad

**Document**: [filename]
**Date Analysed**: [date]
**Document Type**: [Case / Judgment / Policy Document / Other]

---

## Classification

**Category**: [as an offence / as a defence (allowed) / as a defence (rejected) / as a defence / as a remedy / as offence and remedy / as defence and remedy / irrelevant / unsure / neutral]

**Explanation/Note**: [One precise, concise sentence explaining why this classification was reached. If anything is unclear, weird, not mentioned, or only implied rather than explicit, state that here.]

**Reference** (verbatim paragraph(s) from source):
> [Paste the full relevant paragraph(s) verbatim here. These are the passages on which the classification is based.]

---

## Uncertainty Flags

- [ ] None — classification is clear and explicit
- [ ] Implicit treatment only (CCP treatment implied, not explicitly stated)
- [ ] Unsure — reason: [explain]
- [ ] Case/judgment: difficult to distinguish party arguments from court/authority decision
- [ ] Other: [explain]

---

## Relevant CCP Paragraphs (working notes)

List ALL paragraphs in the document that mention CCPs, with a brief annotation on each:

1. **Para [X] / Page [Y]**: "[short excerpt]"
   - Annotation: [who is speaking? party argument or court/authority decision? what role does CCP play here?]

2. **Para [X] / Page [Y]**: "[short excerpt]"
   - Annotation: [...]

<!-- Add more as needed -->