# Privacy Design Pattern Workflows ## Workflow 1: Pattern Selection for a New System Design ``` Step 1: Processing Activity Analysis ├── Document the processing activity, purpose, and lawful basis ├── Identify all personal data categories involved ├── Map data flows (collection, processing, storage, sharing, deletion) ├── Identify data subjects and their expectations └── Classify data sensitivity (direct identifiers, quasi-identifiers, special categories) Step 2: GDPR Principle Mapping ├── For each GDPR principle (Art. 5), rate relevance to this activity (1-5) ├── Identify the primary GDPR risks (e.g., over-collection, purpose creep, unauthorized access) ├── Map risks to privacy design strategies using the principle-pattern matrix └── Identify mandatory patterns (those addressing high-risk principles) Step 3: Pattern Applicability Scoring ├── For each of the eight patterns, score applicability (1-5): │ ├── MINIMIZE: Can data collection or retention be reduced? │ ├── HIDE: Can data be encrypted, pseudonymized, or masked? │ ├── SEPARATE: Can processing be distributed or isolated by purpose? │ ├── ABSTRACT: Can data be aggregated or generalized? │ ├── INFORM: How should data subjects be notified? │ ├── CONTROL: What controls should data subjects have? │ ├── ENFORCE: What policies need technical enforcement? │ └── DEMONSTRATE: What compliance evidence is needed? ├── Identify the top 3-5 patterns for this activity └── Document selection rationale Step 4: Pattern Implementation Design ├── For each selected pattern, specify: │ ├── Which sub-pattern(s) apply │ ├── Where in the architecture the pattern is applied │ ├── Technical implementation approach │ ├── Responsible team │ └── Verification criteria ├── Document in the system design specification └── Review with DPO and security architecture team Step 5: Implementation and Verification ├── Implement patterns in the system architecture ├── Verify each pattern against its criteria ├── Conduct privacy architecture review ├── Update DPIA with pattern analysis └── Document in Article 30 records ``` ## Workflow 2: Pattern-Based Privacy Architecture Review ``` Step 1: Inventory Existing Patterns ├── For each processing activity, identify currently implemented patterns ├── Map each pattern to the GDPR principle it addresses ├── Identify gaps: principles without corresponding pattern implementation └── Document findings in pattern coverage matrix Step 2: Gap Analysis ├── For each unaddressed GDPR principle: │ ├── Determine the applicable privacy design pattern │ ├── Assess implementation feasibility │ ├── Estimate implementation effort │ └── Prioritize by risk (likelihood × impact of principle violation) ├── Generate prioritized remediation backlog └── Review with DPO for risk acceptance decisions Step 3: Remediation Implementation ├── Execute remediation backlog in priority order ├── For each pattern implementation: │ ├── Design the technical solution │ ├── Implement and test │ ├── Verify against pattern criteria │ └── Document in architecture records ├── Update pattern coverage matrix └── Re-run gap analysis to confirm closure Step 4: Continuous Monitoring ├── Schedule quarterly pattern coverage reviews ├── Trigger review when new processing activities are added ├── Trigger review when system architecture changes ├── Include pattern analysis in DPIA updates └── Report pattern coverage metrics to DPO ```