--- name: client-intake-summary title: Client Intake Summary description: Produces a structured corporate-client intake brief from intake forms, consultation notes, and initial communications. Use when onboarding a new corporate matter, processing an intake packet, summarizing consult notes, running a conflict check, or triaging deadlines for a corporate governance matter. author: CaseMark author_url: https://github.com/CaseMark/skills/tree/main/skills/legal/client-intake-summary license: Apache-2.0 version: 0.1.0 execution_mode: open jurisdiction: general practice: corporate language: en --- # Client Intake Summary Converts raw intake materials into an evidence-tagged, team-ready brief for attorney review and matter activation. ## Prerequisites Gather before starting: - **Intake packet**: forms, engagement data, identity/contact details, entity structure - **Communications**: emails, call/meeting notes, preliminary documents - **Jurisdiction cues**: governing state, filing location, corporate governing documents - **Conflict inputs**: firm CRM/conflict database or prior-representation list (or note that none was available) - **Fee framework**: hourly/flat expectations, retainer status, billing constraints, payor source - **Time-sensitive facts**: deadlines, hearings, board dates, contract expirations - **Scope notes**: permission and confidentiality scope for each source document ## Quick Start 1. Collect and tag all source documents. 2. Run conflict/ethics check (or note gap). 3. Draft the brief using the section order and template below. 4. Mark every unknown field `Unknown` and every unverified legal point `[VERIFY]`. 5. Route to assigning attorney with urgency classification. ## Output Sections Produce in this fixed order: | Section | Content | Format | |---|---|---| | Executive Overview | 2–3 sentences: matter, client objective, urgency | Plain text | | Client Profile | Names, roles, contacts, communication prefs, confidentiality sensitivity | Bulleted fields | | Matter Snapshot | Type, legal issue, key parties, factual timeline, status, governing entities | Chronological table | | Preliminary Legal Considerations | Governing law cues, implied claims, jurisdiction questions, privilege/authority risks, SOL flags | Checklist | | Financial Notes | Fee discussion, retainer, budget constraints, funding source, billing risk | Bullets; standardize dollar amounts | | Risks and Red Flags | Inconsistencies, credibility issues, unrealistic outcomes, complexity indicators | Risk table (Low/Med/High) | | Conflicts and Ethics | Conflict search status, adverse-party overlap, confidentiality conflicts, privilege boundaries | Status table | | Follow-Up Queue | Missing facts, documents, and answers needed | Numbered action list | | Immediate Next Steps | 24h actions, 7-day actions, owner, dependency | Prioritized checklist | ### Header Template ```text Client: Matter ID: Matter Type: Jurisdiction: Intake Sources: Date Received: Status: New / Pending / Urgent ``` ## Core Drafting Rules 1. **Facts vs. inferences** — every `Fact` row must cite at least one source. 2. **Dates** — use `YYYY-MM-DD` throughout. 3. **Client quotes** — preserve only when materially relevant. 4. **Names** — verify spellings against source materials; do not over-edit. 5. **Uncertainty** — flag with `[VERIFY]` and list what must be checked. 6. **Order** — address conflict/confidentiality posture before legal merits. ## Pitfalls and Checks - **No legal advice.** Tone is internal and professional; no counseling recommendations. - **Urgency required.** Every brief must classify as `Immediate`, `This Week`, or `Routine`. - **SOL / filing deadlines.** If mentioned, include the governing trigger rule + `[VERIFY]` for jurisdiction-specific requirements. - **No fabricated timelines.** Missing dates go in the Follow-Up Queue, not invented. - **Confidentiality.** Avoid unnecessary sensitive disclosures in shared summaries. - **Corporate governance.** Capture entity authority limits, board/committee roles, and document governance references. - **Closing line.** End with: recommended assignment owner, recommended first task, and estimated start date.