# Data Protection Impact Assessment -- Biometric System ## Assessment Details | Field | Value | |-------|-------| | DPIA Reference | DPIA-BIO-2026-003 | | Assessment Date | 2026-03-15 | | Controller | NovaPharma GmbH | | DPO | Dr. Sabine Kessler, Group DPO | | DPIA Lead | Information Security & Privacy Office | | Review Cycle | Annual (next: 2027-03-15) | --- ## Section 1: Biometric System Description | Field | Value | |-------|-------| | System Name | SecureEntry Fingerprint Access Control | | Modality | Fingerprint Recognition | | Matching Mode | 1:1 Verification | | Template Storage | On-device (employee ID badge) -- CNIL Tier 1 | | Vendor | Suprema BioStar 2 | | Enrolled Subjects | 2,400 (employees and contractors) | | Daily Transactions | 9,600 | | Deployment Locations | HQ Building A, R&D Laboratory, Data Centre | | Liveness Detection | Yes (capacitive + temperature sensing, ISO 30107 Level 2) | | ISO 24745 Compliant | Yes (cancelable biometric templates) | | Non-Biometric Alternative | PIN + proximity badge available at all access points | --- ## Section 2: DPIA Obligation | EDPB Criterion | Met | Reason | |----------------|-----|--------| | Special category data (Criterion 4) | Yes | Fingerprint data for unique identification under Art. 9(1) | | Large-scale processing (Criterion 5) | Yes | 2,400 enrolled subjects, 9,600 daily transactions | | Systematic monitoring (Criterion 3) | No | Fingerprint is active biometric (not passive surveillance) | | Innovative technology (Criterion 8) | No | Fingerprint verification is established technology | | Vulnerable data subjects (Criterion 7) | Yes | Employees (power imbalance in employment relationship) | | Automated decision-making (Criterion 2) | Yes | Automated access grant/deny decisions | **Conclusion**: DPIA mandatory -- 4 of 6 EDPB criteria met. --- ## Section 3: Necessity and Proportionality ### Purpose Controlling physical access to R&D laboratory containing proprietary pharmaceutical formulations and data centre housing patient clinical trial data. ### Lawful Basis Art. 6(1)(b)/(c) Employment + Art. 9(2)(b) Employment Obligations under German BDSG Section 26(3). ### Alternatives Evaluated | Alternative | Assessment | Reason Insufficient | |-------------|-----------|-------------------| | Proximity badge only | Insufficient | 17 tailgating incidents in 12 months; badge sharing in 3 audit findings | | Badge + PIN | Insufficient | PIN sharing in 8 cases; fails pharmaceutical GMP compliance | | Smart card + password | Impractical | Cleanroom gloving prevents keyboard input | ### Conclusions | Test | Result | Rationale | |------|--------|-----------| | Necessity | Necessary | Biometric verification required for pharmaceutical cleanroom and data centre; documented failure of less intrusive alternatives | | Proportionality | Proportionate | Targeted to 3 high-security locations; on-device storage; alternative method available | ### DPO Advice DPO concurs with necessity finding for R&D and data centre. Recommends annual review and demographic accuracy audit across employee population. --- ## Section 4: Risk Assessment | Risk ID | Category | Description | Likelihood | Severity | Inherent Score | Inherent Level | Residual Score | Residual Level | |---------|----------|-------------|-----------|----------|---------------|----------------|---------------|----------------| | BIO-R1 | Template Breach | Unauthorised access to fingerprint templates; irrevocable identity data | 2 | 4 | 8 | High | 1 | Low | | BIO-R2 | Function Creep | Access control data repurposed for time monitoring | 2 | 3 | 6 | Medium | 1 | Low | | BIO-R3 | Discrimination | Varying scanner accuracy by demographic group | 3 | 3 | 9 | High | 2 | Low | | BIO-R4 | Spoofing | Artificial fingerprint bypass attempt | 2 | 3 | 6 | Medium | 1 | Low | | BIO-R5 | Vendor Data Access | Vendor support staff accessing templates | 2 | 4 | 8 | High | 1 | Low | | BIO-R6 | Irrevocability | Lifetime impact of compromised fingerprint data | 2 | 4 | 8 | High | 2 | Low | --- ## Section 5: Mitigation Measures ### M1: On-Device Template Storage | Field | Value | |-------|-------| | Description | Templates stored exclusively on employee ID badges (CNIL Tier 1); no centralised fingerprint database exists | | Standard | CNIL Reglement Type Biometrie / ISO/IEC 24745:2022 | | Addresses | BIO-R1, BIO-R6 | | Status | Verified | ### M2: Template and Transit Encryption | Field | Value | |-------|-------| | Description | AES-256 encryption of templates on badge chip; TLS 1.3 for all scanner-to-controller communication | | Standard | GDPR Art. 32(1)(a) | | Addresses | BIO-R1 | | Status | Verified | ### M3: Purpose Limitation Architecture | Field | Value | |-------|-------| | Description | Technical controls restricting fingerprint use to physical access only; system architecture prevents data export to HR, payroll, or time and attendance systems | | Standard | GDPR Art. 5(1)(b) Purpose Limitation | | Addresses | BIO-R2 | | Status | Implemented | ### M4: Alternative Access Method | Field | Value | |-------|-------| | Description | PIN + proximity badge alternative available at all access points for employees with skin conditions, injuries, religious objections, or general objection; no adverse consequences policy signed by HR Director | | Standard | CNIL Reglement Type Biometrie | | Addresses | BIO-R3 | | Status | Verified | ### M5: Demographic Accuracy Audit | Field | Value | |-------|-------| | Description | Quarterly accuracy audit across employee demographic groups; scanner recalibration triggered when False Rejection Rate exceeds 2% for any group | | Standard | ISO/IEC 19795:2021 | | Addresses | BIO-R3 | | Status | Implemented (first audit completed Q1 2026) | ### M6: Liveness Detection | Field | Value | |-------|-------| | Description | Suprema BioStar 2 capacitive + temperature sensing liveness detection; ISO 30107 Level 2 certified; defeats photograph, silicone, and gelatin spoofing attacks | | Standard | ISO/IEC 30107:2023 | | Addresses | BIO-R4 | | Status | Verified | ### M7: Vendor Access Restriction | Field | Value | |-------|-------| | Description | Art. 28 DPA with Suprema prohibiting remote template access; all maintenance conducted on-site with DPO observer present; audit clause exercised annually | | Standard | GDPR Art. 28(3) | | Addresses | BIO-R5 | | Status | Verified | ### M8: Cancelable Biometric Transformation | Field | Value | |-------|-------| | Description | System-specific irreversible template transformation using cancelable biometrics; templates from this system cannot be matched against templates in any other biometric system | | Standard | ISO/IEC 24745:2022 Section 6 | | Addresses | BIO-R6 | | Status | Verified | --- ## Section 6: Template Storage Assessment (CNIL Hierarchy) | Field | Value | |-------|-------| | Storage Method | On-device (employee ID badge) | | CNIL Tier | Tier 1 (Lowest Risk) | | Justification | Standard justification sufficient | | Assessment | Compliant with preferred storage method per CNIL Reglement Type Biometrie | --- ## Section 7: Art. 36 Prior Consultation | Field | Value | |-------|-------| | Prior Consultation Required | **No** | | Rationale | All residual risks reduced to Low after mitigation; no 1:N identification; alternative method available | | Condition | Re-assess if system expanded beyond current 3 locations or to new modalities | --- ## Section 8: Sign-Off | Role | Name | Date | Decision | |------|------|------|----------| | DPO | Dr. Sabine Kessler | 2026-03-15 | DPIA approved; residual risk acceptable | | CISO | Thomas Richter | 2026-03-15 | Technical safeguards adequate; M5 ongoing audit confirmed | | Head of R&D | Prof. Dr. Martin Weber | 2026-03-15 | Operational necessity confirmed for cleanroom and data centre | | Works Council Chair | Andrea Hoffmann | 2026-03-14 | Works council consulted; agreement obtained per BetrVG Section 87(1)(6) | | Head of HR | Julia Braun | 2026-03-15 | Alternative access method confirmed; no adverse consequences policy signed |